(http://www.sean21taylor.com/guestbook/images/ST_43percent%20transparent-title.jpg)
:-D
They couldn't even beat Dallas yesterday? Jesus Christ.
Even the Eagles might be able to pull this one out.
No Portis, no Betts, maybe no Haynesworth and half their OL missing. Probably another 4-point margin here. And whatever no-name RB they sign this week will get at least 60 yards...
London Fletcher and Rocky McIntosh won't drop picks, Haynesworth will play and dominate, Edwin Williams and the rest of that rag tag OL will stonewall the Eagles....
Eagles should win by 20, and will eek one out by 3.
eke. eek is for halloween only
Haha.
Oh shtein is for Thanksgiving weekend.
This game has 10-7 written all over it.
http://www.extremeskins.com/showthread.php?t=309340
The annual "I'm going to Philly, should I be scared" thread.
the Eagles open as 9.5-pt favorites, O/U 40.5
(http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/130/sig1pk5.jpg) Hit, Hit, Shoot in dick, check id first then hit
and LOL at the Racist team calling philly racist.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 23, 2009, 03:31:58 PM
http://www.extremeskins.com/showthread.php?t=309340
The annual "I'm going to Philly, should I be scared" thread.
Stay home you flags.
Reading a few posts there, I believe they prefer to be called stillupfronts.
Quote from: BigEd76 on November 23, 2009, 07:45:58 PM
the Eagles open as 9.5-pt favorites, O/U 40.5
Taking the under - Skins have the #1 pass D in the NFL and if the Eagles can't get a big play they lose. I wouldn't be surprised to see 15-12 or some field goal crap score
the black alternate jerseys make another appearance this weekend in memory of fallen hero Sean Taylor
and here's the map (http://the506.com/nflmaps/2009/12-FOX-E.html) (Albert/Moose/Goose again)
Black jersey? Next.
Quote from: BigEd76 on November 25, 2009, 03:56:04 PM
the black alternate jerseys make another appearance this weekend in memory of fallen hero Sean Taylor
and here's the map (http://the506.com/nflmaps/2009/12-FOX-E.html) (Albert/Moose/Goose again)
This is most certainly another BWW weekend. Freaking Rams...
they should have another 75th anniversary
(http://www.pabook.libraries.psu.edu/palitmap/ThrowbackUniforms.jpg)
Fly Parakeets Fly!
black jersey's = pimp
no, they are gimmicky.
we all know why they dont wear the kelly greens. that would be thing to see once or twice a year. not a random 3rd jersey that banner and co. can $ off of. farg marketing kelly green 5's would be ill. but that would acknowledge that the franchise existed before lurie's parents bought it for him, so....
which is funny because who doesn't think that kelly greens wouldn't outsell the black alternates 100x over? hell, if they did a kelly green throwback once or twice a year, i bet they'd even outsell the midnight greens. the eagles would make so much more loot off a kelly green alternate it's not even funny.
kelly green mcnabb, westbrook, pimp, celek, maclin, shady? uh, yes please.
So MDS who hates on #5 just to suckle on IGY's teet wants a kelly green 5? Hm.
The Black jersey's are okay, but they only look good with the midnight green pants. Black pants would be pretty sweet.
it was an example, sweetums.
You coulda picked any number....your McNabb mancrush is no longer hidden.
and your obsession with mds & igy borders on the pathological. find somewhere else to play - preferably a mine field.
black jersey's are horrible, everybody does them. be original. KELLY GREEN SON
They tried original. Baby blue and yellow is certainly more original than black.
those jerseys were awful
they had an excuse to go with the kellys and they didnt. instead they go with the frankford yellow jackets bullshtein. typical lurie. cant even admit they had success before he came along.
did the eagles have success before lurie? was the buddy era more successful than now? not even close. was a more likable team and coaching staff, but far less productive in the w/l column and playoff success.
They won 3 NFL Championships wearing Kelly Green.
really? the most recent was 30+ years before lurie bought the team. try again.
