ConcreteBoard

Eagles => Eagles Talk => Topic started by: MURP on August 30, 2005, 10:33:49 AM

Poll
Question: Should the Eagles add Peter Warrick?
Option 1: yes, they should sign him
Option 2: no, dont sign him
Title: Peter Warrick
Post by: MURP on August 30, 2005, 10:33:49 AM
per the Bengals website, it says that Warrick is going to be cut this morning.  Assuming he is cut for the sake of talk, should the Birds pursue?     link (http://www.bengals.com/)

QuoteESPN.com is reporting that the Bengals plan to release wide receiver Peter Warrick on Tuesday morning as part of the league-mandated cutdown to 68 players. The move, anticipated for months, comes the morning after Warrick publicly asked the Bengals to release him Tuesday rather than Saturday if they planned to terminate his six-year contract that ended this year with a $2.2 million salary.

The club has not yet officially released its list of cuts that have to be done by 4 p.m. Tuesday.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on August 30, 2005, 10:35:04 AM
I voted for no. The guy is a pain in the ass. I would rather them take a flyer on McCants, or another veteran WR that's floating around.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Wingspan on August 30, 2005, 10:36:31 AM
no
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: mussa on August 30, 2005, 10:36:53 AM
uhhhh if they have $ left over after signing lewis and westy, then sure why not if we can get him cheap?  depth biatch!  maybe this signing would be the end of pinky...hooray if so!   :yay :yay
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Rome on August 30, 2005, 10:37:21 AM
The guy was unreal at Florida State.

If he's available and healthy, I'd take him for no other reason than his ability to change a game at the return position.

What's the harm?  He's gotta be better than Wilbur or the other stiffs they have on the roster.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: phattymatty on August 30, 2005, 10:38:30 AM
I say go for it, he can return kicks too.  If we get him cheap it's worth a shot.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: MDS on August 30, 2005, 10:40:27 AM
Not worth it. We have a big enough drama queen in TO, don't need another one. I'd like to add another reciever, but give me someone who will come in here and accept a 3rd-4th string role, shut his mouth and play football.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: ice grillin you on August 30, 2005, 10:40:34 AM
warrick>>>>>>>>>>mahe

if youre thinking wr position then id much rather have mccants
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: TempleOwl on August 30, 2005, 10:42:21 AM
Take him, then he can argue with T.O. and keep him from arguing with everyone else.  I was wondering the same thing about Maurice Clarett, should we take a chance on him.  Also, I like the McCants idea.  i haven't seen anything from McMullin so McCants or Warrick for McMullin works for me.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: RezRob on August 30, 2005, 10:43:55 AM
Quote from: phattymatty on August 30, 2005, 10:38:30 AM
If we get him cheap it's worth a shot.
You'd think coming from a crap team like Cin he'd play for cheap w/a contender who offers him a chance to get playing time. He certainly has the experience to fight off Brown and even Lewis if they come out subpar when the season hits. Let's get him before the Pats sign their 20th recvr!
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: PhillyGirl on August 30, 2005, 10:44:25 AM
Quote from: TempleOwl on August 30, 2005, 10:42:21 AM
I was wondering the same thing about Maurice Clarett, should we take a chance on him. 

No offense, but...  ::)   Get that dumbass thought out of your head.



As for Warrick? I'm voting no. As others have said, I am concerned enough with TO possibly blowing up this year. Having 2 possible headcases doesn't feel right.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: ice grillin you on August 30, 2005, 10:45:47 AM
id seriously rather have reno mahe than clarett and its not really close
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Purple_Hayz on August 30, 2005, 10:47:50 AM
I'd agree that Warrick was a stud at FSU.  That said, he hasn't made a big name for himself in the NFL though being a Bungle certainly hasn't helped him any in that respect.  And as much of a PITA as he could potentially be I doubt that he'd be in TO territory.  I'd tentatively say yes but it's not like I'm going to get an Eskin-style KJ hardon over him or anything.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Rome on August 30, 2005, 10:48:49 AM
Warrick's raw talent makes him far superior to any other option the Eagles might be considering.

