Ramsey Getting Booed (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/19/AR2005081902017.html)
QuoteThe boos came pouring down from the stands by Washington's third drive after the latest errant pass from Patrick Ramsey. But on the taterskins' next possession, just when the 60,291 spectators at FedEx Field had seemingly tired of waiting for Ramsey to solidify his position as the starting quarterback, he turned the catcalls into cheers with his first touchdown of the season. However, Ramsey couldn't keep the cheers -- or the scoring -- coming during a roller-coaster performance in Washington's 24-17 preseason loss to the Cincinnati Bengals last night.
QuoteIf we can do what we did tonight without the turnovers, then we'd score a lot of points," Ramsey said. "And I think it's a successful night for all of us. But those turnovers killed us. It negates really what we did."
No shtein, genius. If any NFL team eliminates turnovers they'll score points.
So the taterskins fans booed Brunell last year and chanted for Ramsey. Now they've got Ramsey and they're booing him.
Since I expect numerous instances where we'll get to point and laugh at the Skins this year, I figured I'd crank up this thread.
Last place here they come!
Damn you Phreak, I just came here to post that.
I have a feeling this thread will develop well this year.
sounds like other team's fans just may be paying attention to the way Eagles fans behave. We expect good performance, and will cheer for it....but, make a few mistakes and you will see and hear our dark side.
One of their idiot fans seems to be living on Pluto when it comes to discusing The Leg's support of the Skins.
QuoteDon't know about the rest of you but to me Theisman sounds like he played his entire career for the Cowboys. Everytime he's commentating he's dogging out the team that put his butt on the map. Wheres your loyalty Theisman?
Salisbury says the taterskins will struggle to win 7 games...
Quote from: BigEd76 on August 20, 2005, 02:07:39 PM
Salisbury says the taterskins will struggle to win 7 games...
So that means they will win at least seven. :sly
The skins and the cowboys are both brutal. Both will struggle to win 7 games. The skins are horrible though. Campbell was the dumbest trade up idea.
Especially since they told everyone publically that's why they traded up.
"Our offense rocks!" (http://www.kffl.com/forums/showthread.php?t=135309)
:-D
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 22, 2005, 08:56:18 AM
"Our offense rocks!" (http://www.kffl.com/forums/showthread.php?t=135309)
:-D
This is my favorite:
QuoteAnd Carlos Rogers - welcome to the NFL. He needed that embarrassment, and I think Greg Williams set him up - and wisely so. I think he's going to have an excellent rookie year - as long as he's healthy.
They're basically saying their defensive coordinator put Carlos Rogers in a situation to fail to teach him a lesson. Riiiiiight. It's more like he was sadly the best healthy CB they had for the game.
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 22, 2005, 10:38:09 AM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 22, 2005, 08:56:18 AM
"Our offense rocks!" (http://www.kffl.com/forums/showthread.php?t=135309)
:-D
This is my favorite:
QuoteAnd Carlos Rogers - welcome to the NFL. He needed that embarrassment, and I think Greg Williams set him up - and wisely so. I think he's going to have an excellent rookie year - as long as he's healthy.
They're basically saying their defensive coordinator put Carlos Rogers in a situation to fail to teach him a lesson. Riiiiiight. It's more like he was sadly the best healthy CB they had for the game.
That's the message board equivalent of tripping & saying "I meant to do that".
Quote60,291 spectators at FedEx Field
Ahahahaha! 3/4 capacity in a place where tickets used to be harder to come by than an honest politician.
I love it.
farg the Chesapeake Watershed Indigenous Persons!
:-D
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 22, 2005, 10:38:09 AM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 22, 2005, 08:56:18 AM
"Our offense rocks!" (http://www.kffl.com/forums/showthread.php?t=135309)
:-D
This is my favorite:
QuoteAnd Carlos Rogers - welcome to the NFL. He needed that embarrassment, and I think Greg Williams set him up - and wisely so. I think he's going to have an excellent rookie year - as long as he's healthy.
They're basically saying their defensive coordinator put Carlos Rogers in a situation to fail to teach him a lesson. Riiiiiight. It's more like he was sadly the best healthy CB they had for the game.
:-D :-D :-D
"Hey Greg, what happened there?"
"Well Joe, I decided that the 9th overall pick in the draft needed to be taught a lesson. So I played cover zero, talked to Marvin Lewis and told him to throw the bomb on consecutive plays and voila...I taught our rookie CB a lesson. What lesson that is? I don't know. But it was nice to see him get smoked on back to back plays, wasn't it? Because getting burtn really instills confidence in the young guys!!"
Fargin moron ass Skin fans.
Wow. Skins fan is beyond dilusional if they think that a coach was deliberately setting a player (a rookie at that) up to fail. Show me a coach who intentionally puts his player(s) in position to fail and I'll show you an unemployed coach.
McNabb. See: Thrash, Pinkston.
I for one don't think that Greg williams put carlos in there to get burned and i don't think that i have heard another fan say that.
What did happen..... Carlos was put up against Chad Johnson even though Shawn Springs(our number 1 for those of you that don't know) was in the game. GW even says that he puts in his players at different times in preseason games to test them. He would put in our 3rd safties in at the start of the game. Carlos did very well in the beginning with an INT but had a pass interference call against him which was one in which he made contact to a receiver after 5 yards. Carlos became very tired and was picked on by the offense. One play he was burned but the receiver failed to catch a sure TD, then on the very next play they hit Carlos again and got the TD.
GW did put him in to make him play good WRs like Chad Johnson one on one but never did it in the hopes that he would learn something from getting burned
That's all well and good but surely you don't think we'll stop laughing at the team do you?
IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT YOU THINK!!
;)
I don't need a legitimate reason to laugh at the taterskins or their delusional, sissybitch fans.
I laugh at them because they're simply the most clueless collection of candyasses I've ever come across and their bizarre hero worship of a fossil like Joe Gibbs is annoying at best and downright pathetic at worst.
Farg them and the horse they collectively rode in on.
:)
QuoteIn the words of the great Col. Hannibal Smith, I love it when a plan comes together. Tonights win is huge for Gibbs, Ramsey, and the whole team. Things like better execution, timing, and that "just knowing where he's going" quality between QBs and WRs will come in time, but Gibbs' offense got it rolling tonight on the league's best defense. It was great to see, and at times it really looked like the old taterskins. Some of those counter runs of Betts' were classic Skins. We might be looking back at this game someday as the beginning of the turn around. Great win!
And Art chimes in:
QuoteThe turnaround came against Philly in the second game last year.
That's when the team started showing Gibbs' character and toughness. It'll just get better the longer he's here. With our line being as strong as any we'll see, it'll start to look good this year barring a lot of injuries.
Quote#3. That is the biggest preseason game. AND it came against such an amazing defense and team. Please also don't forget, we SHOULD have won 17-3! Against a 15-1 team last year!
I do not want to hear any b!tching and moaning. At all. Period. We OWNED them. Without Gibbs giving up what he will REALLY do once the season starts. Try to refute it.
I will hang up and listen to your answers. Good luck, naysayers.
:-D
I guess they forgot that Ramsey threw a beautiful, beautiful pass to Troy Polamalu who took it to the house?
Nice play, Patrick. Keep it up, buddy.
I can't understand how there is absolutely NO realism.
You guys call me a homer, but I'll at least say something sucks when it does, in fact, suck.
Skins' fan lost all sense of realism long, long ago
hehe (http://www.kffl.com/forums/showthread.php?t=136137)
hehe again (http://www.kffl.com/forums/showthread.php?t=136139)
Hahahahahaahhaha!! The DTC has their own MB. (http://deadtreecrew.proboards30.com/index.cgi#shtein)
Beermonkey knows about these guys...if you haven't read up on the DTC, do so and I guarantee a ton of laughs. These guys are hilarious and the biggest Hoydas ever.
QuoteI hate eagle's fans with all my heart
True Story:
I got some new people that moved on my street. They have a 8 year old boy. I saw him wearing a Westbrook jersey and I got real mad. No Philly fans can live on the same street as the President! As I was debating how to handle this event I saw him wear a Bears jersey. So I thought to myself he just a kid and wears what ever player he likes...I can live with that. Then I saw his dad a few days later and he was wearing a VA Tech shirt. I stopped him in the street to tell him how relieved I was that they like local teams and I told him that I almost stole his son's jersey. He replied that they are from PA and they are HUGE eagle's fans. I told him to stop moving his crap in and get the farg off my block. He laughed so I realized he didn't know who he was dealing with, so I told him that on the week on the eagle's game that I am going to something very mean like steal his dog. I told that I can't help it, it is in my blood. He called me a jackass taterskins fan! I am planning to kid nap his to kids the eight year old boy and the other, which I think may be like ten months old.
Anyone else in?
Here's some pics of them...check out the 7th pic down (http://deadtreecrew.proboards30.com/index.cgi?board=SOC&action=display&thread=1117635664)
Backwards jersey's....WWE belts...hilarious!
someone needs to send this to that wiggaz site:
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y256/Ashlo1/DTC/prezceomayor.jpg)
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 27, 2005, 10:34:36 AM
someone needs to send this to that wiggaz site:
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y256/Ashlo1/DTC/prezceomayor.jpg)
:-D They have headbands with permanent black marker to spell out DTC :-D What a bunch of fargin douches. Did the skins keep they're starters out after the Steelers pulled back like the Bengals attemtped to do?
Thanks for posting a link to that site. I just wasted a good 15 minutes reading all that crap. What a bunch of freaking morons. Those pics are funny as shtein though. :-D What a bunch of losers.
Why? Why why why did you have to bring the farging DTC over here. I was hoping to never have to think about them ever again. These farging douches grew up in the same county I did in VA. The county with the best public school system in the country. And yet, here they are, pretending to be thugs and threatening to shoot/fight people.
Dude's you're white. And ugly. Stop.
They rank right up there with Malibu's Most Wanted.
:o What in the world is that?
What a bunch of... :-D
The only time I even, for a single second, got along with Art over there (prior to my unceremonious removal from their board), was when a certain phattymatt and I ganged up on the DTC for three straight days a few years back.
It was short lived but it extended my stay on their board for a few weeks. To this day nothing gets me fired up like reading the nonsense over there. Not even a sliver of reality enter's any of their minds when it comes to the skins.
Eagle fans, I have a BIG problem with them.
There team has NEVER won a Super Bowl, but you couldn't tell that by the way most of them talk.
WIN something before y'all get "high and mighty" on yourselfs, iggle fans.
Ahhh, Silly taterskin fans.
Wow. The Skins won a preseason game with a vanilla gameplan against a nearly undefeated team from last season that surely brought out every trick they had. Cower's offensive genius was no match for Gibbs and whoever the farg is running that defense.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on August 27, 2005, 09:24:17 AM
I guess they forgot that Ramsey threw a beautiful, beautiful pass to Troy Polamalu who took it to the house?
Nice play, Patrick. Keep it up, buddy.
Eagles might beat the Skins once this year
Quote from: General_Failure on August 27, 2005, 02:14:02 PM
Wow. The Skins won a preseason game with a vanilla gameplan against a nearly undefeated team from last season that surely brought out every trick they had. Cower's offensive genius was no match for Gibbs and whoever the farg is running that defense.
Skins defense is better than iggles, IMO.
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on August 22, 2005, 11:36:13 AM
Quote60,291 spectators at FedEx Field
Ahahahaha! 3/4 capacity in a place where tickets used to be harder to come by than an honest politician.
I love it.
farg the Chesapeake Watershed Indigenous Persons!
:-D
Yeah, and just a few short years ago you iggles fans didn't know if your team would be on TV because of it not being a sell out. You had to wait until Acme would buy the remaining 10,000 tickets, what a joke, you are the ultimate bandwagon jumpers. How many Super Bowl victories??? Sorry, that was low
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on August 27, 2005, 09:24:17 AM
I guess they forgot that Ramsey threw a beautiful, beautiful pass to Troy Polamalu who took it to the house?
Nice play, Patrick. Keep it up, buddy.
Yeah, it looked just like McNabb the week before!! You, guys from the 700 level?
Quote from: archer on August 27, 2005, 10:46:09 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on August 22, 2005, 11:36:13 AM
Quote60,291 spectators at FedEx Field
Ahahahaha! 3/4 capacity in a place where tickets used to be harder to come by than an honest politician.
I love it.
farg the Chesapeake Watershed Indigenous Persons!
:-D
Yeah, and just a few short years ago you iggles fans didn't know if your team would be on TV because of it not being a sell out. You had to wait until Acme would buy the remaining 10,000 tickets, what a joke, you are the ultimate bandwagon jumpers. How many Super Bowl victories??? Sorry, that was low
That's because the Vet had a ton of 'Obstructed View Seats' Brain Surgeon. Sorry if people didn't want to pay $50 to watch the game behind a pole. I was a season ticket holder from 88'-95' (Went into the Navy Sept. '96) and the crowd hasn't changed one bit.
Quote from: archer on August 27, 2005, 10:42:23 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on August 27, 2005, 02:14:02 PM
Wow. The Skins won a preseason game with a vanilla gameplan against a nearly undefeated team from last season that surely brought out every trick they had. Cower's offensive genius was no match for Gibbs and whoever the farg is running that defense.
Skins defense is better than iggles, IMO.
They're fantastic, especially without Pierce and Smoot who you retards termed 'Core Skins' last season. Your D is top 10 'at best' and certainly not good enough to carry your team, otherwise you would have been better than 6-10 last season. Have fun smoking Gibbs pole this season and wishing you were us. :)
Quote from: archer on August 27, 2005, 10:42:23 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on August 27, 2005, 02:14:02 PM
Wow. The Skins won a preseason game with a vanilla gameplan against a nearly undefeated team from last season that surely brought out every trick they had. Cower's offensive genius was no match for Gibbs and whoever the farg is running that defense.
Skins defense is better than iggles, IMO.
Your opinion isn't worth the toilet paper it's normally written on.
I don't get this.
The taterskins:
- Haven't had a winning record anywhere near the Reid era for the Eagles;
- Have gone through several HCs, OCs, DCs, and STCs;
- Only seem to sell out games when FedEx field turns into Lincoln Financial South;
- Having their "All-Pro Defense" burned by the likes of C Johnson, T Small, Pinkston, Thrash, etc.
- Fight with the Giants and Cowboys for LAST place in the NFC East
- Are still without a bonafide QB, LB Corps, reliable Special Teamers, and IMO a good WR corps;
- Couldn't handle the salary cap to save their lives;
- Haven't cracked more than 6 wins in too many recent years;
- Have 1 playoff appearance, NO Division Titles, NO Conference Titles in at least the last 8 years;
And yet, a (rather delusional) fan jumps on the site of the rival team that has consistentantly beaten them to a bloodless pulp and states "Their defense is better than the Eagles!" and "The Eagles might win a game against the Skins this year."
This is normally the part where someone writing a response like this would say "%@#$ you!" or "You @$#$#wipe!" or words to that effect.. However, that is not my way. Instead, I will say that your beliefs will hold water. In fact, these beliefs of yours are actually true. And they will remain true until kickoff - when Skins fans will once again wake up to the reality that they are still light-years away from being anything close to a consistent threat to the Eagles NFC dominance.
As for your Lombardis? You guys, along with Cowboy fans, hold on to those like hungover alcoholics hanging on to a bottle, trying to relive some dream that will never come back. Your past glory is just that - and constantly referring back to it is like Al Bundy talking about his "4 Touchdowns in One Game" back in High School. His life is a failure right now, and that is all he has to fall back on. Just like the taterskins fans.
We look forward to meeting you guys in the 2005-6 Regular Season. >:D >:D :evil :evil :evil
Hey archer...
Go farg yourself.
How's the 1 playoff appearence in 13 years feel? Oh sure you can go back and jerkoff to Gibbs' past SB victories but you sound like a Cowboys fan bringing up the past.
Here's some news for you, jackhole...
Gibbs is done. He is overmatched. Thank your lucky charms for Gregg Williams because without him you would be in SF 49ers territory of 1-2 wins.
Gibbs, Cerrato and Snyder are colossal farg ups. Gibbs was good in the 80's and early 90's...but in this era of NFL football he is cooked.
So I hope you enjoy Snyder pumping you in your ass to go to that zesty stadium to watch a lousy football team.
Enjoy your 4-5 wins this year, clown.
taterskins D is better than Eagle D
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on August 27, 2005, 09:24:17 AM
I guess they forgot that Ramsey threw a beautiful, beautiful pass to Troy Polamalu who took it to the house?
Nice play, Patrick. Keep it up, buddy.
Atleast he went on more than one play before doing that ;)
LAugh and point at the taterskins?
Its Ok the entire league has been laughing and pointing at you the whole offseason
i am a taterskins fan from another board. before you sit here and try dis me, all i want is to have an intelligent, peaceful conversation with some hopefully intelligent people on these boards. from what i've seen in this threads is a bunch of ignorant fans. please prove me wrong.
Quote from: Catapult on August 28, 2005, 12:53:46 AM
I don't get this.
The taterskins:
- Haven't had a winning record anywhere near the Reid era for the Eagles; - we still hold the series lead over you guys
- Have gone through several HCs, OCs, DCs, and STCs; true on that
- Only seem to sell out games when FedEx field turns into Lincoln Financial South; sorry, every home game was sold out last season, we set an attendance record at the home opener vs. the bucs with 91,000 fans
- Having their "All-Pro Defense" burned by the likes of C Johnson, T Small, Pinkston, Thrash, etc. more like having a rookie be taugh a lesson, i can't believe you even put pinkston on that list, do i need to show the clip where he deliberatly dropped the pass to avoid being slammed by sean taylor last year?
- Fight with the Giants and Cowboys for LAST place in the NFC East - say what you want while you can
- Are still without a bonafide QB, LB Corps, reliable Special Teamers, and IMO a good WR corps; still without a bonafide lb corps? wtf are you smoking, we have arrington and washington on the outside, both are pro bowlers, and we have a reliable player in the middle.
- Couldn't handle the salary cap to save their lives; that's why we've never had a salary cap purge like the titans had, in case you haven't noticed it hasn't been that way the last few years
- Haven't cracked more than 6 wins in too many recent years; meh, i'll give you that one
- Have 1 playoff appearance, NO Division Titles, NO Conference Titles in at least the last 8 years; yeah that one playoff appearance, we won the division,sorry to burst your bubble.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 05:20:22 AM
taterskins D is better than Eagle D
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on August 27, 2005, 09:24:17 AM
I guess they forgot that Ramsey threw a beautiful, beautiful pass to Troy Polamalu who took it to the house?
Nice play, Patrick. Keep it up, buddy.
Atleast he went on more than one play before doing that ;)
LAugh and point at the taterskins?
Its Ok the entire league has been laughing and pointing at you the whole offseason
Nice comeback, Bacon.
You clowns can laugh and point all you want but we're the top team in the NFC. So what if TO acted like a child? We've got him. You've got Sideline Santana, David Patten and Point To The Sky Trash.
We've got stability at the QB position.
You dopes have two #1 picks in the last 4 years and a guy who Jesus H. Gibbs spent $43M on. And none of them can play worth a shtein.
Would you like to bet on who has the better defense, genius? If we do...then we're going by points allowed. The yardage stats are misleading.
The Eagles defense will be a shteinload better than Washington's. Take that to Daniel $nyder's bank.
Quote from: mooby on August 28, 2005, 08:09:38 AM
i am a taterskins fan from another board. before you sit here and try dis me, all i want is to have an intelligent, peaceful conversation with some hopefully intelligent people on these boards. from what i've seen in this threads is a bunch of ignorant fans. please prove me wrong.
I just don't like the taterskins. I like to laugh at their misfortunes. Does that make me ignorant? If so, well then I'm guilty as charged. :)
Quote from: mooby on August 28, 2005, 08:09:38 AM
i am a taterskins fan from another board. before you sit here and try dis me, all i want is to have an intelligent, peaceful conversation with some hopefully intelligent people on these boards. from what i've seen in this threads is a bunch of ignorant fans. please prove me wrong.
The people on this site understand football better than the fans on any message board I've ever been to. They also happen to be Eagles fans. You're not going to get a whole ot of respect here because your team is garbage and your fans are completely incapable of seeing that. To be treated as an intelligent fan of a rival team you must first aknowledge that Skins fans (stereotypically) have no grasp of the depths their team has sunk to before any of us will give you the smallest bit of credit. I have lots of friends who are Skins fans since I spent most of my adult life living around DC, and I can tell you that only one of them has any sort of realistic outlook on the team. I win lots of money betting against the Skins from the other ones. It's like some disease that resides in the DC Metro area's drinking water. You're all incapable of recognizing your pile of shtein football team for what it is, even though there is over a decade's worth of evidence at your disposal to prove it.
The fact of the matter is that the taterskins are terrible and have been for the entire Dan Snyder reign. There doesn't appear to be any light at the end of the tunnel either as they continuously fumble through every offseason and have no hope of ever putting a consistant product on the field while Snyder is the owner. So either start there, prove that you aren't an idiot, or expect everyone here to treat you like a typical delusional skins fan nitwit.
Even with our piece of shtein offense we managed to hold the ball longer in our offense's hands, and have less plays than your D. your defense had a greater time of possession than your great offense. Even our offense held the ball longer than our D.
Our points were given up due to the field position that our offense put us in on every play, many points were field goals that were just made even when the team went 3 and out.
We had 3 less FDs per game(which seperates us by about 12-15 teams) we had much less yards per game and you only beat us by 2 turnovers.
We beat you in 3rd down percentage where we ranked second and you ranked around the middle
The only statistical catagory that you did well in was yards per play but we even beat you in that while we ranked second and you ranked somewhere in the top ten or so.
By putting our D with your offense you would make our D even better than it is. It is even more credit that we ranked 3rd in D when our offense ranked 3rd from last in offense.
When you score as many points as the Eagles do you don't have to hold onto the ball very long.
We're all very proud of your team's defense, but this is a TEAM sport and since 2/3 of your team sucks donkey chode it doesn't really matter how good the other 1/3 is no does it?
Did you happen to see the Eagles first 2 drives on Friday night?
That's what they did all last year. The game against the Lions, the score was 21-0 before a lot of people even found their seats (exaggeration, but you get the point).
Time of possession means nothing, yards allowed...nothing.
POINTS ON THE SCOREBOARD AT THE END OF THE GAME is all that matters. If you think otherwise, you are delusional beyond repair.
Stop pimping out useless stats. We went 13-1 (last two games don't count) and made the superbowl. You went 5-11 and lost to Dallas twice. We gave up less points than you. That is the only stat the really matters on defense. Who cares about 3rd down conversion percentage and time of possession. Our offense was better than yours, our defense was better than yours. In fact, every single thing about our franchise down to the stadium food and cheerleaders is better than the taterskins. Stop with the useless stats. Just admit the Skins are trash and will be as long as Danny boy is running the ship.
Quote from: rjs246 on August 28, 2005, 11:19:41 AM
When you score as many points as the Eagles do you don't have to hold onto the ball very long.
We're all very proud of your team's defense, but this is a TEAM sport and since 2/3 of your team sucks donkey chode it doesn't really matter how good the other 1/3 is no does it?
hmmm 1/3 of our Team didn't let a kick return and a punt return go back on the Steelers, Your special teams is not something to be holding up that high.
but everyone knows that our offense sucked the big one last year. It is no secret. No fans are that delusional not to see that. Our special teams were not much better than average either. But that doens't mean a team can not improve. Our offense needed speed at WR. no one expects us to be the number one offense or top ten, we might possibly break top 16 if lucky but we changed what we needed to
I know that preseason means very very very little so don't go off and blow this up but this so far is the only thing that we can rate our piece of shtein offense of last year on.
http://www.nfl.com/stats/teamsort/NFL/OFF-TOTAL/2005/pre?sort_col_1=undefined
We are ranked second right now in total yards, again this means nothing but we have been showing a hell of a lot more preduction than last year. Ramsey has thrown for 330 yards in the past two games which he played exactly one half in each. It is an improvement no matter what anyone says, last year we fell below 100 yards passing for entire games numerous times.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 11:27:58 AM
I know that preseason means very very very little so don't go off and blow this up but this so far is the only thing that we can rate our piece of shtein offense of last year on.
http://www.nfl.com/stats/teamsort/NFL/OFF-TOTAL/2005/pre?sort_col_1=undefined
We are ranked second right now in total yards, again this means nothing but we have been showing a hell of a lot more preduction than last year. Ramsey has thrown for 330 yards in the past two games which he played exactly one half in each. It is an improvement no matter what anyone says, last year we fell below 100 yards passing for entire games numerous times.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on August 28, 2005, 10:02:13 AM
Would you like to bet on who has the better defense, genius? If we do...then we're going by points allowed. The yardage stats are misleading.
So true, Phreak...the ONLY defensive stat that matters, bottom line, is points allowed. Even while resting all of the starters in the last two games (and the second and third stringers giving up 58 points in those two games), the Eagles still led the NFC in points against (260), and were second in the NFL only to Pittsburgh, with 251.
What the yardage and TOP stats don't show is that the Eagles may let teams move between the twenties, but they don't let them score TDs. Also, as several have pointed out, the Eagles offense takes so little time to score in most cases, the defense doesn't get much time off the field, so the TOP stats are significantly skewed.
Pretty friggin' impressive, if you ask me...and scary to think that the 2005 Eagles defense will be even better. :evil
Again with our offense your D would be horrible, like it was said this is a team game and 1/3 of the team can't do it all. A good offense will help a Defense and a good defense will help an offense.
Look at the steelers, i don't think there offense is the shtein but their D did very well and helped them out.
Without our D our offense would be worse than it was last year, it would rival one of the worst in the past decade.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 11:32:21 AM
Again with our offense your D would be horrible,
Hmmm, so when the Eagles had Thrash and Pinkston/Charles Johnson and Torrance Small, how in the hell did they get to the playoffs and NFCCGs? Everyone always said it was the DEFENSE.
You're making an ass out of yourself with comments like these. May I suggest you find another hobby?
Christ. Talking in cirlces talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles talking in cirlcles. Just stop. Your team eats ass. Period.
We had 16.6 points per game and you had 16.3
Damn i thought the way you were talking it was like 14, i knew my own teams but had to look it up for you.
with our offense and field position which cause many many field goals even if they went 3 and out our team still D gave up .3 more points a game and DESTROYED you in every statistical catagory.
maybe if you didn't give up 120 yards per game on the ground
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 11:38:00 AM
We had 16.6 points per game and you had 16.3
Damn i thought the way you were talking it was like 14, i knew my own teams but had to look it up for you.
with our offense and field position which cause many many field goals even if they went 3 and out our team still D gave up .3 more points a game and DESTROYED you in every statistical catagory.
maybe if you didn't give up 120 yards per game on the ground
LOL, you realize that the 120 yards per game on the ground is usually at the end of the game when it matters for shtein. Take, for example, the opening game last year vs. the Giants. Tiki Barber had 125 yards total for the game.
72 of them came with like 5 minutes left to play in a game the Eagles were winning 31-10. That's how it worked all year. Don't throw that bogus stat at me, I'll beat you every time.
And for the yards run earlier in the game? Well, if you can't get in the endzone, what the farg is the point?
But, you're missing the point...no one is saying the taterskins' Defense sucks. We're just saying the Eagles defense is better, AND improving, and it was a response to a taterskins' fan claiming the Skins defense was better. Points allowed is the only stat that matters. The Eagles defense wouldn't have given up 58 points in the last two games if they had any meaning, since the starters rested.
And, if you look at the rushing stats per game (not on average), the Eagles gave up a lot of rushing yards--but, NOT POINTS--in the first half of the season, and then were much stingier the rest of the season after Trotter moved full-time into the middle. The Eagles also significantly beefed up their interior DL for 2005.
RE: your opinion that the Eagles defense would be horrible without the Eagles offense...at which defensive positions do you think the taterskins are better?
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 28, 2005, 11:42:25 AM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 11:38:00 AM
We had 16.6 points per game and you had 16.3
Damn i thought the way you were talking it was like 14, i knew my own teams but had to look it up for you.
with our offense and field position which cause many many field goals even if they went 3 and out our team still D gave up .3 more points a game and DESTROYED you in every statistical catagory.
maybe if you didn't give up 120 yards per game on the ground
LOL, you realize that the 120 yards per game on the ground is usually at the end of the game when it matters for shtein. Take, for example, the opening game last year vs. the Giants. Tiki Barber had 125 yards total for the game. 72 of them came with like 5 minutes left to play in a game the Eagles were winning 31-10. That's how it worked all year. Don't throw that bogus stat at me, I'll beat you every time.
And for the yards run earlier in the game? Well, if you can't get in the endzone, what the farg is the point?
You honestly think you have BEAT? me? WTF? what you guys are thinking that your .3 points less per game makes you the best fricking Defense in the entire league. Our Defense in your Defenses position would do a hell of a lot better and as said we are going in circles because you can't admit that we have a better Defense. Your team is better, no problem there, you offense is lightyears ahead of our offense of last year, but while both D's were good we were better, plain and simple, we were better
Why are you trying to converse reasonably with this dude?
He's convinced that the Skins D is the best. You're not going to change his mind and he's not going to change yours. You're all just talking in circles.
The Eagles defense let up garbage yards...not to mention the yards and points given up in the last 2 games of the season last year when the 2nd and 3rd stringers were playing.
Oh man, you're looking dumber and dumber with these stats you keep throwing out. Give it up, really.
Quote from: jeffreyjpa on August 28, 2005, 11:45:09 AM
RE: your opinion that the Eagles defense would be horrible without the Eagles offense...at which defensive positions do you think the taterskins are better?
Thank you for a civil explaination. My fault horrible is allittle strong.
NOw to say what is better, Very few fans claim that we have the strongest players in the league. It is hard to compete against your entire backfield going to the probowl. but the only part of our D that is truly better is the coaching. Greg Williams is why we are good.
We do have our Washington,Springs, griffin, taylor and such.
But you also had your Kearse, trotter, dawkins, Lewis and such.
We can rival to have the best Defense in a division in the league. The only one that i feel that touches us is the AFC north but with Cowboys set to have a good D and the both of us improving we have strong defenses in the division.
Lets's see...
-(My quote) Haven't had a winning record anywhere near the Reid era for the Eagles; -
(Response) we still hold the series lead over you guys
(Counter) - "Series lead" means very little in the present scheme. Also, your record against Reid is not all that great.
- (My Quote)Only seem to sell out games when FedEx field turns into Lincoln Financial South;
(Response) sorry, every home game was sold out last season, we set an attendance record at the home opener vs. the bucs with 91,000 fans
(Counter) - How many of those sellout games were close to all taterskin fans? I've seem to read a whole lot of stories on taterskin MBs about "the lack of support by Skin fans during the season, mostly from the fans who sell their tickets - mainly because the Skins are not that good, and haven't been for many, many years."
- (My Quote) Having their "All-Pro Defense" burned by the likes of C Johnson, T Small, Pinkston, Thrash, etc.
(Response) more like having a rookie be taugh a lesson, i can't believe you even put pinkston on that list, do i need to show the clip where he deliberatly dropped the pass to avoid being slammed by sean taylor last year?
(Counter) - Then how about, to refresh your own memory, in the same game, where Pinky, the same Pinky, burned Smoot and took his lunch money, catches the McNabb bomb, and gets hit by the same Sean Taylor?
- (My Quote) Fight with the Giants and Cowboys for LAST place in the NFC East -
(Reponse) say what you want while you can
(Counter) Grab some popcorn, cop a squat, and take notes. The taterskins have not made any significant steps forward to challenge the Eagles for the NFC East - Every step forward has been accompanied by 2 steps back.
- (My quote) Are still without a bonafide QB, LB Corps, reliable Special Teamers, and IMO a good WR corps;
(Response) still without a bonafide lb corps? wtf are you smoking, we have arrington and washington on the outside, both are pro bowlers, and we have a reliable player in the middle.
(Counter) Took the bait. Your LB corps is full of somewhat talented guys who will never realize their full potential. For one thing, your defensive line is line a sandbag wall waiting to burst. And your defensive schemes, if this happens, expose the LBs quickly. Arrington is the prime example.
- (My quote) Couldn't handle the salary cap to save their lives;
(Response) that's why we've never had a salary cap purge like the titans had, in case you haven't noticed it hasn't been that way the last few years
(Counter) Small consolation for the taterskins. Regardless of whether you have a "cap purge" or not, handling the cap means managing the money properly to field a competitive product. That means not paying Brunnell a ridiculuous signing bonus. That also means not signing a WR to a ridiculuous contract and then trading him AND taking his salary hit, getting another WR and signing HIM to a lavish contract as well. In the present century, the Skins have not finished above .500 at all.
- (My Quote) Have 1 playoff appearance, NO Division Titles, NO Conference Titles in at least the last 8 years;
(Response) yeah that one playoff appearance, we won the division,sorry to burst your bubble.
(Counter) Small consolation:
Since 1994
1994 - (3-13)
1995 - (6-10)
1996 - (9-7)
1997 - (8-7-1)
1998 - (6-10)
1999 - (10-6)
* - On this, having checked, The Skins did win the division.
But there was no bubble to burst. ONE division title. The Eagles have already won 4.
2000 - (8-8)
2001 - (8-8)
2002 - (7-9)
2003 - (5-11)
2004 - (6-10)
But enough time wasted.
Quote from: rjs246 on August 28, 2005, 11:47:31 AM
Why are you trying to converse reasonably with this dude?
He's convinced that the Skins D is the best. You're not going to change his mind and he's not going to change yours. You're all just talking in circles.
because an offensive battle will be just to short?
rjs is right. lets just let others talk if they feel the need to say something later, for now we know everyone's opinion in this group of 4 or 5 people that have been talking and going in circles
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 11:53:13 AM
Greg Williams is why we are good.
Of course he is. Can we all just agree on that and end this retarded conversation? Williams is a great coordinator. Jim Johnson is also exceptional but Williams is great.
There. Please shut up, you're all giving me a headache.
- (My Quote) Having their "All-Pro Defense" burned by the likes of C Johnson, T Small, Pinkston, Thrash, etc.
(Response) more like having a rookie be taugh a lesson, i can't believe you even put pinkston on that list, do i need to show the clip where he deliberatly dropped the pass to avoid being slammed by sean taylor last year?
(Counter) - Then how about, to refresh your own memory, in the same game, where Pinky, the same Pinky, burned Smoot and took his lunch money, catches the McNabb bomb, and gets hit by the same Sean Taylor?
Let us refresh memories
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI09_ClumsyDeepPass.mpg
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI03_PinkstonHearsFootsteps.mpg
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI10_McNabbVsLitter.mpg
all are from
http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php &threadid=84625
I hope all you Skin fans can stop on by after the Eagles obliterate your team. Y'all come back now...hea...?
I wonder if any of these guys are old enough to remember the last time the Skins actually won a game against the Eagles.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 12:01:38 PM
- (My Quote) Having their "All-Pro Defense" burned by the likes of C Johnson, T Small, Pinkston, Thrash, etc.
(Response) more like having a rookie be taugh a lesson, i can't believe you even put pinkston on that list, do i need to show the clip where he deliberatly dropped the pass to avoid being slammed by sean taylor last year?
(Counter) - Then how about, to refresh your own memory, in the same game, where Pinky, the same Pinky, burned Smoot and took his lunch money, catches the McNabb bomb, and gets hit by the same Sean Taylor?
Let us refresh memories
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI09_ClumsyDeepPass.mpg
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI03_PinkstonHearsFootsteps.mpg
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI10_McNabbVsLitter.mpg
all are from
http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php &threadid=84625
refresh my memory...who won that game?
The good news for the Skins is that their offense is pretty much unstoppable also, what with James Thrash in the slot and an offensive line that isn't at all overpaid or overrated. Additionally, Gregg Williams is such a good coordinator that he won't need decent, healthy CB's to stop passing attacks. He can just scheme for it.
I like the Skins chances to finish 14-2 this year.
When I say "like", I mean it's amusing and fun to think about odds like 39,495,000:1.
....and that's still with the two losses coming to the 15-1 Eagles.
Quote from: MDS on August 28, 2005, 12:09:02 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 12:01:38 PM
- (My Quote) Having their "All-Pro Defense" burned by the likes of C Johnson, T Small, Pinkston, Thrash, etc.
(Response) more like having a rookie be taugh a lesson, i can't believe you even put pinkston on that list, do i need to show the clip where he deliberatly dropped the pass to avoid being slammed by sean taylor last year?
(Counter) - Then how about, to refresh your own memory, in the same game, where Pinky, the same Pinky, burned Smoot and took his lunch money, catches the McNabb bomb, and gets hit by the same Sean Taylor?
Let us refresh memories
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI09_ClumsyDeepPass.mpg
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI03_PinkstonHearsFootsteps.mpg
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI10_McNabbVsLitter.mpg
all are from
http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php &threadid=84625
refresh my memory...who won that game?
Exactly. And I'm curious. Where is Sean Taylor...now?
Quote from: rjs246 on August 28, 2005, 11:10:31 AM
The people on this site understand football better than the fans on any message board I've ever been to. They also happen to be Eagles fans. You're not going to get a whole ot of respect here because your team is garbage and your fans are completely incapable of seeing that. To be treated as an intelligent fan of a rival team you must first aknowledge that Skins fans (stereotypically) have no grasp of the depths their team has sunk to before any of us will give you the smallest bit of credit. I have lots of friends who are Skins fans since I spent most of my adult life living around DC, and I can tell you that only one of them has any sort of realistic outlook on the team. I win lots of money betting against the Skins from the other ones. It's like some disease that resides in the DC Metro area's drinking water. You're all incapable of recognizing your pile of shtein football team for what it is, even though there is over a decade's worth of evidence at your disposal to prove it.
The fact of the matter is that the taterskins are terrible and have been for the entire Dan Snyder reign. There doesn't appear to be any light at the end of the tunnel either as they continuously fumble through every offseason and have no hope of ever putting a consistant product on the field while Snyder is the owner. So either start there, prove that you aren't an idiot, or expect everyone here to treat you like a typical delusional skins fan nitwit.
we may disagree on some things, but being a fan of a rival team doesn't mean that i'm a worthless piece of trash. the team i may root for may not be the best, but that isn't a reason to disrespect me. I agree on the facts that my team hasn't been good, hell, they haven't been average the past couple seasons. The only bright spot i have to look forward to is our defense. I don't represent the opinions of other skins fans, i have my own opinions, which differ from there. realistically, i see my team winning 7 to 8 games at the most, which isn't that great. the only reason we might have that number is because our defense keeps us in games. it's up to our offense, to get up to par. that is a task which we have failed miserably at the last couple of years. who knows, right now i'm thinking it could happen again, but i have reason to believe it might not happen again, based on the changes that have happened within the running game, it's more suited to portis' style. i could be wrong, i might be wrong, but hey, i'm not perfect. right now, i see the taterskins still as a 6-10 team, no better, no worse. that's all we can expect to be until someone steps up. i have been able to maintain friendships with cowboy fans better than some taterskin fans i know. just because i root for an opposite team doesn't mean i can't coexist peacefully with fans of other teams.
ahhhhhhhhh!
An editor's complete nightmare.
ahhhh!
an illiterate person's complete nightmare
Quote from: Catapult on August 28, 2005, 12:44:55 PM
Quote from: MDS on August 28, 2005, 12:09:02 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 12:01:38 PM
- (My Quote) Having their "All-Pro Defense" burned by the likes of C Johnson, T Small, Pinkston, Thrash, etc.
(Response) more like having a rookie be taugh a lesson, i can't believe you even put pinkston on that list, do i need to show the clip where he deliberatly dropped the pass to avoid being slammed by sean taylor last year?
(Counter) - Then how about, to refresh your own memory, in the same game, where Pinky, the same Pinky, burned Smoot and took his lunch money, catches the McNabb bomb, and gets hit by the same Sean Taylor?
Let us refresh memories
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI09_ClumsyDeepPass.mpg
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI03_PinkstonHearsFootsteps.mpg
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI10_McNabbVsLitter.mpg
all are from
http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php &threadid=84625
refresh my memory...who won that game?
Exactly. And I'm curious. Where is Sean Taylor...now?
Camp?
if you are referring to him and jail, he still hasn't gone to trial that is sure to last a while, trial probally won't take place till after the season.
"Where is sean taylor....now?" If you really were refering to him and jail you don't follow much football do you?
If you were not referring to that. please elaborate
Quote from: mooby on August 28, 2005, 12:56:33 PM
ahhhh!
an illiterate person's complete nightmare
me = editor
you clearly = illiterate person
Thanks.
illiterate means not being able to read or write. something of which i have already proven i can.
me: clearly not biased ignorant blind eagles fan
you: see above, change clearly not to clearly is.
Try utilizing capital letters and the concept of paragraphs and perhaps I'll consider something you post worthwhile.
Thanks.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 28, 2005, 01:04:43 PM
Try utilizing capital letters and the concept of paragraphs and perhaps I'll consider something you post worthwhile.
Thanks.
Sorry, i didn't know i was in the vincinity of grammer nazi's. Next time I'll make sure I take that advice, so I can get my point across.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 12:56:45 PM
Quote from: Catapult on August 28, 2005, 12:44:55 PM
Quote from: MDS on August 28, 2005, 12:09:02 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 12:01:38 PM
- (My Quote) Having their "All-Pro Defense" burned by the likes of C Johnson, T Small, Pinkston, Thrash, etc.
(Response) more like having a rookie be taugh a lesson, i can't believe you even put pinkston on that list, do i need to show the clip where he deliberatly dropped the pass to avoid being slammed by sean taylor last year?
(Counter) - Then how about, to refresh your own memory, in the same game, where Pinky, the same Pinky, burned Smoot and took his lunch money, catches the McNabb bomb, and gets hit by the same Sean Taylor?
Let us refresh memories
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI09_ClumsyDeepPass.mpg
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI03_PinkstonHearsFootsteps.mpg
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI10_McNabbVsLitter.mpg
all are from
http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php &threadid=84625
refresh my memory...who won that game?
Exactly. And I'm curious. Where is Sean Taylor...now?
Camp?
if you are referring to him and jail, he still hasn't gone to trial that is sure to last a while, trial probally won't take place till after the season.
"Where is sean taylor....now?" If you really were refering to him and jail you don't follow much football do you?
If you were not referring to that. please elaborate
His arraignment is set for a September. And why don't you bring up the clip where Pinkston stiff-arms Sean Taylor for a first down, which was actually a critical play.
Quote from: Larry on August 28, 2005, 02:11:38 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 12:56:45 PM
Quote from: Catapult on August 28, 2005, 12:44:55 PM
Quote from: MDS on August 28, 2005, 12:09:02 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 12:01:38 PM
- (My Quote) Having their "All-Pro Defense" burned by the likes of C Johnson, T Small, Pinkston, Thrash, etc.
(Response) more like having a rookie be taugh a lesson, i can't believe you even put pinkston on that list, do i need to show the clip where he deliberatly dropped the pass to avoid being slammed by sean taylor last year?
(Counter) - Then how about, to refresh your own memory, in the same game, where Pinky, the same Pinky, burned Smoot and took his lunch money, catches the McNabb bomb, and gets hit by the same Sean Taylor?
Let us refresh memories
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI09_ClumsyDeepPass.mpg
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI03_PinkstonHearsFootsteps.mpg
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI10_McNabbVsLitter.mpg
all are from
http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php &threadid=84625
refresh my memory...who won that game?
Exactly. And I'm curious. Where is Sean Taylor...now?
Camp?
if you are referring to him and jail, he still hasn't gone to trial that is sure to last a while, trial probally won't take place till after the season.
"Where is sean taylor....now?" If you really were refering to him and jail you don't follow much football do you?
If you were not referring to that. please elaborate
His arraignment is set for a September. And why don't you bring up the clip where Pinkston stiff-arms Sean Taylor for a first down, which was actually a critical play.
you mean this clip it is the first game, I always thought it was funny looking at a picture of this and looked like Pinkston did good, but in acutality pinkston was pushed out of bounds
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week11atPHI08_BlindRef.mpg
from this site
http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php &threadid=82456
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 02:21:19 PM
Quote from: Larry on August 28, 2005, 02:11:38 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 12:56:45 PM
Quote from: Catapult on August 28, 2005, 12:44:55 PM
Quote from: MDS on August 28, 2005, 12:09:02 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 12:01:38 PM
- (My Quote) Having their "All-Pro Defense" burned by the likes of C Johnson, T Small, Pinkston, Thrash, etc.
(Response) more like having a rookie be taugh a lesson, i can't believe you even put pinkston on that list, do i need to show the clip where he deliberatly dropped the pass to avoid being slammed by sean taylor last year?
(Counter) - Then how about, to refresh your own memory, in the same game, where Pinky, the same Pinky, burned Smoot and took his lunch money, catches the McNabb bomb, and gets hit by the same Sean Taylor?
Let us refresh memories
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI09_ClumsyDeepPass.mpg
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI03_PinkstonHearsFootsteps.mpg
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI10_McNabbVsLitter.mpg
all are from
http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php &threadid=84625
refresh my memory...who won that game?
Exactly. And I'm curious. Where is Sean Taylor...now?
Camp?
if you are referring to him and jail, he still hasn't gone to trial that is sure to last a while, trial probally won't take place till after the season.
"Where is sean taylor....now?" If you really were refering to him and jail you don't follow much football do you?
If you were not referring to that. please elaborate
His arraignment is set for a September. And why don't you bring up the clip where Pinkston stiff-arms Sean Taylor for a first down, which was actually a critical play.
you mean this clip it is the first game, I always thought it was funny looking at a picture of this and looked like Pinkston did good, but in acutality pinkston was pushed out of bounds
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week11atPHI08_BlindRef.mpg
I love the quote button!!
We can go round and round about defense all day long. It really doesn't matter which team has the better statistical defense. It doesn't matter which defense has the most probowl players. The only thing that matter is the final score at the end of the game. Who wins? Be it because of offense, defense or special teams. Who wins the most games? Who has the better TEAM? From Ownership all the way down to the beer vendors, the Eagles have proven to be the best in the division and conference for the last 5 years. Stats are good but the score is the only thing that matters. And last year the Eagles outscored their opponents 386 - 260 while the taterskins were outscored 240 - 265. Also, keep in mind that of those 260 points 58 of them were given up in the final 2 weeks of the season when the Eagles didn't play their starters.
So for all of the Skins fans here who want to argue about how stout the defense is, go right ahead. It's a good defense, I won't deny that. Too bad it's going to waste because there isn't a hint of offensive talent on that team other than Portis. Enjoy fighting for second place in the division again this year suckas.
Quote
You mean this clip it is the first game, I always thought it was funny looking at a picture of this and looked like Pinkston did good, but in acutality pinkston was pushed out of bounds
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week11atPHI08_BlindRef.mpg
from this site
http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php &threadid=82456
No excuses. Sean Taylor should be able to tackle someone 75 lb. lighter than him.
That was a 3rd down play. We scored on that drive making it 20-6 and putting the game out of reach.
Taylor blew it.
Wow. I have never seen so many Skins fans jump so hard to point out Pinkston's plays. Now...will the starting QB in Game 1 of the regular season be the same starter by Game 16?
Quote from: Larry on August 28, 2005, 03:12:16 PM
Quote
You mean this clip it is the first game, I always thought it was funny looking at a picture of this and looked like Pinkston did good, but in acutality pinkston was pushed out of bounds
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week11atPHI08_BlindRef.mpg
from this site
http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php &threadid=82456
No excuses. Sean Taylor should be able to tackle someone 75 lb. lighter than him.
That was a 3rd down play. We scored on that drive making it 20-6 and putting the game out of reach.
Taylor blew it.
Taylor got shoved off by Pinkston's stiff arm, and there is not definitive evidence on that tape that any part of Pinkston's foot was out of bounds. Whichever call was made on the field would have been held up there. It's as close as it comes. After all, you have to remember that Pinkston wears a AAAAA width shoe.
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 28, 2005, 03:19:10 PM
Quote from: Larry on August 28, 2005, 03:12:16 PM
Quote
You mean this clip it is the first game, I always thought it was funny looking at a picture of this and looked like Pinkston did good, but in acutality pinkston was pushed out of bounds
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week11atPHI08_BlindRef.mpg
from this site
http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php &threadid=82456
No excuses. Sean Taylor should be able to tackle someone 75 lb. lighter than him.
That was a 3rd down play. We scored on that drive making it 20-6 and putting the game out of reach.
Taylor blew it.
Taylor got shoved off by Pinkston's stiff arm, and there is not definitive evidence on that tape that any part of Pinkston's foot was out of bounds. Whichever call was made on the field would have been held up there. It's as close as it comes. After all, you have to remember that Pinkston wears a AAAAA width shoe.
To go with his AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA body. :)
Quote from: General_Failure on August 27, 2005, 11:34:45 PM
Quote from: archer on August 27, 2005, 10:42:23 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on August 27, 2005, 02:14:02 PM
Wow. The Skins won a preseason game with a vanilla gameplan against a nearly undefeated team from last season that surely brought out every trick they had. Cower's offensive genius was no match for Gibbs and whoever the farg is running that defense.
Skins defense is better than iggles, IMO.
Your opinion isn't worth the toilet paper it's normally written on.
you are truly a cunning linguist
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 06:53:37 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on August 27, 2005, 11:34:45 PM
Quote from: archer on August 27, 2005, 10:42:23 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on August 27, 2005, 02:14:02 PM
Wow. The Skins won a preseason game with a vanilla gameplan against a nearly undefeated team from last season that surely brought out every trick they had. Cower's offensive genius was no match for Gibbs and whoever the farg is running that defense.
Skins defense is better than iggles, IMO.
Your opinion isn't worth the toilet paper it's normally written on.
you are truly a cunning linguist
Thank you, Moneypenny.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on August 28, 2005, 01:01:45 AM
Hey archer...
Go farg yourself.
How's the 1 playoff appearence in 13 years feel? Oh sure you can go back and jerkoff to Gibbs' past SB victories but you sound like a Cowboys fan bringing up the past.
Here's some news for you, jackhole...
Gibbs is done. He is overmatched. Thank your lucky charms for Gregg Williams because without him you would be in SF 49ers territory of 1-2 wins.
Gibbs, Cerrato and Snyder are colossal farg ups. Gibbs was good in the 80's and early 90's...but in this era of NFL football he is cooked.
So I hope you enjoy Snyder pumping you in your ass to go to that zesty stadium to watch a lousy football team.
Enjoy your 4-5 wins this year, clown.
Are you the same guy who booed when the Eagles picked McNabb in the draft?
Quote from: mooby on August 28, 2005, 08:09:38 AM
i am a taterskins fan from another board. before you sit here and try dis me, all i want is to have an intelligent, peaceful conversation with some hopefully intelligent people on these boards. from what i've seen in this threads is a bunch of ignorant fans. please prove me wrong.
Your not wrong, they call them 700 level fans around these parts
Quote from: shorebird on August 28, 2005, 12:05:54 PM
I hope all you Skin fans can stop on by after the Eagles obliterate your team. Y'all come back now...hea...?
I wonder if any of these guys are old enough to remember the last time the Skins actually won a game against the Eagles.
You honestly think the Eagles are going to "obliterate" the Skins? I mean, we totally shut down every offensive weapon you had last year, that's not going to change this year, what is going to change is that our offense is going to be alot more productive. I think both games will be close, just trying to keep it real. ;D
Did anyone ever mention that taterskins.com owns ExtremeSkins now? :paranoid
Link from 3 weeks ago (http://www.taterskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=8749)
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 27, 2005, 10:34:36 AM
someone needs to send this to that wiggaz site:
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y256/Ashlo1/DTC/prezceomayor.jpg)
I didn't know the skins had a "peoples champ too"
Quote from: phillymic2000 on August 28, 2005, 07:04:43 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 27, 2005, 10:34:36 AM
someone needs to send this to that wiggaz site:
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y256/Ashlo1/DTC/prezceomayor.jpg)
I didn't know the skins had a "peoples champ too"
Looks almost as good as the idiot you have in the stands with shoulder pads on and his face painted!!
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 06:55:32 PM
Are you the same guy who booed when the Eagles picked McNabb in the draft?
Ignoramus.
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 07:09:52 PM
Looks almost as good as the idiot you have in the stands with shoulder pads on and his face painted!!
What's really funny is you're probably waiting for one of us to run and defend him. We all agree, he is an idiot.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 28, 2005, 07:09:54 PM
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 06:55:32 PM
Are you the same guy who booed when the Eagles picked McNabb in the draft?
Ignoramus.
Phreak didn't boo McNabb, but he did boo Santa and cheer when Irvin was hurt.
Phreak wasn't even a glimmer of hope in his parents' eyes yet when Santa was booed, dopey Sailor boy.
;)
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 28, 2005, 07:16:11 PM
Phreak wasn't even a glimmer of hope in his parents' eyes for the Santa thing, dopey Sailor boy.
;)
No shtein Sherlock ;)
I forgot to add the time he threw batteries at J.D. Drew :evil
Didn't he pee on a nun too?
I shot off a flare gun, so THERE.
Taylor had the desired outcome, he pushed him out. No way was he in, it is a joke to say that he was in, if you can't admit this you are all just being to big of homers. Seems like to many of you have looked at that picture and thought it to be an amazing play, you all have built up this imagined play by looking at a freeze frame. he was out.
I'm not sure how you can watch the clip you posted and say that so definitively, like he was a foot out of bounds. To me, it looks too close to call (as someone mentioned earlier, maybe FF)...with that replay, the call on the field would need to stand, whichever way the officials had originally called it.
Jesus, this thread is farging retarded. Skins fans talking shtein is a joke until they prove they can do anything remotely threatening. Until then it's all wishful thinking. Stop entertaining their fantasies as though they are legitimate fer chrissakes.
Take a look at Dawkins game ending interception last year in the skins game. Watch it frame by frame, the ball hit the ground before he had control, we'll give you the win, we won't this year ;D
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 10:32:58 PM
Take a look at Dawkins game ending interception last year in the skins game. Watch it frame by frame, the ball hit the ground before he had control, we'll give you the win, we won't this year ;D
:-D I love the skins fan responses. RJS your right there is something in the water
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on August 28, 2005, 10:37:27 PM
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 10:32:58 PM
Take a look at Dawkins game ending interception last year in the skins game. Watch it frame by frame, the ball hit the ground before he had control, we'll give you the win, we won't this year ;D
:-D I love the skins fan responses. RJS your right there is something in the water
I'll try and find the link
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 10:47:14 PM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on August 28, 2005, 10:37:27 PM
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 10:32:58 PM
Take a look at Dawkins game ending interception last year in the skins game. Watch it frame by frame, the ball hit the ground before he had control, we'll give you the win, we won't this year ;D
:-D I love the skins fan responses. RJS your right there is something in the water
I'll try and find the link
You're still crying about last season? :-D What a loser.
