A proven tradition had and did get violated this season.
Although the effort and thoughts are appreciate by all.....it is not 'farg dallas' or ever 'farg (insert opponent's name here)'. You see....we tried that during the days of the original emb(emb?) Yup. It started with dallas and then it bled onto other teams...but it simply did not work.
It is apparent that this happened yet again. You see....you can only farg one team....you have to have your heart in it...and it can't be split amongst more than one team....so...in the future....for the Eagles sake or I mean "our" sake and for tradition's sake.....we can only get together to farg one team, and one team only. It is like a farging spell....the proper words have to be typed and I will continue the tradition unless you all like to lose to Dallas....then you can farg off....otherwise....after Sunday or a monday night game before the Dallas game....look to the 'Eagles talk' section....after 9am Pacific Time....you will see the real thread manifest.
From all my posts after the Cowboys game, I was told that once a year you guys get your asses handed to you and than you come out strong. We hand your asses to you,you squeak by San Diego for a taterskinslike victory and than...........................................
(http://denver.rockymountainnews.com/art/slides/broncos/2005/103005eagles/4.jpg)
So which game was the asswhopping??
and then... as you're not making a comparison.
The Broncos game was the asswhooping. I don't know what these chowderheads were talking about after the Cowboys game. That was just an anomaly or aberration.
*except for a 10-15 play sequence in the kc game the eagles have looked horrible all year
*- i dont count the sf game
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 01, 2005, 11:10:16 AM
*except for a 10-15 play sequence in the kc game the eagles have looked horrible all year
*- i dont count the sf game
You're a skins fans, you don't count.
And hey, Dallas Troll....good to see you ONLY come to the board when the Eagles lose. Class act, you are. :yay
Quote from: Boyzguru on November 01, 2005, 10:56:53 AM
From all my posts after the Cowboys game, I was told that once a year you guys get your asses handed to you and than you come out strong. We hand your asses to you,you squeak by San Diego for a taterskinslike victory and than...........................................
(http://denver.rockymountainnews.com/art/slides/broncos/2005/103005eagles/4.jpg)
So which game was the asswhopping??
I got your taterskinlike victory
(http://msn.foxsports.com/id/4888286_7_2.jpg)
You're a skins fans, you don't count
youre just salty cause after the one oclocks this week you thought you might be back in our wager....then the broncos dropped a half dollar on the birds...
the REAL reason the Eagles lost to Dallas and Denver is because the defense gave up an average of 41 points. No matter how you rationalize it, that's horrendous. They always say they strive to limit opposing offenses to no more than 17 points and both times haven't done their jobs.
Quote from: Mad-Lad on November 01, 2005, 11:44:46 AM
the REAL reason the Eagles lost to Dallas and Denver is because the defense gave up an average of 41 points. No matter how you rationalize it, that's horrendous. They always say they strive to limit opposing offenses to no more than 17 points and both times haven't done their jobs.
17 points per quarter is not what they had in mind
The real reason we lost is because our coaching just isn't that good right now.
Quote from: Boyzguru on November 01, 2005, 10:56:53 AM
From all my posts after the Cowboys game, I was told that once a year you guys get your asses handed to you and than you come out strong. We hand your asses to you,you squeak by San Diego for a taterskinslike victory and than...........................................
(http://denver.rockymountainnews.com/art/slides/broncos/2005/103005eagles/4.jpg)
So which game was the asswhopping??
You have as many losses as we do moron. You lost to the Raiders! Hahahaha!!
Quote from: rjs246 on November 01, 2005, 11:51:54 AM
The real reason we lost is because our coaching just isn't that good right now.
give that man a cigar!
I thought the real reason we lost is because we just suck ???
No, it's because the players are bieng coached to not catch, throw well, run block, or tackle.
Quote from: General_Failure on November 01, 2005, 02:04:45 PM
No, it's because the players are bieng coached to not catch, throw well, run block, or tackle.
So that rumor is true! :o
Quote from: General_Failure on November 01, 2005, 02:04:45 PM
No, it's because the players are bieng coached to not catch, throw well, run block, or tackle.
They're being coached to pass block, pass, run routes and catch. Opposing defenses are being coached to sprint in a direct line at our QB since there is no chance that anything other than a pass is even an option.
They're being coached to catch? That's new to me.
Quote from: General_Failure on November 01, 2005, 02:58:07 PM
They're being coached to catch? That's new to me.
Never seen a WR coach work on catching technique?
We have a WR coach?!
Because the taterskins are an overrated group of douchebags and were exposed against the Giants.
Farg the taterskins...I don't believe in karma.
Quote from: Mad-Lad on November 01, 2005, 11:44:46 AM
the REAL reason the Eagles lost to Dallas and Denver is because the defense gave up an average of 41 points. No matter how you rationalize it, that's horrendous. They always say they strive to limit opposing offenses to no more than 17 points and both times haven't done their jobs.
Amen. The Eagles under Reid have never been a smazsh mouth control the ball type of offense. Especially, with the addition of TO they have become a quick strike offense who will produce plenty of three and outs. If the D just keeps getting the ball back with decent field position the O will work.
Both sides of the ball are playing terribly. We are 4-3 because we have talent. If you look at most teams in this league, and their offense and defense play this bad they win 1 game. While the defense has been brutal, maybe the game would've been 28-28 if the offense did their job. You never know. I think both sides of the ball share equal blame right now.
there's no excuse for a defense giving up 28 points at the half, no matter what the offense does. Here in Chicago the offense is run by a rookie (4th round i believe) quarterback, but the defense is good enough to at least keep them in the game. If the Bears had the Eagles offense, they'd be incredible.
Quote from: The Waco Kid on November 01, 2005, 03:29:29 PMFarg the taterskins...I don't believe in karma.
There is much unrest in the heavens. The gods frown upon thee for lack of faith. Repenteth and ye shall be redeemed. You have been warned. :evil :evil :evil
Quote from: PhillyGirl on November 01, 2005, 11:12:56 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 01, 2005, 11:10:16 AM
*except for a 10-15 play sequence in the kc game the eagles have looked horrible all year
*- i dont count the sf game
You're a skins fans, you don't co
And hey, Dallas Troll....good to see you ONLY come to the board when the Eagles lose. Class act, you are. :yay
Skin, you know I have been one of the few that gives credit where it is due. Our payback will be had later for sure.
snorkeling,
I fuel off your and some of your colleagues agony. Actually I have seen some humor on this board. I thought we were bad annointing Barber the next Herschell until I see a fire a coach that has resurrected your team from the ashes of Kotite and Ray Rhodes. You guys keep me entertained. No worries,I got another month of dishing ahead of you snorkeling after we complete our sweep.