your political leaning is...

Started by ice grillin you, January 05, 2007, 06:52:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Eaglez

Oh yeah, and that whole porno question got the nod, too.


Geowhizzer

27, believe it or not.

And I agree, some of these questions are just bad.  Who do I trust more, union leaders or business executives?  NEITHER.  They both have their own agendas and work towards that.

ice grillin you

you people realize that its who do you trust more...not do you trust either


Government is good

yes
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Geowhizzer

#33
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 05, 2007, 10:00:37 PM
you people realize that its who do you trust more...not do you trust either

I don't trust either at all.

Quote from: ice grillin you on January 05, 2007, 10:00:37 PM
Government is good

yes

This is probably where my 27 comes in, but government is not good.  Limited government is good, but limited government's been gone since FDR (and maybe since his cousin Teddy).

MadMarchHare

C'mon, Geo.  Limited gov't is gone because of FDR.
Anyone but Reid.

MDS

16

makes sense. im pretty moderate, but right now given the state of country, lean left.
Zero hour, Michael. It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. I'm sick of playing second fiddle. I'm always third in line for everything. I'm tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over.

Eaglez

Ugh, I abhor Unions. Maybe they served a purpose when the educational or informational gap was expansive during the early 20th century, but they are utterly useless now.

All they do is raise costs and act as an effective barrier to employment for people on the outside looking in. On top of that, I can't understand how union members can be satisfied with the efforts of their union. They withdraw funds from your paycheck to supposedly represent you during employment negotiations. But most union officials have proved to be wholly inept at doing that as well.

At least business executives have eyes towards expanding their capital endeavors and creating jobs and opportunites elsewhere. Now, not all business execs act ethically or optimally, but more do so than not. If they didn't, there would be no economic expansion; or at least economic expansion would be seriously impeded. 

Business = good; government or other agencies meddling into the economy and in between the employer/employee relationship EXCESSIVELY = crappy

Geowhizzer

Quote from: MadMarchHare on January 05, 2007, 10:07:46 PM
C'mon, Geo.  Limited gov't is gone because of FDR.

Theodore Roosevelt started the process during his administration.  Indeed, though, the last vestiges went with the New Deal.

Sgt PSN

Quote from: Geowhizzer on January 05, 2007, 10:28:14 PM
Quote from: MadMarchHare on January 05, 2007, 10:07:46 PM
C'mon, Geo.  Limited gov't is gone because of FDR.

Theodore Roosevelt started the process during his administration.  Indeed, though, the last vestiges went with the New Deal.

But without the New Deal, there'd be no symbol for Bert Bell to name his franchise after.  So we got that going for us. 

Geowhizzer

Quote from: Sgt PSN on January 05, 2007, 10:34:49 PM
Quote from: Geowhizzer on January 05, 2007, 10:28:14 PM
Quote from: MadMarchHare on January 05, 2007, 10:07:46 PM
C'mon, Geo.  Limited gov't is gone because of FDR.

Theodore Roosevelt started the process during his administration.  Indeed, though, the last vestiges went with the New Deal.

But without the New Deal, there'd be no symbol for Bert Bell to name his franchise after.  So we got that going for us. 


QB Eagles

I'm an extreme libertarian -- one thin thread away from being a total anarchist -- so for me a lot of this quiz was like "Who should Mike Tyson rape? Your sister, your wife, or your mother?" Plus it's hard to take too seriously a quiz that can't even spell "Jesse Jackson" correctly.

I found it useless but I scored a 30 for those interested.

PoopyfaceMcGee

I prefer the way they spelled it, though.

Cerevant

An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

PoopyfaceMcGee


rjs246

18. Basically dead center. Nuke the right. Burn the left.
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.