Us 13-3 NFC Champs
You 6-10 Tied for last place
We've beaten you 8 out of the last 10 games or something crazy like that. Your team sucks, Gibbs is tainting his legacy, Snyder is a farging moron. Happy?
first off that is why we think ramsey makes horrible choices sometimes, that was an INT,even if it wasn't no differense for either team. It didn't touch the ground, it was bobbled but it was an INT. taterskins need ramsey to make better decisions or we aren't going no where. Most fans know that our season is in the hands of Ramsey. That was an INT and it was a farging dumb pass by ramsey.
Okay, I'm a taterskins fan so I suppose you all will discount my views as being a "homer". That's fine but I'm gonna say what's on my mind nonetheless.
For those of you that think the Skins will finish 6-10, 7-9, you just don't have a whole lot of football "smarts". The taterskins have revamped their offense, have a great upgrade at WR which will spread the field, will run a more wide-open running attack that will fully utilize Portis and Chris Cooley will make the Pro Bowl this year...just wait and see. In a nutshell, this offense is gonna hurt people.
On defense, the Skins really didnt' lose much in Pierce and Smoot. Pierce was a 2nd-string player that got called to duty and played admirably all year. He won't do that 2 years in a row. Smoot gives too much cushion to WRs so I wasn't sorry to see him go at all.
Someone told me (and I may certainly be wrong) that if the taterskins averaged just 20 points/game last year on offense, they would have finished 12-4 or 11-5. Were they that good last year? Absolutely not. Will they be that good this year? Absolutely not.
I will say with a lot of confidence that I expect at least a 9-7 year from this team this year....and I certainly wouldn't be surprised if they finished 10-6.
Look for the taterskins to give the Eagles two very hard fought games this year. I, for one, hope all of you fans (as well as the Eagles players) discount the Skins. If you do, boy will you be in for a rude awakening.
Quote from: rjs246 on August 28, 2005, 09:36:38 PM
Jesus, this thread is farging retarded. Skins fans talking shtein is a joke until they prove they can do anything remotely threatening.
You're not threatened by these guys? They will so bust a cap in yo' ass and drive off in their Volkswagen Cabriolet.
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y256/Ashlo1/DTC/prezceomayor.jpg)
IF our offense improves there is little we can not do, Eagle fans i wnat an outside view what is messed up on our team player wise. No shtein about snyder or salary cap, what on the field is messed up. Ramsey is the only thing in my opinion and he will improve.
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 10:47:14 PM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on August 28, 2005, 10:37:27 PM
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 10:32:58 PM
Take a look at Dawkins game ending interception last year in the skins game. Watch it frame by frame, the ball hit the ground before he had control, we'll give you the win, we won't this year ;D
:-D I love the skins fan responses. RJS your right there is something in the water
I'll try and find the link
Here's the link, slow it down at the end and tell me that it should'nt have been challenged! :paranoid
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI19_RamseyWTF.mpg
Quote from: Justice Hog on August 28, 2005, 11:01:59 PM
Okay, I'm a taterskins fan so I suppose you all will discount my views as being a "homer". That's fine but I'm gonna say what's on my mind nonetheless.
For those of you that think the Skins will finish 6-10, 7-9, you just don't have a whole lot of football "smarts". The taterskins have revamped their offense, have a great upgrade at WR which will spread the field, will run a more wide-open running attack that will fully utilize Portis and Chris Cooley will make the Pro Bowl this year...just wait and see. In a nutshell, this offense is gonna hurt people.
On defense, the Skins really didnt' lose much in Pierce and Smoot. Pierce was a 2nd-string player that got called to duty and played admirably all year. He won't do that 2 years in a row. Smoot gives too much cushion to WRs so I wasn't sorry to see him go at all.
Someone told me (and I may certainly be wrong) that if the taterskins averaged just 20 points/game last year on offense, they would have finished 12-4 or 11-5. Were they that good last year? Absolutely not. Will they be that good this year? Absolutely not.
I will say with a lot of confidence that I expect at least a 9-7 year from this team this year....and I certainly wouldn't be surprised if they finished 10-6.
Look for the taterskins to give the Eagles two very hard fought games this year. I, for one, hope all of you fans discount the Skins as well as the Eagles. If you do, boy will you be in for a rude awakening.
I remember seeing a similar post in
2000,
2001,
2002,
2003, 2004 :)
Quote from: Justice Hog on August 28, 2005, 11:01:59 PM
On defense, the Skins really didnt' lose much in Pierce and Smoot. Pierce was a 2nd-string player that got called to duty and played admirably all year. He won't do that 2 years in a row. Smoot gives too much cushion to WRs so I wasn't sorry to see him go at all.
you've got to be shteinting me.
Last year, Pierce was so farging good that he made Trotter look like a waste in Skinsland. All Skins fans talked about was how Trotter sucked and that Pierce was 500 times the MLB Trotter EVER was or would be. AND that he was younger....AND that his knees were great. You all slobbered over Pierce so much it made the rest of us all sick.
And Smoot? LMFAO...NOW he sucks? LOL...we've been telling Skins fans that for years. But all we got in return was that he was better than anyone on our secondary. ::)
Don't act like the is our first time on the big, ole, world wide web. :-D We've been reading skinsfan bullshtein for years. Don't backpedal. You look like an ass.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 11:01:16 PM
first off that is why we think ramsey makes horrible choices sometimes, that was an INT,even if it wasn't no differense for either team. It didn't touch the ground, it was bobbled but it was an INT. taterskins need ramsey to make better decisions or we aren't going no where. Most fans know that our season is in the hands of Ramsey. That was an INT and it was a farging dumb pass by ramsey.
check it out, slow it down, was not an int, should have been challenged:
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI19_RamseyWTF.mpg
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 11:07:32 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 11:01:16 PM
first off that is why we think ramsey makes horrible choices sometimes, that was an INT,even if it wasn't no differense for either team. It didn't touch the ground, it was bobbled but it was an INT. taterskins need ramsey to make better decisions or we aren't going no where. Most fans know that our season is in the hands of Ramsey. That was an INT and it was a farging dumb pass by ramsey.
check it out, slow it down, was not an int, should have been challenged:
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI19_RamseyWTF.mpg
LOL, Skins fans arguing now. On OUR board. LMFAO
And PS...He tucked the ball under his arm before he hit the ground. Not bobbling it. It was not even CLOSE to being a bad call. It was an interception.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 28, 2005, 11:07:23 PM
Quote from: Justice Hog on August 28, 2005, 11:01:59 PM
On defense, the Skins really didnt' lose much in Pierce and Smoot. Pierce was a 2nd-string player that got called to duty and played admirably all year. He won't do that 2 years in a row. Smoot gives too much cushion to WRs so I wasn't sorry to see him go at all.
you've got to be shteinting me.
Last year, Pierce was so farging good that he made Trotter look like a waste in Skinsland. All Skins fans talked about was how Trotter sucked and that Pierce was 500 times the MLB Trotter EVER was or would be. AND that he was younger....AND that his knees were great. You all slobbered over Pierce so much it made the rest of us all sick.
And Smoot? LMFAO...NOW he sucks? LOL...we've been telling Skins fans that for years. But all we got in return was that he was better than anyone on our secondary. ::)
Don't act like the is our first time on the big, ole, world wide web. :-D We've been reading skinsfan bullshtein for years. Don't backpedal. You look like an ass.
They're the most delusional fans on the planet
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 28, 2005, 11:10:46 PM
And PS...He tucked the ball under his arm before he hit the ground. Not bobbling it. It was not even CLOSE to being a bad call. It was an interception.
The ball hit the ground, didnt tuck, look at it frame by frame at end of video
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 11:12:09 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 28, 2005, 11:10:46 PM
And PS...He tucked the ball under his arm before he hit the ground. Not bobbling it. It was not even CLOSE to being a bad call. It was an interception.
The ball hit the ground, didnt tuck, look at it frame by frame at end of video
Dumb AND blind. Great combination.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 11:05:00 PM
IF our offense improves there is little we can not do,
The offense has no choice but to improve seeing as it's unpossible to have points taken away.
QuoteEagle fans i wnat an outside view what is messed up on our team player wise. No shtein about snyder or salary cap, what on the field is messed up. Ramsey is the only thing in my opinion and he will improve.
Well, first off you really can't criticize a team without starting at the top. And Snyder has run that team into the ground. During his ownership there has been too many personal and coaching moves which makes it hard to build any type of continuity. The way to win in the NFL is through the draft and developing talent from within while adding a few key players through free agency. The Skins are doing it completely backwards by signing everyone available and then drafting a few players with the picks they have left.
I'm not going to say that Gibbs is done and that the game has passed him by, but there sure were a lot of times last season where Gibbs just flat out looked lost. How long until Danny boy grows tired of his new toy and goes shopping for a new one?
As for the players. Ramsey sucks. He's done so stick a fork in him. Santana Moss and David Patten are both decent receivers but undersized and neither one of them is suited to be a #1. Portis and John Jansen are about the only 2 players on the offensive side of the ball worth keeping. Cut the rest and start over from scratch.
Ramsey sucks. Period. Non-delusional Skins fans know this. He's NOT getting any better. Quit trying to convince actual football fans that. If he were an Eagle I'd be calling for Reid's head that he was starting. He's the Bobby Hoying (without the fanfare) of the Skins.
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 11:07:32 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 11:01:16 PM
first off that is why we think ramsey makes horrible choices sometimes, that was an INT,even if it wasn't no differense for either team. It didn't touch the ground, it was bobbled but it was an INT. taterskins need ramsey to make better decisions or we aren't going no where. Most fans know that our season is in the hands of Ramsey. That was an INT and it was a farging dumb pass by ramsey.
check it out, slow it down, was not an int, should have been challenged:
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI19_RamseyWTF.mpg
Guess what jackass. The play happened after the 2 minute warning so the coaches couldn't challenge. If the replay booth felt that it needed to be looked at, they would have buzzed the ref. Bottom line is that it was an interception, no doubt about it. Go back to eating paint chips.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 28, 2005, 11:07:23 PM
Quote from: Justice Hog on August 28, 2005, 11:01:59 PM
On defense, the Skins really didnt' lose much in Pierce and Smoot. Pierce was a 2nd-string player that got called to duty and played admirably all year. He won't do that 2 years in a row. Smoot gives too much cushion to WRs so I wasn't sorry to see him go at all.
you've got to be shteinting me.
Last year, Pierce was so farging good that he made Trotter look like a waste in Skinsland. All Skins fans talked about was how Trotter sucked and that Pierce was 500 times the MLB Trotter EVER was or would be. AND that he was younger....AND that his knees were great. You all slobbered over Pierce so much it made the rest of us all sick.
And Smoot? LMFAO...NOW he sucks? LOL...we've been telling Skins fans that for years. But all we got in return was that he was better than anyone on our secondary. ::)
Don't act like the is our first time on the big, ole, world wide web. :-D We've been reading skinsfan bullshtein for years. Don't backpedal. You look like an ass.
First of all, if you knew me (which you don't and I don't expect you to take the time to), you would know that I'm not one of those fans that love people one minute and trash them when they leave.
I always hated Smoot. The guy couldn't cover a bed with a blanket. I was glad to see him leave. I did like Pierce a lot. He played with a lot of heart and intensity...but he just played over his head. I think the law of averages will catch up to him this year...and he won't have as impressive of year this year as last year. Just my (unfortunately large) gut telling me that.
Regarding Trotter, yes he absolutely sucked in the taterskins scheme. I had hoped he would come around but he never did. He is obviously much better suited for the Eagles defensive scheme...and he is now playing for a team that will enable him to play to his potential.
As for backpedaling, that's something I don't do. Unlike your views of a lot of taterskins fans (sounds like you think we're all clueless), I'm not one of those fans. I'm a realist. Will the Eagles beat us twice this year? Probably....but I wouldn't bet the house on it.
Like it or not, the Skins have improved this year...and you're gonna see it. Just "how much" they've improved is the question to be answered. It's exciting for me to see, however.
And to those of you that say you've seen similar taterskins fans posts in 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, you're just generalizing things way too much. Sure, as all fans, we are all optimistic at the beginning of each year and we will certainly post messages that reflect that optimism. I can say that the Eagles have failed their fans in 2001-2002-2003-2004, but that would be too easy.
The Eagles are still the team to beat in the NFC East. That's for sure. Just don't be surprised if/when you see an up-and-coming taterskins team give you problems.
Again, all of that novella you just typed out? Same old shtein as every single year.
IF (and that's a big IF) there is a team that might give the Eagles a bit of a problem in one of the games this year, it sure isn't going to be the Skins. Dallas might end up being the one team we don't beat by 10 or more points.
And that again, is a HUGE if.
Quote from: Justice Hog on August 28, 2005, 11:21:08 PM
Will the Eagles beat us twice this year? Probably....but I wouldn't bet the house on it.
Would you bet $5? I know some people who would take that bet :)
Quote from: Justice Hog on August 28, 2005, 11:21:08 PM
Just don't be surprised if/when you see an up-and-coming taterskins team give you problems.
How is your team 'Up and coming'? Your owner doesn't believe in building through the draft and he blows at managing your cap. He's a 'win now' type of guy. Why else do you think he'd bring Mr. Nascar back? (BTW--I think he'll of had enough after another abysmal season and call it quits...JMO)
I will tell you that General Failure is a welcome guest at the message board where I post. I see that there is a reason I have so few posts over here. All of you are too passionate to see reality yourselves.
You fans think taterskins fans are clueless and are blinded by our hope year and and year out. Eagles fans cannot accept the fact that their team just may not be the best in the NFC and other teams just may challenge them.
Hear me now...and feel free to tape this to your PC, the taterskins WILL BEAT the Eagles one time this year. If the Eagles somehow manage to sweep the Skins, feel free to come over to THEHOGS.NET and blast me.
Otherwise, I'm outta hear. I think if I stay around too much longer, my IQ will drop dramatically by the company I'm keeping.
Quote from: Justice Hog on August 28, 2005, 11:36:52 PM
You fans think taterskins fans are clueless and are blinding by our hope year and and year out.
For the most part, they are. Just like every other team's fans. There's even a few Eagles fans that think Pinkston and Trotter are good players.
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 28, 2005, 11:17:30 PM
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 11:07:32 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 11:01:16 PM
first off that is why we think ramsey makes horrible choices sometimes, that was an INT,even if it wasn't no differense for either team. It didn't touch the ground, it was bobbled but it was an INT. taterskins need ramsey to make better decisions or we aren't going no where. Most fans know that our season is in the hands of Ramsey. That was an INT and it was a farging dumb pass by ramsey.
check it out, slow it down, was not an int, should have been challenged:
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI19_RamseyWTF.mpg
Guess what jackass. The play happened after the 2 minute warning so the coaches couldn't challenge. If the replay booth felt that it needed to be looked at, they would have buzzed the ref. Bottom line is that it was an interception, no doubt about it. Go back to eating paint chips.
No need for name calling! Play it SLLOOOWWW, you know like your brain speed, he did'nt even have feet down while trying to maintain control, terrible call. Get your head out of Reid's ass and take a look, genious. ;D
Quote from: Justice Hog on August 28, 2005, 11:36:52 PM
I will tell you that General Failure is a welcome guest at the message board where I post.
He's a sell out :P
i have seen it but my only point is it doesn't make a damn differense anyways, i mean all we can do is evaluate preformances, we have to look at each idividual play as its own and say good or bad for Ramsey. Regardless of whether or not that was an INT that was the worst choice to make. Ramsey skrewed up, don't get me wrong i am always supporting Ramsey but that was just plain stupid. After it leaves Ramsey's hands his job is done, and he did a bad job regardless. I see what you mean but it was within 2 minutes and it had to be booth review, but even if we won it would mean very little for both teams.
We played well against you guys by the way.
Quote from: SD_Eagle on August 28, 2005, 11:39:54 PM
Quote from: Justice Hog on August 28, 2005, 11:36:52 PM
I will tell you that General Failure is a welcome guest at the message board where I post.
He's a sell out :P
He's not a sell out. He just has the ability, unlike the rest of you, to create posts with intelligence. He can talk football "facts" without being clouded by passion. He also has a someone skewed sense of reality which is always refreshing.
You know what else is fun that I do? I whine and bitch when I don't like the direction a topic is going over there instead of leaving it alone.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 11:40:12 PM
i have seen it but my only point is it doesn't make a damn differense anyways, i mean all we can do is evaluate preformances, we have to look at each idividual play as its own and say good or bad for Ramsey. Regardless of whether or not that was an INT that was the worst choice to make. Ramsey skrewed up, don't get me wrong i am always supporting Ramsey but that was just plain stupid. After it leaves Ramsey's hands his job is done, and he did a bad job regardless. I see what you mean but it was within 2 minutes and it had to be booth review, but even if we won it would mean very little for both teams.
We played well against you guys by the way.
You're right it does'nt make a difference, just trying to fire the boys up, it's all in good fun, just like this thread :yay
Quote from: General_Failure on August 28, 2005, 11:45:09 PM
You know what else is fun that I do? I whine and bitch when I don't like the direction a topic is going over there instead of leaving it alone.
He's a cunning linguist, I'll say that :-D
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on August 27, 2005, 10:31:47 AM
Here's some pics of them...check out the 7th pic down (http://deadtreecrew.proboards30.com/index.cgi?board=SOC&action=display&thread=1117635664)
Backwards jersey's....WWE belts...hilarious!
Those dudes are the biggest douche bags ever.
I can't get on extremeskins any more bacuse I've owned that dude Art one too many times about the Skins and he can't take it. There are a lot of Eagles homers but at least most of us admit when someone screws up. That guy thinks everything the Skisn do is golden.
Those pictures are too much.
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 11:39:26 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 28, 2005, 11:17:30 PM
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 11:07:32 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 11:01:16 PM
first off that is why we think ramsey makes horrible choices sometimes, that was an INT,even if it wasn't no differense for either team. It didn't touch the ground, it was bobbled but it was an INT. taterskins need ramsey to make better decisions or we aren't going no where. Most fans know that our season is in the hands of Ramsey. That was an INT and it was a farging dumb pass by ramsey.
check it out, slow it down, was not an int, should have been challenged:
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI19_RamseyWTF.mpg
Guess what jackass. The play happened after the 2 minute warning so the coaches couldn't challenge. If the replay booth felt that it needed to be looked at, they would have buzzed the ref. Bottom line is that it was an interception, no doubt about it. Go back to eating paint chips.
No need for name calling! Play it SLLOOOWWW, you know like your brain speed, he did'nt even have feet down while trying to maintain control, terrible call. Get your head out of Reid's ass and take a look, genious. ;D
:-D That's because his knee was on the ground you moron. Knee=Feet. Stop the replay at 39 seconds.
But regardless of that because it is your perception vs my perception which really doesn't count for shtein. The replay booth saw the play and watched the replay. If they felt it was a questionable call they would have buzzed the ref and told him to take another look at it. So the people who get PAID to review these plays and determine if they should be reviewed or not felt that it was a good call on the field. Therefore, it was in fact, an interception. Cry about it all you want to but it's not going to change anything.
You didn't mention Carlos Perez in that post. I'm ashamed of you.
Quote from: Justice Hog on August 28, 2005, 11:01:59 PM
For those of you that think the Skins will finish 6-10, 7-9, you just don't have a whole lot of football "smarts". The taterskins have revamped their offense, have a great upgrade at WR which will spread the field, will run a more wide-open running attack that will fully utilize Portis and Chris Cooley will make the Pro Bowl this year...just wait and see. In a nutshell, this offense is gonna hurt people.
Hahaha. I forgot that the offseason if the favorite time of year for Skins fans.
Quote from: Justice Hog on August 28, 2005, 11:44:00 PM
He's not a sell out. He just has the ability, unlike the rest of you, to create posts with intelligence. He can talk football "facts" without being clouded by passion. He also has a someone skewed sense of reality which is always refreshing.
That sounds nothing like the GF who posts here as nothing he posts is intelligent nor based on fact. You're obviously confused. ;)
"Trotter sucks" is not only intelligent and based on fact, but it's entertaining too. Hoyda.
Quote from: General_Failure on August 28, 2005, 11:58:50 PM
"Trotter sucks" is not only intelligent and based on fact, but it's entertaining too. Hoyda.
No wonder they love you over there. :P
They love me over there because I'm not the guy that has to tell them they're all retards. So shut up retard. :flipoff
Quote from: Justice Hog on August 28, 2005, 11:36:52 PM
Otherwise, I'm outta hear. I think if I stay around too much longer, my IQ will drop dramatically by the company I'm keeping.
Wow, that's good for a laugh right there. THanks.
Quote from: General_Failure on August 28, 2005, 11:38:27 PM
Quote from: Justice Hog on August 28, 2005, 11:36:52 PM
You fans think taterskins fans are clueless and are blinding by our hope year and and year out.
For the most part, they are. Just like every other team's fans. There's even a few Eagles fans that think Pinkston and Trotter are good players.
Fight me now.
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 11:39:26 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 28, 2005, 11:17:30 PM
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 11:07:32 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 11:01:16 PM
first off that is why we think ramsey makes horrible choices sometimes, that was an INT,even if it wasn't no differense for either team. It didn't touch the ground, it was bobbled but it was an INT. taterskins need ramsey to make better decisions or we aren't going no where. Most fans know that our season is in the hands of Ramsey. That was an INT and it was a farging dumb pass by ramsey.
check it out, slow it down, was not an int, should have been challenged:
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI19_RamseyWTF.mpg
Guess what jackass. The play happened after the 2 minute warning so the coaches couldn't challenge. If the replay booth felt that it needed to be looked at, they would have buzzed the ref. Bottom line is that it was an interception, no doubt about it. Go back to eating paint chips.
No need for name calling! Play it SLLOOOWWW, you know like your brain speed, he did'nt even have feet down while trying to maintain control, terrible call. Get your head out of Reid's ass and take a look, genious. ;D
Guess what? If your brain dead QB didn't try to force the ball in there we wouldn't be having this discussion now would we?
Patrick Ramsey = Not a good QB.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on August 29, 2005, 01:20:35 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on August 28, 2005, 11:38:27 PM
Quote from: Justice Hog on August 28, 2005, 11:36:52 PM
You fans think taterskins fans are clueless and are blinding by our hope year and and year out.
For the most part, they are. Just like every other team's fans. There's even a few Eagles fans that think Pinkston and Trotter are good players.
Fight me now.
(http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/twentieth_century_fox/shallow_hal/jack_black/halpre3.jpg)
With karate I'll kick your ass
Here to Tiennamen Square.
Oh yeah, muthafarga,
I'm 'onna kick your fargin' derriere.
You broke the rules,
Now I'll pull out all your pubic hair,
You muthafarga.
You muthafarga.
:-D
ha!
I like Lenny P because he hates the taterskins....from today's chat. Freudian slip by Len? :-D
QuoteMLeavey (Owings Mills): Okay Len, I'll bite. Your crazy. What does Mr. Nutjob think about Ray Lewis this season? He's been talking up league MVP honors. Can he make it happen?
Len Pasquarelli: based on what i saw in the scrimmage against the deadskins, the guy could be a holy terror again . . . i think it really helps him going back to the 4-3, because he doesn't have to take on blockers as much and can run to the ball . . . also, i think he'll be very effective as a blitzer this year, and will set a career high for sacks
I heard about that, lenny p. was taking a crack at the taterskins because some immature members of extremeskins were hounding his chat with fat jokes, and shtein about him. I think it's stupid to laugh at his weight problem, one guy asked him what's his beef with the taterskins and he completly avoided the question, saying something about how he likes his beef new york - medium rare or some shtein like that.
Quote from: mooby on August 29, 2005, 04:49:45 PM
some immature members of extremeskins
Please, be more specific. That doesn't exactly narrow it down.
Dead Tree Crew in da house bitchez!
some immature members. i don't know, i go there, but it's not my fav taterskins place to chat at. go there and read the thread they posted, it's like 3 pages long, and it has to do with pastabelly's chat.
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 04:53:04 PM
Quote from: mooby on August 29, 2005, 04:49:45 PM
some immature members of extremeskins
Please, be more specific. That doesn't exactly narrow it down.
:-D
Art is now writing articles for taterskins.com giving the "fans" take on the Skins. :-D
Here's his first crock of shtein kissing the ground that Gibbs, Cerato and Snyder walk on: Heereee (http://www.taterskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=9630)
QuoteIf the taterskins actually decide to string a few wins together here early in the season, we're done talking about having the best offensive line since the Hogs. When winning starts, we're starting the chatter about having the best offensive line EVER.
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 28, 2005, 11:17:30 PM
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 11:07:32 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 11:01:16 PM
first off that is why we think ramsey makes horrible choices sometimes, that was an INT,even if it wasn't no differense for either team. It didn't touch the ground, it was bobbled but it was an INT. taterskins need ramsey to make better decisions or we aren't going no where. Most fans know that our season is in the hands of Ramsey. That was an INT and it was a farging dumb pass by ramsey.
check it out, slow it down, was not an int, should have been challenged:
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI19_RamseyWTF.mpg
Guess what jackass. The play happened after the 2 minute warning so the coaches couldn't challenge. If the replay booth felt that it needed to be looked at, they would have buzzed the ref. Bottom line is that it was an interception, no doubt about it. Go back to eating paint chips.
You mean the same refs that blew this call?
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI05_PassInterference.mpg
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on August 29, 2005, 01:22:16 PM
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 11:39:26 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 28, 2005, 11:17:30 PM
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 11:07:32 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 11:01:16 PM
first off that is why we think ramsey makes horrible choices sometimes, that was an INT,even if it wasn't no differense for either team. It didn't touch the ground, it was bobbled but it was an INT. taterskins need ramsey to make better decisions or we aren't going no where. Most fans know that our season is in the hands of Ramsey. That was an INT and it was a farging dumb pass by ramsey.
check it out, slow it down, was not an int, should have been challenged:
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI19_RamseyWTF.mpg
Guess what jackass. The play happened after the 2 minute warning so the coaches couldn't challenge. If the replay booth felt that it needed to be looked at, they would have buzzed the ref. Bottom line is that it was an interception, no doubt about it. Go back to eating paint chips.
No need for name calling! Play it SLLOOOWWW, you know like your brain speed, he did'nt even have feet down while trying to maintain control, terrible call. Get your head out of Reid's ass and take a look, genious. ;D
Guess what? If your brain dead QB didn't try to force the ball in there we wouldn't be having this discussion now would we?
Patrick Ramsey = Not a good QB.
I agree it was a terrible throw, but he's not a bad qb, he's never really had a solid chance with a true nfl offense. He'll get his shot this year, he should get some decent protection, let's reserve judgement until about week 8, that should give us an indication of his talents.
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on August 23, 2005, 04:42:16 PM
I don't need a legitimate reason to laugh at the taterskins or their delusional, sissybitch fans.
I laugh at them because they're simply the most clueless collection of candyasses I've ever come across and their bizarre hero worship of a fossil like Joe Gibbs is annoying at best and downright pathetic at worst.
Farg them and the horse they collectively rode in on.
:)
What I said.
:-D
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 08:48:18 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on August 29, 2005, 01:22:16 PM
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 11:39:26 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 28, 2005, 11:17:30 PM
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 11:07:32 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 11:01:16 PM
first off that is why we think ramsey makes horrible choices sometimes, that was an INT,even if it wasn't no differense for either team. It didn't touch the ground, it was bobbled but it was an INT. taterskins need ramsey to make better decisions or we aren't going no where. Most fans know that our season is in the hands of Ramsey. That was an INT and it was a farging dumb pass by ramsey.
check it out, slow it down, was not an int, should have been challenged:
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI19_RamseyWTF.mpg
Guess what jackass. The play happened after the 2 minute warning so the coaches couldn't challenge. If the replay booth felt that it needed to be looked at, they would have buzzed the ref. Bottom line is that it was an interception, no doubt about it. Go back to eating paint chips.
No need for name calling! Play it SLLOOOWWW, you know like your brain speed, he did'nt even have feet down while trying to maintain control, terrible call. Get your head out of Reid's ass and take a look, genious. ;D
Guess what? If your brain dead QB didn't try to force the ball in there we wouldn't be having this discussion now would we?
Patrick Ramsey = Not a good QB.
I agree it was a terrible throw, but he's not a bad qb, he's never really had a solid chance with a true nfl offense. He'll get his shot this year, he should get some decent protection, let's reserve judgement until about week 8, that should give us an indication of his talents.
I actually agree with you here, from what I have seen of Ramsey he does throw the ball well. His problem has been lack of protection and a very short leash.
Hey, I wanted to clear up a few things here. There is a lot of misinformation being spread in this thread:
FACTS:
1. The taterskins defense gave up less points than the Philly D did last year. Overall the taterskins AS A TEAM gave up 265 points last year while the Eagles gave up 260. However, Philly had one TD scored against it because of an int. Six TDs were scored against the 'Skins while the defense was not on the field (one PR, one KR, one int, and three fumbles). So, therefore, the Eagles D surrendered 253 pts or 15.8 pts/game, and the 'Skins D only gave up 223 pts (tied with the Steelers for least in the league) or 13.9 pts/game. Therefore, statistically the taterskins defense was better than the Philly D in EVERY statistical category.
2. Many people in this thread have attacked 'Skins fans who said that Gregg Williams set Carlos Rogers up to get beat deep. Well, those of you who said that those fans were being delusional obviously know very little about Gregg Williams. He was in fact trying to expose Rogers as much as possible. This is what he has always done and he said he would do it before the game! I couldn't find a quote from this year but here's one from last year:
Quotetaterskins defensive coordinator Gregg Williams told us before the Rams game that he wanted rookie safety Sean Taylor to get beat deep a couple of times against the Rams. Say what? But Williams said that Taylor did not have enough respect for the speed of NFL receivers and he wanted the Rams to run by him a couple of times. Williams wanted Taylor to learn this lesson in the preseason instead of on opening day.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/7639648
Or how about this from the Carolina game two weeks ago when our entire secondary was held out because of injuries:
QuoteThe taterskins gave up 28 points to Carolina last week, but Williams said the chance to see young players against the Panthers' first two units was ideal.
"From an evaluation standpoint, we couldn't have scripted it any better," he said. "I always laugh and shake my head when people try to make an opinion on somebody that plays at the end of preseason games against somebody that won't make an NFL team. You have to play against NFL-type players. We had a chance to move guys up and get them in those situations, and you'll see it again [tonight]."
http://washingtontimes.com/sports/20050819-125544-4629r.htm
In addition, the day BEFORE the Cincy game this thread was started, Don't Trash Carlos Rogers Too Much (http://www.thehogs.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=14654&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0). Anyone who has ever actively followed Gregg Williams knows that this is how he brings rookies into the league, we all knew what was going to happen before the game even happened. So don't be so hostile to the fans that wrote that stuff, they actually know a lot more than you ignorant haters.
3. The taterskins offense is completely different than last year. Last year we couldn't move the ball, period. Our passing game was particularly poor. This preseason we have the number two passing offense and our two starting recievers are both averaging over 19 yds/catch so that certainly shows improvement. The entire offense has being completely revamped. Don't say Gibbs is past it because he has made a lot of changes. Anyone who is old enough will remember that the thing that really set him apart was his ability to learn and adapt to any situation. You can't say that a guy who has been away for 12 years has lost it after one season. Just wait and see what our offense is like this year.
Our running game is also much better. Against Cincy and Pittsburg (last year's number one run defense in total yards given up - of course WE gave up the least yds/carry thought) we rushed for over 5 yds/carry. Against Pittsburg we ran for over 100yds in the first half against their first string D. In the previous two games against you and Miami they gave up 26 yards of rushing in the first halves of those two games combined! In both of those games the first string D came out before the half thus making it easier to rack up rushing yards too. Our o-line also gave up a total of ZERO sacks against Carolina and Pittsburg, two of the best pass-rushing teams in football. Of course, all of this is preseason, I'm just trying to give you a head's up that the offense has changed a great deal, this isn't the same dink and dunk O we had last year.
4. The taterskins have sold out every game for the last 38 years, the longest streak in the NFL, and they do it with by far the biggest stadium in football. Your arguments about 'Skins fans make no sense. If someone supports their team they're a blind homer but then if they sell their tickets they aren't real fans. Wow, great logic there.
5. The main problem I have about this thread though is that you all just want to rub it in everyone's faces. You guys are better, I'll give you that - probably the best team in the NFL. The 'Skins have been a very poor team for many years, fine. But still, you're so uncivil and abusive. Nobody likes a bad winner. In fact, if you're going to trash us, why don't I trash you. So here are some facts. We've won three SBs, how many have you won?
You may say I'm clinging onto history but I don't think so. Right now, in the present, you guys can't win despite being rated as the best team in the NFC every year. What's up with that guys? You're not even the Buffalo Bills! At least they MADE it to the SB four times in a row. Last year you doubled your total of SB appearences. Face it, you can't win when it's important, can you, and that just makes you the most visable losers in the country. Every year, everyone in the country points and laughs at you because you always fail on the biggest stage. Every year, we are the offseason winners WHILE YOU ARE THE POSTSEASON LOSERS! :-D And yet, you're so proud of yourselves. Awesome, you guys are $15 million under the cap, good job. Why don't you stop being so damn cheap and try to actually win sometime! Being cheap isn't something to be proud of.
In fact, now I understand why you like to point and laugh. It's because you're so insecure with yourselves. You can't actually win the big one so instaed you need to laugh at organizations who have to make yourselves feel better about your ultimate failure.
Nice post. You do, however, fail to realize that your team still does not have the goods to reach the playoffs, let alone do any damage there. Have the Eagles failed to win a Super Bowl thus far? Sure, but from top to bottom, the organization has a much better chance to do it.
As a Penn State fan, I know how difficult it can be to admit the coach you love and has given you success is old, stubborn, and has let the game pass him by. You'll get there soon enough, though.
The bottom line from 2004 --> 2005 is that the taterskins did not improve as a team. The offensive line should be slightly less like swiss cheese, but Samuels is still overrated, and Rabach and Jensen are the only ones that can really get the job done. Outside of that, the team did not improve as a unit or at any given position. Instead of choosing to do so, they traded up for a quarterback... one that had no business getting taken in the first round.
Even if you don't want to admit it to yourself and spend the better part of the evening researching statistics to help you believe otherwise, your team sucks and will suck for the foreseeable future.
Quote from: hkHog on August 29, 2005, 09:32:25 PM
Hey, I wanted to clear up a few things here. There is a lot of misinformation being spread in this thread:
FACTS:
1. The taterskins defense gave up less points than the Philly D did last year. Overall the taterskins AS A TEAM gave up 265 points last year while the Eagles gave up 260. However, Philly had one TD scored against it because of an int. Six TDs were scored against the 'Skins while the defense was not on the field (one PR, one KR, one int, and three fumbles). So, therefore, the Eagles D surrendered 253 pts or 15.8 pts/game, and the 'Skins D only gave up 223 pts (tied with the Steelers for least in the league) or 13.9 pts/game. Therefore, statistically the taterskins defense was better than the Philly D in EVERY statistical category.
2. Many people in this thread have attacked 'Skins fans who said that Gregg Williams set Carlos Rogers up to get beat deep. Well, those of you who said that those fans were being delusional obviously know very little about Gregg Williams. He was in fact trying to expose Rogers as much as possible. This is what he has always done and he said he would do it before the game! I couldn't find a quote from this year but here's one from last year:
Quotetaterskins defensive coordinator Gregg Williams told us before the Rams game that he wanted rookie safety Sean Taylor to get beat deep a couple of times against the Rams. Say what? But Williams said that Taylor did not have enough respect for the speed of NFL receivers and he wanted the Rams to run by him a couple of times. Williams wanted Taylor to learn this lesson in the preseason instead of on opening day.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/7639648
Or how about this from the Carolina game two weeks ago when our entire secondary was held out because of injuries:
QuoteThe taterskins gave up 28 points to Carolina last week, but Williams said the chance to see young players against the Panthers' first two units was ideal.
"From an evaluation standpoint, we couldn't have scripted it any better," he said. "I always laugh and shake my head when people try to make an opinion on somebody that plays at the end of preseason games against somebody that won't make an NFL team. You have to play against NFL-type players. We had a chance to move guys up and get them in those situations, and you'll see it again [tonight]."
http://washingtontimes.com/sports/20050819-125544-4629r.htm
In addition, the day BEFORE the Cincy game this thread was started, Don't Trash Carlos Rogers Too Much (http://www.thehogs.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=14654&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0). Anyone who has ever actively followed Gregg Williams knows that this is how he brings rookies into the league, we all knew what was going to happen before the game even happened. So don't be so hostile to the fans that wrote that stuff, they actually know a lot more than you ignorant haters.
3. The taterskins offense is completely different than last year. Last year we couldn't move the ball, period. Our passing game was particularly poor. This preseason we have the number two passing offense and our two starting recievers are both averaging over 19 yds/catch so that certainly shows improvement. The entire offense has being completely revamped. Don't say Gibbs is past it because he has made a lot of changes. Anyone who is old enough will remember that the thing that really set him apart was his ability to learn and adapt to any situation. You can't say that a guy who has been away for 12 years has lost it after one season. Just wait and see what our offense is like this year.
Our running game is also much better. Against Cincy and Pittsburg (last year's number one run defense in total yards given up - of course WE gave up the least yds/carry thought) we rushed for over 5 yds/carry. Against Pittsburg we ran for over 100yds in the first half against their first string D. In the previous two games against you and Miami they gave up 26 yards of rushing in the first halves of those two games combined! In both of those games the first string D came out before the half thus making it easier to rack up rushing yards too. Our o-line also gave up a total of ZERO sacks against Carolina and Pittsburg, two of the best pass-rushing teams in football. Of course, all of this is preseason, I'm just trying to give you a head's up that the offense has changed a great deal, this isn't the same dink and dunk O we had last year.
4. The taterskins have sold out every game for the last 38 years, the longest streak in the NFL, and they do it with by far the biggest stadium in football. Your arguments about 'Skins fans make no sense. If someone supports their team they're a blind homer but then if they sell their tickets they aren't real fans. Wow, great logic there.
5. The main problem I have about this thread though is that you all just want to rub it in everyone's faces. You guys are better, I'll give you that - probably the best team in the NFL. The 'Skins have been a very poor team for many years, fine. But still, you're so uncivil and abusive. Nobody likes a bad winner. In fact, if you're going to trash us, why don't I trash you. So here are some facts. We've won three SBs, how many have you won?
You may say I'm clinging onto history but I don't think so. Right now, in the present, you guys can't win despite being rated as the best team in the NFC every year. What's up with that guys? You're not even the Buffalo Bills! At least they MADE it to the SB four times in a row. Last year you doubled your total of SB appearences. Face it, you can't win when it's important, can you, and that just makes you the most visable losers in the country. Every year, everyone in the country points and laughs at you because you always fail on the biggest stage. Every year, we are the offseason winners WHILE YOU ARE THE POSTSEASON LOSERS! :-D And yet, you're so proud of yourselves. Awesome, you guys are $15 million under the cap, good job. Why don't you stop being so damn cheap and try to actually win sometime! Being cheap isn't something to be proud of.
In fact, now I understand why you like to point and laugh. It's because you're so insecure with yourselves. You can't actually win the big one so instaed you need to laugh at organizations who have to make yourselves feel better about your ultimate failure.
:o :yay :paranoid
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 09:38:54 PM
Nice post. You do, however, fail to realize that your team still does not have the goods to reach the playoffs, let alone do any damage there. Have the Eagles failed to win a Super Bowl thus far? Sure, but from top to bottom, the organization has a much better chance to do it.
As a Penn State fan, I know how difficult it can be to admit the coach you love and has given you success is old, stubborn, and has let the game pass him by. You'll get there soon enough, though.
The bottom line from 2004 --> 2005 is that the taterskins did not improve as a team. The offensive line should be slightly less like swiss cheese, but Samuels is still overrated, and Rabach and Jensen are the only ones that can really get the job done. Outside of that, the team did not improve as a unit or at any given position. Instead of choosing to do so, they traded up for a quarterback... one that had no business getting taken in the first round.
Even if you don't want to admit it to yourself and spend the better part of the evening researching statistics to help you believe otherwise, your team sucks and will suck for the foreseeable future.
But they DID improve as a team, where do you get off saying they did'nt? The offense is better, you will not be able to stop Portis, we are running plays that fit his slash and cut style, have Betts to get the tough yards. Our recievers caught more passes over 20 yards this preseason, than they did ALL of last season. Are you paying attention, it's not the same offense, maybe not as good as yours but it will still be much improved.
Let me translate:
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 09:40:42 PM
:o
"I can't believe you spend all this time doing this! Wow! You must NEVER get any poosay."
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 09:40:42 PM
:yay
"As a taterskins fan, I feel the need to support you with a hearty thumbs up."
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 09:40:42 PM
:paranoid
"Although... like I said, you really must not get laid much, and even with all those quotes and resources and the fact that I'm a fellow taterskins fan, I'm still not convinced."
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 09:38:54 PM
Nice post. You do, however, fail to realize that your team still does not have the goods to reach the playoffs, let alone do any damage there. Have the Eagles failed to win a Super Bowl thus far? Sure, but from top to bottom, the organization has a much better chance to do it.
As a Penn State fan, I know how difficult it can be to admit the coach you love and has given you success is old, stubborn, and has let the game pass him by. You'll get there soon enough, though.
The bottom line from 2004 --> 2005 is that the taterskins did not improve as a team. The offensive line should be slightly less like swiss cheese, but Samuels is still overrated, and Rabach and Jensen are the only ones that can really get the job done. Outside of that, the team did not improve as a unit or at any given position. Instead of choosing to do so, they traded up for a quarterback... one that had no business getting taken in the first round.
Even if you don't want to admit it to yourself and spend the better part of the evening researching statistics to help you believe otherwise, your team sucks and will suck for the foreseeable future.
We lost eight games by an average of 2.5 points. We don't have to be much better to make the playoffs. I still view Philly as the best team in the NFC and I think you guys have what it takes to win it all this year but I don't see why we can't easily be a wild card this year. Let's just wait and see what happens.
Sorry, I got a little riled up and cranky in my first post. Just don't hold the taterskins fans responsable for the actions of Dan Snyder. A lot of us don't like him either. Joe Gibbs is trying to undo the damage but he has obviously hurt us a lot with his big spending. The team will be a lot better this year as now Gibbs has had a year to get the personnel he wants around him. The D will still be good and the offensive scheme has changed.
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 08:39:16 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 28, 2005, 11:17:30 PM
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 11:07:32 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 11:01:16 PM
first off that is why we think ramsey makes horrible choices sometimes, that was an INT,even if it wasn't no differense for either team. It didn't touch the ground, it was bobbled but it was an INT. taterskins need ramsey to make better decisions or we aren't going no where. Most fans know that our season is in the hands of Ramsey. That was an INT and it was a farging dumb pass by ramsey.
check it out, slow it down, was not an int, should have been challenged:
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI19_RamseyWTF.mpg
Guess what jackass. The play happened after the 2 minute warning so the coaches couldn't challenge. If the replay booth felt that it needed to be looked at, they would have buzzed the ref. Bottom line is that it was an interception, no doubt about it. Go back to eating paint chips.
You mean the same refs that blew this call?
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI05_PassInterference.mpg
Bad call by the ref. How much more crying are you going to do about shtein that happened last year? I see the point you're getting at though. The refs obviously have it out for the Skins and will use any opportunity that presents itself to ensure that the Skins don't win. ::)
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 09:45:33 PM
But they DID improve as a team, where do you get off saying they did'nt? The offense is better, you will not be able to stop Portis, we are running plays that fit his slash and cut style, have Betts to get the tough yards. Our recievers caught more passes over 20 yards this preseason, than they did ALL of last season. Are you paying attention, it's not the same offense, maybe not as good as yours but it will still be much improved.
Where do I "get off" saying they didn't? Dude, I just spit beer out my nose. You're a crack-up.
Portis will all-of-the-sudden be unstoppable, unlike last year when he proved to be more of a system back playing out of his system and behind a garbage-tastic OL. I see. That's almost as salient about your confidence in Ladell Betts to "get the tough yards" (personally, I would buy stock in Rock Cartwright instead).
But I guess where the Eagles are really screwed is with your WR's. After all, it's well-known that the Eagles have one of the worst and least athletic secondaries in all of football... and with the stellar pre-season performances by the likes of Santana Moss, Dave Patten, and James Thrash, it's only going to accentuate how bad Sheppard, Brown, Dawkins, and Lewis really are. By the way, which top-shelf signal caller will be throwing to those receivers, and does it matter?
I am paying attention. I didn't say the taterskins had the same offense. I said they didn't improve. Keep in mind that Rod Gardner and Lavuerneus Coles both were effective against the Eagles. Gardner's size created a mismatch with our corners, but that problem is solved now that all your WR's are shrimp. Coles made plays simply because his route-running and overall WR skills are far better than anyone Washington will bring to the table this year.
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 09:45:41 PM
Let me translate:
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 09:40:42 PM
:o
"I can't believe you spend all this time doing this! Wow! You must NEVER get any poosay."
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 09:40:42 PM
:yay
"As a taterskins fan, I feel the need to support you with a hearty thumbs up."
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 09:40:42 PM
:paranoid
"Although... like I said, you really must not get laid much, and even with all those quotes and resources and the fact that I'm a fellow taterskins fan, I'm still not convinced."
Man you guys are rude and vulgar over here, did you fall out of the 700 level? ;D
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 09:52:41 PM
Man you guys are rude and vulgar over here, did you fall out of the 700 level? ;D
In our minds when you come to our boards, it's like the 700 level. If you get up, I'm going to piss on your seat.
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 09:51:57 PM
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 09:45:33 PM
But they DID improve as a team, where do you get off saying they did'nt? The offense is better, you will not be able to stop Portis, we are running plays that fit his slash and cut style, have Betts to get the tough yards. Our recievers caught more passes over 20 yards this preseason, than they did ALL of last season. Are you paying attention, it's not the same offense, maybe not as good as yours but it will still be much improved.
Where do I "get off" saying they didn't? Dude, I just spit beer out my nose. You're a crack-up.
Portis will all-of-the-sudden be unstoppable, unlike last year when he proved to be more of a system back playing out of his system and behind a garbage-tastic OL. I see. That's almost as salient about your confidence in Ladell Betts to "get the tough yards" (personally, I would buy stock in Rock Cartwright instead).
But I guess where the Eagles are really screwed is with your WR's. After all, it's well-known that the Eagles have one of the worst and least athletic secondaries in all of football... and with the stellar pre-season performances by the likes of Santana Moss, Dave Patten, and James Thrash, it's only going to accentuate how bad Sheppard, Brown, Dawkins, and Lewis really are. By the way, which top-shelf signal caller will be throwing to those receivers, and does it matter?
I am paying attention. I didn't say the taterskins had the same offense. I said they didn't improve. Keep in mind that Rod Gardner and Lavuerneus Coles both were effective against the Eagles. Gardner's size created a mismatch with our corners, but that problem is solved now that all your WR's are shrimp. Coles made plays simply because his route-running and overall WR skills are far better than anyone Washington will bring to the table this year.
Can we agree to disagree? By the way, Moss seems much more effective than broken-toed Coles. Your secondary is slightly overrated as well, decent, but overrated.
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 29, 2005, 09:50:36 PM
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 08:39:16 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 28, 2005, 11:17:30 PM
Quote from: archer on August 28, 2005, 11:07:32 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 28, 2005, 11:01:16 PM
first off that is why we think ramsey makes horrible choices sometimes, that was an INT,even if it wasn't no differense for either team. It didn't touch the ground, it was bobbled but it was an INT. taterskins need ramsey to make better decisions or we aren't going no where. Most fans know that our season is in the hands of Ramsey. That was an INT and it was a farging dumb pass by ramsey.
check it out, slow it down, was not an int, should have been challenged:
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI19_RamseyWTF.mpg
Guess what jackass. The play happened after the 2 minute warning so the coaches couldn't challenge. If the replay booth felt that it needed to be looked at, they would have buzzed the ref. Bottom line is that it was an interception, no doubt about it. Go back to eating paint chips.
You mean the same refs that blew this call?
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI05_PassInterference.mpg
Bad call by the ref. How much more crying are you going to do about shtein that happened last year? I see the point you're getting at though. The refs obviously have it out for the Skins and will use any opportunity that presents itself to ensure that the Skins don't win. ::)
just tryin to open some eyes, and have a little fun
Quote from: hkHog on August 29, 2005, 09:48:58 PM
We lost eight games by an average of 2.5 points. We don't have to be much better to make the playoffs. I still view Philly as the best team in the NFC and I think you guys have what it takes to win it all this year but I don't see why we can't easily be a wild card this year. Let's just wait and see what happens.
Sorry, I got a little riled up and cranky in my first post. Just don't hold the taterskins fans responsable for the actions of Dan Snyder. A lot of us don't like him either. Joe Gibbs is trying to undo the damage but he has obviously hurt us a lot with his big spending. The team will be a lot better this year as now Gibbs has had a year to get the personnel he wants around him. The D will still be good and the offensive scheme has changed.
There are a lot of close games in the NFL. The good teams win more of them than they lose. Honestly, I think any other team in the NFC East might have the goods one way or another to make a wild card run this year, but you can't blame us as Eagles fans for thinking a wild card run is unexciting. I just don't think the Skins, specifically, are good enough to string together wins against top teams.
I know Dan Snyder has made you all cranky, but I still don't think Joe Gibbs 100% "gets it" in today's NFL. It was his call to make the deal for Campbell, which was just completely bone-headed all around.
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 09:58:21 PM
Quote from: hkHog on August 29, 2005, 09:48:58 PM
We lost eight games by an average of 2.5 points. We don't have to be much better to make the playoffs. I still view Philly as the best team in the NFC and I think you guys have what it takes to win it all this year but I don't see why we can't easily be a wild card this year. Let's just wait and see what happens.
Sorry, I got a little riled up and cranky in my first post. Just don't hold the taterskins fans responsable for the actions of Dan Snyder. A lot of us don't like him either. Joe Gibbs is trying to undo the damage but he has obviously hurt us a lot with his big spending. The team will be a lot better this year as now Gibbs has had a year to get the personnel he wants around him. The D will still be good and the offensive scheme has changed.
There are a lot of close games in the NFL. The good teams win more of them than they lose. Honestly, I think any other team in the NFC East might have the goods one way or another to make a wild card run this year, but you can't blame us as Eagles fans for thinking a wild card run is unexciting. I just don't think the Skins, specifically, are good enough to string together wins against top teams.
I know Dan Snyder has made you all cranky, but I still don't think Joe Gibbs 100% "gets it" in today's NFL. It was his call to make the deal for Campbell, which was just completely bone-headed all around.
You may be making a wild card run yourself, no? Or is the Division Championship a "stone cold mortal lock", like a few of those NFC Championship games you blew?
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 09:58:21 PM
Quote from: hkHog on August 29, 2005, 09:48:58 PM
We lost eight games by an average of 2.5 points. We don't have to be much better to make the playoffs. I still view Philly as the best team in the NFC and I think you guys have what it takes to win it all this year but I don't see why we can't easily be a wild card this year. Let's just wait and see what happens.
Sorry, I got a little riled up and cranky in my first post. Just don't hold the taterskins fans responsable for the actions of Dan Snyder. A lot of us don't like him either. Joe Gibbs is trying to undo the damage but he has obviously hurt us a lot with his big spending. The team will be a lot better this year as now Gibbs has had a year to get the personnel he wants around him. The D will still be good and the offensive scheme has changed.
There are a lot of close games in the NFL. The good teams win more of them than they lose. Honestly, I think any other team in the NFC East might have the goods one way or another to make a wild card run this year, but you can't blame us as Eagles fans for thinking a wild card run is unexciting. I just don't think the Skins, specifically, are good enough to string together wins against top teams.
I know Dan Snyder has made you all cranky, but I still don't think Joe Gibbs 100% "gets it" in today's NFL. It was his call to make the deal for Campbell, which was just completely bone-headed all around.
We're still trying to figure out the Campbell thing
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 09:56:06 PM
Your secondary is slightly overrated as well, decent, but overrated.
Our best cornerback
didn't make the Pro Bowl, and he was the only one who didn't. With the amount of blitzes Johnson runs and how often the DB's have to cover man-to-man, they do an amazing job. If anything, the secondary is underrated because of how often they're left on an island.
But you wouldn't know that. You think Shawn Springs + Sean Taylor = one of the best secondaries in the NFL.
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 09:59:46 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 09:58:21 PM
Quote from: hkHog on August 29, 2005, 09:48:58 PM
We lost eight games by an average of 2.5 points. We don't have to be much better to make the playoffs. I still view Philly as the best team in the NFC and I think you guys have what it takes to win it all this year but I don't see why we can't easily be a wild card this year. Let's just wait and see what happens.
Sorry, I got a little riled up and cranky in my first post. Just don't hold the taterskins fans responsable for the actions of Dan Snyder. A lot of us don't like him either. Joe Gibbs is trying to undo the damage but he has obviously hurt us a lot with his big spending. The team will be a lot better this year as now Gibbs has had a year to get the personnel he wants around him. The D will still be good and the offensive scheme has changed.
There are a lot of close games in the NFL. The good teams win more of them than they lose. Honestly, I think any other team in the NFC East might have the goods one way or another to make a wild card run this year, but you can't blame us as Eagles fans for thinking a wild card run is unexciting. I just don't think the Skins, specifically, are good enough to string together wins against top teams.
I know Dan Snyder has made you all cranky, but I still don't think Joe Gibbs 100% "gets it" in today's NFL. It was his call to make the deal for Campbell, which was just completely bone-headed all around.
You may be making a wild card run yourself, no?
No 8)
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 09:59:46 PM
You may be making a wild card run yourself, no?
No, we won't.
That would require another team in the NFC East winning 11+ games at a minimum, which is not going to happen.
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 10:00:47 PM
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 09:56:06 PM
Your secondary is slightly overrated as well, decent, but overrated.
