2013-2014 Sixers Season Thread

Started by PhillyPhreak54, October 30, 2013, 07:50:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ice grillin you

mcw with 18 pts and 14 boards tonight...five minutes left
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Eagles_Legendz

MCW has had a really good last 4 weeks or so after hitting a rough patch when they assembled a AAA team around him post-trade deadline.

PhillyPhreak54

Last 43 games

3-1 vs Boston
2-37 vs everyone else

PhillyPhreak54

Thoughts?

Quote@tmoore76ers: Not saying Sixers should trade MCW. Just wondering if it'd be worth considering if it would allow you to end up with Wiggins and Randle.

ice grillin you

i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

PhillyPhreak54

I think I would too. I like MCW but landing those two would be huge

Eagles_Legendz

I'll pass.  MCW will be a top 8 pg if he develops ANY ability to shoot. 

ice grillin you

imo hes never going to be a good shooter....if you wanna keep him your hope is that he becomes rajon rondo

and if they fill in properly around him then theres nothing wrong with that

personally i don't see massive growth potential with him....but that said i really like him and would def ride or die with him going forward......i don't wanna sound negative about him at all....im just answering the hypothetical

to j's point tho why randle...how about wiggy and exum or wiggy and vonleh....the possibilities are endless if you can get up there
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Eagles_Legendz

I'm really only talking about him becoming a passable shooter.  He already has the height and ability to be a great defender and got a crazy high % of steals in college and for a rookie.  I'm not sure he'll ever be a 'good' shooter but I have no problem with him as a cornerstone piece.  Part of it is I'm just not as high on Randle.  Maybe for Exum.

PhillyPhreak54

I'm not sold on Exum but I'd be cool with Vonleh

I just have a good feeling about Randle. I think with him and Nerlens on the blocks...a banger and a shot blocker...they could be special.

ice grillin you

you don't want randle to be known as a banger....hes not that guy....that's why this year was not the best for him...college game held him back because of the lack of spacing...

randles best case scenario is larmarcus aldrige.....he has to develop that 15-17 footer to stretch defenses....if hes your guy that's why

not to be antonio davis
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

PhillyPhreak54

I think his body type means he's be good as a banger.

Obviously he needs to develop that jumper but why couldn't he make a living on the blocks?

ice grillin you

Quote from: Eagles_Legendz on April 26, 2014, 11:33:44 PM
I'm really only talking about him becoming a passable shooter.  He already has the height and ability to be a great defender and got a crazy high % of steals in college and for a rookie.  I'm not sure he'll ever be a 'good' shooter but I have no problem with him as a cornerstone piece.  Part of it is I'm just not as high on Randle.  Maybe for Exum.

his wingspan is ridiculous as far as getting into lanes and shtein....but he was really bad on defense this year as far as staying in front of his man and on pick n rolls....this is an area where improvement is def possible tho...and if that happens how sick would wiggins and him be up top defensively....that makes my bathing suit area feel funny
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

ice grillin you

Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on April 26, 2014, 11:52:22 PM
I think his body type means he's be good as a banger.

Obviously he needs to develop that jumper but why couldn't he make a living on the blocks?

its not so much that he wouldn't be good as a banger but do you want a top five pick to be a banger?...hes has so much more potential than being a on the block guy....his handle is nice for 250....he gives a mismatch in that dept.....not to mention on the blocks is not where the league is headed....me and you have talked about this before

if you think his future is as a banger then you don't want to take him
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

PhillyPhreak54

I'm not explaining myself well then...I don't want him to only set up camp in the lane. When I say banger I'm talking about a physical guy who can dominate down low. Of course I'd want a guy whose game is multi faceted but when it's time to bang you've got a physical dude who can dominate.