ConcreteBoard

Eagles => Eagles Talk => Topic started by: GeneralZOD on August 26, 2005, 09:08:08 AM

Title: #49 vs. #48
Post by: GeneralZOD on August 26, 2005, 09:08:08 AM
http://www.philly.com/mid/philly/sports/football/12480671.htm

I'm at a standstill on this one guys.........

Parry or Ritchie; and why?
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: PhillyGirl on August 26, 2005, 09:11:09 AM
Ritchie Pros:

Blocks better
Catches better

Ritchie cons:

Blew out his knee last year, how will he hold up?


Parry Pros:

No injury history
Serviceable
He looks like my husband  ;)

Parry Cons:

Serviceable
Has problems holding onto the ball when thrown
Didn't block as well for Westy last year (compared to Ritchie)



Tough call. Healthy, Ritchie hands down. But his knee worries me.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: DH on August 26, 2005, 09:11:57 AM
I take Ritchie - but only if he starts bleeding from his head again.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: rjs246 on August 26, 2005, 09:14:05 AM
Parry Pros:

He knocked Sean Springs the farg out.

Parry Cons:

He eats balls by the dozen.


Ritchie Pros:

Blocks like a freaking battering ram whe healthy.
Catches the ball.
Bleeds from his farging horns.

Ritchie Cons:

Knee.
New helmet doesn't allow his head to bleed as nature intended.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: MadMarchHare on August 26, 2005, 09:16:08 AM
From my perspective, I take Ritchie.  If his knee isn't healed, hell, it's not like Parry won't be available to come in.
Cut Ritchie, and someone will pick him up.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: ice grillin you on August 26, 2005, 09:23:35 AM
i get a point for this as i said a couple months ago that ritchie would have to blow parry out of the water to make the team and that i didnt think that would be the case...while everyone else said if ritchie is healthy he wins the job hands down

actually ill go a half point for now and a full point if parry wins out


thank you

Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on August 26, 2005, 09:23:46 AM
Josh Parry is still looking for a LB to put a block on...

Oh,wait! Parry just tripped over his feet and fumbled without a defender within 5 yards of him.

I'm rooting for Ritchie.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: MURP on August 26, 2005, 09:39:46 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on August 26, 2005, 09:23:35 AM
i get a point for this as i said a couple months ago that ritchie would have to blow parry out of the water to make the team and that i didnt think that would be the case...while everyone else said if ritchie is healthy he wins the job hands down

actually ill go a half point for now and a full point if parry wins out


thank you



whoa, slow down there Icy.   A half point for nothing?  I thought this was MURP vs. ICE?  I havnt argued this Parry/Ritchie thing yet!   

but just to make it interesting Ill take Ritchie and you can take Parry.   If Ritchie makes the team its  5.5 to 0.   If Parry Makes it, it will be 4.5 to 1.    holla.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: GeneralZOD on August 26, 2005, 09:40:37 AM
Hailing from Shippensburg and having played against the incredible Jon Ritchie in high school, I gotta give him the nod to make the 2005 squad.  However, I still think Parry should make the team as a special teams player, even though that might not be likely to happen.  If Ritchie does indeed make the cut over Parry, are there any NFL teams out there that would take Parry?   
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: Larry on August 26, 2005, 09:41:29 AM
Ah just go with 3 WR all the time.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: rjs246 on August 26, 2005, 09:41:39 AM
Quote from: GeneralZOD on August 26, 2005, 09:40:37 AM
If Ritchie does indeed make the cut over Parry, are there any NFL teams out there that would take Parry?   

Hopefully someone in the NFC East. I would love to go up against his blocking/receiving 'skills' twice a year.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: phattymatty on August 26, 2005, 09:44:26 AM
Ritchie bleeds.  And from his head, not his vagina, like Parry.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on August 26, 2005, 09:45:11 AM
Joe Gibbs would take him. He has like 47 FBs on the roster.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: PhillyGirl on August 26, 2005, 09:45:34 AM
Quote from: phattymatty on August 26, 2005, 09:44:26 AM
Ritchie bleeds.  And from his head, not his vagina, like Parry.

Right, Parry's a wuss.  ::)  What an absolutely ridiculous post.