Our best cornerback didn't make the Pro Bowl, and he was the only one who didn't. With the amount of blitzes Johnson runs and how often the DB's have to cover man-to-man, they do an amazing job. If anything, the secondary is underrated because of how often they're left on an island.
But you wouldn't know that. You think Shawn Springs + Sean Taylor = one of the best secondaries in the NFL.
You don't agree Taylor Is one of the top safeties in the league? Man, you're just hatin now
I agree Taylor is excellent, and I agree Springs is servicable when he stays healthy. The issue is that there is another starting CB spot, and neither Carlos Rogers or Walt Harris scare me. Also, who's playing the other Safety spot, and does it matter? The Eagles secondary is also deep, with Rod Hood and Matt Ware playing in nickel/dime situations, and Quentin Mikell playing a 3rd Safety spot in goal-line. Mikell would start for the taterskins.
That was a well thought out, intelligent post full of all types of fun facts and figures. Unfortunately you negated all of that with this craptastic finish:
Quote from: hkHog on August 29, 2005, 09:32:25 PM
You may say I'm clinging onto history but I don't think so. Right now, in the present, you guys can't win despite being rated as the best team in the NFC every year. What's up with that guys? You're not even the Buffalo Bills! At least they MADE it to the SB four times in a row. Last year you doubled your total of SB appearences. Face it, you can't win when it's important, can you, and that just makes you the most visable losers in the country. Every year, everyone in the country points and laughs at you because you always fail on the biggest stage. Every year, we are the offseason winners WHILE YOU ARE THE POSTSEASON LOSERS! :-D And yet, you're so proud of yourselves. Awesome, you guys are $15 million under the cap, good job. Why don't you stop being so damn cheap and try to actually win sometime! Being cheap isn't something to be proud of.
In fact, now I understand why you like to point and laugh. It's because you're so insecure with yourselves. You can't actually win the big one so instaed you need to laugh at organizations who have to make yourselves feel better about your ultimate failure.
So if you're done, go back to rooting for your incompetant owner, passed him prime coach, talentless offense, pathetic excuse of a team. The season hasn't even started yet and it's already over for the Skins. Man. That's gotta suck.
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 10:06:52 PM
I agree Taylor is excellent, and I agree Springs is servicable when he stays healthy. The issue is that there is another starting CB spot, and neither Carlos Rogers or Walt Harris scare me. Also, who's playing the other Safety spot, and does it matter? The Eagles secondary is also deep, with Rod Hood and Matt Ware playing in nickel/dime situations, and Quentin Mikell playing a 3rd Safety spot in goal-line. Mikell would start for the taterskins.
The rookie Rogers will be starting at other qb, we may be xposed there, Bowen the other starting safety. Our D is not our problem. Can we agree the Skins may get in the playoffs as wild card, or are you writing them off?
Quote from: hkHog on August 29, 2005, 09:32:25 PM
4. The taterskins have sold out every game for the last 38 years, the longest streak in the NFL, and they do it with by far the biggest stadium in football. Your arguments about 'Skins fans make no sense. If someone supports their team they're a blind homer but then if they sell their tickets they aren't real fans. Wow, great logic there.
I lived in DC for most of my adult life and after college I went to a whole lot of taterskins games (and every game that the Eagles were in town for after college) and I can say without one shred of hyperbole that Redksins fans are not filling the stadium week after week. No stadium in the entire league is as freidnly to visiting fans as FedEx Field. When the Eagles were in town you could hear Philly fans over the Skins fans every single year. Pittsburgh fans are the same. In fact, the only games I ever went to where the visiting fans weren't louder were games that the skins were playing against other non playoff-bound teams.
All of this back and forth is ridiculous. The skins have done nothing to prove they can challenge for the NFC East. In fact, they've done nothing to prove they can challenge for a winning season. Your preseason stats seem to be your only proof positive that they have improved offensively and, call me crazy, but in Spurrier's first preseason the taterskins lead the world in yards and points and meaninglessness. Anything can happen from year to year in the NFL but I and the rest of the football world would be stunned if the taterskins even fight for .500 this year.
Except those back-to-back plays where Rogers was tired and he got beat he has been incredible in the preseason. He is going to be a great player. It doesn't matter who our other safety is, we have a lot of depth at that position. In fact, I would say that we probably have the third best unit in the league behind Baltimore and then Philly.
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:10:23 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 10:06:52 PM
I agree Taylor is excellent, and I agree Springs is servicable when he stays healthy. The issue is that there is another starting CB spot, and neither Carlos Rogers or Walt Harris scare me. Also, who's playing the other Safety spot, and does it matter? The Eagles secondary is also deep, with Rod Hood and Matt Ware playing in nickel/dime situations, and Quentin Mikell playing a 3rd Safety spot in goal-line. Mikell would start for the taterskins.
The rookie Rogers will be starting at other qb, we may be xposed there, Bowen the other starting safety. Our D is not our problem. Can we agree the Skins may get in the playoffs as wild card, or are you writing them off?
I write them off every season, and every season they prove me right. This season? You guessed it, I'm writing them off. Feel free to bump this thread if by some miracle you make the playoffs.
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 29, 2005, 10:09:38 PM
That was a well thought out, intelligent post full of all types of fun facts and figures. Unfortunately you negated all of that with this craptastic finish:
Quote from: hkHog on August 29, 2005, 09:32:25 PM
You may say I'm clinging onto history but I don't think so. Right now, in the present, you guys can't win despite being rated as the best team in the NFC every year. What's up with that guys? You're not even the Buffalo Bills! At least they MADE it to the SB four times in a row. Last year you doubled your total of SB appearences. Face it, you can't win when it's important, can you, and that just makes you the most visable losers in the country. Every year, everyone in the country points and laughs at you because you always fail on the biggest stage. Every year, we are the offseason winners WHILE YOU ARE THE POSTSEASON LOSERS! :-D And yet, you're so proud of yourselves. Awesome, you guys are $15 million under the cap, good job. Why don't you stop being so damn cheap and try to actually win sometime! Being cheap isn't something to be proud of.
In fact, now I understand why you like to point and laugh. It's because you're so insecure with yourselves. You can't actually win the big one so instaed you need to laugh at organizations who have to make yourselves feel better about your ultimate failure.
So if you're done, go back to rooting for your incompetant owner, passed him prime coach, talentless offense, pathetic excuse of a team. The season hasn't even started yet and it's already over for the Skins. Man. That's gotta suck.
I am a firm believer in karma, what comes around goes around, hope I see you on the flip side. Your team is 1 injury away from being worse than ours ::)
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:10:23 PM
The rookie Rogers will be starting at other qb, we may be xposed there, Bowen the other starting safety. Our D is not our problem. Can we agree the Skins may get in the playoffs as wild card, or are you writing them off?
I agree the Skins can do it, only because the last couple NFC spots went to bum teams with no chance to advance last year, and that could end up happening again. The taterskins aren't a real contender, but with some luck, almost any team could MAKE the playoffs.
That said, I wouldn't put money on it.
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:03:45 PM
You don't agree Taylor Is one of the top safeties in the league? Man, you're just hatin now
After one season you're trying to say that Taylor is one of the best in the league?
Jesus, I'm not getting involved in this anymore. I clearly overestimated your ability to reason and make logical points.
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:12:52 PM
I am a firm believer in karma, what comes around goes around, hope I see you on the flip side. Your team is 1 injury away from being worse than ours ::)
And your team is about 7 wins away from being better than ours. :flipoff
Quote from: rjs246 on August 29, 2005, 10:10:52 PM
Quote from: hkHog on August 29, 2005, 09:32:25 PM
4. The taterskins have sold out every game for the last 38 years, the longest streak in the NFL, and they do it with by far the biggest stadium in football. Your arguments about 'Skins fans make no sense. If someone supports their team they're a blind homer but then if they sell their tickets they aren't real fans. Wow, great logic there.
I lived in DC for most of my adult life and after college I went to a whole lot of taterskins games (and every game that the Eagles were in town for after college) and I can say without one shred of hyperbole that Redksins fans are not filling the stadium week after week. No stadium in the entire league is as freidnly to visiting fans as FedEx Field. When the Eagles were in town you could hear Philly fans over the Skins fans every single year. Pittsburgh fans are the same. In fact, the only games I ever went to where the visiting fans weren't louder were games that the skins were playing against other non playoff-bound teams.
All of this back and forth is ridiculous. The skins have done nothing to prove they can challenge for the NFC East. In fact, they've done nothing to prove they can challenge for a winning season. Your preseason stats seem to be your only proof positive that they have improved offensively and, call me crazy, but in Spurrier's first preseason the taterskins lead the world in yards and points and meaninglessness. Anything can happen from year to year in the NFL but I and the rest of the football world would be stunned if the taterskins even fight for .500 this year.
That's because Spurrier played the starters so long, he just loved piling on.
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:12:52 PM
I am a firm believer in karma, what comes around goes around, hope I see you on the flip side. Your team is 1 injury away from being worse than ours ::)
Which 1 injury would that be? We've made the post season without McNabb/TO/Westbrook. Please elaborate.
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:12:52 PM
I am a firm believer in karma, what comes around goes around, hope I see you on the flip side. Your team is 1 injury away from being worse than ours ::)
If that helps you sleep at night, so be it. At least you open the season against the Bears.
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 29, 2005, 10:14:07 PM
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:12:52 PM
I am a firm believer in karma, what comes around goes around, hope I see you on the flip side. Your team is 1 injury away from being worse than ours ::)
And your team is about 7 wins away from being better than ours. :flipoff
Karma dude, karma
I just watched Kelly Clarkson's MTV VMA's performance on MTV.Com.
All I can say is... boyoying.
:-[
PS: The Indigenous Persons are still a fargin laughingstock no matter what statistics their deluded fans dredge up for our amusement.
Bottom line: The Eagles have owned your asses for the better part of this entire decade and will continue to do so until (1) your owner hires a competent personnel staff (2) stops pissing away valuable dollars on over-the-hill has-beens and (3) realizes that this is 2005, not 1985 and hires himself a head coach who hasn't been busy breathing race fumes for the past 10 years.
If you believe in karma, you must in turn believe that Daniel Snyder has farged your whole organization in the pooper.
You're preaching to the wrong chior about Karma. :evil :evil :evil :evil :evil :evil :evil
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 10:16:37 PM
If you believe in karma, you must in turn believe that Daniel Snyder has farged your whole organization in the pooper.
And you probably thought that when Laurie (Spelling?) hired Reid, then Reid picked McNabb......now be honest
Quote from: hkHog on August 29, 2005, 10:14:12 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on August 29, 2005, 10:10:52 PM
I lived in DC for most of my adult life and after college I went to a whole lot of taterskins games (and every game that the Eagles were in town for after college) and I can say without one shred of hyperbole that Redksins fans are not filling the stadium week after week. No stadium in the entire league is as friendly to visiting fans as FedEx Field. When the Eagles were in town you could hear Philly fans over the Skins fans every single year. Pittsburgh fans are the same. In fact, the only games I ever went to where the visiting fans weren't louder were games that the skins were playing against other non playoff-bound teams.
All of this back and forth is ridiculous. The skins have done nothing to prove they can challenge for the NFC East. In fact, they've done nothing to prove they can challenge for a winning season. Your preseason stats seem to be your only proof positive that they have improved offensively and, call me crazy, but in Spurrier's first preseason the taterskins lead the world in yards and points and meaninglessness. Anything can happen from year to year in the NFL but I and the rest of the football world would be stunned if the taterskins even fight for .500 this year.
That's because Spurrier played the starters so long, he just loved piling on.
That's your response to everything I just said? Wow. Stellar point. I can see that we are way overmatched here.
I can't take this. The inability to accept logic and reason is too much. Go back to Extremeskins and fellate Gibbs/Snyder/Lavar/Vinny/Art some more. At least there you won't have people pointing out the numerous holes in your arguments over and over. I, for one, am sick of repeating myself.
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:18:26 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 10:16:37 PM
If you believe in karma, you must in turn believe that Daniel Snyder has farged your whole organization in the pooper.
And you probably thought that when Lurie (Spelling?) hired Reid, then Reid picked McNabb......now be honest
When Lurie picked Reid, I'm pretty sure all of us were like "Who?" I was all about getting McNabb though.
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 29, 2005, 10:20:10 PM
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:18:26 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 10:16:37 PM
If you believe in karma, you must in turn believe that Daniel Snyder has farged your whole organization in the pooper.
And you probably thought that when Lurie (Spelling?) hired Reid, then Reid picked McNabb......now be honest
When Lurie picked Reid, I'm pretty sure all of us were like "Who?" I was all about getting McNabb though.
And your nose is growing so long it's about to hit the monitor :-D
Quote from: rjs246 on August 29, 2005, 10:18:32 PM
I, for one, am sick of repeating myself.
Just start quoting yourself. It saves time and frees up your hands for drinking. :)
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:18:26 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 10:16:37 PM
If you believe in karma, you must in turn believe that Daniel Snyder has farged your whole organization in the pooper.
And you probably thought that when Lurie (Spelling?) hired Reid, then Reid picked McNabb......now be honest
To be honest, I felt this way about those two moves (which is really how most Philly fans felt):
1. Reid: Word was he was a big-time disciple of Holmgren and one of the keys to Favre's success in Green Bay. He had himself a Super Bowl ring, and the Eagles at that point had nowhere to go but up.
2. McNabb: The Eagles needed a quarterback. There was no slicing it any other way. The outspoken fargtards that booed McNabb and wanted Ricky Williams were a vast minority amongst fans. Most fans knew that Duce Staley was a promising runner, but were sick of Bobby Hoying and the Detmers starting games.
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 29, 2005, 10:20:10 PM
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:18:26 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 10:16:37 PM
If you believe in karma, you must in turn believe that Daniel Snyder has farged your whole organization in the pooper.
And you probably thought that when Lurie (Spelling?) hired Reid, then Reid picked McNabb......now be honest
When Lurie picked Reid, I'm pretty sure all of us were like "Who?" I was all about getting McNabb though.
Not to get off the point but, I work with McNabbs #2 wide reciever at Syracuse. Pretty cool, eh.
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:20:58 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 29, 2005, 10:20:10 PM
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:18:26 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 10:16:37 PM
If you believe in karma, you must in turn believe that Daniel Snyder has farged your whole organization in the pooper.
And you probably thought that when Lurie (Spelling?) hired Reid, then Reid picked McNabb......now be honest
When Lurie picked Reid, I'm pretty sure all of us were like "Who?" I was all about getting McNabb though.
And your nose is growing so long it's about to hit the monitor :-D
Doubt it all you want. But I know I was one of the very few who didn't want Ricky Williams in the 99 draft. I hang on to that because it's one of the few things I've ever been right about. Except for the Skins sucking ballz. I'm right about that too.
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:20:58 PM
And your nose is growing so long it's about to hit the monitor :-D
You know. I am proud of our boo-happy reputation, but the dfact that a dozen people boo'ed the McNabb pick and every ignorant douche who hasn't taken the time to read up on anything assumes that every Eagles fan wanted us to pick Ricky Williams is infuriating. Get a farging clue assbag.
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:20:58 PM
And your nose is growing so long it's about to hit the monitor :-D
Yes, you're right. Just as the national sports media (dominated by Washington and NYC writers) would have you believe, the "Dirty 30" that booed McNabb at the draft was not in fact a vocal minority, but actually a representative group of most Eagles fans. You're right to believe that.
Idiot.
Quote from: rjs246 on August 29, 2005, 10:24:07 PM
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:20:58 PM
And your nose is growing so long it's about to hit the monitor :-D
You know. I am proud of our boo-happy reputation, but the dfact that a dozen people boo'ed the McNabb pick and every ignorant douche who hasn't taken the time to read up on anything assumes that every Eagles fan wanted us to pick Ricky Williams is infuriating. Get a farging clue assbag.
It's the same way you call all Skins fans delusional, does'nt feel good does it. This reminds me of preschool
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 29, 2005, 10:23:27 PM
Doubt it all you want. But I know I was one of the very few who didn't want Ricky Williams in the 99 draft. I hang on to that because it's one of the few things I've ever been right about. Except for the Skins sucking ballz. I'm right about that too.
No, because you're also wrong about being one of the "very few", Sarge. Get your pens out of T-hawk's mom for a second, and listen to yourself.
One last word of advice before I hit the sack: Don't drink and post.
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:23:26 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 29, 2005, 10:20:10 PM
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:18:26 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 10:16:37 PM
If you believe in karma, you must in turn believe that Daniel Snyder has farged your whole organization in the pooper.
And you probably thought that when Lurie (Spelling?) hired Reid, then Reid picked McNabb......now be honest
When Lurie picked Reid, I'm pretty sure all of us were like "Who?" I was all about getting McNabb though.
Not to get off the point but, I work with McNabbs #2 wide reciever at Syracuse. Pretty cool, eh.
No it's not cool. In fact, it makes you an even bigger loser because you admit to working with McNabb's #2. You should spend time around N. Davenport. He'll keep you employed for a long, long time. :P
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 10:26:05 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 29, 2005, 10:23:27 PM
Doubt it all you want. But I know I was one of the very few who didn't want Ricky Williams in the 99 draft. I hang on to that because it's one of the few things I've ever been right about. Except for the Skins sucking ballz. I'm right about that too.
No, because you're also wrong about being one of the "very few", Sarge. Get your pens out of T-hawk's mom for a second, and listen to yourself.
One last word of advice before I hit the sack: Don't drink and post.
I saw "very few" because of the general fan attitude where I was living at the time (Bloomsburg, PA). I didn't have the internet yet so message boards were still an undiscovered luxury. But among the Eagles fans I lived and worked with, I was damn near the only one who didn't want Ricky.
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:25:43 PM
It's the same way you call all Skins fans delusional, does'nt feel good does it. This reminds me of preschool
Are you comparing 15 people at the draft six or seven years ago to the hundreds of Skins fans I have met and been friends with and lived around and intereacted with on football message boards for the last 13 years?
You couldn't be. That wouldn't make any sense.
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 29, 2005, 10:28:05 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 10:26:05 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 29, 2005, 10:23:27 PM
Doubt it all you want. But I know I was one of the very few who didn't want Ricky Williams in the 99 draft. I hang on to that because it's one of the few things I've ever been right about. Except for the Skins sucking ballz. I'm right about that too.
No, because you're also wrong about being one of the "very few", Sarge. Get your pens out of T-hawk's mom for a second, and listen to yourself.
One last word of advice before I hit the sack: Don't drink and post.
I saw "very few" because of the general fan attitude where I was living at the time (Bloomsburg, PA). I didn't have the internet yet so message boards were still an undiscovered luxury. But among the Eagles fans I lived and worked with, I was damn near the only one who didn't want Ricky.
I think 610 wip radio station brought up a clan of people to the draft. They could'nt have been more wrong
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:29:33 PM
I think 610 wip radio station brought up a clan of people to the draft. They could'nt have been more wrong
Yes, it was WIP that showed up with their band of nincumpoops.
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:25:43 PM
It's the same way you call all Skins fans delusional, does'nt feel good does it. This reminds me of preschool
Your responses are at the very least non sequiturs, archer.
In fact, this entire exercise is pointless just like the taterskins' last 10 seasons have been.
If you're not willing to admit that your team is a joke, there's really no reason for us to respond to you any further.
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 29, 2005, 10:30:37 PM
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:29:33 PM
I think 610 wip radio station brought up a clan of people to the draft. They could'nt have been more wrong
Yes, it was WIP that showed up with their band of nincumpoops.
McNabb, to this day, won't call into the station
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on August 29, 2005, 10:31:25 PM
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:25:43 PM
It's the same way you call all Skins fans delusional, does'nt feel good does it. This reminds me of preschool
Your responses are at the very least non sequiturs, archer.
In fact, this entire exercise is pointless just like the taterskins' last 10 seasons have been.
If you're not willing to admit that your team is a joke, there's really no reason for us to respond to you any further.
My team is a joke, and won't beat the Eagles up physically, and on the scoreboard, during that Sunday night game in DC.
P.S.....my fingers are crossed
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on August 29, 2005, 10:31:25 PM
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:25:43 PM
It's the same way you call all Skins fans delusional, does'nt feel good does it. This reminds me of preschool
Your responses are at the very least non sequiturs, archer.
In fact, this entire exercise is pointless just like the taterskins' last 10 seasons have been.
If you're not willing to admit that your team is a joke, there's really no reason for us to respond to you any further.
Seriously though, I believe we'll be in contention for a wild card, I think we will win that Sunday night game, the other game will be close but you'll win.
Also, T.O. will boil over again when he finds out Westbrook got a 9 mil signing bonus and 4 mil a year
Quote from: rjs246 on August 29, 2005, 10:13:58 PM
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:03:45 PM
You don't agree Taylor Is one of the top safeties in the league? Man, you're just hatin now
After one season you're trying to say that Taylor is one of the best in the league?
Jesus, I'm not getting involved in this anymore. I clearly overestimated your ability to reason and make logical points.
Your honor, the defense would like to present as evidence exhibit "a":
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/ST-BadToTheBone.mpg
Wow. Good point. Taylor sure is good at hitting receivers out of bounds. Pro-Bowl here he comes!
Seriously, is that just a clip of his most obvious penalties?
Quote from: rjs246 on August 29, 2005, 11:08:09 PM
Wow. Good point. Taylor sure is good at hitting receivers out of bounds. Pro-Bowl here he comes!
It seems him and T.O. don't like each other, they always seem to trash talk each other. This year T.O. can trash talk to him about going to jail, and he can trash talk to T.O. for making "poor mans" wages.
Got to admit, it would be great to have them miked for the game.
Quote from: rjs246 on August 29, 2005, 11:08:09 PM
Wow. Good point. Taylor sure is good at hitting receivers out of bounds. Pro-Bowl here he comes!
Seriously, is that just a clip of his most obvious penalties?
LOL
I have nothing to contribute.
Quote from: MDS on August 29, 2005, 07:05:32 PM
Art is now writing articles for taterskins.com giving the "fans" take on the Skins. :-D
Here's his first crock of shtein kissing the ground that Gibbs, Cerato and Snyder walk on: Heereee (http://www.taterskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=9630)
QuoteIf the taterskins actually decide to string a few wins together here early in the season, we're done talking about having the best offensive line since the Hogs. When winning starts, we're starting the chatter about having the best offensive line EVER.
Ahahhahaha!
QuoteTo paraphrase the wise, taunting-Uncle-Art, words once spoken by the 4-year-old daughter of family friends, "We rule. Pittsburgh drools."
Haha. Maybe Big Ben should be replaced by Mark Brunell, eh?
Behold meltdown at ExtremeSteelers or wherever those misguided fans chat. Terrible towels for terrible tears there I bet. The Steelers motto: 15-1 and UNDONE.
I am now dumber for having read that. God bless my soul.
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:31:36 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 29, 2005, 10:30:37 PM
Quote from: archer on August 29, 2005, 10:29:33 PM
I think 610 wip radio station brought up a clan of people to the draft. They could'nt have been more wrong
Yes, it was WIP that showed up with their band of nincumpoops.
McNabb, to this day, won't call into the station
Good for him. I also won't call in. Won't even listen either, so that makes it much easier. I just know they're talkin' shtein about me right now, but it doesn't bother me one bit.
Quote from: FFatPatt on August 29, 2005, 10:00:47 PM
Our best cornerback didn't make the Pro Bowl, and he was the only one who didn't.
You can be damn sure he will this year.
This message has been brought to you by Team Brown...What can Brown do for you?
As Roderick Hood's official spokesperson I can confirm that he would be a starting cornerback in the NFL if he played for the Washington taterskins. Sorry, I am sure there are decent taterskins fan out there, but EVERY year they come on here saying how this is going to be their year. Losing Antonio Pierce hurts, I think he's a hell of a player, I think the Giants will finish second in the NFC East.
Yeah i'm sure you knew who he was before the start of last season too, right?
Quote from: mooby on August 30, 2005, 01:54:18 PM
Yeah i'm sure you knew who he was before the start of last season too, right?
Who, Antonio Pierce? Why would we care who he was before last season?
henchmanuk said that losing Antonio Pierce hurts, he thought he was a hell of player, and the giants will finish 2nd in the NFC East. I asked him if he knew who A.P. was before the start of last season, because then, he was nothing but a backup outside linebacker who got pushed into the starting role in the middle because our starter there went down for the season. It's amazing how everyone thinks Pierce was so awesome, yet they don't even know his history. He was an undrafted free agent who spent some years with the Skins being a backup, he starts for one season, has a good season, and everyone assumes he's some hot shtein.
Quote from: mooby on August 30, 2005, 02:09:00 PM
henchmanuk said that losing Antonio Pierce hurts, he thought he was a hell of player, and the giants will finish 2nd in the NFC East. I asked him if he knew who A.P. was before the start of last season, because then, he was nothing but a backup outside linebacker who got pushed into the starting role in the middle because our starter there went down for the season. It's amazing how everyone thinks Pierce was so awesome, yet they don't even know his history. He was an undrafted free agent who spent some years with the Skins being a backup, he starts for one season, has a good season, and everyone assumes he's some hot shtein.
so your saying losing Pierce doesnt hurt just because of his backround? nonsense.
The Eagles find udrafted free agents who contribute all the time. Greg Lewis, Artis Hicks and Hank Fraley are all undrafted free agents who START for the Eagles this year. Sam Rayburn and Hollis Thomas were also undrafted free agents who contribute to the team.
Quote from: mooby on August 30, 2005, 02:09:00 PM
henchmanuk said that losing Antonio Pierce hurts, he thought he was a hell of player, and the giants will finish 2nd in the NFC East. I asked him if he knew who A.P. was before the start of last season, because then, he was nothing but a backup outside linebacker who got pushed into the starting role in the middle because our starter there went down for the season. It's amazing how everyone thinks Pierce was so awesome, yet they don't even know his history. He was an undrafted free agent who spent some years with the Skins being a backup, he starts for one season, has a good season, and everyone assumes he's some hot shtein.
It's backwards, nonsensical thinking like yours that has undone Dan Snyder & the taterskins' front office. Using your logic, your team should nab Tim Couch immediately, because he's a former FIRST OVERALL pick! It doesn't matter how much he sucks now, because at one time, he was thought to be a future star in the NFL!
Geez, are Skins fans still trying to prove a point?
Wait so everyone agrees the taterskins have a better D?
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 30, 2005, 03:40:08 PM
Wait so everyone agrees the taterskins have a better D?
A better D than what? The 49ers? Sure, I'll go along with that.
Even John Clayton Thinks The taterskins Are A Laughingstock! (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/preview05/columns/story?columnist=clayton_john&id=2146705)
:-D
so everyone agrees that the taterskins have a better D than the eagles?
Quote from: MURP on August 30, 2005, 02:20:07 PM
Quote from: mooby on August 30, 2005, 02:09:00 PM
henchmanuk said that losing Antonio Pierce hurts, he thought he was a hell of player, and the giants will finish 2nd in the NFC East. I asked him if he knew who A.P. was before the start of last season, because then, he was nothing but a backup outside linebacker who got pushed into the starting role in the middle because our starter there went down for the season. It's amazing how everyone thinks Pierce was so awesome, yet they don't even know his history. He was an undrafted free agent who spent some years with the Skins being a backup, he starts for one season, has a good season, and everyone assumes he's some hot shtein.
so your saying losing Pierce doesnt hurt just because of his backround? nonsense.
The Eagles find udrafted free agents who contribute all the time. Greg Lewis, Artis Hicks and Hank Fraley are all undrafted free agents who START for the Eagles this year. Sam Rayburn and Hollis Thomas were also undrafted free agents who contribute to the team.
Psst... Hollis is starting or rather he's currently listed as the starter on the team depth chart.
Carry on...
:cfhead
(http://www.yensid.org/art/bush_finger.jpg)
(http://www.unconfirmedsources.com/nucleus/media/5/converted-20041110-bush-finger.jpg)
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 30, 2005, 03:47:20 PM
so everyone agrees that the taterskins have a better D than the eagles?
No; however, I will concede the taterskins do have a very good defense.
Too bad it'll take a shutout for them every week in order to eek out some wins this year.
The Skins season is gonna look a lot like Barker. Ugly and Worthless.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v400/dmkdjb/Barkerbrokenface.jpg)
I need to see the Cheap and Available.
Quote from: Tomahawk on August 30, 2005, 06:02:59 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 30, 2005, 03:47:20 PM
so everyone agrees that the taterskins have a better D than the eagles?
No; however, I will concede the taterskins do have a very good defense.
How are they not better when they gave up less yards AND less points and were on the field much longer?
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v400/dmkdjb/SMathewscry.jpg)
Excellent. My night is complete.
(http://joephila.org/lewhit3.gif)
This was in another thread that I had started:
Quote from: Jerome99RIPI Googled the phrase "taterskins suck" and got 50,600 hits.
Some of them are hysterical.
I Googled "Eagles Suck" and I got 219,000 hits! :-D :-D
Quote from: hkHog on August 30, 2005, 08:14:07 PM
Quote from: Tomahawk on August 30, 2005, 06:02:59 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 30, 2005, 03:47:20 PM
so everyone agrees that the taterskins have a better D than the eagles?
No; however, I will concede the taterskins do have a very good defense.
How are they not better when they gave up less yards AND less points and were on the field much longer?
Moron:
The Eagles opponents had the ball for 31:34 in 2004 while the taterskins opponents had the ball for 28:41.
Try again with the limp-dick time of possession angle.
Quote from: hkHog on August 30, 2005, 08:22:28 PM
This was in another thread that I had started:
Quote from: Jerome99RIPI Googled the phrase "taterskins suck" and got 50,600 hits.
Some of them are hysterical.
I Googled "Eagles Suck" and I got 219,000 hits! :-D :-D
Started by 219,000 taterskins fans who're embittered to the point of suicide over the Eagles utter domination of their pitiful team for the entire decade of the 2000s.
(http://www.joephila.org/dawkplexa.gif)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v400/dmkdjb/horsetrailor.jpg)
:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on August 30, 2005, 08:24:38 PM
Quote from: hkHog on August 30, 2005, 08:14:07 PM
Quote from: Tomahawk on August 30, 2005, 06:02:59 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 30, 2005, 03:47:20 PM
so everyone agrees that the taterskins have a better D than the eagles?
No; however, I will concede the taterskins do have a very good defense.
How are they not better when they gave up less yards AND less points and were on the field much longer?
Moron:
The Eagles opponents had the ball for 31:34 in 2004 while the taterskins opponents had the ball for 28:41.
Try again with the limp-meatcicle time of possession angle.
Alright, well we still gave up less yds/pass and yds/rush.
(http://img69.exs.cx/img69/5177/parryhit45hp.gif)
MURP really lays to wood to Springs here
Quote from: hkHog on August 30, 2005, 08:14:07 PM
Quote from: Tomahawk on August 30, 2005, 06:02:59 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 30, 2005, 03:47:20 PM
so everyone agrees that the taterskins have a better D than the eagles?
No; however, I will concede the taterskins do have a very good defense.
How are they not better when they gave up less yards AND less points and were on the field much longer?
Dude, I guess you forgot that most of starters didn't play in the final two games.
Quote from: Drunkmasterflex on August 30, 2005, 08:36:10 PM
Quote from: hkHog on August 30, 2005, 08:14:07 PM
Quote from: Tomahawk on August 30, 2005, 06:02:59 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 30, 2005, 03:47:20 PM
so everyone agrees that the taterskins have a better D than the eagles?
No; however, I will concede the taterskins do have a very good defense.
How are they not better when they gave up less yards AND less points and were on the field much longer?
Dude, I guess you forgot that most of starters didn't play in the final two games.
Our second and third stringers gave up a total of 58 points in the last two games of the season. Skins fans constantly overlook that because it doesn't support their cause.
Just about to chime in on that one, Drunk...
The Eagles averaged 5.84 yards per attempt against the pass and 4.31 ypa against the run.
The Skins averaged 5.78 ypa against the pass and 3.11 ypa against the run.
Take out the two blowouts when our defensive team didn't play much, if at all, and those figures drop dramatically.
Also, considering the Eagles usually were blowing teams out by halftime in most games, the statistics that the Hoglicker is clinging desperately to are specious at best.
The bottom line is, the Eagles were 13-3 and the taterskins were 6-10. By any statistical measure I've ever heard of, they got their asses owned in that department by the Birds.
Not entirely true SD the starting defense did give up 1 td on the first drive to the Rams. ;) doesn't matter though 51 still can be credited to the 2nd and 3rd teamers.
The Eagles rush defense--and, defense overall--stiffened considerably after Trotter moved into the starting MLB position at mid-season. He'll be there out of the gate this year, folks.
Quote from: SD_Eagle on August 30, 2005, 08:27:05 PM
(http://www.joephila.org/dawkplexa.gif)
Post the one when Pinkston "lost the ball in the lights" :-D. Come on, you know the one :-D. That play empitomizes your team full of yellow bellied sap suckers
ahem...
NFC East
Philadelphia Eagles 13 3
Washington taterskins 6 10
Dallas Cowboys 6 10
New York Giants 6 10
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 30, 2005, 03:47:20 PM
so everyone agrees that the taterskins have a better D than the eagles?
I second that motion :o
Quote from: jeffreyjpa on August 30, 2005, 08:55:27 PM
The Eagles rush defense--and, defense overall--stiffened considerably after Trotter moved into the starting MLB position at mid-season. He'll be there out of the gate this year, folks.
That is great news, can't wait to get him in pass coverage covering Portis. :-D I'm like a kid waiting for Christmas ;D
Quote from: archer on August 30, 2005, 10:39:23 PM
Quote from: jeffreyjpa on August 30, 2005, 08:55:27 PM
The Eagles rush defense--and, defense overall--stiffened considerably after Trotter moved into the starting MLB position at mid-season. He'll be there out of the gate this year, folks.
That is great news, can't wait to get him in pass coverage covering Portis. :-D I'm like a kid waiting for Christmas ;D
And so will Michael Lewis. :evil :evil :evil >:D >:D >:D
Quote from: archer on August 30, 2005, 10:39:23 PM
Quote from: jeffreyjpa on August 30, 2005, 08:55:27 PM
The Eagles rush defense--and, defense overall--stiffened considerably after Trotter moved into the starting MLB position at mid-season. He'll be there out of the gate this year, folks.
That is great news, can't wait to get him in pass coverage covering Portis. :-D I'm like a kid waiting for Christmas ;D
Yeah, Portis tore up the Eagles D (especially as a receiver) last year:
Nov 17: 1 Reception, - 4 Yds (17 carries, 37 yards, 2.2 YPC)
Dec 12: 4 Receptions, 22 yds (23 carries, 80 yards, 3.5 YPC)
Quote from: Catapult on August 30, 2005, 10:45:40 PM
Quote from: archer on August 30, 2005, 10:39:23 PM
Quote from: jeffreyjpa on August 30, 2005, 08:55:27 PM
The Eagles rush defense--and, defense overall--stiffened considerably after Trotter moved into the starting MLB position at mid-season. He'll be there out of the gate this year, folks.
That is great news, can't wait to get him in pass coverage covering Portis. :-D I'm like a kid waiting for Christmas ;D
And so will Michael Lewis. :evil :evil :evil >:D >:D >:D
Who? you are kidding, right?
Quote from: jeffreyjpa on August 30, 2005, 10:51:16 PM
Quote from: archer on August 30, 2005, 10:39:23 PM
Quote from: jeffreyjpa on August 30, 2005, 08:55:27 PM
The Eagles rush defense--and, defense overall--stiffened considerably after Trotter moved into the starting MLB position at mid-season. He'll be there out of the gate this year, folks.
That is great news, can't wait to get him in pass coverage covering Portis. :-D I'm like a kid waiting for Christmas ;D
Yeah, Portis tore up the Eagles D (especially as a receiver) last year:
Nov 17: 1 Reception, - 4 Yds (17 carries, 37 yards, 2.2 YPC)
Dec 12: 4 Receptions, 22 yds (23 carries, 80 yards, 3.5 YPC)
Always talking about the past, different offense this year will mean different result, watch,
Quote from: archer on August 30, 2005, 10:30:56 PM
Post the one when Pinkston "lost the ball in the lights" :-D. Come on, you know the one :-D. That play empitomizes your team full of yellow bellied sap suckers
Or the pic from the first game, when Pinkston caught about a 40-yard pass, took a shot from Taylor and got up & mocked him. :-D :-D
(http://home.comcast.net/~beermonkey/pink2.jpg)
Quote from: Beermonkey on August 30, 2005, 11:13:27 PM
Quote from: archer on August 30, 2005, 10:30:56 PM
Post the one when Pinkston "lost the ball in the lights" :-D. Come on, you know the one :-D. That play empitomizes your team full of yellow bellied sap suckers
Or the pic from the first game, when Pinkston caught about a 40-yard pass, took a shot from Taylor and got up & mocked him. :-D :-D
(http://home.comcast.net/~beermonkey/pink2.jpg)
Ah, chief, looks like a deer-in-the-headlights look to me. He's probably trying to get the license number off the truck that just hit him. ;D
Quote from: archer on August 30, 2005, 11:21:01 PM
Quote from: Beermonkey on August 30, 2005, 11:13:27 PM
Quote from: archer on August 30, 2005, 10:30:56 PM
Post the one when Pinkston "lost the ball in the lights" :-D. Come on, you know the one :-D. That play empitomizes your team full of yellow bellied sap suckers
Or the pic from the first game, when Pinkston caught about a 40-yard pass, took a shot from Taylor and got up & mocked him. :-D :-D
Ah, chief, looks like a deer-in-the-headlights look to me. He's probably trying to get the license number off the truck that just hit him. ;D
More like a crazed crackhead who just beat down a drug dealer, saying "Is that all you got bitch!".
seriously though, don't you wish the players would get into these games as much as the fans do? They could could'nt care less if they win or lose, they are all, let me repeat that, all in it for the money, and they view us as the gas that keeps their great engine running.
Quote from: Beermonkey on August 30, 2005, 11:23:23 PM
Quote from: archer on August 30, 2005, 11:21:01 PM
Quote from: Beermonkey on August 30, 2005, 11:13:27 PM
Quote from: archer on August 30, 2005, 10:30:56 PM
Post the one when Pinkston "lost the ball in the lights" :-D. Come on, you know the one :-D. That play empitomizes your team full of yellow bellied sap suckers
Or the pic from the first game, when Pinkston caught about a 40-yard pass, took a shot from Taylor and got up & mocked him. :-D :-D
Ah, chief, looks like a deer-in-the-headlights look to me. He's probably trying to get the license number off the truck that just hit him. ;D
More like a crazed crackhead who just beat down a drug dealer, saying "Is that all you got bitch!".
Yeah, that to
Quote from: hkHog on August 30, 2005, 08:14:07 PM
Quote from: Tomahawk on August 30, 2005, 06:02:59 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 30, 2005, 03:47:20 PM
so everyone agrees that the taterskins have a better D than the eagles?
No; however, I will concede the taterskins do have a very good defense.
How are they not better when they gave up less yards AND less points and were on the field much longer?
The Eagles were tied for second with the Patriots in Points Allowed Per Game at 16.2.
Once again, it's the same old garbage every year. One skins fan on here is even PROUD of being the NFL's offseason champs every year! :-D The difference between Skins and Eagles fans is that when we suck we KNOW we suck, the deluded Skins fan thinks his/her team is great even when they DO suck. This is why it is FUN to "point and laugh at the taterskins" every year!
Quote from: Tomahawk on August 31, 2005, 12:40:29 AM
Quote from: hkHog on August 30, 2005, 08:14:07 PM
Quote from: Tomahawk on August 30, 2005, 06:02:59 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 30, 2005, 03:47:20 PM
so everyone agrees that the taterskins have a better D than the eagles?
No; however, I will concede the taterskins do have a very good defense.
How are they not better when they gave up less yards AND less points and were on the field much longer?
The Eagles were tied for second with the Patriots in Points Allowed Per Game at 16.2.
obviously you didn't read before our defense gave up less points, our offense and special teams gave up more points, if you take away offensive and special team points given up, like kick returns, punt returns, INTs for TDs, or fumbles for TDs , from both teams the taterskins would have given up less points, and to the admission of most everyone in here, the defense that gives up the least points is the best. So i guess we settle that debate.
(http://gallery.phillyburbs.com/photos/63/7.aspx)
(http://gallery.phillyburbs.com/photos/55/7.aspx)
(http://www.philly.com/images/realcities/realcities/10241/104882811342.jpg)
Quote from: archer on August 30, 2005, 11:07:19 PM
Quote from: jeffreyjpa on August 30, 2005, 10:51:16 PM
Quote from: archer on August 30, 2005, 10:39:23 PM
Quote from: jeffreyjpa on August 30, 2005, 08:55:27 PM
The Eagles rush defense--and, defense overall--stiffened considerably after Trotter moved into the starting MLB position at mid-season. He'll be there out of the gate this year, folks.
That is great news, can't wait to get him in pass coverage covering Portis. :-D I'm like a kid waiting for Christmas ;D
Yeah, Portis tore up the Eagles D (especially as a receiver) last year:
Nov 17: 1 Reception, - 4 Yds (17 carries, 37 yards, 2.2 YPC)
Dec 12: 4 Receptions, 22 yds (23 carries, 80 yards, 3.5 YPC)
Always talking about the past, different offense this year will mean different result, watch,
Oh, yeah, that's right...you guys have already pointed out how much the taterskins' Yards-Per-Catch is up in the PRESEASON. That always directly translates into regular season success. It's like a whole different taterskins offense than last year, they just have all the same players, except they traded an oft-injured WR for an underachieving one.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 31, 2005, 06:18:56 AM
Quote from: Tomahawk on August 31, 2005, 12:40:29 AM
Quote from: hkHog on August 30, 2005, 08:14:07 PM
Quote from: Tomahawk on August 30, 2005, 06:02:59 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 30, 2005, 03:47:20 PM
so everyone agrees that the taterskins have a better D than the eagles?
No; however, I will concede the taterskins do have a very good defense.
How are they not better when they gave up less yards AND less points and were on the field much longer?
The Eagles were tied for second with the Patriots in Points Allowed Per Game at 16.2.
obviously you didn't read before our defense gave up less points, our offense and special teams gave up more points, if you take away offensive and special team points given up, like kick returns, punt returns, INTs for TDs, or fumbles for TDs , from both teams the taterskins would have given up less points, and to the admission of most everyone in here, the defense that gives up the least points is the best. So i guess we settle that debate.
I would type touche; however, I have been smoking the same crack as the taterskins fans who believe their team has a chance of even being halfway decent so instead I'll type that the taterskins backup defense (Ramsey et al) should learn to tackle better so they're not scored on as much.
Quote from: jeffreyjpa on August 31, 2005, 07:42:28 AM
except they traded an oft-injured WR for an underachieving one.
What do you call Santana Moss? :-D
15 pages? That's too much time spent talking about a worthless team.
Quote from: QB Eagles on August 31, 2005, 08:21:28 AM
15 pages? That's too much time spent talking about a worthless team.
agreed
Not while we are pointing and laughing at them.
Its so much fun. And ignorant Skins fans trying to make completely baseless points are even funnier. :yay
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 31, 2005, 08:43:39 AM
Its so much fun. And ignorant Skins fans trying to make completely baseless points are even funnier. :yay
You mean like TO being gay? I wasn't on the board at all last night. Glad to see I picked the right night to take some time off.
Skins fans are teh ghey!
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 31, 2005, 07:31:45 AM
(http://gallery.phillyburbs.com/photos/63/7.aspx)
(http://gallery.phillyburbs.com/photos/55/7.aspx)
(http://www.philly.com/images/realcities/realcities/10241/104882811342.jpg)
We all know he's a Hoyda
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI03_PinkstonHearsFootsteps.mpg
And T.O. being gay is hardly a baseless point, go ahead and look at my post. The FACTUAL EVIDENCE is overwhelming!
You're still here?
I, for one, think TO is gay.
I think that the Skins defense, while very different in talent-level and purpose from our own, is exceptional.
I also believe that the Skins won't win more than 7 games this year. In fact I'll be surprised if they win more than 5. 0-4 versus the AFC West (I don't see a single team that the Skins can beat there). 2-4 versus the NFC East (swept by the cowboys and eagles). 2-2 versus NFC West.
Your other 3 games I do not know, so I'll give you a win or two there.
I'm not getting into that because the thread was locked as it should have been. I probably shouldn't have even mentioned it in this one because this thread is funny and I don't want to see it get shut down. Either way, we're going to laugh at the Skins regardless of what you say or do.
Yes, I'm sorry to have lowered the tone in what has otherwise been a very classy thread. :-[
It stopped being a "classy" thread when people of your ilk starting tainting it.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 31, 2005, 08:20:02 AM
Quote from: jeffreyjpa on August 31, 2005, 07:42:28 AM
except they traded an oft-injured WR for an underachieving one.
What do you call Santana Moss? :-D
A sitting duck for the Eagles Secondary.
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 31, 2005, 09:10:51 AM
It stopped being a "classy" thread when people of your ilk starting tainting it.
Au contrair, didn't your mother ever tell you that pointing was rude?
Quote from: hkHog on August 31, 2005, 09:15:46 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 31, 2005, 09:10:51 AM
It stopped being a "classy" thread when people of your ilk starting tainting it.
Au contrair, didn't your mother ever tell you that pointing was rude?
Sean Taylor thought so when Pinky pointed to the scoreboard.
Quote from: henchmanUK on August 31, 2005, 09:18:39 AM
Quote from: hkHog on August 31, 2005, 09:15:46 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 31, 2005, 09:10:51 AM
It stopped being a "classy" thread when people of your ilk starting tainting it.
Au contrair, didn't your mother ever tell you that pointing was rude?
Sean Taylor thought so when Pinky pointed to the scoreboard.
(http://gallery.phillyburbs.com/photos/55/7.aspx)
(I just can't laugh enough at this)
Quote from: henchmanUK on August 31, 2005, 09:18:39 AM
Quote from: hkHog on August 31, 2005, 09:15:46 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 31, 2005, 09:10:51 AM
It stopped being a "classy" thread when people of your ilk starting tainting it.
Au contrair, didn't your mother ever tell you that pointing was rude?
Sean Taylor thought so when Pinky pointed to the scoreboard.
I have to give you credit, that is pretty funny.
He's lucky Sean didn't have his glock on him though.
Quote from: hkHog on August 31, 2005, 09:08:54 AM
Yes, I'm sorry to have lowered the tone in what has otherwise been a very classy thread. :-[
Quote from: hkHog on August 31, 2005, 09:21:38 AM
He's lucky Sean didn't have his glock on him though.
::)
Quote from: hkHog on August 31, 2005, 09:21:38 AM
Quote from: henchmanUK on August 31, 2005, 09:18:39 AM
Quote from: hkHog on August 31, 2005, 09:15:46 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 31, 2005, 09:10:51 AM
It stopped being a "classy" thread when people of your ilk starting tainting it.
Au contrair, didn't your mother ever tell you that pointing was rude?
Sean Taylor thought so when Pinky pointed to the scoreboard.
I have to give you credit, that is pretty funny.
He's lucky Sean didn't have his glock on him though.
Ah ha ha. :-D ;)
That is a great shot, I forgot about that moment from last season.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 31, 2005, 08:20:02 AM
Quote from: jeffreyjpa on August 31, 2005, 07:42:28 AM
except they traded an oft-injured WR for an underachieving one.
What do you call Santana Moss? :-D
From watching them both play the last two seasons, I call him a step down from Laverneus Coles. ;)
QuoteThat is a great shot, I forgot about that moment from last season.
Sean hasn't, I think that may be why Stinkston decided to lay low this year.
Quote from: jeffreyjpa on August 31, 2005, 09:25:10 AM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 31, 2005, 08:20:02 AM
Quote from: jeffreyjpa on August 31, 2005, 07:42:28 AM
except they traded an oft-injured WR for an underachieving one.
What do you call Santana Moss? :-D
From watching them both play the last two seasons, I call him a step down from Laverneus Coles. ;)
oft-injured is Moss' middle name. ;)
After the season is over, and this thread is over 1000 pages long, Im printing it out and sending it to the Hall of Fame.
word life. Holla.
Quote from: hkHog on August 31, 2005, 09:25:27 AM
QuoteThat is a great shot, I forgot about that moment from last season.
Sean hasn't, I think that may be why Stinkston decided to lay low this year.
I think Sean should have been the one to "lay low" this year.
(http://home.comcast.net/~beermonkey/drunktank_seantaylor.jpg)
I once spent the night in the Fairfax County holding facility attached to the Courthouse. Sean Taylor wasn't there that night. Ah memories.
How ANYONE can sit here and talk about Sean Taylor and pimp him after this offseason is beyond me.
Worry more about whether your stud player is going to be in court on Sept 12 and jail after that. And don't say its impossible.
Ask Ravens fans about it being impossible for a player to go to jail.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 31, 2005, 09:34:09 AM
How ANYONE can sit here and talk about Sean Taylor and pimp him after this offseason is beyond me.
Worry more about whether your stud player is going to be in court on Sept 12 and jail after that. And don't say its impossible.
Ask Ravens fans about it being impossible for a player to go to jail.
I'm not worrying about Sept 12:
QuoteSean Taylor, the quixotic and supremely talented free safety from the University of Miami, won't have to face a Miami-Dade County jury on his felony assault charge until at least February, but he's still on trial with his coaches and fans at the Washington taterskins.
A spokesman for the state attorney's office said Tuesday prosecutors will not oppose a continuation of Taylor's Sept. 12 court date until after the season, which means coach Joe Gibbs can expect a full season from his gifted second-year player.
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/sfl-bricker29aug29,0,7890826.column?coll=sfla-sports-headlines
So, like your neighbors the Ravens, you'll have a felon playing for you. Congratulations.
Now THAT'S a guy you can root for. ::)
And you have the balls to rip on TO for his off-field big mouth and stupid antics?
I'll take TO's nonsense over worrying about my players going to jail anyday.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 31, 2005, 09:47:21 AM
So, like your neighbors the Ravens, you'll have a felon playing for you. Congratulations.
Now THAT'S a guy you can root for. ::)
And you have the balls to rip on TO for his off-field big mouth and stupid antics?
I'll take TO's nonsense over worrying about my players going to jail anyday.
Hey, I never ripped on T.O. for anything other than him ripping on other people.
Methinks you should worry about your own teams' blatant issues instead of worrying about TO's big mouth.
Right, you guys should worry about that.
Quote from: hkHog on August 31, 2005, 09:57:46 AM
Right, you guys should worry about that.
Worry about TO? Wow, I had never thought of that. To my knowledge not a single Eagles fan ever worries about anything. We just assume that everything is OK all the time and blindly believe that our team will dominate. We certainly wouldn't ever take the time to worry about TO.
Idiot.
Quote from: rjs246 on August 31, 2005, 10:01:11 AM
Quote from: hkHog on August 31, 2005, 09:57:46 AM
Right, you guys should worry about that.
Worry about TO? Wow, I had never thought of that. To my knowledge not a single Eagles fan ever worries about anything. We just assume that everything is OK all the time and blindly believe that our team will dominate. We certainly wouldn't ever take the time to worry about TO.
Idiot.
Thank you, rjs, for, once again, pointing out the difference between taterskin and Eagle fans.
:-D @ taterskins
It's been over 2 hours since anyone here pointed or laughed at the taterskins. Don't let it happen again.
:-D
came in just under the wire for you sarge
Yeah, I noticed you fargers were testing my patience. :-D :paranoid
Where'd the McCants thread go? I was hitting the post button and then it disappeared.
Quote from: phattymatty on August 31, 2005, 02:26:25 PM
Where'd the McCants thread go? I was hitting the post button and then it disappeared.
It got merged into the thread over in the Eagles section I think.
It's really great having to wait a half hour for a thread to load because you guys want to post a bajillion pictures and ten farging movies. Thanks iceholes.
Quote from: General_Failure on August 31, 2005, 02:34:34 PM
It's really great having to wait a half hour for a thread to load because you guys want to post a bajillion pictures and ten farging movies. Thanks iceholes.
Get a high-speed interweb connection, dork.
Quote from: rjs246 on August 31, 2005, 02:35:37 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on August 31, 2005, 02:34:34 PM
It's really great having to wait a half hour for a thread to load because you guys want to post a bajillion pictures and ten farging movies. Thanks iceholes.
Get a high-speed interweb connection, dork.
:-D :-D :-D
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y133/Bobberton/ThreadShi.jpg)
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 31, 2005, 02:36:01 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on August 31, 2005, 02:35:37 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on August 31, 2005, 02:34:34 PM
It's really great having to wait a half hour for a thread to load because you guys want to post a bajillion pictures and ten farging movies. Thanks iceholes.
Get a high-speed interweb connection, dork.
:-D :-D :-D
How's Comcast working out for you, by the way?
Quote from: rjs246 on August 31, 2005, 02:35:37 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on August 31, 2005, 02:34:34 PM
It's really great having to wait a half hour for a thread to load because you guys want to post a bajillion pictures and ten farging movies. Thanks iceholes.
Get a high-speed interweb connection, dork.
:-D :-D :-D
Better yet. Let's just start posting lots of pictures in each thread and drive him nuts.
Quote from: General_Failure on August 31, 2005, 02:55:02 PM
How's Comcast working out for you, by the way?
Just fine. Never had a problem with with those blood suckers, sucker.
I was asking the midget, drunk.
Drunk midgets are teh kewl.
(http://www.eonline.com/Features/Live/Powers/Premiere/Gallery/Images/g.minime.jpg)
Did someone say booze?
Anyone notice the new user? Skin-r-back? They're coming over in droves.
Idiocy loves company.
They miss me over there.
Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC on August 31, 2005, 03:02:53 PM
Anyone notice the new user? Skin-r-back? They're coming over in droves.
They all share the same brain. They're like the Borg only not as threatening or funny.
Quote from: General_Failure on August 31, 2005, 03:03:47 PM
They miss me over there.
If we give them over to you, do you think they will stop coming?
We may never know.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 31, 2005, 09:47:21 AM
So, like your neighbors the Ravens, you'll have a felon playing for you. Congratulations.
Now THAT'S a guy you can root for. ::)
And you have the balls to rip on TO for his off-field big mouth and stupid antics?
I'll take TO's nonsense over worrying about my players going to jail anyday.
innocent until proven guilty. I , for one, believe his attorney when he says " Sean is actually the victim here, you'll see in court" ::) ::) :paranoid :paranoid
Quote from: archer on September 02, 2005, 09:37:43 PM
I , for one, believe his attorney when he says " Sean is actually the victim here, you'll see in court" ::) ::) :paranoid :paranoid
Yeah, 'cuz attorneys never lie. ;)
I'll believe that when me shtein turns purple and smells like rainbow sherbert.
