What if the goal has changed?

[Eagles 3x]

I think the current Eagles FO and decision-makers is always looking toward having the best chance to win over the next 5+ years instead of going all-out to win in the present year.  I think the goal's always been to have long-term success at the possible cost of shorter-term veteran depth and success.

I love the philosophy, and I also hate it.

The end of this quote really sums it up.   
We're (Eagles) are winners but in a league of 32 teams with millions to spends it's also  a business.   It's hard to stay on top but the Eagles do that.    Making a run to the SB every year is just well simply impossible.
Yet were here, we chat and we beleive.

Yet were here, we chat and we beleive.

Appalling.

and still, here we are. and here we will be.

[ice grillin you]

the Eagles will spend top dollar if they think the player is worth it.

this is where i have a problem...there has to be a middle ground...somewhere btwn the archulettas and the bentlys 

you have to be able to seperate the players individual worth to that of his worth to the team

using a 1-10 scale...if you have a positon on your team that you currently rate a 2 and theres a player out there that you rate a 7 you may pay him 9 or 10 money because youre upgrading the position on the field exponentially even tho the player himself may not be worth that kind of dollar

[PoopyfaceMcGee]

The Eagles don't have any 2's.  Greg Richmond = 7.