I'm telling you guys, the fact that he had to play in Cincinnati is what caused him to melt down over the years.  Playing for an organization like the Eagles could be the impetus for him to recharge his career.

At the very least, it wouldn't cost the Eagles much to take a flier on him.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Mad-Lad on August 30, 2005, 10:49:15 AM
it's a tough call.  I'd hate for him to keep guys like Reggie off the field, but i'm intrigued as to how good he would be on a quality team.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 30, 2005, 10:49:47 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on August 30, 2005, 10:45:47 AM
id seriously rather have reno mahe than clarett and its not really close

Me too, and I think Reno absolutely sucks.  Clarett is not only a stupid, immature kid, but he sucks too.

As for Warrick, I don't think he'd really be a fit... maybe if Dexter was out for the season at PR, but he's only out for a few games as far as I've heard.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: PhillyGirl on August 30, 2005, 10:51:30 AM
Quote from: Purple_Hayz on August 30, 2005, 10:47:50 AM
I'd agree that Warrick was a stud at FSU.  That said, he hasn't made a big name for himself in the NFL though being a Bungle certainly hasn't helped him any in that respect.  And as much of a PITA as he could potentially be I doubt that he'd be in TO territory.  I'd tentatively say yes but it's not like I'm going to get an Eskin-style KJ hardon over him or anything.

hehe...I think you mean, ECKEL. ;)
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Rome on August 30, 2005, 10:52:49 AM
LOL.  You beat me to it, PG.

:-D
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: RezRob on August 30, 2005, 10:55:34 AM
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 30, 2005, 10:49:47 AM
As for Warrick, I don't think he'd really be a fit... maybe if Dexter was out for the season at PR, but he's only out for a few games as far as I've heard.

He would look good in the slot as a playmaker. He has speed and moves. We all saw how Dillon was a different man after he left Cinci, and noone says Warrick caused more grief than Dillon did while he was there.

Quote from: Jerome99RIP on August 30, 2005, 10:48:49 AM
Playing for an organization like the Eagles could be the impetus for him to recharge his career.
At the very least, it wouldn't cost the Eagles much to take a flier on him.
I agree completely
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: ice grillin you on August 30, 2005, 10:58:13 AM
He would look good in the slot as a playmaker. He has speed and moves

id much rather have a big strong guy like mccants...who can also run btw...in the slot than warrick
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Tomahawk on August 30, 2005, 10:58:46 AM
I originally voted no, but after reading jeromeRIP99's reasoning I change my vote. As long as the move would be the precursor to cutting Pinkston.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: 4and26 on August 30, 2005, 11:01:28 AM
Voted Yes - it can't hurt to take a look . . . however my gut would hate for someone like Reggie Brown to lose time if he came into camp
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Larry on August 30, 2005, 11:05:47 AM
I'd have to pass.  Warrick's not healthy.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Phanatic on August 30, 2005, 11:10:12 AM
He can't make the Bengals roster... Why the heck should he be on ours? Take a look sure, but sign nothing...
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: phattymatty on August 30, 2005, 11:28:22 AM
Why does everybody think he's a head case?

He got into a little trouble in college, having a friend of his who worked at a store give him a discount, and thats it.  Big friggen deal.  People seem to forget that Lav Coles was involved in that with him, but for some reason he doesn't have character problems.

Now if Warrick has done something else that I don't know about, please enlighten me, but Warrick would be far and away better than what we have now at the bottom of the roster.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: rjs246 on August 30, 2005, 11:35:46 AM
Dude. Carlos Perez.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Dillen on August 30, 2005, 11:36:12 AM
Quote from: Phanatic on August 30, 2005, 11:10:12 AM
He can't make the Bengals roster... Why the heck should he be on ours? Take a look sure, but sign nothing...
Kind of a stupid question. Johnson, Houshmanzadeh, Washington, Henry is WAY better then Owens, Lewis, Brown, McMullen.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: phattymatty on August 30, 2005, 11:36:18 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on August 30, 2005, 11:35:46 AM
Dude. Carlos Perez.