Quote from: Sgt PSN on September 02, 2005, 09:39:28 PM
Quote from: archer on September 02, 2005, 09:37:43 PM
I , for one, believe his attorney when he says " Sean is actually the victim here, you'll see in court" ::) ::) :paranoid :paranoid
Yeah, 'cuz attorneys never lie. ;)
I'll believe that when me shtein turns purple and smells like rainbow sherbert.
I agree, I believe he's heading for a boat load of trouble
They've cut both of the linebackers they drafted. McCune (seriously big dude) and Newberry. They can afford it, after all they had what, seven picks in the whole draft? :-D
***Edited for drunkeness.
I love it when you guys post drunktalk. Number one wost manneans!
From the KFFL Hotwire....
Quotetaterskins | Gibbs Concerned with Lack of Discipline
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 08:04:06 -0700
Jason La Canfora, of the Washington Post, reports Washington taterskins head coach Joe Gibbs is concerned with his team's lack of discipline shown throughout the preseason. "It's a real concern," Gibbs said of the penalties. "It's a problem. We've got to get it corrected because you won't win games up here turning the ball over and I'd still say those are two areas where we have not showed the kind of improvement I'd like -- turning the ball over and penalties. So it's something for a real focus from now until game time." The taterskins had the worst turnover differential in the NFC during the exhibition season.
>:D
Quotetaterskins | Gibbs Concerned with Lack of Discipline
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 08:04:06 -0700
Jason La Canfora, of the Washington Post, reports Washington taterskins head coach Joe Gibbs is concerned with his team's lack of discipline shown throughout the preseason. "It's a real concern," Gibbs said of the penalties. "It's a problem. We've got to get it corrected because you won't win games up here turning the ball over and I'd still say those are two areas where we have not showed the kind of improvement I'd like -- turning the ball over and penalties. So it's something for a real focus from now until game time." The taterskins had the worst turnover differential in the NFC during the exhibition season.
Ahh, another NFL season. :-D
They also cut Garnell Wilds.
He was the guy the Skins fans were fellating because he "shut down Randy Moss". And he was the next stud CB to come to Washington. :-D
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 31, 2005, 06:18:56 AM
...if you take away offensive and special team points given up, like kick returns, punt returns, INTs for TDs, or fumbles for TDs , from both teams the taterskins would have given up less points...
Well, as long as we are manipulating the stats so they look better, How did the Eagles defense do in Games that mattered?
Regular season, excluding the last two games where the Eagles rested starters: 14.4 ppg
Postseason: 16 ppg. How did the 'Skins do in the postseason? Oh yeah, that's right...
C
Arguing statistics with fans whose team went 15-4 when your team went 6-10 is really sad.
It's also a sign of mild retardation which is certainly understandable considering their male fans routinely wear dresses and pig snouts to games.
:-D :-D :-D
Great Gibbs quote: (http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/sports/football/nfl/12573720.htm)
Quote"When I first told Pat about going back into coaching, she said, 'You're going to ruin your good name.' I told her after the season, 'We're halfway there,' " Gibbs said with a laugh. "They're backing up the pickup truck trying to get that Hall of Fame bust out of there. They'll melt that baby down when it's all said and done."
Quote from: Cerevant on September 06, 2005, 04:30:48 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 31, 2005, 06:18:56 AM
...if you take away offensive and special team points given up, like kick returns, punt returns, INTs for TDs, or fumbles for TDs , from both teams the taterskins would have given up less points...
Well, as long as we are manipulating the stats so they look better, How did the Eagles defense do in Games that mattered?
Regular season, excluding the last two games where the Eagles rested starters: 14.4 ppg
Postseason: 16 ppg. How did the 'Skins do in the postseason? Oh yeah, that's right...
C
manipulating stats? the taterskins defense gave up less points than your defense plain and simple. An offense turnover for a touchdown has nothing to how good a defense is. I agree that the taterskins are a worse team and I have said before that the taterskins had the worst offense last year of any team and that the defense carried whatever was there. The defense was better in every catagory and most of you were so proud of your points per game that you now know the taterskins are better in.
as for the penalties the taterskins had much less offensive penalties than the eagles and defensivly we ranked number one in penalties. http://www.nfl.com/stats/teamsort/NFL/DEF-TOTAL/2005/pre?sort_col_1=4&_1:col_1=13
It is funny you all just yell out things before you actually look up into what you are saying. You all were so very proud of you defensive points per game but the taterskins were better and according to many of you POINTS PER GAME IS ALL THAT MATTERS, I don't fully agree with that because a bad offense can really hurt a defense, Also you started to talk about penalties before you even knew that the taterskins did better in the preseason. I don't really care much for the preseason but i know one of you will say preseason doesn't matter, i agree it doesn't matter just remember i didn't bring it up because you all seem to forget i am just commenting on something someone else commented on. The taterskins looked bad on STs when it came to penalties but offensively they are top 10 and on defense they are number 1 this preseason, both better than the eagles.
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on September 06, 2005, 04:37:02 PM
Arguing statistics with fans whose team went 15-4 when your team went 6-10 is really sad.
the reverse i feel is even more sad ;)
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 06, 2005, 05:15:37 PM
It is funny you all just yell out things before you actually look up into what you are saying. You all were so very proud of you defensive points per game but the taterskins were better and according to many of you POINTS PER GAME IS ALL THAT MATTERS, I don't fully agree with that because a bad offense can really hurt a defense, Also you started to talk about penalties before you even knew that the taterskins did better in the preseason. I don't really care much for the preseason but i know one of you will say preseason doesn't matter, i agree it doesn't matter just remember i didn't bring it up because you all seem to forget i am just commenting on something someone else commented on. The taterskins looked bad on STs when it came to penalties but offensively they are top 10 and on defense they are number 1 this preseason, both better than the eagles.
No one here gives a rats ass about the preseason. You just wasted your (and all of our) time.
Go ahead and come back during week 12 or so if you like, and you can start pointing out stats which would make it seem preposterous that the Eagles are 10-1 and the taterskins are 3-7. That should be fun.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 06, 2005, 05:15:37 PM
manipulating stats? bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah
Yes. You were manilupating stats. So he manipulated ours. Our first team defense played 14 games last year. In those 14 games they gave up 14.4 points per game. Which was significantly better than your first team defense did. It isn't rocket science, but then again as a Skins fan, perhaps simple math qualifies as rocket science.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 06, 2005, 05:19:34 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 06, 2005, 05:15:37 PM
It is funny you all just yell out things before you actually look up into what you are saying. You all were so very proud of you defensive points per game but the taterskins were better and according to many of you POINTS PER GAME IS ALL THAT MATTERS, I don't fully agree with that because a bad offense can really hurt a defense, Also you started to talk about penalties before you even knew that the taterskins did better in the preseason. I don't really care much for the preseason but i know one of you will say preseason doesn't matter, i agree it doesn't matter just remember i didn't bring it up because you all seem to forget i am just commenting on something someone else commented on. The taterskins looked bad on STs when it came to penalties but offensively they are top 10 and on defense they are number 1 this preseason, both better than the eagles.
No one here gives a rats ass about the preseason. You just wasted your (and all of our) time.
wow i knew someone would say something about me talking about the preseason, again i was just talking about it because someone else had.
Joe Gibbs was a decent coach who benefitted greatly from an owner with deep pockets in a league with unbounded team salary. In the salary cap era, he's just a has-been race car owner trying for another shot at football glory.
Quote from: rjs246 on September 06, 2005, 05:21:52 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 06, 2005, 05:15:37 PM
manipulating stats? bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah
Yes. You were manilupating stats. So he manipulated ours. Our first team defense played 14 games last year. In those 14 games they gave up 14.4 points per game. Which was significantly better than your first team defense did. It isn't rocket science, but then again as a Skins fan, perhaps simple math qualifies as rocket science.
FROM HK HOG
FACTS:
1. The taterskins defense gave up less points than the Philly D did last year. Overall the taterskins AS A TEAM gave up 265 points last year while the Eagles gave up 260. However, Philly had one TD scored against it because of an int. Six TDs were scored against the 'Skins while the defense was not on the field (one PR, one KR, one int, and three fumbles). So, therefore, the Eagles D surrendered 253 pts or 15.8 pts/game, and the 'Skins D only gave up 223 pts (tied with the Steelers for least in the league)
or 13.9 pts/game. Therefore, statistically the taterskins defense was better than the Philly D in EVERY statistical category.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 06, 2005, 05:34:34 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on September 06, 2005, 05:21:52 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 06, 2005, 05:15:37 PM
manipulating stats? bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah
Yes. You were manilupating stats. So he manipulated ours. Our first team defense played 14 games last year. In those 14 games they gave up 14.4 points per game. Which was significantly better than your first team defense did. It isn't rocket science, but then again as a Skins fan, perhaps simple math qualifies as rocket science.
FACTS:
1. The taterskins defense gave up less points than the Philly D did last year. Overall the taterskins AS A TEAM gave up 265 points last year while the Eagles gave up 260. However, Philly had one TD scored against it because of an int. Six TDs were scored against the 'Skins while the defense was not on the field (one PR, one KR, one int, and three fumbles). So, therefore, the Eagles D surrendered 253 pts or 15.8 pts/game, and the 'Skins D only gave up 223 pts (tied with the Steelers for least in the league) or 13.9 pts/game. Therefore, statistically the taterskins defense was better than the Philly D in EVERY statistical category.
:-o
bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah
Go ahead and hang your hat on that, then.
Your offense will probably double the points it gives up this year, and the defense will frustratedly give up midway through the season. So, the Skins will give up about 17-18 points per game, but you'll come back here and try to magically turn it into 10 points a game with your fuzzy math.
Your team sucks. All of it. The defense only slightly sucks less than the rest.
Quote from: rjs246 on September 06, 2005, 05:37:20 PM
bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah
what the hail are you a damn sheep?
This is even more sad because you were the only eagle making any sense on this thread
Quote from: FFatPatt on September 06, 2005, 05:38:55 PM
Go ahead and hang your hat on that, then.
Your offense will probably double the points it gives up this year, and the defense will frustratedly give up midway through the season. So, the Skins will give up about 17-18 points per game, but you'll come back here and try to magically turn it into 10 points a game with your fuzzy math.
Your team sucks. All of it. The defense only slightly sucks less than the rest.
Fuzzy math? Any fans with an ounce of dignity would just agree that our defense gave up less points than your team.
Even when you remove your worst two games, that is sad
How can you honestly sit here and HONESTLY believe that you have any leg to stand on by trying to make it seem like the Skins are better at ANYTHING than the Eagles?
Until the Skins show that they can actually have a winning record, shut the farg up with your "we're better than you" attitude. Because there is not one aspect of the game that SKins fans can HONESTLY say their team is better at.
Not one.
Single
Aspect.
I was illustrating that you are talking nonsense. Your defense allowed fewer points. And look and what it got you. Six whole wins. Good for you. You win this meaningless argument. Meanwhile you're team still sucks ass. But we're all very happy for you. Really. Gold star.
Dignity? DIGNITY?
That's rich.
(http://users.erols.com/sevarask/corpevnt/hog.jpg)
lol. this thread is great.
Quote from: FFatPatt on September 06, 2005, 05:48:38 PM
Dignity? DIGNITY?
That's rich.
(http://users.erols.com/sevarask/corpevnt/hog.jpg)
lmfao!!
I'd even say this douche (http://www.wzlhed.com/shawn-eagles-mask.jpg) has more dignity than any taterskins fan.
Well that didn't take much...
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 06, 2005, 05:43:21 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on September 06, 2005, 05:37:20 PM
bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah bah
what the hail are you a damn sheep?
This is even more sad because you were the only eagle making any sense on this thread
Quote from: FFatPatt on September 06, 2005, 05:38:55 PM
Go ahead and hang your hat on that, then.
Your offense will probably double the points it gives up this year, and the defense will frustratedly give up midway through the season. So, the Skins will give up about 17-18 points per game, but you'll come back here and try to magically turn it into 10 points a game with your fuzzy math.
Your team sucks. All of it. The defense only slightly sucks less than the rest.
Fuzzy math? Any fans with an ounce of dignity would just agree that our defense gave up less points than your team.
Even when you remove your worst two games, that is sad
Fine. If it will make you SHUT UP and go back to your own board: The taterskins DEFENSE gave up less points than the Eagles DEFENSE.
OK?
Here's what I ran:
Eagles: 196 points in the 14 games that counted (14 points per game); or 254 in the two extra pre-postseason games (15.88 PPG).
taterskins: 219 points in 16 games (13.69 PPG).
So I will agree: The taterskins gave up less points while their defense was on the field than the Eagles did when theirs was.
However, what variables go into that?
- You gave up four TDs on turnovers, the Eagles just one. How many Eagles turnovers led to opposition scores once the defense took the field.
- You had a TOP advantage over the Eagles (31:19 to 28:26). How many more possessions did the Eagles' opponents have to score?
- The Eagles had 35 points scored on their defense in the 4th quarter in which the team held a multiple-touchdown lead (in this case, 7 vs. Giants week 1, 6 vs. Detroit in week 3, 8 by Carolina in week 6, and 14 by Green Bay in week 13. To be fair, I looked at the taterskins' scores as well, and in only one game did they even win by more than 10 points, that was the Dec. 5 game vs. the Giants. You could also argue the 26-16 win vs. SF when the 49ers scored in the 4th quarter, but then I'd have to go back to the Eagles' schedule and look up more games as well.
So, I freely admit that the taterskins defense gave up less points than the Eagles. Did that make them a "better" defense? Not in my opinion. The Eagles had large, comfortable leads (10 or more points) in at least 9 of their wins last year, lead in which the defense could easily have played their 2nd, or even some 3rd stringers, and gave up some garbage TDs. The taterskins, who only won two games all season by 10 or more points in which a 2nd string defense could even be a factor.
So I will acquiesce: The taterskins' defense gave up less points. The Eagles won more games. Satisfied?
Quote from: FFatPatt on September 06, 2005, 05:55:32 PM
I'd even say this douche (http://www.wzlhed.com/shawn-eagles-mask.jpg) has more dignity than any taterskins fan.
Good Gawd!! That icehole doesn't just ride down the freeway with shoulderpads on, but he
eats chicken wings with them on too?!?!?!One can only wonder if he ever takes them off. What a steaming pile he is.
Quote from: Geowhizzer on September 06, 2005, 06:09:46 PM
The taterskins' defense gave up less points. The Eagles won more games. Satisfied?
Not just
more games Geo, how about
over twice as many games! Not to mention that two of them were over the Deadskins. I have a question for ya', Bigskinballer, when was the last time the Eagles actually lost to the Skins? Bet you'll have to look that one up it was sooooo long ago. :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
Really though, I ask you, has anyone else ever seen grown men that are fans of any other team other than the Skins, grown men who obviously love pork, dress up like women and go to a football game?
For that matter, I don't think I've ever seen any fan in the stands for another team wearing shoulderpads either..... but at least it's shoulder pads with pants and not a freakin' dress.
A lot of my friends from High School went to UVA. They used to all get dressed up in collared shirts and ties and shtein tp go to the football games. That was pretty much as foreign to me as dressing up as a woman for football. I went to Penn State. Wearing good clothes to tailgate for a game would have meant the end of those clothes. Period.
Quote from: MURP on September 06, 2005, 05:48:45 PM
lol. this thread is great.
It's everything I dreamed of & more.
All it's missing is a personal visit from Da' Maya of FedEx field. :-D
Here's my favorite stat from last year. Everyone misses the point when they are hand-wringing about TOP and rushing yards against - the Eagles let the other team kill the clock. This is the "bendability index", indicating the number of yards a team had to move the ball to score a point - I extended it to see plays per point (more plays indicates fewer yards per play, more wasted time)
Top 10:
team Yds/Pt Ply/Pt
Philadelphia 19.7 4.0
New England 19.2 3.8
New York (A) 18.7 3.7
Baltimore 17.9 3.7
Washington 16.1 3.7
Pittsburgh 16.5 3.5
Jacksonville 18.3 3.5
Buffalo 14.8 3.5
Tampa Bay 15.0 3.2
WTF does this have to do with anything? It doesn't, but it is another category where the Eagles are better than the foreskins.
C
Quote from: Beermonkey on September 06, 2005, 10:29:39 PM
Quote from: MURP on September 06, 2005, 05:48:45 PM
lol. this thread is great.
It's everything I dreamed of & more.
All it's missing is a personal visit from Da' Maya of FedEx field. :-D
He's giving MDS lessons on collar-popping.
And he's probably busy organizing the DTC's tailgate wardrobe. Gotta represent with the handwritten headbands, backwards jersey's, receivers gloves and bullhorns
By the way...
Joey The Leg was on SAS's show last night with Salisbury. Theisman reiterated his Skins pick to go to the NFCCG and after SAS and Salisbury fell off their chairs and the audience stopped laughing Salisbury said that he would walk from Bristol, CT to Washington DC in the dead of winter and raise money for charity and match the amount raised dollar for dollar if the Skins go to the NFCCG this year.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on September 07, 2005, 08:45:55 AM
By the way...
Joey The Leg was on SAS's show last night with Salisbury. Theisman reiterated his Skins pick to go to the NFCCG and after SAS and Salisbury fell off their chairs and the audience stopped laughing Salisbury said that he would walk from Bristol, CT to Washington DC in the dead of winter and raise money for charity and match the amount raised dollar for dollar if the Skins go to the NFCCG this year.
how can this guy SERIOUSLY believe that? I think Art is Breakaleg.
I'd say that Salisbury is in no danger of making that walk.
Quote from: rjs246 on September 07, 2005, 08:47:39 AM
I'd say that Salisbury is in no danger of making that walk.
Way to go out on a limb there, buddy :-D
Pointing out the obvious is one of my skills.
(http://www.stupidscifi.com/mambo/images/stories/captainobvious.jpg)
I watched that too (God help me).
Salisbury wiped the floor with Theismann all night long.
If any taterskins fan EVER questions whether Joe Leg is a pathetic homer ever again, all we'll need do is point to that prognostication for undeniable proof. Just embarrassing.
:-D
One of my friends got hired as a beer man at Fedex Field. Even the dopes in control of that make poor decisions. taterskins suck.
This guys Burns got the play-calling duties after a few games last year. Apparently their slight offensive improvement at the end of last year coincided with Gibbs giving up the play-calling duties. :-D :-D
Quote
Burns Will Keep Role As Primary Play Caller
Washington Post
By Nunyo Demasio
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, September 8, 2005; E12
The move was made with so little fanfare toward the end of last season that the Washington taterskins' quarterbacks initially had no idea: Coach Joe Gibbs had relinquished his role as the primary play caller to Jack Burns, who was then the quarterbacks coach.
But the decision was significant -- Gibbs had always called plays during his 12 years as an NFL coach -- and it coincided with an improved offense as Gibbs also made alterations to his schemes.
This week, Gibbs confirmed that the team would use the same setup: Burns -- an offensive consultant who has been replaced by Bill Musgrave as quarterbacks coach -- will call the initial play after occasional input from offensive coordinator Don Breaux.
Gibbs said that the main reason was to streamline his responsibilities and be better organized on game day. He remains the ultimate authority in play calling and can veto any recommendation.
"I kind of went through a thing there of what's the best way to be organized on game day," Gibbs said. "And I feel like Jack and Don had a good feel. So the way we're set up now, I'm real comfortable with it. They are upstairs [in the booth]. They get big input. They make a lot of the decisions there. And then I'm the last guy to make the call when it goes in. But I certainly depend a lot on them. They've done a great job."
Washington's offensive assistants communicate via headsets, but Gibbs is the only coach with the ability to speak into his quarterback's earpiece. So when the change was made late last season, quarterbacks Patrick Ramsey and Mark Brunell were unaware for a few games.
For most of last season, Breaux had been on the sideline near Gibbs while Burns sat in the booth to provide strategy. When the change occurred with about six games left, Breaux moved upstairs with Burns.
After Gibbs listens to the initial call, he decides whether to make a change. When asked how often the recommendation will make it through, Gibbs responded: "Well, you certainly have to give them a lot of the credit. Let's put it that way."
Yesterday, Burns played down the move: "Two heads are better than one. Joe has got a very keen eye right there on the sideline. And I can be in the press box and see things that maybe he can't see at the time. It's a real good working relationship, and we feel like it's going to be positive for our players. He's fabulous at adjusting during the game. If Joe has a strong feeling about something, that's great."
Most primary play callers in the NFL are offensive coordinators, although some head coaches have dual roles. But the change is new for Gibbs, his longtime assistant acknowledged.
"Joe will do whatever he deems necessary to turn this around," tight ends coach Rennie Simmons said. "Maybe Joe didn't know how he would feel [initially]. But he feels comfortable doing that, so we're staying with it."
Art (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=113137)
QuoteThe character of Gibbs in his team really came through there. Where past taterskins teams would take shots and fold, this team took them, and delivered greater. That game turned. We began to dominate the Eagles. The defense playing so physical as to turn Owens from north-south to, get out of bounds.
The defense took over. The team took what Philly does to everyone -- intimidates through athleticism and an explosive physical nauture -- and got them to back down as we stepped up. The game, here was one we had, until Ramsey makes the most inconceivable of throws and it's over. If Ramsey just manages himself there, we tie it (at least) and win, because the Eagles were done offensively. Five consecutive three play drives signaled they wanted out of the game.
Maybe that was smart of them, with so much to play for, silently packing it in to avoid getting hurt. But, it also showed the weakness in character of the Eagles. The Eagles deliver shots and expect you to fall. They are Apollo Creed. When you stand up and hit them back, they falter, tense up, and resemble nothing of the team they looked like earlier.
Did that retard just compare the Skins to Rocky? I mean, seriously? :sly
What a farging toolbag. Yea, we quit.
I'm still laughing at his post. Seriously.
Yeah the Eagles folded the tents and were scared off by the big bad taterskins. :-D
Those taterskins were awesome in that game. Look at how their drives turned out.
Touchdown
Punt
Punt
Punt
Punt
Missed FG
Punt
Punt
Punt
Touchdown
Punt
Punt
Interception
Downs
Wow, they totally had the Eagles on their heels with that offensive performance. I mean, if it wasn't for Dawkins cheating and stealing the ball they totally would have won. They were firing on all cylinders, baby!
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on September 10, 2005, 08:32:10 PM
Art (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=113137)
QuoteThe character of Gibbs in his team really came through there. Where past taterskins teams would take shots and fold, this team took them, and delivered greater. That game turned. We began to dominate the Eagles. The defense playing so physical as to turn Owens from north-south to, get out of bounds.
The defense took over. The team took what Philly does to everyone -- intimidates through athleticism and an explosive physical nauture -- and got them to back down as we stepped up. The game, here was one we had, until Ramsey makes the most inconceivable of throws and it's over. If Ramsey just manages himself there, we tie it (at least) and win, because the Eagles were done offensively. Five consecutive three play drives signaled they wanted out of the game.
Maybe that was smart of them, with so much to play for, silently packing it in to avoid getting hurt. But, it also showed the weakness in character of the Eagles. The Eagles deliver shots and expect you to fall. They are Apollo Creed. When you stand up and hit them back, they falter, tense up, and resemble nothing of the team they looked like earlier.
:-D That is too funny.
What a
(http://homepages.tig.com.au/~cec/loser.jpg)
:-D And that win would've propelled the Skins to the top of the NFC and into the Super Bowl, where the surely would've demolished the feble Patriots.
Well, they were the last team to beat the Pats before they went on that wicked awesome winning streak.
Quote from: General_Failure on September 10, 2005, 08:45:10 PM
Those taterskins were awesome in that game. Look at how their drives turned out.
Touchdown
Punt
Punt
Punt
Punt
Missed FG
Punt
Punt
Punt
Touchdown
Punt
Punt
Interception
Downs
Wow, they totally had the Eagles on their heels with that offensive performance. I mean, if it wasn't for Dawkins cheating and stealing the ball they totally would have won. They were firing on all cylinders, baby!
Offensive juggernauts, those taterskins. How oh how will our defense stop such a phenominal unit from reaching the endzone?
We need to put a hit out on their punter. He's just too good.
That's Simoneau's job this year. He needs to do something to earn his money.
Actually he needs to do that to Josh Miller, the Pats punter. The punt he made to pin us back inside the 5 at the end of the game was sick.
The fact that you know his name worries me. I don't know why.
The Marlins announcer is named Tommy Hutton. I wondered if it was THE Tommy Hutton, but sadly, it's not.
Quote from: MDS on September 10, 2005, 09:01:45 PM
The Marlins announcer is named Tommy Hutton. I wondered if it was THE Tommy Hutton, but sadly, it's not.
Former Phil outfielder Tommy Hutton.
How many of this guy is there out there?
1 too many. The punter needs to do the right thing and end it.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on September 10, 2005, 08:50:16 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on September 10, 2005, 08:45:10 PM
Those taterskins were awesome in that game. Look at how their drives turned out.
Touchdown
Punt
Punt
Punt
Punt
Missed FG
Punt
Punt
Punt
Touchdown
Punt
Punt
Interception
Downs
Wow, they totally had the Eagles on their heels with that offensive performance. I mean, if it wasn't for Dawkins cheating and stealing the ball they totally would have won. They were firing on all cylinders, baby!
Offensive juggernauts, those taterskins. How oh how will our defense stop such a phenominal unit from reaching the endzone?
I'm not sure which one, but one of those punts came on a drive where the Skins had first and goal at one point. Something like:
Penalty
Sack
Penalty
Penalty
No gain
No gain
Punt
:-D
Yeah, but it was totally that interception that kept them from winning.
Ramsey looked absolutely horrid, got clotheslined, and now Brunnel is in. Brunnel throws a pick with his second attempt and gets a BS PI call.
haha, how can you BARELY squeak out a win against a terrible Bears team with a rookie at QB?
Pathetic.
Art on the game. Started his own thread, that no one has responded to, because he is just that big of a taterskins fan.
QuoteThis game was not really in doubt the moment Grossman went down with injury. The Chicago Bears had no chance of winning a game against a Gregg Williams defense with a rookie QB making his first start on the road. Today, you clearly felt there was no way the Bears could do anything against our defense. We set them up for points and the scored, but, for the most part, other than a blind falling down pass, the Bears offense was going to be and WAS hopeless against the taterskins defense.
Washington has a championship-level defense, coordinated by a top defensive mind. We're going to win games because of that. But, we're not going to be much better than last year with below average QB play by BOTH our QBs as we had today. We're not going to win a lot of games with three turnovers.
We saw today what we could expect to see. We saw an offense with a top runner capable of controlling the game. We saw a dangerous receiver capable of getting loose downfield. We saw a strong, powerful offensive line. And we had QB play where Brunell had a 70.5 QB rating and Ramsey had a 49.4 rating. We will lose games with play like that.
Just not against teams with no hope against our defense. Any team with a remote bit of ability on offense beats us today because we don't put teams away and limit mistakes. We haven't for a very long time. It's frustrating to see the same errors over and over and over and over. It is the definition of our team.
If we ever turn the corner where the mistakes don't define us, but smart, controlled, solid play does, we will be deadly with the ability to create on offense and dominate on defense. We just never seem to get closer to this lofty goal.
This win was unsatisfying because we never seem to improve the one aspect of play that most limits our ability to win. But, winning does give us a bit of momentum to build on. This team is one run of a few wins away from believing it can achieve what it hasn't achieved. You can't start a run until you win one .
At least he recognizes that the QBs look like shtein.
But until they do it against more than Kyle Orton...I'll wait to judge. I know Gregg Williams' group is good but if a veteran QB and/or potent offense was playing them today they lose.
9-7? I see that Gibbs has turned that Offense around. :P
Quote from: TexasEagle on September 11, 2005, 05:40:10 PM
9-7? I see that Gibbs has turned that Offense around. :P
But... but... but they held the mighty Bears offense to seven points!
John Hall is hurt and Gibbs said they need another kicker.
Sign Jimmy Kibble!
Hall is hurt every year.
There are gonna be some awful kickers in the NFC East. The Cowboys use Jose Cortez. :-D
Damn...a thread on the ExtremeSkins site says that Jansen broke his other thumb today too. That sucks for them. He's their best OL. If he is out for any time then they'll have to plug Ray Brown back in there.
I feel so bad for them. So bad.
Did you see they lined Sean Taylor up at WR?
Yea :-D Thats really gonna help them score more points.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on September 11, 2005, 05:48:52 PM
Damn...a thread on the ExtremeSkins site says that Jansen broke his other thumb today too. That sucks for them. He's their best OL. If he is out for any time then they'll have to plug Ray Brown back in there.
He was playing.
QuoteIn reading this column by La Canfora, I find myself torn as to what I'm seeing. I find no flaw with the premise of his column. Presumably the Post realizing the potency this board has is trying to marry up well with my vastly powerful words, and Jason's column echos my comments after the game and during that we are a team far too prone to self-defeating issues than we ought to be if we expect any real success.
This is not the first time the Post has had to copy me for guidance in producing work and I credit them for so closely trying to be me. The problem is, they CAN'T be me . You see, I'm a fan. I can write the column above and not raise any eyebrows. Wilbon can write this column and not raise any eyebrows. La Canfora is a beat reporter for the Washington taterskins. The team is his beat.
It is HIGHLY unusual from a journalistic standpoint to see a beat reporter branching out to provide opinions in the form of a column. The Washington Post is seriously threatened by this board and what the team is doing -- which is true -- and/or they have simply forgotten basic journalism rules.
You can not have a beat reporter offering opinions and analysis. A beat reporter must detach himself from the team and report facts. This column could have been done in the proper manner, but, La Canfora didn't. I'm just not sure what he and the Post are thinking. This is a pet peeve of mine. I've always had a problem with Paul Woody doing the same thing even within game articles.
Some part of this being allowed by the Post is to respond to the fact they are being beaten silly by the team in releasing the news about the team. And, given they read here all the time -- enough even to know my "rambling" posts aren't as good as my columns -- it is pretty clear they are trying to bridge the "fan" gap by taking our thoughts and packaging them as their own.
Even if this isn't true, I'm going to stick with it .
Again, I have no problem with the words. I do think they are better left to a columnist or better written as a news story if the beat writer is doing it. In fact, this could be a very good news story given the resonance it would have with Gibbs. It just irks me to see the Post allowing this sort of unprofessional thing from a beat writer. Worse, I like Jason a lot, but, as a beat reporter he should be ethically more sound than he appears to be and refuse to write a column on the beat he covers.
He may aspire to do columns. But, you don't write them on your beat. It destroys your credibility as a beat reporter. And Jason actually HAD credibility left. Nunyo has become a profile writer since he lost his credibility .
:-D :-D :-D
Art is hilarious.
That guy's got his head shoved pretty far up that ass of his.
I went to sleep at 7 am and woke up at 12 excited for football. This game almost put me back to sleep. I thought maybe I could get a good laugh out of the game, but they were so bad it was just depressing. What is even more pathetic is that they won. The Bears are even worse. The Bears had this game, if they didn't get 3 false starts in a row though.
I can't believe my eyes...
Skins fans are pissed at Saint Joe!
Even a few of them say he should be fired if he benches Patrick Ramsey for Mark Brunell.
Honestly it doesn't matter which one plays because they're going to eat ass either way. But it looks like the Sainthood is wearing off for Mr. NASCAR.
They're not true fans.
Watching the game yesterday, it's fairly obvious that the Bears are having some issues on offense considering Orton's a rook and all. If they could get their running game going it would take a lot of pressure off of the guy. That being said, the Skins defense played pretty well. The Bears defense is really freakin good though. Sure Portis had a bunch of yards, but that happens when the defense is on the field the whole game.
that Lance Briggs clothesline was FREAKIN' AWESOME!
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on September 11, 2005, 05:52:01 PM
Did you see they lined Sean Taylor up at WR?
I'd like to see them do that again. Against the Eagles.
And he better pray that no one remembers his 'flying facemask rip' of DMac last season. Because I can think of 3 people in particular who could decapitate that kid if they remember.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on September 12, 2005, 03:23:08 PM
I can't believe my eyes...
Skins fans are pissed at Saint Joe!
Even a few of them say he should be fired if he benches Patrick Ramsey for Mark Brunell.
Honestly it doesn't matter which one plays because they're going to eat ass either way. But it looks like the Sainthood is wearing off for Mr. NASCAR.
Brunell was named starter next week.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=2159642
In Gibbs we trust (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=113687)
Gibbs is a liar (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=113701)
Even if explaning a chat with Gibbs, Art sounds like a farging toolbag:
QuoteWe have the honor of chatting with coach Joe Gibbs. We will be asking your questions. Bear in mind we will have less time with the coach than with Mr. Snyder given that he's coaching and all . We already have more questions asked than he can take. However, if you have something on your mind, please feel free to ask your questions in the following thread:
Art's opinion of himself is greatly inflated. But he provides us with great entertainment.
Good news on Brunell starting! :-D
How long until Jason Campbell is thrown to the wolves?
Quote from: Catapult on September 12, 2005, 04:45:10 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on September 11, 2005, 05:52:01 PM
Did you see they lined Sean Taylor up at WR?
I'd like to see them do that again. Against the Eagles.
And he better pray that no one remembers his 'flying facemask rip' of DMac last season. Because I can think of 3 people in particular who could decapitate that kid if they remember.
I'd cream myself if he caught a ball and had to man up against Trotter or Dawkins.
Ramsey has asked to be traded :-D
For real? :-D
I think he just wants to hold a clipboard for a while, see what it's like to not get knocked around all game.
GET RAMSEY!!!
Yea, there are 10 threads about it. Most of them are saying "fine, farg you, leave."
Blindly support Gibbs.
These are the same people that offered up every excuse in the world for Ramsey. They're exactly like Baltimore fans, only with slightly different male cheerleaders.
Yea, Mort said that on ESPN.
I was cracking up. Ramsey wants out, who's next?
Ooh, maybe they'll trade for Hasselhoff in Seattle!
Quote from: Avenger on September 12, 2005, 06:57:12 PM
Yea, Mort said that on ESPN.
I was cracking up. Ramsey wants out, who's next?
Thrash.
It's only week 2 and that team is already about to crash and burn. I love it.
I'm interested to see what bubba9497 will say about it. He is the biggest Ramsey lover on that MB.
I'd like to see what any of our "resident" Skins fans have to say. It speaks volumes of how bad that team is if none of them have bothered stopping by after their tainted victory.
The next thing to point and laugh at in regards to this latest development will be:
1. The overinflated opinion of Ramsey by Skins fans. They'll want a good player in return like a DE who can actually rush the passer. But they won't get it.
2. When they get a 4th round pick - the reaction by the fans to getting said 4th round pick.
Joe Gibbs' handling of the QB situation is terrible. Almost as bad as "Cheap & Available" Spurrier.
Once he's traded for a 5th round pick they'll praise Gibbs for getting value out of such a worthless player. They'll all be happy that cancer is gone, and they'll be so much better off with Brunell tutoring a real QB.
They're going to trade Ramsey to Baltimore straight up for Kyle Boller.
That would be the best trade ever.
I do hope he goes to Baltimore and becomes a stud. He'd be only 30 miles from Washington and rubbing it in the Skins fans faces.
GET RAMSEY, BILLICK!
On the other hand, we'd have more idiots claiming proof of Billick's genius. Let's wait until he gets fired before we wish them a stud QB.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on September 12, 2005, 07:00:37 PM
I'm interested to see what bubba9497 will say about it. He is the biggest Ramsey lover on that MB.
He had some type of accident & hasn't been on in about a week.
Someone probably told him that one of his roids looks like Gibbs & he broke his neck trying to kiss it.
PS- I hope he's OK..really. :)
Good point, G-Fail. :D
Quote from: Beermonkey on September 12, 2005, 07:17:30 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on September 12, 2005, 07:00:37 PM
I'm interested to see what bubba9497 will say about it. He is the biggest Ramsey lover on that MB.
He had some type of accident & hasn't been on in about a week.
Someone probably told him that one of his roids looks like Gibbs & he broke his neck trying to kiss it.
PS- I hope he's OK..really. :)
:-D
Nah, he's back bro. I read a post from him Saturday night that said Ramsey was going to go off and be a stud this year. That's why I want to see his thoughts on this latest nugget o' info.
Damn you! :-D :-D
I figured your excessive love for the name shortened nicks would shine through. I was trying to help you get street cred! ;D
Too. Freakin. Perfect.
QuoteTo many of us Joe Gibbs is a hero.
He has brought the only glory we've known as fans in most of our lives.
No matter how you feel about Patrick Ramsey being benched, the tenor of the posts on this board has taken me by surprise. What has Patrick Ramsey done to deserve our loyalty above Joe Gibbs? Some of you have simply gone crazy.
The young fans who lack the knowledge of the history may be excused for the statements they are making. Older fans who know better need to be stepping up and helping the youngsters out. Joe Gibbs is a man of strong character and great leadership.
He deserves our benefit of the doubt.
I'm not sure the prospects of Mark Brunell starting are all that thrilling for me either. But, I can not believe the comments some of you are making. When faced with a tough season Joe Gibbs buckled down and worked for our organization.
When faced with a tough decision, Patrick Ramsey asked to be traded.
I know which of the two men I feel I'd rather put my support behind.
Some of you should be ashamed of yourselves.
We don't deserve Gibbs as our coach with the behavior too many of you are showing. At least we know it'll be OUR fault if he leaves and we can't get anyone any good.
Guess who wrote this? :-D
I got mad street cred, yo.
(http://www.worth1000.com/entries/105000/105195QwYU_w.jpg)
GF with street cred. :-D Now that's funny.
Don't you have to make some poor sucker sign over his soul or something, Sassy?
Quote from: MDS on September 12, 2005, 07:23:05 PM
Too. Freakin. Perfect.
QuoteTo many of us Joe Gibbs is a hero.
He has brought the only glory we've known as fans in most of our lives.
No matter how you feel about Patrick Ramsey being benched, the tenor of the posts on this board has taken me by surprise. What has Patrick Ramsey done to deserve our loyalty above Joe Gibbs? Some of you have simply gone crazy.
The young fans who lack the knowledge of the history may be excused for the statements they are making. Older fans who know better need to be stepping up and helping the youngsters out. Joe Gibbs is a man of strong character and great leadership.
He deserves our benefit of the doubt.
I'm not sure the prospects of Mark Brunell starting are all that thrilling for me either. But, I can not believe the comments some of you are making. When faced with a tough season Joe Gibbs buckled down and worked for our organization.
When faced with a tough decision, Patrick Ramsey asked to be traded.
I know which of the two men I feel I'd rather put my support behind.
Some of you should be ashamed of yourselves.
We don't deserve Gibbs as our coach with the behavior too many of you are showing. At least we know it'll be OUR fault if he leaves and we can't get anyone any good.
Guess who wrote this? :-D
I just threw up in my mouth and then laughed.
Disgusting yet funny as hell.
Gotta be Art.
What do I win?
You win a three month supply of Sweet Release, autographed by Joe Gibbs.
What other Gibbs ballgobbler would write that?
You win a night in the booth with the SNF team. Have fun.
Yes! Tis will be my most prized possession!
Mark Brunell....too funny. Yay 8 yard hitch offense!
Quote from: General_Failure on September 12, 2005, 07:25:00 PM
Don't you have to make some poor sucker sign over his soul or something, Sassy?
Nah, I don't take souls.....just 4 years of their lives. :)
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on September 12, 2005, 07:27:26 PM
Yes! Tis will be my most prized possession!
Mark Brunell....too funny. Yay 8 yard hitch offense!
They're up to 8 yards now? Wow, they really did open up the offense this year.
Quote from: MDS on September 12, 2005, 07:27:03 PM
What other Gibbs ballgobbler would write that?
You win a night in the booth with the SNF team. Have fun.
Excellent. Now I can learn to talk like Mike Patrick, stab Joe Theisman and shave half of Paul Maguire's mustache off so they don't show him on TV anymore.
Quote from: General_Failure on September 12, 2005, 07:28:24 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on September 12, 2005, 07:27:26 PM
Yes! Tis will be my most prized possession!
Mark Brunell....too funny. Yay 8 yard hitch offense!
They're up to 8 yards now? Wow, they really did open up the offense this year.
Yeah..those studs Santana Moss and David Patten are the shiz.
It's been too long since someone said h-back. H-baaaaaaaaack!
Quote from: MDS on September 12, 2005, 06:48:09 PM
Ramsey has asked to be traded :-D
Guess Sack Ramsey couldn't stand being a part of that awesome offense. :-D
Gardner, Coles, Ramsey....who's next? Jansen? Samuels? 8)
Hmmm....so I guess you pole-smoking homers would rather lose 14-10 than win 9-7.......enjoy solo possession of last place, iceholes.
Quote from: absinthe1023 on September 13, 2005, 01:14:52 AM
Hmmm....so I guess you pole-smoking homers would rather lose 14-10 than win 9-7.......enjoy solo possession of last place, iceholes.
:-D :-D
The Eagles wanted to feel like the taterskins for a week.
14-10 against Vick and we played like shtein and still barely lost.
You fargin losers played Kyle Orton and the offensive juggernaut Bears.
How's Patrick Ramsey, by the way? Go farging kill yourself.
Quote from: absinthe1023 on September 13, 2005, 01:14:52 AM
Hmmm....so I guess you pole-smoking homers would rather lose 14-10 than win 9-7.......enjoy solo possession of last place, iceholes.
Don't worry..Once Mark Brutal throws for his 50 yards and you lose to the Cokeboys for the 15th straight time, it's back to the bottom for you.
Quote from: absinthe1023 on September 13, 2005, 01:14:52 AM
Hmmm....so I guess you pole-smoking homers would rather lose 14-10 than win 9-7.......enjoy solo possession of last place, iceholes.
3 Lombaris and counting, eh? How about we go with something a little more modern.
How about 14 straight losses to Dallas and counting. Or....
6 straight seasons without a playoff appearance and counting. Or....
3 head coaches in the last 5 years and counting. Or....
8 starting quarterbacks in the last 4 years and counting. Or....
Well, you get the picture. Come back after week 17 and we'll see where our 2 teams stand.
or 7 straight games losing to the Eagles.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 13, 2005, 07:35:13 AM
or 7 straight games losing to the Eagles.
You forgot to say "and counting." Sheesh, get with it. Slacker. ;)
Patrick Ramsey is getting farged again. It's just amazing. The taterskins haven't done a single thing right by him. Now that Brunell is the starter again, Ramsey is requesting a trade. If I'm him, I demand a trade. And if they won't give it, I would support him in any effort to get cut.
I don't think he gets his trade. Who wants him?
Quote from: Sgt PSN on September 12, 2005, 07:11:19 PM
They're going to trade Ramsey to Baltimore straight up for Kyle Boller.
:-D :-D :-D :-D Yeah! Even after Boller was injured!!
QuoteGentlemen, this thread is about our coach. Not Brunell. Not Ramsey. This thread is about Joe Gibbs.
The man is our coach, our leader, and in many ways our best friend. And this is why I am totally devastated by the responses that our fans have displayed on this message board today about our coach.
This simple matter is that winning is all that counts. I am a Ramsey supporter. And I think Ramsey is now/ or will become a good quarterback. However, my love for the taterskins trumps all. A lot are saying that Ramsey was handled unprofessionally by Gibbs. How can you say this? Do you know what the coach is seeing? Can you see what the coaches have seen?
I mean no disrespect for our fans. In particular, I mean no disrespect for the diehard fans who post on this message board. I would simply say that Marv levy had it right.
"Once a coach starts listening to the fans and the media, he will soon become one."
Joe is not here to please the fans by virtue of his decision making. He is here to win ball games and more importantly, to get us in position to be productive in the post-season. If you need a refresher course in what Joe Gibbsd inherited then look at the 2005 version of the undisciplined Oakland Raiders. Or better yet, take some time to read the headlines from the Steve Spurrier era. Guys, ships do not turn on a dime.
Please leave the coaching to the coaches. And leave the fans to cheering. Joe Gibbs will be soon having us cheering. And no post nor thought on this message board will have a more positive effect on this team then allowing Joe Gibbs to do what Joe Gibbs has been hired to do.
:-D
Ummmm... Gibbs may want to look into protection from this stalker. :sly
Holy hell, is that guy funny!
Now, that's scary...
Quote from: TexasEagle on September 13, 2005, 06:37:20 PM
Now, that's scary...
No. Scary is that they walk around down here in droves. They are like the holy rollers. If you are a "non-believer" they make it their mission to convert you. If you root for
any other team, and you don't see the light, they bash you every chance they get. In work, wherever.
They call into talk shows and spew this shtein, and the hosts laugh at them to no end. Just today the "Sports Reporters" on Sportstalk 980 (ESPN) were
actually citing the "Extremeskins.com" boards and calling them nuts and borderline stalkers :-D. All day at work today they were coming by my office, clutch their chests, and moaning (ala McNabb) and asking if we will ever get a trophy, or a seat at the table.
Much like the bible thumpers, they are completely brainwashed into dump their moneys into a shtein product because it's gets shiny during the offseason., and no matter what evidence you bring to bear, no matter how convincing, they coninue to spew shtein.
I hate living here. :boom
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on September 13, 2005, 05:45:16 PM
QuoteGentlemen, this thread is about our coach. Not Brunell. Not Ramsey. This thread is about Joe Gibbs.
The man is our coach, our leader, and in many ways our best friend. And this is why I am totally devastated by the responses that our fans have displayed on this message board today about our coach.
This simple matter is that winning is all that counts. I am a Ramsey supporter. And I think Ramsey is now/ or will become a good quarterback. However, my love for the taterskins trumps all. A lot are saying that Ramsey was handled unprofessionally by Gibbs. How can you say this? Do you know what the coach is seeing? Can you see what the coaches have seen?
I mean no disrespect for our fans. In particular, I mean no disrespect for the diehard fans who post on this message board. I would simply say that Marv levy had it right.
"Once a coach starts listening to the fans and the media, he will soon become one."
Joe is not here to please the fans by virtue of his decision making. He is here to win ball games and more importantly, to get us in position to be productive in the post-season. If you need a refresher course in what Joe Gibbsd inherited then look at the 2005 version of the undisciplined Oakland Raiders. Or better yet, take some time to read the headlines from the Steve Spurrier era. Guys, ships do not turn on a dime.
Please leave the coaching to the coaches. And leave the fans to cheering. Joe Gibbs will be soon having us cheering. And no post nor thought on this message board will have a more positive effect on this team then allowing Joe Gibbs to do what Joe Gibbs has been hired to do.
:-D
I'm bettin the house that thats Arthur C. Gibbsucker
I had to share this with you all. Someone copied a post from the DTC on the CPND board. It documented their first tailgate, including how the one guy was the FIRST ONE there. Anyway, it included a link to pictures of the tailgate.
It is THE mother lode of dorkiness. It's like shots from every nerd movie ever made collected on one site. I was looking at them all, and came across this one with the caption "lady sapperton 1 resized" I was thinking, what the...and clicked on it. Here's what I saw.
(http://image58.webshots.com/158/0/21/6/450202106RTJpbJ_ph.jpg)
I guess that's for when the girls they partied with say, "Thanks for the beer guys, gotta go."
http://community.webshots.com/user/deadtreecrew/0
as if they had girls there.
:-D
Word.(http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/7698/img15326ex.jpg)
Quote from: EJ72 on September 14, 2005, 12:41:52 AM
I had to share this with you all. Someone copied a post from the DTC on the CPND board. It documented their first tailgate, including how the one guy was the FIRST ONE there. Anyway, it included a link to pictures of the tailgate.
It is THE mother lode of dorkiness. It's like shots from every nerd movie ever made collected on one site. I was looking at them all, and came across this one with the caption "lady sapperton 1 resized" I was thinking, what the...and clicked on it. Here's what I saw.
(http://image58.webshots.com/158/0/21/6/450202106RTJpbJ_ph.jpg)
I guess that's for when the girls they partied with say, "Thanks for the beer guys, gotta go."
http://community.webshots.com/user/deadtreecrew/0
One is titled, Kurt and FL Girls. I did some complicated editing to show who is who. I wonder if those girls actually know Kurt?
(http://img286.imageshack.us/img286/1838/450203830hbwuqcph9fq.jpg)
What I wouldn't give to be that arrow...
Some rich Skins fans rented hookers for his tailgate.
That's so cute.
Quote from: rjs246 on September 14, 2005, 01:41:36 PM
What I wouldn't give to be that arrow...
The one pointing at Kurt? You wanna have sex with his butt-chin don't ya?
They found a black guy and a Dominican to give them street cred. Super.
Only a little bit.
I can't wait to tell Yeti that Kurt managed to escape his tether.
Home skillets (http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/7698/img15326ex.jpg)
actual conversation I had with my buddy that sent me the pic:
QuoteFFatPatt - the guy on the left doesn't look like a poseur
FFatPatt - he doesn't fit in
paco - thats their dad... someone had to drive the kids to the game
paco - They were tailgating out of his minivan
yep, the dude's mom is seen in one of them cooking them burgers too
Those Vienna, Virginia thugs sure are hard.
That one dude is killin that Gatorade
Quote from: phattymatty on September 14, 2005, 02:04:36 PM
That one dude is killin that Gatorade
White boy's rockin' a Natty light, though. Represent.
Anyone know how those bozo's came up with the name 'DeadTreeCrew'? ???
Quote from: SD_Eagle on September 14, 2005, 02:10:27 PM
Anyone know how those bozo's came up with the name 'DeadTreeCrew'? ???
Because the place they tailgate at is so far away from the stadium there's woods around them.
They tailgate by some dead tree next to one of the lots outside of FedEx. Also, their wangs are flaccid.
Wow
Quote from: rjs246 on September 14, 2005, 01:41:36 PM
What I wouldn't give to be that arrow...
Gotta admit, that's a fine collection of ass. Almost Alba-quality ass...
C
(http://www.staticfiends.com/suburbia/files/thumbs/t_jessica_alba_ass_2.jpg)
Quote from: FFatPatt on September 14, 2005, 02:32:18 PM
(http://www.staticfiends.com/suburbia/files/thumbs/t_jessica_alba_ass_2.jpg)
Ok, maybe not :drool
:-D :-D :-D
The dude holdin the Natty Lite...he's wearing Officer Poncharello sunglasses.
The backwards jersey's are the coolest.
MDS,
The person who wrote that was not Arthur F. Gibbstaintlicker...it was some dude named portisizzle
My second guess was Bubba, another one of this Gibbsuckers.
That's right, we bad. You want fries with that, FOOL?!
(http://home.comcast.net/~dklink913/mcskins.jpg)
What is that, rock scissors paper to see who gets to use the big gold butt plug first?
Jersey on backwards again.
www.wiggaz.com
::)
Jon Jansen is playing this week with a cast on each arm. That should be interesting.
Quote from: rjs246 on September 16, 2005, 09:38:51 AM
Jon Jansen is playing this week with a cast on each arm. That should be interesting.
...and this is about as healthy as he's been this "deep" into the season.
Who gets to a 1000 yards first? Portis or Brunell. :-D
Quote from: rjs246 on September 16, 2005, 09:38:51 AM
Jon Jansen is playing this week with a cast on each arm. That should be interesting.
I wonder if some taterskins fans have eagerly volunteered to wipe his ass for him?
Quote from: EJ72 on September 16, 2005, 01:03:41 AM
That's right, we bad. You want fries with that, FOOL?!
(http://home.comcast.net/~dklink913/mcskins.jpg)
:-D
You're alright for a Pokes fan.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on September 16, 2005, 08:15:42 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on September 16, 2005, 09:38:51 AM
Jon Jansen is playing this week with a cast on each arm. That should be interesting.
I wonder if some taterskins fans have eagerly volunteered to wipe his ass for him?
Tongues are lined up around the block for that honor.
Quote from: Larry on September 16, 2005, 12:53:47 PM
Who gets to a 1000 yards first? Portis or Brunell. :-D
Portis... He's already winning: 121 yards rushing vs. 70 yards passing.
Quote from: EJ72 on September 16, 2005, 01:03:41 AM
That's right, we bad. You want fries with that, FOOL?!
(http://home.comcast.net/~dklink913/mcskins.jpg)
:-D
The Hamburgla is totally hot for Mayor McCheese. Look at him staring at his nipples.
The guy on the left of FF's pic, (Dad), looks to be the only normal person in the pic. I love it when you see guys with shorts and short sleeve shirts and then theres the one guy with his hood up like its winter or sumthin'. :-D Maybe he's having a bad hair day.
Quote from: General_Failure on September 16, 2005, 11:45:55 PM
The Hamburgla is totally hot for Mayor McCheese. Look at him staring at his nipples.
And playing pocket pool at the same time.
Wicka' wicka' wicka'!!
(http://www.moviecitynews.com/reviews/DVD/images/2004/fonzie.jpg)(http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2005/09/16/PH2005091602268.jpg)
This comparison bags me up :-D
:-D LMFAO
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy! :yay
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on September 17, 2005, 10:55:03 AM
(http://www.moviecitynews.com/reviews/DVD/images/2004/fonzie.jpg)(http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2005/09/16/PH2005091602268.jpg)
This comparison bags me up :-D
:yay :yay Or, in Jansen's case, :boo :boo
What's the over/under how how many times he gets called for holding?
How does he wipe his ass?
Quote from: General_Failure on September 16, 2005, 10:21:44 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on September 16, 2005, 08:15:42 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on September 16, 2005, 09:38:51 AM
Jon Jansen is playing this week with a cast on each arm. That should be interesting.
I wonder if some taterskins fans have eagerly volunteered to wipe his ass for him?
Tongues are lined up around the block for that honor.
Just how EVER does he find the time?
I'd think since his lips were permanently attached to Gibbs' hole, he'd be otherwise preoccupied.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 17, 2005, 05:33:37 PM
How does he wipe his ass?
(http://drinkthis.typepad.com/main/images/joegibbs.jpg)
Is that Abe Vigoda?
Arthur Mills, aka Ms. Joe Gibbs, wrote another crappy Gibbs/taterskins suckfest article from taterskins.com. It's too long and boring to fully post, so I'll just link the stupid article here (http://www.taterskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=10335) if you want to waste 2 minutes of your life reading it. HowEVA, his allegiance to the godly figure atop mount taterskin as on full display in this most recent pile of shtein
QuoteLet me see if I have this straight.
