ConcreteBoard

Eagles => Eagles Talk => Topic started by: PhillyPhreak54 on September 28, 2008, 01:53:17 PM

Title: Buck
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on September 28, 2008, 01:53:17 PM
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/sports/20080928_His_focus_is_on_game_and_his_family.html

Good fluff piece on Buck in today's Inky.

His comeback is pretty amazing. Despite his knees being held together with bailing wire, duct tape and JB Weld he has carved a niche as one of the better backup RBs in the game.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on September 28, 2008, 02:44:37 PM
He's definitely one of my favorite Eagles, hard not to root for a guy like him. 
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: 4and26 on September 28, 2008, 07:14:20 PM
Seems quite grounded.....how can you not cheer for a guy that bleeds green like he does.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on September 28, 2008, 07:15:02 PM
great story, i hadn't heard about his brother. 
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: shorebird on September 28, 2008, 07:54:20 PM
Go Cbuck. We need him tonight, and I have no doubt he'll come through big time.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on September 28, 2008, 10:23:41 PM
JINX!
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: methdeez on September 29, 2008, 12:23:53 AM
I thought he played pretty damn well, all things considered.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: Magical_Retard on September 29, 2008, 12:36:12 AM
if reid only kept running the ball.

2-3 times buck seemed to carry a defender for a extra few yards.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: Feva on September 29, 2008, 07:32:23 AM
http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/eagles/20080929_Eagles_Notes___Injuries_deplete_Birds__offense.html (http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/eagles/20080929_Eagles_Notes___Injuries_deplete_Birds__offense.html)

QuoteClass act. Buckhalter shared the wealth after his 1-yard touchdown run in the second quarter. After lunging into the end zone, Buckhalter got up and handed the ball to center Jamaal Jackson, who celebrated with a spike.

It was a sentimental gesture for the center, who lost his brother, Kamar, in an automobile accident two weeks ago
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on March 18, 2009, 12:50:05 PM
http://www.philly.com/philly/hp/news_update/20090318_Alleged_drug_dealer_names_ex-Eagle_Buckhalter_as_client__prosecutor_says.html
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 18, 2009, 12:58:17 PM
AFPMBM
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: reese125 on March 18, 2009, 01:05:58 PM
how bout the writer trying to portray Bucks picture to the title of his story

I mean he could of chose any football pic of him in uniform, running through a defense, instead the writer picks a picture of him looking like eddie murphy strung out...cute
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: ice grillin you on March 18, 2009, 01:11:26 PM
wait...buck smokes weed?
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 18, 2009, 01:15:09 PM
Him and Darrell Crutchfield
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: reese125 on March 18, 2009, 01:15:34 PM
ha....dudes cruising with 115 viles of cheeb in a Toyota Echo....

Im sure he has motives there, but man I dont know if I could even swallow my pride as a drug dealer driving that car
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: mussa on March 18, 2009, 01:16:50 PM
pro sports athletes smoke pot, go figure.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: ice grillin you on March 18, 2009, 01:27:58 PM
is there anyone ever who hasnt smoked weed?
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: SunMo on March 18, 2009, 01:28:38 PM
ummmm, no.  it's illegal.  thanks.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: fansince61 on March 18, 2009, 01:32:57 PM
I wonder how many "glass vials" of pot will be in the evidence locker next week :-D
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: General_Failure on March 18, 2009, 02:13:37 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 18, 2009, 01:27:58 PM
is there anyone ever who hasnt smoked weed?

Besides me?

Quote from: fansince61 on March 18, 2009, 01:32:57 PM
I wonder how many "glass vials" of pot will be in the evidence locker next week :-D

The same number as were reported. Now, how many were actually in his car before they started counting is a different story.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: DH on March 18, 2009, 02:27:46 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 18, 2009, 01:15:09 PM
Him and Darrell Crutchfield

And Terrance Carroll.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 18, 2009, 02:44:59 PM
Now you're just showing off.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: DH on March 18, 2009, 03:24:50 PM
Nah, you did. I bet more people remembered Carroll than did Crutchfield.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: Feva on March 18, 2009, 04:09:40 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 18, 2009, 01:27:58 PM
is there anyone ever who hasnt smoked weed?

