Analysis & Articles On The Picks

Started by PhillyPhreak54, April 27, 2008, 01:49:50 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

rjs246

Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

Seabiscuit36

I turned on 610 this morning, what an abortion of a radioshow. 
"For all the civic slurs, for all the unsavory things said of the Philadelphia fans, also say this: They could teach loyalty to a dog. Their capacity for pain is without limit." -Bill Lyons

Munson

610 is the pulse of the city! The pulse I say!
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 01, 2008, 05:10:48 PM
perhaps you could explain sd's reasons for "disliking" it as well since you seem to be so in tune with other peoples minds

BigEd76

Apparently Baldinger gave the draft a D on that CN8 sports show

reese125


ice grillin you

Quote from: BigEd76 on April 29, 2008, 10:09:08 AM
Apparently Baldinger gave the draft a D on that CN8 sports show


he destroyed it on angelos show this morning
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Rome

how do you give a draft a "d" where you got three potential immediate contributors on day one plus a #1 pick in next year's draft?  i wasn't happy about sunday's picks, but come on.

that's straight-up idiocy, imo.


troyhstewart

I listened to WIP on my home yesterday morning. They trashed the Eagles draft.  They may have had some questionable picks on day 2, but the fact is that the draft picks will be judged on how they perform, not on where they went to school or how well known the player is. I can't for the life of me understand how they were pissing and moaning about the trade from 19.  The pick was going to be a backup OT anyway so who gives a farg. And the dumbfargs crying about not picking Mendenhall must be mongoloids.

reese125

the #1 gripe is they traded out of the 1st to practically the end of the second. It makes it look like they are content with the team they have, and avoiding 1st rd pay to a player again

The other gripe is if the player you want is not there, you take the next player with best "value" that can ultimately help your team--(but next year picks is ultimately the best value). Many experts feel there were plenty of players before the 47th pick (?) that could of helped an 8-8 team this year. The Eagles did not do that, instead focusing on next year for the 2nd straight year

The only overall agreed upon player was Jackson

ice grillin you

Quote from: Rome on April 29, 2008, 10:41:51 AM
how do you give a draft a "d" where you got three potential immediate contributors on day one plus a #1 pick in next year's draft?  i wasn't happy about sunday's picks, but come on.

that's straight-up idiocy, imo.


you do know that just because the eagles say someone will contribute doesnt mean they will do so in a positve way...what would possibly excite you about trevor laws...like the eagles need another mini tackle...there is absolutely no guarantee the guy can contribute in the league at his size...charlie casserly is on wip right now saying he a poor mans mike patterson...you really think a poor mans mike patterson is gonna contribute a lot next year


the trade i totally agree with but i can also see how some people would rate this draft just on the players the eagles drafted and in that case they didnt do well at all imo
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Rome

i don't give a damn what the eagles say about the players they drafted and i don't base my opinions on their opinion or the clowns at wip.  i looked at the players the eagles selected and the draft picks they acquired and i formulated my own "grade" based on those criteria.  it's called independent analysis, igy.  you should try it some time instead of parroting someone else's opinion.  either that or stop relying on douchebags from wip to influence yours.


Wingspan

Quote from: Rome on April 29, 2008, 11:12:23 AM
i don't give a damn what the eagles say about the players they drafted and i don't base my opinions on their opinion or the clowns at wip.  i looked at the players the eagles selected and the draft picks they acquired and i formulated my own "grade" based on those criteria.  it's called independent analysis, igy.  you should try it some time instead of parroting someone else's opinion.  either that or stop relying on douchebags from wip to influence yours.



How were you able to attend all of their games or obtain all of that game footage?
Connection Problems

Sorry, SMF was unable to connect to the database. This may be caused by the server being busy. Please try again later.

reese125

You formulated you own "independent" analysis by other experts analysis and write ups. You have never seen any of those college players play. If Mel Kiper and all the others were saying and writing up trash about the players selected, you would disregard that? Shut your lips


PoopyfaceMcGee

If the Eagles had taken Mendenhall, the yahoos on WIP would be ripping the pick and saying it's a direct affront to the team's best player.

phattymatty

my personal draft grading formula is way too complicated to share with any of you yahoos.