I know, it hurt me to say that.  Shut up.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 30, 2005, 11:36:30 AM
Quote from: phattymatty on August 30, 2005, 11:28:22 AM
Warrick would be far and away better than what we have now at the bottom of the roster.

Carlos hates you and wants new sponsorship.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: phattymatty on August 30, 2005, 11:37:47 AM
It's obvious that I meant he's better than anyone after Carlos.  Sheesh.

Perez for Prez.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Rome on August 30, 2005, 11:38:28 AM
Quote from: phattymatty on August 30, 2005, 11:37:47 AM
It's obvious that I meant he's better than anyone after Carlos.  Sheesh.

Don't you hate it when they nitpick?

Candyasses...

:boo
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 30, 2005, 11:38:30 AM
Quote from: phattymatty on August 30, 2005, 11:37:47 AM
It's obvious that I meant he's better than anyone after Carlos.  Sheesh.

So, he's better than guys who aren't going to make the team anyway.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: hunt on August 30, 2005, 11:39:44 AM
warrick would be #4, imo...and he can return punts.  i'd take him.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: phattymatty on August 30, 2005, 11:40:47 AM
Quote from: mhunt on August 30, 2005, 11:39:44 AM
warrick would be #4, imo...and he can return punts.  i'd take him.

but he stole some jeans in college, we can't have that kind of cancer on the team.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Rome on August 30, 2005, 11:43:15 AM
Quote from: phattymatty on August 30, 2005, 11:40:47 AM
Quote from: mhunt on August 30, 2005, 11:39:44 AM
warrick would be #4, imo...and he can return punts.  i'd take him.

but he stole some jeans in college, we can't have that kind of cancer on the team.

Too bad he didn't beat his wife or smoke some dope... then he'd be signed for sure.

Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: rjs246 on August 30, 2005, 11:45:02 AM
Smoke dope. What are you, my granddad?
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: hunt on August 30, 2005, 11:45:39 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on August 30, 2005, 11:45:02 AM
Smoke dope. What are you, my granddad?

mr. hand is your granddad?
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Larry on August 30, 2005, 12:28:05 PM
Are we gonna have the same poll for Peerless Price?  :-D
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Rome on August 30, 2005, 12:52:59 PM
Quote from: Larry on August 30, 2005, 12:28:05 PM
Are we gonna have the same poll for Peerless Price?  :-D

Smarty would shat on such a poll...

(http://www.abestweb.com/smilies/poopy.gif)
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Mad-Lad on August 30, 2005, 01:23:36 PM
Quote from: Larry on August 30, 2005, 12:28:05 PM
Are we gonna have the same poll for Peerless Price?  :-D

Quote from: Atlanta Journal Constitution
Price was told before practice and sped out of the parking lot at team headquarters in his BMW just as the team was beginning to stretch for the day's drills.

"I hate y'all," Price said to an AJC photographer, before hustling into his car without further comment.

hahaha!  what a toolbag.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: MURP on August 30, 2005, 01:25:38 PM
 :-D
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: rjs246 on August 30, 2005, 01:31:32 PM
Wow. What a douche.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: daigglesfaninva on August 30, 2005, 01:37:06 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on August 30, 2005, 10:48:49 AM
Warrick's raw talent makes him far superior to any other option the Eagles might be considering.

I'm telling you guys, the fact that he had to play in Cincinnati is what caused him to melt down over the years.  Playing for an organization like the Eagles could be the impetus for him to recharge his career.

At the very least, it wouldn't cost the Eagles much to take a flier on him.

It wouldn't be a bad move. Warrick is a solid talent and proven in the NFL. He would have to learn the WCO which is a bigger concern than him being a headcase.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: daigglesfaninva on August 30, 2005, 01:39:38 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on August 30, 2005, 11:40:47 AM
Quote from: mhunt on August 30, 2005, 11:39:44 AM
warrick would be #4, imo...and he can return punts.  i'd take him.

but he stole some jeans in college, we can't have that kind of cancer on the team.