Try again what? Who cares how much success they had, its about what looks good. Just because the phillies of the 80s and early 90s were bad doesn't spot the fat P from being cooler than cool.
Lol @ sarge
You are losing it old man.
Quote from: SunMo on November 26, 2009, 06:07:18 PM
Try again what? Who cares how much success they had, its about what looks good. Just because the phillies of the 80s and early 90s were bad doesn't spot the fat P from being cooler than cool.
POTW
Quote from: SunMo on November 26, 2009, 06:07:18 PM
Try again what? Who cares how much success they had, its about what looks good. Just because the phillies of the 80s and early 90s were bad doesn't spot the fat P from being cooler than cool.
did you read anything i posted? i already said that doing the kelly green throwbacks as the alternate instead of the black one would not only look better, but they would sell like nobody's business.
the whole "argument" was about a statement mds said about lurie not wanting to acknowledge the "success" of the eagles before he bought the team and i said that this team wasn't really all that successful before lurie bought it. 3 nfl championships 40 years ago doesn't = success.
anyway, point is kelly green alternates would be str8 butta
doesnt matter if they won more now than before. they had teams and played games. win or lose he refuses to admit it happened.
Kelly Green is a lie perpetrated by Buddy Ryan worshipers in an attempt to control the media.
Quote from: MDS on November 27, 2009, 01:15:05 AM
win or lose he refuses to admit it happened.
doubtful. people want to leave their own mark on things when they are in charge. they want their "legacy" to be tied to specific ideas/changes/etc. in the case of lurie, it's the eagles jersey color and logo. whether the eagles win a sb or not is almost irrelevent. 50 years from now when the eagles are wearing another colored jersey, the midnight green and logo will be affiliated with lurie's tenure as owner.
he doesn't want to make money off of the old logo and colors because it wasn't his. the new colors and logo are his and he will always be linked to them from now till infinity. i seriously doubt he refused to acknowledge the history of this team. he probably just doesn't care about it because he didn't make any money off of it. the sad thing about it though is that he also doesn't realize how much loot he could make right now if he did come out with the kelly greens even just one time.
are you defending that or breaking it down?
Quote from: Father Demon on November 25, 2009, 06:15:26 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on November 25, 2009, 03:56:04 PM
the black alternate jerseys make another appearance this weekend in memory of fallen hero Sean Taylor
and here's the map (http://the506.com/nflmaps/2009/12-FOX-E.html) (Albert/Moose/Goose again)
This is most certainly another BWW weekend. Freaking Rams...
QuoteCarolina @ NY Jets
Thom Brennaman, Brian Billick
Oh FFS...what I get for living in NC... :paranoid
Munson...did you say you liked the black jersey's with GREEN pants?
Barf.
Come on, dude
The only thing more awesomer than the black/green combo is the green/green combo.
(http://cache1.asset-cache.net/xc/81416589.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF1934B869679A269F9CC55CD29E45806BE4626FD13ED7B73D4BC)
Straight butta....
Yeah I love that all dark shtein.
I don't know what you're talkin about Phreak, at least the black/green looks a little cool...black shirts/white pants just looks lame.
style tips from munson
there it is
I just wore my slim boot jeans and white thermal to work tonight....You woulda liked the way my butt looked.
skinny jeans, of course. fag.
No, if I wore skinny jeans I would have said skinny jeans.
Slim boot=slim bootcut.
Know your jeans.
whatever you say homo
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
I'd like to interrupt you two necking like a couple of fashion week Romes....
The green/green is butta.
The black/green is horrible.
Anything other than the kelly greens = fail. The green/green is the least worst, but that ain't saying much.
QuoteAmong the biggest challenges this week will be the fact that the Eagles are facing the top red-zone defense in the NFL. Washington has allowed 21 drives in the red zone and only seven touchdowns.
#1 ranked pass defense
tough red zone defense
The Eagles have to commit to the run tomorrow. Even though their secondary can be beaten, their defense has played really well. A throw-fest from Big Red is the wrong way to go after them. Especially with Haynesworth being doubtful.