<-------------
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: ice grillin you on March 18, 2009, 04:32:53 PM
no way romo wasnt hittin that good cabo shtein with jess
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 18, 2009, 04:51:27 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 18, 2009, 04:32:53 PM
no way romo wasnt hittin that good cabo shtein with jess
Buttsecks?

honestly why does this guy rat out people when he got caught in that car?  Did he run a delivery service?
(http://i266.photobucket.com/albums/ii280/alexavachon/half_baked.jpg)
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: Geowhizzer on March 18, 2009, 06:54:23 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 18, 2009, 01:27:58 PM
is there anyone ever who hasnt smoked weed?

I haven't.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: Father Demon on March 18, 2009, 06:56:28 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 18, 2009, 01:27:58 PM
is there anyone ever who hasnt smoked weed?

{Raises hand.}
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 18, 2009, 07:10:18 PM
bunch of weirdos. 
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: rjs246 on March 18, 2009, 07:23:12 PM
For real.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: Munson on March 18, 2009, 07:39:50 PM
Quote from: Father Demon on March 18, 2009, 06:56:28 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 18, 2009, 01:27:58 PM
is there anyone ever who hasnt smoked weed?

{Raises hand.}
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: reese125 on March 18, 2009, 07:42:02 PM
people need to get involved
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 18, 2009, 10:03:27 PM
Shockingly, Buckhalter denies the allegations (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3994452).
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: Eagles_Legendz on March 18, 2009, 11:29:14 PM
You all suck.

Disappointed in the lot of you.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: ice grillin you on March 19, 2009, 08:15:42 AM
i think they are saying they dont smoke weed NOW....no chance theres normal people out there that havent EVER done it
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 19, 2009, 08:47:56 AM
I would have nothing to gain by telling this board whether or not I have done it, and neither would anyone else.

That said, there are plenty of "normal" people who haven't tried it.  There are also plenty of whack jobs that have tried it or do it a lot.  I'm just going to assume that you are once again being the king of hyperbole.

Regardless, it's not as if this board is filled with normal people.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: ice grillin you on March 19, 2009, 09:12:27 AM
just because youre not 'normal' doesnt mean youre a whack job
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 19, 2009, 09:30:03 AM
It's binary.  Sorry, whack job.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: Zanshin on March 19, 2009, 09:33:45 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 19, 2009, 08:15:42 AM
i think they are saying they dont smoke weed NOW....no chance theres normal people out there that haven't EVER done it

I haven't. Not because I think it's wrong...but because I have something of a problem with moderation. It's easier for me to not start than it is to stop.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: reese125 on March 19, 2009, 11:42:39 AM
I can see where you might be a little nervous Zan because all it would take is one game of you playing Madden blazed and you might get hooked so stay away
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: RezRob on March 19, 2009, 12:24:47 PM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on September 28, 2008, 07:15:02 PM
great story, i hadn't heard about his brother. 
"we were always told that having a hard head makes a soft behind. " That is a bad combo for a prison stay... Just sayin...
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: NC_Eagle on March 21, 2009, 07:54:15 AM
Quote from: Munson on March 18, 2009, 07:39:50 PM
Quote from: Father Demon on March 18, 2009, 06:56:28 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 18, 2009, 01:27:58 PM
is there anyone ever who hasnt smoked weed?