Calvin Kleins too...no way should he be on any NFL roster after that.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: greenbleeder on August 30, 2005, 02:16:45 PM
Now this dude is just not what people think he is. He is a bum- flat out. He'd be lucky to catch passes from Ryan Leaf in Edmonton.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: RezRob on August 30, 2005, 02:41:01 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=1917297
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=2130403
All the Warrick Shtein you can handle. If healthy productive. Not healthy not productive.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: MURP on August 30, 2005, 02:42:21 PM
I say no Warrick.   
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Don Ho on August 30, 2005, 03:26:21 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on August 30, 2005, 10:40:34 AM
warrick>>>>>>>>>>mahe

if youre thinking wr position then id much rather have mccants

Watch it there.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Don Ho on August 30, 2005, 03:27:36 PM
No - get McCants.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: WEST is GOD on August 30, 2005, 03:31:10 PM
Rather have Price.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 30, 2005, 04:24:55 PM
I'd rather have a beer.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Purple_Hayz on August 30, 2005, 04:47:49 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 30, 2005, 10:51:30 AM
Quote from: Purple_Hayz on August 30, 2005, 10:47:50 AM
I'd agree that Warrick was a stud at FSU. That said, he hasn't made a big name for himself in the NFL though being a Bungle certainly hasn't helped him any in that respect. And as much of a PITA as he could potentially be I doubt that he'd be in TO territory. I'd tentatively say yes but it's not like I'm going to get an Eskin-style KJ hardon over him or anything.


hehe...I think you mean, ECKEL. ;)
Yeah, I meant Eckel not Eskin.  My proofreading has been deteriorating with age and the impending meeting that was coming up didn't help me either.  :win
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Mad-Lad on August 30, 2005, 04:48:48 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 30, 2005, 04:24:55 PM
I'd rather have a beer.

good call.  I'm thinking a tall boy of High Life.   :drool
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: WEST is GOD on August 30, 2005, 04:59:45 PM
If Warrick was healthy I'd want him over Price. He's just the better player. He isn't healthy though, and is very prone to injuries.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Wingspan on August 30, 2005, 05:08:19 PM
has anyone brought up yet that warrick is a client of a certian unnamed agent of another eagle WR?
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Number1EaglesFan on August 30, 2005, 05:10:49 PM
Quote from: daigglesfaninva on August 30, 2005, 01:37:06 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on August 30, 2005, 10:48:49 AM
Warrick's raw talent makes him far superior to any other option the Eagles might be considering.

I'm telling you guys, the fact that he had to play in Cincinnati is what caused him to melt down over the years.  Playing for an organization like the Eagles could be the impetus for him to recharge his career.

At the very least, it wouldn't cost the Eagles much to take a flier on him.

It wouldn't be a bad move. Warrick is a solid talent and proven in the NFL. He would have to learn the WCO which is a bigger concern than him being a headcase.
Actuallly Warrick has played in a West Coast style of offense during his career in Cincy.

I'm in favor of the Eagles going after & signing Peter Warrick. :yay
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: DH on August 30, 2005, 05:11:26 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on August 30, 2005, 05:08:19 PM
has anyone brought up yet that warrick is a client of a certian unnamed agent of another eagle WR?

I dont think "unnamed agent" will be looking for a deal that would raise "unnamed WR's" contract demads.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Number1EaglesFan on August 30, 2005, 05:11:42 PM
Quote from: Monster on August 30, 2005, 03:31:10 PM
Rather have Price.
Ugh... :-X
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: ice grillin you on August 30, 2005, 05:13:43 PM
has anyone brought up yet that warrick is a client of a certian unnamed agent of another eagle WR?

irrelevant
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Wingspan on August 30, 2005, 05:14:33 PM
Quote from: Die-Hard on August 30, 2005, 05:11:26 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on August 30, 2005, 05:08:19 PM
has anyone brought up yet that warrick is a client of a certian unnamed agent of another eagle WR?