Chalk this one up as a loss, then?
a loss would do wonders
anything that leads mcnabb and reid out of town is good. losing at home to the racists is a start.
green/green is farging awful. black/green not much better. the black jersey/white pants looks good, i just don't particularly care for the black alt jersey.
(http://product.images.fansedge.com/31-98/31-98827-F.jpg)(http://www.escape-to-the-seventies.com/images/sports/33-50217-F.jpg)
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2561/4143876106_ec86ed42e0_o.jpg)
There are only a few people here like 64 or Susq who might know the homeboy in the last pic, but thats the uni's I was first introduced too, and I've loved them ever since. I like the midnight green ones, but the Kelly green from the late 70's and early 80's are flat out the best uni's I've ever seen in the NFL. Would love too see them brought back. I'd buy the hell outta' them.
Quote from: MDS on November 28, 2009, 11:55:32 PM
a loss would do wonders
anything that leads mcnabb and reid out of town is good. losing at home to the racists is a start.
lol Todd...when will you learn? Take a breath from the sack of igy and realize that a loss would not eliminate McNabb or Reid from this city.
Better root for them to do well because Cousin Lurie isn't making any changes.
QuoteHaynesworth out vs. Eagles
Posted by Michael David Smith on November 29, 2009 9:46 AM ET
Washington taterskins defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth will be inactive for today's game against the Philadelphia Eagles, Jason La Canfora of NFL Network is reporting.
Haynesworth, who is listed as questionable with an ankle injury, did make the trip to Philadelphia with the team. But he is apparently going to need to miss his second consecutive game.
After signing a lucrative contract in the off-season, Haynesworth started the taterskins' first nine games, recording three sacks and playing well against the run. But the ankle injury is an ongoing concern.
The 3-7 taterskins take on the 6-4 Eagles at 1 p.m. Eastern.
taterskins CB DeAngelo Hall is also inactive
Reid tries the opening kick off as on onsides....fail.
Campbell TD. I agree with the crowd: BOOOOOOOOO!!
Dumbest team in football.
Sucks not to get a TD on that dominant drive.
I am following the game today from the itnernet. What happened on the Celek Pass interference call? Was it blatant?
Quote from: methdeez on November 29, 2009, 01:18:37 PM
I am following the game today from the itnernet. What happened on the Celek Pass interference call? Was it blatant?
Pretty much. I don't know that it actually affected the touchdown, but Celek got his hands up on the guy defending him.
Pimp just barely missed taking that PR to the house.
DeSean almost looking Pimp on that punt return
That second and third down sucked.
Vick sucks - quit putting him in there for critical downs
Get the farging clown out of there!!
Wasted farging play!
Wasted farging effort!
Surprising conversion. Reid should ruin it by continuing to put Vick in the game
How are there no Skins within 10 yards of Jackson? LOL.
I love Pimp, but what the farg is that dance about?!
Quote from: QB Eagles on November 29, 2009, 01:33:39 PM
How are there no Skins within 10 yards of Jackson? LOL.
Not like he's somebody you'd worry about taking one to the house. :paranoid
Quote from: QB Eagles on November 29, 2009, 01:33:39 PM
How are there no Skins within 10 yards of Jackson? LOL.
Hopefully they keep on blowing coverages; that play was farging awesome
How do the Eagles give up 14 yards on a third down screen against that piece of shtein offense?
Quote from: QB Eagles on November 29, 2009, 01:39:15 PM
How do the Eagles give up 14 yards on a third down screen against that piece of shtein offense?
piece of shtein defense ?
Looks like the semi-annual 35-31 Skins-Eagles shootout is shaping up...
Brutal third down defense on that drive.
Trotter...pass defense king... :boom
Good - the play would have been called back even if McNabb could have hit Maclin for the TD
1st and 25
Skins defense is no pushover. The offense is another story and how they have 14 points already is pathetic.
Boo!
-7 yards on that drive. Way to respond to the Skins TD.
Short field. Great.
Glad to see the team has learned from the excessive amount of penalties they've been flagged for over the past few weeks.
3rd down stop!
Shocking! Sign them all to long term contracts.
