Week Seven - 2014

[Rome]

So wait...  Foles < Manning?

Prove it.

[smeags]

yeah the broncos. they just destroyed the team that the eagles couldn't score an offensive TD against. they are a lot better than the eagles.

yeah but the eagles shutout the giants who scored 21 against the cowboys who beat the seahawks in seattle who beat greenbay earlier in the year.

[SD]

yeah the broncos. they just destroyed the team that the eagles couldn't score an offensive TD against. they are a lot better than the eagles.

yeah but the eagles shutout the giants who scored 21 against the cowboys who beat the seahawks in seattle who beat greenbay earlier in the year.

Exactly

You can throw all the "this team beat that team" bullshtein out the door. Now I'm not saying the Eagles are better than Denver, but they beat the Niners if they're not starting Herremans at RT and a bunch of truck drivers up the middle. Not to mention the Eagles were in Frisco who were coming off 2 straight losses where as they were in Denver and Peyton was going to break the record.

[phattymatty]

i was just pointing out that the broncos would destroy the eagles, not that the eagles are bad.

[Rome]

Not in Philly.  They'd probably win but I don't see the Eagles getting lit up by anyone at home.

In Denver?  Oh yeah...

[phattymatty]

how about at MetLife stadium??

[rjs246]

I'm sorry but what are you meatsacks arguing about? Matt said that the Broncos are better than the Eagles, which is about as bland and obviously true as a statement can be. The Broncos would be the Eagles 9 out of 10 times in Philly and 11 out of 10 time in Denver. That is a 100% victory rate. Maths.

But seriously, you don't need to come to the defense of the Eagles over a nothing statement that is 100% true and obvious to anyone with eyes.

[smeags]

I'm sorry but what are you meatsacks arguing about? Matt said that the Broncos are better than the Eagles, which is about as bland and obviously true as a statement can be. The Broncos would be the Eagles 9 out of 10 times in Philly and 11 out of 10 time in Denver. That is a 100% victory rate. Maths.

todd ? is that you ?

[Geowhizzer]

I'm sorry but what are you meatsacks arguing about? Matt said that the Broncos are better than the Eagles, which is about as bland and obviously true as a statement can be. The Broncos would be the Eagles 9 out of 10 times in Philly and 11 out of 10 time in Denver. That is a 100% victory rate. Maths.

But seriously, you don't need to come to the defense of the Eagles over a nothing statement that is 100% true and obvious to anyone with eyes.

So you're saying there's a chance...

[phattymatty]

how about at MetLife stadium??

i totally forgot that the super bowl was in new york last year.

i mean how about university of phoenix stadium??

[Rome]

I'm sorry but what are you meatsacks arguing about? Matt said that the Broncos are better than the Eagles, which is about as bland and obviously true as a statement can be. The Broncos would be the Eagles 9 out of 10 times in Philly and 11 out of 10 time in Denver. That is a 100% victory rate. Maths.

But seriously, you don't need to come to the defense of the Eagles over a nothing statement that is 100% true and obvious to anyone with eyes.

I just said they would beat the Eagles at Denver but wouldn't get lit up in Philly.  No one is arguing and Matty can handle us bullies without his prison bitch getting all uppity.

[Sgt PSN]

Lol

[SD]

ha

[smeags]

rome went all Oz on rusty.

[ice grillin you]

yeah cause the eagles are historically so dominant at the linc

shtein even five of chip kellys eight eagle losses are at home