ConcreteBoard

Eagles => Eagles Talk => Topic started by: Seabiscuit36 on September 22, 2008, 10:28:57 AM

Title: The Defense
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on September 22, 2008, 10:28:57 AM
Its pretty obvious that last week was a shootout, they happen, both D's didnt show up.  The Eagles Total D is ranked 4th Overall in the league (http://"http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=2&defensiveStatisticCategory=GAME_STATS&conference=ALL&role=OPP&season=2008&seasonType=REG&d-447263-s=TOTAL_YARDS_GAME_AVG&d-447263-o=1&d-447263-n=1")The Eagles Total D is ranked 4th Overall in the league with Run D at 1st overall  (http://"http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?archive=false&conference=null&role=OPP&offensiveStatisticCategory=null&defensiveStatisticCategory=RUSHING&season=2008&seasonType=REG&tabSeq=2&qualified=true&Submit=Go").  The Run D has been better than i ever thought they would be capable of. Shutting down Jackson/Barber/Jones/Parker is a hell of a start allowing only 2.4yards per carry, and averaging 45.7

QuoteRk Team G Pts/G TotPts Scrm Plys Yds/G Yds/P 1st/G 3rd Md 3rd Att 3rd Pct 4th Md 4th Att 4th Pct Pen Pen Yds ToP/G FUM Lost
1 Baltimore Ravens  2  10 20  107  161.5  3.0  9.5  5  26  19  0  2  0  14  105  22:58  2  1 
2 Pittsburgh Steelers  3  12.7 38  181  234.0  3.9  17.7  16  39  41  0  1  0  22  170  30:27  2  2 
3 Tennessee Titans  3  9.7 29  183  240.3  3.9  14.0  11  42  26  5  9  56  13  95  29:49  6  1 
4 Philadelphia Eagles  3  16.7 50  159  242.0  4.6  14.0  8  34  24  0  1  0  26  209  27:06  5  3 
5 Buffalo Bills  3  16.3 49  174  247.3  4.3  15.0  7  39  18  2  3  67  13  85  27:40  4  2 
6 New York Giants  3  14.3 43  178  252.3  4.3  16.0  16  43  37  2  3  67  20  132  28:37  2  0 
7 New York Jets  2  16.5 33  123  268.5  4.4  18.0  9  27  33  2  3  67  6  69  30:17  3  0 
8 Minnesota Vikings  3  17.3 52  166  280.7  5.1  15.3  13  36  36  0  1  0  29  230  27:02  5  2 
9 Arizona Cardinals  3  15.7 47  166  283.3  5.1  17.0  11  31  36  2  2  100  16  129  28:02  6  4 
10 Dallas Cowboys  3  21 63  172  292.0  5.1  17.0  12  35  34  1  3  33  22  167  27:06  7  2 
10 San Francisco 49ers  3  22 66  198  292.0  4.4  18.0  15  42  36  3  4  75  23  176  30:28  5  1 
12 Carolina Panthers  3  20.3 61  180  292.3  4.9  15.3  14  39  36  1  3  33  23  198  30:10  4  3 
13 Washington taterskins  3  19 57  179  305.7  5.1  18.7  15  35  43  0  0  0  18  167  29:28  3  2 
14 Jacksonville Jaguars  3  19.3 58  160  306.3  5.7  17.0  14  33  42  1  2  50  15  113  26:06  2  1 
15 Atlanta Falcons  3  19.7 59  189  306.7  4.9  17.7  16  41  39  1  3  33  19  137  30:22  4  1 
16 Seattle Seahawks  3  26.7 80  180  314.3  5.2  15.7  14  42  33  1  2  50  17  125  30:16  4  2 
17 Miami Dolphins  3  21.3 64  174  318.0  5.5  17.0  16  41  39  3  4  75  17  95  30:07  6  2 
18 Chicago Bears  3  20 60  205  321.0  4.7  21.0  13  40  32  0  2  0  22  166  30:28  2  2 
19 Houston Texans  2  34.5 69  121  324.0  5.4  20.0  11  23  48  1  1  100  12  116  30:25  4  2 
20 New England Patriots  3  19.3 58  168  333.7  6.0  16.3  18  37  49  0  1  0  13  110  30:23  1  0 
21 Oakland Raiders  3  24.3 73  193  336.3  5.2  21.3  14  37  38  1  1  100  12  76  30:35  6  2 
22 Indianapolis Colts  3  22.3 67  194  340.3  5.3  19.3  20  43  46  0  1  0  14  109  35:18  3  1 
23 Cleveland Browns  3  22 66  180  347.0  5.8  21.7  14  34  41  4  6  67  23  182  35:00  2  0 
24 Cincinnati Bengals  3  22.3 67  206  353.0  5.1  20.3  18  42  43  0  3  0  20  129  33:58  4  3 
25 Kansas City Chiefs  3  26 78  177  357.0  6.1  17.3  19  40  48  1  1  100  16  113  30:50  7  5 
26 Tampa Bay Buccaneers  3  19 57  199  359.0  5.4  17.0  16  47  34  1  2  50  23  175  33:29  3  0 
27 Green Bay Packers  3  23.7 71  200  373.0  5.6  19.3  16  42  38  2  4  50  21  136  29:35  4  1 
28 New Orleans Saints  3  27.7 83  190  392.0  6.2  21.0  11  33  33  1  2  50  14  112  29:58  2  2 
29 Denver Broncos  3  28 84  185  421.7  6.8  20.3  16  36  44  3  5  60  22  207  29:39  6  2 
30 Detroit Lions  3  37.7 113  188  430.3  6.9  22.3  17  38  45  1  2  50  18  160  33:30  3  1 
31 San Diego Chargers  2  32.5 65  146  437.0  6.0  27.0  9  25  36  2  3  67  13  96  33:01  3  1 
32 St. Louis Rams  3  38.7 116  200  456.7  6.8  25.7  18  35  51  1  1  100  16  165  33:57  3  1 

Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: rjs246 on September 22, 2008, 10:38:58 AM
In my wildest dreams I never thought the defense would do what it did yesterday. I'm not 100% convinced yet, but that game was f'ing impressive.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: RezRob on September 22, 2008, 10:42:50 AM
If the Steelers O had a hard time imagine Kyle Orton & co. This week should be fun.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: NGM on September 22, 2008, 10:52:07 AM
While I do think that the Eagles defense is closer to what we saw yesterday as opposed to the Dallas game, Pittsburgh's O-Line is pretty bad. 

I read some stat somewhere (maybe ESPN) that the Steelers are allowing a sack every 5.5 snaps or something like that. 
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: ice grillin you on September 22, 2008, 10:55:41 AM
(http://www.philaflava.com/forum/images/smiles/icon_twrex_ROFLburger.gif) just went down again
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 22, 2008, 11:05:02 AM
Stewart Bradley is actually pretty good.  Gaither made a couple of great plays also, even if letting Ben off the hook on that one play was bad.

I don't recall seeing Gocong make a play, though.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: phattymatty on September 22, 2008, 11:06:46 AM
bradley looked like the best player on the field for a little while.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on September 22, 2008, 11:08:58 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 22, 2008, 10:55:41 AM
(http://www.philaflava.com/forum/images/smiles/icon_twrex_ROFLburger.gif) just went down again
lmao, it took me a few seconds to get that...doh
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: mussa on September 22, 2008, 11:10:24 AM
i think that the offense is sustaining longer drives also. they are running the ball...which keeps the D fresh. I am really impressed with the D, but it is still early in the season.

Wonder where we are ranked offensively?
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on September 22, 2008, 11:12:13 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on September 22, 2008, 11:05:02 AM
Stewart Bradley is actually pretty good.  Gaither made a couple of great plays also, even if letting Ben off the hook on that one play was bad.

I don't recall seeing Gocong make a play, though.
Gocong kept Miller quiet all day which was impressive.  The crazy part was how many sacks they missed or lost because of penalties, they could have had 13 sacks at my count
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on September 22, 2008, 11:17:29 AM
Quote from: mussa on September 22, 2008, 11:10:24 AM
i think that the offense is sustaining longer drives also. they are running the ball...which keeps the D fresh. I am really impressed with the D, but it is still early in the season.

Wonder where we are ranked offensively?
Total Offensive Ranking is 6th overall (http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=2&offensiveStatisticCategory=GAME_STATS&conference=ALL&role=TM&season=2008&seasonType=REG&d-447263-s=TOTAL_YARDS_GAME_AVG&d-447263-o=2&d-447263-n=1)  not bad
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: mussa on September 22, 2008, 11:20:07 AM
Not bad...thats a really good sign considering how slow they start some seasons :yay :yay
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: ice grillin you on September 22, 2008, 11:22:24 AM
the steelers completed eight more passes than sacks allowed...id say the pass rush held miller down more than anyone covering him...plus he was their top receiver and averaged 15 yards a catch...also if you watch how they run their defense they dont really require gocong to cover the te...among others i spotted samuel lito and even bradley a couple times covering miller....all you need to know about gocong is on a day when i think i even got a sack his stat line read one tackle


bradley is pretty good tho
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 22, 2008, 11:29:05 AM
Gocong's the one that comes out in nickel packages usually, right?

The Eagles probably play nickel at least 1/3 of the time.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: ice grillin you on September 22, 2008, 11:49:12 AM
correct

i actually just rewatched the game right now and lito covered miller a lot...i would imagine against power pro set offenses like pitt who dont run a ton of three and four wr sets the eagles will put a corner on the te
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 22, 2008, 11:59:28 AM
Good point.  It especially makes sense for teams like Dallas and Pittsburgh, where their TE is their 2nd or 3rd best receiver.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on September 22, 2008, 12:44:18 PM
The Heath Miller being their leading receiver is a little deceptive considering that he made two long catches on that last drive.  
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: methdeez on September 22, 2008, 01:31:23 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 22, 2008, 11:22:24 AM
all you need to know about gocong is on a day when i think i even got a sack his stat line read one tackle

Thier running backs were also not really getting to the LB level before being tackeled
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 22, 2008, 01:33:26 PM
I think the Gocong *hate* is unwarranted, but it's really hard to argue that he did a good job yesterday when he was basically the only starter that didn't make a play.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: The BIGSTUD on September 22, 2008, 03:59:58 PM
I was absolutely thrilled about what the D did yesterday, but I'm still concerned about the pass rush, when we don't blitz a lot. Juqua is inconsistent, and at times Cole is too.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: ice grillin you on September 22, 2008, 05:59:29 PM
this would not be the day to be concerned about the pass rush...and they dont have any players other than killa that can get their man one on one...altho darren howard looked reborn yesterday
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Diomedes on September 22, 2008, 06:01:49 PM
Quote from: King Cole on September 22, 2008, 03:59:58 PMI was absolutely thrilled about what the D did yesterday, but I'm still concerned about the pass rush, when we don't blitz a lot. Juqua is inconsistent, and at times Cole is too.

