ConcreteBoard

Football => The Rest of the NFL => Topic started by: Sgt PSN on January 09, 2010, 05:34:09 PM

Title: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 09, 2010, 05:34:09 PM
cincy and the jets tied up at 7 early in the 2nd. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 09, 2010, 05:52:23 PM
Jets up 14-7

Cincy with a few issues on offense already
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 09, 2010, 05:53:25 PM
dirty sanchez strikes again

marvin lewis took a page out of reid's playbook and has already wasted 2 timeouts (via unsuccessful challenges) and had no challenges left on that td that looked like it might have been oob before reaching the endzone.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: shorebird on January 09, 2010, 06:23:21 PM
Ocho Cincho is getting shut out. Palmer is having a McNabb/off day.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on January 09, 2010, 06:23:44 PM
Joe Gibbs is absolutely brutal as a commentator. Brutal.


NBC has done two segments on the Birds game, and have said nothing about the Eagles....I don't even think they've mentioned a player on the team. The did do a god awful interview with Romo.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on January 09, 2010, 06:42:01 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhanInDC on January 09, 2010, 06:23:44 PM
Joe Gibbs is absolutely brutal as a commentator. Brutal.

The combo of him and Theismann almost needs to be heard to be believed. Hammond is having an off day too. The funniest part is that they have zero excitement about the game. When Dustin Keller scored that 40-something yard TD, like 15 seconds later they casually mentioned it.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on January 09, 2010, 06:43:54 PM
Jets take points off the board by incurring two penalties in FG position, then Cincy marches downfield and Graham misses a 35-yarder.

The winner of this game is going to get smoked next week.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on January 09, 2010, 07:32:23 PM
Shayne Graham better work on his post-NFL resume
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 09, 2010, 11:12:06 PM
jets are the 2005 steelers...dont be surprised of they make the sb
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 10, 2010, 02:47:49 PM
Not with Sanchez they won't. He's horrible.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 10, 2010, 03:11:09 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 09, 2010, 11:12:06 PM
jets are the 2005 steelers...dont be surprised of they make the sb

I love watching them play. Love Rex Ryan and his attitude.

New England really came to play today. They look worse than the Eagles. And I didn't think that was possible.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 10, 2010, 03:50:56 PM
Guarantee the talk is the End of an Era with the Pats/Eagles.  Now the Cowboys will be the new fav's for the next 10 years.  FML
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Eagles_Legendz on January 10, 2010, 05:11:07 PM
Arizona got 0 respect again going into this game.  Put Warner in a dome in the playoffs and good luck stopping him.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 10, 2010, 06:34:38 PM
Never understood why everyone was in love with Green Bay going into these playoffs.  Other than Woodson, their defense is shot...
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: shorebird on January 10, 2010, 06:48:44 PM
Friggen' Ray Rice is something special. What a day he had rushing for 159 yds. The first play of the game he took to the house for 80 plus yds. Between McGahee and Rice it was all the Ravens needed. Who said you have to pass in todays NFL to win big games? The Ravens ran it down the Pats throats the whole game.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 10, 2010, 07:05:31 PM
He's having a hell of a year no doubt but I want to see how he holds up after being the guy for another full year.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on January 10, 2010, 07:05:51 PM
Packers making a move in the game?
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: MDS on January 10, 2010, 07:11:09 PM
can you imagine the pouting and the whining mcnabb would be doing if he was qbing this green bay squad? good lord what is it like to have an actual qb...

Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 10, 2010, 07:14:17 PM
People actually thought McNabb was better than Rodgers last week.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: MDS on January 10, 2010, 07:18:27 PM
by people you mean homers.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 10, 2010, 07:19:41 PM
Rodgers aint winnin no SB this year.

And that's with talented WR's, lack of a running game, and a defense that sucks minus one or two players.



Hmmmmmmmmmmm.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: MDS on January 10, 2010, 07:22:59 PM
are you watching this game doofus

the day donovan mcnabb leads a comeback like this is the day your fat cousin doesnt blow you under the trailer park
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 10, 2010, 07:25:33 PM
....Aaron Rodgers aint winnin no Super Bowl this year....
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: MDS on January 10, 2010, 07:28:05 PM
what does that have to do with anything

no hes not going to beat drew brees or peyton manning. thank you for informing everyone of that.

he didnt pout, whine, get his head down, complain, point fingers, goofily laugh when his team went down. he looked like a farging qb. which is more than i can say for 5.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 10, 2010, 07:38:29 PM
Oh really? McNabb didn't do any of that last year when Arizona built up a big lead in the first half.

McNabb ended up getting the team back into it in the 4th, only to have the defense give up a long TD drive to give Arizona the lead back. Hmmmmmm.....


Even if Rodgers does find a way to send this game to OT, he still won't win the SB. Because of the team around him that includes talented WR's, a lack of running game, and a defense that can sometimes leak like a sieve. Of course it must be mostly Rodgers fault though.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 10, 2010, 07:40:44 PM
brad johnson or trent dilfer will never win a superbowl either
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: MDS on January 10, 2010, 07:41:45 PM
he threw an essential hail mary to pimp with 11 minutes to go in the game, said to himself that he did enough, and that was it.

football doesnt work like that. and thats why you have donovan mcnabb...11 years, 0 superbowls.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 10, 2010, 07:42:11 PM
They will when they've got a stud defense.


Wow what a catch by Jennings there. Possibly the most underrated WR in the NFL right now.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 10, 2010, 07:44:16 PM
Two Cards just had an easy pick and they ran into each other :-D
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 10, 2010, 07:49:49 PM
Quote from: Munson on January 10, 2010, 07:38:29 PM
Oh really? McNabb didn't do any of that last year when Arizona built up a big lead in the first half.

McNabb ended up getting the team back into it in the 4th, only to have the defense give up a long TD drive to give Arizona the lead back. Hmmmmmm.....



oh just like Green Bay did, and what did Rogers do?  he led ANOTHER farging touchdown drive.  what did Donnie do?  throw 3 passes into the dirt and shtein his pants.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 10, 2010, 07:51:09 PM
Aaron Rodgers also threw up an easy pick that should have ended the game. Oh, Cardinals....

Like I said, even if this game gets to OT, Aaron Rodgers aint gonna win a SB this year no matter how good he plays. Because the team around him is balls.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 10, 2010, 07:51:37 PM
Quote from: SunMo on January 10, 2010, 07:49:49 PM
Quote from: Munson on January 10, 2010, 07:38:29 PM
Oh really? McNabb didn't do any of that last year when Arizona built up a big lead in the first half.

McNabb ended up getting the team back into it in the 4th, only to have the defense give up a long TD drive to give Arizona the lead back. Hmmmmmm.....



oh just like Green Bay did, and what did Rogers do?  he led ANOTHER farging touchdown drive.  what did Donnie do?  throw 3 passes into the dirt and shtein his pants.

lol...could munson be more exposed if he tried
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: MDS on January 10, 2010, 07:51:52 PM
no one cares

the point is rodgers is a better qb right now than mcnabb.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 10, 2010, 07:52:29 PM
Quote from: KDS on January 10, 2010, 07:51:52 PM
the point is rodgers is a better qb right now the mcnabb.

hes a better qb right now than mcnabb has EVER been
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 10, 2010, 07:53:19 PM
It's funny you say that IGY because if that ball gets picked and the Pack loses in regulation, you wouldn't bother saying a thing. Or at the very least you'd say it was anybody but Rodgers fault. Your hate for McNabb is it's own monster now, very much out of your control. It's a good time all around though.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 10, 2010, 07:53:44 PM
Time for Warner to show Eagles fans what a clutch game-winning drive is all about.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: MDS on January 10, 2010, 07:53:56 PM
pretty much

i dont see aaron rodgers humping plexiglass or saying "all we need to get his one score" with a whole quarter to play
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 10, 2010, 07:54:17 PM
warner is the best post season qb of all time...period
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 10, 2010, 07:54:20 PM
Cole he already showed us that last year when he made the Eagles D his bitch :-D
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 10, 2010, 07:56:05 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 10, 2010, 07:54:17 PM
warner is the best post season qb of all time...period

Brady or Montana but Warner is great.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 10, 2010, 07:57:27 PM
lol what a GAG
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 10, 2010, 07:57:35 PM
Wow....that's two chokes in the last 4 minutes for the Cards.


How the farg do you miss that Rackers?
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 10, 2010, 07:58:21 PM
toss winner wins
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: MDS on January 10, 2010, 07:58:23 PM
football gods shine upon deserving qbs

now if rodgers gets the ball watch him come through
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 10, 2010, 07:58:27 PM
Rackers has been awful since his one amazing season.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 10, 2010, 08:01:46 PM
Quote from: King Cole on January 10, 2010, 07:56:05 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 10, 2010, 07:54:17 PM
warner is the best post season qb of all time...period

Brady or Montana but Warner is great.

they have more titles but warner has been the better post season qb


Quote from: SunMo on January 10, 2010, 07:58:21 PM
toss winner wins

this game pretty much defines the old "last team with the ball wins" saying
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 10, 2010, 08:04:05 PM
Rodgers doing his best McNabb on that one...
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 10, 2010, 08:04:47 PM
Quote from: Munson on January 10, 2010, 07:19:41 PM
Rodgers aint winnin no SB this year.