A Hall of Fame head coach known for winning three Super Bowls with three different starting quarterbacks benches a starting quarterback and the immediate question is, "What's wrong with the head coach?"
I'm sorry. I just don't get how that question is the one at the forefront of every column written since Joe Gibbs announced he was switching starting quarterbacks.
QuoteGibbs deserved our trust--trust he's earned--that whether Brunell plays well or poorly the move was based on his thoughtful belief it gives the team the best chance to win. Somehow, inconceivably, Ramsey's demotion has been met with the suggestion that a coach who won championships with three different quarterbacks suddenly has no concept of what it takes at the position to win.
QuoteBy demoting Ramsey, Gibbs isn't saying he knows the answer.
He's saying he suspects the answer isn't Ramsey. At least not now.
For a head coach with his track record, you'd think that statement would inspire someone to ask the question, "What's wrong with the starting quarterback?"
It's a wonder that hasn't been more noticeable.
:puke
Quote from: General_Failure on September 18, 2005, 01:15:07 AM
Is that Abe Vigoda?
Hey. Don't be insulting Abe like that. ;)
Abe was entertaining, Gibbs is just an anomaly in the chain of evolution.(http://www.dallascowboyscentral.com/forums/images/smilies/geek.gif)
Quote from: MDSBy demoting Ramsey, Gibbs isn't saying he knows the answer.
If I were Ramsey, I would be telling the whole organization in no uncertain terms to kiss my ass. First they jerk him around his rookie season with Matthews and Wuerffel. In and out all year long. In '03 he never got his job back from Hasselbeck after a concussion. Last year they screw him over in favor of Brunell, only to come crawling back to him in the 2nd half. Now this.
If he were drafted by a team that didn't have a bunch of yahoos coaching and running things, he could be a good QB.
He'd at least be Boller.
Seriously. I think that guy has mental problems. The love for Joe Gibbs is borderline "go look in your kitchen, Joe. There's a boiling bunny rabbit" psycho.
Joe Gibbs is overrated. Bobby Beathard is the guy who assembled that great talent which Gibbs parlayed into a HOF bust. Players and talent trump coaching anyday (hence the successes of Ditka, Switzer & Madden among others); and the former is the domain of the GM/front office, something that the current Skins lack.
He's another Tom Flores in my book.
>:D
I can't believe I'm rooting for Dallas tonight.
I can't believe you're not rooting for a terrorist attack tonight.
I'm not.
As much as I hate the Skins, they are much worse a team than dallas is and the Eagles will crush them easily in both games this year. If any team has any chance of beating the Eagles, its the Cowboys. I want them to lose as much as possible because of that.
They are like the best of the shtein in our division.
In a game like this, it's easiest to root for injuries.
Quote from: FFatPatt on September 19, 2005, 02:03:53 PM
In a game like this, it's easiest to root for injuries.
Or for the stadium to blow up.
But then someone would win the Ghoulpool. lol
Quote from: General_Failure on September 19, 2005, 02:00:35 PM
I can't believe you're not rooting for a terrorist attack tonight.
That's exactly what I'm rooting for. All friendly countries to calibrate their nukes by launching all missiles at the 50-yard line.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 19, 2005, 02:01:23 PM
As much as I hate the Skins, they are much worse a team than dallas is and the Eagles will crush them easily in both games this year. If any team has any chance of beating the Eagles, its the Cowboys. I want them to lose as much as possible because of that.
They are like the best of the shtein in our division.
Agree 100%. If choosing to root, I'll root for the Skins because while they have no hope of competing, the Cowboys have some hope of competing and a 2-0 Skins team will still end up going 6-10 while a 2-0 Cowboys team could go 9-7 or 10-6.
I'm rooting for the taterskins as well, but not because of the aformentioned logic (I'm still a little suprised to see a woman use it - good job, PG).
The taterskins must score as many points as possible to allow another victory in a FFL.
Gotta root for Dallas :-X
1) Art, the Chief Gibbs Ball Sucker, is at the game as a member of the media courtsey of taterskins.com. He cannot have a fun trip, besides the late night visits to Gibbs' room.
2) The taterskins haven't beaten the Cowboys in 5 years or something like that. It's too funny not to continue.
3) Neither team is even close to as good as the Eagles. Whats the difference if Dallas starts 2-0 or Washington starts 2-0? None. The both still suck.
Arthur F. Taintlicker's diary:
QuoteOk, so, this may be the only entry in this thing. Maybe there'll be more. Depends on how I feel and the access we have. Here's my "Going to Dallas" Diary so far .
-- Friday, Sept. 16, 5 p.m.: Team upgraded our hotel to the very one the team will stay in. Eric and I will keep sentinel in the lobby reporting any curfew violations. . Will work to see if we can slip on to the team bus for the trip to the stadium. Dream big, you know .
-- Saturday, Sept. 17, 3 p.m.: Wearing taterskins gear at a running store my wife made me go to for a baby jogger, the girl behind the counter said, "Hey, you're a taterskin fan. My mom's in Maryland and never misses a game." Almost before she could finish, I blurted out, "I'm going to the game. With the team." I felt like I was about five .
-- Saturday, Sept. 17, 4 p.m.: Arriving home, I did something I never do. I went with my wife to the mailbox where I was exposed to neighbors I would have to talk to. I did this so I could say, "I'm going to the game on Monday." Now getting to about 4 years of age I think.
-- Saturday, Sept. 17, 5:30 p.m.: Called best friend to taunt him about the fact I was going to the game. He screens calls and knew better than to pick up .
-- Saturday, Sept. 17, 9 p.m.: Best friend called back thinking I'd calmed down some. Discovering I hadn't, he said, "Your article was too long." If he was on the internet he'd be the biggest jerk on the internet . Talked about Bears game and he promised to look for me on the sidelines on Monday.
-- Saturday, Sept. 17, 11 p.m.: Printed out boarding pass, directions from airport to team hotel, directions from hotel to stadium, tucked them in carry on bag with picture of my baby girl and my dad.
-- Sunday, Sept. 18, 8 a.m.: "What are you going to wear?" asks dutiful wife. Bless her. I don't know. I figure my full game-day regalia is a no-no in the press box. The Mills No. 50 taterskins jersey probably would be looked at a bit skeptically, you know, by all those pros I'll be with in the press room. So, I check weather.com figuring hot here in September is around 80 for a high. Texas around 85 or so I figure. Uh, nope. High today of 100. High tomorrow of 99. Minnesotans don't have clothes suited for that weather. Heat explains blithering Cowboy fans here as it must take a lot out of a guy.
-- Sunday, Sept. 18, 11:45 a.m.: In the car. Heading to the airport. Baby Brynn asleep. Wife needs food, adding to stress level. WOMEN.
-- Sunday, Sept. 18, 1:00 p.m.: Meet Eric in MSP airport as he connected through. Hit the plane. Life is good. On the way to Dallas.
-- Sunday, Sept. 18, 4:02 p.m.: Hit the gate in Dallas. HOLY HELL, it's hot. I hate this place and the Cowboys even more for making me come to this hellish pit.
-- Sunday, Sept. 18, 4:45 p.m.: In line for rental car. See a dozen or so Skins fans wandering about. Good showing up guys. Call hotel to assure reservations are secure. They say, "Yes, Mr. Mills." So, I ask, "No, I mean, have the reservations been taken care of." They say, "Yes, sir, you're with the group." The group being the Washington taterskins. WICKED COOL!!!
-- Sunday, Sept, 18, 5:10 p.m.: Arrive in hotel lot. Blondie calls to see what's up. She's at the team hotel from last year. Poor thing.
-- Sunday, Sept. 18, 5:18 p.m.: Check in. Treated like royalty. We're with the group you know. Discover I'm woefully under dressed for occasion. Head to room to change.
-- Sunday, Sept. 18, 6:00 p.m.: Eric and I enter hotel lobby, greeted by lovely site of entire team chilling out. I'd changed, but, now I would have fit right in for dress. Players looking pretty loose, milling around readying for dinner and meetings.
-- Sunday, Sept. 18, 6:02 p.m.: Eric and I decide to stand in the group looking like we belong. See first "honey" only available professional athletes. Must go lift or something. NICE.
-- Sunday, Sept. 18, 6:10 p.m.: Meet up with PR to get passes for game. Looking for anyone we might otherwise know so they might confirm we belong .
-- Sunday, Sept. 18, 6:18 p.m.: Enter sports bar for first drink. Start seeing scores. See our first "friend" as Karl Swanson was looking for a place to park and smoke cigars. He joins us with one Sonny Jurgenson. How cool is that. We sat with Sonny smoking cigars and chatting about football.
-- Sunday, Sept. 18, 6:25 p.m.: Meet Mike Dillow who introduces himself as, "You know, Mr. Port-a-Potty." Good work Mike.
-- Sunday, Sept. 18, 6:35 p.m.: Joined at our table by Larry Michael drinking something suspiciously like water. Must get this corrected.
-- Sunday, Sept. 18, 6:45 p.m.: Joined at our table by one Sam Huff. Eric and I just coolin' with Sonny, Larry, Sam, Karl and other team officials. The trip is already worth it.
-- Sunday, Sept. 18, 8 p.m.: Eat dinner watching game. Norv is Norv through and through.
-- Sunday, Sept. 18, 9 p.m.: Call Blondie to tell her we're booked up. She laments not being there to get Sonny to sign a card she had.
-- Sunday, Sept. 18, 10 p.m.: Sam heads to bed.
-- Sunday, Sept. 18, 10:20 p.m.: Sonny heads up for the night.
-- Sunday, Sept. 18, 10:45 p.m.: Great evening ends. Lots of choice comment you'll never get to hear. Sorry suckers .
-- Monday, Sept. 19, 5:45 a.m.: I wake up feeling strange. The room is dark. I'm comfortable. Trying to place it, I finally do. I woke up because I had to pee. I.E. NOT because my baby screamed on the monitor.
-- Monday, Sept. 19, 8 a.m.: Eric calls, ruining what was another three or four hours of sleep to come. Apparently front desk didn't take me seriously when I asked them to call me at 7:30 and cry like a child. Will have to address that. I mean, at $400 a night, you'd think they'd bark like a dog, wouldn't you?
-- Monday, Sept. 19, 8:45 a.m.: Finishing breakfast, I discover the hoops game has been moved up. Walking out of the area, I spot Sam Huff chatting up an inconspicuous defensive coordinator named Gregg Williams. I could smell his after shave and I didn't even lick his face, though I should have .
-- Monday, Sept. 19, 9:15 a.m.: Trying to find the basketball court in this sprawling complex. Once again forced to endure Texas heat walking outside. This place sucks. Anyway, I look lost and this LOVELY blonde approaches me asking if I need some help. I told her I needed to find the gym. She started to lead me, showing heightened interest in my every word. It dawned on me, "She's flirting with me." We continued to walk when I figured out why. "So, maybe I could go to the game tonight and we could hang out after." Yes. MY FIRST FOOTBALL GROUPIE. In full taterskin garb, she thought I was a player. I said, "Uh, um, well, why are you asking me." Blonde, foolish, she says, "You play right?" Here, a smart, unmarried man with no seven-month old baby at home says, "Yes. My name is, uh, Casey Rabach." This honest, married man with a baby at home says, "Nope. I'm just a fan the team let's hang out like a groupie. You know how that is." She didn't say, "Quite," but she did say, "The gym's right down there," and left me alone thinking about what could have been. Told wife this story and informed her rather vigorous rewards are required at the homestead on Tuesday.
-- Monday, Sept. 19, 3 p.m. -- Head outside and see Monday Night Football trucks and one Sonny Jurgenson sitting outside relaxing, smoking a cigar. Talked about our picks and helped him make his for next week. He's come to rely upon my football knowledge, what can I say .
Heading to the stadium soon. Updates will be after the game.
Psycho.
What a nut. They're just a football team. A really, really mediocre football team.
He disgusts me to the highest degree.
That he is there as taterskins.com media is just so fitting, I could cry.
cant wait till they put Jason Campbell in and find out what a waste of a pick he was.
Gibbs doesn't draft busts. He just had that great eye for talent.
Joe will draft another QB and 4 h-backs next year. Obviously he won't have a 1st or 4th round pick because Denver has 'em because of that stupid trade King Joe made.
I hope Dallas wins tonight 3-0
Quote from: MDS on September 19, 2005, 05:51:10 PM
Gibbs doesn't draft busts. He just had that great eye for talent.
The only time his draft picks don't work out is when they refuse to buy into his system. It's not Joe's fault.
Nice Gatorade bath in week 2, Skins.
Reid didn't get a bath after the Birds finally beat the Jints after losing 9 straight. He didn't get a bath until the last NFCCG.
Like I said....worst 2-0 team EVER.
Washington's defensive line is horrible as well. Flat out horrible.
Gregg Williams is a genious. Flat out brilliant.
I cant get on extremeskins, but when i did, they were doing the fire gibbs/start campbell threads. now its back to gibbs is god, praise his holy shrine. what a bunch of losers. i cant wait till we play them and kick their ass.
I wondered if they were calling for Gibbs' head and for Brutalnell to be benched. :-D
23 points scored in two games.
On pace for a robust 184 for the season.
The 1998 Eagles scored 161
Stop doubting Saint Gibbs. He beat Dallas!
That was a pathetic collapse we had in the 4th. I I can't for the life of me understand why we had the guy we signed to play the slot playing LCB. I had a feeling that missed FG to open the game would come back to bite us on the ass as well, and it did. We gave it to them, and they took it happily. After that Glenn TD on our first 2nd half possession we had them on the ropes and we never threw the knockout punch.
Point and laugh at the Cowboys tonight, we earned it.
Ok, if you insist. --------------> :-D
By the way, man. When will Tuna/Zimmer realize they need a real FS so your SS, Mr. Horsecollar doesn't have to be exposed in coverage anymore? Not that I'm complaining or anything..because I sure do enjoy watching Roy get burnt over the top.
I don't know why Newman was in the slot for you guys, but Jim Johnson often does that too in his nickle packages. He brings in Rod Hood (nickle CB) and lines him up outside and Sheldon Brown slides to the inside because the slot is tougher to defend.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on September 20, 2005, 02:59:40 AM
Ok, if you insist. --------------> :-D
By the way, man. When will Tuna/Zimmer realize they need a real FS so your SS, Mr. Horsecollar doesn't have to be exposed in coverage anymore? Not that I'm complaining or anything..because I sure do enjoy watching Roy get burnt over the top.
I don't know why Newman was in the slot for you guys, but Jim Johnson often does that too in his nickle packages. He brings in Rod Hood (nickle CB) and lines him up outside and Sheldon Brown slides to the inside because the slot is tougher to defend.
:) I don't know about the FS/SS bit. I was surprised that he was back in coverage to begin with, so I guess that just goes to show he doesn't have all that much confidence in Davis' abilities back there. On that first Moss TD, someone on a DC board said they saw RW's arm get hit, but I didn't notice it. No one's pretending his strength is in coverage, but there he was. It looks as though it's going to be the same for us at FS this year as it was for us at RCB last year. We had so many holes last year, there was no way we fix them all. I think we were looking to go FS in the 2nd round last year but Bullocks and Poole were both gone by the time we picked and I think that's who we had targeted.
I understand about rolling your guy from the outside into the slot, but one of the reasons Glenn was brought in was to play the slot. The fact that it happened two times in a row is what gets me. Glenn went for the ball on the first one, too. He committed to the ball, and once it was caught it was over.
(http://www.oliverwillis.com/wp-content/moss_skins_win2.jpg)
He must have had visions of last weeks game ending INT, but a deflection would have worked just fine for me. Oh well.
I'll just say that if the taterskins think Moss is gonna put up 159 every week they are going to be extremely disappointed. He's not even better than Coles. He had one good game against a paper thin secondary.
Oh and my friend sent me this pic. No idea where he found it. It's the funniest thing I've ever seen.
(http://img388.imageshack.us/img388/7712/brunell6ld1iz.jpg)
Quote from: Avenger on September 20, 2005, 03:38:00 AM
I'll just say that if the taterskins think Moss is gonna put up 159 every week they are going to be extremely disappointed. He's not even better than Coles. He had one good game against a paper thin secondary.
Nope, that's not going to happen every day. I'll add that while we aren't paper thin, but we sure as heck were well toasted in the last 5 minutes and that's when it really counts.
Quote from: EJ72 on September 20, 2005, 03:43:30 AM
Nope, that's not going to happen every day. I'll add that while we aren't paper thin, but we sure as heck were well toasted in the last 5 minutes and that's when it really counts.
It only counted becuase your OC went into a shell and had the team settle for a figgie instead of driving the nail into the coffin. That or having 2 yard routes on 4th and 4. And what was with that 2 minute pass play? Why were they rushing to get a play off instead of milking the clock. That whole 4th quarter was one monumental collapse since they could have put the game away so many times.
That was the best thing to read this morning.
Knowing that the Skins had 3 minutes of play in the whole game...and that Dallas sucked enough to blow it at home on MNF.
Best possible ending I could have ever asked for. (In a realistic fashion)
EDITED
I would've spend for the stadium collapsing, but thats just me.
2 TD's in 8 quarters. The Skins are so awesome.
Two freak touchdowns and everyone is back on the bandwagon. Lovely.
QuoteI've said from the beginning of preseason, if our offense plays like they did in those 2 minutes last night, we go to the playoffs. We already have a playoff defense. When our offense steps up to the plate, we're going to be hard to beat.
QuoteI say we start talking Superbowl and destiny.
And Art, the taterskins/
Coach Gibbs/
Mr. Snyder kiss-ass ball tickler chimes in:
QuoteI have more proof for you.
Eric and I were on the field. I got a huge hug from Renaldo Wynn and thanked him. I thanked Daniels. We were in the hallway near the locker room. Snyder came SPRINTING DOWN the hall. The look on his face and in his eyes was the PRECISE same look I had. Eric had.
It was a look of blissful happiness mixed with the need to cry. He's a fan. That I know more than anything.
Ahh....winning the superbo- i mean, a week 2 game against dallas is awsome.
Week 2. Gatorade shower. Pathetic.
The Skins had their big win of the year last night...as Atlanta did Week 1. The Eagles are waiting until their game scheduled for Feb 5th in Detriot...
You guys don't like to give credit to anybody but yourselves, do you?
Quote from: Avenger on September 20, 2005, 03:41:30 AM
Oh and my friend sent me this pic. No idea where he found it. It's the funniest thing I've ever seen.
(http://img388.imageshack.us/img388/7712/brunell6ld1iz.jpg)
:puke
Quote from: Jake on September 20, 2005, 12:13:56 PM
You guys don't like to give credit to anybody but yourselves, do you?
Did the taterskins beat the Dallas Cowboys on MNF 14-13, scoing 2 TDs in the final 3.5 minutes? Yes.
Did the taterskins win a game against an NFC opponent? Yes.
Did the taterskins win a game,
in week 2, that should have caused a gatorade bath and excessive celebration? No.
The point of view is that they just won a week 2 game - much like Tennesse, Chicago, Tampa - all on a list of 16 teams that one this weekend. That type of celebration is for making the playoffs, winning the division, winning a trip to the SB, or winning it all. That is NOT the type of celebration that should be after a week 2 improbable win. An emotional win, yes - but not a "celebrate like you've on the bowl" situation.
Quote from: Jake on September 20, 2005, 12:13:56 PM
You guys don't like to give credit to anybody but yourselves, do you?
yes, but not in the '2005 Point & Laugh At The taterskins Thread'.
if it helps you sleep better, nice win, good 4 minutes of football you put up, enjoy the bye week, then back to reality.
Quote from: Jake on September 20, 2005, 12:13:56 PM
You guys don't like to give credit to anybody but yourselves, do you?
Jake,
The fact remains, that for the majority of the game, you guys were handled. Just about any other team would have closed it out with a field goal or touchdown. Brunell looked like shtein for 9/10s of the game, as did the rest of the offense. On two plays, Moss beat out an overrated safety in coverage. I'll give your coaching staff credit for exploiting that match up. But to think the Skins played great on
ANY level last night is a joke. And Brunell is still on the downward spiral. Don't kid yourself.
I just love the fact that their comeback means Mark Brutal will be their QB for the rest of the season. No way God-fearing Gibbs benches his noodle-armed apostle now. :-D
I know we sucked for most of the game. I was pissed.
But no one, except for maybe Mikey, seems to want to give any credit where credit is due. We won a game and di so in comeback fashion.
Of course I would have preffered us the play like this during all 4 quarters and not win in heart attack fashion but a win is a win.
And for now, we are leading the NFC East with an undefeated record. I am going to enjoy it as long as it lasts.
The Eagles aren't God's gift to earth and most of you act like it. You all think the Eagles are the best team in existance and everything is shtein. The Eagles got their butts handed to them on week 1 against an average defense and beat the worst team in the league badly in week 2. Not much to say for you guys, either.
We will see as the season goes on.
Jake, what do you think the score of a 49ers/taterskins game would be?
42-3? I don't think so.
Quote from: Jake on September 20, 2005, 01:25:56 PM
I know we sucked for most of the game. I was pissed.
But no one, except for maybe Mikey, seems to want to give any credit where credit is due. We won a game and di so in comeback fashion.
Of course I would have preffered us the play like this during all 4 quarters and not win in heart attack fashion but a win is a win.
And for now, we are leading the NFC East with an undefeated record. I am going to enjoy it as long as it lasts.
The Eagles aren't God's gift to earth and most of you act like it. You all think the Eagles are the best team in existance and everything is shtein. The Eagles got their butts handed to them on week 1 against an average defense and beat the worst team in the league badly in week 2. Not much to say for you guys, either.
We will see as the season goes on.
Uhh....dude, did you actually watch the game? We lost, but did not get our asses handed to us. The Eagles are still the class of the NFC, and will be until someone proves otherwise. One game you guys won, "in come back fashion", okay. You'll still be on the south-side of .500, and you'd be foolish to think otherwise. Yay! You won. You guys are now the favorites to win the East. :boo
Quote from: Jake on September 20, 2005, 01:25:56 PM
The Eagles got their butts handed to them on week 1
Sounds like someone has their lips planted nicely on Art's crack.
Quote from: Jake on September 20, 2005, 01:25:56 PM
The Eagles aren't God's gift to earth and most of you act like it. You all think the Eagles are the best team in existance and everything is shtein. The Eagles got their butts handed to them on week 1 against an average defense and beat the worst team in the league badly in week 2. Not much to say for you guys, either.
Week 1 was as boring and uninspired as ... well, the Skins performance against Dallas. The Eagles defense was without it's run-stopping retard and still held the Falcons to 14 points. The Skins defense held a mediocre team to 13 points. You're comparing what will most likely our worst game of the year and your best.
But hey, Gibbs beat Dallas and all is well. He's super.
We should all bring Gatorade to the Eagles/Skins games this year and dump them on each other when we demolish the Skins. (And by 'each other' I meant GF.)
Spot me a ticket and I'll sacrifice my black Andrews jersey to the Gatorade gods.
Between my ticket, your ticket, my beer, your beer (which I'll drink) and the 17 bottles of Gatorade I'm going to dump on you, this trip is getting pricey.
Yeah, but think of how great it will be to see the one taterskins fan that actually attends the game look even more pathetic after a loss.
Quote from: General_Failure on September 20, 2005, 01:53:50 PM
Yeah, but think of how great it will be to see the one taterskins fan that actually attends the game look even more pathetic after a loss.
......and then killing him brutally..... :evil
Quote from: General_Failure on September 20, 2005, 01:53:50 PM
Yeah, but think of how great it will be to see the one taterskins fan that actually attends the game look even more pathetic after a loss.
Are you saying that taterskins fans can actually look MORE pathetic? Egads.
hey, can i dump a gatorade on one of you fools? i'll bring my own if that makes a difference.
I've discovered that there's always one more notch on the misery belt.
Go right ahead. I for one will be too drunk/focused on drenching GF to notice.
Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC on September 20, 2005, 01:30:16 PM
Quote from: Jake on September 20, 2005, 01:25:56 PM
I know we sucked for most of the game. I was pissed.
But no one, except for maybe Mikey, seems to want to give any credit where credit is due. We won a game and di so in comeback fashion.
Of course I would have preffered us the play like this during all 4 quarters and not win in heart attack fashion but a win is a win.
And for now, we are leading the NFC East with an undefeated record. I am going to enjoy it as long as it lasts.
The Eagles aren't God's gift to earth and most of you act like it. You all think the Eagles are the best team in existance and everything is shtein. The Eagles got their butts handed to them on week 1 against an average defense and beat the worst team in the league badly in week 2. Not much to say for you guys, either.
We will see as the season goes on.
Uhh....dude, did you actually watch the game? We lost, but did not get our asses handed to us. The Eagles are still the class of the NFC, and will be until someone proves otherwise. One game you guys won, "in come back fashion", okay. You'll still be on the south-side of .500, and you'd be foolish to think otherwise. Yay! You won. You guys are now the favorites to win the East. :boo
Yes, I did watch the game and when Atlanta's defense was on the field, you guys couldn't do squat. McNabb was making stupid mistakes and was getting crushed because your line couldn't stop ATL's D.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 20, 2005, 01:33:31 PM
Quote from: Jake on September 20, 2005, 01:25:56 PM
The Eagles got their butts handed to them on week 1
Sounds like someone has their lips planted nicely on Art's crack.
I rarely ever post at Extreme. I'm a member of TheHogs.net, your F2FA rival site.
I roam the boards often but don't really care about most of their opinions. I'm just there to see if any news breaks because there are over 35,000 members and one of them is bound to post a new news story.
Again, THN is my home and I don't care about Extreme.
By the way, I don't know why you guys have such an obsession for Art. I know you guys don't like his opinions but many share his beliefs and you guys still continue to single him out. I'm not defending him, just want to know what beef you all have with him.
He's the posterboy for Skinsfan's insanity.
Quote from: Jake on September 20, 2005, 03:04:14 PM
By the way, I don't know why you guys have such an obsession for Art. I know you guys don't like his opinions but many share his beliefs and you guys still continue to single him out. I'm not defending him, just want to know what beef you all have with him.
He is the most visible/audible example of the typical idiotic/delusional taterskins fan who gets their hopes up every offseason, then continues to get them up through the first 2 games and then, even as the team is failing failing failing, sees nothing but blue skies and bunny rabbits. His ability to scream about how great the taterskins organization is above the obvious din of failure is amazing in a very depressing and infuriating way.
Not to mention he acts like a little Nancy girl.... he posts his drivel and the clueless sheep come of the woodwork to hop on his sack ... then as soon as somebody calls him on his b.s. and posts a solid, logical rebuttal, *poof* ... no more Art. He runs away and hopes the thread sinks to page 4 or 5.
He's a tool.
Yes, also that.
Hey Jake. You asked a question, we gave an answer. Slink away much?
I don't give anyone credit but the Eagles, I'll admit that. Occasionally I will, but hardly ever. Enemies get no credit from me, I'm sorry. My hatred is too strong.
Can you guys please start laughing at the Skins again? They still suck donkey balls.
Type in "stupid taterskins" and notice what the 3rd picture is.
Quote from: Jake on September 20, 2005, 01:25:56 PM
I know we sucked for most of the game. I was pissed.
But no one, except for maybe Mikey, seems to want to give any credit where credit is due. We won a game and di so in comeback fashion.
Of course I would have preffered us the play like this during all 4 quarters and not win in heart attack fashion but a win is a win.
And for now, we are leading the NFC East with an undefeated record. I am going to enjoy it as long as it lasts.
The Eagles aren't God's gift to earth and most of you act like it. You all think the Eagles are the best team in existance and everything is shtein. The Eagles got their butts handed to them on week 1 against an average defense and beat the worst team in the league badly in week 2. Not much to say for you guys, either.
We will see as the season goes on.
Granted their defense isn't as good as the Eagles or taterskins, but it is much above average. Which team had the most sacks last season?
Jake,
You should be thanking your lucky stars that Roy Williams is as good at covering a deep ball as any fan picked out of the stadium would be.
How in the farg does a safety who just saw the exact same thing allow him to be split by Moss on that route?
Moss split the gap between Glenn & Williams and took off. The coverage is terrible. And even worse considering he got beat on the same damn route by the same damn player about 2:00 prior?
You want credit? You aren't getting it from me because Dallas lost that game...Washington didn't win it.
Just like the Eagles lost to ATL, ATL didn't beat them. 2 missed FG's and no points given up after the 1st quarter and numerous dumb mistakes by Donny Mac.
You won because of Dallas' stupidity. Congrats.
Quote from: MDS on September 20, 2005, 08:06:46 AM
Two freak touchdowns and everyone is back on the bandwagon. Lovely.
QuoteI've said from the beginning of preseason, if our offense plays like they did in those 2 minutes last night, we go to the playoffs. We already have a playoff defense. When our offense steps up to the plate, we're going to be hard to beat.
QuoteI say we start talking Superbowl and destiny.
And Art, the taterskins/Coach Gibbs/Mr. Snyder kiss-ass ball tickler chimes in:
QuoteI have more proof for you.
Eric and I were on the field. I got a huge hug from Renaldo Wynn and thanked him. I thanked Daniels. We were in the hallway near the locker room. Snyder came SPRINTING DOWN the hall. The look on his face and in his eyes was the PRECISE same look I had. Eric had.
It was a look of blissful happiness mixed with the need to cry. He's a fan. That I know more than anything.
Ahh....winning the superbo- i mean, a week 2 game against dallas is awsome.
:-D :-D
Why would Renaldo Wynn hug him?
I wonder if Art tried to go into the locker room to watch them shower?
QuoteWe have an incredible D. If we had a pass rusher DE I say we could be the 85 Bears.
QuoteBy far for me the most important thing this team showed last night???.....Never say die. They will play hard all day long until the final whistle. Guys that is the making of a championship team. This victory is also going to get it in their heads that they can beat anyone at anytime. I see them going places this year
Delusional.
They have a BYE this week and will promptly lose their next 3 (SEA, DEN, KC)
ExtremeSkins is more fun like this, admit it.
I can't wait until the wheels fall off. They won those 2 games ugly.
Hell, they could win 9-10 games this year now, sure. Then watch as they get absolutely destroyed on the road in the playoffs. That is absolutely their best-case scenario.
Quote from: Jake on September 20, 2005, 12:13:56 PM
You guys don't like to give credit to anybody but yourselves, do you?
I give credit for the two "heave and a prayer" touchdowns mainly because I'm surprised Brunell had the strength to not underthrow the ball - for a change - but the phantom holding call that negated a first down is what really lost the Cowboys that game. (Well that and their own ineptitude...)
The Skins got what boils down to a miracle win against a team they normally can't beat after getting their asses handed to them for 57 minutes. How much "credit" would you give to the Eagles in that situation?
A few years back when Brian Westbrook stole a game from the Giants with that punt return most Eagles fans admitted that the Eagles stole a game that they deserved to lose based on the way they played. I didn't see many rival fans giving the Eagles credit for their miraculous TD. They just whined about a lucky win. So, you get the same. :P
Quote from: rjs246 on September 20, 2005, 11:45:10 AM
Week 2. Gatorade shower. Pathetic.
Well, when you suck ass as bad as the Skins do, you have to take it when you can get it, 'cause it might not come 'round very soon again.
Also, wasn't that the first time they beat the Cowboys in the last 14 games, or sumthin'?
Actually no, Spurrier beat them once in Dallas also. That's why I don't see what the big deal is. It's not like Dallas had a streak of 14 straight wins going into yesterday. Dallas won the last 3 or 4, then the Spurrier loss, and then a bunch before that. That's why I hate when the talking heads use numbers like 14 of the last 15 or whatever. It makes it sound like the Skins haven't beaten the Cowboys in a decade.
Quote from: General_Failure on September 20, 2005, 01:34:27 PM
Quote from: Jake on September 20, 2005, 01:25:56 PM
The Eagles aren't God's gift to earth and most of you act like it. You all think the Eagles are the best team in existance and everything is shtein. The Eagles got their butts handed to them on week 1 against an average defense and beat the worst team in the league badly in week 2. Not much to say for you guys, either.
Week 1 was as boring and uninspired as ... well, the Skins performance against Dallas. The Eagles defense was without it's run-stopping retard and still held the Falcons to 14 points. The Skins defense held a mediocre team to 13 points. You're comparing what will most likely our worst game of the year and your best.
But hey, Gibbs beat Dallas and all is well. He's super.
Are you actually giving 'The Woodchoppa' some credit?!?!? I don't believe my eyes! I'm going to get my .45, 'cause I've seen it all now! :-D
Quote from: TexasEagle on September 20, 2005, 08:03:05 PM
Actually no, Spurrier beat them once in Dallas also. That's why I don't see what the big deal is. It's not like Dallas had a streak of 14 straight wins going into yesterday. Dallas won the last 3 or 4, then the Spurrier loss, and then a bunch before that. That's why I hate when the talking heads use numbers like 14 of the last 15 or whatever. It makes it sound like the Skins haven't beaten the Cowboys in a decade.
Thanks, I kinda' caught the ass end of that on ESPN, and didn't get all the info.
Actually I was referring to Simon. ;)
Quote from: rjs246 on September 20, 2005, 03:35:51 PM
Hey Jake. You asked a question, we gave an answer. Slink away much?
If by slink away, you mean post and disappear, then no.
I had to go to work.
As the record stood before Monday, the taterskins had only beaten Dallas once in the last 14 meetings. The last time being at FedEx Field in 2002 during the season finale. It was Darrell Green's last game as a Skin and Emmitt Smith's last as a Cowboy.
This game meant a lot to Skins fans everywhere. Hopefully it means a more meaningful, competitive rivalry instead of the one-sided outcome we've become used to.
QuoteAs the record stood before Monday, the taterskins had only beaten Dallas once in the last 14 meetings. The last time being at FedEx Field in 2002 during the season finale. It was Darrell Green's last game as a Skin and Emmitt Smith's last as a Cowboy.
Just to add to it, it was also their first win at TX Stadium since '95 or so. Maybe that's why they celebrated the way they did?
maybe, but still, it's only week 2
GATORADE BATH IN WEEK TWO!
There is no excuse for that. Period.
Quote from: FFatPatt on September 20, 2005, 07:25:47 PM
I can't wait until the wheels fall off. They won those 2 games ugly.
Hell, they could win 9-10 games this year now, sure. Then watch as they get absolutely destroyed on the road in the playoffs. That is absolutely their best-case scenario.
Isn't that what the Eagles do every year!?!? ::) Oh, I'm sorry, sometimes you get absolutely destroyed at home in the playoffs!
:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
You guys are just the best team I have ever seen. Every year you do so well until you lose in the playoffs.
A comparable example would be the win over the Giants in 2001. We'd lost, what, 8 in a row? I jumped like a lunatic when Thrash caught that TD in the back of the endzone. But I don't remember Reid getting a Gatorade bath for it.
Quote from: twatson on September 21, 2005, 09:05:34 AM
Quote from: FFatPatt on September 20, 2005, 07:25:47 PM
I can't wait until the wheels fall off. They won those 2 games ugly.
Hell, they could win 9-10 games this year now, sure. Then watch as they get absolutely destroyed on the road in the playoffs. That is absolutely their best-case scenario.
Isn't that what the Eagles do every year!?!? ::) Oh, I'm sorry, sometimes you get absolutely destroyed at home in the playoffs!
:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
You guys are just the best team I have ever seen. Every year you do so well until you lose in the playoffs.
1999...your last sniff at the playoffs since 1992 before the salary cap era.
Elementary my dear, twatson.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on September 21, 2005, 09:21:51 AM
Quote from: twatson on September 21, 2005, 09:05:34 AM
Quote from: FFatPatt on September 20, 2005, 07:25:47 PM
I can't wait until the wheels fall off. They won those 2 games ugly.
Hell, they could win 9-10 games this year now, sure. Then watch as they get absolutely destroyed on the road in the playoffs. That is absolutely their best-case scenario.
Isn't that what the Eagles do every year!?!? ::) Oh, I'm sorry, sometimes you get absolutely destroyed at home in the playoffs!
:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
You guys are just the best team I have ever seen. Every year you do so well until you lose in the playoffs.
1999...your last sniff at the playoffs since 1992 before the salary cap era.
Elementary my dear, twatson.
Well, isn't it just as obvious that you guys perennially lose in the playoffs as it is that we don't make it there? That's all I'm saying.
For the last eight years or so you guys have been a much better team than we have, I agree, I just thought that the quote about us making the playoffs and losing was a bit ironic.
I still have you guys going to the SB from the NFC and winning the East, you have a very good team and I hope Westbrook kicks ass on my fantasy team. I still hope we win but I'm trying to keep things in perspective, we still have a long way to go but 2-0 is a good start. I just hope that you guys keep some perspective as well and realize that impressive as your team has been lately you still have to win something before you can really talk.
1960 NFL Champions, baby. ;)
Quote from: Zanshin on September 21, 2005, 09:44:04 AM
1960 NFL Champions, baby. ;)
Hehe, and you say we're hanging on to the past! ;)
Quote from: EJ72 on September 21, 2005, 02:33:49 AM
QuoteAs the record stood before Monday, the taterskins had only beaten Dallas once in the last 14 meetings. The last time being at FedEx Field in 2002 during the season finale. It was Darrell Green's last game as a Skin and Emmitt Smith's last as a Cowboy.
Just to add to it, it was also their first win at TX Stadium since '95 or so. Maybe that's why they celebrated the way they did?
Yeah, Heath Shuler was our starting quarterback... and a rookie. :o
That win meant a lot for the team, too.
I think the Gatorade bath was cool. Portis and Rock Cartwright were the culprits. It shows we have energy and they do care about Gibbs and what he is trying to get this team to achieve.
Quote from: Jake on September 21, 2005, 10:55:58 AM
I think the Gatorade bath was cool. Portis and Rock Cartwright were the culprits. It shows we have energy and they do care about Gibbs and what he is trying to get this team to achieve.
Of course you do. You're an idiot. It was the second week of the season. Any team/coach/player that can't act like a professional after winning one game early in the season is a farging pathetic joke. But hey. Way to win in week 2. Good job.
Quote from: rjs246 on September 21, 2005, 11:04:49 AM
Quote from: Jake on September 21, 2005, 10:55:58 AM
I think the Gatorade bath was cool. Portis and Rock Cartwright were the culprits. It shows we have energy and they do care about Gibbs and what he is trying to get this team to achieve.
Of course you do. You're an idiot. It was the second week of the season. Any team/coach/player that can't act like a professional after winning one game early in the season is a farging pathetic joke. But hey. Way to win in week 2. Good job.
This victory meant something to the team, no matter what week it was.
If Reid got a Gatorade bath, you'd be creaming yourself right about now.
You are so sad. You provide no football intelligence, so you cover it up with insults. You've got major issues.
It's not my fault you've got thin skin. I'm not sure if you've noticed but everyone here gets their balls broken. You seem to be one of the only ones crying about it, though.
Do you remember the 2000-2001 season opener when the Eagles, after years of being a laughing stock, trounced the Cowboys and announced to the world that they were a team to be dealt with? We had spent the majority of the past decade as one of the worst teams in the league and had just beaten a perrenial powerhouse and hated rival. Was our team stupid and unprofessional enough to think that one game at the beginning of the season meant anything? Did they jump around like a bunch of monkeys and hug each other like they just won the Lombardi? No. They won. They shook hands. They left the field. It's called professionalism. Class. The taterskins, from Dan Snyder, to Joe Gibbs to the idiotic meatheads who dumped Gatorade on their coach are a joke, and it was all puton display for the world to see on Monday night. And while the fans are still soiling themselves over Joe Gibbs, the fact is that without Gregg Williams, Gibbs would be lucky to have notched a single win since his return.
You're team won a divisional game. I know that's big news for taterskins fans, but don't pretend like there is any excuse for this kind of exuberence. The whole world is laughing at you.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on September 21, 2005, 09:21:51 AM
Quote from: twatson on September 21, 2005, 09:05:34 AM
Quote from: FFatPatt on September 20, 2005, 07:25:47 PM
I can't wait until the wheels fall off. They won those 2 games ugly.
Hell, they could win 9-10 games this year now, sure. Then watch as they get absolutely destroyed on the road in the playoffs. That is absolutely their best-case scenario.
Isn't that what the Eagles do every year!?!? ::) Oh, I'm sorry, sometimes you get absolutely destroyed at home in the playoffs!
:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
You guys are just the best team I have ever seen. Every year you do so well until you lose in the playoffs.
1999...your last sniff at the playoffs since 1992 before the salary cap era.
Elementary my dear, twat
fixed
Quote from: rjs246 on September 21, 2005, 12:48:02 PM
It's not my fault you've got thin skin. I'm not sure if you've noticed but everyone here gets their balls broken. You seem to be one of the only ones crying about it, though.
Do you remember the 2000-2001 season opener when the Eagles, after years of being a laughing stock, trounced the Cowboys and announced to the world that they were a team to be dealt with? We had spent the majority of the past decade as one of the worst teams in the league and had just beaten a perrenial powerhouse and hated rival. Was our team stupid and unprofessional enough to think that one game at the beginning of the season meant anything? Did they jump around like a bunch of monkeys and hug each other like they just won the Lombardi? No. They won. They shook hands. They left the field. It's called professionalism. Class. The taterskins, from Dan Snyder, to Joe Gibbs to the idiotic meatheads who dumped Gatorade on their coach are a joke, and it was all puton display for the world to see on Monday night. And while the fans are still soiling themselves over Joe Gibbs, the fact is that without Gregg Williams, Gibbs would be lucky to have notched a single win since his return.
You're team won a divisional game. I know that's big news for taterskins fans, but don't pretend like there is any excuse for this kind of exuberence. The whole world is laughing at you.
The point is I'm not ignorant enough to insult somebody when I can't make a point.
Oh, and how is a Gatorade shower classless when you've already won the game? It's a celebration for an achievement.
It's classless to do it before the game is even over, i.e. a college football game a couple of years back when a team leading late in the 4th gave their coach a Gatorade bath before the game ended and then the opposing team threw a long bomb and beat them in the final seconds.
As an Eagles fan, you fail to realize what this win means to the Skins and their fans.
A Gatorade shower is not that big of a deal. It happens. Whoopity doo.
Quote from: Jake on September 21, 2005, 01:00:12 PM
As an Eagles fan, you fail to realize what this win means to the Skins and their fans.
I lived in Arlington and Fairfax county for most of my life. Most of my friends and my ladyfriend are taterskins fans. I understand what this win meant to you. And it's pathetic.
Quote from: rjs246 on September 21, 2005, 01:05:55 PM
my ladyfriend are taterskins fans.
booo. you lose points in my book for this.
Quote from: T_Section224 on September 21, 2005, 01:20:42 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on September 21, 2005, 01:05:55 PM
my ladyfriend are taterskins fans.
booo. you lose points in my book for this.
Are you kidding me? I lose points in
MY book for this. Luckily she has been trained to never mention her team to me. She thought she was a football fan, until she met my college buddies (all of whom are Eagles fans) and I. She then made the over-obvious realization that she wasn't a fan, she just happened to grow up in DC and follow them casually. But yes, I lose points, and I don't have that many to give.
I bought four tickets for the taterskins/Bucs game in Tampa on Ticketmaster for the sole purpose of scalping delusional taterskins idiots who'd be laboring under the delusion that their team has a chance this year.
Looks like I found a few here in this thread.
The first $800 for the four takes 'em all.
:yay
well, at least you've got her in her place when it comes to her team. i'm sure you could convince her to be an eagles fan, just buy her one of those pink mcnabb jerseys, she'll wear it and not even realize she's supporting the team.
Quote from: twatson on September 21, 2005, 09:05:34 AM
Quote from: FFatPatt on September 20, 2005, 07:25:47 PM
I can't wait until the wheels fall off. They won those 2 games ugly.
Hell, they could win 9-10 games this year now, sure. Then watch as they get absolutely destroyed on the road in the playoffs. That is absolutely their best-case scenario.
Isn't that what the Eagles do every year!?!? ::) Oh, I'm sorry, sometimes you get absolutely destroyed at home in the playoffs!
:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
You guys are just the best team I have ever seen. Every year you do so well until you lose in the playoffs.
A talking twat?
The internet farging ROCKS!!!!
I forgot to mention that they'd be destroyed on the road in the WILD-CARD round.
It was obvious to us Eagles fans what I meant, but I overestimated the intelligence of the Dead Tree Crew.
Quote from: Wingspan on September 21, 2005, 12:50:34 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on September 21, 2005, 09:21:51 AM
Quote from: twatson on September 21, 2005, 09:05:34 AM
Quote from: FFatPatt on September 20, 2005, 07:25:47 PM
I can't wait until the wheels fall off. They won those 2 games ugly.
Hell, they could win 9-10 games this year now, sure. Then watch as they get absolutely destroyed on the road in the playoffs. That is absolutely their best-case scenario.
Isn't that what the Eagles do every year!?!? ::) Oh, I'm sorry, sometimes you get absolutely destroyed at home in the playoffs!
:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
You guys are just the best team I have ever seen. Every year you do so well until you lose in the playoffs.
1999...your last sniff at the playoffs since 1992 before the salary cap era.
Elementary my dear, twat
fixed
Wow, how mature and clever, like I never heard that before.
I would agree that we are overly optomistic but to be fair I don't see what the problem is.
You guys fail to see that we have some reason for being that way. We won two Super Bowls when we were heavy underdogs. I mean Doug Williams was a backup and he produced the best performance by a QB in SB history. It was magical just like Riggo's run against Miami. Then we won another after going 14-2 but even then most people picked the Bills and after a disasterous preseason most people thought we were going nowhere.
Even though recently we've been crap, taterskins fans always have hope because they have seen their team produce miracles in the past. What's more, the reason we love Gibbs is because he was the guy who pulled this off for us.
I am very sorry that you guys are so bitter that you feel the need to always slam a team and their fans for displaying exhuberence. I realize the pain that you guys go through every year and I am sorry that you never let yourselves go and celebrate. I am sorry that your sports teams give you such emotional trauma that you have to be so critical and jaded about everything. It upsets us when we lose and when we have bad teams but we are not idiots for still believing in our teams, we are just loyal fans who always hope for the best. Maybe if you guys actually win it will get the chip of your shoulder and then you can relax a bit and not feel the need to always put down other people who are happy unlike yourselves.
Go ahead and say what you want because it will not dampen my enthusiasm. I know there are problems with our team but there are also many good things that can hopefully help us to win some games. We already won two. We were all very excited to win the game on MNF. It was against our rival (it used to be the biggest rivalry in sports) on Monday night, against Gibbs' arch nemesis, in Dallas and on the night they honored the triplets (I'm sure you can understand THAT). It was the best comeback ever against one of the greatest coaches ever and absolutely nobody picked us to win. What's more, it was payback for all the times Dallas pulled wins out of their asses at the end of the recent games we had played against them. The Gatorade shower was fine and as for being unproffessional I think that fighting with the other team BEFORE a game has even started is a lot worse. I am sorry that you guys always have to be so reserved because you think your team will ultimately fail and upset you, I for one am going to enjoy the Dallas game for the next two weeks.
And as for Gibbs, you can't comment on him after one season. He was 7-9 his first time around and Reid was 5-11 (but he hasn't won amy Super Bowls has he so maybe not a good comparison). And Gregg Williams is the Def. Coord. because Gibbs HANDPICKED him! He obviously knew what he was doing on that one. You guys are just so bitter why do you have to hate on everyone?
It's admirable the way you're able to stick up for your sorry-ass team.
How you can be a football fan and believe that Mark Brunell can quarterback a team into the playoffs is beyond me. Every single pass was a duck. He has no zip on the ball at all. And Portis is slightly above average at best.
You're a couple of injuries on defense away from not being remotely competitive. Gibbs could be a great coach (and he's not anymore), and that team still couldn't manage more than 10 wins and a first round playoff exit... and that's if everything goes perfectly. You're more likely looking at 7 or 8 max, so enjoy it while it lasts.
Quote from: FFatPatt on September 21, 2005, 03:21:38 PM
It's admirable the way you're able to stick up for your sorry-ass team.
How you can be a football fan and believe that Mark Brunell can quarterback a team into the playoffs is beyond me. Every single pass was a duck. He has no zip on the ball at all. And Portis is slightly above average at best.
You're a couple of injuries on defense away from not being remotely competitive. Gibbs could be a great coach (and he's not anymore), and that team still couldn't manage more than 10 wins and a first round playoff exit... and that's if everything goes perfectly. You're more likely looking at 7 or 8 max, so enjoy it while it lasts.
The 60 yd bombs didn't look like ducks to me.
Last year our entire defense was injured by week 3 and we were still very good.
All I'm looking for right now is the playoffs, that will be a marked improvement. If we go out in the first round at least that's better than the quagmire we've been in so far. I am going to enjoy it because anything more than that is icing on the cake. Is that so bad? I actually think that 'Skins fans are better off because right now our expectations are a lot lower than yours. With the quality of your team over the last few seasons I am amazed you guys haven't won yet.
Quote from: FFatPatt on September 21, 2005, 03:21:38 PM
It's admirable the way you're able to stick up for your sorry-ass team.
How you can be a football fan and believe that Mark Brunell can quarterback a team into the playoffs is beyond me. Every single pass was a duck. He has no zip on the ball at all. And Portis is slightly above average at best.
You're a couple of injuries on defense away from not being remotely competitive.
Portis is slightly above average? Ha! That is like an Eagles fan saying that Correll Buckhalter will go to the Pro Bowl while he is on IR.
As far as what you said about injuries, what does that have to do with anything? The same thing can be said about ALL 32 teams.
your right. Portis sucks.
By the way, Moss' TD's weren't a huge coinicidence considering:
QuoteAccording to Portis, Moss discovered that the defense was biting on a move he had been using during the game and convinced Coach Joe Gibbs to devise the play-calling around him. That move proved to be the difference between a win and a loss.
http://www.thehogs.net/content/main.php?id=548
Quote from: Jake on September 21, 2005, 03:30:31 PM
Portis is slightly above average? Ha! That is like an Eagles fan saying that Correll Buckhalter will go to the Pro Bowl while he is on IR.
As far as what you said about injuries, what does that have to do with anything? The same thing can be said about ALL 32 teams.
So, you're saying that Portis is worse than average? OK, you're right. I was being nice.
As for injuries, some teams are deep. Others (like the taterskins) have wildly overpaid crappy players, so their depth is suspect at best. I don't know if you were watching Monday night's game, but the taterskins played like out and out ass for 56 minutes. Against a good team, that's plenty of time to lose the game.
You guys love to twist stuff around, don't you?
I don't feel I need to clarify anything. It's a simple analogy of exaggerations.
I'm out for now. I'm not "slinking away." I'll be back later.
Right. You suck at analogies, because you couldn't even do it the right way.
Your hope for your team is cute, but the team itself stinks.
I'm not even sure how to get the point across to Skins fans any more. We hear the same thing every year.
" (Insert head coach du jour's name) has this team headed in a new direction. Just look, we're (insert meaningless, early season won-loss record). The Eagles finally have some competition for the division. I really think that (random offseason move, overpriced free agent, ungodly contract extension, management decision, draft pick, court ruling) is already beginning to show dividends."
Same thing, year after year, and by week 9 they have gone away, not to be heard from again until the week after their team trades away all of their draft picks for an aging defensive tackle. Do they not see this pattern? Are they completely blind to it? It's ridiculous how we could just script these conversations months and years before they happen. What a joke.
You forgot "coreskins"
taterskins=Phillies
With worse fans.
The Phillies have fans?
Quote from: MDS on September 21, 2005, 03:54:36 PM
taterskins=Phillies
With worse fans.
Which is saying a lot, because Phillies fans are a pathetic bunch. But hey, at least they know their team sucks. Even when they're winning, they know their team sucks. It's called realism. Pattern recognition. These are attributes that Skins fans do not possess.
Yup. It doesn't stop me watching and hoping, but I know, deep down, that they're a loser organization who will never win anything. Sadly, taterskins fans are too blinded by their manlove for Gibbs and Snyder to realize that. Excuse me, Coach Gibbs and Mr. Snyder. My bad.
Quote from: rjs246 on September 21, 2005, 11:04:49 AM
Quote from: Jake on September 21, 2005, 10:55:58 AM
I think the Gatorade bath was cool. Portis and Rock Cartwright were the culprits. It shows we have energy and they do care about Gibbs and what he is trying to get this team to achieve.
Of course you do. You're an idiot. It was the second week of the season. Any team/coach/player that can't act like a professional after winning one game early in the season is a farging pathetic joke. But hey. Way to win in week 2. Good job.
It was the first week of the season. Any team/coach/player that can't like a professional before winning one game is a farging pathetic joke. But hey. Way to lose in week 1. Good job.
::)
Pots calling the kettles black I see.
Quote from: Chris Luva Luva on September 22, 2005, 01:53:21 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on September 21, 2005, 11:04:49 AM
Quote from: Jake on September 21, 2005, 10:55:58 AM
I think the Gatorade bath was cool. Portis and Rock Cartwright were the culprits. It shows we have energy and they do care about Gibbs and what he is trying to get this team to achieve.
Of course you do. You're an idiot. It was the second week of the season. Any team/coach/player that can't act like a professional after winning one game early in the season is a farging pathetic joke. But hey. Way to win in week 2. Good job.
It was the first week of the season. Any team/coach/player that can't like a professional before winning one game is a farging pathetic joke. But hey. Way to lose in week 1. Good job.
::)
Pots calling the kettles black I see.
Maybe if you try again, we might understand your point. But I think you'll have to back away from the drugs for a while...
Quote from: Chris Luva Luva on September 22, 2005, 01:53:21 AM
It was the first week of the season. Any team/coach/player that can't like a professional before winning one game is a farging pathetic joke. But hey. Way to lose in week 1. Good job.
Pots calling the kettles black I see.
So you're saying that getting your team pumped up before a game is the same thing as dumping gatorade on your coach after a completely meaningless week two victory? I hope you are saying that, because then I'll be able to ignore and discount everything you say around here from now on.
I'll be able to ignore what 'Chris Luva Luva' says regardless.
Quote from: Chris Luva Luva on September 22, 2005, 01:53:21 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on September 21, 2005, 11:04:49 AM
Quote from: Jake on September 21, 2005, 10:55:58 AM
I think the Gatorade bath was cool. Portis and Rock Cartwright were the culprits. It shows we have energy and they do care about Gibbs and what he is trying to get this team to achieve.
