Around The NFL -- Week 11

Started by PhillyPhreak54, November 19, 2006, 11:56:03 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

The BIGSTUD

It is a shame the Eagles had to suck in a year where the NFC is as bad as ever.
Calling it right on the $ since day one.
Just pointing laughing, and living it up while watching the Miami Heat stink it up.

rjs246

Quote from: King Cole on November 21, 2006, 12:02:25 AM
It is a shame the Eagles had to suck in a year where the NFC is as bad as ever.

Don't forget that they sucked last year and will probably suck next year as well.
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

QB Eagles

Yeah can't these other farging NFC teams hurry up and mathematically eliminate the Eagles already? Jesus. No need to drag this out.

The BIGSTUD

If they don't make major changes they will suck next year too, absolutely.
Calling it right on the $ since day one.
Just pointing laughing, and living it up while watching the Miami Heat stink it up.

BigEd76

#49
Interesting note from the Houston Chronicle:

QuoteIt appears the NFL has found a copy of one of television's great lost treasures — a copy of Super Bowl I. No details on the quality of the tape or whether it's the NBC or CBS broadcast.

The game was shown on both CBS (NFL) and NBC (AFL) and each network used their own announcers, but the video feed was CBS's on both stations.  For decades it was believed that no full copy of the game existed because each network taped over their copy.  Good stuff if true...

rjs246

Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

Cerevant

Quote from: QB Eagles on November 21, 2006, 12:15:51 AM
Yeah can't these other farging NFC teams hurry up and mathematically eliminate the Eagles already? Jesus. No need to drag this out.

Good god - no one wants to win the NFC East.  Even in their curren tailspin, the Eagles are 1 game out of first place.  Go AJ.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

Diomedes

Quote from: rjs246 on November 20, 2006, 11:32:35 PMUnderstood. However, it should still be allowed and banning it is farging mindless bullshtein.

^^^^
yep.

they could allow suits and gain a lot of great publicity for it, and make the coaches happier
or
they could contract to brand a line of suits which they allow coaches to wear.  a hip designer would salivate at the opportunity, and the amount of money that people spend on authentics and throwbacks guarantees that if the suit looks good, people will pay for one of their own.

both are viable, both would make the NFL better.  they'd rather take a facial from Reebok/Nike with every camera shot.
There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger