TO Press Conference at 3

Started by PhillyandBCEagles, November 08, 2005, 02:18:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3 4 ... 17
User actions

Wingspan

#15
November 08, 2005, 02:49:20 PM
GET YUR POPCRN RDY!!
Connection Problems

Sorry, SMF was unable to connect to the database. This may be caused by the server being busy. Please try again later.

Cerevant

#16
November 08, 2005, 02:50:00 PM
On WIP, they are saying that TO is going to read a short statement, Rosenfarger is going to make a statement, then Rosenshteinpile is going to answer questions.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

stillupfront

#17
November 08, 2005, 02:51:30 PM
Quote from: Cerevant on November 08, 2005, 02:50:00 PM
On WIP, they are saying that TO is going to read a short statement, Rosenfarger is going to make a statement, then Rosenshteinpile is going to answer questions.

Don't you wish Stutterin' John from the "old Howard Stern show" was available for this PC?


1/9/06


Very proud sponsor of DarWIN Walker BSSE

Proud to be sponsored by HBionic

MadMarchHare

#18
November 08, 2005, 02:53:35 PM
 :-D

Drew:  OK, TO, I know this is hard, but try to keep your big, stupid mouth shut, OK?  Christ, you make my job 10 times harder, dumb ass!

TO:  I LUV ME SUM ME!
Anyone but Reid.

Cerevant

#19
November 08, 2005, 02:55:50 PM
Quote from: MadMarchHare on November 08, 2005, 02:53:35 PM
:-D

Drew:  OK, TO, I know this is hard, but try to keep your big, stupid mouth shut, OK?  Christ, you make my job 10 times harder, dumb ass!

TO:  I LUV ME SUM ME!

I have to admit this sounds like damage control...they might be taking the "forgive me" route, and Drewless is trying to keep TO from farging things up.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

stillupfront

#20
November 08, 2005, 02:57:20 PM
We need hecklers!!!


1/9/06


Very proud sponsor of DarWIN Walker BSSE

Proud to be sponsored by HBionic

Father Demon

#21
November 08, 2005, 02:57:44 PM
Quote from: Cerevant on November 08, 2005, 02:55:50 PM
Quote from: MadMarchHare on November 08, 2005, 02:53:35 PM
:-D

Drew:  OK, TO, I know this is hard, but try to keep your big, stupid mouth shut, OK?  Christ, you make my job 10 times harder, dumb ass!

TO:  I LUV ME SUM ME!

I have to admit this sounds like damage control...they might be taking the "forgive me" route, and Drewless is trying to keep TO from farging things up.

I'd put money on it that you are right...
The drawback to marital longevity is your wife always knows when you're really interested in her and when you're just trying to bury it.

Feva

#22
November 08, 2005, 02:57:50 PM
TO - "I would just like to say that still, I LUV ME SUM ME... and now, my agent Drew."

Drew - "We are currently considering which organizations would like for TO to love him some him for their team next season."
"Now I'm completing up the other half of that triangle" - Emmitt Smith on joining Troy Aikman and Michael Irvin in the Hall of Fame

"If you have sex with a prostitute against her will, is that considered rape or shoplifting?" -- 2 Live Stews

Rome

#23
November 08, 2005, 02:59:50 PM
There's a chance I could care less about this dog and pony show.

Not much of one, but still... a chance.

:-o

MadMarchHare

#24
November 08, 2005, 02:59:53 PM
Keep us out of towners posted ;D
Anyone but Reid.

hbionic

#25
November 08, 2005, 03:00:40 PM
OK, its twelve....er....3pm....has it started?
I said watch the game and you will see my spirit manifest.-ILLEAGLE 02/04/05

Cerevant

#26
November 08, 2005, 03:01:41 PM
Nope - he's not on yet.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

hbionic

#27
November 08, 2005, 03:02:21 PM
Quote from: Cerevant on November 08, 2005, 03:01:41 PM
Nope - he's not on yet.

Thanks C. Please continue farging dallas.

...and we pray! :evil
I said watch the game and you will see my spirit manifest.-ILLEAGLE 02/04/05

Diomedes

#28
November 08, 2005, 03:02:46 PM
For those of us who can't hear or see this fiasco, those of you who can please to update you will?
There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger

Cerevant

#29
November 08, 2005, 03:03:00 PM
They are saying 10 minutes
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3 4 ... 17
User actions