Following IGY's lead from last week, post your current record for the year and your prediction for the score this week against the Gints. But I'm modifying it a little -- use your score to determine how you do against the spread.
Eagles are -3 against the Giants.
Father Demon: 1-2 (straight up); 1-2 (ATS)
Eagles: 21
Giants: 20
JINX!
way to early
prediction threads and for that matter predictions should never be made before friday
that is when ill return for my much anticipated score
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 26, 2007, 01:58:14 PM
JINX!
way to early
prediction threads and for that matter predictions should never be made before friday
that is when ill return for my much anticipated score
You can at least say that you are 1-2 on the season, as I am also.
2-1 son
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 26, 2007, 02:15:34 PM
2-1 son
You picked the Eagles to beat Green Bay, lose to Washington, and lose to Detroit. 1-2.
i picked them to beat detroit
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 26, 2007, 02:25:58 PM
i picked them to beat detroit
Ha! (Good job.)
I'm picking them to beat the Giants. Score will be determined closer to kickoff.
Eagles 10
Giants 10
My record? 10.
28 24 Birds
Eli gets sacked 4 times.
what if westbrook doesnt play?
what if lito does?
how about dawkins?
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 26, 2007, 03:30:06 PM
what if westbrook doesnt play?
what if lito does?
how about dawkins?
Yes.
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 26, 2007, 03:30:06 PM
what if westbrook doesnt play?
what if lito does?
how about dawkins?
Eagles *should* win either way. It's just a matter of by how much.
Nothing's a given with the erratic play of McNabb. He has proven he can win and lose games in improbable fashion. Which McNabb shows up Sunday night? I've no effing idea.
Oh please.
It all depends on the farging playcalling.
If Reidingwheg runs the ball with consistency, they'll win the game. Period.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 26, 2007, 04:48:57 PM
Reidingwheg
This is mildly amusing, but trying to put ALL the blame on the playcalling and none of it on McNabb is just lame. He played like absolute crap in the Washington game.
Basically, despite the playcalling, this team would be 3-0 if..
- someone could have caught a punt against Green Bay
- McNabb could have hit the broad side of a barn against Washington
Don't delude yourself otherwise.
knee brace...it was filled with evil, and inaccuracy
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 26, 2007, 04:48:57 PM
Oh please.
It all depends on the farging playcalling.
If Reidingwheg runs the ball with consistency, they'll win the game. Period.
Quote from: FastFreddie on September 26, 2007, 04:55:20 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 26, 2007, 04:48:57 PM
Reidingwheg
This is mildly amusing, but trying to put ALL the blame on the playcalling and none of it on McNabb is just lame. He played like absolute crap in the Washington game.
Basically, despite the playcalling, this team would be 3-0 if..
- someone could have caught a punt against Green Bay
- McNabb could have hit the broad side of a barn against Washington
Don't delude yourself otherwise.
Thing is, if the game plan for Washington had an even run/pass ratio, the way Bwest was playing that game they might have won in spite of McNabb. Bwest was on a pace to run for 190+ yds. at halftime.
McNabb will benefit from this type of gameplan, is more effective, and it's perfectly obvious to everyone watching this team except Andy Reid. Without it, we have no chance so I'd say my first question is what the farg kind of gameplan we'll we see??
Eagles 36
Giants 21
No idea why but when I think of this game this is the score that comes to mind. And it has nothing to do with last weeks score.
I'm 0 and 3 so I quit!
some people will never understand the importance of calling the right plays and taking advantage of the players you have. until then they continue to blame mcnabb for everything. ha
eagles 27 giants 20
Quote from: FastFreddie on September 26, 2007, 04:55:20 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 26, 2007, 04:48:57 PM
Reidingwheg
This is mildly amusing, but trying to put ALL the blame on the playcalling and none of it on McNabb is just lame. He played like absolute crap in the Washington game.
Basically, despite the playcalling, this team would be 3-0 if..
- someone could have caught a punt against Green Bay
- McNabb could have hit the broad side of a barn against Washington
Don't delude yourself otherwise.