You on the other hand are consistently the most idiotic poster this board suffers, beating out even Munron on the regular.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Magical_Retard on September 22, 2008, 06:31:02 PM
its funny that when seemingly everyone was getting sacks....clemons still didnt get any.

what a terrible signing.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: methdeez on September 22, 2008, 06:54:52 PM
He is still in his training camp. And I don't expect him to last through the next one.
But, he was relatively cheap for a DE. It was a gamble on a cheap player at a ridic. expensive position. It looks like they lost, but they didn't lose much.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: ice grillin you on September 22, 2008, 07:28:04 PM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on September 22, 2008, 06:31:02 PM
its funny that when seemingly everyone was getting sacks....clemons still didnt get any.

what a terrible signing.

+1
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: shorebird on September 22, 2008, 07:42:12 PM
This D is shaping up real well, and besides the line and linebackers, the Eagles have one hell of a good group of Dbacks, besides that waste of space, Considine. Quintin Mikell is the shtein. Samuel has shown it doesn't matter what kind of scheme he plays in, he'll make big plays. And I don't care what anyone else thinks, if Sheldon Brown isn't better than Lito Shepard already, he will be. Shepard can't hold a candle to the way Brown hits or tackles.

Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Diomedes on September 22, 2008, 07:44:06 PM
Lito intercepts, Brown hits.  I view them as equally valuable corners, just different styles.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: shorebird on September 22, 2008, 07:45:20 PM
Equal in value only if Lito doesn't get hurt and miss a lot of time.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on September 22, 2008, 07:45:29 PM
While it was amazing yesterday, I'm not ready to pull my pud just yet. The Eagles are notorious for being inconsistent. Cynicism creeps in and I imagine Kyle Orton behind that poor OL staying clean.

Although I do think the run defense is worth being given props to. They have shut down good backs.

Hell, I kept thinking when it was 10-6 that they'd end up losing 13-10 on some late game bullshtein.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: MadMarchHare on September 22, 2008, 07:59:29 PM
You, me and everyone else.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Geowhizzer on September 22, 2008, 08:08:28 PM
Quote from: MadMarchHare on September 22, 2008, 07:59:29 PM
You, me and everyone else.

Yeah, pretty much.

Heck, if PHREAK was thinking that way, imagine what the rest of us were thinking.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Magical_Retard on September 22, 2008, 08:48:41 PM
well if you stop forte and force orton into 3rd and long....you can see a repeat performance or something close to it.

looking at the schedule till the bye week (chicago, dc, san fran) eagles should be 5-1. now thats assuming that they beat washington who shouldnt be a pushover but still a team the eagles should beat. they are not as strong as the giants or the cowboys and hopefully westbrook is back for that game.


even after the bye week they play falcons and seahawks. if the eagles can be consistent they should be in great shape.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: ice grillin you on September 22, 2008, 08:51:53 PM
even without westbrook id feel a lot more comfortable about sunday if it wasnt a primetime spot...that atmosphere is gonna be tough and coming out of there with a win will be impressive
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on September 24, 2008, 11:36:51 AM
I was Zanshin and wondering who got credit for all the sacks Sunday:
B. Dawkins 1.0
O. Gaither 1.5
T. Cole 1.0 
J. Parker 2.5
D. Howard 1.5
D. Klecko 0.5
B. Bunkley 1.0
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Zanshin on September 24, 2008, 11:53:51 AM
I'm bored, so I thought I'd critcize your word usage. 
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Feva on September 24, 2008, 12:29:18 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on September 24, 2008, 11:36:51 AM
I was board and wondering who got credit for all the sacks Sunday:
B. Dawkins 1.0 - 1 called back on penalty
O. Gaither 1.5 - somehow slipped off of ROFL
T. Cole 1.0 - 1 called back on penalty
J. Parker 2.5
D. Howard 1.5
D. Klecko 0.5
B. Bunkley 1.0

Off the top of my head.  Scary (or beautiful) part is that they left a few out on the field.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 24, 2008, 12:34:26 PM
Juqua!
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on September 24, 2008, 12:41:10 PM
Quote from: Zanshin on September 24, 2008, 11:53:51 AM
I'm bored, so I thought I'd critcize your word usage. 

noted
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: hbionic on September 24, 2008, 01:44:15 PM
It's just scary that Jaqua is anchoring the other side.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Zanshin on September 24, 2008, 01:47:36 PM
On the bright side, Jaqua Parker is better than that Jaqua Thomas stiff.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: General_Failure on September 24, 2008, 01:50:39 PM
Quote from: Zanshin on September 24, 2008, 01:47:36 PM
Jaqua Parker is better than Jaqua Thomas stiff.