How many runs on this drive here?
Quote from: QB Eagles on November 29, 2009, 02:03:47 PM
How many runs on this drive here?
Already more than I would have guessed, but I didn't expect them to convert either
Samuel may not be able to tackle well, but he sure as farg can catch
All he does is make interceptions.
He should have scored.
14 run; 14 pass
WTF
Good penalty. Now they have more room to pass
Run the ball aaaaallllll the way down the field... only to stop it and pass, pass, pass in the red zone. :boom
farg Andy Reid.
1st and goal, 2nd and goal, 3rd and goal.... how many throws into the endzone?
Why these stupid routes 7 yards short of the end zone?
Throwing short of the goal line on 3rd and short == WIN.
Asante again! Thanks for getting up this time...
Quote from: Tomahawk on November 29, 2009, 02:13:16 PM
Samuel may not be able to tackle well, but he sure as farg can catch
^^^^this
Looks like Samuel wants a free trip to Hawaii this year!
Now there's the Jason Campbell we all know and love.
Quote from: NC_Eagle on November 29, 2009, 02:26:17 PM
Looks like Samuel wants a free trip to Hawaii Miami this year!
If he came here I'd probably go to the game just to throw rotten mangos at him for every tackle he's whiffed on this season. Be one hell of a big bag.
They probably could have gotten another endzone shot in and still had time for the FG... but McNabb probably would have thrown it to someone at the 10 yard line.
Quote from: Don Ho on November 29, 2009, 02:28:48 PM
Quote from: NC_Eagle on November 29, 2009, 02:26:17 PM
Looks like Samuel wants a free trip to Hawaii Miami this year!
If he came here I'd probably go to the game just to throw rotten mangos at him for every tackle he's whiffed on this season. Be one hell of a big bag.
True, but my thinking was that Pro Bowl CB picks seem to be more for guys with allot of picks vs good tacklers.
Quote from: NC_Eagle on November 29, 2009, 02:31:57 PM
Quote from: Don Ho on November 29, 2009, 02:28:48 PM
Quote from: NC_Eagle on November 29, 2009, 02:26:17 PM
Looks like Samuel wants a free trip to Hawaii Miami this year!
If he came here I'd probably go to the game just to throw rotten mangos at him for every tackle he's whiffed on this season. Be one hell of a big bag.
True, but my thinking was that Pro Bowl CB picks seem to be more for guys with allot of picks vs good tacklers.
Deion's in the HOF...
Quote from: QB Eagles on November 29, 2009, 02:33:38 PM
Quote from: NC_Eagle on November 29, 2009, 02:31:57 PM
Quote from: Don Ho on November 29, 2009, 02:28:48 PM
Quote from: NC_Eagle on November 29, 2009, 02:26:17 PM
Looks like Samuel wants a free trip to Hawaii Miami this year!
If he came here I'd probably go to the game just to throw rotten mangos at him for every tackle he's whiffed on this season. Be one hell of a big bag.
True, but my thinking was that Pro Bowl CB picks seem to be more for guys with allot of picks vs good tacklers.
Deion's in the HOF...
Uh...he probably will be but:
QuoteTo be eligible for the nominating process, a player must have been retired at least five years, and a coach must be retired (as of 2007, retired for five years). Any other contributor such as a team owner or executive can be voted at any time.
QuoteIn January 2006, Sanders once again retired from the NFL, becoming an analyst for the NFL Network.
Quote from: NC_Eagle on November 29, 2009, 02:31:57 PM
True, but my thinking was that Pro Bowl CB picks seem to be more for guys with allot of picks vs good tacklers.
Exactly. Remember Larry Brown from the Cowboys? What did he have? 2 picks in the Super Bowl against the Steelers one of which was a gift from Neil O'Donnell and he cashed in handsomely. Signed a huge contract with the Raiders and never did a thing the rest of his career.
Reid seems to be running this game but the red zone woes continue. What is up with this offense?