And that's with talented WR's, lack of a running game, and a defense that sucks minus one or two players.



Hmmmmmmmmmmm.

lol you farging nitwit. 

ryan grant ran for over 1200 yards and was ranked 7th in the league.  their defense ranked #2 in total yds, #7 in pts against and T2 in takeaways. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 10, 2010, 08:05:58 PM
lol holy shtein
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 10, 2010, 08:07:10 PM
tuck rule?
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 10, 2010, 08:07:27 PM
arizonas defense had the ball last
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 10, 2010, 08:07:40 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on January 10, 2010, 08:04:47 PM
Quote from: Munson on January 10, 2010, 07:19:41 PM
Rodgers aint winnin no SB this year.

And that's with talented WR's, lack of a running game, and a defense that sucks minus one or two players.



Hmmmmmmmmmmm.

lol you farging nitwit. 

ryan grant ran for over 1200 yards and was ranked 7th in the league.  their defense ranked #2 in total yds, #7 in pts against and T2 in takeaways. 


Yes, stats tell the whole story.

Ryan Grant has been so hot and cold, and everyone knows their D has sucked only a little less than they did last year.



[McNabbHater]All the time in the world, he should have just thrown that ball away instead of taking the sack and the turnover and losing the game[/RodgersSupporter]
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: MDS on January 10, 2010, 08:08:08 PM
god awful luck there

fun game

how seething is fox that they wont get favre/cowboys at 430 sunday.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 10, 2010, 08:08:17 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on January 10, 2010, 08:07:10 PM
tuck rule?

Maybe I blinked or something but I don't think that ball ever hit the ground. It's either a fumble caught in the air or an INT.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: MDS on January 10, 2010, 08:09:26 PM
it hit off rodgers foot. bad, bad luck.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 10, 2010, 08:12:41 PM
i just need to know if it's an int or a fumble.  we did some crazy type of fantasy "pool" at work and i drew zona's defense.  a forced fumble is 2pts and recovery also 2pts + 6pt for the td = 10pts.  an int is also worth 2pts which would only give me 8 points. 

rule it a fumble!!
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 10, 2010, 08:25:39 PM
Early odds for next week:

Chargers -7.5 (O/U 42.5)
Saints -7 (O/U 56.0)
Colts -6.5 (O/U 45.0)
Vikings -2.5 (O/U 46.5)
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 10, 2010, 10:28:25 PM
That ARZ-GB game was farging great.

Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 11, 2010, 12:27:29 AM
it beat 1995 Eagles/Lions by 1 point for most in a playoff game
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: NC_Eagle on January 11, 2010, 08:44:23 AM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 10, 2010, 10:28:25 PM
That ARZ-GB game was farging great.

This x 1000. Ludicrous game.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Eagles_Legendz on January 11, 2010, 12:14:47 PM
I love watching Kurt Warner in the playoffs.  He fits the football through windows better than anyone I've seen come crunch time.  Should be fun watching them against the Saints next week.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 11, 2010, 12:20:04 PM
he had more td passes than incompletions yesterday

on 33 attempts

that is mind boggling
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: reese125 on January 11, 2010, 12:32:28 PM
cant see how either defense will hold in the saints vs cards game. the over/under should be set at 75
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 11, 2010, 12:57:15 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 11, 2010, 12:20:04 PM
he had more td passes than incompletions yesterday

on 33 attempts

that is mind boggling

i'm trying to figure out how he didn't have a perfect qb rating at the end of the game.  i've seen qb's with lesser comp % and td passes end up with a perfect score.  hell, warner himself had a perfect rating in 08 against the dolphins with less attempts, completions, lower comp %, fewer yards and fewer td's. 

of course, qb rating is a joke...and his qb rating from that game proves it.  warner was as perfect as can be yesterday and anyone with half a brain can figure that out on their own.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 11, 2010, 01:14:18 PM
as ludicrous as it sounds it appears to me that he didnt get a perfect rating because he had to many attempts
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: reese125 on January 11, 2010, 01:52:16 PM
the only one I can remember that came close to this is Manning who went 22-26-377, 5 TDs vs. Denver in the wild card came on 1/4/04--he had a 158.3 rating
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 11, 2010, 01:56:13 PM
manning also would have done it against the chiefs i think but he threw an int

dave kreig also did it in the playoffs...as did terry bradshaw...i think only five people ever have done it but i dont know the other two
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 11, 2010, 02:03:55 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 11, 2010, 01:14:18 PM
as ludicrous as it sounds it appears to me that he didnt get a perfect rating because he had to many attempts

that's what i was thinking too.  so i looked it up. 

35 different qb's have done it a total of 58 times and the overwhelming majority of them did it with 25 or less attempts in a game.   only 2 have gotten a perfect rating with 30 or more attempts.  warner (30 att) in 2000 against the chargers and ken o'brien (32 att) in 1986 against the seahawks. 

link (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NFL_quarterbacks_who_have_posted_a_perfect_passer_rating)

QuoteTo qualify, a QB must attempt at least 10 passes, a minimum of a 77.5% completion percentage, 11.875% touchdown passes percentage, 12.5 yards or more per attempt, and no interceptions.

the yds per attempt seems to be what kept him from getting the perfect rating because he "only" averaged 11.5 ypa.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 11, 2010, 02:55:28 PM
Quote from: Eagles_Legendz on January 11, 2010, 12:14:47 PM
I love watching Kurt Warner in the playoffs.  He fits the football through windows better than anyone I've seen come crunch time.  Should be fun watching them against the Saints next week.

Could not agree with you more.  I am finally starting to appreciate this guy.  Dude looks like shtein for 1 3/4 quarters last year in the NFCG and when it was time to seal the deal he takes over the game.  Almost pulled it off again in the Super Bowl.  The Cards better start praying (which Warner loves to do) now he comes back next year.  Whole different team with Lienert at the helm.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 11, 2010, 03:53:32 PM
Quote from: Don Ho on January 11, 2010, 02:55:28 PM
The Cards better start praying (which Warner loves to do) now he comes back next year.  Whole different team with Mcnabb at the helm.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 11, 2010, 04:57:31 PM
 :-D
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: reese125 on January 11, 2010, 07:12:08 PM
good luck on those slants Fitz
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 11, 2010, 10:25:55 PM
If ARZ beats NO, then MIN has to rape Dallas even more to keep them from hosting an NFCCG.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on January 11, 2010, 10:34:00 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 11, 2010, 10:25:55 PM
If ARZ beats NO, then MIN has to rape Dallas even more to keep them from hosting an NFCCG.

yeah that stadium is a more appropriate venue for a televangelist or walmart shareholder meeting than any kind of football championship. gotta keep that shtein out of there.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 11, 2010, 10:38:18 PM
I laid out that scenario to the jerkoff Cowboys fans around here today. Most of them cannot fathom how I would root against Dallas. Why? Because its the NFC East and I should represent them.

They clearly don't understand that I hold grudges, that my DNA as an Eagles fan would never allow me to root for that team and because I flat out hate them.

If Wade Phillips and Tony Romo win a SB before Reid and McNabb I will kill myself or move to Iceland and start a goat farm.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: MDS on January 11, 2010, 10:45:24 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 11, 2010, 10:38:18 PM
I laid out that scenario to the jerkoff Cowboys fans around here today. Most of them cannot fathom how I would root against Dallas. Why? Because its the NFC East and I should represent them.

They clearly don't understand that I hold grudges, that my DNA as an Eagles fan would never allow me to root for that team and because I flat out hate them.

If Wade Phillips and Tony Romo win a SB before Reid and McNabb I will kill myself or move to Iceland and start a goat farm.


oh sweet jesus your delusion is worse than i thought. you cannot be saved.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Tomahawk on January 12, 2010, 12:40:37 AM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 11, 2010, 10:38:18 PM
I laid out that scenario to the jerkoff Cowboys fans around here today. Most of them cannot fathom how I would root against Dallas. Why? Because its the NFC East and I should represent them.

They clearly don't understand that I hold grudges, that my DNA as an Eagles fan would never allow me to root for that team and because I flat out hate them.

If Wade Phillips and Tony Romo win a SB before Reid and McNabb I will kill myself or move to Iceland and start a goat farm.

Unless you really really really want to swallow a bullet or farg goats, you should probably avoid statements like that
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Eagaholic on January 12, 2010, 02:30:12 AM
Romo and Wade will probably be around longer than Reid and 5. dallas already has their one playoff win for the decade to coast on.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Rome on January 12, 2010, 01:15:13 PM
Quote from: Tomahawk on January 12, 2010, 12:40:37 AM
Unless you really really really want to swallow a bullet or farg goats, you should probably avoid statements like that

It worked out pretty well for Yeti.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 12, 2010, 03:37:00 PM
lololol....rex ryan is the best


"A number I think is interesting would be eight, and, no, that's not the amount of touchdown passes that Green Bay gave up against Arizona. That is the number of touchdown passes we gave up all season as the Jets, and the biggest reason for that is Darrelle Revis."
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 12, 2010, 09:16:02 PM
Awesome.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Eagaholic on January 12, 2010, 09:28:01 PM
where does Rex get that from?