:sly
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Zanshin on September 24, 2008, 01:53:35 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on September 24, 2008, 01:50:39 PM
Quote from: Zanshin on September 24, 2008, 01:47:36 PM
Jaqua Parker is better than Jaqua Thomas stiff.

:sly

Yeah, I said it.  Hard to rush the passer all stiff, obviously.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Tomahawk on September 24, 2008, 02:08:20 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 22, 2008, 08:51:53 PM
even without westbrook id feel a lot more comfortable about sunday if it wasnt a primetime spot...that atmosphere is gonna be tough and coming out of there with a win will be impressive

I don't know the exact record, but the Eagles have considerably more wins (3x?) as losses in primetime games. That in conjunction with the fact that I'll be at this game mean there's no way the Bears win.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: stalker on September 24, 2008, 03:14:17 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on September 22, 2008, 06:01:49 PM
Quote from: King Cole on September 22, 2008, 03:59:58 PMI was absolutely thrilled about what the D did yesterday, but I'm still concerned about the pass rush, when we don't blitz a lot. Juqua is inconsistent, and at times Cole is too.

You on the other hand are consistently the most idiotic poster this board suffers, beating out even Munron on the regular.
I am highly insulted.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: ice grillin you on September 24, 2008, 05:24:44 PM
Quote from: Tomahawk on September 24, 2008, 02:08:20 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 22, 2008, 08:51:53 PM
even without westbrook id feel a lot more comfortable about sunday if it wasnt a primetime spot...that atmosphere is gonna be tough and coming out of there with a win will be impressive

I don't know the exact record, but the Eagles have considerably more wins (3x?) as losses in primetime games. That in conjunction with the fact that I'll be at this game mean there's no way the Bears win.


new team new year...they are 0-1 this season...what they did in primetime in 2002 and 2003 is irrelevant...a win sunday in my book is an impressive win
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Phanatic on September 24, 2008, 05:46:44 PM
The Bears don't scare me at all. Their offense kind of looks suckish.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: ice grillin you on September 24, 2008, 05:50:45 PM
i dont think it would be the win of the century but they are a solid if not overly impressive team and beating them at night in soldier field would make me happier than most games on their schedule this year...thats all im saying
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: mussa on September 24, 2008, 05:53:37 PM
Bears got D, thats it. We're a better team on paper and we should win this game. I'm not too concerned
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Rome on September 24, 2008, 06:27:37 PM
We're the best.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: rjs246 on September 24, 2008, 06:43:40 PM
Agreed, but people say mean things about us.

US!
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: ice grillin you on September 24, 2008, 06:47:45 PM
Quote from: mussa on September 24, 2008, 05:53:37 PM
Bears got D, thats it. We're a better team on paper and we should win this game. I'm not too concerned


suicide....stat
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: hbionic on September 24, 2008, 06:57:19 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on September 24, 2008, 06:43:40 PM
Agreed, but people say mean things about us.

US!

I think its awesome that people say WE.

I think its freakin radical that people make fun of that.

Win-Win.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Rome on September 24, 2008, 07:00:41 PM
Saying or posting "We" is so farging retarded it's not even worthy of being mocked anymore.  It's actually worse than "owned" if that's possible.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 24, 2008, 07:01:20 PM
mussa just got owned.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Magical_Retard on September 24, 2008, 07:26:15 PM
actually the bears should scare the eagles.

they have a very solid defense...maybe the best they have faced so far all season. they just had a terrible loss.

eagles could possibly be looking ahead to the taterskins next weekend.

but i hope mcnabb back in chicago is some sort of a motivating factor to play lights out even without westbrook.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Rome on September 24, 2008, 07:28:12 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on September 24, 2008, 07:01:20 PM
mussa just got owned.

lollerskates?
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: reese125 on September 24, 2008, 07:37:59 PM
Im sorry...but when you give up 400 yards passing to Brian farging Griese and its the Tampa Bay Bucs, and you couldnt generate 1 sack..... your defense has more problems than you think

McNabb could have a field day...thats if Max-Jean can protect him
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: MadMarchHare on September 24, 2008, 09:46:21 PM
Chicago should be a much easier out than Pittsburgh, which is a much better team.  The Bears are really a one-trick pony on offense.  Orton isn't scaring anyone, and if they are routinely in 3rd and long, I like the Birds chances.

There D has been great, but certainly seems to be down this year compared to previous ones.

I have a hard time believing this will be a loss, even in Chicago (of course, I thought that last year too, and if they do lose I'll hear untold amounts of shtein from the locals).
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Magical_Retard on September 24, 2008, 10:31:48 PM
i get the feeling chicagos defense will show up certain games and disappears certain games.

hoping this isnt the game where they decide to show up.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: NC_Eagle on September 24, 2008, 10:56:07 PM
Quote from: Rome on September 24, 2008, 07:28:12 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on September 24, 2008, 07:01:20 PM
mussa just got owned.

lollerskates?

