ConcreteBoard

Football => The Rest of the NFL => Topic started by: rjs246 on September 16, 2005, 01:40:57 PM

Title: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: rjs246 on September 16, 2005, 01:40:57 PM
OK, so I hate being that guy who looks back in (relative) hindsight, and says "wah wah wah we should have picked *insert random flash in the pan's name* instead of *insert underperforming/inactive Eagles rookie*." But the fact is that this kid represents EXACTLY what the Eagles are missing in their offense. I like the Lamar Gordon pickup and I hope that he can be the short yardage hammer that the offense needs, but Jacobs is a farging truck and was available into the fourth round.

Anyway, I think that he and Tiki have the potential to have a huge year together and he makes the Giants offense scarier than it has been in a while.

That's all.
Title: Re: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: Tomahawk on September 16, 2005, 01:41:57 PM
He went to SIU.

WAR SALUKIS!!!!
Title: Re: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: 4and26 on September 16, 2005, 01:43:31 PM
Hindsight but I do agree  . . .especially since he's with the Giants
Title: Re: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 16, 2005, 01:53:30 PM
A lot of people thought the Eagles would have interest, and maybe they did... but not at a 3rd round level.

They think the upside of a gamebreaker-type back like Moats is better than just getting a big body.
Title: Re: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: MURP on September 16, 2005, 02:00:50 PM
I too wanted Jacobs in the draft.  oh well.  Now I hope Trotter gives him the snot bubbles.
Title: Re: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on September 16, 2005, 02:03:35 PM
Jacobs backed up Brown and Williams at Auburn before transferring to SIUC.
Title: Re: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: rjs246 on September 16, 2005, 02:03:41 PM
There are a lot of schmucks who are simply 'big bodies' but Jacobs does not appear to fall into that category. The kid was a really good college back (he was at Auburn for a while unless I'm mistaken and only left because he would have been sharing carries/backing up Williams and Brown). Anyway, we have a gamebreaker in Westrbook. What we needed was a bulldozer and the wherewithall to extend Westbrook. Sadly have had neither so now we are faced with the very real possibility that Westbrook will leave, and another undersized back to step in for him.

Like I said, hopefully Gordon does the trick, and if he does then hopefully we can keep Westbrook (or Moats will fill in for him effectively). But the fact that until a few days before opening kickoff there wasn't a single back on the roster who could bang it up the middle shows how little our coaching staff recognizes their own team's biggest weakness.
Title: Re: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 16, 2005, 02:06:31 PM
The reason they couldn't draft a complimentary back to Westbrook was because they weren't sure they'd have Westbrook beyond 2005, and they believe replacing him would be much harder than finding a decent "big" back.

I think Gordon can be very good.  We'll see.
Title: Re: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: rjs246 on September 16, 2005, 02:18:03 PM
I hope you're right. I'm just saying that:

Extending Westbrook + drafting Jacobs = boner

while

Not extending Westbrook + drafting Moats + Moats being inactive for game 1 + Reno Mahe + Lamar Gordon = no current chub with only a slight chance of future wood
Title: Re: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: General_Failure on September 16, 2005, 02:22:18 PM
Maybe not for you, but I hear Banner is opening doors with pelvic thrusts these days.
Title: Re: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: WEST is GOD on September 16, 2005, 04:25:18 PM
I just don't think Eagles like big backs. I don't necessarily agree with that, but if the Eagles get one it's going to be someone off the waiver wire.
Title: Re: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: rjs246 on September 16, 2005, 04:28:09 PM
Very informative, Avenger. Do you think that maybe they'll pick up a big back off the waiver wire this season? Maybe it'll be that guy Lamar Gordon.
Title: Re: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: WEST is GOD on September 16, 2005, 04:34:05 PM
I'm talking about generally. Don't be a wise ass. Just saying if you really want that big back don't get your hopes up. Then again, Andy learned his lesson about receivers with TO, so there is always hope.
Title: Re: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: rjs246 on September 16, 2005, 04:41:37 PM
Quote from: Avenger on September 16, 2005, 04:34:05 PM
...don't get your hopes up...
...there is always hope...

Wah wah wah. Don't tell me to not be a wise ass. You bring it upon yourself.
Title: Re: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: WEST is GOD on September 16, 2005, 04:44:37 PM
Take responsibility for your own actions.
Title: Re: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: rjs246 on September 16, 2005, 04:49:44 PM
Quote from: Avenger on September 16, 2005, 04:44:37 PM
Take responsibility for your own actions.

I take responsibility for conastantly pointing out how idiotic your arguments are. Does that count?
Title: Re: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: WEST is GOD on September 16, 2005, 04:54:38 PM
I didn't make an argument in this thread, I made a point. There is nothing to argue here. The Eagles don't like big backs, and that is obvious at this point.
Title: Re: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: BigEd76 on September 16, 2005, 06:33:44 PM
The Eagles liked Jacobs, but in the 4th or 5th, not the 3rd.  The Giants took him early in the 4th...
Title: Re: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: QB Eagles on September 16, 2005, 07:04:23 PM
If Jacobs keeps stealing Tiki Barber touchdowns, it's going to be a long fantasy year for me.
Title: Re: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: Larry on September 17, 2005, 10:06:13 AM
Even if we drafted Jacobs, he'd be in the same place Moats is now....#4 on the depth chart.
Title: Re: Brandon Jacobs
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on September 17, 2005, 10:41:14 AM
I was defininitely hoping the Eagles made the move for Jacobs.  Even more after he ran a 4.45 at 265 pounds but you win some you lose some and i think the Eagles saw Moats there in the third and couldnt pass him up making Jacobs expendable because at the time we had buck back healty and in the best shape of his career.