Can we get a real defensive coordinator?

mpmcgraw · November 15, 2009, 08:47:39 PM

The Eagles have been very good against the run.

We KNOW that the linebackers are horrible.

So either Bunkley and Patterson are pretty damn good or you're a retard who thinks the opposing team running backs are just tripping over themselves.

ice grillin you · November 15, 2009, 08:48:30 PM

lol @ bunkley and patterson being "studs"...they are good dt's nothing less nothing more and are certainly not playmakers

mpmcgraw · November 15, 2009, 08:49:58 PM

Definitely not playmakers. Nasty against the run? Yeah they are. Their pass rush is relatively nonexistant, but they are definitely one of the best DT pairs in the NFL.

Rome · November 15, 2009, 08:50:06 PM

lol

The BIGSTUD · November 15, 2009, 08:51:17 PM

Bunkley gets a lot of push on the interior.

But I think we all know how good Igy and Rome's talent evaluation is. Just look at the Celek topic for reference.

Rome · November 15, 2009, 08:52:07 PM

Quote from: jihadist monk on November 15, 2009, 08:49:58 PM
Their pass rush is relatively nonexistant, but they are definitely one of the best DT pairs in the NFL.

So they can't rush the passer but they're one of the best DT pairs in the NFL?

I see.

ice grillin you · November 15, 2009, 08:53:48 PM

Quote from: jihadist monk on November 15, 2009, 08:49:58 PM
Definitely not playmakers. Nasty against the run? Yeah they are. Their pass rush is relatively nonexistant, but they are definitely one of the best DT pairs in the NFL.

no they arent nasty against anything...again they are fine tackles...but to call them studs or nasty is just retarded...and the linebackers suck but their "strength" is actually against the run...where they completely blow is in coverage and getting to the quarterback

mpmcgraw · November 15, 2009, 08:55:32 PM

Quote from: Rome on November 15, 2009, 08:52:07 PM
Quote from: jihadist monk on November 15, 2009, 08:49:58 PM
Their pass rush is relatively nonexistant, but they are definitely one of the best DT pairs in the NFL.

So they can't rush the passer but they're one of the best DT pairs in the NFL?

I see.

It would be great if they were great run stopping and pass rushing DT's, but you can count how many of them there are on one hand. So yea, they are one of the best combos.

ice grillin you · November 15, 2009, 08:58:49 PM

Quote from: jihadist monk on November 15, 2009, 08:55:32 PM
Quote from: Rome on November 15, 2009, 08:52:07 PM
Quote from: jihadist monk on November 15, 2009, 08:49:58 PM
Their pass rush is relatively nonexistant, but they are definitely one of the best DT pairs in the NFL.

So they can't rush the passer but they're one of the best DT pairs in the NFL?

I see.

It would be great if they were great run stopping and pass rushing DT's, but you can count how many of them there are on one hand. So yea, they are one of the best combos.

we you arent studs or nasty if you can only contribute in one aspect of the game

mpmcgraw · November 15, 2009, 08:59:57 PM

I said nasty against the run, which they are, not nasty in general.

ice grillin you · November 15, 2009, 09:04:16 PM

well fair enough but they arent even nasty against the run...in fact i barely ever notice them against the run...if youre nasty youre in the backfield all the time like a haynesworth wilfork tommie harris ngata ect...bunkley and patterson are so far below those guys level its not even funny

and im not even ripping them...im happy with their games and they are way down the list of things to even consider changing on the team...but just know what they are before you start going on and on about them

mpmcgraw · November 15, 2009, 09:06:31 PM

We'll see.

If they ever get a half decent cast around them we'll see what they really have.

Rome · November 15, 2009, 09:09:01 PM

Quote from: King Cole on November 15, 2009, 08:51:17 PM
Bunkley gets a lot of push on the interior.

But I think we all know how good Igy and Rome's talent evaluation is. Just look at the Celek topic for reference.

You mean like this bit of brilliance on your part?

QuoteKing Cole

« Reply #56 on: May 12, 2007, 11:11:06 PM »

I'm not saying he is or isn't going to be better than Patrick, but to claim he sucks without seeing him in at least one preseason game is ridiculous.

Clown.

shorebird · November 15, 2009, 10:34:45 PM

This conversation has gotten pretty darn nasty.

The BIGSTUD · November 16, 2009, 12:01:24 AM

Quote from: Rome on November 15, 2009, 09:09:01 PM
Quote from: King Cole on November 15, 2009, 08:51:17 PM
Bunkley gets a lot of push on the interior.

But I think we all know how good Igy and Rome's talent evaluation is. Just look at the Celek topic for reference.

You mean like this bit of brilliance on your part?

QuoteKing Cole

« Reply #56 on: May 12, 2007, 11:11:06 PM »

I'm not saying he is or isn't going to be better than Patrick, but to claim he sucks without seeing him in at least one preseason game is ridiculous.

Clown.

Are you stupid? I'm the only one who defended Celek in the topic and you are calling me a clown? Of course it is brilliance. As per usual for me. Everyone else called the guy a bust before he even stepped on the field. Don't come to a heavyweight debate against a heavyweight debater with featherweight material, little man.