IGY, way to try to sneak in a half a point there, dude.  :-D
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: ice grillin you on August 26, 2005, 10:06:30 AM
whoa, slow down there Icy.   A half point for nothing?  I thought this was MURP vs. ICE?  I havnt argued this Parry/Ritchie thing yet!   

but just to make it interesting Ill take Ritchie and you can take Parry.   If Ritchie makes the team its  5.5 to 0.   If Parry Makes it, it will be 4.5 to 1.    holla.


i had to get on the board somehow...it was getting embarrassing

Ritchie bleeds.  And from his head, not his vagina, like Parry.

lolol

idiot
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: phattymatty on August 26, 2005, 10:11:24 AM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 26, 2005, 09:45:34 AM
Quote from: phattymatty on August 26, 2005, 09:44:26 AM
Ritchie bleeds.  And from his head, not his vagina, like Parry.

Right, Parry's a wuss.  ::)  What an absolutely ridiculous post.

Not saying he's a wuss, just saying he has a nice vagina.  Jealous much?
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 26, 2005, 10:28:01 AM
Carlos Perez is the father of Josh Parry's man-babies.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: Diomedes on August 26, 2005, 10:29:00 AM
I would feel comfortable only with a healthy Ritchie.  Anything short of that will make me nervous.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: phattymatty on August 26, 2005, 10:32:36 AM
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 26, 2005, 10:28:01 AM
Carlos Perez is the father of Josh Parry's man-babies.

I read that the other day too.  The preferred nomenclature is poo-babies.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 26, 2005, 10:33:14 AM
Sorry, I'm not up on the current slang.  I haven't hung out with Beermonkey recently.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: rjs246 on August 26, 2005, 10:33:59 AM
Dammit! Those posts were money! No chance they should have been erased.

Vibrating chest hair! That's GOLD!
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: ice grillin you on August 26, 2005, 10:44:00 AM
there arent to many things in the world that concern me less than the eagles fullback position...i think its just behind the melting of the polar ice cap
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: phattymatty on August 26, 2005, 11:55:27 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on August 26, 2005, 10:44:00 AM
there arent to many things in the world that concern me less than the eagles fullback position...i think its just behind the melting of the polar ice cap

check is in the mail nougat.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: phattymatty on August 26, 2005, 11:56:35 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on August 26, 2005, 10:33:59 AM
Dammit! Those posts were money! No chance they should have been erased.

Vibrating chest hair! That's GOLD!

Wrong thread chief.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: rjs246 on August 26, 2005, 12:20:20 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on August 26, 2005, 11:56:35 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on August 26, 2005, 10:33:59 AM
Dammit! Those posts were money! No chance they should have been erased.

Vibrating chest hair! That's GOLD!

Wrong thread chief.

Christ. I can't keep up with my own nonsense. I quit.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 26, 2005, 12:23:34 PM
rjs and Yeti are both quitters.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: Beermonkey on August 26, 2005, 12:31:14 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 26, 2005, 10:33:14 AM
Sorry, I'm not up on the current slang.  I haven't hung out with Beermonkey recently.

They're saying that Parry is a huge titty-baby & will be working at BK shortly.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: Rome on August 26, 2005, 12:42:40 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 26, 2005, 12:23:34 PM
rjs and Yeti are both switch hitters.

Correction.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: General_Failure on August 26, 2005, 01:48:33 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on August 26, 2005, 09:45:11 AM
Joe Gibbs would take him. He has like 47 FBs on the roster.

Silly Phreak, those are H-backs. The Skins don't use fullbacks because H-backs are cooler.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: mussa on August 26, 2005, 02:04:14 PM
as offical sponser of ritchie bleeding horns...i say he makes the team.  hes to valuable even if hes not 100 %.  i wouldn't of picked him if i didn't think hes making the team, and he IS.  You can all verbally kick me if he doesn't.   :flipoff
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: ice grillin you on August 26, 2005, 02:18:50 PM
check is in the mail nougat

i love you
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on August 26, 2005, 02:22:03 PM
Quote from: mussa on August 26, 2005, 02:04:14 PM
as offical sponser of ritchie bleeding horns...i say he makes the team.  hes to valuable even if hes not 100 %.  i wouldn't of picked him if i didn't think hes making the team, and he IS.  You can all verbally kick me if he doesn't.   :flipoff

Dude, it's like totally spelled sponsor......I learned that in AA.
Title: Re: #49 vs. #48
Post by: WEST is GOD on August 26, 2005, 04:02:55 PM
Ritchie was a good end zone target in 03.