Darren Howard visits today.

PoopyfaceMcGee · March 13, 2006, 09:21:35 AM

Yeah, cause we know how well Saunders was able to feature 3 different receivers in Kansas City. Ha.

ice grillin you · March 13, 2006, 09:34:29 AM

i agree the lloyd move is at best curious...lloyd just isnt that good which is why i believe he is the #3 guy...but the way i understand it is that all three will be interchangable parts...patten isnt even in the mix

Feva · March 13, 2006, 09:42:01 AM

Lloyd is a better receiver than Randle El. Lloyd was the only bright spot on an otherwise dismal Niners offense. I just find it hard to see Randle El being a higher priority on offense. I mean, Lloyd had almost as many TD's last year (5) as Randle El's had his entire career (7).

phattymatty · March 13, 2006, 09:46:36 AM

Quote from: bobbyinlondon on March 13, 2006, 08:52:40 AM
Randle El was saying before FA that he wanted to go to a team where he would be the No.2--the Bears offered him that chance, but he turned down a 6 year, 18M contract from his hometown team. Unless the Skins cut David Patten, he'll BE NO BETTER THAN A No.4 and a punt returner.

I think you're giving the skins receivers too much credit. you think there are 3 wrs on the team better than randle-el?

ice grillin you · March 13, 2006, 09:54:53 AM

Lloyd is a better receiver than Randle El. Lloyd was the only bright spot on an otherwise dismal Niners offense. I just find it hard to see Randle El being a higher priority on offense. I mean, Lloyd had almost as many TD's last year (5) as Randle El's had his entire career (7).

lloyd is not even close to as good as randal el...lloyd is all style and no substance...hes had numbers last year because the 49ers were so bad not because hes any good

watch randal el when he gets more opportunities this season than he has his whole career combined...hes not a number one guy but hes a playmaker who is going to have real nice numbers and really help the skins as their wr's outside of moss were pathetic

PoopyfaceMcGee · March 13, 2006, 10:10:13 AM

Officially reported on PhiladelphiaEagles.com...

6-year deal as speculated, 1PM press confererence to announce

SunMo · March 13, 2006, 10:11:39 AM

the last time the Eagles signed a DE free agent, they traded for a disgruntled receiver on the same day.... hmmmm

PhillyPhreak54 · March 13, 2006, 10:12:19 AM

Quote from: Sun_Mo on March 13, 2006, 10:11:39 AM
the last time the Eagles signed a DE free agent, they traded for a disgruntled receiver on the same day.... hmmmm

GET WALKER!

PoopyfaceMcGee · March 13, 2006, 10:13:04 AM

Quote from: Sun_Mo on March 13, 2006, 10:11:39 AM
the last time the Eagles signed a DE free agent, they traded for a disgruntled receiver on the same day.... hmmmm

Lies. The T.O. trade took another week or so to go through.

PhillyGirl · March 13, 2006, 10:13:31 AM

One of the funniest weeks EVER on

PoopyfaceMcGee · March 13, 2006, 10:16:20 AM

At least we know this time that if Walker is traded somewhere else, he's actually staying there. There is no ambiguity as to whether or not Walker should be a free agent. He's not. He's property of the Packers, and you better believe that there is a team out there, hopefully the Eagles, that will change that.

ice grillin you · March 13, 2006, 10:30:00 AM

a cat is on wip right now talking about the hollis/pick for walker deal

saying green bay really needs a dt...like hollis is the answer to those troubles

sometimes i really really hate the internet

RezRob · March 13, 2006, 10:33:25 AM

Quote from: ice grillin you on March 13, 2006, 10:30:00 AM
saying green bay really needs a dt...like hollis is the answer to those troubles

GB fans would crucify Ted Thompson if that trade went through. I still got love for Hollis. When he's healthy he gets the job done.

mussa · March 13, 2006, 10:34:26 AM

so what howard is signed?

rjs246 · March 13, 2006, 10:36:25 AM

Has anyone heard anything about Darren Howard? Are the Eagles gonna sign him or what?