Kiper's Latest Mock Draft

ice grillin you · February 01, 2006, 11:26:06 AM

if you want people to stop treating you like a nonsensical pompous ass, all you have to do is stop acting like a nonsensical pompous ass

'people' = you and

Zanshin · February 01, 2006, 11:27:22 AM

If you believe that, you're also delusional. Congrats!

Rome · February 01, 2006, 11:28:39 AM

Quote from: Sun_Mo on February 01, 2006, 11:13:53 AM
i would agree, but do you think that this Oline is buttoned up?

Not now it's not. Again, what happens in free agency is all important this year.

If they can't address the holes they have in the line that way, then I'm all for drafting linemen, just not in the first round.

I think that's a major mistake when skill position players are available who could make a more immediate impact.

ice grillin you · February 01, 2006, 11:36:48 AM

If you believe that, you're also delusional. Congrats!

really i dont care...isnt there a filter or something on the board??

MDS · February 01, 2006, 11:49:37 AM

if tamba hali is there and we dont draft him ill kill andy reid with an ice pick

ice grillin you · February 01, 2006, 11:52:20 AM

fo rilla??

rjs246 · February 01, 2006, 12:04:36 PM

None of the mid-first round DEs really do much for me personally, which is part of why I'd be fine with an OT. DT, LB, OL and DE are the biggest need IMO. Best talent from those positions should get the nod.

phattymatty · February 01, 2006, 12:18:24 PM

i'll be just as disappointed if they pick an o-lineman this year in the first as i was when they picked andrews. having a good line is overrated.

rjs246 · February 01, 2006, 12:33:15 PM

Quotehaving a good line is overrated.

You're joking right? I'm assuming you're joking.

PoopyfaceMcGee · February 01, 2006, 12:38:48 PM

That's the wondrousness of matth: You never know.

rjs246 · February 01, 2006, 12:44:36 PM

I was disappointed when they drafted Andrews as well b/c I wanted Steven Jackson, not because I think OL is overrated. And based on the zesty protection the line gave this year OL is definitely a need.

Feva · February 01, 2006, 12:47:04 PM

I agree that it's definitely a need, especially on the edges... but should there be an impact player available that addresses the front 7, I want to go there first.

PoopyfaceMcGee · February 01, 2006, 12:48:14 PM

Kind of ironic that the questionable quality of the Andrews pick at #15 is one of the reasons taking an OL at #14 this year is actually not an awful idea. Andrews showed why he fell out of the top ten by fattening up to 370+ and proving that he may never be elite and may never be able to move to tackle.

rjs246 · February 01, 2006, 12:50:20 PM

They should just trade all of the bazillion low-round picks for as many 1st 2nd and 3rd round picks as they can get. They'll probably get a compensation pick or three for the free agents that left, giving them their requisite project picks in the late rounds. I'd rather have 4-6 rookies with real talent than 11 rookies who might as well be crash test dummies.

PoopyfaceMcGee · February 01, 2006, 12:52:29 PM

Quote from: rjs246 on February 01, 2006, 12:50:20 PM
They should just trade all of the bazillion low-round picks for as many 1st 2nd and 3rd round picks as they can get. They'll probably get a compensation pick or three for the free agents that left, giving them their requisite project picks in the late rounds. I'd rather have 4-6 rookies with real talent than 11 rookies who might as well be crash test dummies.

That sounds like an idea you could actually execute in Madden.