Btw, Buddy never would have let this team lose to dallas like they did this year
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 12, 2010, 09:35:19 PM
Quote from: Eagaholic on January 12, 2010, 09:28:01 PM
Btw, Buddy never would have let this team lose to dallas like they did this year

regular season games are debatable.  post season is another story though as buddy won exactly 0 playoff games.  great personality.  great defensive mind.  probably below average as a head coach though.   but it's impossible not to love the guy anyway.   
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 12, 2010, 09:41:24 PM
regular season really wasnt debatable....buddy lost exactly one non strike game to dallas and that was the first time he ever played them and most times he humiliated them....thats basically what he lived for...to beat dallas

buddy = GOAT
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 12, 2010, 09:43:31 PM
i say debatable because dallas was a superior team this year and the eagles defense sucks balls.  not sure if even buddy would have made a difference. 

but yes, buddy's record vs dallas was damn near perfect and to top it all of, he had a genuine hatred for them just as the fans do.  reid doesn't hate anything.  except diets, timeouts and running the ball. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 12, 2010, 09:46:36 PM
i cant see buddy ever losing to dallas in any year but then rex ryan might be my son
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Eagaholic on January 12, 2010, 09:47:25 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 12, 2010, 09:41:24 PM
regular season really wasnt debatable....buddy lost exactly one non strike game to dallas and that was the first time he ever played them and most times he humiliated them....thats basically what he lived for...to beat dallas

buddy = GOAT

Yes, Buddy hated dallas as much as any of the players. I wish I could remember who Buddy told this to, but after he lost that game to dallas he said he would never let that happen again, and he didn't. You bring up a good point Sarge about him losing in the playoffs, but I have to believe if there's a team they would beat, it would have been the cowboys. bounty or not.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: MDS on January 12, 2010, 09:50:52 PM
buddy was basically mcnabb except 10000x cooler

rich kotite = kevin kolb
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 12, 2010, 09:58:19 PM
Go Jets.

Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 12, 2010, 10:06:42 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 12, 2010, 09:58:19 PM
Go Jets.

i was trying to think of which team i'd be "rooting" for now that the eagles are out.  the packers were my fall back since my g/f is a packers fan and i really like their team as a whole.....lots of good players who are fun to watch.  but obviously they are out too.   

they're probably the least favored team left in the playoffs now so i like the under dog route. 

i like the colts but i've already seen peyton manning with a super bowl so i'm good for now. 

the ravens are ok.  wouldn't mind seeing harbaugh do well so i can keep being happy for him.  and flacco is a local guy.

the vikings have the worst fight song ever and favre is the ultimate drama queen, attention whore farg face. 

i like the saints but would hate to see that perennial joke of a franchise win one before the eagles. 

same goes for the cards.  yeah, i want to see 2 teams fail based on their fan bases.  lame, but i'm sticking with it. 

rivers is a whiney douche and norv turner's neck meat creeps me out. 

farg dallas. 

rex ryan, son of buddy, leaver of corny voicemails to season ticket holders gives the edge to the jets.  whatever. 

of course, it'll end up being dallas vs chargers, thus guaranteeing that either wade phillips or norv turner will win a super bowl. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 13, 2010, 08:33:08 AM
Once the Eagles lost I was rooting hard for the Packers for the simple reason that I wanted Rodgers to advance further than farging Favre and humiliate that old man. That didn't exactly pan out.

So now I'm deciding between the Jets because of Ryan and San Diego because I couldn't possibly care less about San Diego. I think I'll focus on getting drunk and gambling until I make up my mind.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Diomedes on January 13, 2010, 08:42:19 AM
I'd like Baltimore to do well so I don't have to listen to the guys at work crying and bitching.

That's how much I care about the rest of this NFL season.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 13, 2010, 08:47:35 AM
I take the opposite stance. When I'm surrounded by another team's fans I want them all to be in misery.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Diomedes on January 13, 2010, 08:49:38 AM
I understand.

The hue and cry over poor Ravens performance grates my nerves more than the pompous self congratulations they exchange following a win.

Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 13, 2010, 10:04:25 AM
i hope every team crashes and burns

the only team left that i dont fully despise is the colts who i simply just hate
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 13, 2010, 12:38:53 PM
what is there to hate about the colts exactly?  other than the fact that the few times they've played the eagles over the last 10 years, the games have been absolute blow outs? 

Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: General_Failure on January 13, 2010, 12:43:23 PM
I couldn't stand watching their games in the old dome with the horrible lighting they had, so lets go with that. Farg the Colts and the horrible office lighting they used to have!
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 13, 2010, 12:46:13 PM
i heard they still use windows nt in their administration offices too. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 13, 2010, 01:47:52 PM
More importantly, what's there to like about the Colts, exactly?
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 13, 2010, 05:29:20 PM
Hank Baskett and Raheem brock?
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 13, 2010, 05:35:35 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 13, 2010, 01:47:52 PM
More importantly, what's there to like about the Colts, exactly?

The Big Great aka Peyton Manning.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 13, 2010, 06:03:34 PM
lol @ phreak going with the 2 former eagles. 

unless you simply don't like peyton manning, i can't see any reason why any fan outside of the afc south wouldn't like that team.  it's not like they have a roster full of criminals or jackasses. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on January 13, 2010, 07:17:22 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on January 13, 2010, 06:03:34 PM
unless you simply don't like peyton manning, i can't see any reason why any fan outside of the afc south wouldn't like that team.  it's not like they have a roster full of criminals or jackasses. 

now that they got rid of that murderer marvin harrison
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 13, 2010, 08:07:26 PM
allegedly

Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: General_Failure on January 13, 2010, 09:25:24 PM
No, I'm pretty sure he's not on the team now.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 14, 2010, 10:19:30 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on January 13, 2010, 12:38:53 PM
what is there to hate about the colts exactly? 

they beat the eagles by 50 everytime they play?
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 14, 2010, 10:26:57 AM
read the rest of the post dook.

Quote from: Sgt PSN on January 13, 2010, 12:38:53 PM
what is there to hate about the colts exactly? other than the fact that the few times they've played the eagles over the last 10 years, the games have been absolute blow outs? 


Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 14, 2010, 10:32:28 AM
were you talking to yourself there or did you question why people would hate the colts then give a damn good reason for it
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 14, 2010, 10:45:02 AM
I find that I hate superstars in general and Peyton Manning is a superstar. So while I support his self-depreciating humor and appreciate the fact that someone so catastrophically out of shape can be a historically good NFL QB, I don't actually wish him any success come playoff time.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 14, 2010, 10:48:01 AM
i generally feel the same way about great players but theres certain players that are so great i come to respect and/or like them

manning is one of them for me
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 14, 2010, 10:49:37 AM
I don't really mind him and tend to like him more than other superstars, but in the playoffs my hatred of elite players gets magnified. I can't think of a good reason for that to happen, but whatever.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Tomahawk on January 14, 2010, 02:06:23 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 14, 2010, 10:45:02 AM
I find that I hate superstars in general and Peyton Manning is a superstar. So while I support his self-depreciating humor and appreciate the fact that someone so catastrophically out of shape can be a historically good NFL QB, I don't actually wish him any success come playoff time.

The fat fargs on the Biggest Loser are catastrophically out of shape; Peyton Manning is not
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 14, 2010, 02:20:10 PM
For an NFL quarterback he is the doughiest motherfarger I've ever seen. I have more muscle tone than that guy, which is a very sad state of affairs.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: reese125 on January 14, 2010, 02:29:21 PM
stop it
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 14, 2010, 02:37:06 PM
Catastrophic.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 14, 2010, 06:37:32 PM
manning isn't mcnabb fat.  but he looks like he'd let out a slight giggle if you poked his belly. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on January 14, 2010, 08:15:43 PM
I used to absolutely hate Manning and his peanut shaped head.  Though he is so good I have definitely gave an appreciation for him. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on January 14, 2010, 08:30:49 PM
Is Peyton is peanut-headed, what does that make Eli's head? A crushed peanut?
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 14, 2010, 10:15:26 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 14, 2010, 10:49:37 AM
I don't really mind him and tend to like him more than other superstars, but in the playoffs my hatred of elite players gets magnified. I can't think of a good reason for that to happen, but whatever.

Probably the constant slurp fest the get from the talking heads on ESPN, the pregame shows, and the in-game commentators.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 14, 2010, 10:17:17 PM
yeah, he should totally stop being so good so that people stop talking about him.  and you should definitely hate on him because other people can't stop talking about him.  it's the same with favre.  i'm not annoyed with favre because madden wouldn't stop talking about him.  i was annoyed with madden because he wouldnt stfu about him. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 14, 2010, 11:36:56 PM
Right, put the hate where it belongs. I've never hated Favre. His retirement antics annoy me, but I would much rather have had him QBing this team than McNabb.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: General_Failure on January 15, 2010, 12:25:17 AM
Either way, your season ends with an interception.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 15, 2010, 02:39:29 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4829103

saints have re-signed deuce mcallister and added him to their playoff roster.  i didn't realize you could still do that once the playoffs started. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on January 16, 2010, 01:55:21 AM
Ever hear of Jeff Thomason?
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 16, 2010, 02:39:36 AM
nope.  definitely not.  never ever ever heard of jeff thomason.  who the hell is that guy? 

i assume you threw his name out there because the eagles added him to their roster after the playoffs started.  i don't remember that but i do remember him. 

whatever. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Rome on January 16, 2010, 08:35:53 AM
i'm rooting for torn tendons and broken bones from here on out.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Tomahawk on January 16, 2010, 12:31:32 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on January 16, 2010, 02:39:36 AM
nope.  definitely not.  never ever ever heard of jeff thomason.  who the hell is that guy? 

i assume you threw his name out there because the eagles added him to their roster after the playoffs started.  i don't remember that but i do remember him. 

whatever. 