ROFLCOPTER
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: ice grillin you on September 25, 2008, 06:18:44 AM
Quote from: reese125 on September 24, 2008, 07:37:59 PM
Im sorry...but when you give up 400 yards passing to Brian farging Griese and its the Tampa Bay Bucs, and you couldnt generate 1 sack..... your defense has more problems than you think

McNabb could have a field day...thats if Max-Jean can protect him

he threw 67 times he better throw for 400 yards
he threw 30 incompletions
his avg per attempt was 6 yards
they had 17 yards rushing
67 passes and only 20 pts
more picks than td's


dont act like brian griese tore the bears up
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: QB Eagles on September 25, 2008, 06:31:59 AM
All Reid sees is that a team got a W throwing 67 times on the Bears.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: ice grillin you on September 25, 2008, 06:34:33 AM
for real hes gotta be salivating big time right now

tra and runyan better get in some extra squats this week
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 25, 2008, 08:18:03 AM
MJG better shoot up before this one.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: reese125 on September 25, 2008, 09:47:34 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 25, 2008, 06:18:44 AM
Quote from: reese125 on September 24, 2008, 07:37:59 PM
Im sorry...but when you give up 400 yards passing to Brian farging Griese and its the Tampa Bay Bucs, and you couldnt generate 1 sack..... your defense has more problems than you think

McNabb could have a field day...thats if Max-Jean can protect him

he threw 67 times he better throw for 400 yards
he threw 30 incompletions
his avg per attempt was 6 yards
they had 17 yards rushing
67 passes and only 20 pts
more picks than td's


dont act like brian griese tore the bears up

tell me a starter throws for 400..not a barely back-up qb..I dont care how many times he throws it

the bears are ranked 28th in the pass for a reason...and now face the most pass happy team in the NFL...good luck
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: rjs246 on September 25, 2008, 09:50:36 AM
This game gives me a heebeejeebees.

I don't really know what that means, I just wanted to say heebeejeebees.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 25, 2008, 10:05:30 AM
The Eagles let the Bears drive down the field at the end of the game to win, with the aforementioned Brian Griese at the helm, last time.  How could you not get the heebeejeebees when that is a relatively recent memory?
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Tomahawk on September 25, 2008, 11:26:22 AM
The Bears defense allowed TB to score 10 pts with about six minutes left in the game. Their defense is allowing 20 pts per game while the Steelers defense has only allowed 12.7 (Eagles are at 16.7). Also, the Bears only have 5 sacks on the season. When a QB drops back 67 times, you'd think a defense would accidentally get at least one sack.

Beyond that, the Eagles have stopped better backs than Forte, and Orton isn't going to beat anybody by himself.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on September 25, 2008, 12:17:32 PM
Look at the quality of opponent Tomahawk,  Texans and Browns  vs.  Indy and TB
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: ice grillin you on September 25, 2008, 03:22:25 PM
gotta love me predicting that the eagles will win and that i would consider it a quality win and all the homers coming out in force to say how much better the eagles are thah the bears and somehow spin it into me being nuts and thinking the eagles will lose

homers are special like that ed dood

Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Rome on September 25, 2008, 03:34:17 PM
The Cowboys game not withstanding, the Eagles defense is light years better than last year's group and Chicago's offense is putrid.

I'm not saying the Eagles are going to beat the daylights out of the Bears, but an easy victory wouldn't surprise me.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: henchmanUK on October 01, 2008, 02:09:46 PM
Our front seven is great, our secondary, Mikell excepted, blows this season. Man I hate saying that about Dawk.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: SunMo on October 01, 2008, 02:10:29 PM
Quote from: Rome on September 25, 2008, 03:34:17 PM
The Cowboys game not withstanding, the Eagles defense is light years better than last year's group and Chicago's offense is putrid.

I'm not saying the Eagles are going to beat the daylights out of the Bears, but an easy victory wouldn't surprise me.

ooops
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on October 02, 2008, 09:16:53 AM
QuoteEagles punter Sav Rocca will be named NFC Special Teams player of month tomorrow. Rocca led the NFL with a 44.1 net average in September, including punts of 65 yards (a career long), 64 and 61. He also placed seven of his 18 punts (39%) inside the 20-yard line. Rocca becomes the first Eagles punter to earn player of the month honors. Eagles K David Akers twice earned those honors in November 2000 and October 2007
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on October 02, 2008, 09:19:27 AM
He's been busier than he should be.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: shorebird on October 02, 2008, 02:24:39 PM
It's really something to see how far he has progressed since last year.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on October 10, 2008, 01:37:16 PM
Not sure if this was posted somewhere....but it's further proof how ludicrous this coaching staff and FO have become:

Quote
Abiamiri's return perfectly timed
Defense gets needed boost after Klecko's shift

By GEOFF MOSHER
The News Journal

PHILADELPHIA -- Suddenly, the most stable unit of Jim Johnson's defense is in flux.

Dan Klecko's abrupt move from defensive tackle to fullback on Wednesday left the Eagles short by one in their four-man rotation -- just in time for Victor Abiamiri to step in.

Abiamiri, a second-year pro who underwent wrist surgery at the end of July and only recently began to practice, took snaps at defensive tackle the past two days to replace Klecko in Johnson's tackle carousel.

Johnson said Abiamiri would probably play in small doses Sunday against the 49ers and mainly at defensive tackle in nickel situations, just enough snaps for Abiamiri to shake off the cobwebs and get a sniff of some action before they head into the bye week afterward.

Abiamiri's return made possible Klecko's move back to fullback, which allowed Tony Hunt's move back to halfback.

With Brian Westbrook's fractured ribs and Lorenzo Booker's slower-than-anticipated transition into the offense, the Eagles were suddenly thin at running back and needed Hunt in case Correll Buckhalter and Booker aren't enough.