Asante would have caught that
I hope Pimp is okay
This third down shtein is getting out of hand.
they're gonna lose, they cant stop 3rd down plays, farg them
McCoy had 9 carries in the first half. At the end of the 3rd, he has a total of 11
They just let Byron Westbrook make a play. They're in deep shtein.
GET WESTBROOK!
This is about as bad as it gets
How many passes is Celek gonna drop?
Celek needs to catch a ball.
How much time does McNabb think he has?
This is game over
The fact that the Eagles are giving the Cowboys a two game lead is sickening.
how boring have they managed to make this game, maybe its me, but i have zero interest in this game
How do you go from being so good to sucking so bad against the fargin taterskins
When was this team ever so good? They were garbage against Chicago.
Run the fargin ball!!! they are not respecting the run at all. good freakin lord man.
Quote from: phillymic2000 on November 29, 2009, 03:39:06 PM
Run the fargin ball! they are not respecting the run at all. good freakin lord man.
Eagles football.
Looks like Avant came to play... too bad he's hurt now.
Refs missed Avant getting facemasked
Quote from: EagleFeva on November 29, 2009, 03:40:14 PM
Looks like Avant came to play... too bad he's hurt now.
well with two wr's out, throw fargin more fat man!
McCoy had 45 yards rushing in the 1st half, 51 yards right now. Sigh.
Play action :-D way to waste time.
As if things haven't been bad enough... let's throw Vick in.
Why put Vick in? Ever
Nice throw by Vick. :-D
Hey it's McCoy... I forgot he was still in the game.
hey that throw looked like McNabb!! nice call Reid/Marty
Holy cow a run play! :D
Buckley? why
Run fargin Weaver and McCoy you idiots
What the farg is Buckley doing in the game?
Once again... Eldra freakin' Buckley? Really?!
omg, WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY :boom
And Reid's keeping him in. Why?
Buckley again... :boom
Now that the run is out of the way... here comes two pass plays. :boo
Marty couldn't fool a one legged Helen Fargin Keller
TD, but still how is Buckley the goal line back over McCoy or Weaver?
Rollout to the TE! :-D :-D :boom
TD Buckley.
Jesus... why does that shtein have to be so hard?
:-D another wasted time out, Im stunned
how do you not have that play ready to go?
Great effort by Shady. :yay
Good - take everybody out
:o a first down running play, and it worked.
Will this count as a 4th quarter comeback if McNabb leads the team to a score and the Eagles end up winning or is there too much time left still?
Nice running to start out the drive
that was a great throw and catch!
BEAUTIFUL throw by McNabb. :yay
Another nice pitch and catch.
Another great throw and catch
Quote from: King Cole on November 29, 2009, 03:36:42 PM
When was this team ever so good? They were garbage against Chicago.
I was tallking about Celek
Almost - I'm becoming a huge fan of McCoy
Shady has been a shoestring away from a couple TD's today.
him and Maclin need to hold the ball a little tighter, they scare the shtein out of me sometimes. But you really couldnt expect more from rookies.
freakin pansie
a lot of time on the clock :paranoid
They really need more plays. They've run that damn TE rollout about 5 times today in key situations. IT DOES NOT FOOL ANYONE ANYMORE!!!
Nice tackle at the 16
What the farg is with this D letting the deadskins score 24 against them? Thats four games of scoring for them.
This D sucks
oops
Parker is an idiot
2 4th quarter comebacks in a row?
they are the bestest!!
Quote from: EagleFeva on November 29, 2009, 04:14:42 PM
2 4th quarter comebacks in a row?
Granted... they had NO business being behind in the 4th quarter of either of those games, but... still.
Atlanta will feast on this team next week.
Too many penalties. Not enough D. Should have blown the skins out. Atlanta looks like a double digit loss.
atlanta blows and matt ryan got hurt
as bad as this team is i see no reason why the cant run the table. i also see no reason why they cant lose out. basically the nfc sucks ass and besides new orleans and minny its a crapshoot of mediocrity.
What type of injury did Ryan sustain?
Regardless, Turner will run rampant on this D.
Damn this team, they suckered me in when they started throwing to Avant. At least this year I know they're suckering me in, but they're going to make me lower my guard again at some point. Mother fargers.
