http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2637594
QuoteNEW ORLEANS -- Up to two NFL regular-season games will be played each year outside the United States starting in 2007, with possible sites limited at first to Mexico, Canada, England and Germany.
The plan, first announced last month, was approved Tuesday at the recommendation of new commissioner Roger Goodell, who said the benefits of reaching an international audience outweighed the negatives of some teams having to give up home games.
"We are talking about a limited number of games that we think will have a tremendous impact," Goodell said. "It's in response to the growing fan interest in our game overseas. There are more and more fans on a global basis."
Mark Waller, senior vice president of NFL International, said the league expected to schedule only one overseas game in 2007.
No specific sites were given for the games. However, Waller said the league hoped to announce the first site by this coming Super Bowl, while the teams would be selected later.
"Germany has a large number of sites as it's just done the World Cup. UK has a significant number of great sites," Waller said. "We know the sites in Mexico and Canada, so there's no shortage of venues that are interested in these games."
The plan would be set up so that teams would rotate over a 16-year period, with each team playing outside the country twice over that span, once as a visitor, the other as a home team. That means a team would lose one game team during that span.
"Obviously the league's going to work out the economics and if we lose a home game, we'll get compensated," said Pat Bowlen, owner of the Denver Broncos. "We're comfortable with it. Obviously we'd like to play in Mexico or Canada and not have to travel to Europe and that's probably the way it would be set up because of our location. But as far as the league's concerned, I think it's a great idea."
In 2005, the NFL staged its first regular-season game outside the United States when the Arizona Cardinals hosted the San Francisco 49ers in Mexico City. A crowd of 103,467 flocked to Azteca Stadium, the largest crowd for a regular-season game in NFL history.
The league also has played numerous exhibition games overseas for the past two decades. The New England Patriots and Seattle Seahawks will play a preseason game next August in Beijing.
Waller said the international popularity of certain teams would not necessarily determine who goes abroad. He said people in foreign markets were more concerned with simply hosting a regular season game, rather than exhibitions in which the best players tend to see little action.
"The overwhelming preference is the game itself," Waller said.
NFL games regularly have been televised live in Mexico and Canada and more recently in Europe, notably Britain.
The owners also voted to take the league's Web site, NFL.com, in-house after allowing CBS SportsLine to operate it for the past five years. The league plans to relaunch the site next spring with the help of other league-owned media such as NFL Films and the NFL Network.
The visit to New Orleans was a short one as most owners arrived either Monday night or Tuesday morning and left Tuesday evening.
Former NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue, before he officially left the job over the summer, had called for the regularly scheduled October meetings to be held in New Orleans as part of the league's show of support for the city as it rebuilds from Hurricane Katrina.
Owners and the commissioner said they have marveled at the repairs made to the Louisiana Superdome in less than a year and praised area fans for selling out the Saints' home stadium for the whole season.
However, Saints owner Tom Benson, while pleased with the progress, said the Saints still have nearly 30 of 137 suites in the Superdome unsold and added that his team lagged behind others in corporate sponsorships.
"Our sponsorship's nowhere near the level of the rest of the league," he said. "Our hospitality industry especially needs to come forward. I don't want to finger point or anything, but we have to work together in order to make this thing successful.
"The long-term market, nobody can tell right now," Benson continued. "But a year ago, before Katrina, we weren't quite sure and look what we've done. There's no telling what could happen."
As for when New Orleans, which has hosted nine Super Bowls, might get it's first since 2002, team owners were optimistic but noncommittal.
"I don't know about the next Super Bowl in line, but obviously New Orleans has always been a great place to host Super Bowls," Bowlen said. "I'd expect you'd see more."
Goodell said the bidding process for the 2011 Super Bowl will begin soon with a decision hopefully made by the next owners' meeting, slated for March in Scottsdale, Ariz.
Goodell said he has not spoken to New Orleans officials about a possible Super Bowl yet.
The Saints' lease in the Superdome ends that same season. So without an extension, the league would risk the awkward situation of placing a Super Bowl in a city that is in the process of losing its NFL franchise.
