ConcreteBoard

Eagles => Eagles Talk => Topic started by: Feva on December 20, 2005, 01:09:51 PM

Title: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: Feva on December 20, 2005, 01:09:51 PM
wost manneans (http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/homeNewsDetail.jsp?id=41974)
Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: hbionic on December 20, 2005, 01:12:16 PM
I can't help but laugh at how the blue ranger comes in and starts kicking everyone's ass. Nice! :yay
Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on December 20, 2005, 01:20:53 PM
I like seeing McMahon get pummeled from his blindside, makes me feel better when he throws a pick.
Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on December 20, 2005, 01:24:56 PM
At least he won't need surgery.
Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: hbionic on December 20, 2005, 01:31:24 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on December 20, 2005, 01:24:56 PM
At least he won't need surgery.

The blue ranger?
Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: Feva on December 20, 2005, 01:41:25 PM
Quote from: hbionic on December 20, 2005, 01:12:16 PM
I can't help but laugh at how the blue ranger comes in and starts kicking everyone's ass. Nice! :yay
I see you never watched the Power Rangers.  For shame!  ;D

That's actually the Green Ranger.  It's tough to see because of the lights, but you would know him when you saw him because of the golden shoulderpads.  :yay
Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: hbionic on December 20, 2005, 01:45:47 PM
Sorry, I lost track after the grand kids of the originals were becoming power rangers. It's almost like the academy was getting less and less strict. It must have been the benefits package they were offering.

Wasn't the chick from Alias a power ranger?
Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: Wingspan on December 20, 2005, 01:47:01 PM
mmmmm...pink ranger :drool

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/47/Amy_Jo_Johnson_(actress).jpg/250px-Amy_Jo_Johnson_(actress).jpg)
Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: BigEd76 on December 20, 2005, 01:49:50 PM
That was Amy Jo Johnson...
Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: Wingspan on December 20, 2005, 01:55:22 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on December 20, 2005, 01:49:50 PM
That was Amy Jo Johnson...

and?
Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: Rome on December 20, 2005, 01:56:28 PM
Ed's afraid to tell you about his "Felicity" fetish.

It's alright, Ed... you're among friends here.

:yay
Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: BigEd76 on December 20, 2005, 01:57:25 PM
bionic thought it was Jen Garner.  Was just telling him who it was.  WTF is your problem with me lately?
Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: Wingspan on December 20, 2005, 02:00:16 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on December 20, 2005, 01:57:25 PMWTF is your problem with me lately?
(http://packy.dardan.com/walky/albums/album11/aak.thumb.jpg)
Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: hbionic on December 20, 2005, 02:00:24 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on December 20, 2005, 01:57:25 PM
bionic thought it was Jen Garner.  Was just telling him who it was.  WTF is your problem with me lately?  :P

Man...something is up with the gene pool in Hollywood.

Every television generation seems to produce that same farging little boy or girl that you could have sworn was a kid 15 year prior.

Amy Jo Johnson? Jennifer Garner.....Hillary swank?

They're all pretty close looking.

Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: mussa on December 20, 2005, 03:21:42 PM
Bruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuce gets activated! :yay
Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: Beermonkey on December 20, 2005, 04:03:29 PM
Quote from: hbionic on December 20, 2005, 02:00:24 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on December 20, 2005, 01:57:25 PM
bionic thought it was Jen Garner.  Was just telling him who it was.  WTF is your problem with me lately?  :P

Man...something is up with the gene pool in Hollywood.

Every television generation seems to produce that same farging little boy or girl that you could have sworn was a kid 15 year prior.

Amy Jo Johnson? Jennifer Garner.....Hillary swank?

They're all pretty close looking.



They all got that same bony, horse-face gene that Sarah Jessica Parker inherited.
Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: SunMo on December 20, 2005, 04:05:11 PM
Quote from: mussa on December 20, 2005, 03:21:42 PM
Bruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuce gets activated! :yay

so Moats only gets 12 carries last week, but they need to activate another young unproven running back?
Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: ice grillin you on December 20, 2005, 04:10:57 PM
pennypack represent
Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: MURP on December 20, 2005, 04:48:15 PM
QuoteEven though Herremans suffered the injury, Reid said that there is enough tape on him to evaluate what role they want to see him in next season.

"He played against good enough players to get an idea of what he can do," said Reid. "You have a pretty good idea of what he can handle."

Sounds like Reid already knows what he is going to do in regards to Tra.
Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: Mad-Lad on December 20, 2005, 05:08:38 PM
Is Calvin Armstrong going to get extended playing time now?  Woo-Hoo!
Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: rjs246 on December 20, 2005, 05:09:24 PM
Quote from: Mad-Lad on December 20, 2005, 05:08:38 PM
Is Calvin Armstrong going to get extended playing time now?  Woo-Hoo!

Great! That means McMahon will be dead by the end of this week's game. This is all coming together nicely.
Title: Re: Herremans is lucky (or unlucky) number 13.
Post by: jeffreyjpa on December 20, 2005, 06:02:40 PM
So, is it safe to assume the Herremans and Runyan (since both he and Reid have expressed mutual interest in at least one more season) man the tackles next season?