Remember Chad Lewis?
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 16, 2010, 04:42:19 PM
Tim Hightower on the first play of the game for a long ass TD.


I hope everyone bet the over.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Rome on January 16, 2010, 04:42:47 PM
Someone should tell Andy Reid that Arizona just ran the ball on the first down of the game and scored a touchdown.

Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 16, 2010, 04:43:27 PM
You mean a pro bowl accurate QB, pro bowl WR's...and they still run? :o
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Rome on January 16, 2010, 04:44:34 PM
Shocking, I know.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 16, 2010, 05:20:52 PM
3 straight TDs for New Orleans including a sick Bush run
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Tomahawk on January 16, 2010, 05:34:21 PM
It's gotta be a close race between the Eagles and Cards on which team sucks more at tackling
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 16, 2010, 05:34:55 PM
Quote from: Rome on January 16, 2010, 04:42:47 PM
Someone should tell Andy Reid that Arizona just ran the ball on the first down of the game and scored a touchdown.



When we run the ball it gets stuffed for 0 gain. The Eagles need interior help. It was actually balanced early in the game.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 16, 2010, 05:38:05 PM
Maybe Warner will blame their "youth".  Or God.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Rome on January 16, 2010, 05:40:41 PM
Actually having an offensive system that includes the run as a viable option might be helpful too.

And is anyone else sick of both of these teams already?  Jesus Christ... I've never seen more preening, boastful, showboating in my life.  Every farging time a play is made someone is up pointing, talking trash, or otherwise begging for someone to pay attention to them.   

Whatever happened to guys who made a play then returned to the huddle without making an ass of themselves?

It's just nauseating.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 16, 2010, 05:53:49 PM
I am really sick of seeing the Drew Brees pre game cheer.  Give me a break.  It's one thing when college guys/high school players do it but watching Brees do it is lame.  Please tell me FOX didn't show again this week.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 16, 2010, 05:54:23 PM
This is now over.  Can't see Leinert leading a comeback in these conditions.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Rome on January 16, 2010, 06:17:29 PM
holy shtein warner got jacked the farg up.

:-D
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 16, 2010, 07:24:46 PM
Is Reggie Bush in a contract year or something? Jesus christ he looks like a farging hall of famer out there today.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: General_Failure on January 16, 2010, 09:48:34 PM
Quote from: King Cole on January 16, 2010, 05:34:55 PM
Quote from: Rome on January 16, 2010, 04:42:47 PM
Someone should tell Andy Reid that Arizona just ran the ball on the first down of the game and scored a touchdown.



When we run the ball it gets stuffed for 0 gain. The Eagles need interior help. It was actually balanced early in the game.

You're not trying hard enough. Early in the game was six plays.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 16, 2010, 10:42:54 PM
Up until the halfway point of the 2nd q it was like 9 passes 7 runs or something.

I agree they should run more, I'm just saying it wasn't very effective.

Anyway, The Big Great out there making perfect throw after perfect throw. I'm so jealous of this QB.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on January 17, 2010, 10:41:40 AM
The Ravens loss means that Giants Stadium has officially seen its last NFL game.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 17, 2010, 12:25:45 PM
ed reed says that he's 50/50 on retiring.  dude can't be serious.  he's only 31. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on January 17, 2010, 12:42:56 PM
Westbrook is only 30. Injuries are a bitch.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 17, 2010, 12:52:12 PM
can't really compare a safety to a runningback.  especially a little guy like westbrook who has had some sort of injury every year he's been in the league that makes him miss at least a game or 2. 

i know reed's had a couple of injuries but dude is a bonafide freak. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: General_Failure on January 17, 2010, 01:38:53 PM
He might just want to enjoy walking when he's 50.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: shorebird on January 17, 2010, 01:48:15 PM
It's right after a tough, tough loss and he's probably bummed out about having two int's blown, one by a fumble and another by a penalty.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: reese125 on January 17, 2010, 04:33:47 PM
There hasn't been a home sweep in divisional games since 2004--do you lay money on the Jets? Cant do it.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: shorebird on January 17, 2010, 07:00:43 PM
Ha! Romo sucked today against a real team, with a real defense and a offense that can run the ball and a line that can block. It goes to show you that a team with a defense that can get to Romo, get him out of that comfort zone, and make him have to hurry, then you see the same ole' playoff qb that you've seen in years past. When pressured, he turns the ball over, either by a int, or fumble. He just plain can't hold the ball when he gets hit. He threw his int late in the 3rd quarter straight at Leber when the Cowboys were deep in thier own territory. You could see he was done just by the look on his face.

The way that Dallas beat the Eagles will all but be forgotten after seeing his lack of poise today when he had to actually do something other than drop back with no one near him and hit wide open recievers. Farve, on the other hand, when hit, got back up and stepped up, passing for 4 td's, while Romo folded like a wet dish rag.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: shorebird on January 17, 2010, 07:11:07 PM
Quote from: shorebird on January 10, 2010, 07:31:12 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 10, 2010, 07:21:42 PM
keep being a pathetic homer and not give a dallas guy credit...the man is on farging fire right now and really has been all year...there was no pass rush or linebackers on the planet that could have stopped him yesterday

How does me saying the Ealges D sucked make me a homer? Get off that crap. The only difference in the Cowboys team the Eagles lost to this year and the one they beat last year is no TO. I'm not saying that he's not playing good, but let's wait to see what happens when a good defense gets some pressure on him before we talk about how great he is. He's won one friggen' playoff game for christ sakes. Get off his cock.

...and it will remain one playoff game.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 17, 2010, 07:19:09 PM
cmon Chargers....again with the choking?
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 17, 2010, 08:03:49 PM
wow the Jets win it

Saints open as a 4.5-pt favorite
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 17, 2010, 08:09:22 PM
hahahahahaha farg phillip rivers in his whiney funhole. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 17, 2010, 08:27:05 PM
Go Jets!!

Keep on kickin ass, Rex Ryan.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 17, 2010, 08:40:30 PM
Colts open at 7.5 and will probably jump to 9
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 17, 2010, 09:10:47 PM
Phillip Rivers...more clutch than Donovan McNabb.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 17, 2010, 09:14:01 PM
Quote from: Munson on January 17, 2010, 09:10:47 PM
Phillip Rivers...more clutch than Donovan McNabb.

true as that may be, he's still a whiney biatch.  and today, i laugh at him. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: phillymic2000 on January 17, 2010, 09:32:31 PM
Quote from: Munson on January 17, 2010, 09:10:47 PM
Phillip Rivers...more clutch than Donovan McNabb.

:-D thats sum bullshtein there!! Rivers has taken the chargers how far in the playoffs?
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: MDS on January 17, 2010, 11:15:13 PM
rivers is basically mcnabb, yea.

though i will submit that its possible things could change if hes not around a choking dog coach like norv turner and around pouty "here we go again" losers like tomlinson. at least he doesnt strum the air guitar.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 17, 2010, 11:28:11 PM
Rivers isn't a choke artist. This is the first season where they underachieved. The previous few seasons they overachieved. He played playoff games with a torn ACL a couple years ago. He's an excellent QB. Kaeding cost them.

I hope everyone saw how mediocre Cromartie is though. He plays like such a bitch.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: MDS on January 17, 2010, 11:34:09 PM
hes mcnabb circa 2004 with slightly less success in the playoffs. like mcnabb won a game here or there THEN set up for the choke.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: NC_Eagle on January 17, 2010, 11:57:17 PM
Where are all the Dallas fair-weather hungry hungry hippos now? That game was great justice!  :-D

Unfortunately it also showed just how far the Eagles really have to go to be a true contender.  :boom
(Dallas obliterated the Eagles, then got obliterated by Minnesota)


Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 18, 2010, 02:25:34 AM
Quote from: KDS on January 17, 2010, 11:15:13 PM
rivers is basically mcnabb, yea.

though i will submit that its possible things could change if hes not around a choking dog coach like norv turner and around pouty "here we go again" losers like tomlinson. at least he doesnt strum the air guitar.

lol at making the same excuses for him that you try to blame McNabb for.


McNabb could have (not sure at this point) won a SB with a better coach and surrounding talent too. Imagine that.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: MDS on January 18, 2010, 02:39:41 AM
good lord

hes had loads of talent. and while andy is a bad coach he is not on the level of historic choking that norv turner is.

and i called rivers the new mcnabb. he has a chance to maybe break out of that only because the status quo has changed so much on that team. rivers hasnt been there for all the shortcomings.

plus rivers isnt the pouty loser that mcnabb is. that job goes to tomlinson. the shot of him on the bench after the jets went up 17-7 told you all you needed to know. weve seen that same exact "what else can go wrong/the world has it for me" look on the donovans face numerous times.

sometimes you need to change things because its just not going to work no matter how you shake it. such is the case the chargers and such is the case with the eagles.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 18, 2010, 03:53:45 AM
so andy's 1-4 in NFC championship games and he's not a historical choker....McNabb is 1-4 in NFC championship games and he is a historical choker.



