QuoteLife goes on after Owens, Reid says
By Bob Brookover
Inquirer Staff Writer
LAKE BUENA VISTA, Fla. - Scrambled eggs, home fries, and an assortment of fruit filled Andy Reid's breakfast plate early yesterday morning at the NFL owners' meetings.
A couple of curious reporters from Dallas and two others from Philadelphia sat at the same table as the Eagles' head coach in a room filled with his NFC peers, excluding Bill Parcells, the Cowboys' in-demand leader who has yet to publicly comment on his team's signing of Terrell Owens.
Apparently, Parcells has become far too important to attend such functions, despite the fact he has missed the playoffs during two of his three seasons in Dallas.
Anyway, here's a sampling of what Reid had to say on the subjects of T.O. in Dallas (the answers were predictably short) and the Eagles, who are attempting to rebound from last season's 6-10 trip to the bottom of the NFC East.
Question: How will Parcells handle T.O.?
A: He'll have a good time. He'll be all right.
Q: How do you feel about T.O. being in the same division?
A: He's part of their team. It's a team sport. T.O. will be the first one to tell you that.
Q: What was your life like with T.O.?
A: The first year was great.
Q: The second year?
A: No comment.
Q: Would you do the T.O. thing all over again?
A: I don't get into [second-guessing]. I don't say I shouldn't have done it. I did what I did, and you live with it.
Q: Have you heard or seen anything about T.O. saying he got a bad rap in Philadelphia?
A: I'm probably going to see it in July.
[July is when Owens' book about his Philadelphia experience will be released.]
Q: Have you heard T.O.'s rap song?
A: Yes, I have. It's always been one of my goals to get my name in a rap song. I still didn't make it.
Q: How and when did you listen to the song?
A: My son played it for me.
Q: Do you worry about any lingering fallout from the T.O. saga?
A: We've got so many guys up at [the NovaCare Complex] right now. Just about our whole team because of all the injuries. They've all been together and been able to get things off their chests. I think that's been a positive. You always get a good feel there in that first minicamp when you have everybody there, but right now I feel good about it.
Q: How would you categorize your wide receiver situation without T.O.?
A: I've never really said who's the No. 1 or who's the No. 2. I've always just said spread the ball around. That makes it tough on the defense. As long as you have guys who can run routes and catch the football, we're OK. You balance it out with the run game and go play.
It has a chance to be a strong corps. We added Jabar Gaffney, who has a chance to be a good player in this offense. Todd Pinkston's coming back and he's a good football player. You add Greg Lewis in there, and Reggie Brown and it's a pretty decent group.
Q: What's the team's interest in Buffalo's Eric Moulds?
A: We've looked at him. We're kind of going through that evaluation process right now.
Q: Do you need a star receiver to win?
A: I don't think you have to have the superstar. They don't have to be great players. They can be good players and do the things that are asked from them in the offense.
Q: Do you think Reggie Brown can be your top receiver?
A: He did a nice job for us. He runs great routes. After a bit there, we just put him at one spot and let him concentrate on that. He improved throughout the season. He's tough, he's fast and he's quick. He has to continue to catch Donovan [McNabb]'s football a lot this off-season.
Q: What did you like about Gaffney?
A: One thing that jumps out at you when you look at his tapes is he doesn't drop the ball. Great hands and runs very good routes. In this offense, those things go a long way. He has a good feel for the safety. We're going to use him a lot as the inside [slot] receiver in three-receiver sets. He wasn't afraid to cross the middle with linebackers and safeties.
Q: What will your offensive line look like this season, and is [left tackle] Tra Thomas going to be able to return from back surgery?
A: Tra is OK right now. Todd Herremans showed me some things last year at that position. He can play tackle, and he can jump in at guard. There's going to be some competition at the center spot. Jamaal Jackson has showed some good things. Hank [Fraley] has done a good job in the years he's been here. There's going to be some competition there.
Q: Will the offensive line be set by training camp?
A: I want competition. Artis Hicks [last year's starting left guard] isn't chopped liver, either. He's been starting for me for two years now. Put all those guys in the mix and it should be great competition.
Q: What about Dhani Jones as the strong-side linebacker?
A: He can do a better job than he did last year.
Q: Have you answered the questions you wanted to answer in free agency?
