The farg you Andy... I mean post-game thread

[MURP]

Mike Patterson has been playing damn good for a rookie

key words...for a rookie...why is a rookie out there being depended on to start on a superbowl winning team...

what, like Jamal Lewis for the Ravens in 2000?  like Richard Seymour for the Pats in 2001?  Or Ty Warren for the Pats in 2003? Or Vince Wilfork for the Pats in 2004? 

MURP 6.5 Troll 1.5

[ice grillin you]

jamal is a running back...no comparison to an undersized dt...furthermore jamal took eric rhetts place... couldnt get much worse than that

and theres no comparison btwn the eagles and the patriots...the patriots have proven to be genius like in plugging in almost anyone and still winning superbowls...the eagles have trouble even getting to superbowls

[Tomahawk]

You get two points for that? I call shenanigans.

[MURP]

jamal is a running back...no comparison to an undersized dt...furthermore jamal took eric rhetts place... couldnt get much worse than that

and theres no comparison btwn the eagles and the patriots...the patriots have proven to be genius like in plugging in almost anyone and still winning superbowls...the eagles have trouble even getting to superbowls

ha, i give you 4 examples in the past 5 seasons... 3 of which are DT's and thats the best excuse you can come up with. 

You get two points for that? I call shenanigans.

nah, I was at 5.5 for a previous victory.  Igy just doesnt want to add any points to further distance himself.     

[ice grillin you]

ha, i give you 4 examples in the past 5 seasons... 3 of which are DT's

you gave me a rb who replaced a guy that couldnt play anymore

and three patriots

if the eagles had won the superbowl last year then they get a pass for not improving or at the very least keeping the team as good...but they didnt...they were a pubic hair away...and what they did is weaken their roster...that is what is inexcusable

[MURP]

lol.  whatever man.  You couldnt believe that a rookie would be asked to play well on a SB team.  You failed to realize that on many winning SB teams that there were rookies who contributed in a big way.  You try and make up an excuse for every single situation but the Eagles.   hilarious. 

[ice grillin you]

lol.  whatever man.  You couldnt believe that a rookie would be asked to play well on a SB team

no i didnt i was talking about the eagles THIS year and you started bring up the 2000 ravens and the complete history of the new england patriots...

what i said was how could the eagles be 12 mil under the cap and let their best dt go and replace him with an undersized rookie...ive yet to hear a legit answer for that one

[Purple_Hayz]

I call shenanigans! I know this has been posted elsewhere on this board but I can't find the thread so anyway here's your legit answer:
2005          Tackles  Asst  Sacks  Pass Def
Simon         9           6        0        2
Patterson   14         1        2        0
Yeah we sure miss Corey Simon there, yessirree.  Wotta stud.

[Wingspan]

lol.  whatever man.  You couldnt believe that a rookie would be asked to play well on a SB team.  You failed to realize that on many winning SB teams that there were rookies who contributed in a big way.  You try and make up an excuse for every single situation but the Eagles.   hilarious. 

no rookies ever have played on a superbowl team. EVER!

rookies only speak when spoken to! damnit!!

[ice grillin you]

I call shenanigans! I know this has been posted elsewhere on this board but I can't find the thread so anyway here's your legit answer:
2005          Tackles  Asst  Sacks  Pass Def
Simon         9           6        0        2
Patterson   14         1        2        0
Yeah we sure miss Corey Simon there, yessirree.

lolol...geek

fyi sporto i never said get rid of patterson and keep simon so i have no idea why youd compare their stats

[SunMo]

because it makes the kool-aid taste better.


i just want somebody to tell me that a rotation of Hollis, Patterson, Rayburn, Marshall is better than a rotation of Simon, Hollis, Patterson, Rayburn.

[Purple_Hayz]

lolol...geek

fyi sporto i never said get rid of patterson and keep simon so i have no idea why youd compare their stats

No, what you actually said that prompted my post was:

what i said was how could the eagles be 12 mil under the cap and let their best dt go and replace him with an undersized rookie...ive yet to hear a legit answer for that one

So I replied:

I call shenanigans! I know this has been posted elsewhere on this board but I can't find the thread so anyway here's your legit answer:
2005 Tackles Asst Sacks Pass Def
Simon 9 6 0 2
Patterson 14 1 2 0
Yeah we sure miss Corey Simon there, yessirree. Wotta stud.

Reading comprehension is your friend.

[rjs246]

Hey! Let's all talk about something that happened 7 weeks ago!

[Wingspan]

because it makes the kool-aid taste better.


i just want somebody to tell me that a rotation of Hollis, Patterson, Rayburn, Marshall is better than a rotation of Simon, Hollis, Patterson, Rayburn.

it's not

but Hollis, Patterson, Rayburn, Walker could be

[SunMo]

Hey! Let's all talk about something that happened 7 weeks ago!

something that happened 7 weeks ago, but still has ramifications today.