Got it.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 18, 2010, 09:38:31 AM
i didn't realize that it was Rivers' fault that 9 points were left on the field in missed field goals, gotcha
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: MDS on January 18, 2010, 10:43:44 AM
why even attempt to talk to munson

not only is he an extremely stupid human being, but a giant glass completely full homer. sickening in fact. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: reese125 on January 18, 2010, 10:44:59 AM
Quote from: KDS on January 18, 2010, 02:39:41 AM
good lord

hes had loads of talent. and while andy is a bad coach he is not on the level of historic choking that norv turner is.

and i called rivers the new mcnabb. he has a chance to maybe break out of that only because the status quo has changed so much on that team. rivers hasnt been there for all the shortcomings.

plus rivers isnt the pouty loser that mcnabb is. that job goes to tomlinson. the shot of him on the bench after the jets went up 17-7 told you all you needed to know. weve seen that same exact "what else can go wrong/the world has it for me" look on the donovans face numerous times.

sometimes you need to change things because its just not going to work no matter how you shake it. such is the case the chargers and such is the case with the eagles.

I really get angry watching you try to be football savvy. please stick to tv ratings son
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Tomahawk on January 18, 2010, 12:50:17 PM
Quote from: SunMo on January 18, 2010, 09:38:31 AM
i didn't realize that it was Rivers' fault that 9 points were left on the field in missed field goals, gotcha

It was his fault they had to settle for field goal attempts instead of TDs?
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: MDS on January 18, 2010, 01:14:22 PM
some people just arent good enough. im one of those people. so is rivers. and so is mcnabb. we all know one when we see one.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 18, 2010, 02:03:27 PM
It's just funny watching you dolts throw out some of the same excuses for him that you swear are McNabb's fault on this team.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: methdeez on January 18, 2010, 02:36:13 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on January 17, 2010, 08:40:30 PM
Colts open at 7.5 and will probably jump to 9
I am thinking over betting on this Colts game.
In the Chargers game SD was playing against themselves as well as the Jets and unsurprisingly lost.  Also, the Bengals are a mediocre team who had an unlucky day.
IMHO the Ravens are the same team as the Jets, except better in almost all aspects: Both teams have a great defensive with a good running game and not-so-good QB'ing.
However, the Ravens defense is better, their running game is arguably better, and their QB is definitely better, and they got murdered by the Colts.
Therefore I think that the Colts will destroy the Jets.
The only counter argument is that Peyton played out of his mind this weekend and the Colts got a bunch of luck.
If those two reverse, I guess the Jets could win, but honestly I just can't see it.
They are by far the worst team in the Playoffs right now.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 18, 2010, 02:37:54 PM
i wouldn't say the ravens defense is better
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 18, 2010, 02:55:16 PM
Yeah the Ravens D is overrated anymore...still good, but not what they were for most of the 00's.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Tomahawk on January 18, 2010, 03:15:31 PM
Quote from: SunMo on January 18, 2010, 02:37:54 PM
i wouldn't say the ravens defense is better

I wouldn't call their run game better either
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Tomahawk on January 22, 2010, 05:56:25 PM
Prince's new "fight" song for the Vikings is hilariously bad
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: reese125 on January 23, 2010, 08:20:37 PM
I got a feeling that the Jets are going to pull this out in a real close game. I think Revis plays on Dallas Clark a lot this game--which could very well affect the 3rd down opps, and Wayne consistently gets over the top help from the Jets safety. That could leave the middle of the field open for Collie and Garcon, but can they come up consistently against that d. Tack on a very mediocre Colts running game and this is a good match up.

There was a stat I posted a couple of weeks that of the top 4 scoring defenses in the league, one has made the SB since 02. This year it was the Pats, Ravens, Cowboys and the Jets...and to top it off the last time both No. 1 seeds reached Super Bowl the same season was 1993 (this is of course saying if the saints win).

take your money out boys.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 24, 2010, 12:31:00 PM
Quote from: Tomahawk on January 22, 2010, 05:56:25 PM
Prince's new "fight" song for the Vikings is hilariously bad

i just heard it for the first time last night and found 2 things i previously didn't think were possible.

1.  that price was capable of composing such an awful pile of crap. 

2.  that anyone was capable of creating something that out-sucks the actual vikings fight song. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Tomahawk on January 24, 2010, 01:25:43 PM
Can't directly link to the audio, but if you hate your eardrums you can listen to the full song here:

http://www.myfoxtwincities.com/dpp/sports/prince-reveals-song-for-vikings-saints-game (http://www.myfoxtwincities.com/dpp/sports/prince-reveals-song-for-vikings-saints-game)

Purple and Gold Lyrics

the veil of the sky draws open
the roar of the chariots touch down
we r the ones who have now come again
and walk upon water like solid ground
as we approach the throne we won't bow down
this time we won't b denied

raise every voice and let it b known
in the name of the purple and gold

we come in the name of the purple and gold
all of the odds r in r favor
no prediction 2 bold
we r the truth if the truth can b told
long reign the purple and gold

the eyes say ready 4 battle
no need 4 sword in hand
we r all amped up like a rock n roll band
ready 2 celebrate every score
ready 2 fight the elegant war
ready 2 hear the crowd roar

that's what we came 4
and so much more
in the name of the purple and gold

r spirits may b tired
r bodies may b worn
but since this day is r destiny
r history – that's y we must b
4ever strong as the wind that blows the Vikings' horn
in the name of the purple and gold
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 24, 2010, 01:59:50 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 09, 2010, 11:12:06 PM
jets are the 2005 steelers...dont be surprised of they make the sb
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 24, 2010, 03:57:19 PM
dirty sanchez just threw the longest td pass in jets playoff history. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 24, 2010, 04:13:30 PM
the jets game plan is always perfect but the play calling today has just been spectacular
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 24, 2010, 04:15:18 PM
that qb sneak call by the colts on the other hand, was terrible.  the way to beat an athletic defense like the jets is with athletes on offensive, not peyton manning.   
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 24, 2010, 04:18:28 PM
what a great throw by sanchez with brock all up in his grill. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Tomahawk on January 24, 2010, 04:24:34 PM
No doubt Sarge. I thought if the Jets were to win it would be with the run game and defense; not Durty Sanchez's arm
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 24, 2010, 04:31:03 PM
not that sanchez hasnt been good but they have won it with the run and defense...sanchez has only thrown it like seven times...the bomb was great play action set up by running the ball all first quarter
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Tomahawk on January 24, 2010, 04:35:47 PM
He made a heckuva play by getting rid of it instead of taking the sack and his 2nd TD pass was nice. I'm just impressed with how he's been playing.

Leaving Collie wide open in the end zone isn't very good D
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 24, 2010, 04:47:49 PM
yeah he is definitely impressive for a rookie
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Tomahawk on January 24, 2010, 04:56:01 PM
Greene has been impressive for the past few weeks too
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on January 24, 2010, 05:03:07 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 24, 2010, 04:31:03 PM
not that sanchez hasnt been good but they have won it with the run and defense...sanchez has only thrown it like seven times...the bomb was great play action set up by running the ball all first quarter

Wow. Running the ball to set up play action.

What a concept.  :-X
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 24, 2010, 05:34:55 PM
Come on Jets.

I love Rex Ryan...his brash attitude, love of defense and running the ball and shtein talking is great.

I hope they can pull this out.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Tomahawk on January 24, 2010, 05:38:25 PM
Too bad Reggie Wayne was able to recover his own fumble
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 24, 2010, 05:39:15 PM
I'm the opposite. Rooting for the Colts and hate Rex Ryan. I hate all Ryans.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Tomahawk on January 24, 2010, 05:41:11 PM
I miss the inadvertent facemask
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 24, 2010, 05:45:25 PM
peyton in a zone right now...good god is he good...another sb and imo he becomes the best qb of all time
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 24, 2010, 05:50:10 PM
The Big Great is just going out there and doing what he wants to do. Being great.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 24, 2010, 05:54:12 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 24, 2010, 05:45:25 PM
peyton in a zone right now...good god is he good...another sb and imo he becomes the best qb of all time

had a feeling that he was going to go off in the 2nd half.  he found his rhythm at the end of the 1st half when they scored.  at that point, it was simply a matter on whether or not the jets would be able to match the colts score for score, which they aren't built to do. 

good run for the jets though.  if sanchez turns into even a half decent nfl qb, that team could be pretty sick.   
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 24, 2010, 07:07:21 PM
wow is the saints PA guy annoying
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Tomahawk on January 24, 2010, 07:26:24 PM
I hope neither defense steps up. This is a fun game to watch
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 24, 2010, 09:22:50 PM
lol at Peterson fumbling three times, and the Vikes five times all together.

Favre got smoked a few times. Hurts his ankle and he plays up the theatrics.