One of the cities often cited as a possible future home for the Saints or another small-market team is Los Angeles. Owners discussed a pair of proposals for a stadium in that area -- either a renovated Los Angeles Coliseum or a new stadium in Anaheim -- but there was no substantial progress made toward bringing the NFL back to the area.
One increasing concern is projected construction costs now escalating in the range of $1 billion. That makes the project decreasingly attractive to the league unless the costs are shared with the southern California public or a possible outside investor, several owners said.
"At this meeting, I don't think [NFL owners] were prepared to pay that for Los Angeles' stadium," Benson said. "I don't know if somebody else is out there that's willing to come into the NFL and do that or not. At this moment, I think it's on the back burner."
This is a total joke. All fans will be losing home games. On top of that the team loses the HFA factor. This is a terrible terrible deal, and I'm surprised people here aren't in an uproar already.
farg Goodell, that greedy POS. I hope he farging burns for this.
Gutentag! Enjoy our American Browns!
Watch them take away division games too. I'm getting so tired of the greed.
It is only a matter of time when one network owns rights to all NFL games and only airs one game a week for a huge monthly price.
The fairest thing would be to move in division teams (have the game be igs-gints, skins-boys) the same year....but you cant take those games away from a. the fans and b. the top national tv spots. like the igs lose a home game but the other teams get 8? dumb ass goddell. he could get away with it if hes moves teams that are going to suck. like this year everyone knew the titans and niners would suck, so move their games.
This might be the worst idea ever. Unless both games are Cardinals games. Then who cares.
wow. thats terrible.
Canada? The CFL can't be too fond of that.
Can't blame this on Goodell, this has been in the works for a long time under Tagliabue.
One game outside the US a year is a novelty; two is wearing out the idea. They should just make this a booby prize for the city with the lowest percentage attendance the previous year.
The owners won't defend the fans in this either because all they care about is money too. The only way the fans get their word across is if they start burning and looting NFL owned buildings.
no, i'm sorry. the correct answer we were looking for was rape and pillage.
why take regular season games international? they wouldnt know a preseason game from a reg season game!
Even International soccer (Man Utd, etc) games in the U.S. are only exhibition.
Quote from: QB Eagles on October 25, 2006, 12:16:26 AM
Canada? The CFL can't be too fond of that.
Actually, it depends on when they do it: the CFL finishes their season by mid-November. Of course, the reason for that is that it is farging cold up here after that point, but hey...those NFL guys can handle it. Also, they don't play CFL games on Sunday - by the looks of it, all the games are Friday night or Saturday.
Can you tell I wouldn't be heartbroken if the Eagles were scheduled to play a game at the Rogers Centre (aka Sky Dome)?
Are you all really that worried about one home game every 16 years?
they will have it set up so there are 32 games over 16 years...so that way each team plays two games out of the USA....meaning in a 16 year span the eagles will lose one home game
i would prefer for it to not happen...but really its a non issue
Quote from: ice grillin you on October 25, 2006, 09:09:15 AM
they will have it set up so there are 32 games over 16 years...so that way each team plays two games out of the USA....meaning in a 16 year span the eagles will lose one home game
i would prefer for it to not happen...but really its a non issue
ha...unless of course the owners put the international game on the season ticket bill along with an airline ticket, that should go over well.
Again, by making bad teams play the home games, you can limit the negative effect of losing a home game. Also, they should put the Eagles game in Montreal. It's 9 hours away and an amazing city. Good traveling fan bases should get games like that. So a team like the Giants can go to England or something, while we get a game on the continent.
Quote from: MDS on October 25, 2006, 09:17:41 AM
Again, by making bad teams play the home games, you can limit the negative effect of losing a home game. Also, they should put the Eagles game in Montreal. It's 9 hours away and an amazing city. Good traveling fan bases should get games like that. So a team like the Giants can go to England or something, while we get a game on the continent.
I think we'll find that will be the case - teams with fanbases who travel well (Philly, Pittsburgh, Green Bay) will get "local" games, where the teams with crappy fan bases will go overseas.
