Awful Iverson trade rumor

[hunt]

lol...hes a terrible shooter..he shoots worse than iverson

jj also shoots a better % than iverson...much better from 3 range.

[ice grillin you]

hes not a pt guard and never will be...he is however versatile which is why i said hes a real nice player to have as a 6th man who can come in for a couple different positions and play well for you

btw telling people they just looked up stats on the internet is played out (especially when i referenced no stats)...its just a way of trying to defend an indefensible position and frankly is 3rd gradish...you can do better than that

[reese125]

im not trying to battle you IGY, but when you hear non-sense about a particular player, hes not this and that, you have to defend your point and think to yourself, "did this guy ever even watch one Hawks game (not Pheonix--2 way different scenerios), because if he did....theres no way he could be saying this right now."

[ice grillin you]

jj also shoots a better % than iverson...much better from 3 range.

well i didnt look up there stats but if hes better than iverson he cant be much better...and with his height advantage (plus the fact that iverson isnt a shooter) he should be much higher...either way hes not a GREAT shooter as reese ridiculously said

[phattymatty]

i am happy to admit i watched zero hawks games this year.

[hunt]

jj also shoots a better % than iverson...much better from 3 range.

well i didnt look up there stats but if hes better than iverson he cant be much better...and with his height advantage (plus the fact that iverson isnt a shooter) he should be much higher...either way hes not a GREAT shooter as reese ridiculously said

here, i looked it up for you:

johnson-
this year: 45% shooter, 36% from 3 pt range
last year: 46% shooter, 48% from 3 pt range
career: 44% shooter, 38% from 3 pt range

iverson-
this year: 45% shooter, 32% from 3 pt range
last year: 42% shooter, 31% from 3 pt range
career: 42% shooter, 31% from 3 pt range

and stop it with the height advantage bs...a1 doesn't get extra credit for being short.  johnson certainly is not a terrible shooter or a worse shooter than iverson no matter how you look at it. 

anyway, this is really an arguement of johnson vs harrington...not johnson vs iverson.

[ice grillin you]

actually its about paying a third option type guy 70 million

[hunt]

actually its about paying a third option type guy 70 million

actually 4 years left on his contract & around $57.6 mill...but who's counting? 
i read that harrington's deal is expected to start at around $8 mill per year so they're probably looking in the 4 yr/ 36 mill or 5 yr/ 47 mill range.

[Rome]

i am happy to admit i watched zero hawks games this year.

The last time I watched a Hawks game is when Dominique Wilkens played there.