A: I thought [defensive end] Darren Howard was an important addition. It's been a bit under the radar, but I'm OK with that, too. He gives us a little pass rush we needed, and he can jump inside and rush over the guard, which he has had a lot of success with over the years. That will help us.
The quote about Dhani is telling. It shocks me that he is still on this team. Seriously. Cut the icehole and go get Hillenmeyer.
Umprompted Todd Herremans references make any interview worth my time.
i like that he basically said that herremans is not a guard...as ive said before him at guard would be a nightmare
just run good routes catch the ball and everything will be ok...wtf??
How do you interpret him saying Herremans is not a guard?!?
"He can play tackle and jump in at guard."
Phreak, how could you possibly construe that to mean Herremans has any ability to play guard? Fool.
:-D - And Tom Heckert has said that Herremans canplay OG too.
There was also a little sidebar piece in the actual paper about Westbrook and one of the things Reid said was that he passed way too much last year and he wants to go back to his 58-42 balance that he siad they have done it years past.
he can 'jump in' at guard
hes clearly saying in a pinch he can play guard...but that hes not a guard...which if youve ever seen him you can see that he isnt
Stop.
You've never seen him play OG.
No offense, man. But if Tom Heckert and Andy Reid think he can play OG I will take their word for it. Juan Castillo can get him redy to play LG. YOu put you best players out on the field and Herremans is one of the top 5 OL on the team.
artis hicks can play guard too...i bet tra can play guard if he 'jumped in' there as well.....runyan get your ass to LG stat
And yet you continue to ignore the fact that Tom Heckert has said that Herremans can play OG.
Thats cool..you can deny it now. But when he is the starting LG we'll see whats up.
i can't believe you two are having this arguement....again.
im not saying he wont play guard...im saying he CANT play guard
How can you say that? Because he is 6'6? You haven't seen him play OG.
well see....good to know that the eagles got a guy that can 'jump in' there tho
Herremans was drafted as a pure tackle. He is only being pimped as a guard, because the Eagles want him in there playing in games, as he'll probably be the new LT in 2007. You don't want a guy stepping in to play the most important position on the offensive line after basically sitting out a whole season.
Unfortunately, I think Herremans over Clarke at LG means a more pass-wacky offense.
Herremans was drafted as a pure tackle
pretty crazy considering thats what he is
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 30, 2006, 09:29:37 AM
Herremans was drafted as a pure tackle
pretty crazy considering thats what he is
I know... right?
I simply can only buy into Herremans as a guard as a desperate effort to get him some playing time.
for the record id like to point out that i think herremans has a bright future at tackle
Me too.
me three, ROFL!1!
Quote from: Sun_Mo on March 30, 2006, 09:37:58 AM
me three, ROFL!1!
Maybe I'm just sufferring from the morning after stupids, bt this made me laugh.
i semi-stole it from that Sam Adams commercial. but i put that special Sun touch on it to make it real
If you can play, you can play. Herremans can play so they'll plug him in at LG because, like I said, he is one of the 5 best guys on the OL.
Reid, Heckert and Castillo like versatile players. If you notice a lot of the players they draft or sign, with the exception of Runyan and Thomas have played elsewhere on the OL.
Clarke - T/G
Jackson - T/G/C
Darilek - T/G/C
Hicks - T/G
Andrews - G/T
And you look at Andrews. He was exclusively a T in college and where is he playing now? GUARD.
Right, because Andrews and Herremans are similar-style players with similar physiques. Good point.
The object is to have your best five offensive linemen playing at the same time.
If the Eagles think Herremans is one of those five and his natural tackle position is already being occupied by someone better, he'll be placed at the guard position. Players switch offensive line spots all the f'n time. It's not like you're taking a wide receiver and making him a running back.
My point was that just because you are labled a tackle does not mean you cannot play OG. What the hell? Can you guys not understand that the GM and the coach (which doesn't really count in IGY's eyes because he said "jump in") said the guy can play OG? Or do you not understand that having your 5 best players out there is the best thing to do regardless of what the hell their "true" positions are.
Maybe they should let him rot on the bench. Put Hicks back in there and let McNabb have a few more ribs busted up. Good point!