{Raises hand.}
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: Diomedes on March 21, 2009, 07:55:41 AM
Plenty of people have never smoked.  What's so shocking about that? 
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: ice grillin you on March 21, 2009, 09:06:48 AM
its shocking to me and i wasnt even ever a big smoker....i guess my world was just filled with druggies...ive just never met a single non female that never at least tried it

one thing i think we can all agree on here is that weve all smoked less than buck
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 21, 2009, 09:10:21 AM
People who drink a lot but won't try weed are funny
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 21, 2009, 03:47:27 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 21, 2009, 09:10:21 AM
People who drink a lot but won't try weed are funny

I'm not really following you.  One is legal and a lot cheaper.  Plus, I've heard that you can't truly appreciate the feeling of being high until you try it.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: mpmcgraw on March 21, 2009, 06:00:52 PM
In what world is alcohol cheaper than weed? You can get high for $10. 

and weed is about 100000x easier to get than alcohol up until your 21
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 21, 2009, 08:08:56 PM
Case of Miller Lite = $15
Enough weed to split 3-4 ways = more than $15
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: ice grillin you on March 21, 2009, 10:23:36 PM
Quote from: jihadist monk on March 21, 2009, 06:00:52 PM
In what world is alcohol cheaper than weed?

never had a 40 huh?
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: Diomedes on March 21, 2009, 10:30:41 PM
bang for buck weed wins
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: ice grillin you on March 21, 2009, 10:39:19 PM
not even close

3 40's of high gravity is like six bucks and will put most heads to bed
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on March 21, 2009, 10:43:59 PM
Most guys I know toyed with the stuff back in the teens, including myself. As somebody noted earlier, weed was ridiculously easy to get your hands on, and cheaper then as you usually had to pay someone off to get you booze, plus you could go out behind the house, smoke a bowl, and be back inside watching X-Files within minutes, and no hangover. Ah, memories.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: ice grillin you on March 21, 2009, 10:49:39 PM
you had to pay people to get you alcohol?

i thought that was only in the movies?
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on March 21, 2009, 10:55:10 PM
To get it with any regularity and in denominations larger that a few beers, or anything in a state store, yeah. I'm talking when I was 16-17. There was no way any of us was walking into the ABC and coming out with a fifth.

Title: Re: Buck
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 21, 2009, 10:57:17 PM
we used to pay the workers from the GM plant to buy us booze if we got shut down from buying it ourselves. 
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: ice grillin you on March 22, 2009, 12:13:19 PM
maybe because im an old man but when i was growing unless you were like 12 tryin to buy no beer stores even carded
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: MDS on March 22, 2009, 12:23:10 PM
honestly i think it all started at 9/11

little stuff like making sure 15 year olds didnt go see r rated movies began. pre 9/11 no one gave a shtein, but all of a sudden they had security guards outside of old school. that obviously translated to buying booze.

go usa.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: ice grillin you on March 22, 2009, 02:17:22 PM
dont talk about ff's country like that
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 22, 2009, 02:22:49 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on March 21, 2009, 10:30:41 PM
bang for buck weed wins

yup
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 22, 2009, 02:58:08 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 22, 2009, 02:17:22 PM
dont talk about ff's country like that

This land is your land...
This land is my land...
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: General_Failure on March 22, 2009, 06:22:37 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 22, 2009, 02:22:49 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on March 21, 2009, 10:30:41 PM
bang for buck weed wins

yup

Well that's great if you're making Buckhalter money, but what about Joe Sixpack?
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 22, 2009, 07:46:10 PM
If you're not a pothead or smoking schwag, a bowl will get you as good as a 6 pack will. Price wise they're similar.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: Diomedes on March 22, 2009, 09:18:24 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 22, 2009, 02:58:08 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 22, 2009, 02:17:22 PM
dont talk about ff's country like that

This land is your land...
This land is my land...

That's a liberal tune.  America the Beautiful is more your style.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: Diomedes on March 22, 2009, 09:18:55 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 22, 2009, 07:46:10 PM
If you're not a pothead or smoking schwag, a bowl will get you as good as a 6 pack will. Price wise they're similar.

not to mention a sixer does dick all for me unless I drink it awful fast
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: Munson on March 23, 2009, 03:10:49 AM
I've watched most of my friends smoke, giggle for about an hour, then eat and fall asleep.

