Irvin says Romo's athleticism due to black ancestry

The BIGSTUD · November 25, 2006, 08:09:21 PM

I play sports all the time, and have since I was a kid.

Hockey requires you to be tough, endure pain, and have stamina, but as far as raw athletic ability, you don't need a lot of it.

Case in point: Take the best NHL player and have them try to run and jump with the NBA's best athletes and they wouldn't be a fraction of their level.

Plus hockey is mainly a european sport anyway, and there aren't many blacks in europe and even russia where a lot of players come from too.

Father Demon · November 25, 2006, 08:19:10 PM

Trying... to... stay... a... way.....

Dude, you're a farging retard. No athleticism required? Have you ever tried deflecting a 100 MPH slapshut into the goal? The puck is smaller than a baseball, and the hockey blade is smaller than a bat. And the distance between the shot (compared to the throw) and the deflection (compared to the hit) is usually much slower.

Case in point: Take the best NBA player and have them try to skate frontwards, backwards, sideways, stop on a dime and reverse, all while guiding a frozen rubber puck on ice, AND getting hit pushed, held, hooked, and jostled and then wind up and shoot that puck into a net that's 3 feet tall and six feet wide while being blocked by a professional hockey goalie.

And to go back to that list, for you to say that none of them takes any physical skill, proves you are a closer relation to the chimpanzee than anyone else on this board. And you're not the quiet, cute kind of dumb like the retard mopping the floors at McDonald's either. You're the loud, boisterous, obnoxious kind of dumb that makes a great case as to why post-birth abortions should be legal.

Father Demon · November 25, 2006, 08:22:17 PM

Quote from: King Cole on November 25, 2006, 08:09:21 PM
I play sports all the time, and have since I was a kid.

Hockey requires you to be tough, endure pain, and have stamina, but as far as raw athletic ability, you don't need a lot of it.

Case in point: Take the best NHL player and have them try to run and jump with the NBA's best athletes and they wouldn't be a fraction of their level.

Plus hockey is mainly a european sport anyway, and there aren't many blacks in europe and even russia where a lot of players come from too.

Dude, using that argument, shouldn't the Kenyan Olympic Basketball team win all the gold medals? If all it takes is raw athleticism? farging CHINA placed 8th in the world in 2004? Please expound on the raw athleticism of the native Chinese, if you will.

Retard.
You.

Quasimoto · November 25, 2006, 08:56:37 PM

Why hasn't King Cole used the Cool Runnings argument yet!

phattymatty · November 25, 2006, 09:30:58 PM

baseball players more athletic than hockey players?

ok.

Father Demon · November 25, 2006, 09:40:49 PM

They must be. A lot of them are black, in case you didn't hear.

Geowhizzer · November 25, 2006, 09:49:56 PM

Donald Brashear is the most athletic hockey player EVER!

The BIGSTUD · November 25, 2006, 09:59:19 PM

Quote from: Father Demon on November 25, 2006, 08:19:10 PM
Trying... to... stay... a... way.....

Dude, you're a farging retard. No athleticism required? Have you ever tried deflecting a 100 MPH slapshut into the goal? The puck is smaller than a baseball, and the hockey blade is smaller than a bat. And the distance between the shot (compared to the throw) and the deflection (compared to the hit) is usually much slower.

Case in point: Take the best NBA player and have them try to skate frontwards, backwards, sideways, stop on a dime and reverse, all while guiding a frozen rubber puck on ice, AND getting hit pushed, held, hooked, and jostled and then wind up and shoot that puck into a net that's 3 feet tall and six feet wide while being blocked by a professional hockey goalie.

And to go back to that list, for you to say that none of them takes any physical skill, proves you are a closer relation to the chimpanzee than anyone else on this board. And you're not the quiet, cute kind of dumb like the retard mopping the floors at McDonald's either. You're the loud, boisterous, obnoxious kind of dumb that makes a great case as to why post-birth abortions should be legal.

lol, I've been burying you this whole argument and I was going to let you off, but you just made an ass out of yourself.

First of all you need to read. Two posts ago I said the NHL requires some athleticism, but not a lot. Secondly, your whole argument is moronic. First of all you are trying to prove to me, ignorantly at that, that whites are equally as athletic as blacks and quote some stupid opinionated SI.com article which isn't even fact to back up your case.

First of all, use your own opinions and not the opinions of others to back yourself up. I know it is hard to do when you don't know what you are talking about, but at least try. Secondly, what the hell do other sports even have to do with it anyway? If blacks bothered to even play hockey like basketball and football then they would be equally as good as white people. So the point you made is absolutely pointless.