"I think it [Abiamiri's return] is a big plus for us, and that's the reason we were able to do it," Johnson said.

Abiamiri will have to dig for playing time on a line that isn't accustomed to giving up much, especially the interior tandem of Mike Patterson and Brodrick Bunkley, the bullies most responsible for a run defense that until last Sunday's blip against the taterskins had ranked No. 1 against the run.

The strongest teams always have great depth, and the Eagles had been able to sustain success by plugging in Klecko and rookie Trevor Laws when Bunkley and Patterson needed a break.

Klecko had excelled in the team's nickel defense, his two sacks already a personal best and one less than his career total.

Laws, a rookie asked to learn a complex scheme, has impressed Johnson enough to warrant more snaps in the rotation.

"He's going to play some more," Johnson said of Laws. "More and more every week it seems like he's getting better."

Laws, the team's top overall draft pick in April, has averaged about 10-15 snaps per game.

"I think I've been definitely playing better, hopefully getting better each week," the dreadlocked Laws said.

"I think that probably helped them [the coaches] know they can feel a little better putting me in there, knowing I can get the job done."

Laws and Abiamiri were once roommates at Notre Dame and played alongside each other on the Irish defensive line, with Laws at left tackle and Abiamiri at left end.

Both were considered standout run stoppers. But in their final game together, the 2006 Fiesta Bowl, Ohio State rolled up 617 yards of total offense, 275 on the ground, to humble the Irish 34-20.

"That was a rough one," Laws said.

Abiamiri barely played last season, when the Eagles drafted him with their second pick in the second round, 37th overall, but he practiced at both tackle and end.

After impressing the coaches during his offseason workouts, he entered training camp as the front-runner to start at left end until he dislocated his right wrist on the first day of contact practice and underwent surgery.

While he's been sidelined, Juqua Parker re-emerged at left end. Parker leads the team 3.5 sacks, making it tough for Abiamiri to reclaim the starting job he never officially had won.

"It's definitely part of the deal," Abiamiri said. "If guys are playing well, that's good. It helps our team out and that's good.

"It'll be even better for us across the board with a little more depth and [we can] have more guys with fresh legs in there. It'll help us down the stretch."

Abiamiri practiced mostly with the scout team at defensive end last and practiced at both end and tackle positions this week.

He still wears a hard cast around his hand and wrist, but his fingers are uncovered and he said he's not limited by the padding.

As for playing the tackle position for the first time, well, he's eager to see what happens.

"It's kind of a trial-and-error kind of thing," he said. "I'll see what I can handle, and what I can't."


So a guy who was a tailback and couldn't hack it that got moved to fullback and couldn't hack it gets moved back to tailback, replaced by a guy who was a rotational defensive tackle, who in turn gets replaced by a guy who was a defensive end his entire college career and was drafted as one. He'll be awesome at tackle. About as good as Klecko will be as the starting Fullback, or Hunt as a halfback.

farging. Retarded.

And I love the "trial and error" quote. Yeah, that goes well with "pedal to the metal" and "we feel we are a championship caliber team".
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: QB Eagles on October 10, 2008, 01:40:05 PM
As long as they're testing out ridiculous shtein, how about trying Rocca at long field goals?
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: ice grillin you on October 10, 2008, 01:49:17 PM
its at the stage now where you flip flop btwn being infuriated and just laughing out loud at the ridiculousness of it all...i hope i get to the point real soon where i dont get mad at this shtein anymore...maybe that will be in the next few weeks when the flyers and sixers are both under way
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on October 10, 2008, 02:28:55 PM
amazing, but expected
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Magical_Retard on October 10, 2008, 02:41:10 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on October 10, 2008, 01:49:17 PM
its at the stage now where you flip flop btwn being infuriated and just laughing out loud at the ridiculousness of it all...i hope i get to the point real soon where i dont get mad at this shtein anymore...maybe that will be in the next few weeks when the flyers and sixers are both under way

i say that every yr and it never happens.

Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: shorebird on October 10, 2008, 03:58:11 PM
What NFL team that thinks it's an actual championship calibur team operates like this?? Trial and error in the middle of a two game losing streak??

Brilliant!!
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Feva on October 10, 2008, 09:13:45 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on October 10, 2008, 01:49:17 PM
its at the stage now where you flip flop btwn being infuriated and just laughing out loud at the ridiculousness of it all...i hope i get to the point real soon where i dont get mad at this shtein anymore...maybe that will be in the next few weeks when the flyers and sixers are both under way

I try to get there... and here and there, I can.  But I can barely watch what this fat motherfarger has done with my team over the last few years.

Sometimes you just gotta admit a guy sucks and that means you need to get his ass off the team... not try to make his ass fit somewhere else.  All this RB at FB at DT at DE at LB shtein is just farging embarassing.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on October 10, 2008, 09:16:11 PM
But Bill Belichick and Tony Dungy do it!
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: ice grillin you on October 11, 2008, 11:09:20 AM
Quote from: EagleFeva on October 10, 2008, 09:13:45 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on October 10, 2008, 01:49:17 PM
its at the stage now where you flip flop btwn being infuriated and just laughing out loud at the ridiculousness of it all...i hope i get to the point real soon where i dont get mad at this shtein anymore...maybe that will be in the next few weeks when the flyers and sixers are both under way

I try to get there... and here and there, I can.  But I can barely watch what this fat motherfarger has done with my team over the last few years.