I dont think "unnamed agent" will be looking for a deal that would raise "unnamed WR's" contract demads.

maybe, but what about what warrick wants?

(this is a prime example of my "clients best interest" in how many people this guy represents)
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: NGM on August 30, 2005, 05:15:29 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on August 30, 2005, 05:13:43 PM
has anyone brought up yet that warrick is a client of a certian unnamed agent of another eagle WR?

irrelevant

You don't think that would matter to the FO at all? 
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Don Ho on August 30, 2005, 05:18:10 PM
Quote from: NGM on August 30, 2005, 05:15:29 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on August 30, 2005, 05:13:43 PM
has anyone brought up yet that warrick is a client of a certian unnamed agent of another eagle WR?

irrelevant

You don't think that would matter to the FO at all? 

END OF THREAD
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Wingspan on August 30, 2005, 05:18:45 PM
Quote from: NGM on August 30, 2005, 05:15:29 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on August 30, 2005, 05:13:43 PM
has anyone brought up yet that warrick is a client of a certian unnamed agent of another eagle WR?

irrelevant

You don't think that would matter to the FO at all? 

i actually dont normally, but this may be different.

banner has dealt with him tons. and with the hugh douglas mess, then turned around and signed kearse.

my only concern with this is that you're dealing with a WR, which could be seen as taking money away from the other guy.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: dis12 on August 30, 2005, 06:02:42 PM
Quote from: Die-Hard on August 30, 2005, 05:11:26 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on August 30, 2005, 05:08:19 PM
has anyone brought up yet that warrick is a client of a certian unnamed agent of another eagle WR?

I dont think "unnamed agent" will be looking for a deal that would raise "unnamed WR's" contract demads.

Y'know, I was just starting to like the idea of signing Warrick....now you hit me with this?!?!?   Ah what the heck, sign him.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on August 30, 2005, 06:40:20 PM
I'd take him if he's cheap.

PR + 3rdWR
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Rome on August 30, 2005, 06:42:32 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on August 30, 2005, 06:40:20 PM
I'd take him if he's cheap.

PR + 3rdWR

Well, it's official now.

No way they sign Pete.

:boom
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on August 30, 2005, 08:02:57 PM
QuotePatriots | Interested in Warrick
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:49:59 -0700

ESPN.com's Len Pasquarelli reports the New England Patriots have shown an interest in free agent WR Peter Warrick (Bengals).


Seahawks | Warrick Coming for Visit
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:48:04 -0700

ESPN.com's Len Pasquarelli reports the Seattle Seahawks have shown an interest in free agent WR Peter Warrick (Bengals). He is en route to Seattle to visit with team officials.


Buccaneers | Interested in Warrick
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:47:47 -0700

ESPN.com's Len Pasquarelli reports the Tampa Bay Buccaneers have shown an interest in free agent WR Peter Warrick (Bengals). He is likely to make a trip to visit with the team in the coming days.


Giants | Interested in Warrick
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:47:21 -0700

ESPN.com's Len Pasquarelli reports the New York Giants have shown an interest in free agent WR Peter Warrick (Bengals). He is likely to make a trip to visit with the team in the coming days.


Packers | Interested in Warrick
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:46:13 -0700

ESPN.com's Len Pasquarelli reports the Green Bay Packers have shown an interest in free agent WR Peter Warrick (Bengals).


Colts | Interested in Warrick
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:45:44 -0700

ESPN.com's Len Pasquarelli reports the Indianapolis Colts have shown an interest in free agent WR Peter Warrick (Bengals).

I think he ends up in Seattle.

They have a crying need for WRs who don't have feet for hands.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: WEST is GOD on August 30, 2005, 09:20:27 PM
What a surprise. Eagles are happy with their own guys.

