New El Stop: Broad and Pattison?

ice grillin you · February 24, 2006, 10:38:03 AM

randel el is not multitalented

WTF?

mussa · February 24, 2006, 10:43:44 AM

Quote from: Wingspan on February 24, 2006, 10:31:49 AM
randel el is not multitalented. he's pretty 1 dimesional...which is why he's only a #3 guy.

your mixing your mind with his talents now.

ARE YOU fargIN KIDDING ME!!??!!

Wingspan · February 24, 2006, 10:47:27 AM

Quote from: Sun_Mo on February 24, 2006, 10:32:40 AM
Quote from: Wingspan on February 24, 2006, 10:31:49 AM
randel el is not multitalented. he's pretty 1 dimesional...which is why he's only a #3 guy.

he was a #2 for pittsburgh, he can catch, run, throw, return punts. that's a huge dimension if he's only 1 dimensional

the ability to run is something that all WRs can do. no one is signing him as QB. is he a deep threat? no. is he a possession guy? only 35 catches last year say differently.

sorry...i've just never been overly impressed with the guy.

and this season he was made a #3 guy. Ward and Cedric Wilson were the starters. he's a one dimensional gimmick player. he'd make a nice addition to any team, sure. but he's not a starting WR, or even a very consistant or reliable backup. someone will grossly overpay him.

he's nothing more than what az-hakin was a few years ago when everyone wanted him.,

Rome · February 24, 2006, 10:51:57 AM

The only thing similar between az-hakim and Randle-El are the hyphens in their names.

ice grillin you · February 24, 2006, 10:52:02 AM

you can say he will get overpaid and you dont want him...but you cannot say he isnt multi demensional

being a great kick returner and a good WR automatically makes him multidemesional

VET STADIUM TURF · February 24, 2006, 10:53:28 AM

I don't think the Eagles are going after Randle El anymore. Listen to Spadaro on Eagles Live or that stupid Todd Pinkston article. He's back tracking on WR big time. I know one thing, they better get one in here. Pinkston who has the same injury Julian Peterson had will most likely not be the same this year. It's said it takes 2 years to fully recover.

ice grillin you · February 24, 2006, 10:54:31 AM

Listen to Spadaro

NO!

VET STADIUM TURF · February 24, 2006, 10:56:29 AM

Wingspan · February 24, 2006, 10:58:10 AM

Quote from: ice grillin you on February 24, 2006, 10:52:02 AM
you can say he will get overpaid and you dont want him...but you cannot say he isnt multi demensional

being a great kick returner and a good WR automatically makes him multidemesional

randel el returned 1 kick off. last season. PR and KR are different.

and there is no hyphen in his name.

there;s at least 6 other WRs out there that i would rather have than randel el. i dont hate the guy. nor would i not look at him. but i dont think he's the best option available.

BigEd76 · February 24, 2006, 11:21:48 AM

Quote from: VET STADIUM TURF on February 24, 2006, 10:53:28 AMListen to Spadaro on Eagles Live or that stupid Todd Pinkston article. He's back tracking on WR big time.

Not really. He still thinks they're going to go after one in free agency. Whether that's a priority over DT, DE and OLB, we'll see...

The BIGSTUD · February 24, 2006, 03:36:14 PM

I don't want Randle El. I hope the Bears offer him a huge deal so the Eagles back off. Give me Moulds easily over Randle El.

Diomedes · February 24, 2006, 07:37:02 PM

Quote from: Wingspan on February 24, 2006, 10:58:10 AMthere;s at least 6 other WRs out there that i would rather have than randel el.

Oh, yeah? Name 'em.

The BIGSTUD · February 24, 2006, 07:57:50 PM

I'm not speaking for him, but I can name a handful of guys I'd rather have than Randle El.

Moulds, Jurevicius, Bryant, and if Coles is cut like rumors say is a possibility then definitely Coles.

Diomedes · February 24, 2006, 07:59:13 PM

Try to stick to names that are actually available. Of course you'd rather have Coles. Who wouldn't??

The BIGSTUD · February 24, 2006, 08:03:35 PM

That's 1 out of 4 names that isn't in the realm of possibility yet. The other 3 are.

You can add Burleson too, but he's restricted, and possibly Mccardell. I'm not high on them as much as I am down on Randle El. I just think as a receiver he's just another guy. I'd rather have someone who's great at one thing than a jack of all trades like Randle El.