Quote from: shorebird on November 29, 2009, 04:25:18 PM
What type of injury did Ryan sustain?
I think they said it was a toe injury.
concussion for DeSean
Reid takes responsibility for the onsides kick and the first couple of questions were about it
the onsides was a good idea
just use it in a game not at home against the last place team. like week 17 against dallas. or a playoff game. go big or go home with a call like that.
Quote from: MDS on November 29, 2009, 04:33:53 PM
the onsides was a good idea
It would have been a good idea if they had recovered the ball, as it was, NO, it was not a good idea.
Quote from: MDS on November 29, 2009, 04:33:53 PM
the onsides was a good idea
just use it in a game not at home against the last place team. like week 17 against dallas. or a playoff game. go big or go home with a call like that.
No it wasn't a good idea. Not at all.
That was the 4th time under Reid that they've tried that bullshtein... and twice it's backfired in a big way on them.
The play was there, there wasn't a taterskin in sight.....just couldn't get an Eagles player on the ball. Not that it would have mattered as Joe Mays farged it up from the get go.
LOL
It was beyond farging stupid.
It was not only completely unnecessary, it was exactly the sort of over-analyzing embarrassment that has consistently been the difference between winning big games and losing them.
I was actively praying for that fat farg to die during the game and I'm not even kidding.
unnecessary is a good word.
the call itself is a good one to go with in a game where you need some sort of fluky break to help win. like a potential playoff game against the saints. this game is not that.
If this pathetic bullshtein team had a seething, bloodthirsty defense I could see them pulling that bullshtein but they don't. They are totally average in every respect and that's why they keep lousy teams close and get embarrassed by good ones.
Giving a miserable offensive team like the taterskins any help whatsoever is the clinical definition of absolute idiocy.
I think people here are more angry after this win then they are after some of the losses that go on.
The only thing I'm mad about is Celek's poor performance. Reid outsmarted himself again, nothing new there. I think I'm getting used to the stupid penalties.
Just not worth it. Don't anyone bother.
Quote from: General_Failure on November 29, 2009, 07:14:46 PM
The only thing I'm mad about is Celek's poor performance. Reid outsmarted himself again, nothing new there. I think I'm getting used to the stupid penalties.
Yeah that was a bit deflating considering he's been a real bright spot this year. I did see a lot of tape on his left thumb though/they actually showed the trainer taping up his thumb during the 4th corner. Reid didn't do injuries outside of Jackson during his PC though.
1. The on-side kick was stupid. Not the act of leading off the game with one, but doing against a team who is going nowhere fast is stupid. If it fails, and it did, it gives this underdog loser team momentum...which it did.
2. 3rd down defense...farging pitiful
3. Not enough blitzing and playing WAY too soft against their receivers
4. Stupid penalties (AGAIN)
5. McNabb leads another game tying/game winning drive
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 29, 2009, 10:01:59 PM5. McNabb leads another game tying/game winning drive
enough of this mcnabb propaganda
its not about doing the simple things like leading a drive mid way through the fourth quarter to tie the game against a 3-win team. most qbs can do that. its about doing what vince young did today. its about doing these kinds of things in the playoffs.
mcnabb has never done that and doesnt appear to have the balls to ever do it. ive come to grips with that. i accept it.
Quote from: MDS on November 29, 2009, 10:12:46 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 29, 2009, 10:01:59 PM5. McNabb leads another game tying/game winning drive
enough of this mcnabb propaganda
its not about doing the simple things like leading a drive mid way through the fourth quarter to tie the game against a 3-win team. most qbs can do that. its about doing what vince young did today. its about doing these kinds of things in the playoffs.
mcnabb has never done that and doesnt appear to have the balls to ever do it. ive come to grips with that. i accept it.
Come on man..........take the good with the bad. That's our QB.