Not Hicks... Clarke. A better pure OG.
it's like in madden, sometimes your 3rd tackle has a better rating at RG than your best RG, so you play the tackle there
Quote from: Sun_Mo on March 30, 2006, 09:54:19 AM
it's like in madden, sometimes your 3rd tackle has a better rating at RG than your best RG, so you play the tackle there
That's why Westbrook was my slot receiver!!11!! LOLLERSKATES
Another example:
Tra was a RT in 1998. He moved to LT after some seasoning at RT
Jordam Gross played RT and then was moved to LT. Why? Because they let him get acclimated to the NFL on the right side and he was one of the 5 best players on the Panthers OL.
Larry Allen? Played both T and G.
Bentley? C & G.
But hey, I',m totally wrong on this one.
i'm with you Phreak.
of course all this arguing does nothing until they actually get on the field in July and we can really see where guys are playing.
One more.
Jonathan Ogden, the 4th overall player selected in 1996, was drafted to be a cornerstone LT. What position did the SIX FOOT NINE Ogden play in his rookie season?
Guard.
What are you trying to say, Phreak?
Guard.
And I need another beer.
All your examples of guys switching between LT & RT and C & G are meaningless. All really good Centers should be able to play Guard. All really good Tackles should be able to play on either side of the line.
So, if we're comparing apples to apples...
Larry Allen? Much stronger than Herremans will ever be. Guys with a more *stout* body type who also happen to have quick feet (theoretically, Andrews is like this) can play both OG and OT.
Jonathan Ogden? His pedigree is leaps and bounds above what Herremans can ever be. A guy with that level of talent can play anywhere on the line and make his team better.
Todd Herremans is not up to that level. He is a classic wait-and-see pass-blocking left tackle. He'll be a decent one, but he'll be no better than averagish if plugged in at OG. That said... averagish would be a huge improvement over the turnstile named Artis Hicks.
Herremans = LG = best thing for the team.
Goodnight. :)
^^^^^ + 1
winner
What are you trying to say, Phreak?
i think hes saying at some point in his career herremans will play guard...to which no one is disagreeing
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 30, 2006, 10:09:49 AM
^^^^^
winner
Obviously, this was meant for my brilliant post and not Phreak's rechurned garbage about "best for the team".
Unless the Eagles draft a guard in either the first or second round, or Thomas or Runyan get hurt, expect to see Herremans at one of the starting guard spots.
Bank on it.
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on March 30, 2006, 10:38:51 AM
Unless the Eagles draft a guard in either the first or second round, or Thomas or Runyan get hurt, expect to see Herremans at one of the starting guard spots.
Bank on it.
"
one of the starting guard spots"?? He won't sniff RG.
Herremans will be the starting LG this year. I'm just contending that he's not really the best guy for the job.
Unless the Eagles draft a guard in either the first or second round, or Thomas or Runyan get hurt, expect to see Herremans at one of the starting guard spots.
Bank on it.
welcome to the day runyan got resigned
Quote from: FFatPatt on March 30, 2006, 10:04:52 AM
All your examples of guys switching between LT & RT and C & G are meaningless. All really good Centers should be able to play Guard. All really good Tackles should be able to play on either side of the line.
So, if we're comparing apples to apples...
Larry Allen? Much stronger than Herremans will ever be. Guys with a more *stout* body type who also happen to have quick feet (theoretically, Andrews is like this) can play both OG and OT.
Yeah, but do you really see a 6-6 321 lb Herremans regularly getting overpowered despite not having what you call a *stout* body type? I don't.
Quote from: EagleFeva on March 30, 2006, 11:00:41 AM
Yeah, but do you really see a 6-6 321 lb Herremans regularly getting overpowered despite not having what you call a *stout* body type? I don't.
Define "regularly". If you mean more often than anyone else on the starting OL, then yes.
herremans has no mass and what little he does have is spread out...add in his 6-6/6-7 height and he has a non existent center of gravity...he also has extremely long arms which will allow defensive tackles to be able to get inside of him to easily....theres also the concern that hes never played guard at all much less at the nfl level
(http://guanubian.blogspot.com/images/Arafat_GAHHH.jpg)
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 30, 2006, 11:31:26 AM
herremans has no mass and what little he does have is spread out...add in his 6-6/6-7 height and he has a non existent center of gravity...he also has extremely long arms which will allow defensive tackles to be able to get inside of him to easily....theres also the concern that hes never played guard at all much less at the nfl level
link?
Quote from: EagleFeva on March 30, 2006, 01:11:06 PM
link?
