Discuss: Concrete Ballin'

Started by Cerevant, March 13, 2008, 06:14:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 ... 19
User actions

PoopyfaceMcGee

#210
March 17, 2008, 08:43:42 PM
QuoteThe nitz played the learycm's team, and the nitz won, 91 - 0

MASSIVE JOHNSON

hbionic

#211
March 17, 2008, 08:48:51 PM
Straight up Ron Jeremy'd him!
I said watch the game and you will see my spirit manifest.-ILLEAGLE 02/04/05

Cerevant

#212
March 17, 2008, 08:54:13 PM Last Edit: March 17, 2008, 08:55:49 PM by Cerevant
At least you can see now why you aren't going up, so you won't feel like you are being cheated / bugged.

I think I finally wrung out the last of the punt & interception bugs.  Let me know if any turn up again.

No changes to the in-game calculations, mostly just fixing the field position screw ups on change of possession.  The football field was not created by a programmer :)

Yes, the game is designed for people's stats to cluster in the high 90's / low 100's.  I'm still deciding if that's good or bad.  If you have more than a 30 pt advantage in any one stat, it could get ugly.

I'm glad that it sounds like some people are having fun.  Looks like booting people out of the training room has livened things up a bit :)

Oh, and your streak cap does go up as you level.

Dio, you should be playing: Sus, Zanshin, Seabiscuit, Elwood, Munson, Sausage.  (Need a rankings page)

Munson said I could delete his account, but maybe I'll leave him there as a lvl 1 whipping boy for newbs. (Need an attack cap / XP adjustment for difficulty)
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

Diomedes

#213
March 17, 2008, 09:00:29 PM
Quote from: Cerevant on March 17, 2008, 08:54:13 PMMunson said I could delete his account, but maybe I'll leave him there as a lvl 1 whipping boy for newbs. (Need an attack cap / XP adjustment for difficulty)

Fatal-Combat has added a few NPCs. 
There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger

PoopyfaceMcGee

#214
March 17, 2008, 09:06:58 PM
So, which number am I trying to hit on my "roll of the dice" in order to actually build a stat category?

Diomedes

#215
March 17, 2008, 09:15:30 PM
Something greater than zero, loser.
There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger

Cerevant

#216
March 17, 2008, 10:41:33 PM
The first number is your stat, the second number is a random number between 1-100, and must be greater than the first number to get an increase.  The third number is how much you gained for that roll (between 1-5).
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

SunMo

#217
March 17, 2008, 10:56:16 PM
the OCD in me doesn't like the fact that the injury stat bar decreases from the left side down while all the others go down from the right side, but that obviously isn't a gameplay issue
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

hbionic

#218
March 18, 2008, 01:05:37 AM
Quote from: Cerevant on March 17, 2008, 10:41:33 PM
The first number is your stat, the second number is a random number between 1-100, and must be greater than the first number to get an increase.  The third number is how much you gained for that roll (between 1-5).

so what if my stat is over 100?

Will it ever gain?
I said watch the game and you will see my spirit manifest.-ILLEAGLE 02/04/05

Cerevant

#219
March 18, 2008, 05:49:15 AM
If your stat is greater than 95, you have to roll higher than 95. (5% chance)
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

phattymatty

#220
March 18, 2008, 06:43:21 AM
The SunMo played the Poopies?, and the Poopies? won, 56 - 0

Wingspan

#221
March 18, 2008, 10:05:58 AM
I played a game where I lost 77-0...and forfeited due to injury.

The realism was uncanny.
Connection Problems

Sorry, SMF was unable to connect to the database. This may be caused by the server being busy. Please try again later.

Seabiscuit36

#222
March 18, 2008, 10:17:02 AM
im done
"For all the civic slurs, for all the unsavory things said of the Philadelphia fans, also say this: They could teach loyalty to a dog. Their capacity for pain is without limit." -Bill Lyons

PoopyfaceMcGee

#223
March 18, 2008, 11:08:39 AM
Anyone scored more than this?
QuoteThe nitz played the learycm's team, and the nitz won, 98 - 0

BTW, I think Geo has quietly become #1 overall in stats.

Geowhizzer

#224
March 18, 2008, 11:34:02 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 18, 2008, 11:08:39 AM
Anyone scored more than this?
QuoteThe nitz played the learycm's team, and the nitz won, 98 - 0

BTW, I think Geo has quietly become #1 overall in stats.

Actually I'm quietly #3.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 ... 19
User actions