Political Hippo Circle Jerk - America, farg YEAH!

[PhillyGirl]

IGY, where did you see that Michigan is most likely having a PRIMARY?

From everything I've seen/read...they're most likely (almost 100% sure) having caucuses.

Tell me again who that would go for?

[PoopyfaceMcGee]

It won't matter, clearly, because Hillary will win Florida 80/20.  Duh.

[ice grillin you]

i havent seen anywhere that michigan wont have a primary...back before the first one there was a some talk of a whether they should have a caucus or primary....but they ended up having a primary then and by all accounts would have one again...im not even saying barry cant win a primary there but it would be an uphill battle

[PoopyfaceMcGee]

If this doesn't convince the naysayers that there is zero chance Hillary can win the pledged delegate count, nothing will:

OVERALL DELEGATE SCORECARD

Note that Hillary's "big day" on March 4 netted her a "whopping" SIX delegates more than Obama.  SIX.

[ice grillin you]

she cant win the delegate race.....this has been known for a few weeks...but again they are virtually irrelevant

[Cerevant]

Slate's delegate Calculator is even better - you can play "what if" scenarios until you are blue in the face.  (see my what-if on the last page for an example)

IGY, take a look at the quotes from the un-pledged  super delegates I posted before - the majority are saying they will vote with the people.  If Obama goes into the convention with a greater than 100 delegate lead, he gets the nom.  Even Hillary has all but admitted that by saying her strategy is to get the margin to less than that.

[ice grillin you]

let hillary win pennsie florida and michigan and see what they do...or let her continue to  destroy barry in public opinion over the next three months and see what happens...we have a long way to go and what they say now means nothing

not saying that will all happen but what the supers say they will do now does not mean anything in august

[Cerevant]

There is no way she wins all 3 states.  I'll put money on that.

[Rome]

why because i know hillary is the kind of person that would never take a back seat to anyone much less a newbie like barry...she is literally consumed in an unhealthy way to become president...and im not even sure its president i think she just wants to win and will do anything to do that...if in the end she loses no way in hell she takes second place as a vp to him

Tell me something I don't know.


i also think in the end she does win...shes the far superior politician and has more friends in higher places than barry...its sad that that is the way it is but its also true...unless he can win pennsyltucky florida or michigan and it doesnt appear he can do any of those then hes cooked

She's not going to win anything much less the general election.

you need to realize that youre allowed to say positive things about people you dont support and negative things about the people you do...otherwise you look pretty silly and cant be taken seriously on certain issues

There's nothing positive about Hillary Clinton.  Moreover, your continued insistence to suggest otherwise bespeaks your penchant for being argumentative and pigheaded to the point of idiocy than anything else, man.  Whatever, though.  Keep on keepin' on with the Hillary love, IGY.  We all know it's legitimate even if you continue to insist otherwise.

[ice grillin you]

im talking about things going positive for her in the campaign...not her personally being positive

your hate for her is akin to your boy eckels hate for the eagle FO...to the point where you are just losing it

[Rome]

My hate for her is a rational reaction to her complete loathsomeness.  Eckel's hate for the Eagles springs from their total rejection of him and his utter lack of objectivity in reporting on them.

Other than that, your comparison is balls-on accurate.

PS: Just come out and say it... you love Hillary and what she represents.  Not that it matters or that anyone here really cares, but just for the sake of total disclosure, at least admit it.

[ice grillin you]

im for barry always have been and always will be...but i also gotta call them like i see them...


you think youd be on board with eckel since he hates the eagles FO cause banner is basically a male version of hillary

[PoopyfaceMcGee]

i also gotta call them like i see them...

You at least should be honest and admit you call them in whichever way creates a more intriguing online argument.  Hell, if you weren't drumming for Hillary's legitimacy as a candidate, this thread would basically be a contest on who could give Obama the best virtual blow job.

[Rome]

Stop calling it like you see it, FF.

[ice grillin you]

i also gotta call them like i see them...

You at least should be honest and admit you call them in whichever way creates a more intriguing online argument.  Hell, if you weren't drumming for Hillary's legitimacy as a candidate, this thread would basically be a contest on who could give Obama the best virtual blow job.

no i call it the way i see it regardless of side..just cause i dont lean only one way like the rest of you doesnt mean i pick sides

the difference is i post positive and negative towards both people...i call them as they go...ive said the whole time that hillary is a force to be reckoned with..even when obama was winning 12 and a row i said it was not over regardless of delegates and all that...and that has proven to be the case...and because of that im pro hillary?