Fatal-Combat Discussion

Started by Diomedes, February 21, 2008, 07:43:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

PhillyPhanInDC

Quote from: mussa on February 28, 2008, 08:58:55 PM
Quote from: PPinDC on February 28, 2008, 08:51:46 PM
I'm still in a hotel room for anyone in a tenenment. I need a melee weapon, preferably a katana. I have 175k, where can I get a good melee, and what's it cost? I'm still rocking the Bullet Proof Vest and a Submachine gone. Oddly, I haven't gotten attacked in almost a week.

Damn! I just capped a Coke dealer and got 31% XP.

are you hitched big guy? i got a tenement. im offline for tonight, but tomorrow lets talk marriage if it'll help us out. night sweet cheeks

Word. I can rock you as my bitch for awhile. At least until IGY breaks down and games up. Let me know when you're ready to put on your leash. Oh, and I prefer jelly.
"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.""  R.I.P George.

Sgt PSN

I guess the game's all jacked up again because it's got me living in a hotel again after I just bought a townhouse and all of my money's still in my bank account.  I'm going to try and donate a bunch of the money to the gang and hopefully, when everything gets fixed, I get my townhouse back and the gang still has the cash I donated. 

Father Demon

The drawback to marital longevity is your wife always knows when you're really interested in her and when you're just trying to bury it.

4and26

Looks like we're OK ...I'm still online and loving the new place

Susquehanna Birder

I thought I proposed to Cerevant. I checked my events log, and it appears that I proposed to myself. Of course, I accepted! If only I could do that in real life!

QB Eagles

Quote from: Susquehanna Birder on February 28, 2008, 10:15:03 PM
I thought I proposed to Cerevant. I checked my events log, and it appears that I proposed to myself. Of course, I accepted! If only I could do that in real life!

Yeah, when you click to propose to someone, it puts your own ID in the box by default. Little bug in the program. Just type in Cerevant's id.

Susquehanna Birder

So I should divorce myself? It's such a sad thing!

mussa

So PPinDC has been nagging me to pop the question. He's got the better property. I got a tenement. Whats the best way to handle this? Do I sell and then propose? Do we share money and all that then too? Who gives and who receives? You know...

A quick overview would help. We're both too lazy to look back
Official Sponsor of The Fire Andy Reid Club
"We be plundering the High Sequence Seas For the hidden Treasures of Conservation"

Father Demon

You sell first.. If you marry then try to sell, your property will be gone.  No cash or nuthin.  Sell. Propose. Roll over and take it, since you're moving in his place.
The drawback to marital longevity is your wife always knows when you're really interested in her and when you're just trying to bury it.

mussa

10-4 Demon

I'm looking forward to a good reaming PPinDC. Tomorrows a big day
Official Sponsor of The Fire Andy Reid Club
"We be plundering the High Sequence Seas For the hidden Treasures of Conservation"

hbionic

scavanging sucks ass now. one or two steps and instant gang punkation. farg.
I said watch the game and you will see my spirit manifest.-ILLEAGLE 02/04/05


hbionic

sorry sunmo, i barely read the 'don't donate single items shtein to armory post'.... :paranoid


I just donated my riot shield to the gang for any of you who need it.

I'm rolling with the po-pos!
I said watch the game and you will see my spirit manifest.-ILLEAGLE 02/04/05


PoopyfaceMcGee

#1872
Quote from: hbionic on February 29, 2008, 03:37:56 AM
sorry sunmo, i barely read the 'don't donate single items shtein to armory post'.... :paranoid


I just donated my riot shield to the gang for any of you who need it.

I'm rolling with the po-pos!

I think he meant to stop donating hammers and used kevlar vests and shtein.

Quotekingzblend attacked you and lost.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAH

Update:
QuoteYou beat kingzblend and leave him on the ground. and gained 31% EXP!

Level 13 vs. Level 17.  I guess he's been doing a lot of empty leveling through fighting and crimes and not enough training.

Cerevant

#1873
My current stats:

Stats Info:
Strength: 2,572 [Ranked: 80]   Agility: 2,089 [Ranked: 65]
Guard: 887 [Ranked: 103]   Labour: 122 [Ranked: 186]
Combat: 377 [Ranked: 113]   Marksmanship: 2,097 [Ranked: 56]
IQ: 549 [Ranked: 73]   Total stats: 6,219 [Ranked: 88]

At the same level, Sgt Superman was kicking my ass 2 days ago.  I woke up this morning and I was level 10 and he was 12.  I said WTF and attacked him to see where I was at.  Smoked his ass & got 22% XP.  Hello level 11.

I forget who said it a couple of days ago, but I think they pretty much nailed it.  The tutorial is bullshtein:
To hit or to miss is: Combat (melee) or Marksmanship (gun) vs. Agility
Damage is: Strength vs. Guard

Weapons cap the damage, so better weapons don't help unless you have high enough strength.  I'm guessing the same is true for Armor, but I don't have anything to back that up.

I need someone to attack me with a melee weapon (preferably a hammer to ensure that there are enough rounds to see the result) to make sure you can still defend a melee attack with a gun.  If so, there is zero reason to put points into combat.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

Cerevant

Quote from: Susquehanna Birder on February 28, 2008, 10:15:03 PM
I thought I proposed to Cerevant. I checked my events log, and it appears that I proposed to myself. Of course, I accepted! If only I could do that in real life!

Alright loverboy, I just upgraded our digs, so go get a job or something.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.