RUNYAN RESIGNED!!

PoopyfaceMcGee · March 25, 2006, 11:38:41 AM

Quote from: rjs246 on March 25, 2006, 11:36:34 AM
Quote from: FFatPatt on March 25, 2006, 11:25:54 AM
I know the proper grammar with quotes but dislike it, so I always put the punctuation outside if I think it works better.

If I am quoting someone, quotes go outside the punctuation. If I am emphasising a word, quotes go inside. I don't know if those jive with the official rules, but those are my rules and they rule accordingly.

Yes.

Rome · March 25, 2006, 11:38:43 AM

Your rules suck.

Cram it high, hard and deep motherfarger.

DH · March 25, 2006, 11:56:23 AM

My rules rule.

PoopyfaceMcGee · March 25, 2006, 12:07:42 PM

Quote from: Jerome99RIP on March 25, 2006, 11:38:43 AM
Cram it high, hard and deep motherfarger.

Should I go to a "Go-Go Bar" to do that?

Sgt PSN · March 25, 2006, 01:21:35 PM

Quote from: rjs246 on March 25, 2006, 11:36:34 AM
Quote from: FFatPatt on March 25, 2006, 11:25:54 AM
I know the proper grammar with quotes but dislike it, so I always put the punctuation outside if I think it works better.

If I am quoting someone, quotes go outside the punctuation. If I am emphasising a word, quotes go inside. I don't know if those jive with the official rules, but those are my rules and they rule accordingly.

Those are my rules too. And by "too" I really mean "also".

PoopyfaceMcGee · March 25, 2006, 01:24:11 PM

Since you used the proper spelling of "too", there was no need to explain that you meant "also".

If you used it in the context of "What are you listening too?", then you'd have to clarify... because not only would you have ended a sentence with a preposition, but you didn't even spell the preposition properly. Bang.

Sgt PSN · March 25, 2006, 01:28:47 PM

Yeah, yeah, yeah. I just wanted to emphasize the fact that I like putting periods outside of quotation marks. And by "Yeah, yeah, yeah" I really mean "Eat my ass".

Better?

Drunkmasterflex · March 25, 2006, 01:35:24 PM

This move was much needed for this offseason, this should really help with their flexibility in the first round of the draft.

PoopyfaceMcGee · March 25, 2006, 01:36:28 PM

Kamerion Wimbley.

Drunkmasterflex · March 25, 2006, 01:41:11 PM

Quote from: FFatPatt on March 25, 2006, 01:36:28 PM
Kamerion Wimbley.

What do you want him for?

PoopyfaceMcGee · March 25, 2006, 02:05:36 PM

It's not as much that I want him as I think he's a likely target if Bunkley's gone.

I explained my reasoning in the "mocks" thread. I think the Eagles would have him 4th on their DL board behind Mario Williams, Haloti Ngata, and Bunkley. He fits the mold of what the Eagles want in a DE.

PoopyfaceMcGee · March 25, 2006, 04:12:27 PM

Oh, and also throw in the fact that if Jevon Kearse doesn't produce big-time this year, they probably would like to end his contract prematurely no later than before the 2008 season.

They might rate Manny Lawson as the same type of player as Wimbley too... and he might be higher on their board.

troyhstewart · March 25, 2006, 04:34:13 PM

Quote from: FFatPatt on March 25, 2006, 04:12:27 PM
Oh, and also throw in the fact that if Jevon Kearse doesn't produce big-time this year, they probably would like to end his contract prematurely no later than before the 2008 season.

They might rate Manny Lawson as the same type of player as Wimbley too... and he might be higher on their board.

I can't believe the fact that you're pimping two 245 lb hybrid LB/DEs in the first round , yet you want no part of Tamba Hali. I've been saying they need to look at this type of player in round 3 or 4, but not round 1. If Hali slips to round 2, I'd rather have him or Darryl Tapp. There are much bigger needs in the 1st round than a smallish DE.

PoopyfaceMcGee · March 25, 2006, 04:48:18 PM

I like Darryl Tapp a lot, but he will go in the late 1st or very early 2nd IMO. I think Hali will be garbage on an NFL level, as I've said the whole off-season. I'm a PSU alum and huge fan, too.

Saying there are bigger needs than a "smallish" DE might be true, but picking for need is not something I see the Eagles doing. I should also throw in that if Jimmy Williams or Michael Huff happen to fall to #14, the Eagles could most certainly jump on one of them. Keep in mind that they consider DE and DB to be extremely high positions of value, probably #2 and #3 after QB.

That said, if Bunkley's there at #14, he's in midnight green. I just think he probably will be gone and the Eagles will not rate him highly enough to trade up.

troyhstewart · March 25, 2006, 11:09:55 PM

we disagree about Hali.

I would say the Eagles rank O-line and D-line ahead of DB. I would agree if Bunkley's gone and WIlliams or Huff were there, the Eagles would probably take them, I would.

If the players they covet aren't there, I'd hope they would at least look at trading down and adding more picks rather than IMO reaching for a player like Wimbley or Lawson who would seem better suited to a 3-4.