Of course you do. You're an idiot. It was the second week of the season. Any team/coach/player that can't act like a professional after winning one game early in the season is a farging pathetic joke. But hey. Way to win in week 2. Good job.
It was the first week of the season. Any team/coach/player that can't like a professional before winning one game is a farging pathetic joke. But hey. Way to lose in week 1. Good job.
::)
Pots calling the kettles black I see.
That makes absolutely no sense what-so-ever.
(http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/3991/img15904xq.jpg)
Please stop. You're killing me.
What's with the gloves?
They all look like 'receivers' to me.
I like how they put themselves on their poster.
I read this at cnnsi.com:
Quotetaterskins LB LaVar Arrington, who previously has expressed unhappiness with this coaching staff, is too proud to ask why he's not playing more.
-- Washington Times
Why wouldn't they play him in anything other than dime packages?
I would wet my pants if we could somehow get Lavar.
Quote from: phattymatty on September 22, 2005, 12:10:48 PM
I would wet my pants if we could somehow get Lavar.
Meh. He'd probably be an upgrade over Adams but after missing so much time and not even being able to start on the skins... I don't think we need or really want his dumb crippled ass.
Lavar's freakish abilities at 50% would be better than most NFL LBs.
Quote from: phattymatty on September 22, 2005, 12:25:46 PM
Lavar's freakish abilities at 50% would be better than most NFL LBs.
Yeah, but Lavar's freakish idiocy would not be able to comprehend Jim Johnson's defensive scheme.
(http://img350.imageshack.us/img350/636/img15379wu.jpg)
What the...
Quote from: phattymatty on September 22, 2005, 12:25:46 PM
Lavar's freakish abilities at 50% would be better than most NFL LBs.
Dude, you're remembering too much of college. He hasn't done dick in the NFL. And shtein, when was the last time he even had an impact on a game? He totally is a physical freak, but he's got one of the best defensive coaches coaching him right now and he can't crack the starting lineup. That screams bad news. Of course he'd probably come to philly and be a pro-bowler since we love taking castoffs, so sure, what the hell, but I wouldn't be too excited about it.
He'd get more money than the Eagles know he's worth elsewhere, though.
By the way, are you both also PSU alums? Jerks.
Yes.
Yes.
Bling Bling!! I guess the combined over/under on that ice is $11.
(http://img350.imageshack.us/img350/5227/img15393wm.jpg)
Stop. Please. He has a shirt, with a tree on it, that says 'RIP'. Oh god. No more.
He looks like Bud Bundy.
:-D :-D :-D
That's gotta be Eagles fans making fun of taterskins dorks.
There's no way anyone could be that lame in real life. No way. Not even Skins fans.
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on September 22, 2005, 01:39:43 PM
That's gotta be Eagles fans making fun of taterskins dorks.
There's no way anyone could be that lame in real life. No way. Not even Skins fans.
Fortunately for us they actually are real life Skins fans.
Darwinism is a lie.
Check out their gangsta message board.
http://deadtreecrew.proboards30.com/index.cgi
No arguments here.
:-D
(http://www.thehogs.net/forum/images/smiles/lipsrsealed.gif)
Quote from: Jake on September 22, 2005, 02:16:51 PM
:-D
(http://www.thehogs.net/forum/images/smiles/lipsrsealed.gif)
This is the "laugh at the taterskins" thread, so good work.
Quote from: FFatPatt on September 22, 2005, 02:37:11 PM
Quote from: Jake on September 22, 2005, 02:16:51 PM
:-D
(http://www.thehogs.net/forum/images/smiles/lipsrsealed.gif)
This is the "laugh at the taterskins" thread, so good work.
I'm not laughin at the Skins. I'm laughing at the three Jamie Kennedy's.
Quote from: Jake on September 22, 2005, 03:03:57 PM
I'm not laughin at the Skins. I'm laughing at the three Jamie Kennedy's.
You better watch yo back... Dudes will cap yo ass.
With their water guns... ouch.
They'z gangsta n shtein.
i heard a rumor that rjs was once a member of the DTC.
Quote from: T_Section224 on September 22, 2005, 05:08:10 PM
i heard a rumor that rjs was once a member of the DTC.
I heard a rumor that RJS used to get locked in his locker by members of the DTC.
I heard a rumor that rjs' street name is "The Mayor."
Looks like he's got a hemorrhoid problem.
Quote from: phattymatty on September 22, 2005, 12:28:03 PM
(http://img350.imageshack.us/img350/636/img15379wu.jpg)
You'd have a roid problem too if you shoved a parking cone up your ass.
The DTC is my homies. We's tight and shtein.
Just kidding, I pooped in their mouths. They loved it.
My new fridays with Art feature:
QuoteJoe Gibbs presser -- Right after Gibbs speaks, I corner him and get a quote. He was blowing me off until he heard "ExtremeSkins." He turned to me, eyes bright and thanked the fans for everything. That was a great feeling.
Quote15 minutes after the game -- Entering the locker room for the first time. I'm in something of a daze. Not sure how I got here. Not sure how happy a person or team can be. I almost run over Karl Swanson, who I hug. I just stand back taking this in. Smiling faces everywhere. Karl turns down my efforts to give Dan a hug and a fan quote but, hey, you can't win them all . Marcus Washington and Robert Royal singing and just jabbering. Larry and Sonny interviewing Moss, Brunell. Walk up to Jon Jansen and talk to him about going to the moon, where he vacations in Michigan. Talk to Sean Taylor and thank him for keeping his promise, though he thought I was media and didn't want to chat.
QuoteSitting in the press box drinking two beers with Eric. Looking for the board which is crashing out . Nervous energy draining me. The only thing I can think of is if being a fan of this team can lead to something this great, imagine what being a fan of a great team could lead to .
QuoteLast clip is of Joe Gibbs after his presser. I cornered him and introduced myself. You should have seen him light up. He really appreciates the fans guys. It was a great moment. He just wanted to get out of there and he stopped and just got so happy when I told him I was from Extremeskins. He does appreciate the fans and it shows.
We really should have a couple of DTC avatars for this board.
I want to laugh and vomit at the same time. whats a good word for that.
I'm amazed Art can hold down two whole beers.
Quote from: MURP on September 23, 2005, 10:29:58 AM
I want to laugh and vomit at the same time. whats a good word for that.
Laumit (pronounced la-mit)
So happy drunks get laminated?
that's bizarre
Serisously, DTC avatars. Do it.
You do it.
No. You do it.
rjs, how you like me now!
Well struck.
I want a 'The Mayor' avatar.
Quote from: rjs246 on September 23, 2005, 01:25:29 PM
Well struck.
I want a 'The Mayor' avatar.
SHAZAAM!
(http://www.boomspeed.com/superpsn/mayor.jpg)
Great. Now make one people can actually use. :yay
Quote from: General_Failure on September 23, 2005, 06:47:37 PM
Great. Now make one people can actually use. :yay
<------------------- It's the same one.
Quote from: MDS on September 23, 2005, 10:26:46 AM
My new fridays with Art feature:
QuoteJoe Gibbs presser -- Right after Gibbs speaks, I corner him and get a quote. He was blowing me off until he heard "ExtremeSkins." He turned to me, eyes bright and thanked the fans for everything. That was a great feeling.
Quote15 minutes after the game -- Entering the locker room for the first time. I'm in something of a daze. Not sure how I got here. Not sure how happy a person or team can be. I almost run over Karl Swanson, who I hug. I just stand back taking this in. Smiling faces everywhere. Karl turns down my efforts to give Dan a hug and a fan quote but, hey, you can't win them all . Marcus Washington and Robert Royal singing and just jabbering. Larry and Sonny interviewing Moss, Brunell. Walk up to Jon Jansen and talk to him about going to the moon, where he vacations in Michigan. Talk to Sean Taylor and thank him for keeping his promise, though he thought I was media and didn't want to chat.
QuoteSitting in the press box drinking two beers with Eric. Looking for the board which is crashing out . Nervous energy draining me. The only thing I can think of is if being a fan of this team can lead to something this great, imagine what being a fan of a great team could lead to .
QuoteLast clip is of Joe Gibbs after his presser. I cornered him and introduced myself. You should have seen him light up. He really appreciates the fans guys. It was a great moment. He just wanted to get out of there and he stopped and just got so happy when I told him I was from Extremeskins. He does appreciate the fans and it shows.
:-D Priceless
Why do I think Art is like that guy in the NFL Shop commercials who hides in the dirty jocks bin....
I love how he makes it sound like Gibbs was waiting to see him. I think his wife should be worried about the man-love for Gibbs.
He makes it feel like he had something to do with it, and like they won the superbowl. It was a week 2 game at Dallas.
QuoteView Poll Results: Who is the best team in football after two weeks??
Colts 89 26.10%
Steelers 93 27.27%
Eagles 19 5.57%
Patriots 24 7.04%
Chiefs 15 4.40%
taterskins (Haha sry I just had to) 91 26.69%
Other 10 2.93%
Samrt phans
haaa haaa taterskins beat dallas just like dallas beats us, we farged them up and half of them are to delusional right now to notice thta they have just lost http://www.dallascowboyfansunited.com/forums/showthread.php?t=504
We did the gatorade thing because we are classless mo fos--right? knowing that the original gatorade man aka the farging tuna was across on the other end of the sidelines.
We won and will stay at the 1.00 till atleast week 4 and i know we will win that too. I think it is funny you are more upset about us dumping gatorade over our coach than you being 1-1 right now. You beat the 9ers and have done nothing special so far.
taterskins are 2-0 for another week
The point is, Dingus, your team did nothing so special as to warrant a juicy shower.
we won thats all that matters, i don't care if we gave gibbs a shower we won, we are 2-0 in a strong division that i promise you will give you a run for your money, i expect dallas to sweep you this year, i can't say the same for the skins but dallas and that 3-4 is gonna stop your passing game.
Yeah, 'cause they gave your high powered offense fits for a full 60 minutes.
Quote from: General_Failure on September 23, 2005, 09:55:04 PM
Yeah, 'cause they gave your high powered offense fits for a full 60 minutes.
yeah your right our offense destroyed them bitches
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 23, 2005, 09:53:13 PM
we won thats all that matters, i don't care if we gave gibbs a shower we won, we are 2-0 in a strong division that i promise you will give you a run for your money, i expect dallas to sweep you this year, i can't say the same for the skins but dallas and that 3-4 is gonna stop your passing game.
and i expect mcnabb and to to make out on the sidelines. while reading concretefield articles, and wearing phillies uniforms.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 23, 2005, 09:55:53 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on September 23, 2005, 09:55:04 PM
Yeah, 'cause they gave your high powered offense fits for a full 60 minutes.
yeah your right our offense destroyed them bitches
You are retarded.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 23, 2005, 09:53:13 PM
i expect dallas to sweep you this year
Wanna put your money where your mouth is?
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 23, 2005, 09:55:53 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on September 23, 2005, 09:55:04 PM
Yeah, 'cause they gave your high powered offense fits for a full 60 minutes.
yeah your right our offense destroyed them bitches
Your normally
inept offense. Noodlearm looked halfway decent for two minutes.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 23, 2005, 10:00:15 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC on September 23, 2005, 09:57:57 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 23, 2005, 09:55:53 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on September 23, 2005, 09:55:04 PM
Yeah, 'cause they gave your high powered offense fits for a full 60 minutes.
yeah your right our offense destroyed them bitches
You are retarded.
o ho you really got me
No friend, in this case, I think you really got
you there.
Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC on September 23, 2005, 10:01:33 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 23, 2005, 10:00:15 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC on September 23, 2005, 09:57:57 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 23, 2005, 09:55:53 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on September 23, 2005, 09:55:04 PM
Yeah, 'cause they gave your high powered offense fits for a full 60 minutes.
yeah your right our offense destroyed them bitches
You are retarded.
o ho you really got me
No friend, in this case, I think you really got you there.
that almost made sense
Smack your face into a wall a couple more times, you'll get it.
Quote from: SD_Eagle on September 23, 2005, 09:58:19 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 23, 2005, 09:53:13 PM
i expect dallas to sweep you this year
Wanna put your money where your mouth is?
Hello? If you're so confident lets make a friendly wager.
Quote from: SD_Eagle on September 23, 2005, 10:04:18 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on September 23, 2005, 09:58:19 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 23, 2005, 09:53:13 PM
i expect dallas to sweep you this year
Wanna put your money where your mouth is?
Hello? If you're so confident lets make a friendly wager.
there is no way i would bet on dallas of all teams, i have come back to this sight many times and if dallas does lose you can say all the shtein you want to me, i really don't care. I really feel there is no way you sweep them this year.
Quote from: General_Failure on September 23, 2005, 10:03:50 PM
Smack your face into a wall a couple more times, you'll get it.
Or I could spell it out for you.....
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y133/Bobberton/douchebag2.jpg)
Which is totally the same as saying they're going to sweep up. You dance well.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 23, 2005, 10:06:01 PM
there is no way i would bet on dallas of all teams, i have come back to this sight many times and if dallas does lose you can say all the shtein you want to me, i really don't care. I really feel there is no way you sweep them this year.
Seeing him dance on this SITE is quite the sight. O ho!
Quote from: General_Failure on September 23, 2005, 10:07:13 PM
Which is totally the same as saying they're going to sweep up. You dance well.
no sir, i say that they will sweep you, but i was just saying that is not complete certainty therefore i just also put in that you won't sweep them. I think that there is an equal chance that they win 1 or 2 games and a far less chance that you win 2 games, That is it.
Dance you magnificent bastich!
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 23, 2005, 10:09:59 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on September 23, 2005, 10:07:13 PM
Which is totally the same as saying they're going to sweep up. You dance well.
no sir, i say that they will sweep you, but i was just saying that is not complete certainty therefore i just also put in that you won't sweep them. I think that there is an equal chance that they win 1 or 2 games and a far less chance that you win 2 games, That is it.
:sly
(http://www.libertycore.org/Retarded%20Boy.jpg)
/\/\/\/\/\/\ Bigskinbauer after a "Gibbs meets fans day." You rock dude. /\/\/\/\/\ :yay
Let's just assume that's saliva in his beard.
:puke
Quote from: General_Failure on September 23, 2005, 10:27:18 PM
Let's just assume that's saliva in his beard.
I don't understand. If it
isn't saliva.......what
is it? :paranoid
Dammit, Sarge! I wanted that goddamned avatar.
Quote from: General_Failure on September 23, 2005, 10:27:18 PM
Let's just assume that's saliva in his beard.
:-D :puke :-D :puke
He shore does got some pearly white teeth though.
Quote from: rjs246 on September 23, 2005, 11:42:37 PM
Dammit, Sarge! I wanted that goddamned avatar.
Then take it. The only reason I used it as an avatar is because GF didn't think it would work as one. So go ahead and use it man. That's what I made it for anyway. :D
Art gets his hopes up and asks Clinton Portis about the fans and then Portis stuffs Art like defenses have been stuffing Portis in his Washington career:
QuoteFrom Art
I noticed you were on one end of the Gatorade shower given to Coach Gibbs after the Dallas win. You seemed really happy not only to win and beat Dallas, but also for the Coach. Were the players aware of how important the Dallas game was to the fans and the Coach?
Clinton Portis
I don't think we were thinking so much about the fans and the coach at the time—this was an important game for us. It was a divisional game for us, it was a game we needed to win. We wanted to get off on a positive note. It was a great momentum builder and a great start to our season, going into our bye week 2-0 and coming back having Seattle. You don't want to spend your bye week recovering from a loss.
I wonder if arthur cried knowing that Clinton didn't shower the fans with praise.
I gotta give Portis props on this one:
QuoteFrom Pharmaceutical taterskin
Just wondering whether you have retired "the belt" or will you be busting it out later this year?
Quote:
Clinton Portis
Nah, the belt's retired, man. I've got something better than the belt to bring out. Once I brought out the belt, I think everybody in the world became the champ of something. You got the people's champ, you got the player's champ, you got the world champ, you got this champ. You know, I saw Freddy Mitchell with a belt, so I knew the belt had to be played out, 'cause Freddy Mitchell ain't done nothing and he's walking around with a belt on. You know, I've stepped my game up and I'm on a whole 'nother level.
:-D
First time I ever praise someone of Portis' ilk. Talkin shtein on Freddie gets a :yay in my book.
It ain't like takin' shots at Freddie is hard to do. Even Reno can do it.
(http://img373.imageshack.us/img373/7938/charley7bw.jpg)
Oh. My. God. :-D
Ummm...is that a dude or a chick on the right...not kidding here either :paranoid
Quote from: SD_Eagle on September 26, 2005, 12:08:50 AM
Ummm...is that a dude or a chick on the right...not kidding here either :paranoid
I was just thinking the same thing. At first I was like "I love chicks with slutty, secretary glasses." Then I was like "Hey, where's her tits and why does she have an Adam's apple?" :puke
You get turned on by EMO glasses?
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v481/bubba9497/ad46affa.jpg)
Losers.
with that score it appears that we were winners
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 26, 2005, 06:49:50 PM
with that score it appears that we were winners
Actually I would argue that the Eagles were the winner of that game. Two zesty teams beating the shtein out of each other with the better of the two teams pissing it away to the weaker team at the end. Yeah, I'd say the Eagles won.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 26, 2005, 06:49:50 PM
with that score it appears that we were winners
No. That score indicates that you were
winning. You'd need the score from the end of the game to know who won, but nobody actually watched it.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v481/bubba9497/ad46affa.jpg)
This picture will haunt Skin fans when they witness noodle-armed Brutal trying to throw a 20-yard pass in cold and windy December.
They'd have been better off being shut-out in the long run. At least Gibbs would've tried something new during the bye instead of releasing a punter.
Insert your own to joke to "Hog Fest"
(http://photobucket.com/albums/v80/NoCalMike/th_100_0005.jpg)
This guy starts for an NFL team. Ha.
(http://www.taterskins.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/EPHKJPBDKGPO/Brunell3.jpg)
Look at his shteineating grin to. He's thinking, "farging Suckers".
Psst...aren't the Skins still paying Trotter this year? ^-^
Hell, I think they're still paying Bruce Smith.
They wish they were still paying Deion.
And Brad Johnson
And Jeff George
soon to be 3-0 :o, you guys are looking up from the bottom, and a couple of severe injuries to key players, so please, hold the "pointing and laughing" to a minimum. :paranoid
I love archer. He's like Art's little, gayer brother.
Aaaaaahhhh .... no. The laughter will continue until the Skins do something impressive.
(http://www.concretefield.net/forum/Smileys/classic/laugh.gif)
Quote from: archer on September 27, 2005, 10:43:05 PM
soon to be 3-0 :o, you guys are looking up from the bottom, and a couple of severe injuries to key players, so please, hold the "pointing and laughing" to a minimum. :paranoid
Why?
:-D :-D :-D
Quote from: archer on September 27, 2005, 10:43:05 PM
soon to be 3-0 :o, you guys are looking up from the bottom, and a couple of severe injuries to key players, so please, hold the "pointing and laughing" to a minimum. :paranoid
Highly doubt you beat Seattle. If you do, I'd be shocked. Really shocked.
And when are you going to get some DL who actually are good?
You know, the 4skinz could be last place by Sunday night. :-D
Dude...
The Skins are actually FAVORED this week against Seattle.
Washington -2 over Seattle...I'm bettin that right now. Seriously.
The oddsmakers are smoking crack. Better bet that spread soon because it will be going down fast to even things out.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on September 28, 2005, 09:04:47 AM
Quote from: archer on September 27, 2005, 10:43:05 PM
soon to be 3-0 :o, you guys are looking up from the bottom, and a couple of severe injuries to key players, so please, hold the "pointing and laughing" to a minimum. :paranoid
Highly doubt you beat Seattle. If you do, I'd be shocked. Really shocked.
And when are you going to get some DL who actually are good?
Really, and that's why we held opponents to 3.1ypc last year?
Last year ruled!
Quote from: twatson on September 28, 2005, 04:31:57 PM
Really, and that's why we held opponents to 3.1ypc last year?
And how many points per game?
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 28, 2005, 04:38:04 PM
Quote from: twatson on September 28, 2005, 04:31:57 PM
Really, and that's why we held opponents to 3.1ypc last year?
And how many points per game?
Well th DEFENSE gave up 13.9375, best in the NFL. Unfotrunately, offense and ST gave up 2.625 :(.
Quote from: rjs246 on September 28, 2005, 04:32:42 PM
Last year ruled!
Not really, except for the Super Bowl of course. ;)
...just kidding.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 28, 2005, 04:38:04 PM
Quote from: twatson on September 28, 2005, 04:31:57 PM
Really, and that's why we held opponents to 3.1ypc last year?
And how many points per game?
well that was about 20 pages ago and it was found that the skins gave up less points so again we WERE the better d, now it is a new year and we can start comparing stats around the time the skins and e-girls play their first game.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 28, 2005, 05:24:55 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 28, 2005, 04:38:04 PM
Quote from: twatson on September 28, 2005, 04:31:57 PM
Really, and that's why we held opponents to 3.1ypc last year?
And how many points per game?
well that was about 20 pages ago and it was found that the skins gave up less points so again we WERE the better d, now it is a new year and we can start comparing stats around the time the skins and e-girls play their first game.
Your D sucks
his name is twatson?
Quote from: SD_Eagle on September 28, 2005, 05:28:52 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on September 28, 2005, 05:24:55 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 28, 2005, 04:38:04 PM
Quote from: twatson on September 28, 2005, 04:31:57 PM
Really, and that's why we held opponents to 3.1ypc last year?
And how many points per game?
well that was about 20 pages ago and it was found that the skins gave up less points so again we WERE the better d, now it is a new year and we can start comparing stats around the time the skins and e-girls play their first game.
Your D sucks
"Does not, does to, does not....." Stop please!!
I said it before and I'll say it again; for like the past 6 or 7 years the team that lost in the Super Bowl struggled to even make the playoffs the following season. This is not because the team was bad, 3 years ago it was the Patriots, but because of a bunch of other factors that had nothing to do with the talent on the team. Things like injuries and players getting big heads thinking they're bigger than the team and wanting to rework contracts, also players not being as "hungry" to get to the big game. All of these things are affecting the Eagles in a BIG way this year. It's not going to be pretty for you with McNabb and Aker's injury, Westbrook and T.O. wanting more money and feeling slighted by the Organization (I just don't see why they won't make Westbrook happy, he IS your team). Next year might reallign themselves for the Eagles, but not this year, the cards are stacked, in a big way against you. Again, it's not that the Eagles are'nt a talented team, it's just the byproduct of losing the Super Bowl, take it to the bank.
Quote from: Larry on September 28, 2005, 09:25:36 AM
You know, the 4skinz could be last place by Sunday night. :-D
you should feel lucky if you get a win in K.C.
Quote from: archer on September 28, 2005, 10:33:11 PM
I said it before and I'll say it again; for like the past 6 or 7 years the team that lost in the Super Bowl struggled to even make the playoffs the following season. This is not because the team was bad, 3 years ago it was the Patriots, but because of a bunch of other factors that had nothing to do with the talent on the team.
The Pats missed the SB after winning the SB, not losing it.
The eagles having players thinking they are bigger than the team??? NO couldn't be
Quote from: archer on September 28, 2005, 10:35:09 PM
Quote from: Larry on September 28, 2005, 09:25:36 AM
You know, the 4skinz could be last place by Sunday night. :-D
you should feel lucky if you get a win in K.C.
you should feel lucky if Brunell passes for over 100 yards. :-D
It's that magic Gibbs wand again. Things are going to be a certain way because Skinsfan says so and that's that.
Until someone in this division shows an ounce of spine the Eagles are going to stroll into the playoffs.
Quote from: General_Failure on September 29, 2005, 03:21:27 AM
It's that magic Gibbs wand again. Things are going to be a certain way because Skinsfan says so and that's that.
Until someone in this division shows an ounce of spine the Eagles are going to stroll into the playoffs.
Dawkins and Trotter will promptly "break" that spine in two.
Doesn't the team with the last place record in the division the previous year usually get the first bye the following season?
Yeah, I think so.
So, who had the bye last weekend again?
When can I stop laughing at how stupid these Skins fans are who actually think a 3-0 record is something to be bragging about?
My sides are starting to hurt.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 29, 2005, 07:42:27 AM
When can I stop laughing at how stupid these Skins fans are who actually think a 3-0 record is something to be bragging about?
My sides are starting to hurt.
It could be a sports hernia. Get it checked out.
Quote from: puffmd33 on September 29, 2005, 11:39:04 AM
It could be a sports hernia. Get it checked out.
Nah, it's my back. I blew it out humping your mom last night. Neech.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 29, 2005, 07:42:27 AM
When can I stop laughing at how stupid these Skins fans are who actually think a 3-0 record is something to be bragging about?
My sides are starting to hurt.
Ya see, that's the thing...they are only 2-0 and they certainly won't make it to 3-0. They will be torched by the Hawks.
Cocky skins fans...your team has blown for how many years now? And you are running your mouths over here? Losers!
This is from another thread but I thought it should be posted here. Talking about Westbrook's September and the case for him being player of the month instead of McNabb...
Quote from: Larry on September 29, 2005, 12:16:24 PM
The Case for Westbrook.
439 yards in 56 touches. 7.8 yards/touch leads all RBs. He's on pace for a 1000/1000 season as well.
Has scored 4 TDs and 6 plays of 20 yards+ (which equals Clinton Portis's output during his career as a Skin.)
Had no fumbles and no drops. Played error-free as far as I can tell.
Torched Keith Brooking, Julian Peterson, and Charles Woodson...all pro-bowlers.
Ha.
The Mayor's in the house!! Bling bling!!
So...no talk about Santana Moss for POTM? But...but...he got lucky and caught two big passes against the Cowboys on MNF. Shouldn't he get it? But...but...the taterskins are two and oh..oh...oh no...now we're 2-1 cuz we got blown out by the Seahawks.
So McNabb threw for 8 TDs this month. Brunell almost did that too.
cant wait to win my taterskin bets vs pg and shorebird
i don't feel like searching for it, what is the bet?
total points allowed with pg
eagles wont sweep skins with shorebird
This is some good banter going back and forth, keep it up, what fun! What sportsmanship being displayed by both sides, some good natured ribbing. Good luck this year gentleman.
My parole officer was right, deep down I am a good guy :)
archer just got done blowing gibbs. thats why he is especially giddy today.
Quote from: MDS on September 29, 2005, 10:34:01 PM
archer just got done blowing gibbs. thats why he is especially giddy today.
Now why would you say that, I don't agree with all his moves, I for one would start Ramsey or Campbell over Brunell, take your lumps with the young guys, I don't get what he sees in Brunell.
I'm really a down to earth, level headed fan, just having some fun in this thread, as I'm sure all of you are.
And you take jokes well, too.
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 29, 2005, 01:06:09 PM
total points allowed with pg
eagles wont sweep skins with shorebird
I wonder is shorebird made that bet knowing that the Birds play the 'Skins for the last game of the year? Pretty bold to bet the Eagles backups could win that game :D
Go JT!
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 29, 2005, 12:41:05 PM
cant wait to win my taterskin bets vs pg and shorebird
So you're an Eagles fan but "can't wait" to win a cyber-bet
against the Eagles?
Quote from: henchmanUK on September 30, 2005, 11:06:13 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 29, 2005, 12:41:05 PM
cant wait to win my taterskin bets vs pg and shorebird
So you're an Eagles fan
That's where you went wrong...in believing that.
QuoteFormer taterskins star nabbed in cocaine bust
Daily News Wire Services
Timmy Smith, who set a Super Bowl rushing record when he played for the Washington taterskins in 1988, has been arrested after allegedly trying to sell cocaine to an undercover drug agent.
Smith, 41, of Denver, and his brother, Chris, of suburban Lakewood, were in custody and due in court Monday, U.S. attorney's spokesman Jeff Dorschner said yesterday. They could face charges of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine. Bond had not been set.
Authorities said the investigation has resulted in the seizure of about 2.8 pounds of cocaine and unspecified assets worth about $100,000. Search warrants were executed on houses in Denver and Lakewood, authorities said.
Smith rushed for a Super Bowl-record 204 yards and two touchdowns in the taterskins' 42-10 victory over the Denver Broncos in 1988. He gained weight the following season and never performed at the same level. He last played in the NFL in 1990 with Dallas.
He worked this summer as a youth counselor and participated in several youth football camps, authorities said.
The way it looks now, it could be tough winning the bet, but being a real fan of the Eagles, I would sooner play chess than bet on the taterskins to win anything.
Quote from: shorebird on October 01, 2005, 01:55:28 PM
The way it looks now, it could be tough winning the bet, but being a real fan of the Eagles, I would sooner play chess than bet on the taterskins to win anything.
i wouldn't go that far dude.
I was being sarcastic, but I'm not too awful worried anyway, the taterskin lover is cheap, I'll have more in postage and money order fees than the actual bet anyway if I lose.
I hope taterskins fans are enjoying the last few hours of the Skins sitting alone at 1st in the NFC East. It's like an eclipse. Probably won't see it again for several decades.
Little Ms. Gibbs wrote a new article. And, being a master in the field of journalism, this one is truly something special.
QuoteWhen Santana Moss caught the go-ahead touchdown pass from Mark Brunell, I found myself acting a bit like one of those head-standing beer bong guys who get the laughs at parties described by Mark Steven in last week's ExtremeSkins Fan View
I guess Art was a bigger loser than me in college. Now that is sad.
QuoteNow having cheated the Chicago Bears out of their rightful chance of victory against the taterskins with our unsportsmanlike cheering, we face a critical juncture as fans of this team as we head into our home game against the Seattle Seahawks.
Yup. The taterskins fans won them that game. Go collect your paychecks guys. It was all you.
The entire article is saying something you can sum up in two sentences: Fans can cheer and be loud at games. That article that said it was bushleague is stupid. Yea, he's right. But, to Art's credit, he still sounds like a fairy.
Entire article here: GibbsGibbsGibbsGibbs (http://www.taterskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=10727)
Oh, Arthur. What a pile o' shtein.
Great for laughs though.
Quote from: shorebird on October 01, 2005, 01:55:28 PM
The way it looks now, it could be tough winning the bet, but being a real fan of the Eagles, I would sooner play chess than bet on the taterskins to win anything.
With apologies to Morpheus:
"Would that include a race to the bottom of the NFC East?"
No, it wouldn't, I'd bet on that, and anything else that involves the Skins and last place.
You got me on that one.
3-0 ! it is something to be happy about, you guys will be very lucky to go 3-1
Congratulations, you barely beat another inept team.
Bears, Seahawks, Cowboys.
Congrats, you're slightly better than bad.
You're one step away from mediocrity. So big!
Congrats on your big step from absolute sucking worse than any other team in the NFL to just sucking.
awww you guys are just jealous,2-2 ain't so bad
wow you beat two teams with a combined record of 1-3 not including your games against them
we beat teams that without our games included went 5-2
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 02, 2005, 05:16:18 PM
awww you guys are just jealous,2-2 ain't so bad
wow you beat two teams with a combined record of 1-5
we beat teams that without our games included went 5-2
Did the Eagles game end already?
Quote from: PhillyGirl on October 02, 2005, 05:18:27 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 02, 2005, 05:16:18 PM
awww you guys are just jealous,2-2 ain't so bad
wow you beat two teams with a combined record of 1-5
we beat teams that without our games included went 5-2
Did the Eagles game end already?
i don't know maybe they watched some film of the taterskins comeback, maybe reid took some notes
Dallas sucks, Seahawks suck, Bears suck.
You know it. You won by a combined 6 points. Beat someone good, or demolish bad teams then come talk.
Quote from: MDS on October 02, 2005, 05:20:42 PM
Dallas sucks, Seahawks suck, Bears suck.
You know it. You won by a combined 6 points. Beat someone good, or demolish bad teams then come talk.
well you beat a 0-3 team and a 1-2 team so ........
the best team you beat were the niners
42-3
Oakland game with no kicker, banged up qb and the fact that Oakland isnt all that bad. Thats why it was close.
Quote from: MDS on October 02, 2005, 05:22:58 PM
42-3
Oakland game with no kicker, banged up qb and the fact that Oakland isnt all that bad. Thats why it was close.
you are bragging about beating the 9ers
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 02, 2005, 05:19:47 PM
i don't know maybe they watched some film of the taterskins comeback, maybe reid took some notes
Dont' make me throw up with comments like that. You're being an ignoramus and its annoying me.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 02, 2005, 05:16:18 PM
awww you guys are just jealous,2-2 ain't so bad
wow you beat two teams with a combined record of 1-3 not including your games against them
we beat teams that without our games included went 5-2
And those teams beat the perennial NFL powerhouses Arizona, Detroit and San Francisco. See, we can do that stupid shtein too.
Guess the ' refs hate the Skins' conspiracy doesn't exist anymore, especially after that AWFUL PI call on Boulware inside the 5.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on October 02, 2005, 05:18:27 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 02, 2005, 05:16:18 PM
awww you guys are just jealous,2-2 ain't so bad
wow you beat two teams with a combined record of 1-5
we beat teams that without our games included went 5-2
Did the Eagles game end already?
Ahem. Eat shtein, Skins fan.
The children are right to laugh at you, Ralph.
After that unwarrented smack before the game was over I call for a one day ban. See what happenes when you anger the Football Gods? :evil
If we ban him we can't hear his latest spinjob.
taterskins barely beating the zesty Seahawks > Eagles demolishing the Cheifs on the road
Gibbs is god.
I luv me sum Art
QuoteCredit goes to the Seahawks for playing so well. That's a very good team, which we knew. We're a very good team, which they didn't know. Now they do
Idiot.
When i am wrong i am wrong. Reid must have taken some notes ;). That was a good game, i wouldn't exactly say you demolished them but you played great during the second half. Atleast we can be happy about dallas being at the bottom of the strongest division in the league...or atleast the nfc
taterskins are amazing. they teach everyone how to do everything. hail gibbs.
The taterskins taught me to respect my body and to stop cutting myself. Also, they taught me how to build a bird feeder. Thanks Gibbs!
Quote from: MDS on October 02, 2005, 07:48:56 PM
I luv me sum Art
QuoteCredit goes to the Seahawks for playing so well. That's a very good team, which we knew. We're a very good team, which they didn't know. Now they do
Idiot.
Since when are the Seahawks a good team? Oh, I forget, whenever a team plays the taterskins they're all world. Unless the taterskins lose, then they're overrated. The World According to Art must be an interesting place to live.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 02, 2005, 07:50:04 PM
When i am wrong i am wrong. Reid must have taken some notes ;). That was a good game, i wouldn't exactly say you demolished them but you played great during the second half. Atleast we can be happy about dallas being at the bottom of the strongest division in the league...or atleast the nfc
Skins still blow. That PI called on Boulware at the 5 was complete bullshtein. The Skins are the worst 3-0 team in the history of sports.
Did anyone catch Gibbs on his hands and knees looking towards the ground during the overtime game winning kick? He couldn't bear to watch it. That would make a killer avatar.
Washington still can't score for shtein.
Terrible PI call on Boulware = TD
Two missed FG's by that clown Brown.
Come back when you can effing score.
Quote from: shorebird on October 02, 2005, 08:33:30 PM
Did anyone catch Gibbs on his hands and knees looking towards the ground during the overtime game winning kick? He couldn't bear to watch it. That would make a killer avatar.
yup that is what it had to of been
Nice grammar.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 02, 2005, 05:19:47 PM
i don't know maybe they watched some film of the taterskins comeback, maybe reid took some notes
No, the Eagles made a comeback with an overpowering second half.
The Skins came back with 2 big plays and nothing else all game.
Big difference.
Josh Brown is getting BJs in the parking lot from the DTC as we speak.
Quote from: phattymatty on October 02, 2005, 08:53:11 PM
Josh Brown is getting BJs in the parking lot from the DTC as we speak.
The Mayor must be havin fun with his gold cone tonight.
Hi guys ;D
All hail thy mighty head coach. Defeat the lethal Seahawks.
Quote from: MDS on October 02, 2005, 11:17:18 PM
All hail thy mighty head coach. Defeat the lethal Seahawks.
here here!!
Quote from: archer on October 02, 2005, 11:14:55 PM
Hi guys ;D
Yes, you still suck. Congrats on beating the team that just flops every year. Glad you feel so good about yourself.
I think the Skins queers getting all jazzed up about their juggernaut of a team is kinda cute.
Let them enjoy their brief reign as division leaders. We all know how their season is going to end, though, don't we?
>:D
QuoteI'm going out on a limb and labeling the Washington taterskins the worst 3-0 team in NFL history. And that's coming off their best game of the season by far.
-Don Banks of Sports Illustarted
The Skins play Denver next.
I think the Broncos are going to kill the Skins.
Tony Bruno also spent about 10 minutes talking about the fraudulent record the Skins have. Said they are possibly the worst 3-0 team ever in the history of the NFL. :D
While I have to endure another week of taterskin's fans auto-fellating, I thought this was an extraordinary post found on Extremeforeskins. I don't think I need to say who wrote it.
QuoteOk, we all know Lavar either didn't play at all or played very little as a coaching decision. We heard the Glazer report indicating Lavar was told he "doesn't fit" and was asked to play special teams, but balked. I have NO IDEA WHATSOEVER what's going on with the situation.
Here's what I do know. Lavar is an emotional cat. He's got a radio appearance with John Thompson. If he has one of his emotional breakdowns, let's TRY very hard to create, oh, ONE thread about the situation and keep things contained there. We do not need 50 threads. Please help everyone out by restraining yourself SHOULD Lavar say something impolitic. He may be perfect. But, given how much chatter we already have on the topic, if he gets ugly with it, let's try to contain it some so the board dedicated to a 3-0 team isn't totally devoted to a player who's not playing for that 3-0 team.
If Spadaro ever said anything like this, the fans would be making sun visors from his rectum.
Quote from: Beermonkey on October 03, 2005, 03:12:00 PM
If Spadaro ever said anything like this, the fans would be making sun visors from his rectum.
I'm not sure what that means, but it cracked me up.
Quote from: rjs246 on October 03, 2005, 03:16:33 PM
Quote from: Beermonkey on October 03, 2005, 03:12:00 PM
If Spadaro ever said anything like this, the fans would be making sun visors from his rectum.
I'm not sure what that means, but it cracked me up.
I don't know either but it seemed appropriate.
lmao. trying damage control before dumbass Lavar even opens his mouth. haha.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on October 03, 2005, 07:33:07 AM
Quote from: archer on October 02, 2005, 11:14:55 PM
Hi guys ;D
Yes, you still suck. Congrats on beating the team that just flops every year. Glad you feel so good about yourself.
And the Eagles haven't beat a team with a winning record yet this year either, so what's your point. You had to pull one out your a$$ agianst the Raiders and they stink too. Our offense is no powerhouse, but teams like Baltimore and Carolina have recently had sucess with strong defenses and mediocre offenses. Atleast the agrument on who has the better defense has played itself out, I was sick of going back and forth on that one.
Quote from: archer on October 03, 2005, 08:21:41 PM
And the Eagles haven't beat a team with a winning record yet this year either, so what's your point.
Are you really that retarded?
Bears 1-2
Dallas 2-2
Seattle 2-2
So where are the teams with winning records that the Skins beat? Now, if you want to count the Cowboys and Seahags because they had winning records at the time the Skins played them, then that's fine. Add the 9ers and Chiefs to the list for the Eagles then.
Quote from: archer on October 03, 2005, 08:21:41 PM
but teams like Baltimore and Carolina have recently had sucess with strong defenses and mediocre offenses.
There in lies the problem. The Skins still don't even have a mediocre offense! A mediocre offense would be a freaking improvement of epic proportions.
You do realize that during Carolina's one year of stardom that they had a very good offense as well. Not Colts good, but good none the less. They could pass and run the ball with consistancy. They had big play capability with Smith and Muhammed and a nice running game with Davis and Foster. The Skins could only dream of having an offense like that. And incase you forgot the Panthers offense absolutely shredded a dominating Patriots defense in the Super Bowl. Hell, even when the Ravens won the SB they had an offense that could move the chains. They weren't a flashy offense they were efficient.
The Skins have struggled the last 2 weeks against mediocre defenses to put points on the board. It took them over 7 quarters before they found the endzone for the first time this year and they've been having a hard time finding it since. Hell, they had 2 weeks to prepare for Seattle and still couldn't figure out how to score on them. What was Gibbs doing the whole time? Playing bridge getting high on fiber?
Quote from: Sgt PSN on October 03, 2005, 08:32:23 PM
Quote from: archer on October 03, 2005, 08:21:41 PM
And the Eagles haven't beat a team with a winning record yet this year either, so what's your point.
Are you really that retarded?
Bears 1-2
Dallas 2-2
Seattle 2-2
So where are the teams with winning records that the Skins beat? Now, if you want to count the Cowboys and Seahags because they had winning records at the time the Skins played them, then that's fine. Add the 9ers and Chiefs to the list for the Eagles then.
Genious, notice I said "Eagles haven't beaten a team with a winning record EITHER", "either" being the key word, meaning we didn't EITHER.
Quote from: archer on October 03, 2005, 08:49:57 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on October 03, 2005, 08:32:23 PM
Quote from: archer on October 03, 2005, 08:21:41 PM
And the Eagles haven't beat a team with a winning record yet this year either, so what's your point.
Are you really that retarded?
Bears 1-2
Dallas 2-2
Seattle 2-2
So where are the teams with winning records that the Skins beat? Now, if you want to count the Cowboys and Seahags because they had winning records at the time the Skins played them, then that's fine. Add the 9ers and Chiefs to the list for the Eagles then.
Genious, notice I said "Eagles haven't beaten a team with a winning record EITHER", "either" being the key word, meaning we didn't EITHER.
you forget they choose which words they want to hear.
By the way, what the hell, this is very comical. The taterskins won. that is it, yes not to amazing teams but they won, they haven't lost. Till they lose you can't say anything. Next take away the game that you played when you do records, don't look at their record when you played them
You did beat a team over .500 in the chiefs and the skins beat 2 with the cowgirls and the seahawks
Quote from: Sgt PSN on October 03, 2005, 08:43:04 PM
Quote from: archer on October 03, 2005, 08:21:41 PM
but teams like Baltimore and Carolina have recently had sucess with strong defenses and mediocre offenses.
There in lies the problem. The Skins still don't even have a mediocre offense! A mediocre offense would be a freaking improvement of epic proportions.
You do realize that during Carolina's one year of stardom that they had a very good offense as well. Not Colts good, but good none the less. They could pass and run the ball with consistancy. They had big play capability with Smith and Muhammed and a nice running game with Davis and Foster. The Skins could only dream of having an offense like that. And incase you forgot the Panthers offense absolutely shredded a dominating Patriots defense in the Super Bowl. Hell, even when the Ravens won the SB they had an offense that could move the chains. They weren't a flashy offense they were efficient.
The Skins have struggled the last 2 weeks against mediocre defenses to put points on the board. It took them over 7 quarters before they found the endzone for the first time this year and they've been having a hard time finding it since. Hell, they had 2 weeks to prepare for Seattle and still couldn't figure out how to score on them. What was Gibbs doing the whole time? Playing bridge getting high on fiber?
13 out of 18 3rd down conversions, TOP of over 39 minutes, 141 rushing yards and 26 firstdowns...hardly call that mediocre. This team plays defense and controls the clock. I know you are giddy over all the points Philly has put up over KC and SF but big red is going to get #5 killed. If he keeps taken hits like he has over the first four games he wont make it to November.
Quote from: Sgt PSN on October 03, 2005, 08:43:04 PM
Quote from: archer on October 03, 2005, 08:21:41 PM
but teams like Baltimore and Carolina have recently had sucess with strong defenses and mediocre offenses.
There in lies the problem. The Skins still don't even have a mediocre offense! A mediocre offense would be a freaking improvement of epic proportions.
You do realize that during Carolina's one year of stardom that they had a very good offense as well. Not Colts good, but good none the less. They could pass and run the ball with consistancy. They had big play capability with Smith and Muhammed and a nice running game with Davis and Foster. The Skins could only dream of having an offense like that. And incase you forgot the Panthers offense absolutely shredded a dominating Patriots defense in the Super Bowl. Hell, even when the Ravens won the SB they had an offense that could move the chains. They weren't a flashy offense they were efficient.
The Skins have struggled the last 2 weeks against mediocre defenses to put points on the board. It took them over 7 quarters before they found the endzone for the first time this year and they've been having a hard time finding it since. Hell, they had 2 weeks to prepare for Seattle and still couldn't figure out how to score on them. What was Gibbs doing the whole time? Playing bridge getting high on fiber?
not that i disagree with you that our offense has lots of room to improve but i have to say the skins played a seahawk defense that through 3 games was number 1 on 3rd downs. They got slapped with skins converting 13 first downs and getting something like 130 yards on those 3rd downs. that was the number 1 3rd down defense
Quote from: Sgt PSN on October 03, 2005, 08:43:04 PM
Quote from: archer on October 03, 2005, 08:21:41 PM
but teams like Baltimore and Carolina have recently had sucess with strong defenses and mediocre offenses.
There in lies the problem. The Skins still don't even have a mediocre offense! A mediocre offense would be a freaking improvement of epic proportions.
You do realize that during Carolina's one year of stardom that they had a very good offense as well. Not Colts good, but good none the less. They could pass and run the ball with consistancy. They had big play capability with Smith and Muhammed and a nice running game with Davis and Foster. The Skins could only dream of having an offense like that. And incase you forgot the Panthers offense absolutely shredded a dominating Patriots defense in the Super Bowl. Hell, even when the Ravens won the SB they had an offense that could move the chains. They weren't a flashy offense they were efficient.
The Skins have struggled the last 2 weeks against mediocre defenses to put points on the board. It took them over 7 quarters before they found the endzone for the first time this year and they've been having a hard time finding it since. Hell, they had 2 weeks to prepare for Seattle and still couldn't figure out how to score on them. What was Gibbs doing the whole time? Playing bridge getting high on fiber?
We scored 20 points against the Hawks, the NFL average points scored per game is 19.74, I'd say we are atleast mediocre. You don't consider our running game as nice? We average 136 yds/game on the ground and the Iggles average 76 yards on the ground. What does that make the the Eagles running game, Pop Warner? We have more rushing yards than the Iggles and you have played 1 more game than us. Our average total offense is 340 yards per game, yours is 432. Again, I said our offense was mediocre, not great. I think 340 yards could be considered as average, you?
and to say that we didn't play good defenses. BEars cowboys and seahawks are all above average. the weakest i feel are the boys but no way the bears and seahawks are not above average
"Worst 3-0 team ever"
(http://joesong.atspace.com/comicbookguy.gif)
Skins blow.
Quote from: SD_Eagle on October 03, 2005, 09:10:41 PM
"Worst 3-0 team ever"
(http://joesong.atspace.com/comicbookguy.gif)
Skins blow.
rather be the worst 3-0 team than best 0-3 team
Quote from: SD_Eagle on October 03, 2005, 09:10:41 PM
"Worst 3-0 team ever"
(http://joesong.atspace.com/comicbookguy.gif)
Skins blow.
Ah, chief...ONLY 3-0 team :paranoid
Quote from: SD_Eagle on October 03, 2005, 09:10:41 PM
"Worst 3-0 team ever"
(http://joesong.atspace.com/comicbookguy.gif)
Skins blow.
How bout....Eagles...worst running game in the NFL...ouch
When the wind goes above 2 MPH, Brutal will start sucking.
I'm just glad that noodle-arm is playing well, it'll make it that much more difficult for Gibbs to pull him when he throws those 20-yard ducks come November and December. :-D
Quote from: archer on October 03, 2005, 09:16:09 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on October 03, 2005, 09:10:41 PM
"Worst 3-0 team ever"
(http://joesong.atspace.com/comicbookguy.gif)
Skins blow.
How bout....Eagles...worst running game in the NFL...ouch
Sorry, my bad, you're 25th
Quote from: archer on October 03, 2005, 09:19:42 PM
Quote from: archer on October 03, 2005, 09:16:09 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on October 03, 2005, 09:10:41 PM
"Worst 3-0 team ever"
(http://joesong.atspace.com/comicbookguy.gif)
Skins blow.
How bout....Eagles...worst running game in the NFL...ouch
Sorry, my bad, you're 25th
You are number 1 in passing though!!
I only claim we are mediocre, I don't think you could argue with that.
ahhahahahah taterskins SUCK!!!1111
Quote from: archer on October 03, 2005, 09:16:09 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on October 03, 2005, 09:10:41 PM
"Worst 3-0 team ever"
(http://joesong.atspace.com/comicbookguy.gif)
Skins blow.
How bout....Eagles...worst running game in the NFL...ouch
How 'bout the vaunted Joe Gibbs running attack gaining 3.9 ypc?
Or the fact that your team has ZERO rushing TDs?
But then again, TDs are a rare occurance in Washington. Right?
Eagles almost outscore your team in one game.
37 points for Eagles in 1 game
43 points for Washington in 4 games
Stop confusing the situation with facts. They're gooder than all, they is they is!
Give Gibbs credit...
he knows when to bench an overrated bum (http://washingtontimes.com/sports/20051004-120228-2603r.htm)
Quote from: PhillyGirl on October 04, 2005, 08:19:22 AM
Quote from: henchmanUK on October 04, 2005, 06:09:12 AM
Give Gibbs credit...
no
:-D but saying Au Revoir to LeVar would be the first good move the Skins have made in ages. They should have kept Pierce though. Linebackers that can tackle are always more valuable than linebackers that can't.
Simoneau 1
Portis 0
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on October 04, 2005, 12:42:08 AM
Quote from: archer on October 03, 2005, 09:16:09 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on October 03, 2005, 09:10:41 PM
"Worst 3-0 team ever"
(http://joesong.atspace.com/comicbookguy.gif)
Skins blow.
How bout....Eagles...worst running game in the NFL...ouch
How 'bout the vaunted Joe Gibbs running attack gaining 3.9 ypc?
Or the fact that your team has ZERO rushing TDs?
But then again, TDs are a rare occurance in Washington. Right?
Eagles almost outscore your team in one game.
37 points for Eagles in 1 game
43 points for Washington in 4 games
I would look at those suspect defenses you have played. The only decent defense Philly has played gave them their L.
QuoteUpdating previous reports, the Associated Press reports former Washington taterskins RB Timmy Smith, who set a Super Bowl rushing record in 1988, was formally charged Monday, Oct. 3, with intentionally possessing cocaine with intent to distribute, a charge that carries a lesser penalty than previously announced. A hearing was scheduled for Thursday, Oct. 6. The charges filed today didn't include conspiracy and carry a minimum five-year sentence, with a maximum of 40 years in prison and a fine of up to $2 million.
Arguing with Skins fans is maddening. Every year they believe that their team is good, no matter how much evidence there is to the contrary.
They won 9-7 against a terrible chicago team.
They won 14-13 against a team that dominated them for 45 minutes and then proceded to make no effort on offense in the fourth quarter. Parcells gave that game away by being stupid with his offense.
They won 20-17 in OT because the Seahawks' kicker missed not one, but two field goals.
Easily the worst 3-0 team that I can remember, but instead of seeing things through reasonable eyes, they feel the need to brag and boast.
Makes it all the funnier when their team inevitably falls apart.
16-0. Book it.
Quote from: rjs246 on October 04, 2005, 11:19:54 AM
Makes it all the funnier when their team inevitably falls apart.
and thats what makes it all worth while. ha.
Quote from: skin48 on October 04, 2005, 11:14:20 AM
I would look at those suspect defenses you have played. The only decent defense Philly has played gave them their L.
Meanwhile, the taterskins have put up gaudy numbers against mediocre defense.
Philly travels to Dallas this week. You think they'll hold the Birds to 14, or even 20?
Don't even compare your offense to ours. Seriously.
Yea because basically shutting the Chief offense down except for 1 drive (other 3 tds: shortfield, garbage time, kick return) is not a good performence.
Quote from: skin48 on October 04, 2005, 11:14:20 AM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on October 04, 2005, 12:42:08 AM
Quote from: archer on October 03, 2005, 09:16:09 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on October 03, 2005, 09:10:41 PM
"Worst 3-0 team ever"
(http://joesong.atspace.com/comicbookguy.gif)
Skins blow.
How bout....Eagles...worst running game in the NFL...ouch
How 'bout the vaunted Joe Gibbs running attack gaining 3.9 ypc?
Or the fact that your team has ZERO rushing TDs?
But then again, TDs are a rare occurance in Washington. Right?
Eagles almost outscore your team in one game.
37 points for Eagles in 1 game
43 points for Washington in 4 games
I would look at those suspect defenses you have played. The only decent defense Philly has played gave them their L.
Funny thing is that your offense struggles against zesty defenses.
Quote from: MDS on October 04, 2005, 01:50:05 PM
Yea because shutting the Chief basically shutting the Chief offense down except for 1 drive (other 3 tds: shortfield, garbage time, kick return) is not a good performence.
That is some good sentencing.
Quote from: rjs246 on October 04, 2005, 01:51:21 PM
Quote from: MDS on October 04, 2005, 01:50:05 PM
Yea because shutting the Chief basically shutting the Chief offense down except for 1 drive (other 3 tds: shortfield, garbage time, kick return) is not a good performence.
That is some good sentencing.
I aint got none excuses, me just a idiota
Quote from: rjs246 on October 04, 2005, 11:19:54 AM
Arguing with Skins fans is maddening. Every year they believe that their team is good, no matter how much evidence there is to the contrary.
They won 9-7 against a terrible chicago team.
They won 14-13 against a team that dominated them for 45 minutes and then proceded to make no effort on offense in the fourth quarter. Parcells gave that game away by being stupid with his offense.
They won 20-17 in OT because the Seahawks' kicker missed not one, but two field goals.
Easily the worst 3-0 team that I can remember, but instead of seeing things through reasonable eyes, they feel the need to brag and boast.
Makes it all the funnier when their team inevitably falls apart.
You are just like the media...all they want to do is say we havent beaten anyone but fail to point out the bucs and bengals 8 wins came against teams with a combined reccord of 6-22. We won the games. Chicago is not terrible...they will win the north. Seattle will also win their division.
You still haven't beaten the Eagles...and you won't. You'll get your wake up call eventually...twice!
Quote from: skin48 link=topic=16088.msg3
You are just like the media...all they want to do is say we havent beaten anyone but fail to point out the bucs and bengals 8 wins came against teams with a combined reccord of 6-22. We won the games. Chicago is not terrible...they will win the north. Seattle will also win their division.