That was semi-sarcastic. I still think the Eagles have a shot to get him, but then again I expect them to give us the "we love the guys we have" BS. Mcmullen SUCKS. I don't want to hear it, and no matter how much they sell it I will NEVER buy it.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: BigEd76 on August 30, 2005, 11:37:14 PM
Spadaro:

Quote"I won't tell you if the Eagles are or aren't interested. If he's healthy, he can help a team. If he's not healthy, he's not worth a bid"

hmmmmmm
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: WEST is GOD on August 31, 2005, 12:16:58 AM
I don't think he means much by that.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: daigglesfaninva on August 31, 2005, 12:18:04 AM
Dave's double speak doesn't impress me. That Dave's way of saying "the sky maybe blue tomorrow but if not it will be another day."
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Feva on August 31, 2005, 04:36:26 AM
Quote from: daigglesfaninva on August 31, 2005, 12:18:04 AM
Dave's double speak doesn't impress me. That Dave's way of saying "the sky maybe blue tomorrow but if not it will be another day."
Yeah, but will it rain?
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: General_Failure on August 31, 2005, 04:40:01 AM
Definitely maybe.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: ice grillin you on August 31, 2005, 05:56:45 AM
You don't think that would matter to the FO at all?

rosenhaus should be disbarred if he let something personal get in the way of helping a client

reid and banner should be fired if they let something personal get in the way of helping the eagles

i have confidence in all these people that none of them would let that happen

each and every transaction is different from the next and should and will be treated as such as these people are all professionals
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Don Ho on August 31, 2005, 05:57:03 AM
Quote from: General_Failure on August 31, 2005, 04:40:01 AM
Definitely maybe.

Absolutely sort of.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Feva on August 31, 2005, 07:23:33 AM
Quote from: Don Ho on August 31, 2005, 05:57:03 AM
Quote from: General_Failure on August 31, 2005, 04:40:01 AM
Definitely maybe.

Absolutely sort of.
Not quite...but surely.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: MURP on August 31, 2005, 09:10:29 AM
love it when KFFL makes 10 reports instead of 1 naming all the teams involved.  ha.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on August 31, 2005, 09:24:41 AM
QuoteWARRICK IN SEATTLE



A league source tells us that free-agent receiver Peter Warrick arrived in Seattle late Tuesday for a visit with the Seahawks. 



Warrick, per the source, will take a physical Wednesday morning.



The former first-rounder would bolster a receiving corps that features Darrell Jackson and veteran Bobby Engram as starters.  2001 first-rounder Koren Robinson was cut during the offseason.

From PFT.com...
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: RezRob on August 31, 2005, 09:31:32 AM
Quote from: Wingspan on August 30, 2005, 05:08:19 PM

has anyone brought up yet that warrick is a client of a certian unnamed agent of another eagle WR?


Does Mussa know this yet?  :o  :boom  :-D
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: BigEd76 on August 31, 2005, 03:17:56 PM
Mr. NC: "Warrick is a p***y, apparently."  :-D
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Zanshin on August 31, 2005, 03:20:04 PM
Quote from: MURP on August 31, 2005, 09:10:29 AM
love it when KFFL makes 10 reports instead of 1 naming all the teams involved. ha.

They sort of have to in order to slice and dice it by player and team later.  But it looks annoying.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: MURP on August 31, 2005, 03:36:16 PM
or they could just put the same thing under every team.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: 4and26 on August 31, 2005, 06:31:51 PM
ESPN reporting he's landed in Seattle . . . .
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 31, 2005, 06:32:47 PM
We might as well pack it in.  Hello NFC championship for Seattle.
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: WEST is GOD on August 31, 2005, 06:37:30 PM
Thanks Andy.  :boom
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on August 31, 2005, 06:37:44 PM
I hear Monster is on the Ben Franklin prepared to jump  :yay
Title: Re: Peter Warrick
Post by: Tomahawk on August 31, 2005, 06:47:01 PM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on August 31, 2005, 06:37:44 PM
I hear Monster is on the Ben Franklin prepared to jump  :yay

That would be farging AWESOME!