McNabb played poorly in the first two games, but got NO help from the coaches with a running game. Additionally, GB would have scored maybe 3 points if not for the coaching staff leaving the team with no punt returner.
Those losses are entirely on Koti-I mean, Reid.
Green Bay won the first game without scoring a offensive TD. Thats a game we should have won if Reid had a return man who could simply feild a punt. When I saw the way this team was totally unprepared to return a punt, it made me think that I was wrong assuming Reid could shut out all the hoopla surrounding his drug addict kids. What coach who is supposed to be as good as Reid starts the season with a return game that preforms like it did!?!? Totally cost us that game.
McNabb sucked major dog nut in the Washington game, but a 18/46 rush/pass ratio didn't help. It was plain too see McNabb didn't have it, and yet still, Reid called almost nothing but pass plays. It's just unbelievable a coach can call a game like that and still have a job. The Hardheaded bitch! Cbuck got the ball only one time in that game. Unacceptable. I swear, to get beat at home like that against the taterskins was heartbreaking and embarrassing.
Last game we ran the ball and good things happened. They split the carries between Bwest and Cbuck/Hunt/Tapeh. This week we might see more of Cbuck and Hunt. I like Hunt and wouldn't mind seeing him get the ball more.
going into a giants eagles game i always think we should beat them by a lot but it always ends up being a close game.
you would think by now defensive guru would have figured out burress by now but he always gives us problems and he is playing pretty damn well right now. with the possibility of no lito and no dawkins again i do not like our chanches. our offense will not spark it up like that again even though the giants D is not any better than the detroit lions defense.
with that said of course i think we win but it will be a lot closer than it should be.
eagles: 21
giants 17
pressure on eli is the key to this game...hopefully the d line is in a groove now...not sure they are as good as they showed last week but i think they are good enough to force a fumble or an interception or both
tough to make a prediction here without knowing how hurt westbrook is...i still have serious questions as to whether he will play or not...plax being a ? also throws this week into an almost impossible call
eagles could go into the 30's with a healthy westbrook or in the teens if he doesnt play...so ill go in the middle somewhere and say 27-24 birds
week 1 - eagles - loss
week 2 - skins - win
week 3 - eagles - win
week 4 - eagles - ??
i will say 31-24 Eagles
week 1 - eagles, loss
week 2 - eagles, loss
week 3 - lions, loss
0-3
I'm going to go ahead and assume that both Westbrook and Burress will play. With that I'll say:
Eagles 27
Giants 16
Week 1 - Eagles - Loss
Week 2 - Eagles - Loss
Week 3 - Eagles - Win
Week 4 - Eagles - ??
I've picked the Eagles every week so far, so I'm 1-2
With the way McNabb played last week, I can't pick against them.
Close game - Eagles 23, Giants 20
Quote from: SunMo on September 28, 2007, 11:44:45 AM
i will say 31-24 Eagles
week 1 - eagles, loss
week 2 - eagles, loss
week 3 - lions, loss
0-3
It looks like picking against SunMo is a slam dunk.
I'll reverse what I previously said about the Eagles winning. McNabb comes one more like games 1-2 than game 3. Plaxico plays. Lito and Westbrook don't play.
Giants 31
Eagles 23
week 1 - Eagles
week 2 - Eagles
week 3 - Eagles
1-2 record
Eagles 31
Giants 21
Gmen 17
Eagles 31
Eagles 17 Giants 24 :-\ :-\
Westy out, not having a good feeling about this matchup.
because my care factor for this season is so low i forgot to check on this....but BIG ups to seabiscuit the only person on the board to get this game right
eagles
father demon
ff
yeti
igy
sd
mussa
magical retard
sun
feva
cervent
phreak
4th and 26
nyg
seabiscuit
FF got it right as well
i stand corrected...i only read his original prediction where he picked the eagles...
sb no longer gets BIG ups
I basically changed my prediction because early in the week, I thought Westbrook would play... once I found out he probably wasn't going to, I smelled disaster.
What's worse is Westbrook wasn't missed nearly as much as Tralliam.
2-2.