2005 Point & Laugh At The taterskins Thread

[terpseagles]

Here's a gem I just ran across over on ES.... now, to some of their credits... they're calling the guy out on this.... some.

We play the kind of football... that will always result in a victory. Play flawlessly on offense and control the time of possession. When the other team is on the field, make sure they don't score points (Seattle doesn't count considering our decimated secondary when they were scoring). The exact same way it was done in the 80s. Honestly, no one in the NFL plays the way the Skins do. Everyone has these piss poor defenses and quick strike offenses. We play the game like it was meant to be played.

http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=118713

[Larry]

Play flawlessly on offense ...

Is that all it takes. 

The Skins play flawlessly on offense and struggle to put up 20.

If we played flawlessly on offense, we'd stick 60.

[MadMarchHare]

Skins play football that gives Fans hypertension, makes them nervous wrecks,
drink too much, and heart attacks.

[FreakisaKearseWord]

Sorry, I'm still chuckling about Josh parry decking Shawn Springs 

[Tomahawk]

Arguing with Skins fans is maddening. Every year they believe that their team is good, no matter how much evidence there is to the contrary.

They won 9-7 against a terrible chicago team.
They won 14-13 against a team that dominated them for 45 minutes and then proceded to make no effort on offense in the fourth quarter. Parcells gave that game away by being stupid with his offense.
They won 20-17 in OT because the Seahawks' kicker missed not one, but two field goals.

Easily the worst 3-0 team that I can remember, but instead of seeing things through reasonable eyes, they feel the need to brag and boast.

Makes it all the funnier when their team inevitably falls apart.

You are just like the media...all they want to do is say we havent beaten anyone but fail to point out the bucs and bengals 8 wins came against teams with a combined reccord of 6-22.  We won the games.  Chicago is not terrible...they will win the north.  Seattle will also win their division.

Bears will win the North and Seattle will also take their division.  Either thats a bold statement or just an attempt to justify your delirious thoughts of the foreskins being a good team. 

The skins are a good team.  The defense is outstanding.  Only 3 teams have scored over 18 points in the last 19 games.  The offense is improving.  The offense was going to take a setback when Ramsey was replaced.  Since Brunell has had a chance to get the rust off he is looking good.  All those bounces that werent going the skins way are this year...like that INT at the end of the philly-skins game last year.

Name the three teams.

[PhillyPhreak54]

Sorry, I'm still chuckling about Josh parry decking Shawn Springs 

That's the only good thing Josh Parry will ever do in an Eagles uniform.

[skin48]

Arguing with Skins fans is maddening. Every year they believe that their team is good, no matter how much evidence there is to the contrary.

They won 9-7 against a terrible chicago team.
They won 14-13 against a team that dominated them for 45 minutes and then proceded to make no effort on offense in the fourth quarter. Parcells gave that game away by being stupid with his offense.
They won 20-17 in OT because the Seahawks' kicker missed not one, but two field goals.

Easily the worst 3-0 team that I can remember, but instead of seeing things through reasonable eyes, they feel the need to brag and boast.

Makes it all the funnier when their team inevitably falls apart.

You are just like the media...all they want to do is say we havent beaten anyone but fail to point out the bucs and bengals 8 wins came against teams with a combined reccord of 6-22.  We won the games.  Chicago is not terrible...they will win the north.  Seattle will also win their division.

Bears will win the North and Seattle will also take their division.  Either thats a bold statement or just an attempt to justify your delirious thoughts of the foreskins being a good team. 

The skins are a good team.  The defense is outstanding.  Only 3 teams have scored over 18 points in the last 19 games.  The offense is improving.  The offense was going to take a setback when Ramsey was replaced.  Since Brunell has had a chance to get the rust off he is looking good.  All those bounces that werent going the skins way are this year...like that INT at the end of the philly-skins game last year.

Name the three teams.

Eagles 28, Packers 28, Cowboys 21

[Tomahawk]

Arguing with Skins fans is maddening. Every year they believe that their team is good, no matter how much evidence there is to the contrary.

They won 9-7 against a terrible chicago team.
They won 14-13 against a team that dominated them for 45 minutes and then proceded to make no effort on offense in the fourth quarter. Parcells gave that game away by being stupid with his offense.
They won 20-17 in OT because the Seahawks' kicker missed not one, but two field goals.

