ConcreteBoard

Football => The Rest of the NFL => Topic started by: QB Eagles on September 11, 2007, 12:32:51 AM

Title: Captains
Post by: QB Eagles on September 11, 2007, 12:32:51 AM
Anyone else think that the sudden NFL interest in captaincy is kinda silly? This isn't hockey; a large coaching staff dictates virtually all of the strategy of the game, and is in constant communication with the players on the field. The traditional sports role of captain really doesn't exist. I guess you could just call it an honorary title for locker room leaders, but do teams really need that locker room politics officially recognized by the team to figure out who their leaders are? Plus, the captains' uniforms have that big obnoxious "C" on them.

And what happens when one of these captains winds up getting arrested? You can already see the stories about "C"s being taken away in disgrace.

As far as I can tell, the Eagles are not taking part in the initiative. Good. The 49ers did even better and named 10 captains. The NFL refused to allow all those "C"s on the field. Mike Nolan seems to like finding little ways to stick it to the man.

What's the whole point here? Is the NFL going to start selling those "C" patches on uniforms for $100 extra or something?
Title: Re: Captains
Post by: hbionic on September 11, 2007, 03:50:08 AM
I'm just waiting for the team sargees to be named.
Title: Re: Captains
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on September 11, 2007, 08:18:06 AM
I really think the patch looks like a CFL patch.  Its kind of pathetic at this point to introduce that. 
Title: Re: Captains
Post by: Eagles 3x on September 11, 2007, 10:28:49 AM
As distasteful as it is to me, I  gotta tip my hat to the giants team. They voted gap tooth a captain. Thats quite a statement. They basicly flipped the bird to the front office and coaching staff.
Title: Re: Captains
Post by: Sgt PSN on September 11, 2007, 10:36:51 AM
And the QB. 
Title: Re: Captains
Post by: Magical_Retard on September 11, 2007, 10:52:23 AM
i do not get the explanation either. it was mentioned that it was done to better identify for the younger players who the team leaders were and who to go to in times of need or advice. wtf? why do they treat these players like they are babies just coming out of the womb? you have to dumb as bricks to not know who the team leaders are and who your supposed to go to or can go to in times of need. the big C patch solves that? maybe all chris henry needed was to see that on palmer.
Title: Re: Captains
Post by: MDS on September 11, 2007, 11:00:28 AM
Neil Rackers is a captain. He's a farging kicker.
Title: Re: Captains
Post by: Cerevant on September 12, 2007, 09:27:48 AM
Isn't there some rule in the NHL that only the Captain or Alternate can speak to the officials?  If that were the case in the NFL, then I'd wouldn't have a problem with it.  Since it isn't, that makes it a stupid marketing ploy for people to buy new versions of the jerseys they already have.
Title: Re: Captains
Post by: Sgt PSN on September 12, 2007, 09:33:22 AM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on September 11, 2007, 08:18:06 AM
I really think the patch looks like a CFL patch.  Its kind of pathetic at this point to introduce that. 

Couldn't agree more.   
Title: Re: Captains
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on September 12, 2007, 10:03:49 AM
Quote from: Cerevant on September 12, 2007, 09:27:48 AM
Isn't there some rule in the NHL that only the Captain or Alternate can speak to the officials?  If that were the case in the NFL, then I'd wouldn't have a problem with it.  Since it isn't, that makes it a stupid marketing ploy for people to buy new versions of the jerseys they already have.
You live in canada and don't know exactly how the Captain and Alternate system works?  ;)
Title: Re: Captains
Post by: Cerevant on September 12, 2007, 10:18:25 AM
Well, I haven't applied for Citizenship yet, so I haven't had to take that test.

The depressing part is that my 2 year old is more interested in hockey than football.  Must be something in the water - but I did get my first "go Eagles" out of him on Sunday.
Title: Re: Captains
Post by: Sgt PSN on September 12, 2007, 10:29:02 AM
Quote from: Cerevant on September 12, 2007, 10:18:25 AM
The depressing part is that my 2 year old is more interested in hockey than football. 

The only logical solution is to feed him to the wolves and make another.  Just try not to farg up next time.  ;)
Title: Re: Captains
Post by: Cerevant on September 12, 2007, 10:32:35 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on September 12, 2007, 10:29:02 AM
Quote from: Cerevant on September 12, 2007, 10:18:25 AM
The depressing part is that my 2 year old is more interested in hockey than football.

The only logical solution is to feed him to the wolves and make another.  Just try not to farg up next time.  ;)
Oh, so I should have been on top?
Title: Re: Captains
Post by: MadMarchHare on September 13, 2007, 10:20:45 PM
Quote from: MDS on September 11, 2007, 11:00:28 AM
Neil Rackers is a captain. He's a farging kicker.

He's also arguably the most effective player on their team.
Title: Re: Captains
Post by: MURP on September 15, 2007, 12:06:00 AM
Quote from: QB Eagles on September 11, 2007, 12:32:51 AM


What's the whole point here?


Quote from: Magical_Retard on September 11, 2007, 10:52:23 AM
i do not get the explanation either.



the reason is such...  college teams have captains to fulfill leadership rolls .... At the NFL level it was done to help promote leadership in the NFL.  it's that simple.  There is a lot of negativity going around with Pacman, Vick, Henry etc.  The NFL wants to try and promote positive role models on each team selected by the team. 

For one, I like it. 
Title: Re: Captains
Post by: QB Eagles on September 15, 2007, 12:28:43 PM
Quote from: MURP on September 15, 2007, 12:06:00 AMThere is a lot of negativity going around with Pacman, Vick, Henry etc.  The NFL wants to try and promote positive role models on each team selected by the team.

Had captains been chosen in March, is there any doubt that Vick would have been chosen as a captain?
Title: Re: Captains
Post by: MURP on September 15, 2007, 01:10:57 PM
thats a question for the Falcons players.
Title: Re: Captains
Post by: Eagles 3x on September 15, 2007, 02:34:11 PM
But we all know the answer. And that would have been the end of team captains. There would be no C's on the uniforms this year and no elections ever again. Too bad it didn't happen.
Title: Re: Captains
Post by: MURP on September 16, 2007, 12:57:31 AM
right, because if a captain gets in trouble the commissioner is going to scrap the entire thing.  makes total sense. 
Title: Re: Captains
Post by: Cerevant on September 16, 2007, 05:54:43 AM
No, if a captain gets in trouble you can have the dramatic news stories of him getting "stripped of the C" like they do in the NHL.