(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/ILFIMKKAOKPB/todd_spot1.jpg)
(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/LLEHODCJCKIP/050802_TC_7.jpg)
link?
spend a few days at training camp...perhaps go to or watch an eagle game as well...
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 30, 2006, 01:15:28 PM
link?
spend a few days at training camp...perhaps go to or watch an eagle game as well...
And which game exactly would I have seen Herremans playing guard?
i said he didnt have the body or strength to be a successful full time nfl guard
Still looking for a fact...
Quote from: FFatPatt on March 30, 2006, 01:15:22 PM
Quote from: EagleFeva on March 30, 2006, 01:11:06 PM
link?
(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/ILFIMKKAOKPB/todd_spot1.jpg)
(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/LLEHODCJCKIP/050802_TC_7.jpg)
Cool... he's a white guy. Thanks.
Patterson's white? :o
That's why they tell you folks to never fall asleep in the sun. Next thing you know... you'll be waking up wondering when the next family barbecue is.
Look at his center, compared to Patterson's.
Patterson = low center of gravity
Herremans = not as low center of gravity
Quote from: EagleFeva on March 30, 2006, 01:35:02 PM
That's why they tell you folks to never fall asleep in the sun. Next thing you know... you'll be waking up wondering when the next family barbecue is.
Mmmmmm... BBQ.
:drool
im making pulled pork this weekend...but i dont bbq it...i cook it in kens garlic and herb sauce then flavor it with pork gravy after its shredded....lovely
i like pizza
BBQ and Wings are two things I can't get up here and it makes me angry. In the pants.
i dont like bbq sauce...shtein is nasty and is always to strong...you cant taste anything over it
A+-
IGY doesn't like BBQ sauce or Guinness. I'm fairly certain that that guarnatees that he also does not have a penis.
i don't really care for BBQ sauce either. it depends what we are talking about, but i can take it or leave it.
on the scale of dipping sauces, i go
ranch
honey mustard
ketchup
BBQ
for wings, buffalo sauce only, anything else if for the Romes.
bbq sauce = a southern/country thang
imma northeastern city cat
hi, i'm a cat
Ketchup sucks and should be banned from existence.
big....buckin'.....chicken.......
not a huge fan of ketchup either...condiments in general are only needed to cover up the deficiencies of the item they are going on
gravy is an exception
The commercial kind of cracks me up.
that's because you are half a moron, and that's your good half.
I heart bacon.
well...duh
Quote from: rjs246 on March 30, 2006, 02:18:26 PM
I heart bacon.
The Waco Kid just got wood, no doubt.
To ease the thread back on-topic, I'll bet Andy Reid hearts him some bacon.
Quote from: rjs246 on March 30, 2006, 01:47:00 PM
BBQ and Wings are two things I can't get up here and it makes me angry. In the pants.
I would think not having wings & bbq would make you happy in the pants. In the back of them, anyway.
RJS wears assless chaps...
he is a gay rodeo clown after all.
Does Andy Reid advocate team basketball, or does he want to have Allen Iverson's children?
There is no middle ground here.
Someone stole my chaps last week. Now I just walk around pantless.
god dammit... and i swore i wasn't going to jack at work today
for some unknown reason i decided to listen to spads live today
jerome mcdougle is the dumbest human being on the planet
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 30, 2006, 02:41:31 PM
for some unknown reason i decided to listen to spads live today
jerome mcdougle is the dumbest human being on the planet
No doubt.
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 30, 2006, 02:41:31 PM
for some unknown reason i decided to listen to spads live today
jerome mcdougle is the dumbest human being on the planet
are Jerome's, you know, answers, you know, annoying, you know, in a, you know, mike patterson kinda, you know, way?
spads asked him what his lowest weight was after all the surgeries and he began his answer with a valid 15 second ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 30, 2006, 02:49:35 PM
spads asked him what his lowest weight was after all the surgeries and he began his answer with a valid 15 second ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
:-D that rules. Good thing defensive lineman don't really have to be all that smart.
Good thing he won't be on the team after this season.
McDougle won't even be on the team this season. My bold prediction.
Yeah, he'll be elsewhere getting 15 sacks. ::)
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on March 30, 2006, 02:54:06 PM
Yeah, he'll be elsewhere getting 15 sacks. ::)
... and Eagles fans everywhere will bitch about how the Eagles should have signed him to a long term contract.