I'd rather be drunk.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: DH on March 23, 2009, 10:07:50 AM
Quote from: Munson on March 23, 2009, 03:10:49 AM
I've watched most of my friends smoke, giggle for about an hour, then eat and fall asleep.

So??
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 23, 2009, 10:52:22 AM
Munson just made a great argument for smoking.

EDIT:  Two actually...
1.  It makes you happy and then you fall asleep.
2.  He doesn't.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: shorebird on March 23, 2009, 01:22:39 PM
Let's not forget, weed doesn't give you hangovers.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: DH on March 23, 2009, 01:34:05 PM
Quote from: PPinDC on March 21, 2009, 10:43:59 PM
.................and no hangover. Ah, memories.

We didnt. Maybe you need to lay off the pipe, hippie.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: Rome on March 23, 2009, 02:47:37 PM
Quote from: Die-Hard on March 23, 2009, 01:34:05 PM
We didnt. Maybe you need to lay off the pipe, hippie.

My irony meter just melted.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: DH on March 23, 2009, 03:34:26 PM
[Frank Costaza] What the hell is that supposed to mean? [/Frank Costanza]
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: Eagaholic on March 24, 2009, 09:40:15 AM
QuoteConvicted Drug Dealer Apologizes to Buckhalter
Posted by Mike Florio on March 24, 2009, 9:16 a.m. EDT

Styles Beckles, a drug dealer who was on trial last week in Philadelphia, has apologized in writing to former Eagles and current Broncos running back Correll Buckhalter for a written statement claiming that Buckhalter routinely bought high-end marijuana from Beckles.

The apology, released by Beckles' counsel and forwarded to PFT, states a follows:

"I want to apologize to Correll Buckhalter and [former Temple football player] Keita Crespina for any personal or professional embarrassment I may have caused them.  I [was] coerced and manipulated into making a statement implicating these two gentlemen as purchasers of marijuana.  The State Police wiretapped my phone, listened to every phone conversation I [had] in [D]ecember 2005 and January 2006 and twisted those conversations out of context to convince a judge I was a drug dealer.  Nothing could be furthe [sic] from the truth.

"I never sold marijuana to Correll Buckhakter.  The police listened to one conversation I had with Correll and decided it was about marijuana.  Its [sic] not the truth.   I have never sold, talked about selling or given marijuana or anything else illegal to Correll Buckhalter.

"I went to Temple University with Keita Crespina.  Again, the police listened to a lot of private phone converstaions [sic] I had with Keita, twisted the conversations into something tehy [sic] were not and used erroneous conclusions about those conversations to convince a judge I was a marijuana dealer.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  I have [not] sold or given anything illegal to Keita.

"I hope Correll and Keita will accpet [sic] my apology.  You do not deserve this.  My life has been a real life version of 'Enemy of the State' since my arrest on February 1, 2006.  And my life has been a real life version of 'Training Day' since I was rearrested on April 24, 2008."

Whether anyone believes Beckles remains to be seen.   A jury heard his version of the events last week, and opted not to find that reasonable doubt existed as to whether Beckles was a drug dealer.  And so the jury convicted him on two counts of possession of marijuana with intent to deliver.

Thus, it's also reasonable, in our opinion, to doubt Beckles' denial that he sold drugs to Buckhalter — and likewise to doubt Buckhalter's denial that he purchased pot from Beckles.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: General_Failure on March 24, 2009, 10:05:03 AM
I like the end of that. I enjoy being told so plainly what conclusions I can come to.
Title: Re: Buck
Post by: shorebird on March 26, 2009, 05:35:13 PM
Quote from: Die-Hard on March 23, 2009, 01:34:05 PM
Quote from: PPinDC on March 21, 2009, 10:43:59 PM
.................and no hangover. Ah, memories.

We didnt. Maybe you need to lay off the pipe, hippie.

No pipes for me, never liked keeping paraphernalia around. A friend one time showed me how to do up a blunt. I was always a cigar smoker, so that to me was the best of both worlds.

Did anyone mention that weed doesn't give you a hangover??