Sometimes you just gotta admit a guy sucks and that means you need to get his ass off the team... not try to make his ass fit somewhere else.  All this RB at FB at DT at DE at LB shtein is just farging embarassing.


it really is

the problem again goes back to accountability...of which there is none....you can experiment and mess around with your roster like youre coaching a fantasy team and you can make accoutants player personell people when you know there will be no repercussions...thats just how it is and thats the part that makes me wanna give up...the part where you get pissed off to no end is the audacious and crass attitude these people have towards the whole world...from the refusal to acknowledge the history of the team to hoagiegate to the gold standard to ripping the fans to say nothing pressers to not even having pressers...to blackballing players...and on and on and on...the way they treat a fanbase that is arguably the best in all of pro sports is one of the worst things ive ever seen....its one thing to be incompetant or just not care like a norman bramen and if they were just clueless it would almost be better than to be arrogant how they are
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 09, 2009, 08:26:08 AM
link (http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/eagles/20090109_Paul_Domowitch__How_Eagles_started_tying_up_loose_tight_ends.html)

QuotePaul Domowitch: How Eagles started tying up loose tight ends


By Paul Domowitch
Philadelphia Daily News
Daily News Sports Columnist

THE EAGLES' defense is doing a lot of things exceptionally well these days.

They're keeping people out of the end zone (three touchdowns in the last four games). They're snuffing the run (3.3 yards allowed per carry in the last eight games). They are forcing turnovers (13 in the last six games). They are frustrating the hell out of opposing quarterbacks (.491 completion percentage and 5.38 yards allowed per attempt in the last seven games).

They also have taken the opposing tight end out of play, which wasn't the case earlier this season.

In the first nine games, opposing tight ends feasted on the Eagles like Yogi Bear going after a pic-a-nic basket, catching 47 passes and averaging a hefty 13.6 yards per catch.

"I never used to worry that much about tight ends," defensive coordinator Jim Johnson said. "But when they started getting big yards and making plays down in the red zone, that's when you pay more attention to it."

Johnson did more than pay attention to it. He made a couple of fairly significant changes to rectify the situation. The first was giving strong safety Quintin Mikell primary responsibility for covering the tight end on first and second downs.

The second was benching weakside linebacker Omar Gaither after the Eagles' Week 11 tie with Cincinnati and replacing him with the more athletic Akeem Jordan, who generally is matched up against the tight end on passing downs.

Like just about every other move Johnson has made this season, these have paid big dividends. In the last eight games, opposing tight ends have caught just 28 passes and averaged only 8.2 yards per catch.

The starting tight ends for the other three teams in the NFC East - the Cowboys' Jason Witten, the taterskins' Chris Cooley and the Giants' Kevin Boss - combined for 21 receptions, two TDs and a 13.7 yards-per-catch average the first time around against the Eagles. The second time around, the Eagles held them to 12, zero and 6.8.

"Sometimes, you just get into matchups you don't want," Johnson said. "We've been more careful in our matchups. I've used Quintin and Akeem. One of the main reasons I brought Akeem in [as a starter] was to match up with the tight end.

"People say, 'Well, what about Omar?' Omar did a good job. I just felt that Akeem was ready to play. I thought he could do a good job with the run defense, which he has. And I liked his matchup [against the tight end]."

In last week's 26-14, wild-card win over the Vikings, the Eagles held tight end Visanthe Shiancoe, who had three TDs and averaged 14.9 yards per catch in the previous four games, to one catch for 7 yards. The week before that, they held Witten, who caught seven passes for 110 yards against them in Week 2, to 7.1 yards per catch.

"Witten's a hard guy to match up with," Johnson said of the Cowboys' wide-bodied, 6-5, 262-pound tight end. "Quintin is about the only guy who can match up with him."

Boss caught six passes for 69 yards and a touchdown in the Giants' 36-31 win over the Eagles in Week 10. In the Week 14 rematch won by the Eagles, 20-14, he was held to one catch for 5 yards. Johnson is confident that Mikell and Jordan will be able to keep him in check.

"[Boss] has had a good year," Johnson said. "He's not [Jeremy] Shockey as far as down-the-field speed. But he's a good tight end. Quintin has good athletic ability. He has a little bit of that corner ability. For a safety, he's got very good closing quickness. He's got pretty good speed. He's a very competitive guy. A tough guy."


Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: shorebird on January 11, 2009, 07:45:27 PM
The D was great today, they made some clutch plays.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 11, 2009, 07:55:53 PM
Better than the Ravens D right now.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 11, 2009, 07:56:35 PM
Very important that Mikell wasn't seriously hurt.

Considine made the one good play in his stead, but was lucky interference or illegal contact was not called.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Feva on January 12, 2009, 05:53:21 PM
The last 6 weeks, the defense has given up 4 TD's, scored 4TD's... forced 13 turnovers, 10 sacks and is giving up an average of 10.8 ppg.