The team that wins the North
isn't terrible? You're an idiot. This is laughable.
Chicago and Seattle are terrible. Washington barely beat them at home. So, they are one step above terrible: bad.
Quote from: skin48 on October 04, 2005, 02:06:58 PM
all they want to do is say we havent beaten anyone but fail to point out the bucs and bengals 8 wins came against teams with a combined reccord of 6-22.
Most people will call the Bucs a fluke too.
Quote from: MDS on October 04, 2005, 02:19:34 PM
Chicago and Seattle are terrible. Washington barely beat them at home. So, they are one step above terrible: bad.
A win is a win...last time I checked they werent giving you bonus wins for beating the niners by 39.
If you want to get technical, the players do get incentive bonuses.
Quote from: General_Failure on October 04, 2005, 05:52:59 PM
If you want to get technical, the players do get incentive bonuses.
i think he said wins
Couldn't be. I didn't read the word wins there, and my reading skills are good.
Quote from: General_Failure on October 04, 2005, 08:46:45 PM
Couldn't be. I didn't read the word wins there, and my reading skills are good.
its ok sometimes eagle fans only read the words they want to read
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 04, 2005, 08:51:25 PM
its ok sometimes eagle fans only they want to
Exactly. I'm glad you understand.
Quote from: skin48 on October 04, 2005, 02:06:58 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on October 04, 2005, 11:19:54 AM
Arguing with Skins fans is maddening. Every year they believe that their team is good, no matter how much evidence there is to the contrary.
They won 9-7 against a terrible chicago team.
They won 14-13 against a team that dominated them for 45 minutes and then proceded to make no effort on offense in the fourth quarter. Parcells gave that game away by being stupid with his offense.
They won 20-17 in OT because the Seahawks' kicker missed not one, but two field goals.
Easily the worst 3-0 team that I can remember, but instead of seeing things through reasonable eyes, they feel the need to brag and boast.
Makes it all the funnier when their team inevitably falls apart.
You are just like the media...all they want to do is say we havent beaten anyone but fail to point out the bucs and bengals 8 wins came against teams with a combined reccord of 6-22. We won the games. Chicago is not terrible...they will win the north. Seattle will also win their division.
Bears will win the North and Seattle will also take their division. Either thats a bold statement or just an attempt to justify your delirious thoughts of the foreskins being a good team.
Nothing says party like Michelob Ultra and Sprite.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v295/halter91/100_3129.jpg)
Boy that fan base just keeps getting cooler and cooler
Quote from: archer on October 03, 2005, 09:19:42 PM
Quote from: archer on October 03, 2005, 09:16:09 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on October 03, 2005, 09:10:41 PM
"Worst 3-0 team ever"
(http://joesong.atspace.com/comicbookguy.gif)
Skins blow.
How bout....Eagles...worst running game in the NFL...ouch
Sorry, my bad, you're 25th
when a team never actually runs the ball, and you're still better than 6 other teams in the NFL. thats pretty goddamn good.
the eagles have a way to beat the teams with great run defense. don't run.
Quote from: mussa on October 05, 2005, 12:59:52 AM
Quote from: skin48 on October 04, 2005, 02:06:58 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on October 04, 2005, 11:19:54 AM
Arguing with Skins fans is maddening. Every year they believe that their team is good, no matter how much evidence there is to the contrary.
They won 9-7 against a terrible chicago team.
They won 14-13 against a team that dominated them for 45 minutes and then proceded to make no effort on offense in the fourth quarter. Parcells gave that game away by being stupid with his offense.
They won 20-17 in OT because the Seahawks' kicker missed not one, but two field goals.
Easily the worst 3-0 team that I can remember, but instead of seeing things through reasonable eyes, they feel the need to brag and boast.
Makes it all the funnier when their team inevitably falls apart.
You are just like the media...all they want to do is say we havent beaten anyone but fail to point out the bucs and bengals 8 wins came against teams with a combined reccord of 6-22. We won the games. Chicago is not terrible...they will win the north. Seattle will also win their division.
Bears will win the North and Seattle will also take their division. Either thats a bold statement or just an attempt to justify your delirious thoughts of the foreskins being a good team.
The skins are a good team. The defense is outstanding. Only 3 teams have scored over 18 points in the last 19 games. The offense is improving. The offense was going to take a setback when Ramsey was replaced. Since Brunell has had a chance to get the rust off he is looking good. All those bounces that werent going the skins way are this year...like that INT at the end of the philly-skins game last year.
yea u have a defense, thats it.
Quote from: skin48 on October 05, 2005, 11:40:39 AM
The skins are a good team. The defense is outstanding. Only 3 teams have scored over 18 points in the last 19 games. The offense is improving. The offense was going to take a setback when Ramsey was replaced. Since Brunell has had a chance to get the rust off he is looking good. All those bounces that werent going the skins way are this year...like that INT at the end of the philly-skins game last year.
you mean breaks like getting the hapless Bears, Cowboys, and the Road Warriors that are the Seattle Seahawks for your first three games ?
Talk to me after the next two weeks.
Here's a gem I just ran across over on ES.... now, to some of their credits... they're calling the guy out on this.... some.
We play the kind of football... that will always result in a victory. Play flawlessly on offense and control the time of possession. When the other team is on the field, make sure they don't score points (Seattle doesn't count considering our decimated secondary when they were scoring). The exact same way it was done in the 80s. Honestly, no one in the NFL plays the way the Skins do. Everyone has these piss poor defenses and quick strike offenses. We play the game like it was meant to be played.
http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=118713
QuotePlay flawlessly on offense ...
Is that all it takes. :-D
The Skins play flawlessly on offense and struggle to put up 20.
If we played flawlessly on offense, we'd stick 60.
QuoteSkins play football that gives Fans hypertension, makes them nervous wrecks,
drink too much, and heart attacks.
:-D
Sorry, I'm still chuckling about Josh parry decking Shawn Springs :-D
Quote from: skin48 on October 05, 2005, 11:40:39 AM
Quote from: mussa on October 05, 2005, 12:59:52 AM
Quote from: skin48 on October 04, 2005, 02:06:58 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on October 04, 2005, 11:19:54 AM
Arguing with Skins fans is maddening. Every year they believe that their team is good, no matter how much evidence there is to the contrary.
They won 9-7 against a terrible chicago team.
They won 14-13 against a team that dominated them for 45 minutes and then proceded to make no effort on offense in the fourth quarter. Parcells gave that game away by being stupid with his offense.
They won 20-17 in OT because the Seahawks' kicker missed not one, but two field goals.
Easily the worst 3-0 team that I can remember, but instead of seeing things through reasonable eyes, they feel the need to brag and boast.
Makes it all the funnier when their team inevitably falls apart.
You are just like the media...all they want to do is say we havent beaten anyone but fail to point out the bucs and bengals 8 wins came against teams with a combined reccord of 6-22. We won the games. Chicago is not terrible...they will win the north. Seattle will also win their division.
Bears will win the North and Seattle will also take their division. Either thats a bold statement or just an attempt to justify your delirious thoughts of the foreskins being a good team.
The skins are a good team. The defense is outstanding. Only 3 teams have scored over 18 points in the last 19 games. The offense is improving. The offense was going to take a setback when Ramsey was replaced. Since Brunell has had a chance to get the rust off he is looking good. All those bounces that werent going the skins way are this year...like that INT at the end of the philly-skins game last year.
Name the three teams.
Quote from: FreakisaKearseWord on October 05, 2005, 02:47:32 PM
Sorry, I'm still chuckling about Josh parry decking Shawn Springs :-D
That's the only good thing Josh Parry will ever do in an Eagles uniform.
Quote from: Tomahawk on October 05, 2005, 07:32:42 PM
Quote from: skin48 on October 05, 2005, 11:40:39 AM
Quote from: mussa on October 05, 2005, 12:59:52 AM
Quote from: skin48 on October 04, 2005, 02:06:58 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on October 04, 2005, 11:19:54 AM
Arguing with Skins fans is maddening. Every year they believe that their team is good, no matter how much evidence there is to the contrary.
They won 9-7 against a terrible chicago team.
They won 14-13 against a team that dominated them for 45 minutes and then proceded to make no effort on offense in the fourth quarter. Parcells gave that game away by being stupid with his offense.
They won 20-17 in OT because the Seahawks' kicker missed not one, but two field goals.
Easily the worst 3-0 team that I can remember, but instead of seeing things through reasonable eyes, they feel the need to brag and boast.
Makes it all the funnier when their team inevitably falls apart.
You are just like the media...all they want to do is say we havent beaten anyone but fail to point out the bucs and bengals 8 wins came against teams with a combined reccord of 6-22. We won the games. Chicago is not terrible...they will win the north. Seattle will also win their division.
Bears will win the North and Seattle will also take their division. Either thats a bold statement or just an attempt to justify your delirious thoughts of the foreskins being a good team.
The skins are a good team. The defense is outstanding. Only 3 teams have scored over 18 points in the last 19 games. The offense is improving. The offense was going to take a setback when Ramsey was replaced. Since Brunell has had a chance to get the rust off he is looking good. All those bounces that werent going the skins way are this year...like that INT at the end of the philly-skins game last year.
Name the three teams.
Eagles 28, Packers 28, Cowboys 21
Quote from: skin48 on October 05, 2005, 08:19:20 PM
Quote from: Tomahawk on October 05, 2005, 07:32:42 PM
Quote from: skin48 on October 05, 2005, 11:40:39 AM
Quote from: mussa on October 05, 2005, 12:59:52 AM
Quote from: skin48 on October 04, 2005, 02:06:58 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on October 04, 2005, 11:19:54 AM
Arguing with Skins fans is maddening. Every year they believe that their team is good, no matter how much evidence there is to the contrary.
They won 9-7 against a terrible chicago team.
They won 14-13 against a team that dominated them for 45 minutes and then proceded to make no effort on offense in the fourth quarter. Parcells gave that game away by being stupid with his offense.
They won 20-17 in OT because the Seahawks' kicker missed not one, but two field goals.
Easily the worst 3-0 team that I can remember, but instead of seeing things through reasonable eyes, they feel the need to brag and boast.
Makes it all the funnier when their team inevitably falls apart.
You are just like the media...all they want to do is say we havent beaten anyone but fail to point out the bucs and bengals 8 wins came against teams with a combined reccord of 6-22. We won the games. Chicago is not terrible...they will win the north. Seattle will also win their division.
Bears will win the North and Seattle will also take their division. Either thats a bold statement or just an attempt to justify your delirious thoughts of the foreskins being a good team.
The skins are a good team. The defense is outstanding. Only 3 teams have scored over 18 points in the last 19 games. The offense is improving. The offense was going to take a setback when Ramsey was replaced. Since Brunell has had a chance to get the rust off he is looking good. All those bounces that werent going the skins way are this year...like that INT at the end of the philly-skins game last year.
Name the three teams.
Eagles 28, Packers 28, Cowboys 21
GO EAGLES!!
QuoteARRINGTON DONE IN D.C.
He's still on the roster, and he likely will be for the remainder of the season. But it's becoming more and more clear that linebacker LaVar Arrington's tenure with the taterskins will end after the 2005 season.
The root cause of the rift, we hear, is that Arrington doesn't get along with defensive coordinator Gregg Williams, who joined the 'Skins in 2004 after serving as head coach of the Bills for three seasons.
And the root of Arrington's fractured relationship with Williams, we're told, is that Arrington cannot properly assimilate into Williams' highly structured defensive system. Arrington no longer can freelance, and thus he no longer is effective.
Another reality at work in this case is that Arrington has a knee with little or no cartilage in it. He'll need something/anything to help avoid constant bone-on-bone grinding, and if he actually were playing it's likely that the pain and swelling from the friction in his knee would ultimately keep him out of action periodically while the thing heals up.
So with no future in D.C., the question becomes whether he'll land somewhere else. The Broncos and the Bucs are typically interested in sniffing around players with big names, but anyone interested in Arrington surely will take a long look at his knee.
Even if another team is interested, Arrington's agents royally screwed the pooch by making his $6.5 million roster bonus come due in July 2006. Listen up, agent types -- if your guy is getting a big-money roster bonus in any year of his contract, make the thing come due as early as possible in the league year. This will force the team to cut him early, allowing the player to hit the free agent market early, when some teams inevitably will overpay.
And the Postons had not one but two shots to alter the trigger for the roster bonus. Though they missed it when the deal was negotiated in December 2003, they could have adjusted the date of the roster bonus in connection with the "settlement" of Arrington's grievance regarding the alleged existence of a separate 2006 roster bonus in the amount of $6.5 million.
Arrington will, in the end, see neither of those payments, and the taterskins will be able to carry him on the roster deep into the 2006 offseason, making it even harder for him to get paid handsomely elsewhere.
Given the acrimony between Arrington and the organization over the past couple of years, our guess is that the team will take full advantage of its opportunity to stick it back to the guy who never was shy about sticking it to the team.
:-D :-D
Another one (draft pick) bites the dust in DC.
Funny thing is that Little Napoleon (Danny) signed him to a fat ass contract and when/if they cut him its going to be a HUGE cap hit.
Hahahahahahahah! I hope Arrington goes somewhere and becomes an All-Pro.
ReTard Arrington's dumb as a rock.
Look at him, he has to wear a farging wristband for the plays. :-D
(http://extremeskins.com/test/seattle/seattle%20384.jpg)
Quote from: Larry on October 05, 2005, 09:35:06 PM
ReTard Arrington's dumb as a rock.
Look at him, he has to wear a farging wristband for the plays. :-D
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week14vsPHI10_McNabbVsLitter.mpg
Bigskinbauer, this thread is to point and laugh at the taterskins; not McNabb. You're going to have to delete that post.
Quote from: Larry on October 05, 2005, 09:35:06 PM
ReTard Arrington's dumb as a rock.
Look at him, he has to wear a farging wristband for the plays. :-D
(http://extremeskins.com/test/seattle/seattle%20384.jpg)
He's not dumber than the battering ram of linebacker named Trotter, now he's dumb. He is good at plugging holes though, like the one in your rear. :o
And?
I never saw Trotter resort to a wristband playchart. ;D :-D
With my super Photoshop magnifying glass, I can see what's on it...
1) Put on left pant leg.
2) Put on right pant leg.
3) Put on socks than shoes. Note to self: not the other way around like last time.
4) Go home, complain, and count money.
Quote from: archer on October 05, 2005, 09:53:00 PM
He's not dumber than the battering ram of linebacker named Trotter, now he's dumb. He is good at plugging holes though, like the one in your rear. :o
What's really funny is that your retarded owner paid him to play for us last season and will most likely be doing the same with Arrington. :-D
Quote from: SD_Eagle on October 05, 2005, 10:09:23 PM
Quote from: archer on October 05, 2005, 09:53:00 PM
He's not dumber than the battering ram of linebacker named Trotter, now he's dumb. He is good at plugging holes though, like the one in your rear. :o
What's really funny is that your retarded owner paid him to play for us last season and will most likely be doing the same with Arrington. :-D
HA!
Quote from: SD_Eagle on October 05, 2005, 10:09:23 PM
Quote from: archer on October 05, 2005, 09:53:00 PM
He's not dumber than the battering ram of linebacker named Trotter, now he's dumb. He is good at plugging holes though, like the one in your rear. :o
What's really funny is that your retarded owner paid him to play for us last season and will most likely be doing the same with Arrington. :-D
taterskins 2005 dead cap money...
Laveraneus Coles $9.3m
Jeremiah Trotter $4.8m
Regan Upshaw $1.2m
Rod Gardner $1.1m
Total...$19.8m :-D :-D :-D
Quote from: Larry on October 05, 2005, 10:27:11 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on October 05, 2005, 10:09:23 PM
Quote from: archer on October 05, 2005, 09:53:00 PM
He's not dumber than the battering ram of linebacker named Trotter, now he's dumb. He is good at plugging holes though, like the one in your rear. :o
What's really funny is that your retarded owner paid him to play for us last season and will most likely be doing the same with Arrington. :-D
taterskins 2005 dead cap money...
Laveraneus Coles $9.3m
Jeremiah Trotter $4.8m
Regan Upshaw $1.2m
Rod Gardner $1.1m
Total...$19.8m :-D :-D :-D
:-D :-D :-D
Quote from: Larry on October 05, 2005, 10:00:36 PM
I never saw Trotter resort to a wristband playchart. ;D :-D
With my super Photoshop magnifying glass, I can see what's on it...
1) Put on left pant leg.
2) Put on right pant leg.
3) Put on socks than shoes. Note to self: not the other way around like last time.
4) Go home, complain, and count money.
Trotter doesn't need a playchart, they just say "plug hole here"....and he's great at it
Quote from: SD_Eagle on October 05, 2005, 10:31:31 PM
Quote from: Larry on October 05, 2005, 10:27:11 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on October 05, 2005, 10:09:23 PM
Quote from: archer on October 05, 2005, 09:53:00 PM
He's not dumber than the battering ram of linebacker named Trotter, now he's dumb. He is good at plugging holes though, like the one in your rear. :o
What's really funny is that your retarded owner paid him to play for us last season and will most likely be doing the same with Arrington. :-D
taterskins 2005 dead cap money...
Laveraneus Coles $9.3m
Jeremiah Trotter $4.8m
Regan Upshaw $1.2m
Rod Gardner $1.1m
Total...$19.8m :-D :-D :-D
:-D :-D :-D
What's really funny is the amount of room under the cap that the Eagles have and they still refuse to pay Westbrook....that is just as mind-boggling as giving Arrington a big contract and not playing him
Quote from: archer on October 05, 2005, 10:35:47 PM
What's really funny is the amount of room under the cap that the Eagles have and they still refuse to pay Westbrook....that is just as mind-boggling as giving Arrington a big contract and not playing him
The Eagles are just waiting for Snyder to offer to pay his salary too. And in return the Eagles will pick up the tab on James Thrash.
Quote from: archer on October 05, 2005, 10:33:11 PM
Quote from: Larry on October 05, 2005, 10:00:36 PM
I never saw Trotter resort to a wristband playchart. ;D :-D
With my super Photoshop magnifying glass, I can see what's on it...
1) Put on left pant leg.
2) Put on right pant leg.
3) Put on socks than shoes. Note to self: not the other way around like last time.
4) Go home, complain, and count money.
Trotter doesn't need a playchart, they just say "plug hole here"....and he's great at it
So wait. A coach can design a defense around a player's strengths? Get outta here.
Quote from: archer on October 05, 2005, 10:33:11 PM
Quote from: Larry on October 05, 2005, 10:00:36 PM
I never saw Trotter resort to a wristband playchart. ;D :-D
With my super Photoshop magnifying glass, I can see what's on it...
1) Put on left pant leg.
2) Put on right pant leg.
3) Put on socks than shoes. Note to self: not the other way around like last time.
4) Go home, complain, and count money.
Trotter doesn't need a playchart, they just say "plug hole here"....and he's great at it
Then how is it that your "defensive genius" couldn't get Trotter on some kind of track, while the Eagles' humble mad scientist figured out how to send Trotter to the Pro-Bowl TWICE? And now, between the DC, J. Gibbs, and Shorty Telemarketer, Arrington is about to join Trotter as an LB on a better team, being paid by the Deadskins.
I am loving the wit being displayed by archer and BigSkin in here...
Larry shows that Lavar is stupid enough to need a wristband for defensive plays (that is, unless they plan on using HIM at quarterback too.) and the Skins parrots chirp about Trotter being dumber.
Which is nothing but sour grapes because Napoleon sign Trot to a fat ass contract which he's still paying for and Trot sucked in DC.
So then the reply to Little Danny and the Accountants still having Trot on the books is a lame attempt at poking fun of the Eagles having too much cap room right now.
Hey you two geniuses...here's some facts...
1. The Birds have until November to use up this years cap space.
2. At the Eagle current level of $9-10M under the cap how does it feel knowing that your shtein ass team is only $1.6M under and yet your team is inferior to the Eagles? Must burn like that seven year itch you get from the hookers by the Anacostia, eh?
3. Even if they do not sign Westbrook using this years cap number they will have more than enough to do so in the off-season.
4. You have another year of facing the release of a player who will have a large impact on your salary cap (Mr. Arrington).
How's 3-0 feel? Good you say? Well have fun finishing off at 6-10 or 7-9.
Might as well add Arrington's salary to that dead money list as well. What did he get? Four snaps last week? That franchise is a farging joke.
lol at fargin deadskins fans. idiots :-D :-D :-D :-D :flipoff
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on October 06, 2005, 05:15:37 AM
I am loving the wit being displayed by archer and BigSkin in here...
Larry shows that Lavar is stupid enough to need a wristband for defensive plays (that is, unless they plan on using HIM at quarterback too.) and the Skins parrots chirp about Trotter being dumber.
Which is nothing but sour grapes because Napoleon sign Trot to a fat ass contract which he's still paying for and Trot sucked in DC.
So then the reply to Little Danny and the Accountants still having Trot on the books is a lame attempt at poking fun of the Eagles having too much cap room right now.
Hey you two geniuses...here's some facts...
1. The Birds have until November to use up this years cap space.
2. At the Eagle current level of $9-10M under the cap how does it feel knowing that your shtein ass team is only $1.6M under and yet your team is inferior to the Eagles? Must burn like that seven year itch you get from the hookers by the Anacostia, eh?
3. Even if they do not sign Westbrook using this years cap number they will have more than enough to do so in the off-season.
4. You have another year of facing the release of a player who will have a large impact on your salary cap (Mr. Arrington).
How's 3-0 feel? Good you say? Well have fun finishing off at 6-10 or 7-9.
when did i comment at all about lavar being traded in the past posts, all i showed was a clip of mcnabb running aroung trying to pick up a play chart. Yes QBs need it a lot more, but lavar hasn't played and doesn't know all of the plays. The only thing is that the skins as all of you know are unable to afford a huge cap hit next year, i am not the best at caps but Lavar is scheduled $10,542,000 next year and his cap penalty is $ 13,247,000 from my understanding. there is no farging way with the cap hell the skins are gonna be in next year that they can add another 3 million onto the cap and lose a good player. I honestly wish that lavar would agree to give back the penalty and be able to leave or be traded. I would be thrilled. The skins would love to have that 10 million dollar bench warmer off the team. I would too. But why the hell would lavar give back his contract???, i wouldn't if i were lavar and neither will he because Lavar isn't gonna get any more anywhere else. If he is desperate to play he will restructure so that it is possible for him to be traded or released next year. Lavar still can play but I don't see the need for someone that is getting payed nearly 11 million dollars expecially when the skins need cap relief for next year.
I don't understand why the hell you said anything to me about westbrook, when have I said anything about your cap or westbrook in the past few pages. I honestly don't remember if i said something long long ago but right now i have said nothing about that stuff and what ever the hell i had to say it couldn't be that bad because your cap is one of the best in the league.
Paragraphs.
For the love of God....PLEASE start using paragraphs.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on October 06, 2005, 05:21:58 PM
Paragraphs.
For the love of God....PLEASE start using paragraphs.
for the love of god stop putting farging words in my mouth. this is not the first time and it seems to always be you acussing me of saying stuff that i didn't. Even if i disagree with somethings being said I can handle most people on this board becuase they just don't farging say that i said something that i did not.
I for one think you not paying westbrook and TO is a good thing and i have said it before. you being a good team and paying good players will open the gates for everyone else.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 06, 2005, 05:28:39 PM
for the love of god stop putting farging words in my mouth. this is not the first time and it seems to always be you acussing me of saying stuff that i didn't. Even if i disagree with somethings being said I can handle most people on this board becuase they just don't farging say that i said something that i did not.
I for one think you not paying westbrook and TO is a good thing and i have said it before. you being a good team will open the gates for everyone else.
huh? lmfao!! What are you talking about? I just asked you to put your posts in some sort of readable fashion.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on October 06, 2005, 05:29:43 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 06, 2005, 05:28:39 PM
for the love of god stop putting farging words in my mouth. this is not the first time and it seems to always be you acussing me of saying stuff that i didn't. Even if i disagree with somethings being said I can handle most people on this board becuase they just don't farging say that i said something that i did not.
I for one think you not paying westbrook and TO is a good thing and i have said it before. you being a good team will open the gates for everyone else.
huh? lmfao!! What are you talking about? I just asked you to put your posts in some sort of readable fashion.
no i am reffering to your first post, grouping what archer said with me. I didn't say anything about westbrook or your cap
Quoting wrong is awesome.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 06, 2005, 05:30:56 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on October 06, 2005, 05:29:43 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 06, 2005, 05:28:39 PM
for the love of god stop putting farging words in my mouth. this is not the first time and it seems to always be you acussing me of saying stuff that i didn't. Even if i disagree with somethings being said I can handle most people on this board becuase they just don't farging say that i said something that i did not.
I for one think you not paying westbrook and TO is a good thing and i have said it before. you being a good team will open the gates for everyone else.
huh? lmfao!! What are you talking about? I just asked you to put your posts in some sort of readable fashion.
no i am reffering to your first post, grouping what archer said with me. I didn't say anything about westbrook or your cap
The original offending post was by the other bitch, PhillyPhreak.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 06, 2005, 05:20:17 PM
when did i comment at all about lavar being traded in the past posts, all i showed was a clip of mcnabb running aroung trying to pick up a play chart. Yes QBs need it a lot more, but lavar hasn't played and doesn't know all of the plays. The only thing is that the skins as all of you know are unable to afford a huge cap hit next year, i am not the best at caps but Lavar is scheduled $10,542,000 next year and his cap penalty is $ 13,247,000 from my understanding. there is no farging way with the cap hell the skins are gonna be in next year that they can add another 3 million onto the cap and lose a good player. I honestly wish that lavar would agree to give back the penalty and be able to leave or be traded. I would be thrilled. The skins would love to have that 10 million dollar bench warmer off the team. I would too. But why the hell would lavar give back his contract???, i wouldn't if i were lavar and neither will he because Lavar isn't gonna get any more anywhere else. If he is desperate to play he will restructure so that it is possible for him to be traded or released next year. Lavar still can play but I don't see the need for someone that is getting payed nearly 11 million dollars expecially when the skins need cap relief for next year.
I don't understand why the hell you said anything to me about westbrook, when have I said anything about your cap or westbrook in the past few pages. I honestly don't remember if i said something long long ago but right now i have said nothing about that stuff and what ever the hell i had to say it couldn't be that bad because your cap is one of the best in the league.
i didnt read this.
but i know it's just a load of shtein
QuoteYes QBs need it a lot more, but lavar hasn't played and doesn't know all of the plays.
You'd think with all that free time he had rehabbing his gimpy knee, he could've stopped counting his money just long enough to pick up the playbook and study it. :deion :-D
Quote from: Tomahawk on October 06, 2005, 06:13:45 PM
The original offending post was by the other bitch, PhillyPhreak.
Then i truly appoligize to phillygirl
but i don't think she took it that hard anyways
Quote from: Wingspan on October 06, 2005, 06:14:53 PM
i didnt read this.
but i know it's just a load of shtein
that is because you are acting ignorant
Quote from: Larry on October 06, 2005, 06:16:00 PM
QuoteYes QBs need it a lot more, but lavar hasn't played and doesn't know all of the plays.
You'd think with all that free time he had rehabbing his gimpy knee, he could've stopped counting his money just long enough to pick up the playbook and study it. :deion :-D
in all honesty i am not gonna disagree with you. I have a low tolerance level for lavar right now. He does seem to be holding in there in the media but he did say shtein after getting re-injured last year and saying no one cared about him, blaiming the coaches and all. Like i said if lavar would restructure so he could get out of here i couldn't be happier. It isn't that he is bad but with the cap the way it is no player is worth 10 million next year
Bla bla bla bla taterskins suck.
...Where'd Archer go? :paranoid
Quote from: FreakisaKearseWord on October 06, 2005, 07:06:10 PM
...Where'd Archer go? :paranoid
Up either Gibbs or Snyders ass depending on which day of the week it is.
Quote from: Tomahawk on October 06, 2005, 06:13:45 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 06, 2005, 05:30:56 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on October 06, 2005, 05:29:43 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 06, 2005, 05:28:39 PM
for the love of god stop putting farging words in my mouth. this is not the first time and it seems to always be you acussing me of saying stuff that i didn't. Even if i disagree with somethings being said I can handle most people on this board becuase they just don't farging say that i said something that i did not.
I for one think you not paying westbrook and TO is a good thing and i have said it before. you being a good team will open the gates for everyone else.
huh? lmfao!! What are you talking about? I just asked you to put your posts in some sort of readable fashion.
no i am reffering to your first post, grouping what archer said with me. I didn't say anything about westbrook or your cap
The original offending post was by the other bitch, PhillyPhreak.
:-D :flipoff
Fight me now!
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 06, 2005, 05:30:56 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on October 06, 2005, 05:29:43 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 06, 2005, 05:28:39 PM
for the love of god stop putting farging words in my mouth. this is not the first time and it seems to always be you acussing me of saying stuff that i didn't. Even if i disagree with somethings being said I can handle most people on this board becuase they just don't farging say that i said something that i did not.
I for one think you not paying westbrook and TO is a good thing and i have said it before. you being a good team will open the gates for everyone else.
huh? lmfao!! What are you talking about? I just asked you to put your posts in some sort of readable fashion.
no i am reffering to your first post, grouping what archer said with me. I didn't say anything about westbrook or your cap
So I was wrong to include you. It was your brothers archer and Jake then. Happy?
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on October 06, 2005, 09:35:56 PM
Quote from: Tomahawk on October 06, 2005, 06:13:45 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 06, 2005, 05:30:56 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on October 06, 2005, 05:29:43 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 06, 2005, 05:28:39 PM
for the love of god stop putting farging words in my mouth. this is not the first time and it seems to always be you acussing me of saying stuff that i didn't. Even if i disagree with somethings being said I can handle most people on this board becuase they just don't farging say that i said something that i did not.
I for one think you not paying westbrook and TO is a good thing and i have said it before. you being a good team will open the gates for everyone else.
huh? lmfao!! What are you talking about? I just asked you to put your posts in some sort of readable fashion.
no i am reffering to your first post, grouping what archer said with me. I didn't say anything about westbrook or your cap
The original offending post was by the other bitch, PhillyPhreak.
:-D :flipoff
Fight me now!
Your mama know you talk like that, oh yeah, she taught you
Hells yeah his moms taught him, she's a good fighter. Straight punches, broken noses, and stolen wallets.
Quote from: FreakisaKearseWord on October 06, 2005, 07:06:10 PM
...Where'd Archer go? :paranoid
hello everyone,
i don't like where this thread is going. i maybe be guilty of insighting some abbrassive commentary and I appologize, let's try and keep it to x's and o's
taterskins suck.
Quote from: MDS on October 06, 2005, 10:08:03 PM
taterskins suck.
now, that's what I'm looking for
gibbs is old and stupid, too.
Quote from: MDS on October 06, 2005, 10:23:08 PM
gibbs is old and stupid, too.
too funny, it's not working, you're not dragging me into a verbal battle, I am above that
u r reley da mature 1
Quote from: MDS on October 06, 2005, 10:33:57 PM
u r reley da mature 1
MDS a.k.a. T.O.?
"I DN'T ENVISION MYSELF LEAVING, BUT I CN'T STAY WHERE I'M NT WANTED AFTER ALL THESE REPORTS R COMIN OUT DAILY!" - TO
Quote from: archer on October 06, 2005, 10:04:30 PM
let's try and keep it to pointing and laughing
Corrected.
(http://img367.imageshack.us/img367/7599/corel0040qf.jpg)
What the hell is that? Kill it before it goes on a rampage.
(http://www.horrormagazine.it/imgbank/NEWS/fly.jpg)
I think those glasses belong to Chris Samuel's fat head.
Thats what Chris Rock felt like in the movie Friday.
Quote from: shorebird on October 08, 2005, 01:11:43 AM
Thats what Chris Rock Tucker felt like in the movie Friday.
;)
Quote from: Sgt PSN on October 08, 2005, 01:28:23 AM
Quote from: shorebird on October 08, 2005, 01:11:43 AM
Thats what Chris Rock Tucker felt like in the movie Friday.
;)
DAMN!! I constantly get those two names mixed up.
Quote from: shorebird on October 08, 2005, 11:19:35 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on October 08, 2005, 01:28:23 AM
Quote from: shorebird on October 08, 2005, 01:11:43 AM
Thats what Chris Rock Tucker felt like in the movie Friday.
;)
DAMN!! I constantly get those two names mixed up.
You, too, I used to get them mixed up alot, thought I was the only one. Somehow I've now mastered the Rock/Tucker mix-up
Quote from: FreakisaKearseWord on October 08, 2005, 11:44:05 PM
Quote from: shorebird on October 08, 2005, 11:19:35 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on October 08, 2005, 01:28:23 AM
Quote from: shorebird on October 08, 2005, 01:11:43 AM
Thats what Chris Rock Tucker felt like in the movie Friday.
;)
DAMN!! I constantly get those two names mixed up.
You, too, I used to get them mixed up alot, thought I was the only one. Somehow I've now mastered the Rock/Tucker mix-up
Did the same thing with Steve Blake, PG for Terps b-ball team, and Jeff Blake, when he was here.
But back to the taterskins, is there anybody who thinks they have a chance against the Broncos?? Not me. The dream ends today the the Skins.
Actually, I do think that they have a *chance* against the Broncs. Denver was pretty anemic at the beginning of the season what with losing to Miami and all. If they play like that or like they did for most of the first half against SD for that matter then they could very well lose to the Skins. Not that I see a Denver loss as likely, mind you, but it definitely isn't a gimme game like, say, our game with Dallas. ;)
I'll be happy if the skins come out and win one of the next two because that is almost 2 of the next 3 because we play the 9ers after the donkeys and the cheifs. That puts the skins at 5-1 going into two division games and at worst will be 5-3 at midpoint
Quote from: Larry on October 03, 2005, 09:19:34 PM
When the wind goes above 2 MPH, Brutal will start sucking.
I'm just glad that noodle-arm is playing well, it'll make it that much more difficult for Gibbs to pull him when he throws those 20-yard ducks come November and December. :-D
Yeah, he only threw for 322 and 2 TDs in heavy rain. No big deal.
Quote from: twatson on October 10, 2005, 12:23:50 AM
Quote from: Larry on October 03, 2005, 09:19:34 PM
When the wind goes above 2 MPH, Brutal will start sucking.
I'm just glad that noodle-arm is playing well, it'll make it that much more difficult for Gibbs to pull him when he throws those 20-yard ducks come November and December. :-D
Yeah, he only threw for 322 and 2 TDs in heavy rain. No big deal.
:)
Quote from: FFatPatt on October 04, 2005, 01:43:40 PM
Quote from: skin48 on October 04, 2005, 11:14:20 AM
I would look at those suspect defenses you have played. The only decent defense Philly has played gave them their L.
Meanwhile, the taterskins have put up gaudy numbers against mediocre defense.
Philly travels to Dallas this week. You think they'll hold the Birds to 14, or even 20?
Don't even compare your offense to ours. Seriously.
Hmm, I think they held you to 10 (3 actually, your D got the other 7).
Also, don't feel bad that your awesome high-powered offense had 30 LESS yards and scored two less TDs than Santana Moss did by himself against the same team. I'm sure your offense is really good!
Quote from: Wingspan on October 05, 2005, 10:51:44 AM
Quote from: archer on October 03, 2005, 09:19:42 PM
Quote from: archer on October 03, 2005, 09:16:09 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on October 03, 2005, 09:10:41 PM
"Worst 3-0 team ever"
(http://joesong.atspace.com/comicbookguy.gif)
Skins blow.
How bout....Eagles...worst running game in the NFL...ouch
Sorry, my bad, you're 25th
when a team never actually runs the ball, and you're still better than 6 other teams in the NFL. thats pretty goddamn good.
the eagles have a way to beat the teams with great run defense. don't run.
:-D :-D Since when was giving up 167 great run D?! That's 38 more yds than your entire offense gained! :-D :-D
Quote from: twatson on October 10, 2005, 12:30:17 AM
Quote from: FFatPatt on October 04, 2005, 01:43:40 PM
Quote from: skin48 on October 04, 2005, 11:14:20 AM
I would look at those suspect defenses you have played. The only decent defense Philly has played gave them their L.
Meanwhile, the taterskins have put up gaudy numbers against mediocre defense.
Philly travels to Dallas this week. You think they'll hold the Birds to 14, or even 20?
Don't even compare your offense to ours. Seriously.
Hmm, I think they held you to 10 (3 actually, your D got the other 7).
Also, don't feel bad that your awesome high-powered offense had 30 LESS yards and scored two less TDs than Santana Moss did by himself against the same team. I'm sure your offense is really good!
now you are rubbing it in. today we did get 447 yardss though. This is the first real defense that the iggles have played and they critize us for not having played a good d. we have played some of the roughest Ds around this year. Next week we get a break
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 10, 2005, 12:53:49 AM
Quote from: twatson on October 10, 2005, 12:30:17 AM
Quote from: FFatPatt on October 04, 2005, 01:43:40 PM
Quote from: skin48 on October 04, 2005, 11:14:20 AM
I would look at those suspect defenses you have played. The only decent defense Philly has played gave them their L.
Meanwhile, the taterskins have put up gaudy numbers against mediocre defense.
Philly travels to Dallas this week. You think they'll hold the Birds to 14, or even 20?
Don't even compare your offense to ours. Seriously.
Hmm, I think they held you to 10 (3 actually, your D got the other 7).
Also, don't feel bad that your awesome high-powered offense had 30 LESS yards and scored two less TDs than Santana Moss did by himself against the same team. I'm sure your offense is really good!
now you are rubbing it in. today we did get 447 yardss though. This is the first real defense that the iggles have played and they critize us for not having played a good d. we have played some of the roughest Ds around this year. Next week we get a break
We have played the number 4, 6, 13, and 24 Ds. You've played the 13th,
24th, 27th, 28th, and 32nd ranked Ds in the league! Of course after today's performance the Dallas D will be ranked much higher than 24th next week though.
League rankings are very important at this time of the season. Yessirree, they tell the whole story.
see you guys are more homerish than we are. That is rediculous to say that you have played better defenses than us, it isn't exactly your fault, it is just the schedule but to say that our team has played easy defenses is ignorant
Brunell threw 53 times in the rain! Gibbs sucks! He's too pass happy!
And your defense is still playing well. I have to wonder if the lack of turnovers created and sacks is going to catch up with you soon.
What do you have? 4 sacks?
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on October 10, 2005, 01:45:12 PM
Brunell threw 53 times in the rain! Gibbs sucks! He's too pass happy!
Pass happy offenses are teh suck. Ha!
us and dallas are the only two teams that rank in the top ten in offense and defense. You fall at a cool number 20 in the defensive catagory. taterskins are best offensive/defensive combination, 8th offense and 5th defense.
Wins are all that matter and you are worse than the skins in that catagory too.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 10, 2005, 03:39:22 PM
us and dallas are the only two teams that rank in the top ten in offense and defense. You fall at a cool number 20 in the defensive catagory. taterskins are best offensive/defensive combination, 8th offense and 5th defense.
Wins are all that matters and you are worse than the skins in that catagory too.
:-D :-D :-D Just telling it like it is.
stats mean so much
you improved dallas's defense from number 24 to number 10 with your sucky offensive preformance
Stats are for losers and Skins fans
And really important during the first half of the season, like when one very impressive (or sickening, depending on how you want to look at it) performance can throw the whole thing out of whack.
so in your opinion you have played better defenses??
No, we've played zesty on offense. Just another slow start for a Reid offense.
Quote from: SD_Eagle on October 10, 2005, 09:16:47 PM
Stats are for losers and Skins fans
What's the difference?
not all losers are skins fans, all skins fans are losers
My above comment works on so many levels.
Quote from: MDS on October 10, 2005, 11:18:06 PM
not all losers are skins fans, all skins fans are losers
Too bad you feel that way, you must have had a rough life, I feel sorry for you
Quote from: archer on October 11, 2005, 09:50:01 PM
Quote from: MDS on October 10, 2005, 11:18:06 PM
not all losers are skins fans, all skins fans are losers
Too bad you feel that way, you must have had a rough life, I feel sorry for you
Go hump a tree, hippy.
ah, now dead tree crew makes perfect sense, they're tree humpers
Quote from: T_Section224 on October 12, 2005, 11:59:27 AM
ah, now dead tree crew makes perfect sense, they're tree humpers
I need me one of those AV's. I'll get to work later. I can't decide between the Da Maya, Director of Security, The Prez or the homosexual clown.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 10, 2005, 03:39:22 PM
Wins are all that matter and you are worse than the skins in that catagory too.
huh ? The Skins 3 wins are somehow better than the Eagles 3 wins ? :sly
Quote from: terpseagles on October 12, 2005, 12:43:54 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 10, 2005, 03:39:22 PM
Wins are all that matter and you are worse than the skins in that catagory too.
huh ? The Skins 3 wins are somehow better than the Eagles 3 wins ? :sly
(http://www.acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/scratch.gif)You must have a hell of a time with boxscores
Quote from: MDS on October 10, 2005, 11:18:06 PM
not all losers are skins fans, all skins fans are losers
Isn't that an excerpt from one of the questions on an SAT test or the wonderlic or something?
i dont no, but its the truth. name me one skins fans who is not a loser. and dont say art, because hes super cool and doesnt count.
Quote from: MDS on October 12, 2005, 03:17:54 PM
i dont no, but its the truth. name me one skins fans who is not a loser. and dont say art, because hes super cool and doesnt count.
rjs
Quote from: Tomahawk on October 12, 2005, 03:25:30 PM
Quote from: MDS on October 12, 2005, 03:17:54 PM
i dont no, but its the truth. name me one skins fans who is not a loser. and dont say art, because hes super cool and doesnt count.
rjs
I'd much rather be a loser than a skins fan. Assface.
Quote from: rjs246 on October 12, 2005, 03:28:27 PM
Quote from: Tomahawk on October 12, 2005, 03:25:30 PM
Quote from: MDS on October 12, 2005, 03:17:54 PM
i dont no, but its the truth. name me one skins fans who is not a loser. and dont say art, because hes super cool and doesnt count.
rjs
I'd much rather be a loser than a skins fan. Assface.
That's right-you're not a SkinsFan; you're a SkinsLover.
U luv u sum animal porn.
Quote from: qwert246 on October 12, 2005, 02:50:29 PM
Quote from: terpseagles on October 12, 2005, 12:43:54 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 10, 2005, 03:39:22 PM
Wins are all that matter and you are worse than the skins in that catagory too.
huh ? The Skins 3 wins are somehow better than the Eagles 3 wins ? :sly
(http://www.acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/scratch.gif)You must have a hell of a time with boxscores
not as much trouble as apparently you do w/ reading comprehension. See, had the guy said that the Skins were better in the "Win -
LOSS column, well... he would have been correct. Or had he said that the Eagles were worse off than the Skins in the
LOSS catagory, again, he would have been correct. However he said none of those things. No, he said that "Wins" were all that mattered.... now, perhaps you could help me out here Mr. Smart taterskin fan .... how many wins to the Skins have ? And how many do the Eagles have ?
What were you saying again, my short attention span has forgotten.
I got reply # 1000.
I'm teh coolest.....
Quote from: terpseagles on October 12, 2005, 03:34:29 PM
Quote from: qwert246 on October 12, 2005, 02:50:29 PM
Quote from: terpseagles on October 12, 2005, 12:43:54 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 10, 2005, 03:39:22 PM
Wins are all that matter and you are worse than the skins in that catagory too.
huh ? The Skins 3 wins are somehow better than the Eagles 3 wins ? :sly
(http://www.acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/scratch.gif)You must have a hell of a time with boxscores
not as much trouble as apparently you do w/ reading comprehension. See, had the guy said that the Skins were better in the "Win - LOSS column, well... he would have been correct. Or had he said that the Eagles were worse off than the Skins in the LOSS catagory, again, he would have been correct. However he said none of those things. No, he said that "Wins" were all that mattered.... now, perhaps you could help me out here Mr. Smart taterskin fan .... how many wins to the Skins have ? And how many do the Eagles have ?
What were you saying again, my short attention span has forgotten.
I guess your short attention span doesn't understand sarcasm. farging assclown
Quote from: qwert246 on October 12, 2005, 03:53:04 PM
Quote from: terpseagles on October 12, 2005, 03:34:29 PM
Quote from: qwert246 on October 12, 2005, 02:50:29 PM
Quote from: terpseagles on October 12, 2005, 12:43:54 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 10, 2005, 03:39:22 PM
Wins are all that matter and you are worse than the skins in that catagory too.
huh ? The Skins 3 wins are somehow better than the Eagles 3 wins ? :sly
(http://www.acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/scratch.gif)You must have a hell of a time with boxscores
not as much trouble as apparently you do w/ reading comprehension. See, had the guy said that the Skins were better in the "Win - LOSS column, well... he would have been correct. Or had he said that the Eagles were worse off than the Skins in the LOSS catagory, again, he would have been correct. However he said none of those things. No, he said that "Wins" were all that mattered.... now, perhaps you could help me out here Mr. Smart taterskin fan .... how many wins to the Skins have ? And how many do the Eagles have ?
What were you saying again, my short attention span has forgotten.
I guess your short attention span doesn't understand sarcasm. farging assclown
sure I do. Watch.
[straightface]
The taterskins are good and a quality run organization.
[/sarcasm]
[I am] impressed by your understanding of [/brackets] You do that gooder than anybody.
you're damn skippy I do. The sarcasm was on from an earlier post... and the straightface, well, that's still on. Not for long I'm sure... the people over at extremehomers are on fire today...
you guys are bigger homers than skin fans, you have 2 loses and think you aren't gonna lose anymore all season. 13-14 wins is probable to eagle fans and you think you are gonna win the superbowl. Give me a break, half of us think that the skins will win 9 games and we are the homers, the dumbass taterskins who have predicted superbowls are stupid and i'll be the first to say it. Also extremeskins isn't the best skins fansite to go to if you really are looking for educated fans.
we find extremequeers funny. thats we always look at it and quote some posts from it. if we want fair and object posts, ill go to that 49ers message board where after they beat the rams, they thought it was destiny.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 12, 2005, 04:47:24 PM
you guys are bigger homers than skin fans, you have 2 loses and think you aren't gonna lose anymore all season. 13-14 wins is probable to eagle fans and you think you are gonna win the superbowl. Give me a break, half of us think that the skins will win 9 games and we are the homers, the dumbass taterskins who have predicted superbowls are stupid and i'll be the first to say it. Also extremeskins isn't the best skins fansite to go to if you really are looking for educated fans.
Who are the space cadets that think the Eagles will win 13 games? Man...this team is no better than 11...12 with a miracle.
Quote from: rjs246 on October 12, 2005, 08:40:18 AM
Quote from: archer on October 11, 2005, 09:50:01 PM
Quote from: MDS on October 10, 2005, 11:18:06 PM
not all losers are skins fans, all skins fans are losers
Too bad you feel that way, you must have had a rough life, I feel sorry for you
Go hump a tree, hippy.
my name is archer, which means I kill animals with a bow and arrow, you know...hunting, I'm not a tree humping hippy, though I see nothing wrong with that ;D
Quote from: terpseagles on October 12, 2005, 04:22:02 PM
Quote from: qwert246 on October 12, 2005, 03:53:04 PM
Quote from: terpseagles on October 12, 2005, 03:34:29 PM
Quote from: qwert246 on October 12, 2005, 02:50:29 PM
Quote from: terpseagles on October 12, 2005, 12:43:54 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 10, 2005, 03:39:22 PM
Wins are all that matter and you are worse than the skins in that catagory too.
huh ? The Skins 3 wins are somehow better than the Eagles 3 wins ? :sly
(http://www.acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/scratch.gif)You must have a hell of a time with boxscores
not as much trouble as apparently you do w/ reading comprehension. See, had the guy said that the Skins were better in the "Win - LOSS column, well... he would have been correct. Or had he said that the Eagles were worse off than the Skins in the LOSS catagory, again, he would have been correct. However he said none of those things. No, he said that "Wins" were all that mattered.... now, perhaps you could help me out here Mr. Smart taterskin fan .... how many wins to the Skins have ? And how many do the Eagles have ?
What were you saying again, my short attention span has forgotten.
I guess your short attention span doesn't understand sarcasm. farging assclown
sure I do. Watch.
[straightface]
The taterskins are good and a quality run organization.
[/sarcasm]
it doesn't bother eagles fans a little bit that your organization is 12 mil under the cap and your special teams stinks (could have kept Reese with that money), your defense has holes (letting simon for nothing go was a horrible move, not that he was the greatest, just gave you more guys to platoon), you leave your qb in way to long during the dallas game further risking injury (mcnabb should be rehabing from surgery right now), "neckbeard" should have been in for the start of the second half, you didn't activate another kicker for the raiders game, causing akers to further injure his leg and cause him to be out even longer, maybe the whole season. all dumb a$$ moves not typical of a "quality run organization"
the eagles are far from perfect, they've come in to all but 1 game this year extremely underprepared. don't throw stones, this isn't the eagles team of recent memory, it's about to get a whole lot worse, starting with the qb situation
Quote from: archer on October 12, 2005, 10:52:15 PM
it doesn't bother eagles fans a little bit that your organization is 12 mil under the cap
Not when you consider the alternative......
taterskins offseason spending sprees have included the likes of Bruce Smith, Deion Sanders, Lavern Coles, Chad Morton, Trotter, Portis and Smoot which all added up to a great team on paper that didn't even leave enough room under the cap to sign a quality towel boy. Millions of dollars spent and in return the Skins got a bunch of really good draft picks that they had traded away in some of the above named aquisitions. No division titles, no playoff appearances and barely even getting a sniff at .500.
Yeah. Spending works.
Quote from: archer on October 12, 2005, 10:52:15 PM
blah blah blah blah words words words words yadda yadda yadda yadda etcetery etcetery etcetery etcetery wah wah wah wah wah wah words words words words yadda yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah "neckbeard" should have been in for the start of the second half wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah more words more words more words more words yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda
Hail Neckbeard! 8)
It would possibly bother me if we were, say... in late November or December. See, some of you Skins fans either just ignore, or simply can't comprehend that the deadline for extensions/signings to count against this years cap is not here yet. I swear that's all I hear from you people. Come talk to me late next month and we'll discuss the Eagles cap situation. If, at that time, they are still sitting on a pile of cash and haven't addressed some of the extensions I expect them to, then perhaps my attitude will be different.
As for player management... would I have liked McNabb to be pulled quicker, sure... but hey, no harm no foul... you can't plan for injury. You say Neckbeard (Hail Neckbeard) should have started the second half.... Why ? Seriously, why ? The Eagles were down the week before and came out and scored 24 second half points. Correct or no ? They were down by 24 at the half against the cowboys.... so why should Detmer have started ?
Speaking of player management, how is Lavar doing these days ? He's one of the highest paid defensive players in the league, no ? Now I live in Gaithersburg these days and I see all the Gibbs interviews w/ George Michael and the lot. Boy Gibbs don't look happy..... Lavar either. Is Danny sending him a flat screen ?
About cap management.... what do the Skins have in dead $$ this year ? Over 19 Million ? Hell, I think Trotter is costing your team double what he's costing the Eagles this year. How does it feel to watch your team pay for our ProBowl LB whos is actually playing AND pay for your ProBowl LB to sit on the bench. That there is some fine cap management. The Eagles should follow that model, right, because it's brought so much success to the organization.
(insert taterskin fan retort here: "oh yeah, well were #1 in the standings" )
No answer archer ? Huh, you Skins fans have more in common w/ the Extremehomers than you think.....
I just think it's unfair that the NFL refuses to award the taterskins a playoff berth by the merit of their 3-1 start.
Quote from: archer on October 12, 2005, 10:52:15 PM
all dumb a$$ moves not typical of a "quality run organization"
People are human, archer. Consistently, under the watch of Lurie and Snyder, which would you say was the "quality run organisation"?
Quote from: FFatPatt on October 14, 2005, 09:29:08 AM
I just think it's unfair that the NFL refuses to award the taterskins a playoff berth by the merit of their 3-1 start.
those sons of bitches
Quote from: terpseagles on October 14, 2005, 08:59:17 AM
No answer archer ? Huh, you Skins fans have more in common w/ the Extremehomers than you think.....
so do you, damn over 650 posts over there, i got over 100 here and that is a hell of a lot but to post 650 times at ES is just crazy
I'd like to be the first to welcome you to 3-2 :)
They are like Temple Basketball last year. Look like they might be okay, but just cant win against good teams.
Extreme doing what they do best...
Crying about the refs. :-D
There is a definate bias against the Skins. With talent like they have, it has to be a conspiracy as to why they dont win every game 2332-0
Could it be that the mighty, mighty taterskins have fallen back to the level of the lowly Eagles? :-D
Incontheivable!
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on October 16, 2005, 04:43:19 PM
Extreme doing what they do best...
Crying about the refs. :-D
I haven't been over there but I'm going to guess they're bitching and complaining about the spot the refs gave Priest Holmes on a 4th and 1 late in the game.
(http://www.taterskins.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/FMGMHGDOPFCB/55838871PG.jpg)
10 catches. 172 yards. 2 TDs.
He is averaging 125 per game
This man doesn't deserve to be on a zesty 3-2 team that is tied in last in their division.
Moss had a hell of a game today. I'd say it was just because he was going up against a zesty Chiefs defense but he out performed TO against the same defense. I don't think too many people would argue that Moss might be the biggest surprise in the league so far this year. He's been outstanding for the Skins......a lot better than I thought he'd be.
But the Skins still suck. :)
TO = double/triple teamed.
Moss? Not so much.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 16, 2005, 05:54:04 PM
10 catches. 172 yards. 2 TDs.
He is averaging 125 per game
This man doesn't deserve to be on a zesty 3-2 team that is tied in last in their division.
No... but the rest of his overachieving team does.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on October 16, 2005, 05:56:59 PM
TO = double/triple teamed.
Moss? Not so much.
Against the Chiefs? No he wasn't. TO saw a lot of single coverage during that game because the Chiefs were so determined to stop Westbrook. TO was wide open all day.
Now if you're talking about in general, then yes. TO sees a lot more double teams than Moss does. But if Moss keeps going at his current rate, he'll start seeing those types of coverages as well. The question is, will he still be productive when facing said coverage?