But think Toronto - it is a bit closer, more moderate climate, and they speak english :)
yous are making way to much sense
Somehow, when this happens, the three-week stretch of games for the Eagles will look like this:
MNF @ Seattle
Sunday game in Germany
Saturday game @Arizona
was just reading an article on this plan and found out a few noteworthy items
--each team will be able to protect one game on its schedule that cannot be played out of the country
--division games cannot be played outside the country unless both teams consent
--teams playing these games would have home games the week prior and bye weeks the week after
I think its stupid.
Pre-season games = fine
I hope the Eagles don't have to do that stuff.
Quote from: dis12 on October 25, 2006, 06:13:31 AM
why take regular season games international? they wouldnt know a preseason game from a reg season game!/quote]
This is exactly why there are no international pre-season games played in Europe any more, because the hard core fans do know the difference between a pre-season and regular season game. One of the reasons why NFL Europe was junked in Britain (particularly London) was because NFL fans here considered it second-rate. I'll admit I'd be pissed if I was an Eagles fan in the States or a season ticket holder and you are all right when you say money is the issue, that goes without saying. All the other major North American sports have mass appeal overseas apart from the NFL and they want a piece of the pie too, I'm assuming. Whether there will be enough overall interest, especially in London, for it to be justified is another matter.
I hope the Eagles don't have to do that stuff.
its not if its when
If i remember correctly it seemed like the Eagles had a strong following of fans from europe during the SB. Obviously hte coverage for the eagles was everywhere leading up to the game and i watched more football related tv than i had in my life, but I can see the Birds playing in the UK over any other countries.
i'm cool with an international tailgate. i don't see the problem here.
this is stupid. I can understand if football was like basketball or baseball with alot of games, but this is ridiculous. wonder what the players think? I mean who cares what they think...they make millions
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on October 25, 2006, 03:09:52 PM
If i remember correctly it seemed like the Eagles had a strong following of fans from europe during the SB. Obviously hte coverage for the eagles was everywhere leading up to the game and i watched more football related tv than i had in my life, but I can see the Birds playing in the UK over any other countries.
I remember during the Super Bowl buil-up, one English writer compared Eagles fans to the Manchester United fans. And he came to the conclusion that the MU fans were less vile.
Watching Euro Trip, I did feel like the MU fans were related to us somehow
Quote from: ice grillin you on October 25, 2006, 02:36:28 PM
was just reading an article on this plan and found out a few noteworthy items
--each team will be able to protect one game on its schedule that cannot be played out of the country
--division games cannot be played outside the country unless both teams consent
--teams playing these games would have home games the week prior and bye weeks the week after
That's huge.
One of my biggest worries for the Eagles having to travel out of the country was being caught in a short week or against a strong opponent the next week. At least this gives them some recovery time.
You can break beer mugs over your heads and sing ole ole.
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on October 25, 2006, 03:49:42 PM
Watching Euro Trip, I did feel like the MU fans were related to us somehow
Yeah, but isn't MU really good? Don't they actually win championships & stuff?
Quote from: mussa on October 25, 2006, 03:17:20 PM
this is stupid. I can understand if football was like basketball or baseball with alot of games, but this is ridiculous. wonder what the players think? I mean who cares what they think...they make millions
And it's not like they are paying for travel expenses either. All expense paid trips to Europe for millionaires is the shtein, son!
Looking at the way the league is approaching this, it doesn't look like a bad idea. So the Eagles will lose 1 home game like every 16 years or something. Wow, what a total ripoff. The NFL/participating teams stand to make a financial killing on this because I'm guessing that the games would be played in European soccer stadiums, most of which seat over 100,000 people if I'm not mistaken.
Stop being logical. It will not be tolerated.
Quote from: Sgt PSN on October 27, 2006, 11:58:25 AM
The NFL/participating teams stand to make a financial killing on this because I'm guessing that the games would be played in European soccer stadiums, most of which seat over 100,000 people if I'm not mistaken.
Only a couple actually. Wembley, if they ever finish rebuilding it, will seat around 80,000.
The Mexican venue is the only one likely to be significantly larger than a typical NFL stadium. I would assume that the NFL would try to get Wembley in the UK, Olympic Stadium or the Rogers Centre in Canada, and Olympiastadion or some of the other large NFL Europe arenas in Germany.