And Joe Buck's nose could not be further up Brett's ass..."and the legend continues to grow" he says when favre stepped under center again after having his ankle re-taped.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 24, 2010, 09:49:16 PM
2 minutes for Favre to lead a championship game-winning drive
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on January 24, 2010, 09:55:11 PM
Sometimes it's really, really hard to believe that the NFL is not, at times, scripted.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 24, 2010, 09:59:22 PM
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: General_Failure on January 24, 2010, 09:59:39 PM
Gunslinger!
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on January 24, 2010, 09:59:52 PM
From now until the end of eternity, he shall be known as Brad "12 Men" Childress.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on January 24, 2010, 10:00:15 PM
FINALLY. I've been waiting all season for Brett Farve to be the old pick machine I knew he was. It was worth the wait.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: General_Failure on January 24, 2010, 10:17:52 PM
I think those last two plays took about ten minutes of real time.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 24, 2010, 10:29:55 PM
woooo

first time since 1993-94 that both #1 seeds reach the Super Bowl
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: MDS on January 24, 2010, 10:39:01 PM
lol favre

mcnabb for a minny's 1

IN
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 24, 2010, 10:42:31 PM
Colts open as a 4-pt favorite, O/U 56.0
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Eagles_Legendz on January 24, 2010, 11:10:36 PM
Favre royally farged up there but that is as much on Childress.  He completely backed off with a minute to go and put their offense in position to have to make that play at the end..  With the way kickers have been in the playoffs was he really going to rely on a 50 yard field goal when he had a minute to move the ball 10 more yards?
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Rome on January 24, 2010, 11:30:08 PM
The last series the Vikings ran might as well have been conceived and executed by Andy Reid.

Just astoundingly awful in every respect.

Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: MDS on January 24, 2010, 11:39:51 PM
andy reid sans mcnabb

no shot mcnabb gets them into fg position in that spot. no shot he throws the interception either, too afraid. favre circa 1996 hits that pass. its just that favre instinctively cant help but play like its 1996. which is why no one was surprised when the other shoe dropped.

also how smoking hot is his wife? good god.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 24, 2010, 11:42:54 PM
lol the excuses you make for other QB's in attempts to blame McNabb for everything are so incredible I can only hope it's attempts at fishing for Phreak or PG to come at you.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: MDS on January 24, 2010, 11:46:32 PM
what excuse did i make for favre

he farged up and lost the game for them, combined with andy reid jr's play calling. no way to shine that up.

but when i was watching it i wondered if mcnabb was in this spot, what would he do. and the answer is unequivocally he would go 3 and out and blame the defense for giving up 28 points.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 24, 2010, 11:47:57 PM
I think it just proves that when there's an idiot calling plays expecting his QB to be super man....it aint gonna work.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: phillymic2000 on January 25, 2010, 12:18:41 AM
 :-D Favre throws a HORRIBLE pick to end it and joe buck is probably still cryin ;D
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Eagaholic on January 25, 2010, 01:42:02 AM
Farve happens
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 25, 2010, 07:22:34 AM
Quote from: Rome on January 24, 2010, 11:30:08 PM
The last series the Vikings ran might as well have been conceived and executed by Andy Reid.

Just astoundingly awful in every respect.



it really was amazing....i had incredible de ja vu of the superbowl as it was happening except i was dumbfounded instead of being enraged
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on January 25, 2010, 09:38:48 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 25, 2010, 07:22:34 AM
Quote from: Rome on January 24, 2010, 11:30:08 PM
The last series the Vikings ran might as well have been conceived and executed by Andy Reid.

Just astoundingly awful in every respect.



it really was amazing....i had incredible de ja vu of the superbowl as it was happening except i was dumbfounded instead of being enraged

Ditto. But I was laughing...and very hard...at the pick. I wanted it to happen so badly. When he threw the first one, I was like, "aw, save it for later." Didn't matter. I love it.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 25, 2010, 09:59:33 AM
was thinking about this last night......does 1 super bowl win really make a difference?  during his 19 year career, favre has appeared in 4 nfccg and won 2 along with 1 super bowl.  he also virtually sealed his team's fate in his last 2 appearances by throwing an int.  during his career, he's had 30 4th qtr comebacks and 43 gw drives. 

in a little more than half that time, mcnabb's been to 5 nfccg, 1 super bowl and has 15 4th qtr comebacks and 23 gw drives. 

this isn't so much an attempt to say that mcnabb is great, but more to ask the question how great is favre?  obviously there are some intangibles that separate the 2, but if you compare them the only real difference is the 1 super bowl.  obviously it should carry some weight to it, but how much exactly?  in other words, is favre really one of the top 3-5 qb's of all time like we've sort of been programmed to believe over the years, or is he just a ridiculous stat machine that doesn't have a lot of substance to back it up? 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 25, 2010, 10:01:34 AM
He won a championship and holds every iron-man and statistical record there is. He's a great QB. He's also an unqualified douche.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 25, 2010, 10:01:37 AM
69,000 yards and almost 500 td is insane, that's not just some good stats
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 25, 2010, 10:04:42 AM
that's my point.  his reg season accomplishments are off the charts awesome.  and given how insane those numbers are, aren't his post season accomplishments somewhat lacking in comparison?  and since qb's are mostly judged on the post season, does favre's playoff short comings knock him down a peg or 2 in the nfl qb hierarchy?
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 25, 2010, 10:07:14 AM
No. He won a championship. Unlike Fouts and Marino. He's a top 3-5 QB without question.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Zanshin on January 25, 2010, 10:15:39 AM
You live by the Brett, you die by the Brett.

It wasn't all him all game, though. Some of the turnovers in that game were flat-out ridiculous.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: General_Failure on January 25, 2010, 10:17:19 AM
I barely paid attention to the game, but every time I looked the refs were digging through the pile to see who recovered a fumble.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: phillymic2000 on January 25, 2010, 10:18:50 AM
He played a bunch of years doped up, farg all the iron man awards. He's not top 5, top 10 yes. He is a top three all time dickhead.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 25, 2010, 10:27:53 AM
9 different NFC teams in the Super Bowl the last 9 years

the taterskins, Lions and Vikings are the only teams that haven't been there since 1994

and the Vikings have lost their last 5 championship games
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 25, 2010, 11:06:37 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 25, 2010, 10:07:14 AM
No. He won a championship. Unlike Fouts and Marino. He's a top 3-5 QB without question.

fair enough.  and to be clear, i wasn't asking the question in an effort to "prove" that he's not top 5 worthy because where he ranks all time is subjective and purely opinionated.  but his pick last night got me thinking about his post season career and overall, he doesn't have a very flattering resume in jan/feb.  but if nothing else, he did hold it all together for that 1 championship season so that does put him above others without. 



Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 25, 2010, 11:08:35 AM
holy shtein dont EVER again include brett farve and donovan mcnabb in the same post again sarge

if you wanna knock farve from the top 5 all time best qb's that one thing but comparing him to mcnabb is a joke of epic porportions

and lol @ a superbowl not making a difference...especially when you pair them with farves unreal numbers

Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: reese125 on January 25, 2010, 11:13:13 AM
mcnabb vs favre...I dont know...Im torn.

and isnt pretty sad that of the 4th quarter comebacks and GW drives mcnabb does have, not one person remembers them. I wonder why.

Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 25, 2010, 11:26:42 AM
nobody remembers 4th and 26
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 25, 2010, 11:28:46 AM
Quote from: reese125 on January 25, 2010, 11:13:13 AM
and isnt pretty sad that of the 4th quarter comebacks and GW drives mcnabb does have, not one person remembers them. I wonder why.

there's really only 3 that stand out and come to mind. 

2000 @ pittsburgh. 

4th and 26 playoff game vs green bay. 

mnf @ giants (10-9 final)

but yeah, the rest are largely forgettable, presumably because none of them ever propelled the eagles to a championship. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 25, 2010, 11:30:34 AM
he had one in green bay in the rain that i remember
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Eagles_Legendz on January 25, 2010, 11:32:32 AM
2003 on MNF against Green Bay when he hit Pinkston in the end zone late was a nice drive too.  It's been a few years though.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: reese125 on January 25, 2010, 11:42:02 AM
apparently Childress had a $300,000 incentive clause in his contract with a win last night. that sucks.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: methdeez on January 25, 2010, 12:48:22 PM
Favre's Iron man record is amazing enough to get him in the hall of fame. That record will never be broken.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Tomahawk on January 25, 2010, 01:06:45 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 25, 2010, 10:07:14 AM
No. He won a championship. Unlike Fouts and Marino. He's a top 3-5 QB without question.

I disagree that Favre is top five all-time, but that's coming from a guy who believes Otto Graham is the best QB ever.

