Got to hand it to the FO - it's been a great offseason

Kenzinger · April 18, 2009, 10:51:53 AM

So far they've replaced the offensive tackles with Pro Bowl caliber OTs who are both under 30 years old, added the best available FB in free agency, added a promising young safety (Jones) plus depth at S and a strong ST player (Baker), and they still have 10 picks in the draft next weekend. If they come out of day 1 with a starting caliber RB and a TE, this offseason has got to be an A because they'll have completely rebuilt the OL with young talent and added weapons in the running game.

I'm usually trashing this FO but they've had a terrific offseason.

DH · April 18, 2009, 10:54:22 AM

I cant say I disagree, but get ready to be slammed for starting a new thread on this when there was a perfectly good offseason thread waiting to hear your input.

Kenzinger · April 18, 2009, 11:00:54 AM

Sorry, I'm new here and I'm not too bright.

rjs246 · April 18, 2009, 11:01:38 AM

I'm just happy that they let that bum Dawkins walk.

SD_Eagle5 · April 18, 2009, 11:06:18 AM

Let's see what they do Saturday before we start humping the f/o's leg. Letting Dawk go was just idiotic. Replacing two 35 year old Tackles with Pro Bowl caliber guys that are 27 is a good start. So far they get a B-.

Kenzinger · April 18, 2009, 11:40:25 AM

Quote from: SD_Eagle on April 18, 2009, 11:06:18 AM
Let's see what they do Saturday before we start humping the f/o's leg. Letting Dawk go was just idiotic. Replacing two 35 year old Tackles with Pro Bowl caliber guys that are 27 is a good start. So far they get a B-.

I hate to say it, but Dawkins had clearly lost a step and couldn't cover anyone.

I love the guy but his career was in steep decline and it was time to get younger.

mussa · April 18, 2009, 11:44:05 AM

its pretty damn hard to overlook the Dawkins thing and then no real attempt at acquiring a WR has also put a sour taste in my mouth. They have made some good moves, no doubt about it. I think if they can pull off some good moves next weekend and get some guys that look good, then I can get somewhat excited. When it comes down to it Andy Reid just makes me want to slaughter small children

mussa · April 18, 2009, 11:48:27 AM

Quote from: Kenzinger on April 18, 2009, 11:40:25 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on April 18, 2009, 11:06:18 AM
Let's see what they do Saturday before we start humping the f/o's leg. Letting Dawk go was just idiotic. Replacing two 35 year old Tackles with Pro Bowl caliber guys that are 27 is a good start. So far they get a B-.

I hate to say it, but Dawkins had clearly lost a step and couldn't cover anyone.

I love the guy but his career was in steep decline and it was time to get younger.

you get one thing and only one thing straight mr. brian darth dawkins is still the man. he should be an eagle still. don't let the anger go. cherish the anger. release that anger onto banner/lurie/reid face. kill them. kill them dead. if you do that we will accept you into this internet message board. now go do it

MDS · April 18, 2009, 12:02:54 PM

phreak?

SunMo · April 18, 2009, 12:49:10 PM

Let's not start sucking each other's dicks just yet.

Feva · April 18, 2009, 01:02:45 PM

Quote from: SunMo on April 18, 2009, 12:49:10 PM

Let's not start sucking each other's dicks just yet.

Yep.. I thought the exact same thing.

hbionic · April 18, 2009, 01:09:45 PM

I'm a bit appalled that your first thoughts would be to start sucking each others dicks.

Romes.

SunMo · April 18, 2009, 01:20:12 PM

i think our definition of 'appalled' is a bit different from yours

hbionic · April 18, 2009, 01:24:27 PM

Appalled. As in, "I was very appalled to hear that my girlfriend got her period this month". Appalled.

Eagaholic · April 18, 2009, 01:24:55 PM

Chuggies definition of appalled means - I'd like to watch please

Got to hand it to the FO - it's been a great offseason

SD_Eagle5