Yeah, he'll be elsewhere getting 15 sacks
come on dook...everyone knows eagle first rounders suck
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on March 30, 2006, 02:54:06 PM
Yeah, he'll be elsewhere getting 15 sacks. ::)
(http://www.fothergills.co.uk/images/thumbimages/10397-potatosacks.jpg)(http://www.fothergills.co.uk/images/thumbimages/10397-potatosacks.jpg)
(http://www.fothergills.co.uk/images/thumbimages/10397-potatosacks.jpg)(http://www.fothergills.co.uk/images/thumbimages/10397-potatosacks.jpg)
(http://www.fothergills.co.uk/images/thumbimages/10397-potatosacks.jpg)(http://www.fothergills.co.uk/images/thumbimages/10397-potatosacks.jpg)
(http://www.fothergills.co.uk/images/thumbimages/10397-potatosacks.jpg)(http://www.fothergills.co.uk/images/thumbimages/10397-potatosacks.jpg)
(http://www.fothergills.co.uk/images/thumbimages/10397-potatosacks.jpg)(http://www.fothergills.co.uk/images/thumbimages/10397-potatosacks.jpg)
(http://www.fothergills.co.uk/images/thumbimages/10397-potatosacks.jpg)(http://www.fothergills.co.uk/images/thumbimages/10397-potatosacks.jpg)
(http://www.fothergills.co.uk/images/thumbimages/10397-potatosacks.jpg)(http://www.fothergills.co.uk/images/thumbimages/10397-potatosacks.jpg)
(http://www.fothergills.co.uk/images/thumbimages/10397-potatosacks.jpg)
i truly hate you for that
You could have at least shown 15 sacks of shtein.
Quote from: Mad-Lad on March 30, 2006, 02:55:37 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on March 30, 2006, 02:54:06 PM
Yeah, he'll be elsewhere getting 15 sacks. ::)
... and Eagles fans everywhere will bitch about how the Eagles should have signed him to a long term contract.
Some of whom are posting in this very thread...
I just had grilled chicken with BBQ sauce and it was delicious.
i went and ate me some peanuts after seeing that.
wait those were potatoes?...eating those peanuts made no sense
Damn... all this cuz I mentioned barbecue?
Way to go, icehole.
Dave Spadaro, of PhiladelphiaEagles.com, reports Philadelphia Eagles DL Jerome McDougle is likely fourth on the team's depth chart. His role with the team is largely undefined now that the team signed DL Darren Howard.
Im thinking trade bait now, is that possible with his contract? Or do we keep him as 4th on depth chart?
No way he's trade bait. An unproductive guy coming off an injury? He has next to no trade value.
lol, Reese sucks at life
Quote from: Zanshin on March 31, 2006, 10:47:25 AM
No way he's trade bait. An unproductive guy coming off an injury? He has next to no trade value.
I completely disagree...injury? It was gunshot wound--that he said is completely healed, not a torn ligament. Hes still very young and could still have upside with room to improve. If not the Eagles, somewhere else.
maybe so...but there is no way he's trade bait that would entice anyone to look twice.
i'd be willing to bet that if the Eagles cut him today, he wouldn't be on a roster for opening day
Quote from: Wingspan on March 31, 2006, 10:54:38 AM
maybe so...but there is no way he's trade bait that would entice anyone to look twice.
this statement couldnt be more false. Have you seen what this offseason has produced in contract terms with no-namers? Your telling me a team wouldnt want help on the defensive line with a young player who came from a solid organization....puff.. puff.. pass
Quote from: reese125 on March 31, 2006, 10:59:11 AM
Your telling me a team wouldnt want help. . . a young player who came from a solid organization
Freddie Mitchell says hi.
Quote from: Sun_Mo on March 31, 2006, 11:01:20 AM
Quote from: reese125 on March 31, 2006, 10:59:11 AM
Your telling me a team wouldnt want help. . . a young player who came from a solid organization
Freddie Mitchell says hi.
whats coveted more Mo...DL or WR? Apprecite it
Quote from: reese125 on March 31, 2006, 10:59:11 AM
Quote from: Wingspan on March 31, 2006, 10:54:38 AM
maybe so...but there is no way he's trade bait that would entice anyone to look twice.
this statement couldnt be more false. Have you seen what this offseason has produced in contract terms with no-namers? Your telling me a team wouldnt want help on the defensive line with a young player who came from a solid organization....puff.. puff.. pass
like who?
the difference being of any of these "no-namers" they are given 1 year deals...a team would not trade for a no-namer. why would any team trade any pick for mcdougle when they can use that pick on a DE?
besides, mcdougle isnt all that "young" he was an older rookie. he's going to be 28 this year.
no one would give up anything for mcdougle.
just stop trying to prove you inane point that Jerome McDougle has any sort of trade value.