What I don't get about the game is some Vikings fans say the refs handed the game to the Saints. The Vikings were lucky to even have a chance to win after turning the ball over that many times
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 25, 2010, 01:28:14 PM
you can also make an argument that the saints were lucky to be in the game as they got dominated minus the turnovers

the refs were atrocious on the saints winning drive....the pass interference penalty was a joke at that point in the game...you just dont make that call you let the players decide it...i also thought the meachem catch was no good...but no way did the refs cost them the game....minnesota got 7 pts from the pass int in the end zone which was also weak


the nfl has a big problem in general with calling way to many pass interference penalties...and pass interference calls in the end zone should not be put at the one yard line...or at least make two different kinds...one where the corner is blatantly interfering to prevent a td (similar to the free path foul in the nba) and one where its incidental contact
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Feva on January 25, 2010, 01:50:41 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 25, 2010, 01:28:14 PM
you can also make an argument that the saints were lucky to be in the game as they got dominated minus the turnovers

the refs were atrocious on the saints winning drive....the pass interference penalty was a joke at that point in the game...you just dont make that call you let the players decide it...i also thought the meachem catch was no good...but no way did the refs cost them the game....minnesota got 7 pts from the pass int in the end zone which was also weak


the nfl has a big problem in general with calling way to many pass interference penalties...and pass interference calls in the end zone should not be put at the one yard line...or at least make two different kinds...one where the corner is blatantly interfering to prevent a td (similar to the free path foul in the nba) and one where its incidental contact

I agree... I think Meachem dropped/trapped that ball too...and that ball was completely uncatchable on that PI call.  I think they also blew the 4th and inches where Thomas jumped over the pile.  He had the ball knocked out of his hands and backwards and the ball ended up behind the 1st down line.  There was a real nice sideline view that showed it... although admittedly it was a pretty close call.

I've always felt the way the NFL penalizes PI needs to be tweaked.  It's ridiculous that a team can be penalized 50 yards or more on one play.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: reese125 on January 25, 2010, 02:11:08 PM
agree. interesting a player can rip someones facemask around almost breaking their neck and get 15 yards, but if that said player brushes his arm over a wr on a bomb before a catch it will cost him and the team 40 or 50 yds.

doesnt make sense that the PI call is the only penalty play in the game thats more than 15 yds....but if they change it, scoring will be down which the nfl wont like. might be a tough rule to change
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 25, 2010, 02:22:09 PM
Quote from: EagleFeva on January 25, 2010, 01:50:41 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 25, 2010, 01:28:14 PM
you can also make an argument that the saints were lucky to be in the game as they got dominated minus the turnovers

the refs were atrocious on the saints winning drive....the pass interference penalty was a joke at that point in the game...you just dont make that call you let the players decide it...i also thought the meachem catch was no good...but no way did the refs cost them the game....minnesota got 7 pts from the pass int in the end zone which was also weak


the nfl has a big problem in general with calling way to many pass interference penalties...and pass interference calls in the end zone should not be put at the one yard line...or at least make two different kinds...one where the corner is blatantly interfering to prevent a td (similar to the free path foul in the nba) and one where its incidental contact

I agree... I think Meachem dropped/trapped that ball too...and that ball was completely uncatchable on that PI call.  I think they also blew the 4th and inches where Thomas jumped over the pile.  He had the ball knocked out of his hands and backwards and the ball ended up behind the 1st down line.  There was a real nice sideline view that showed it... although admittedly it was a pretty close call.

I've always felt the way the NFL penalizes PI needs to be tweaked.  It's ridiculous that a team can be penalized 50 yards or more on one play.

i agree on the thomas call as well but i didnt bring it up because it was so close and almost an impossible call to overturn when youre talking about using camera angles to judge things that are in mid air...its different when youre talking about the goal line....but its a whole nother story when its about breaking an imaginary line versus a big white one
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: reese125 on January 25, 2010, 03:12:05 PM
how the f are the colts only 4.5 point favorites? I was shocked this wasnt tagged at -7

they just put up 30 pts against the #1 ranked def with a shutdown corner and crushed their run game. They werent able to run as effective with addai or brown against the ravens and jets (80 yds is respectable) which was expected, but now knowing you can def run on the saints adds a whole new dimension to the colts ridiculous offense. please explain.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 25, 2010, 03:14:24 PM
The Saints offense is worlds better than the Jets' offense.
The Colts' defense is worlds worse than the Vikings defense, which New Orleans scored 31 against.

Shootout.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: hbionic on January 25, 2010, 03:16:39 PM
Reese, the Colts run offense doesn't exactly scare the panties off little girl scouts asses. Saints have proved to use a good balance of run and pass. Which makes the passing that much more deadly.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: reese125 on January 25, 2010, 03:25:17 PM
that my point hb--the colts d smashed the jets run game which is their strong suit. you take that away from the saints they become one dimensional.

add to the fact that colts scored 30 against the best d, thats just more playing catch up for the saints.

and rj--not too sure where youre getting the colts d is worlds worse than the vikings. rethink.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 25, 2010, 03:26:39 PM
the line has nothing to do with what happened yesterday

the line for a colts saints superbowl was the same on saturday as it is today
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 25, 2010, 03:29:12 PM
Vikings D = 6th in the league, Colts D = 18th

Rocket science.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: hbionic on January 25, 2010, 03:31:34 PM
Reese, you're right...they smashed the Jets's only weapon.

Saints have rushing AND passing.

If they colts are stupid enought to play the saints like they did the jets...their caching staff should all be fired and the Saints are going to systematically rape the colts for a superbowl win.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: reese125 on January 25, 2010, 03:36:33 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 25, 2010, 03:29:12 PM
Vikings D = 6th in the league, Colts D = 18th

Rocket science.


colts outscored opponents 50-20 in playoffs. horrible d

rocket science
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: phattymatty on January 25, 2010, 03:37:26 PM
did anyone else feel like they were watching an eagles game at the end of regulation yesterday when the vikings were running the ball with under a minute left to try to set up the 50+ field goal?
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 25, 2010, 03:38:34 PM
Quote from: reese125 on January 25, 2010, 03:36:33 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 25, 2010, 03:29:12 PM
Vikings D = 6th in the league, Colts D = 18th

Rocket science.


seasonal stats means nothing in the playoffs. colts outscored opponents 50-20 in playoffs. horrible d

rocket science

I'm not getting into a Munson/IGY style argument with you about it, but you're trying to tell me that 16 games with the same defensive personel and coaches don't count, only the last two playoff games count, for the aribtrary reason that 'they're playoff games'? Sure thing, smart stuff.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: reese125 on January 25, 2010, 03:44:35 PM
you dont have to get an argument with me if you just except the fact the colts defense in not worlds worse than the vikings.

you have two of the best pass rushers in the league--wtf are you talking about?

Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: reese125 on January 25, 2010, 03:46:22 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on January 25, 2010, 03:37:26 PM
did anyone else feel like they were watching an eagles game at the end of regulation yesterday when the vikings were running the ball with under a minute left to try to set up the 50+ field goal?

how could you not--Brad Reid is the coach
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 25, 2010, 03:47:40 PM
the colts defense is not that much worse than the vikings but neither teams defense has anything to do with how or where the line was set

Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 25, 2010, 03:48:34 PM
Quote from: reese125 on January 25, 2010, 03:44:35 PM
you dont have to get an argument with me if you just except the fact the colts defense in not worlds worse than the vikings.

you have two of the best pass rushers in the league--wtf are you talking about?



You mean the two best other than Jared Allen?
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: reese125 on January 25, 2010, 03:52:26 PM
colts def sucks
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 25, 2010, 03:58:12 PM
They allow 40 yards per game more on the ground than the Vikings. I don't know what else you want to say about them. I'm not saying they suck, I'm saying they were in the middle of the pack in just about every defensive statistic while the Vikings were top 10. The end.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: reese125 on January 25, 2010, 04:05:46 PM
why do you get to end all the arguments?
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 25, 2010, 04:08:57 PM
That's what happens when you're right all the time.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: reese125 on January 25, 2010, 04:15:34 PM
oh..ok thanks
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 25, 2010, 04:29:40 PM
Quote from: methdeez on January 25, 2010, 12:48:22 PM
Favre's Iron man record is amazing enough to get him in the hall of fame. That record will never be broken.

If Peyton Manning hangs around long enough, he'll break it.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 25, 2010, 04:50:43 PM
Quote from: Munson on January 25, 2010, 04:29:40 PM
Quote from: methdeez on January 25, 2010, 12:48:22 PM
Favre's Iron man record is amazing enough to get him in the hall of fame. That record will never be broken.

If Peyton Manning hangs around long enough, he'll break it.

and if he doesnt hang around for another seven years or he gets hurt he wont break it
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: NC_Eagle on January 25, 2010, 05:56:42 PM
Quote from: SunMo on January 25, 2010, 10:01:37 AM
69,000 yards and almost 500 td is insane, that's not just some good stats

How much of that is due to his Ironman status? He also holds the record for most interceptions. Not saying he's a horrible QB by any means, but he'll kill you with a badly timed INT as often as he'll lead a game winning drive.  I've always thought of him as a throwback to the 60's/70's QBs who just put it up for grabs half the time.

I was grinning from ear to ear that his (possibly) last pass was an INT.



Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 25, 2010, 06:02:35 PM
Quote from: reese125 on January 25, 2010, 11:42:02 AM
apparently Childress had a $300,000 incentive clause in his contract with a win last night. that sucks.

So Favre, Peterson, Harvin and Berrians owe him $75,000 each. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 25, 2010, 06:43:49 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 25, 2010, 04:50:43 PM
Quote from: Munson on January 25, 2010, 04:29:40 PM
Quote from: methdeez on January 25, 2010, 12:48:22 PM
Favre's Iron man record is amazing enough to get him in the hall of fame. That record will never be broken.