Easily the worst 3-0 team that I can remember, but instead of seeing things through reasonable eyes, they feel the need to brag and boast.

Makes it all the funnier when their team inevitably falls apart.

You are just like the media...all they want to do is say we havent beaten anyone but fail to point out the bucs and bengals 8 wins came against teams with a combined reccord of 6-22.  We won the games.  Chicago is not terrible...they will win the north.  Seattle will also win their division.

Bears will win the North and Seattle will also take their division.  Either thats a bold statement or just an attempt to justify your delirious thoughts of the foreskins being a good team. 

The skins are a good team.  The defense is outstanding.  Only 3 teams have scored over 18 points in the last 19 games.  The offense is improving.  The offense was going to take a setback when Ramsey was replaced.  Since Brunell has had a chance to get the rust off he is looking good.  All those bounces that werent going the skins way are this year...like that INT at the end of the philly-skins game last year.

Name the three teams.

Eagles 28, Packers 28, Cowboys 21

GO EAGLES!!

[PhillyPhreak54]

ARRINGTON DONE IN D.C.



He's still on the roster, and he likely will be for the remainder of the season.  But it's becoming more and more clear that linebacker LaVar Arrington's tenure with the taterskins will end after the 2005 season.



The root cause of the rift, we hear, is that Arrington doesn't get along with defensive coordinator Gregg Williams, who joined the 'Skins in 2004 after serving as head coach of the Bills for three seasons.



And the root of Arrington's fractured relationship with Williams, we're told, is that Arrington cannot properly assimilate into Williams' highly structured defensive system.  Arrington no longer can freelance, and thus he no longer is effective.



Another reality at work in this case is that Arrington has a knee with little or no cartilage in it.  He'll need something/anything to help avoid constant bone-on-bone grinding, and if he actually were playing it's likely that the pain and swelling from the friction in his knee would ultimately keep him out of action periodically while the thing heals up.



So with no future in D.C., the question becomes whether he'll land somewhere else.  The Broncos and the Bucs are typically interested in sniffing around players with big names, but anyone interested in Arrington surely will take a long look at his knee.



Even if another team is interested, Arrington's agents royally screwed the pooch by making his $6.5 million roster bonus come due in July 2006.  Listen up, agent types -- if your guy is getting a big-money roster bonus in any year of his contract, make the thing come due as early as possible in the league year.  This will force the team to cut him early, allowing the player to hit the free agent market early, when some teams inevitably will overpay.



And the Postons had not one but two shots to alter the trigger for the roster bonus.  Though they missed it when the deal was negotiated in December 2003, they could have adjusted the date of the roster bonus in connection with the "settlement" of Arrington's grievance regarding the alleged existence of a separate 2006 roster bonus in the amount of $6.5 million.



Arrington will, in the end, see neither of those payments, and the taterskins will be able to carry him on the roster deep into the 2006 offseason, making it even harder for him to get paid handsomely elsewhere.



Given the acrimony between Arrington and the organization over the past couple of years, our guess is that the team will take full advantage of its opportunity to stick it back to the guy who never was shy about sticking it to the team.

Another one (draft pick) bites the dust in DC.

Funny thing is that Little Napoleon (Danny) signed him to a fat ass contract and when/if they cut him its going to be a HUGE cap hit.

Hahahahahahahah! I hope Arrington goes somewhere and becomes an All-Pro.

[Larry]

ReTard Arrington's dumb as a rock.

Look at him, he has to wear a farging wristband for the plays. 

[Bigskinbauer]

ReTard Arrington's dumb as a rock.

Look at him, he has to wear a farging wristband for the plays. 

http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI10_McNabbVsLitter.mpg

[Tomahawk]

Bigskinbauer, this thread is to point and laugh at the taterskins; not McNabb. You're going to have to delete that post.

[archer]

ReTard Arrington's dumb as a rock.

Look at him, he has to wear a farging wristband for the plays. 

He's not dumber than the battering ram of linebacker named Trotter, now he's dumb. He is good at plugging holes though, like the one in your rear.

[General_Failure]

And?

[Larry]

I never saw Trotter resort to a wristband playchart.   

With my super Photoshop magnifying glass, I can see what's on it...

1)  Put on left pant leg.
2)  Put on right pant leg.
3)  Put on socks than shoes.  Note to self:  not the other way around like last time.
4)  Go home, complain, and count money.