"He got shot."
"Is it bad?"
"As opposed to good?"
Quote from: Wingspan on March 31, 2006, 11:04:39 AM
Quote from: reese125 on March 31, 2006, 10:59:11 AM
Quote from: Wingspan on March 31, 2006, 10:54:38 AM
maybe so...but there is no way he's trade bait that would entice anyone to look twice.
this statement couldnt be more false. Have you seen what this offseason has produced in contract terms with no-namers? Your telling me a team wouldnt want help on the defensive line with a young player who came from a solid organization....puff.. puff.. pass
like who?
the difference being of any of these "no-namers" they are given 1 year deals...a team would not trade for a no-namer. why would any team trade any pick for mcdougle when they can use that pick on a DE?
besides, mcdougle isnt all that "young" he was an older rookie. he's going to be 28 this year.
no one would give up anything for mcdougle.
Cmon Wingspan...you package him....I repeat "bait", not a 1-1 McDougle for a superstar WR
i'd package him with no return address on the box.
no one in their right mind would take mcdougle. he wouldnt be the missing peice to any trade.
wing, it's not woth it. just cut your losses.
Quote from: Sun_Mo on March 31, 2006, 11:04:54 AM
just stop trying to prove you inane point that Jerome McDougle has any sort of trade value.
"He got shot."
"Is it bad?"
"As opposed to good?"
....and I thought you had
some knowledge of whats tradeable Mo. You trying to go against my every word/statement is more than pitiful. Be gone
reese, I can see why your idea might warrant some merit inside your own head, but trust me on this: McDougle won't be "bait" or be part of ANY trade this year, unless it's closer to the season and he's played his ass off in a few pre-season games. His trade value is ZERO right now, man. NOTHING.
The only Eagles players with any trade value that could conceivably be traded:
Hood
D. Walker
That's it.
reese, you're a stupid douche bag. how many players have gotten traded this offseason? not many. the ones that were traded, what did people give back? draft picks. a former 1st round DE who has shown NOTHING other than the ability to get injured and shot is not going to warrant ANY interest from ANY team.
for you to, first of all, even think that McDougle could be traded is laughable. but for you to continue to drive at this moronic point that somehow he has any value to any team makes me wonder how you have made it through life this long.
i repeat, if Jerome McDougle was cut today, the chances are greater than 75% that he would not be on any team come opening day.
Quote from: Sun_Mo on March 31, 2006, 11:15:50 AM
reese, you're a stupid douche bag. how many players have gotten traded this offseason? not many. the ones that were traded, what did people give back? draft picks. a former 1st round DE who has shown NOTHING other than the ability to get injured and shot is not going to warrant ANY interest from ANY team.
for you to, first of all, even think that McDougle could be traded is laughable. but for you to continue to drive at this moronic point that somehow he has any value to any team makes me wonder how you have made it through life this long.
i repeat, if Jerome McDougle was cut today, the chances are greater than 75% that he would not be on any team come opening day.
delete
Reno Mahe has more trade value than McDougle.
Wait, so is Jerome McDougle available? I think the Eagles should get him!
Quote from: reese125 on March 31, 2006, 11:20:00 AM
delete
as much as i thought i'd get from you when i presented a factual arguement
Quote from: Sun_Mo on March 31, 2006, 11:15:50 AM
reese, you're a stupid douche bag. how many players have gotten traded this offseason? not many. the ones that were traded, what did people give back? draft picks. a former 1st round DE who has shown NOTHING other than the ability to get injured and shot is not going to warrant ANY interest from ANY team.
for you to, first of all, even think that McDougle could be traded is laughable. but for you to continue to drive at this moronic point that somehow he has any value to any team makes me wonder how you have made it through life this long.
i repeat, if Jerome McDougle was cut today, the chances are greater than 75% that he would not be on any team come opening day.
yeah...that was needed ::)
sorry mom.
the vaGiants might want him... just to keep him away from eli.