Lights. Out.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 12, 2009, 05:57:19 PM
Best defense in the league right now. Just stop dropping so many damn INTs.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 13, 2009, 09:31:16 AM
Quote from: King Cole on January 12, 2009, 05:57:19 PM
Best defense in the league right now. Just stop dropping so many damn INTs.
not that they are playing bad, but to say they are better than the Steelers or Ravens is crazy
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: reese125 on January 13, 2009, 09:43:54 AM
I dont care if the names on paper look mediocre up front or how they played previously, to say its crazy they arent the best defense right now is very debatable
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: ice grillin you on January 13, 2009, 09:50:32 AM
crazy might be a strong word but its not close...the ravens and steelers are on another level as far as defenses and just have massive playmakers all over the field

eagles defense is not intimidating anyone and other than samuel and to a certain extent killa have no one you have to worry about...that being said they are def the best in the nfc and have been playing tremendous...they just arent balt or pitt and theres no shame in that
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: reese125 on January 13, 2009, 10:15:13 AM
wait youre disagreeing with me? cant be

again youre taking Ed Reed, Suggs, Lewis and maybe Ngata and putting them on a pedestal for some reason. That defensive front gets less pressure than the Eagles (except for the playoffs so far) and the Eagles blew them out in sacks this year

there is no reason you cant compare Suggs to Cole and Ngata to Patterson or Bunkley. That leaves the other 2 players who I can say have an advantage over the Eagles players. You yourself said the Ravens corners suck so Im guess Im just trying to figure out how the "not even close" comparison comes in

Pittsburgh--has the advantage over the Eagles

once again youre not giving the Eagles defense credit as usual
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Diomedes on January 13, 2009, 10:24:25 AM
I would like to have some of your drugs, please.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: reese125 on January 13, 2009, 10:25:26 AM
I know times are tough on your end--hit me up Ill take care of ya
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Feva on January 14, 2009, 08:37:47 AM
The Steelers have a suffocating, dominant, intimidating defense who beat you up as the game goes on.

The Ravens have a suffocating, dominant, intimidating defense who beat you up and score on you as the game goes on.

The Eagles aren't a dominating unit, but they've developed an opportunistic uncanny timing for big plays... along with a killer instinct in the 4th quarter.



I don't put the Eagles D up there with the other two... but I'm pretty damn happy with it right now.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Tomahawk on January 14, 2009, 10:31:49 AM
The Cardinals defense has allowed the fewest yards in the playoffs. The experts say this is a big deal.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: ice grillin you on January 14, 2009, 10:35:59 AM
matt ryan (rookie)
tavaris jackson (warm urine)
jake delhomme (lol)
eli manning (23 mph wind)


i would say that neither of these teams have come close to what we might call a scary qb....this week they both do....the cards defense will be exposed the eagles will not
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 14, 2009, 05:22:59 PM
I'll take the Eagles defense over Baltimore and Pitt's in a second right now. You can throw on Pitt as their secondary isn't that good, and the Titans showed you can move the ball on Baltimore all day. Yes they have more playmakers, but their defense isn't as stingy. Especially up front.

If the Steelers aren't getting to the QB then their defense is done. They rely solely on their LBs getting pressure. Their secondary doesn't scare anyone. The Ravens fly to the ball, but they don't get pressure on the QB. If a good QB has time back there they can move the ball.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: shorebird on January 14, 2009, 05:57:43 PM
The Titans moved the ball on the Ravens, but when it counted most, the Ravens forced the crucial turnover. They make teams who don't turn the ball over, turn in over. Thats their thing. If it's not an Ed Reed int. it's a Suggs or Lewis hit that makes a player fumble. Also, not only do the Ravens make teams turn it over, they score on those turnovers.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: AP on January 15, 2009, 11:30:51 AM
I would want to play Pittsburgh in the SB if the Birds get past this next game. They have fits against 3-4's, but it's taking the less of 2 evils.  Philly's record vs Browns/Ravens isn't very good.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: ice grillin you on January 15, 2009, 12:05:33 PM
yeah because those many all important matchups with the browns in the early 90's have a huge bearing on the superbowl this year
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 15, 2009, 03:40:25 PM
I know he would be in the Superbowl, but I would rather face a rookie QB in the Superbowl than Ben and company.

The Ravens offense did not exactlty light the Eagles up until Kolb came in and gave them some points. In fact the points they scored in the first half were also thanks to McNabb.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Eagles_Legendz on January 15, 2009, 03:42:03 PM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on January 15, 2009, 03:40:25 PM
I know he would be in the Superbowl, but I would rather face a rookie QB in the Superbowl than Ben and company.

The Ravens offense did not exactlty light the Eagles up until Kolb came in and gave them some points. In fact the points they scored in the first half were also thanks to McNabb.

+1

Ravens offense doesn't score points against the Eagles D, especially this version, unless the O contributes points to Balt.
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: phattymatty on January 15, 2009, 03:46:13 PM
If the Eagles play bad against the Ravens in the first half of the Superbowl, does Donovan get benched?  I say yes. 
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Don Ho on January 15, 2009, 03:54:21 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 15, 2009, 12:05:33 PM
yeah because those many all important matchups with the browns in the early 90's have a huge bearing on the superbowl this year

yeah, that fricken 1979 matchup at The Vet still hovers over the complex.  Brian Sipe :boom
Title: Re: The Defense
Post by: Diomedes on September 14, 2009, 01:20:45 PM
ha