Drift back in time - the period between #12 and #5 - and be thankful for what we have in our QB
Quote from: MDS on November 29, 2009, 10:12:46 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 29, 2009, 10:01:59 PM5. McNabb leads another game tying/game winning drive
enough of this mcnabb propaganda
its not about doing the simple things like leading a drive mid way through the fourth quarter to tie the game against a 3-win team. most qbs can do that. its about doing what vince young did today. its about doing these kinds of things in the playoffs.
mcnabb has never done that and doesnt appear to have the balls to ever do it. ive come to grips with that. i accept it.
No...if the clowns who like to point out every little thing he supposedly cannot do, then I'm going to point out every little thing he gets credit for.
agreed
It really sucks that McNabb didn't lead a 90 yard drive today. Oh wait, he did. Well, he did it without converting three fourth downs.
thats not what im saying
i never said mcnabb sucks. he is and was and probably will be a good qb in this league. hes probably going to the hall, if that even means anything in football.
what were talking about here is super bowls. thats the only thing that matters. mcnabb has proven hes not a guy who can win you a super bowl. the defense sucks, the coach is an idiot. its probably going to stay that way. they wont this year. or next year. its over for him here.
So what the farg does that have to do with Vince Young? Can he stop the run?
lol at the anti mcnabb talk....still
ES is all fired up about the officiating.
To their credit, a few have stepped up and said that every team gets screwed once in awhile and the calls did not cost the Skins the game - only to be shouted down by the bubba's of the board.
It's funny because I haven't seen then mention that
1. Samuel got horsecollared
2. Avant got facemasked TWICE on his long catch down the side line
3. The holding call on Peters where he flung Carter to the ground was bullshtein
Quote"When you have a talented team like we have, every now and then you have to bring that nasty attitude out and if it's a spark by me by what I say, or just maybe my play or even just me being there, that's what I look forward to doing," McNabb said, adding that he couldn't repeat what he said in the huddle in the fourth quarter because there was some colorful language. "And when you look across the board, yes, they are young. But I think they played enough games where they understand how to prepare and what to expect."
Not a leader!
Even the haters gotta admit McNabb's been lookin a bit more Garcia/Gritty out there....of course they won't or will say it's fake or too late....but whatevs.
replay on NFL Network Tuesday at 8 ET
01 vs. Rams L 29-24*
02 vs. Bucs L 27-10*
03 vs. Panthers L 14-3^
04 vs. Patriots L 24-21^
08 vs. Cardinals L 35-28*
* = had drive to tie/win/cut lead late in 4th and failed
^ = 3 interceptions
0/5
0%
Yes, because Vince Young would have totally won those games.
And what about the GB 4th and 26 game? Or I guess we're just ignoring the times the team wins and giving him no credit, and placing the losses solely on him. I got it.
90% of the QB's in the league fail to come up in big situations constantly....stop thinking that No McNabb = Getting a Peyton Manning or Tom Brady. Because the odds say that's not going to happen.
even 1/5 id take.
get off mcnabbs cock. he doesnt even want you on it. he hates you because you booed him on draft day and hurt his wittle feelings.
Yeah I heard he loses on purpose to get back at us mean fans.
you mean he didnt puke on purpose?
You didn't see him stick his fingers down his throat?
McNabb played well this week.
Of course, that's irrelevant because a week-by-week assessment of McNabb at this point in his career serves no purpose. Anyone who has watched the Eagles the last 10 seasons is aware of the fact that McNabb is capable of playing well for long stretches in a season.
They still aren't winning the SB; McNabb isn't getting younger; McNabb isn't getting better.
Quote from: MDS on November 30, 2009, 12:54:28 AM
01 vs. Rams L 29-24*
02 vs. Bucs L 27-10*
03 vs. Panthers L 14-3^
04 vs. Patriots L 24-21^
08 vs. Cardinals L 35-28*
* = had drive to tie/win/cut lead late in 4th and failed
^ = 3 interceptions
0/5
0%
@#$$#^%(#@!$(#%(!@))!($)(!! X 150 Zillion
Why the hell was McNabb wearing his little mittens in 60 degree weather?
He didn't want to get chicken grease and watermelon juice on his hands.
