Anyone seen a good movie lately?

Started by henchmanUK, December 09, 2004, 11:44:05 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

SunMo

it would be an absolute waste of a character to have killed two-face off at the end of that movie
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

rjs246

Quote from: Magical_Retard on July 28, 2008, 07:03:31 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on July 27, 2008, 06:39:55 PM
That's stupid. What was the point of Two Face kidnapping Gordon's family if his character is dead. It just added dead weight to the end of the movie... I'm not buying it.

huh? he kidnapped the family to make gordon pay for what he believes lead to rachel's death.

he was killed as the result of batman trying to save the boy.

i think without the scene where dent holds gordon's family hostage the central point of "sometimes ppl need to have their faith restored" would be lost. it shows how far dent went to seek revenge. how far he went from what he used to be. if you end the movie with just the joker being caught it brings no finale to the character of dent. and nolan made this movie not with a sequel in mind but to have a self contained film.


Maybe I'm missing something but this explanation makes absolutely no sense to me. And hence, I'm still not buying it.
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

Magical_Retard

Quote from: SunMo on July 28, 2008, 07:09:34 PM
it would be an absolute waste of a character to have killed two-face off at the end of that movie

well in the comics dent has multiple personalities, has acid thrown on his face, has his abusive past revealed, becomes two face, and then a mob boss.

nolan definitely was not going for that two face. dents sole motivation at the end is to get revenge. the joker convinces him that while he kidnapped rachel, it was the "planners" and "schemers" like batman, gordon, and dent himself who led to her demise. he convinces dent that it was their fault. at the end hes out for revenge. kills maroni because he let the joker (mad dog) lose. the final scene has batman and gordon in front of him. he flips the coin for batman and shoots him. he flips the coin for himself (since the joker convinced him he was at fault too) and it comes up head so he doesn't kill himself. for gordon he wants him to suffer like he did with the loss of his loved one, so he takes the son to kill in case the coin lands on the burnt side.

he kidnaps only to draw out gordon and batman. not because he is going to become some super villain like in the comics. his arc and story ends when his revenge quest is finished. it fits perfectly for the movie because that was the jokers ultimate goal. to show batman and gordon that even the best of them could be brought down to his level of evil. that gothams hero (dent) could be turned bad. having dent die and then batman take all the blame destroys all that bruce was really working towards.
Marge: I have someone who can help you!
Homer: Is it BATMAN!!??
Marge: No hes a scientist
Homer: Batman is a scientist.
Marge: Its not BATMAN!

Rome

These super posts about "The Dark Knight" make me long for the ones we had about "300".

SD_Eagle5

Quote from: Rome on July 28, 2008, 07:30:46 PM
These super posts about "The Dark Knight" make me long for the ones we had about "300".

They're worse than Star Wars geeks. I haven't even seen the movie yet so every page I have to scroll through to make sure I don't read any spoilers. It's so bad they even got igy involved.

rjs246

Quote
he kidnaps only to draw out gordon and batman. not because he is going to become some super villain like in the comics.

That's my whole point. If that was the only reason for the last 15 minutes of the movie than is was a complete farging waste. Boring, extraneous dead weight.
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

Rome


rjs246

Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

Magical_Retard

Quote from: SD_Eagle on July 28, 2008, 08:00:51 PM
Quote from: Rome on July 28, 2008, 07:30:46 PM
These super posts about "The Dark Knight" make me long for the ones we had about "300".

They're worse than Star Wars geeks. I haven't even seen the movie yet so every page I have to scroll through to make sure I don't read any spoilers. It's so bad they even got igy involved.

my bad i thought everyone here had seen it.
Marge: I have someone who can help you!
Homer: Is it BATMAN!!??
Marge: No hes a scientist
Homer: Batman is a scientist.
Marge: Its not BATMAN!

Geowhizzer

Nothing is worse than Star Wars geeks.  Nothing.  Except Met fans.

Rome


Geowhizzer


PhillyPhreak54

I've seen some guys on Extremeskins who are Mets fans too.

A taterskin, Met and Star Wars geek?!?

oh the horror.

BigEd76

Quote from: Geowhizzer on July 28, 2008, 08:29:52 PM
Nothing is worse than Star Wars geeks.  Nothing.  Except Met fans.

Trekkies?

SD_Eagle5

Quote from: Geowhizzer on July 28, 2008, 08:29:52 PM
Nothing is worse than Star Wars geeks.  Nothing.  Except people arguing if Two face is dead and sucking Heath Ledger's rotted penis for 20 pages