Harry Potter doesn't die

Started by PoopyfaceMcGee, July 23, 2007, 10:30:42 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Beermonkey

Quote from: rjs246 on July 24, 2007, 10:00:05 AM
You're going to be inadequately prepared for the zombie apocalypse.

Glad I'm not the only one to think that way. I actually want one of these for my "man room" (basement)


Cerevant

Quote from: FastFreddie on July 23, 2007, 10:56:44 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on July 23, 2007, 10:41:33 AM
I appreciate the attempt at ruining the 'surprise' for all Harry Potter dorks. But this clearly doesn't need it's own topic.

Thanks, and I agree.  This thread can now be locked.

A+ for me.  C- for everyone else.


Yet still, you either read the book (very quickly), took the time to look for the spoiler, or hang out somewhere spoilers are posted.

Nerd.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

PoopyfaceMcGee

My brother-in-law looked it up on Wikipedia and volunteered the information without me having to do any research to find it.  Total nerdery!

ice grillin you

your nerdom was well established long ago
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Don Ho

Quote from: SunMo on July 23, 2007, 10:33:14 AM
unfortunately the same can be said for people older than 12 who waited in line to purchase the book

"Well where does Jack Lord live, or Don Ho?  That's got to be a nice neighborhood"  Jack Singer(Nicholas Cage) in Honeymoon in Vegas.

PoopyfaceMcGee


Cerevant

Quote from: FastFreddie on July 25, 2007, 01:05:42 PM
My brother-in-law looked it up on Wikipedia and volunteered the information without me having to do any research to find it.  Total nerdery!

Yeah - you couldn't have read it, since if you did you would have found a better spoiler than that.  Having just finished it myself (best of the series, BTW) this has to be the most "meh" surprise of the book.

Quote from: Zanshin on July 24, 2007, 08:48:33 AM
I'm tempted to pick one up just to see what the fuss is about.  I kind of don't get the whole phenomenon; sadly, that applies to many phenomena.

Don't forget that it is brain candy - this is not intended to be great literature.  The first three books are a bit formulaic, but the complexity and intensity rapidly ratchet up in the last 4.  As MMH points out, the last 3 are really PG-13.  One of the unique aspects of the series is that many of the fans got to grow up with the character, but now that all the books are out it will be harder to introduce the series to kids at an appropriate age without artificially dragging it out.

If you just want to find out what the fuss is about, I wouldn't bother reading all 7 - watch the first 3 movies and read the last 4 books.  The author made sure that none of the key bits of information were left out of the movies.  The 4th movie has all the necessary info, but there is some good storyline that had to be cut in the interest of time.  The last 3 movies will probably suck unless they are willing to cross the 3 hour barrier.

An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

Diomedes

I'll wait until there's a paperback set of all seven, then read 'em.
There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger

MadMarchHare

Order of the Phoenix was painfully rushed, skipped over a ton of shtein.  It was still a reasonably good film, but man.
Anyone but Reid.

Cerevant

The first few worked better on film because they were short, and because there wasn't enough back-story for the side plots to be relevant.  The forth worked because there was so much dead weight at the beginning of the book.  I was afraid that Order would be rushed and butchered.  I'll have to re-read the 6th book, but they might be able to make the last book work by compressing the slow middle.  There was a lot of effort put into a "here we go again" set up to emphasize the moment of epiphany where Harry finally gets his head out of his ass.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

MadMarchHare

Apparently neither does Voldemort:

Anyone but Reid.

ice grillin you

i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Feva

Quote from: FastFreddie on July 23, 2007, 10:30:42 AM
It appears he's dead near the end of the book... but he's not.  Lame.

I avoided opening this thread until I finished the book.  Now that I have:

1. Eat a fleshpop.

2. I'm going to deck your puss next time I see you.

3. Eat a fleshpop.
"Now I'm completing up the other half of that triangle" - Emmitt Smith on joining Troy Aikman and Michael Irvin in the Hall of Fame

"If you have sex with a prostitute against her will, is that considered rape or shoplifting?" -- 2 Live Stews

SunMo

wow...i never would've guessed.

I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

Feva

Yeah... black guys can read.
"Now I'm completing up the other half of that triangle" - Emmitt Smith on joining Troy Aikman and Michael Irvin in the Hall of Fame

"If you have sex with a prostitute against her will, is that considered rape or shoplifting?" -- 2 Live Stews