See what I did there?
it was so funny watching the mcnabb plead with the ref that his arm was going forward and thus they should keep the ball
ummm it was an interception big guy not a fumble and there are still no ties in the superbowl
Quote from: shorebird on November 29, 2009, 04:26:01 PM
Regardless, Turner will run rampant on this D.
I doubt it - Turner had 12 carries for only 33 yards against a horrible Bucaneers rush defense. Gonzalez will probably have 20 catches for 236 yards and 3 TDs
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 30, 2009, 09:06:37 AM
it was so funny watching the mcnabb plead with the ref that his arm was going forward and thus they should keep the ball
ummm it was an interception big guy not a fumble and there are still no ties in the superbowl
He was doing that before he even knew it was picked off
Quote from: Tomahawk on November 30, 2009, 09:21:05 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 30, 2009, 09:06:37 AM
it was so funny watching the mcnabb plead with the ref that his arm was going forward and thus they should keep the ball
ummm it was an interception big guy not a fumble and there are still no ties in the superbowl
He was doing that before he even knew it was picked off
and well after
Quote from: BigEd76 on November 30, 2009, 12:27:43 AM
replay on NFL Network Tuesday at 8 ET
lol....I wanted to kill myself a couple of times and almost had about three heart attacks during that game.
I don't think I'll be watching.
My little insight about the onside kick is this.
When this team scores, it doesn't seem like yards-to-goal matters. The big play is obviously not their problem, more like converting third downs, short yardage and red zone. It almost seems like sometimes DJack works better with 70 yards in front of him.
That means that they are taking an obvious risk to alleviate a problem that they don't really have.
I mean it's not that logical, but it just seems like to me that when they score, they can do it from anywhere on the field, and when they don't have it together it doesn't matter what their field position is.
Also, the pattern on special teams this year has been:
suck, suck, suck, Djack! (repeat)
so i don't know why they were so confident that they could get it done.
I don't think DJack gets the ball enough
Quote from: methdeez on November 30, 2009, 01:01:20 PM
My little insight about the onside kick is this.
When this team scores, it doesn't seem like yards-to-goal matters. The big play is obviously not their problem, more like converting third downs, short yardage and red zone. It almost seems like sometimes DJack works better with 70 yards in front of him.
That means that they are taking an obvious risk to alleviate a problem that they don't really have.
I mean it's not that logical, but it just seems like to me that when they score, they can do it from anywhere on the field, and when they don't have it together it doesn't matter what their field position is.
Also, the pattern on special teams this year has been:
suck, suck, suck, Djack! (repeat)
so i don't know why they were so confident that they could get it done.
i think youre overanalyzing it....they tried the onside kick for one reason and one reason only...because they saw something on film that led them to believe it would work
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 30, 2009, 01:09:01 PM
Quote from: methdeez on November 30, 2009, 01:01:20 PM
My little insight about the onside kick is this.
When this team scores, it doesn't seem like yards-to-goal matters. The big play is obviously not their problem, more like converting third downs, short yardage and red zone. It almost seems like sometimes DJack works better with 70 yards in front of him.
That means that they are taking an obvious risk to alleviate a problem that they don't really have.
I mean it's not that logical, but it just seems like to me that when they score, they can do it from anywhere on the field, and when they don't have it together it doesn't matter what their field position is.
Also, the pattern on special teams this year has been:
suck, suck, suck, Djack! (repeat)
so i don't know why they were so confident that they could get it done.
i think youre overanalyzing it....they tried the onside kick for one reason and one reason only...because they saw something on film that led them to believe it would work
the sad thing is it did work, minus Joe Mays running in front of the play, and touchign the ball, making it bounce wide, and Gocong taking a horrible route towards the ball. Engineer needs to learn angles
so it worked except the part about recovering the ball
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 30, 2009, 01:12:17 PM
so it worked except the part about recovering the ball
i think thats what i'm going with
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 30, 2009, 09:06:37 AM
it was so funny watching the mcnabb plead with the ref that his arm was going forward and thus they should keep the ball
ummm it was an interception big guy not a fumble and there are still no ties in the superbowl
and you dont get 4 time outs.