ConcreteBoard

Football => The Rest of the NFL => Topic started by: reese125 on February 05, 2009, 02:31:39 PM

Title: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: reese125 on February 05, 2009, 02:31:39 PM
started at 12pm today

some candidates:

M. Cassell, Nnamdi Asomugha, Kurt Warner, Karlos Dansby, Yeremiah Bell, O.J. Atogwe, Michael Koenen, R. Lewis, T. Suggs, B Scott, Jason Brown, Sean Jones, Shayne Graham, Julius Peppers, Jordan Gross, Jason Hanson, Dunta Robinson, Kelvin Hayden, DeAngelo Hall, Rob Bironas, Antonio Bryant, and Jonathan Vilma.

1) Matt Cassellllllll QB NE
2) Brandon Jacobs RB NY
3) Michael Koenen K ATL
4) Shayne Graham K CIN
5) Karlos Dansby LB ARI
6) Terrell Suggs DL BAL
7) Antonio Bryant WR TB
8) Darren Sproels RB SD
9) Oshiomogho Atogwe S STL
10) Bo Scaife TE TEN
11) Dunta Robinson DB HOU
12) LeRoy Hill LB SEA
13) Julius Peppers DE CAR
14) Max Starks OL PIT
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: SunMo on February 05, 2009, 02:33:16 PM
it's good to have all this information in one place
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Diomedes on February 05, 2009, 02:33:58 PM
i'm so proud

also, don't expect him to keep this thread updated
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: reese125 on February 05, 2009, 02:37:53 PM
if you makes you feel proud Dio, youre the first person i thought about when I made this thread

now that I think of it..youre the first person I think about when i go to bed too....uh oh.
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Diomedes on February 05, 2009, 02:41:26 PM
Of course you did, of course you do.  I was right, and I'm hot as balls. 

Now if you ever want of piece of me, you'll assume responsibility for keeping this thread updated so that people like my sweetie pie SunMo can quickly find the info they need, all in one place.
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: reese125 on February 05, 2009, 02:45:05 PM
Dio, from reading all your posts all these years Ive realized a couple of things-you know how to read...you have a computer....and you look at sports sites

that being said...if you or anyone else see somebody get tagged before I do, please do keep Mo proud and place it in this thread..thanks
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Diomedes on February 05, 2009, 02:46:44 PM
Give me your password and I'll do what you ought to do...maintain a list in the opening post.
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: rjs246 on February 05, 2009, 02:47:29 PM
I'm going to start a new thread every time I see that someone else got tagged. Just a heads up.
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on February 05, 2009, 02:50:09 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on February 05, 2009, 02:47:29 PM
I'm going to start a new thread every time I see that someone else got tagged. Just a heads up.
everytime you do that, i'll play with my turkey bag
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 05, 2009, 02:50:44 PM
every time you do that, I will vomit
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: reese125 on February 05, 2009, 02:51:08 PM
funny you say that because if Dio was as organized as he says he is there would be a separate thread for each individual on the Eagles roster--for better reference and structure

Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Diomedes on February 05, 2009, 02:53:11 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on February 05, 2009, 02:47:29 PM
I'm going to start a new thread every time I see that someone else got tagged. Just a heads up.

w00t
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: reese125 on February 05, 2009, 02:54:50 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on February 05, 2009, 02:46:44 PM
Give me your password and I'll do what you ought to do...maintain a list in the opening post.

the password is gonorrhea..go for it
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Diomedes on February 05, 2009, 03:10:18 PM
liar
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: QB Eagles on February 05, 2009, 05:48:29 PM
Cassel tagged by the Patriots (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3887262)
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Diomedes on February 05, 2009, 06:48:18 PM
get crackin' boy
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 06, 2009, 07:25:15 AM
Too bad he can't spel.
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Diomedes on February 06, 2009, 07:43:32 AM
you make me so happy Reese
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: BigEd76 on February 13, 2009, 04:23:19 PM
Brandon Jacobs (http://www.giants.com/news/headlines/story.asp?story_id=35423)
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Diomedes on February 14, 2009, 08:11:49 AM
the Falcons had no one better to franchise than their punter?
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Eagaholic on February 15, 2009, 04:47:14 AM
I've seen speculation that the Lions will tag their place kicker and since Haynesworth can't be tagged, I don't think anyone other than Rob Bironas would be worth the Titans tagging.

All I can say is I'm glad the Eagles have Dorenbos locked up for the next several years so we don't have to worry about all the acrimony and training camp media circus that would inevitably ensue with him getting franchised.

Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: rjs246 on February 15, 2009, 06:41:53 AM
Eagaholic is working on the funny.
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Eagaholic on February 15, 2009, 05:31:13 PM
I think it needed more work
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Feva on February 16, 2009, 07:31:33 AM
It still does.
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: BigEd76 on February 16, 2009, 04:16:54 PM
Shayne Graham (http://www.bengals.com/news/news.asp?story_id=7503) (not TJ)
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: reese125 on February 17, 2009, 06:57:39 PM
Karlos Dansby with his 2nd franchise tag
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Eagaholic on February 17, 2009, 07:06:51 PM
probably because the Cardinals were too cheap to tag Warner (who I doubt will retire).
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Eagaholic on February 17, 2009, 10:42:37 PM
Not a done deal, but GM Ozzie Newsome says the Ravens will tag Suggs

http://www.profootballtalk.com/2009/02/17/ravens-will-tag-terrell/
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: reese125 on February 18, 2009, 05:44:25 PM
Suggs a done deal
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: reese125 on February 18, 2009, 05:45:56 PM
Antonio Bryant tagged as well
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Eagaholic on February 18, 2009, 06:07:24 PM
Sproles
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: BigEd76 on February 18, 2009, 09:50:44 PM
Oshiomogho Atogwe
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: General_Failure on February 18, 2009, 10:25:34 PM
Now you're just mashing on the keyboard.
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Eagaholic on February 18, 2009, 11:28:18 PM
nah, that's the guy who is going to make him rich with 39,000,000 dollars US from an overseas frozen account that they need help moving here. Ed is about to be a very rich man.
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: BigEd76 on February 19, 2009, 12:16:05 AM
awesome.  lemme get my routing info...
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: BigEd76 on February 19, 2009, 12:19:00 PM
Two more:  Bo Scaife and Dunta Robinson
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Eagaholic on February 19, 2009, 02:04:52 PM
Peppers tagged. I was totally stoked because it meant Gross would be coming free. Then I read the next paragraph that said Gross just worked out a new deal. shtein.
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: QB Eagles on February 19, 2009, 06:30:09 PM
Seahawks tag LB Leroy Hill.
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: BigEd76 on February 19, 2009, 08:03:34 PM
Steelers tag Max Starks
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: reese125 on February 19, 2009, 09:00:16 PM
The agent for Antonio Bryant says his client is upset with being franchise tagged and doesn't plan to sign the one-year, $9.884 million tender.

"He deserves security," the agent said. "He puts his body on the line. He thinks he deserves...not to play year-to-year like he did last year. They can put the franchise tag on him, but we don't have to sign it."

I think a couple of heads should do this. Sure you get paid a nice chunk of change, but the risk here is far greater than the reward-- getting hurt in one year and your shot at security is down the tubes. farg some of these teams not having the balls to dish out the loot for solid players. Its like a sit and wait to get hurt game for these execs. not having to pay a bigger guaranteed bonus
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Tomahawk on February 20, 2009, 11:08:38 AM
With NFL contracts not being guaranteed, does a multi-year deal really provide security?
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Eagaholic on February 20, 2009, 12:19:56 PM
The security stuff they talk about is just the unconditionally guaranteed money, and I think there is a fair amount of bullshtein around this driven by the agents because they only get paid out of the guaranteed amount.

Take the below example of Antonio Bryant. Once he signs off on his tag tender, his nearly $10 million is fully guaranteed. That is life security right there and about the same as the signing bonus he would get anyway on a 4 year contract.

Maybe he wants to see if he can get a jackpot payday somewhere else (and I don't really blame him) but I will bet it's also the agent in the player's ear. The agent wants to get another hundred grand, whether it's it helps the player that much more or not, so he will push for free agency.

Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: rjs246 on February 20, 2009, 12:26:38 PM
Call me crazy but I don't think Bryant is in a position to be making demands. He's had one good year after several non-existent years with lots of personal baggage in tow. He's got a guaranteed $9+mil with the franchise. Is he really going to get much more than that in guaranteed money on the open market?
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Eagaholic on February 20, 2009, 01:04:17 PM
Probably the Bucs are tagging him because  they want to see what he can do in back to back seasons before offering a big contract. Especially after seeing how their one and done phenom Michael Clayton is now history.
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: reese125 on February 20, 2009, 04:05:59 PM
this I agree with...but my point is more geared towards dudes that are tagged back to back seasons or players that have done well multiple seasons and get hit with the tag- the team fully knows what to expect.

the back to back tag is a bunch of shtein in the respect that if a player is that good to you can bet the "guaranteed" bonus will be much bigger on the open market than the tender they have to sign
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on February 21, 2009, 12:41:17 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on February 20, 2009, 12:26:38 PM
Call me crazy but I don't think Bryant is in a position to be making demands. He's had one good year after several non-existent years with lots of personal baggage in tow. He's got a guaranteed $9+mil with the franchise. Is he really going to get much more than that in guaranteed money on the open market?

Neither is Dunta Robinson who is crying about being lied to about not being tagged.

Dude blew his leg up two years ago and was not full strength last year and is bitching about being guaranteed about 10M a year.
Title: Re: Franchise Tagged in 2009
Post by: Father Demon on June 24, 2009, 09:23:15 PM
Quote from: Eagaholic on February 19, 2009, 02:04:52 PM
Peppers tagged. I was totally stoked because it meant Gross would be coming free. Then I read the next paragraph that said Gross just worked out a new deal. shtein.


QuoteJulius Peppers' stalemate with the Carolina Panthers is over, leaving the defensive end rich and the NFC South champions free from worrying about a holdout. Peppers signed his one-year, $16.7 million tender on Wednesday, five months after the four-time Pro Bowl selection first announced he wanted to play elsewhere next season.

Link (http://tiny.pl/38sd)