2010 Flyers Season Thread

Started by DH, October 07, 2010, 09:18:59 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Munson

And for some reason, the only part that actually looked steady throughout was the part the Lightning tried to attack 4 times. Boucher's glove on firrrrre
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 01, 2008, 05:10:48 PM
perhaps you could explain sd's reasons for "disliking" it as well since you seem to be so in tune with other peoples minds

SD


rjs246

OHMYGODTHEFLYERSPEEDINTHELIGHTNINGSMOUTHESES
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

PoopyfaceMcGee


rjs246

Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

Munson

#650


What is this I don't even..
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 01, 2008, 05:10:48 PM
perhaps you could explain sd's reasons for "disliking" it as well since you seem to be so in tune with other peoples minds

SD

I see an idiot who can't link a photo

ice grillin you

Quote from: rjs246 on February 15, 2011, 10:53:57 PM
OHMYGODTHEFLYERSPEEDINTHELIGHTNINGSMOUTHESES


Quote
TAMPA, Fla. - Flyers coach Peter Laviolette didn't like the terminology, but many of his players called Tuesday night's showdown against Tampa Bay a statement game.


i tried to tell you last time it was a statement game...and you laughed....i really do try and drop jewels but when people act ignant time after time it makes me wanna not help you....so im just gonna say try less politics and more sports...it will do a body good
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

rjs246

Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

SD

Quote from: ice grillin you on February 16, 2011, 08:11:39 AM


Quote
TAMPA, Fla. - Flyers coach Peter Laviolette didn't like the terminology,


i tried to tell you last time it was a statement game...and you laughed....i really do try and drop jewels but when people act ignant time after time it makes me wanna not help you....so im just gonna say try less politics and more sports...it will do a body good

I'm with Peter in that I think the terminology is fan driven and ridiculous. I've been hearing the term 'Statement Game' since 2000 and it's just a ridiculous way of saying 'important win'.

ice grillin you

an important win was beating the rangers to get in the playoffs last year...or winning late in the year to clinch home ice would be important

beating tampa an upstart team who has owned your ass all year would be a statement win

and for the record i dont count last night as that...no shootout win can be considered making a statement
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Rome

So the statement they made last night is that they can give up a two goal lead on the road and then luck out in the end by winning a shootout?

Sounds like the same statement they've been making for three decades to me.

ice grillin you

i totally agree with that...in fact im not sure had they even won a 3-2 regulation game it would have been much of a statement since they would have been 1-3 vs tampa this year with tampa dominating a couple of the games

statement game would have been winning last time or beating them last night 6-1
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

PoopyfaceMcGee

So, it wasn't important and it wasn't a statement. Can we all just agree that it didn't even happen?

SD

Or better yet can we all agree to never use the term 'Statement Game' ever again?