TOOOOOOO!

BigEd76 · October 21, 2005, 05:47:56 PM

Quote from: ice grillin you on October 21, 2005, 09:46:01 AMis it to much to ask for a wr better than thrash and pinkston but without the baggage of TO???

We could draft one.....oh wait....

WEST is GOD · October 21, 2005, 06:34:04 PM

Quote from: ice grillin you on October 21, 2005, 09:46:01 AM
is it to much to ask for a wr better than thrash and pinkston but without the baggage of TO???

as rjs said TO's cancerous nature outweights his numbers...why cant they get a good wr who isnt the biggest icehole thats ever lived

Yes, it is too much. On top of that we need one that fits the WCO. So let's look at all the WRs out there that can give us production near(but maybe not quite as good) as TO, but with less baggage. These may or may not be WCO receivers.

Chad Johnson - untouchable
Marvin Harrison - untouchable
Randy Moss - untouchable(less locker room baggage)
Steve Smith - untouchable
Torry Holt - untouchable

Those are the only players who will give close to TO production throughout a season. If you want less baggage than TO and a player that realistically we could get then the talent is going to be a significant dropoff. Talent and production far outweighs the baggage. It's better to take the baggage because it doesn't hurt the team. If you think it does you are clueless, and letting your bias get in the way.

There is one player that the Eagles could get if TO is gone(and he won't be), but if somehow he is then Chris Chambers MAY be an option. Even that is a big stretch, but he hasn't had a 1,000 yard receiving season yet, but I think that is because of his QB situation. The guy has great hands, very good athleticism, and decent speed. He's someone I would like to go after if the TO situation blows up again, but again even that is unlikely and even he wouldn't come close to TO's numbers.

Sgt PSN · October 21, 2005, 07:10:13 PM

Chambers would be a pretty good fit here. I could see him putting up the same type of numbers Irvin Fryar did in his first couple of years with the Eagles.

Hey, I got an idea.........

GET FRYAR!

shorebird · October 21, 2005, 10:00:14 PM

Quote from: ice grillin you on October 21, 2005, 09:52:39 AM
its cause donovans shook that if he doesnt go TO's way minimum 30 times a game he will have a meltdown

He's not shook, he knows thats his biggest threat on the field. You shore do claim to know a lot about what Dmac is thinking.

One reason Dmac's numbers might not be that good throwing to Owens is because he's plain out missed him when he's been wide open a good many times this year. Throwing in the grass or way over his head. This crap about TO dropping passed is bull. He drops a few, as does any reciever, but he makes plays that will make you forget about the drops.

shorebird · October 21, 2005, 10:02:04 PM

Quote from: rjs246 on October 21, 2005, 09:43:06 AM
I said the same thing everyone else did. That we needed to upgrade and badly. But you can go back and look at my posts... I didn't want TO here then, and I don't want him here now. I would have taken just about anyone in the league over Thrash and Pinkston, but TO was excluded from that list.

I can't wait until next year when his ass is gone and destroying some other team.

I can't wait to see him destroy teams this year, which he will when given the chance. And I'm not talking about the Eagles either.

stillupfront · October 21, 2005, 10:09:02 PM

I really think that the whole TO/DMac thing is contrived. They are laughing their asses off at us all

shorebird · October 21, 2005, 10:09:41 PM

I dunno' about that, if they are, then they are some hell of a couple of actors.

rjs246 · October 22, 2005, 03:22:01 PM

Quote from: shorebird on October 21, 2005, 10:00:14 PM
One reason Dmac's numbers might not be that good throwing to Owens is because he's plain out missed him when he's been wide open a good many times this year. Throwing in the grass or way over his head. This crap about TO dropping passed is bull. He drops a few, as does any reciever, but he makes plays that will make you forget about the drops.

So are you saying that McNabb has been less accurate throwing specifically to TO than to any of the other recievers? That doesn't make a whole hell of a lot of sense.

JTrotter Fan · October 22, 2005, 04:11:04 PM

McNabb is good. TO is good. What the farg else do you want. Go root for the farging Patriots if you don't like it.

rjs246 · October 22, 2005, 04:13:02 PM

Wow, really good point. I think one of our players is a shteinhead so I'm not a real fan and should go root for another team. Eat my ass.

bleufunk · October 22, 2005, 04:16:48 PM

Quote from: The Waco Kid on October 22, 2005, 04:11:04 PM
McNabb is good. TO is good. What the farg else do you want. Go root for the farging Patriots if you don't like it.

God for bid a fan crticizes an eagle player or the front office.

JTrotter Fan · October 22, 2005, 05:18:34 PM

Quote from: rjs246 on October 22, 2005, 04:13:02 PM
Wow, really good point. I think one of our players is a shteinhead so I'm not a real fan and should go root for another team. Eat my ass.

Did i address you anywhere in that post? You are a paranoid motherfarger...get over yourself...not everyone is thinking about you 24/7. That was a general post to anyone.

If i mean to insult rjs...i will say...hey rjs, and then finish the post. Cripes you bitter old bitch...are you sure you're not a woman?

rjs246 · October 22, 2005, 05:26:56 PM

Read what you wrote. And then read what I've written in this thread and tell me you weren't talking about/to me. Dumbass.

JTrotter Fan · October 22, 2005, 05:29:26 PM

Look icehole...i farging told you i would've said your name. Get it through your farged up head that not everyone cares about you and what you think.

I'm tired of all haters of TO...so if you want to include yourself to make yourself feel better...so be it. Dick.

shorebird · October 22, 2005, 10:32:59 PM

Quote from: rjs246 on October 21, 2005, 09:49:05 AM
I posted this a while ago in some other thread, but McNabb's numbers are actually worse when he throws to Owens than they are when he throws to anyone else. Of course, McNabb sends most of his passes TO's way so his numbers are ridiculously inflated. Burn him.

Quote from: rjs246 on October 22, 2005, 03:22:01 PM
Quote from: shorebird on October 21, 2005, 10:00:14 PM
One reason Dmac's numbers might not be that good throwing to Owens is because he's plain out missed him when he's been wide open a good many times this year. Throwing in the grass or way over his head. This crap about TO dropping passed is bull. He drops a few, as does any receiver, but he makes plays that will make you forget about the drops.

So are you saying that McNabb has been less accurate throwing specifically to TO than to any of the other receivers? That doesn't make a whole hell of a lot of sense.

What the farg are you saying?? It makes sense when you say it, but not when I try and explain it by stating the obvious that McNabb has been inaccurate this year? Not just to TO but to all his receivers.

Will you try and explain it by saying the player you hate drops passes? Do you actually think that TO drops more passes than an injured McNabb throws incompletion's??

Your constant trashing of TO's attitude might have some validation, but trashing his abilities doesn't wash with me. He's by far the best receiver on this team, one of the best in the whole NFL, and saying McNabbs numbers are worse when he throws to TO, because it's TO he's throwing to, defiantly doesn't make a hell of a lot of sense.

I know, let's throw to Lewis and McMullen all the time so McNabbs numbers are better, that will translate into wins.