Like I said the NHL is a white-dominated sport because of tradition. Countries like Russia, and countries in Europe are MAINLY WHITE. So this argument is moronic. Before using stupid arguments, it would help to ask yourself why something might be the case so I don't have to bury you like I am now and have been.

So if you actually have an argument and don't want to be a little girl and back out of the argument(as I see you've made an out already in case you can't handle it) then please tell me how the hell you figure whites and blacks(generally) are equally athletic. Just in case you didn't read, I used the word generally, because obviously this doesn't apply to every person in a group of people.

So if you could explain to me why a sport like basketball, which requires the most athleticism out of any sport, is dominated by black athletes? Go ahead and run me down some extremely athletic players in the NBA and NFL and lets see if they compare to the most athletic black players.

Take a stab at it.

Feva · November 25, 2006, 10:22:15 PM

Quote from: King Cole on November 25, 2006, 09:59:19 PM
Quote from: Father Demon on November 25, 2006, 08:19:10 PM
Trying... to... stay... a... way.....

Dude, you're a farging retard. No athleticism required? Have you ever tried deflecting a 100 MPH slapshut into the goal? The puck is smaller than a baseball, and the hockey blade is smaller than a bat. And the distance between the shot (compared to the throw) and the deflection (compared to the hit) is usually much slower.

Case in point: Take the best NBA player and have them try to skate frontwards, backwards, sideways, stop on a dime and reverse, all while guiding a frozen rubber puck on ice, AND getting hit pushed, held, hooked, and jostled and then wind up and shoot that puck into a net that's 3 feet tall and six feet wide while being blocked by a professional hockey goalie.

And to go back to that list, for you to say that none of them takes any physical skill, proves you are a closer relation to the chimpanzee than anyone else on this board. And you're not the quiet, cute kind of dumb like the retard mopping the floors at McDonald's either. You're the loud, boisterous, obnoxious kind of dumb that makes a great case as to why post-birth abortions should be legal.

lol, I've been burying you this whole argument and I was going to let you off, but you just made an ass out of yourself.

First of all you need to read. Two posts ago I said the NHL requires some athleticism, but not a lot. Secondly, your whole argument is moronic. First of all you are trying to prove to me, ignorantly at that, that whites are equally as athletic as blacks and quote some stupid opinionated SI.com article which isn't even fact to back up your case.

First of all, use your own opinions and not the opinions of others to back yourself up. I know it is hard to do when you don't know what you are talking about, but at least try. Secondly, what the hell do other sports even have to do with it anyway? If blacks bothered to even play hockey like basketball and football then they would be equally as good as white people. So the point you made is absolutely pointless.

Like I said the NHL is a white-dominated sport because of tradition. Countries like Russia, and countries in Europe are MAINLY WHITE. So this argument is moronic. Before using stupid arguments, it would help to ask yourself why something might be the case so I don't have to bury you like I am now and have been.

So if you actually have an argument and don't want to be a little girl and back out of the argument(as I see you've made an out already in case you can't handle it) then please tell me how the hell you figure whites and blacks(generally) are equally athletic. Just in case you didn't read, I used the word generally, because obviously this doesn't apply to every person in a group of people.

So if you could explain to me why a sport like basketball, which requires the most athleticism out of any sport, is dominated by black athletes? Go ahead and run me down some extremely athletic players in the NBA and NFL and lets see if they compare to the most athletic black players.

Take a stab at it.

Ha! You said "First of all", three times... dumbass.

Munson · November 25, 2006, 10:25:42 PM

Black people have an extra calf muscle so they can out-run the lions and stuff.

The BIGSTUD · November 25, 2006, 10:38:36 PM

mpmcgraw · November 25, 2006, 10:42:37 PM

Yes, we all love imp awards.com .

Father Demon · November 25, 2006, 10:50:02 PM

I'm not arguing with you. Retards never know when they are wrong, so it's pointless. I'll just point and laugh at you like everyone else.

Also, solid point:

Quote from: King Cole on November 25, 2006, 10:38:36 PM

The BIGSTUD · November 26, 2006, 01:22:08 AM

That's what I thought. Chalk another win up for KC.

Diomedes · November 26, 2006, 09:32:50 AM

Arguing about which sport is more athletic has nothing to do with the issue at hand. Nor is the question of whether blacks are more athletic--a ludicrous line of inquiry--germane to this subject. The questions are:

Is it alright for Irvin to suggest an athletic white guy owes his physical prowess to one of his ancestors mating with a slave?

Is it alright for Irvin to suggest a white guy's family used to own slaves?

Answer is no.

Next question is, what's going to happen? Is Irvin gonna be allowed to skate without fanfare? Will he just say he's sorry and things will go on as usual?

There is no doubt that if he were white, this would have blown up into a huge issue already.