If Peyton Manning hangs around long enough, he'll break it.

and if he doesnt hang around for another seven years or he gets hurt he wont break it

He seems to love the game so he could easily hang around for another 6 or 7. Injury is a possibility but he's played through them before and the Colts work damn hard to make sure he gets through games virtually untouched. He's probably enjoyed the best protection of any QB since 2000.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 25, 2010, 07:20:39 PM
I think you're missing his point, which is that you're an idiot.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Rome on January 25, 2010, 07:33:01 PM
A guy I work with has Dolphins season tickets.  He won the lottery for the Super Bowl like I did with the Jaguars tickets.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 25, 2010, 08:15:06 PM
Quote from: Rome on January 25, 2010, 07:33:01 PM
A guy I work with has Dolphins season tickets.  He won the lottery for the Super Bowl like I did with the Jaguars tickets.

are you farging serious?!?!  that would be such an awesome story if i gave a shtein. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Eagaholic on January 25, 2010, 08:25:50 PM
nm
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 25, 2010, 09:41:08 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 25, 2010, 07:20:39 PM
I think you're missing his point, which is that you're an idiot.

No, I got what he was trying to do. He's an idiot for trying to play that game.


Someone said there's no shot it gets broken when there is right now a player who could very easily break it. No shame in pointing that out.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 25, 2010, 09:47:22 PM
no he couldnt "very easily" do it idiot...thats the point...another point is the fact that youre even thinking about something that far away

if in seven years at age 41 hes even playing much less has the streak still in tact it would be almost a miracle...not "very easily" done
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 25, 2010, 09:57:25 PM
He's started every game since he's come into the league (something Brett Favre didn't do), and has taken much less of a beating than Favre has over his career. He's also on a team that's a virtual lock to be good for as long as he wants to play. The only way he misses out is if retires unexpectedly early.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 25, 2010, 10:04:27 PM
Quote from: Munson on January 25, 2010, 09:57:25 PM
The only way he misses out is if retires unexpectedly early.

or gets hurt or his skills fall off and he simply cant play anymore


you really are as dumb as everything thinks arent you
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 25, 2010, 10:11:29 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 25, 2010, 10:04:27 PM
you really are as dumb as everything thinks arent you

at this moment, munson has 4899 posts in this forum.  seeing as i can only recall munson only ever making 1 post that sort of made sense, the other 4898 of them seem to support your theory. 

btw, if munson is able to pump out that amount of stupid just by posting a couple times a day, imagine how horrible the rest of his day must be. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 25, 2010, 10:16:01 PM
You're arguing things that havn't happened before and you have no reason to believe they will. Of course "if" he gets injured...it hasn't happened before and he's been the most well protected QB in the league for a decade now. He is possibly the GOAT and doesn't need much mobility to play the way he plays. For him it'll be a simple matter of keeping his arm strength. He's not going to suddenly lose his flawless mechanics or accuracy because he turned a year older.


And nice calling me stupid and saying "everything thinks you are". A+.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Tomahawk on January 26, 2010, 02:12:02 AM
Here's a reason to believe:


40+ Year Old QBs
48, George Blanda, HoF
44, Steve DeBerg
44, Warren Moon, HoF
44, Vinny Testaverde
43, Doug Flutie
42, Earl Morrall
40, Charlie Conerly
40, Len Dawson, HoF
40, Vince Evans
40, Brett Favre, inevitable HoF
40, Joe Ferguson
40, Jim Hart
40, Brad Johnson
40, Sonny Jurgensen, HoF
40, Dave Krieg
40, Johnny Unitas, HoF
40, Wade Wilson, was on an active roster in his last year but didn't play

In the history of the NFL, only 16 QBs have played at or past 40 years of age. Of those 16, god only knows how many ended their careers as backups, or retired before they hit 40 and came back for a single season

He won't lose his flawless mechanics and accuracy because he turned a year older; he'll lose it because he turned two years older
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 26, 2010, 02:25:10 AM
I'll put my money on Manning being great until and including the final year he plays. The dude is very possibly the greatest of all time.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 26, 2010, 08:15:31 AM
Quote from: Tomahawk on January 26, 2010, 02:12:02 AM
Here's a reason to believe:

40+ Year Old QBs
48, George Blanda, HoF
44, Steve DeBerg
44, Warren Moon, HoF
44, Vinny Testaverde
43, Doug Flutie
42, Earl Morrall
40, Charlie Conerly
40, Len Dawson, HoF
40, Vince Evans
40, Brett Favre, inevitable HoF
40, Joe Ferguson
40, Jim Hart
40, Brad Johnson
40, Sonny Jurgensen, HoF
40, Dave Krieg
40, Johnny Unitas, HoF
40, Wade Wilson, was on an active roster in his last year but didn't play

i wonder how many of these guys played their last seven years without missing a game


Quote from: Tomahawk on January 26, 2010, 02:12:02 AM
He won't lose his flawless mechanics and accuracy because he turned a year older; he'll lose it because he turned two years older

or SEVEN years older

or he might lose the desire to go thru another training camp at age 37 or 38 or 40 and just not wanna play anymore

theres a lot of reasons only one person in the history of the league has even come close to what munson is proclaiming "easy"


Quote from: Munson on January 25, 2010, 10:16:01 PM
You're arguing things that havn't happened before and you have no reason to believe they will.

it has happened before...in fact its happening right now

and im not arguing anything but your absurd claim that peyton could "easily" do it when hes farging SEVEN years away

and speaking of arguing things that havent happened...

Quote from: Munson on January 25, 2010, 09:57:25 PM
The only way he misses out is if retires unexpectedly early.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on January 26, 2010, 09:06:10 AM
I'm a fan of Peyton Manning, I hope he gets into the HoF.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 26, 2010, 09:08:50 AM
Yeah, it's a real toss up right now...
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 26, 2010, 09:09:37 AM
lol
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 26, 2010, 12:32:28 PM
spotted on Vikings.com during the 4th quarter:

(http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/NFCChamps.jpg)
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 26, 2010, 04:29:27 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 26, 2010, 08:15:31 AM
Quote from: Tomahawk on January 26, 2010, 02:12:02 AM
Here's a reason to believe:

40+ Year Old QBs
48, George Blanda, HoF
44, Steve DeBerg
44, Warren Moon, HoF
44, Vinny Testaverde
43, Doug Flutie
42, Earl Morrall
40, Charlie Conerly
40, Len Dawson, HoF
40, Vince Evans
40, Brett Favre, inevitable HoF
40, Joe Ferguson
40, Jim Hart
40, Brad Johnson
40, Sonny Jurgensen, HoF
40, Dave Krieg
40, Johnny Unitas, HoF
40, Wade Wilson, was on an active roster in his last year but didn't play

i wonder how many of these guys played their last seven years without missing a game


Quote from: Tomahawk on January 26, 2010, 02:12:02 AM
He won't lose his flawless mechanics and accuracy because he turned a year older; he'll lose it because he turned two years older

or SEVEN years older

or he might lose the desire to go thru another training camp at age 37 or 38 or 40 and just not wanna play anymore

theres a lot of reasons only one person in the history of the league has even come close to what munson is proclaiming "easy"


Quote from: Munson on January 25, 2010, 10:16:01 PM
You're arguing things that havn't happened before and you have no reason to believe they will.

it has happened before...in fact its happening right now

and im not arguing anything but your absurd claim that peyton could "easily" do it when hes farging SEVEN years away

and speaking of arguing things that havent happened...

Quote from: Munson on January 25, 2010, 09:57:25 PM
The only way he misses out is if retires unexpectedly early.


Don't know where you're getting your numbers at IGY but as of right now he'd break the record in week 14 of the 2014 season. That's not 7 years.

And no, he's never been seriously injured in season, he enjoys the best protection in the NFL, and his skills have yet to diminish even one decimal. You're arguing things that have not happened yet and things he hasn't given you any indication that will happen.


You can keep betting against him....the dude is a machine. The GOAT machine.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 26, 2010, 04:44:02 PM
as usual everyone gets it but you
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 26, 2010, 04:47:56 PM
munson is a machine.  the DUMB machine.

this argument is mind numbingly retarded btw. 
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 26, 2010, 05:28:21 PM
I love your lack of math skills IGY. 4 and 14/16ths of a season, which he could very very very very easily play, does not equate to 7 years older.

But you keep running with that.

Edit-I think it's actually 5 and a half seasons, not 4 and a half...still not 7 years older.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Diomedes on January 26, 2010, 06:42:00 PM
you all suck zesty dick
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Rome on January 26, 2010, 07:03:41 PM
i wonder if you really typed "zesty" there.if so, bravo, because i laughed.if not, it's still funny, only slightly less funny.sort of like munson is only slightly slower than the roadrunner.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: Munson on January 26, 2010, 07:32:51 PM
Maybe if I strap and acme rocket to myself it'll backfire and blow up IGY.
Title: Re: 2009 Playoff Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on January 26, 2010, 10:28:12 PM
Quote from: Munson on January 26, 2010, 07:32:51 PM
Maybe if I strap and acme rocket to myself it'll backfire and blow up IGY.

fail