Quote from: Sgt PSN on October 16, 2005, 06:35:13 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on October 16, 2005, 05:56:59 PM
TO = double/triple teamed.
Moss? Not so much.
Against the Chiefs? No he wasn't. TO saw a lot of single coverage during that game because the Chiefs were so determined to stop Westbrook. TO was wide open all day.
Now if you're talking about in general, then yes. TO sees a lot more double teams than Moss does. But if Moss keeps going at his current rate, he'll start seeing those types of coverages as well. The question is, will he still be productive when facing said coverage?
I meant in general.
Santana is obviously the second coming of Art Monk. Jeez.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on October 16, 2005, 06:36:54 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on October 16, 2005, 06:35:13 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on October 16, 2005, 05:56:59 PM
TO = double/triple teamed.
Moss? Not so much.
Against the Chiefs? No he wasn't. TO saw a lot of single coverage during that game because the Chiefs were so determined to stop Westbrook. TO was wide open all day.
Now if you're talking about in general, then yes. TO sees a lot more double teams than Moss does. But if Moss keeps going at his current rate, he'll start seeing those types of coverages as well. The question is, will he still be productive when facing said coverage?
I meant in general.
I kind of figured that but wasn't sure. Regardless, I agree with what you're saying then. :)
I would definatly say T.O is better than moss so don't get your panties in a bunch. Now i do feel that Moss is a very good receiver and moss and TO will both go to the pro bowl.
But then again moss is on pace for 2020 yards 13 TDs, 106 receptions and a 19.1 average per catch. Those numbers are unheard of.
It's week 6. And who cares about the pro bowl.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 16, 2005, 06:57:57 PM
But then again moss is on pace for 2020 yards 13 TDs, 106 receptions and a 19.1 average per catch. Those numbers are unheard of.
Holy crap, 13 TDs? Thats almost 1 a game. Might as well put him in the HOF now.
Skins overall played well in KC today. They're much better than I thought they would be.
NFC East is doing well. They should revoke the NFC North's automatic playoff bid.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 16, 2005, 06:57:57 PM
But then again moss is on pace for 2020 yards 13 TDs, 106 receptions and a 19.1 average per catch. Those numbers are unheard of.
Ever play Madden? ;)
Quote from: FFatPatt on October 16, 2005, 08:15:23 PM
Skins overall played well in KC today. They're much better than I thought they would be.
NFC East is doing well. They should revoke the NFC North's automatic playoff bid.
Seriously. The NFC North is going to be the NFL's version of the NL West........only alot more suckier.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 16, 2005, 06:57:57 PM
I would definatly say T.O is better than moss so don't get your panties in a bunch. Now i do feel that Moss is a very good receiver and moss and TO will both go to the pro bowl.
But then again moss is on pace for 2020 yards 13 TDs, 106 receptions and a 19.1 average per catch. Those numbers are unheard of.
TO will finish with much better numbers than Moss. 100% guaranteed. My guarantees never fail.
But, but, but... the Skins should have won!
Wah!
:-D
It was rather enjoyable seeing the overrated and overpaid Chris Samuels make Jared Allen look like Derrick Thomas. ;D
Quote from: FFatPatt on October 16, 2005, 08:15:23 PM
Skins overall played well in KC today. They're much better than I thought they would be.
NFC East is doing well. They should revoke the NFC North's automatic playoff bid.
i think the skins played a hell of a lot better against the broncos, this was crazy with all those damn fumbles, i don't know how the chiefs have 18 forced fumbles this year.
Otherwise people were mad about officiating last week, i wasn't too upset last week but this week i am alittle more. This week, to be fair the officials weren't calling shtein, they let the teams play. THe only thing is the chiefs were constantly committing penalties, a lot of holding but that is usually ignored but the offsides were not called.
Overall the skins played damn near horrible in my opinion today, i mean they get yards and don't give up yards(5th on Defense and 7th on offense) which has been consistant this year but they are committing turnovers which is just unacceptable/
you forgot the fact that the Skins have no good players. that's also why they didn't look good today.
Art went to the game, kept a blog and has gotten very cocky
It hurts to lose, wah wah wah (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=120847)
Quote from: MDS on October 16, 2005, 08:55:36 PM
Art went to the game, kept a blog and has gotten very cocky
It hurts to lose, wah wah wah (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=120847)
Hello Art. Welcome to Loserville. Population: You.
Quote-- Saturday, Oct. 15, 11 a.m. -- IHOP with the family. A Chiefs fan -- a woman -- has the nerve to say, "Boo taterskins," to me. Obviously she has no idea who I am. I'm the guy much bigger than her.
:-D :-D :-D
I spit chips and salsa out of my mouth after reading this :-D
Can I have permission to punch this guy if I ever see him?
Please? I'll bring a stool.
You won't need it, he's probably shorter than you.
Quote from: General_Failure on October 16, 2005, 09:45:46 PM
You won't need it, he's probably shorter than you.
I could see that. Snyder...Art...Napoleon...
Female.
They're male.
BIG difference.
Short chicks are cool. Short, arrogant, imbecilic men are not.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on October 16, 2005, 09:44:17 PM
Can I have permission to punch this guy if I ever see him?
Please? I'll bring a stool.
You don't know who you're dealing with :-D
Maybe MURP can punch him and you can take his wife.
Art = Tattoo
(http://groups.msn.com/_Secure/0XQANA7UdKpqHDAG6zfSPz3mKVTEry8IdwayI!yX7XNxwbPERBRzpA9OgYOfLVJtjLmd*Ghfdh!DnvLJvJDqwXSZhKMfoiBzcvvRGYX0Exnwm3rWuN54woorm1aDACJ0gQ6jR3evnFMQ/Herve%20Villechaize.jpg?dc=4675308960243672107)
Quote from: SD_Eagle on October 16, 2005, 09:50:14 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on October 16, 2005, 09:44:17 PM
Can I have permission to punch this guy if I ever see him?
Please? I'll bring a stool.
You don't know who you're dealing with :-D
Maybe MURP can punch him and you can take his wife.
More like Art wouldn't know who he's dealing with. ;)
I'd suggest a CF vs. ES match but I'm sure they'd bitch about the officiating after the beatdown.
Quote from: Geowhizzer on October 16, 2005, 09:51:13 PM
Art = Tattoo
(http://groups.msn.com/_Secure/0XQANA7UdKpqHDAG6zfSPz3mKVTEry8IdwayI!yX7XNxwbPERBRzpA9OgYOfLVJtjLmd*Ghfdh!DnvLJvJDqwXSZhKMfoiBzcvvRGYX0Exnwm3rWuN54woorm1aDACJ0gQ6jR3evnFMQ/Herve%20Villechaize.jpg?dc=4675308960243672107)
More like Twiky:
(http://rds.yahoo.com/S=96062883/K=%22buck+rogers%22/v=2/SID=e/TID=I999_73/l=IVI/SIG=13g7g25q5/EXP=1129600823/*-http%3A//www.nintendo-revolution.com/games/ps2/strategy/aliens_vs_predator_extinction_buck.jpg)
I love Art bashing
I'll bash Art.
Over the head with a 2x4.
Art pictorials!! :-D
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v481/bubba9497/9743ff57.jpg)
He's the oafish doofus behind Burnell in the Skins shirt with his arms at his side.
PG can take him. :paranoid
Is that really him?!?! :-D
The fat guy?
What a disgusting slob. Nice white pants, douchebag.
I think thats him. Check out the last page of his stupid blog, theres where I got it from.
That IS him! :-D :-D :-D
QuoteCouple ES appearances.
1) On FOX shot of Brunell taking a couple warm-up snaps from Cory Raymer after Rabach's nick, shot of Art on sidelines directly behind. The big guy in burgundy Skins shirt looking down ... with thinning dome. Any of you vid mavens do the honors?
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v481/bubba9497/36ea7fd1.jpg)
How they hell does someone who resembles the inaudible hick from The Waterboy get so cocky?
You talking about Farmer Fran?
He likes to see homos naked.
he put a piece of shtein article up on taterskins.com, i didn't think he looked like that, i was thinking thin but tall ???
I love the big urine stain on his pants.
Quote from: General_Failure on October 16, 2005, 11:27:10 PM
I love the big urine stain on his pants.
I think it's a banana in his pocket, or maybe he's just happy to be on the Skins sideline. :-X
Quote from: General_Failure on October 16, 2005, 10:54:14 PM
He likes to see homos naked.
:-D Different movie but funny none the less.
If he creamed his pants over that, imagine what he did when he had a private cigar smoke with Sonny Jergunson and Larry Michael.
Quote from: MDS on October 16, 2005, 11:48:09 PM
If he creamed his pants over that, imagine what he did when he had a private cigar smoke with Sonny Jergunson and Larry Michael.
I'll leave the homo erotic fantasies up to you.
I'm not the one who has a chode :paranoid
Urban definition of Chode (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=chode)
Never knew what it was :paranoid
Quote from: MDS on October 16, 2005, 11:51:06 PM
I'm not the one who has a chode :paranoid
We already knew that but thanks for sharing.
Quote from: SD_Eagle on October 16, 2005, 11:53:41 PM
Urban definition of Chode (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=chode)
Never knew what it was :paranoid
:-D #8 makes me laugh.
QuoteWe all know the literal translation. But most people use it as a derogatory term for somone who thinks they are WAY cooler than they really are.
Ryan Seacrest and Carson Daly... perfect examples
I think it's safe to add MDS to that list.
MDS = Choda Boy
(http://www.meloncorp.com/arch/0014/orgazmochoda.jpg)
:-D Orgazmo was a fantastic movie.
Quote from: MDS on October 16, 2005, 08:55:36 PM
Art went to the game, kept a blog and has gotten very cocky
It hurts to lose, wah wah wah (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=120847)
:-D What a douche...
QuoteProcession of players starts. High number -- couple dozen -- or so of fans getting autographs. Am approached by a couple asking if I'm with the team. Neither is a hot, blonde chick. Both are men. So, I say, "I'm just a groupie the team lets hang around. You know what I mean." The response, "Yeah, man, this is soooooo cool." They were right.
QuoteWatching the Notre Dame game. Guy asks what team is here. I say "The taterskins," though I'm in full gear, so what his problem was I do not know. Older lady with him thought all the players looked so nice. Dressed well. Younger lady in the area shows extreme interest in the Art. I'm now convinced a single man can get laid utilizing one of the following routines:
1. Pretend to be gay.
2. Have a puppy with you.
3. Have a baby with you.
4. Be in team gear in the team hotel and have people think you're, "With the team."
QuoteMark Brunell and Patrick Ramsey walk by. I mention to Mark we spoke last week. Blank look. Extremeskins.com. Small smile. Thumbs up
Brunell wanted to punch him in the face, I bet.
QuotePatrick Ramsey and Mark Brunell wander by again. Ramsey seems amused by baby in taterskins gear. Amused or terrified, can't really tell you. I holler at him to tell his brother Brandon to come on the site more. He seemed reasonably amused.
By now Brunell must be thinking about a restraining order. I know I would be.
QuoteGregg Williams coming through. I go up to him to introduce myself. "Hello, Coach Williams. We just wanted to thank you for the interview you did with me on Extremeskins." He shook my hand, even pulled me a little closer and said, "Yeah, Art." I didn't want to get in his way, and wished him luck, but, I could tell he would probably have spent a few minutes with me. He and Gibbs really have shown the know and appreciate the site.
Pulled you close, eh? Was that a playchart in his pocket, Art? Or was he just happy to see you?
QuoteBram comes up to continue chat about Arrington. Good exchange. Private convo, so you don't get to know.
Oooooh. F'ing show-off.
Quote from: MDS on October 16, 2005, 10:26:33 PM
Art pictorials!! :-D
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v481/bubba9497/9743ff57.jpg)
He's the oafish doofus behind Burnell in the Skins shirt with his arms at his side.
PG can take him. :paranoid
He's staring at Raymer's ass.
I'm telling you. The covering games, linkage with taterskins.com, interviews with various members of the franchise, private pow-wows with Jurgenson....the dude thinks hes hot shtein.
Someone needs to slap him up and remind him he runs a stupid message board for a bunch of clueless whining bitches
He thought he was hot shtein before he started doing this. Now its reached a vomit inducing level.
He reminds me of the dude in the NFL Shop commercials who hides in the dirty laundry basket to sniff jocks and suck on mouthpieces.
Except he has his mouth permantley attached to Gibbs' unit.
Indeed.
He douses "Coach" with Gatorade after each reach around.
Meanwhile...
Their defense still can't force turnovers
Their defense still can't sack opposing QBs
Clinton Portis has not scored a TD since December of 2004
Mark Brunell has throw the ball 94 times the last 2 weeks (53-DEN & 41-KC)
Lavar Arrington and his $12M cap number continue to ride the bench
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on October 17, 2005, 01:40:40 AM
Lavar Arrington and his $12M cap number continue to ride the bench
I think the Eagles should work a deal for Arrington for this reason alone - I'd like to see the 'skins carry 30-40% of the cap burden for the birds roster. Aren't they saying the same things about Lavar that they said about Trotter? Undiciplined, bum knee, freelancer...sounds like fresh meat for JJ.
C
Quote from: Sgt PSN on October 16, 2005, 10:03:24 PM
Quote from: Geowhizzer on October 16, 2005, 09:51:13 PM
Art = Tattoo
(http://groups.msn.com/_Secure/0XQANA7UdKpqHDAG6zfSPz3mKVTEry8IdwayI!yX7XNxwbPERBRzpA9OgYOfLVJtjLmd*Ghfdh!DnvLJvJDqwXSZhKMfoiBzcvvRGYX0Exnwm3rWuN54woorm1aDACJ0gQ6jR3evnFMQ/Herve%20Villechaize.jpg?dc=4675308960243672107)
More like Twiky:
(http://rds.yahoo.com/S=96062883/K=%22buck+rogers%22/v=2/SID=e/TID=I999_73/l=IVI/SIG=13g7g25q5/EXP=1129600823/*-http%3A//www.nintendo-revolution.com/games/ps2/strategy/aliens_vs_predator_extinction_buck.jpg)
Bee-dee-bee-dee-bee-dee... the Skins suck, Buck.
Quote from: MDS on October 17, 2005, 01:14:00 AM
Someone needs to slap him up and remind him he runs a stupid message board for a bunch of clueless whining bitches
Uhhh... :paranoid we're still talking about Art here, right man?
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 14, 2005, 03:52:41 PM
Quote from: terpseagles on October 14, 2005, 08:59:17 AM
No answer archer ? Huh, you Skins fans have more in common w/ the Extremehomers than you think.....
so do you, damn over 650 posts over there, i got over 100 here and that is a hell of a lot but to post 650 times at ES is just crazy
well, seeing as how you went through all the trouble to research me and my post count over on ES, did you also notice that I've been a member there since Feb. of '03 ? That's about 32 months. So then I'm sure you realized that it works out to less than 25 posts a month over there.... which I'm sure you know is less than 1 post per day.
But hey, thanks for noticing.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 16, 2005, 11:26:06 PM
he put a piece of shtein article up on taterskins.com, i didn't think he looked like that, i was thinking thin but tall ???
Here's a better one taken when his lip herpes flared up.
(http://image20.webshots.com/20/3/64/22/193636422wnNAtd_ph.jpg)
i'm sure if i could view it i'd appreciate the picture...
Quote from: T_Section224 on October 17, 2005, 11:02:57 AM
i'm sure if i could view it i'd appreciate the picture...
You would, he's very attractive in it.
The taterskins being competetive is really starting to make my goddamned blood boil. I farging hate that whole goddamned team.
Quote from: Beermonkey on October 17, 2005, 10:54:59 AM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 16, 2005, 11:26:06 PM
he put a piece of shtein article up on taterskins.com, i didn't think he looked like that, i was thinking thin but tall ???
Here's a better one taken when his lip herpes flared up.
(http://image20.webshots.com/20/3/64/22/193636422wnNAtd_ph.jpg)
I can see why the blondies think he's the shizznit :-D
I believe their game vs. SF will determine their season. In fact, I told a 4skin friend of mine a couple weeks prior that the SF game was more important than the Bronco or Chief games (I expected them to lose to both clubs)...
If they win, I see them as a 9-7, 10-6 club.
On the other hand, if they drop that game, I foresee a death spiral of losing that will culminate with Gibbs hanging it up, Williams moving on (he's the favorite to land in Minnesota), and the rest of the Skin faithful looking forward to their 4 draft picks in 2006. :-D
It would take a choke of gigantic proportions for them to lose to SanFran and their rookie QB.
Art what are you lookin for back there, buddy?
(http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=17516&stc=1)
taterskins = stone cold mortal lock vs. 49ers
The 49ers are awful.
What a bunch of fairies. They are threatning to ban anyone who starts a Lavar topic over at ES.
http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=121299
Jesus. They live in a self-regulated fantasy world over there. Remarkable.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on October 16, 2005, 09:44:17 PM
Can I have permission to punch this guy if I ever see him?
Please? I'll bring a stool.
No Eagle fan needs permission to punch a Skins fan. Just do it.
p.s., I'd love to be there to have your back, not that you'd need it.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on October 17, 2005, 01:08:49 AM
Quote from: MDS on October 16, 2005, 10:26:33 PM
Art pictorials!! :-D
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v481/bubba9497/9743ff57.jpg)
He's the oafish doofus behind Burnell in the Skins shirt with his arms at his side.
PG can take him. :paranoid
He's staring at Raymer's ass.
Please tell me he's not emulating Gibbs' stance. Hands on hips, feet outward, head tilted slightly down and to the left. I'm almost surprised he doesn't have a little fake headset on...(http://media.theinsiders.com/Media/Other/34853_doh.GIF)
"Hey mister Gibbs, wanna play shadow?"
Damn! He is imitating him! :-D :-D
Art = creepy stalker
QuoteAfter leaving Arrowhead last night, I went and had a couple of cigars with family, relaxed and got a little tipsy . This morning we packed up and drove back. I really just got in and settled so I've had what I assume is likely the great benefit of not having to read the bulk of posts on this board since yesterday.
Just a couple of observations.
This team has a seriousness about it that I like. I was walking around the Chiefs sideline and they had one guy who was not dressed talking to two guys who were and the one who was not was doing a mock sexual act to the laughter of his teammates.
You never saw that kind of thing on our sidelines. These guys are very confident in themselves and very serious about the job. I liked that. Years of hearing about laughter and fun in a losing locker room, I was in the locker room yesterday and was intrigued by the total quiet. These guys were upset. They were unhappy. They were in a bad mood.
They talked to the media but only in the most perfunctory of ways. The most cliche of ways. These guys were angry at themselves for letting another get away. They know what we know -- that the last two teams we've played aren't anywhere near as good a team as we are, but we lost. This is, I have a feeling, going to serve as something of a compelling force toward a wonderful all around effort coming soon.
The offense is efficient and capable, but not yet consistent enough to put things away and the turnovers are crushing. The defense is still stingy and able, but, bigger plays are happening, bumping scoring up some. The two pieces are nearly there. Statistically we're rated highly in both categories, but both are lacking still. Both are still a hair off. Once things align, this team has scary potential.
Special teams is still a concern without Hall -- in my view -- but this week they didn't hurt us at all.
I'm sure people here are alternately furious with the offense for their turnovers that cost us or the defense for the big play that gave the Chiefs the lead. But, this is a team that is pushing other teams around right now with huge margins in performance out there. While it can always turn sour for us, we're more likely to have a culminating effort than a back step and this team is capable of hitting a very nice run.
Things that have been lacking for years appear to be coming together for this team. The lack of false starts despite what was a VERY loud stadium is encouraging -- though it was only REALLY terrible the last couple of minutes. The execution is outstanding for the most part on both sides of the ball. The offense needs to retain the ball and the defense needs to stop the major big play against. Both of those things will happen and when they do this team is one we'll be very proud of.
Oh no! Not the mock sexual acts!
And I love how he seems to know what the team is thinking. Mind reader?
Quote from: EJ72 on October 18, 2005, 12:50:36 AM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on October 17, 2005, 01:08:49 AM
Quote from: MDS on October 16, 2005, 10:26:33 PM
Art pictorials!! :-D
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v481/bubba9497/9743ff57.jpg)
He's the oafish doofus behind Burnell in the Skins shirt with his arms at his side.
PG can take him. :paranoid
He's staring at Raymer's ass.
Please tell me he's not emulating Gibbs' stance. Hands on hips, feet outward, head tilted slightly down and to the left. I'm almost surprised he doesn't have a little fake headset on...(http://media.theinsiders.com/Media/Other/34853_doh.GIF)
the guy in the black is not gibbs
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 18, 2005, 06:36:53 AMthe guy in the black is not gibbs
doesn't really matter now, does it, he still looks like a fool for playing shadow with him.
QuoteJason La Canfora, of the Washington Post, reports the Washington taterskins have the second-worst turnover differential in the league at minus-8. The team has gone four entire games without recovering a fumble or intercepting a pass and also ranks last in sacks per pass play.
:-D
And yet the guy who can force turnovers and sacks QBs (arrington) is chillin on the bench all the time.
Oops, looks like the Skins are finally where they belong in last place.
In other news, I drafted Santana Moss as my 3rd receiver in one fantasy league, after Javon Walker and Steve Smith.
2/3 ain't bad.
Quote from: phattymatty on October 18, 2005, 07:14:52 PM
Oops, looks like the Skins are finally where they belong in last place.
and the eagles are right beside them. good job you guys, you must've worked hard to get where you are today.
the skins are only 3-2 because the refs have it in for them.
(http://www.taterskins.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/OHJFKNLBLFGG/_E7T4207PG.jpg)
(http://www.taterskins.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/OHJFKNLBLFGG/55726348PG.jpg)
While I'm sure that really gets to Dallasfan, it doesn't really do anything for me. Sorry.
I guess he's trying to aggravate the "Inner Cowboy fan" in all of us.
He doesn't know that I already took a dump this morning though.
(http://www.taterskins.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/DECDDKPMMHMG/5C5A7688PG.jpg)
Meanwhile, in their last game.
(http://www.kcchiefs.com/media/images/4C195105D6514575AA7CAD2C21A58D55.JPG)
We're not Bears fans, either. I'm not sure if you're getting any closer, geographically speaking.
(http://gallery.phillyburbs.com/photos/63/7.aspx)
That still doesn't change the fact that your team has sucked ass the past 10 years.
(http://www.taterskins.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/BCCKOEBOFKMO/taterskins_8795018PG.jpg)
(http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=12636&stc=1)
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 22, 2005, 08:37:59 PM
(http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=12636&stc=1)
That was the best
X ever! :D
No questions asked :bash
I have $100.00 they come back here later today talking shtein about how great they are now because they pounded the Niners. Whatever the outcomes between the Eagles game and the Foreskins game, they will somehow relate the two to put the taterskins in the best light. An example would be, "You guys only beat the Chargers by a TD, we beat the Niners by two. I want to have Coach Gibbs' man babies."
Hopefully, by some strange coincidence they blow it, and the niners crush them at FedEx.
holy crap its 14-0. skins are amazing.
holy crap it's 52-17, and the taterskins actually won. the eagles are about to beat the chargers in a close win. suprising to see how bad you shut down l.t.. good game for you guys today.
no we don't brag about beating the 9ers that is you guys. YOu guys were telling us we had easy games when you played much easier games and you were all saying that you actually win your games buy a lot and citing your 9ers game.
i am called a comma, i seperate things in sentances.
2 weeks till the big snf meeting. the only thing youll win is verbal blowjobs from the announcing crew.
You can't say anything about a 52-17 asswhippin'.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 23, 2005, 04:52:15 PM
no we don't brag about beating the 9ers that is you guys. YOu guys were telling us we had easy games when you played much easier games and you were all saying that you actually win your games buy a lot and citing your 9ers game.
Jesus Christ man. Use some commas and throw in period.
Hey, after you guys finished up pounding the AFL's pride and joy, did Gibbs get another Gatorade bath? Or did he just spank one off on Art's face and call it a day?
Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC on October 23, 2005, 05:14:12 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 23, 2005, 04:52:15 PM
no we don't brag about beating the 9ers that is you guys. YOu guys were telling us we had easy games when you played much easier games and you were all saying that you actually win your games buy a lot and citing your 9ers game.
Jesus Christ man. Use some commas and throw in period.
i love run on sentences and i think they're great and periods are stupid because i said so and we don't brag about beating the 9ers because that is what art is for and....
Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC on October 23, 2005, 05:14:12 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 23, 2005, 04:52:15 PM
no we don't brag about beating the 9ers that is you guys. YOu guys were telling us we had easy games when you played much easier games and you were all saying that you actually win your games buy a lot and citing your 9ers game.
Jesus Christ man. Use some commas and throw in period.
Hey, after you guys finished up pounding the AFL's pride and joy, did Gibbs get another Gatorade bath? Or did he just spank one off on Art's face and call it a day?
:-D :-D :-D
Go Skins!
(http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20051023/capt.fdx11110232129.49ers_taterskins_fdx111.jpg)
Go egals
(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a256/qwert246/Egals%20Suck%20Ritchie%20Kotites%20Sack/idiotshoulderpadgoof.jpg)
The trashman is trying unsuccessfully to hold one in.
I picked the Skins in my suicide league, played Brunell in a fantasy league, and played the Skins D in two fantasy leagues. I thought all of that would certainly be the kiss of death, but the 49ers just suck wayyyyy too much.
Quote from: qwert246 on October 23, 2005, 09:38:54 PM
Go egals
(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a256/qwert246/Egals%20Suck%20Ritchie%20Kotites%20Sack/idiotshoulderpadgoof.jpg)
difference is...we all hate that guy...Skins fans probably bow at the feet of that fat slob.
Sign em up for babes of the week
(http://extremeskins.com/49ers/DSC_0218.JPG)
There's nothing there a little photoshop can't fix.
Quote from: PhillyGirl on October 23, 2005, 10:05:24 PM
Quote from: qwert246 on October 23, 2005, 09:38:54 PM
Go egals
(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a256/qwert246/Egals%20Suck%20Ritchie%20Kotites%20Sack/idiotshoulderpadgoof.jpg)
difference is...we all hate that guy...Skins fans probably bow at the feet of that fat slob.
You all love him and his egals shoulderpads. WIP loves him some superfan
no, he's a douchebag.
Quote from: MDS on October 23, 2005, 10:10:24 PM
Sign em up for babes of the week
(http://extremeskins.com/49ers/DSC_0218.JPG)
Ewww. I was so focused on their ugliness that I didn't even notice they were Skins fans at first. Double ewww.
Besides, you only think they're hot because that one chick has her collar down. But you can tell it was popped earlier. The wind must have blown it down or something.
now wonder they all gobble up gibbs knob, look at what their fan base looks like.
I guess the mods edited out the pic of Sean the idiot philly fan.
farging Hoydas. Don't like the pic so just take it out. As snorkelingwhore would say ::) ::)
(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a256/qwert246/Egals%20Suck%20Ritchie%20Kotites%20Sack/phillydh.jpg)
hes still better looking that the dogs you call female taterskin fans
Quote from: qwert246 on October 23, 2005, 09:38:54 PM
Go egals
(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a256/qwert246/Egals%20Suck%20Ritchie%20Kotites%20Sack/idiotshoulderpadgoof.jpg)
Quote from: qwert246 on October 23, 2005, 10:21:37 PM
I guess the mods edited out the pic of Sean the idiot philly fan.
farging Hoydas. Don't like the pic so just take it out. As snorkelingwhore would say ::) ::)
Retard.
Quote from: General_Failure on October 23, 2005, 10:27:00 PM
Quote from: qwert246 on October 23, 2005, 09:38:54 PM
Go egals
(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a256/qwert246/Egals%20Suck%20Ritchie%20Kotites%20Sack/idiotshoulderpadgoof.jpg)
Quote from: qwert246 on October 23, 2005, 10:21:37 PM
I guess the mods edited out the pic of Sean the idiot philly fan.
farging Hoydas. Don't like the pic so just take it out. As snorkelingwhore would say ::) ::)
Retard.
My fault, GF. That was a premature farging Hoydas rant.
I take it back.
While you're taking it back, feel free to shove it up your ass.
I'll let you take care of the gay buttsex.
Okay, but when I'm shoving things up there I'm not going to lube you first. Somebody get the magic 8 ball!
QuoteI love this offense. There are weapons and great design. This team has the potential to be SCARY. Just keep it together and play it for 60 minutes. This is fantastic.
Guess who.
George Bush?
first off i have never seen that fat ass till today. He got a little 10 second thing during the game. I don't want to know what that is or where it came from.
BUT, you must repect these "super fans" for what they do...... to some extent
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 23, 2005, 11:26:07 PM
first off i have never seen that fat ass till today. He got a little 10 second thing during the game. I don't want to know what that is or where it came from.
BUT, you must repect these "super fans" for what they do...... to some extent
I found it on Yahoo (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/photo?slug=fdx11110232129.49ers_taterskins_fdx111&prov=ap)
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 23, 2005, 11:37:56 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on October 23, 2005, 11:31:59 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 23, 2005, 11:26:07 PM
first off i have never seen that fat ass till today. He got a little 10 second thing during the game. I don't want to know what that is or where it came from.
BUT, you must repect these "super fans" for what they do...... to some extent
I found it on Yahoo (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/photo?slug=fdx11110232129.49ers_taterskins_fdx111&prov=ap)
he caught a football too?? well i wouldn't get in his way during the pursuit
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 23, 2005, 11:38:19 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 23, 2005, 11:37:56 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on October 23, 2005, 11:31:59 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 23, 2005, 11:26:07 PM
first off i have never seen that fat ass till today. He got a little 10 second thing during the game. I don't want to know what that is or where it came from.
BUT, you must repect these "super fans" for what they do...... to some extent
I found it on Yahoo (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/photo?slug=fdx11110232129.49ers_taterskins_fdx111&prov=ap)
he caught a football too?? well i wouldn't get in his way during the pursuit
by the way that guy is on the coors light highlight reel on sportcener.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 23, 2005, 04:52:15 PM
no we don't brag about beating the 9ers that is you guys. YOu guys were telling us we had easy games when you played much easier games and you were all saying that you actually win your games buy a lot and citing your 9ers game.
(http://images.art.com/images/PRODUCTS/Regular/10075000/10075453.jpg)
QuoteMrs. Krabappel and Principal Skinner were in the closet making babies and I saw one of the babies and then the baby looked at me.
QuoteI heard your dad went into a restaurant and ate everything in the restaurant and they had to close the restaurant
(http://extremeskins.com/test/49ers/49ers%20015.jpg)
Talk about hangin out with the coolest gang in town. I'm sure the CF tailgates pale in comparision to these super awsome gatherings.
(http://extremeskins.com/test/49ers/49ers%20029.jpg)
When not watching Star Wars or collecting Lord of the Rings toys, these cats help run ExtremeSkins.
Wow.
Impressive win against the Arena Team yesterday.
I see Mr. $64M RB finally figured out where the end-zone was. Impressive.
I saw the score flash at the Linc yesterday and I told Beermonkey that Extremeskins was likely having a huge orgy. Looks like I was right.
Art The Media Maven is up to his usual ball sucking.
Next week will tell us a lot about both the taterskins and Giants.
Is it possible that I will actually be rooting for the giants next week?
No, you'll be rooting against your beloved taterskins. There's a difference.
Go Giants.
I am rooting for a turnover laden, messy, sloppy 6-3 Jints win.
Then we'll still have to hear how great the Skins defense is. Make it 21-3.
Good point.
And did I hear that Lavar was crying after the game yesterday because he actually got to play?
Vadge.
The Giants' defense sucks donkey ass. They're going to need Brunell to go back to Brunelling or this could be a shootout. Ugh.
Stats mean everything
QuoteHow about that for some triplets?
With a QB rating of 98.3, Brunell is the top rated QB in the NFC. He's tied for third overall with Peyton Manning league wide.
Moss is the #1 WR in yards (743).
Portis is ranked 8th overall in rushing yards (544). At this pace, he's on track for 1451 yards.
Not too bad.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on October 24, 2005, 01:38:36 PM
Good point.
And did I hear that Lavar was crying after the game yesterday because he actually got to play?
Vadge.
Yeah, they traded consitency from above average linebackers for 'big play ability' and blown assignments from thier supa-duppa fan favorite - Numba 56.
This was seriously a result of media coverage. Living here, listening to sports radio and the like, it was
all they have been talking about for several weeks. It's unbelievable to me the way the this FO operates with regard to the media. Gibbs was constantly defending himself, and his stance to the media. You'd figure they would be like the other 99% of teams, and let the media go farg themselves.
at wash dc area papa johns you can get 14 free toppings on your pizza today
skins 103 pts allowed
birds 118 pts allowed
Are there even 14 toppings available to put on pizza?
Those slices will be loaded.
A pizza with 14 toppings would be f'ing disgusting.
[art]Just to add to this. There will be daily Lavar threads based on coverage of the issue. You will have plenty of space to express yourself. Just try not to be pests[/art]
How does he get his head through doorways at this point?
:-D
Quote from: rjs246 on October 24, 2005, 03:30:08 PM
A pizza with 14 toppings would be f'ing disgusting.
Veggie lovers with bacon. It's good. And requires two paper plates per slice.
The only 'veggie' I put anywhere near my pizza is mushrooms and that's really a fungus. Cooked peppers and onions are weak shtein. Black olives can eat my balls. I need dead animals on my pie, and lots of them.
Quote from: MDS on October 24, 2005, 01:46:39 PM
Stats mean everything
QuoteHow about that for some triplets?
With a QB rating of 98.3, Brunell is the top rated QB in the NFC. He's tied for third overall with Peyton Manning league wide.
Moss is the #1 WR in yards (743).
Portis is ranked 8th overall in rushing yards (544). At this pace, he's on track for 1451 yards.
Not too bad.
Yeah, especially 4-2.
The 'Skins have the 2nd ranked offense in the league despite playing 3 of the top 10 defenses, and the 4th ranked D despite playing 3 of the top 10 offenses. They have also played the 6th hardest schedule thus far. They're the only team in the NFL to have both units ranked in the top 5 and only Indy has both in the top 10 (defense is 6th and offense is 8th). I'm not saying this team is the best or anything but we are certainly a team that can contend for a playoff spot.
Your mom can contend for a playoff spot in my bed.
Quote from: FFatPatt on October 24, 2005, 03:59:09 PM
Your mom can contend for a playoff spot in my bed.
Oh snap!
Are there even 14 toppings available to put on pizza?
Those slices will be loaded
they have 17 toppings...extra cheese counting as one...im getting them all but pineapple...hot fruit is for the gays...jalapeno and yellow peppers
the slice weight will not be a factor as i plan to eat it with a knife...i also suspect that they are gonna come real weak on the topping amounts
Quote from: twatson on October 24, 2005, 03:58:18 PM
Quote from: MDS on October 24, 2005, 01:46:39 PM
Stats mean everything
QuoteHow about that for some triplets?
With a QB rating of 98.3, Brunell is the top rated QB in the NFC. He's tied for third overall with Peyton Manning league wide.
Moss is the #1 WR in yards (743).
Portis is ranked 8th overall in rushing yards (544). At this pace, he's on track for 1451 yards.
Not too bad.
Yeah, especially 4-2.
The 'Skins have the 2nd ranked offense in the league despite playing 3 of the top 10 defenses, and the 4th ranked D despite playing 3 of the top 10 offenses. They have also played the 6th hardest schedule thus far. They're the only team in the NFL to have both units ranked in the top 5 and only Indy has both in the top 10 (defense is 6th and offense is 8th). I'm not saying this team is the best or anything but we are certainly a team that can contend for a playoff spot.
don't worry about it, save your breath. There is no need to show any reason for anything you say to these people. Remember they think we will score 3 points against the 30th defense in the league. I see the taterskins having a hell of a hard time in NY but i do think they have a better chance against the eagles at home. I am hoping to win 2 of the next 3, that would be pretty good.
(http://extremeskins.com/test/49ers/49ers%20453.jpg)
Wow, a picture of nothing. That's great.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 24, 2005, 04:18:10 PM
Quote from: twatson on October 24, 2005, 03:58:18 PM
Quote from: MDS on October 24, 2005, 01:46:39 PM
Stats mean everything
QuoteHow about that for some triplets?
With a QB rating of 98.3, Brunell is the top rated QB in the NFC. He's tied for third overall with Peyton Manning league wide.
Moss is the #1 WR in yards (743).
Portis is ranked 8th overall in rushing yards (544). At this pace, he's on track for 1451 yards.
Not too bad.
Yeah, especially 4-2.
The 'Skins have the 2nd ranked offense in the league despite playing 3 of the top 10 defenses, and the 4th ranked D despite playing 3 of the top 10 offenses. They have also played the 6th hardest schedule thus far. They're the only team in the NFL to have both units ranked in the top 5 and only Indy has both in the top 10 (defense is 6th and offense is 8th). I'm not saying this team is the best or anything but we are certainly a team that can contend for a playoff spot.
don't worry about it, save your breath. There is no need to show any reason for anything you say to these people. Remember they think we will score 3 points against the 30th defense in the league. I see the taterskins having a hell of a hard time in NY but i do think they have a better chance against the eagles at home. I am hoping to win 2 of the next 3, that would be pretty good.
That just about farging says it. Why the farg are you here anyway? To talk football or to just try instigate arguements? Why spend your time here with
us people? Go farging hang out at ILuvMeSumGibbsProtienShake.net or IHeartTongueDouchingArt'sAssForKicks.com. farging idiot.
basically all i heard was that gibbs man juice tastes good and that greg williams' taint is constantley in skins fans mouth
gibbs man juice tastes good
extremeskins is so bad that if you posted that on there youd be labeled a hater...bar none is the most homertastic board of any team in any sport on the internet
its beyond sickening
Quote from: ice grillin you on October 24, 2005, 05:13:29 PM
gibbs man juice tastes good
extremeskins is so bad that if you posted that on there youd be labeled a hater...bar none is the most homertastic board of any team in any sport on the internet
its beyond sickening
that is the reason why the taterskins picked up extremeskins. THey are "homertastic" and the local media is not. Snyder is tired of dumb media so he picked up the biggest homers he could find to write columns about how good the taterskins are and in return these homers get to stand on the sidelines and have free roam over the stadium. I find it funny people here actually care about the opinions of extreme, they are self proclaimed homers that admit the only reason they are part of the taterskins is because they are blind taterskin followers
we dont care, we find it comical and entertaining
Right now the taterskins are the 2nd best team in the division behind the Eagles. I did not expect this at all, but if their offense plays well then they will be a very solid team. I don't think the offense will revert to being as bad as last year, but I also think it won't continue to play this well either. Out of the Giants, Cowboys, and the taterskins, the taterskins are the most balanced on both sides of the ball. Also unlike the Giants, the taterskins actually have played well on the road this year, despite losing they kept the games very close against two tough teams.
Quote from: General_Failure on October 24, 2005, 04:43:21 PM
Wow, a picture of nothing. That's great.
Dude....you're so wrong.
He obviously was posting the pic so we could see Jeremy Thornburg in a 49ers uniform.
This has nothing to do with the taterskins but I found it amusing none the less:
QuoteThe Falcons are an exciting football team with Michael Vick at quarterback, but he's not only explosive he's also becoming a better pocket passer. He's shown very good patience and is allowing his receivers the opportunity to get open before he makes the decision to pass. One of the main keys to this offense though is RB Warrick Dunn. He's one of the best and most underrated backs in the league. He's explosive, tough and gutsy but for one reason or another never receives his due. Let me tell you this, the Falcons won't win this game without a good game from him.
-- Joe Theismann
There is literally so much in that quote that is factually inaccurate, I really have to question the reading comprehension skills of the editor @ ESPN.com for allowing it to be published in the first place.
I mean, wtf?
:-D
ESPN = Vick hogsmokers.
Theismann = biggest Vick hog smoker
Hi, we're taterskin fans and our vaginas hurt (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=122694)
QuoteI know it is early, the Eagles game is not until two weeks but I saw on www.stubhub.com that someone is selling 34 tickets to the taterskins/Eagles game! Here is the link below http://www.stubhub.com/?ticket_id=13364174. This is my first time posting, but do any of you know if there is someone we can report this to? That is absurd that someone would have 34 tickets (all together) and would be selling them! I waited 25 years to get my 4 season tickets to each game, that really pisses me off that someone has 34 tickets, and they are selling them!
QuoteSeriously we need to do something aobut people selling fed ex field tickets to scum eagles fans.
QuoteI emailed the taterskins ticket office about it. I doubt anything happens, but can't hurt.
F'ing pusses. Boooohoooo our fans suck so much that they sell tickets. And they have the audacity to sell them to Eagles fans who are each a little piece of Satan.
Grow a set of balls...what a buncha Nancy's.
Maybe if they had more fans than seats in their stadium they wouldn't run into this sort of problem.
QuoteI waited 25 years to get my 4 season tickets to each game
What a dumbass. He could have been getting them from the guy who's got 34 of them in a group.
Ba-zing!
what a bunch of vaginas. every game has plenty of tickets available on stub hub or stupid ticket brokers. what the farg is this little panzy bitching about?
Quote from: ice grillin you on October 24, 2005, 04:08:02 PM
they have 17 toppings...extra cheese counting as one...im getting them all but pineapple...hot fruit is for the gays...jalapeno and yellow peppers
the slice weight will not be a factor as i plan to eat it with a knife...i also suspect that they are gonna come real weak on the topping amounts
its one topping for every touchdown, so only 7 toppings. i came home from work and my chick had aleady bought one. she roots for the skins to score every week simply for the pizza deal.
its one topping for every touchdown, so only 7 toppings
nope this year its one for each td X two
Quote from: ice grillin you on October 25, 2005, 08:19:13 AM
its one topping for every touchdown, so only 7 toppings
nope this year its one for each td X two
Oh cool, I didn't know that. The we got jipped yesterday.
well some places computers could only handle a certain amount in their order and others dont even carry 14 toppings
theres an article about it in the post today
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 24, 2005, 04:36:05 PM
(http://extremeskins.com/test/49ers/49ers%20453.jpg)
Seriously, what's the point of posting this picture?
Art got himself some mad camera skillz now, I guess.
so thats what god looks like
If you look close enough you can see Art beating one out onto Gibbs' back.
Yes. He's an blurry older man with 70s headphones and poor taste in clothing.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 24, 2005, 06:09:59 PM
I find it funny people here actually care about the opinions of extreme...
Look at the title of the thread you're in then think about that again...
I find it funny people here actually care about the opinions of extreme...
no one cares...well i do a little....but mostly is just fun to watch how badly skins fans play themselves
Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC on October 24, 2005, 01:47:58 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on October 24, 2005, 01:38:36 PM
Good point.
And did I hear that Lavar was crying after the game yesterday because he actually got to play?
Vadge.
Yeah, they traded consitency from above average linebackers for 'big play ability' and blown assignments from thier supa-duppa fan favorite - Numba 56.
This was seriously a result of media coverage. Living here, listening to sports radio and the like, it was all they have been talking about for several weeks. It's unbelievable to me the way the this FO operates with regard to the media. Gibbs was constantly defending himself, and his stance to the media. You'd figure they would be like the other 99% of teams, and let the media go farg themselves.
I think it had to have been a little embarassing for them, not just becuase of the media.
You've got $7 mill sitting on the bench, and you can't find a way to make it work?
Quote from: methdeez on October 25, 2005, 07:05:12 PM
I think it had to have been a little embarassing for them, not just becuase of the media.
You've got $7 mill sitting on the bench, and you can't find a way to make it work?
It's an alternative to their previous methods of having $85 million
on the field and can't find a way to make it work.
It's probably a step up from having $35 mil on other fields.
Quote from: General_Failure on October 25, 2005, 07:18:28 PM
It's probably a step up from having $35 mil on other fields.
Regardless of how much time he plays this year, I see Arrington's days in Washington coming to an end, with another beautifully delicious major cap hit.
thanks taterskins, i just ate the rest of my papa johns pizza. go portis!
not only do they have a racist symbol...but now they are paying to teach people how to shoot indians....snyder is despicable
taterskins-NRA Event Draws D.C. Activists
Handful of Demonstrators Protest Gun Group's Effort to Repeal Laws
By Lori Montgomery
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, October 26, 2005; B01
They stood in the rain on a frigid country road, waving sodden protest signs as water dripped from the hoods of their too-thin jackets. But the nine young men and women from Southeast Washington weren't about to go away, even if they didn't always agree about what they were protesting.
"Don't support the NRA and the taterskins!" yelled Ronald H. Moten, co-founder of Peaceoholics, a group that works with at-risk District youths.
"Hey!" a few of his friends hollered, clearly appalled by the notion of publicly withdrawing their allegiance from the Washington taterskins -- especially when they are winning.
Moten laughed. "I love 'em, too, but they're wrong right now."
Moten organized yesterday's protest at the Prince George's County Trap and Skeet Center, where the taterskins were holding a charity shooting competition in alliance with NRA Sports, a division of the National Rifle Association.
The Peaceoholics and members of another youth counseling group said they were outraged by the taterskins' decision to hook up with the NRA at a time when the nation's largest gun-rights organization is lobbying for repeal of the District's gun laws.
Legalizing handguns would put more of them on the street, the protesters argued, creating exponentially more opportunities for young African Americans like them to be shot.
"I don't support the NRA at all. They don't care about the residents of D.C. If they did, they wouldn't lobby for this bill," said James Ford, 27.
"We are losing our black youth at a rapid rate in the city. If our team is willing to support something that would kill the next generation of fans, then I need to protest."
The taterskins Charitable Foundation sponsored yesterday's competition to benefit children in the Washington region, charging participants as much as $25,000 to shoot clay targets with former and current players. The NRA acted as technical adviser, according to a group spokesman.
taterskins spokesman Karl Swanson said last week that the event was apolitical and that the taterskins do not support the NRA's political activities or its efforts to repeal D.C. gun laws.
Yesterday, Swanson declined to elaborate or to meet with reporters.
"Nobody wants to talk to you," said a large man in taterskins garb who stood guard outside the event. He would not give his name.
Down by the main road, the protesters waved their signs. "Pollin changed the Bullets. Snyder, get rid of NRA," said one, referring to taterskins owner Daniel M. Snyder and the decision by Abe Pollin to rename his basketball team the Wizards. "Say NO to Gunz," said another. And: "Our peers are dying. Why would you support the NRA?"
But the group's vigil was lonely. A taterskins employee and a police officer placed their vehicles at the end of the shooting center's long, wooded lane. They refused to let the protesters pass, even after Moten warned that the NRA lobbies for the legalization of armor-piercing bullets.
"That'll go right through your vest!" he yelled to the officer. "C'mon, let us in."
Participants in the sporting clay competition sped by the protesters in Jeeps and luxury SUVs. In their haste, many took a wrong turn up the exit drive, so the police officer and the taterskins employee shouted and turned them back toward the entrance.
"Now they got to back up and hear it all again," said protester Daniel Bradley, 24.
While the activists chanted, several dozen taterskins guests enjoyed an autumnal buffet done up in burgundy and gold in a pavilion inside the shooting center. Men in green NRA vests mingled with men in burgundy jackets bearing taterskins logos.
Sam Brunelli, a former tackle for the Denver Broncos who now lives in Georgetown, was one of the celebrity shooters. Brunelli said he thinks Congress should repeal the D.C. gun laws.
"I think . . . the right to keep and bear arms should not be infringed," Brunelli said. "That is the law of the land, and it should be the law in D.C."
As for the protesters, their presence barely registered.
"I didn't understand it," said Jack Martin, a decorating contractor from Owings Mills, Md.
"About the time I noticed them, the police waved us on through."
Quote from: ice grillin you on October 26, 2005, 08:08:48 AM
"Nobody wants to talk to you," said a large man in taterskins garb who stood guard outside the event. He would not give his name.
ART!
Quote from: henchmanUK on October 26, 2005, 09:01:38 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on October 26, 2005, 08:08:48 AM
"Nobody wants to talk to you," said a large man in taterskins garb who stood guard outside the event. He would not give his name.
ART!
:-D :-D
QuoteLegalizing handguns would put more of them on the street, the protesters argued, creating exponentially more opportunities for young African Americans like them to be shot.
Or maybe, just maybe, it would allow honest law abiding citizens to purchase handguns legally and be able to protect themselves against the guy who has a Saturday Night Special.
Like the crooks don't already have guns and won't continue to get them. It ain't that hard.
Art gets a boner when Skins destroy Niners (http://www.taterskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=11860)
Quote from: shorebird on October 27, 2005, 03:39:47 PM
QuoteLegalizing handguns would put more of them on the street, the protesters argued, creating exponentially more opportunities for young African Americans like them to be shot.
Or maybe, just maybe, it would allow honest law abiding citizens to purchase handguns legally and be able to protect themselves against the guy who has a Saturday Night Special.
Like the crooks don't already have guns and won't continue to get them. It ain't that hard.
It's that hard in every other 1st world country where non-hunting guns are illegal and where gun deaths are 1/100th of ours.
(http://www.taterskins.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/CMAFONDANING/taterskins_8829280PG.jpg)
we're the number two offense in the league bitch
Moss: "Yeah Clinton! You've finally found the endzone again"
Dockery: "Yeah, I thought he forgot where it was. Hadn't been there since 2004"
Royal: "I'm just another H-Back in the world of 47 H-backs. Don't mind me"
taterskins...pimpin ho's and smokin dope since 1999.
QuoteThere is no doubt we are becoming a good football team. A Joe Gibbs hard nosed humble squad that shows up every Sunday.
I've heard at least 6 players say "we are building something special here", a far cry from Bruce Smith chasing the sack record or Deon pointing at the sky and then tip toeing out of bounds.
It's going to be very sweet when Gibbs wins coach of the year and the idiots who claimed the game has passed him by have to eat a huge load of crow.
Gibbs will handle it with pure class as always and credit the players.
the homerism is in full form. i love it.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 27, 2005, 07:48:49 PM
(http://www.taterskins.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/CMAFONDANING/taterskins_8829280PG.jpg)
This is for all my homies representin' in the DTC. Ya heeeeeerd!
Quote from: MDS on October 27, 2005, 08:24:38 PM
QuoteThere is no doubt we are becoming a good football team. A Joe Gibbs hard nosed humble squad that shows up every Sunday.
I've heard at least 6 players say "we are building something special here", a far cry from Bruce Smith chasing the sack record or Deon pointing at the sky and then tip toeing out of bounds.
It's going to be very sweet when Gibbs wins coach of the year and the idiots who claimed the game has passed him by have to eat a huge load of crow.
Gibbs will handle it with pure class as always and credit the players.
the homerism is in full form. i love it.
Did he forget they have Thrash on the roster again?
unlike deion, trash needs to do something before he points to the sky. and since he lacks the talent to get open and catch the ball, his pointing to the sky chances are limited.
This weeks Giants/Skins game is gonna' be good.
Quote from: shorebird on October 27, 2005, 09:52:39 PM
This weeks Giants/Skins game is gonna' be good.
so is eagles Broncos. then it is on to taterskins eagles on sunday night
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 27, 2005, 10:05:08 PM
Quote from: shorebird on October 27, 2005, 09:52:39 PM
This weeks Giants/Skins game is gonna' be good.
so is eagles Broncos. then it is on to taterskins eagles on sunday night
Yeah, it's gonna' be a great two weeks in the NFC East. At least for some team.
Glad to see the real Skins offense is back! :yay
Also, the defense looks great too! Tiki Barber has what? 200 yards on the ground and it's only halfway through the third quarter?
Woohoo. It'll be a good week for those golden nuggets Art dispenses of. :yay
their motto before the game was to split the eagles/gints weeks. so, im sure theyll still be gibbs gobbling.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 27, 2005, 07:48:49 PM
(http://www.taterskins.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/CMAFONDANING/taterskins_8829280PG.jpg)
we're the number two offense in the league bitch
It's almost the 4th quarter and they haven't broke 50 yards of O yet :-D
Hahaha...if they are doing this to the taterskins...wait til they get a hold of the Eagles offense. I think it could be Giants 24 Eagles -21
End of the 3rd Qtr. 36-0 Giants. :-D
Ramsey's replaced Brunell and Ramsey is leading the comeback with a complete pass to Thrash! :-D
1st andgoal from the 9 and they couldn't score with 6 chances. Awesome.
4th and 5 trying to prevent the shutout... False start.
Make that 4th and 10. :-D
Sacked.
I guess you guys are on your way to a 36-0 game as well. :o
Quote from: Jake on October 30, 2005, 05:58:42 PM
I guess you guys are on your way to a 36-0 game as well. :o
The way we're going, we'll be lucky if it's that close. :boom
Ya know...Brunell has to be licking his lips in anticipation of next week. And you know that the 3 man queer brigade will be giving verbal BJ's to Gibbs and Brunell all night.
Eagles got blown out. Not quite as badly as the Skins. That makes me feel a little better.
ok whatever makes you feel better, i am glad we both are fighting for last in the division. :boo
Well the Eagles aren't gonna roll over next week. Y'all may be in last by yourselves after next Sunday. But, at least after that you'll have the Cowboys to fall back into last place.
I think Chris Samuels got hurt today.
Who plays LT next week if he's out, skins fans? Jim Molinaro or Ray Brown?
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on October 31, 2005, 03:56:04 AM
I think Chris Samuels got hurt today.
Who plays LT next week if he's out, skins fans? Jim Molinaro or Ray Brown?
Ray Brown. Molinaro has been deactivated all year. Molinaro had a really good preseason.
I'm a little nervous about my boy Chris if he's not playing.
Brown got pushed on his ass the first play he was in. Farging Umenyora.
Quote from: Jake on October 31, 2005, 08:59:39 AM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on October 31, 2005, 03:56:04 AM
I think Chris Samuels got hurt today.
Who plays LT next week if he's out, skins fans? Jim Molinaro or Ray Brown?
Ray Brown. Molinaro has been deactivated all year. Molinaro had a really good preseason.
I'm a little nervous about my boy Chris if he's not playing.
Brown got pushed on his ass the first play he was in. Farging Umenyora.
Hmm... Jevon Kearse or Ray Brown....who wins that battle??
I cannot wait to read Art's blog. It might just take the sting out of a God-awful football weekend.
Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC on October 31, 2005, 09:14:34 AM
Hmm... Jevon Kearse or Ray Brown....who wins that battle??
The way Kearse has been playing I could lock him up and keep him from getting to the QB.
Could you do it without a can of gasoline?
Quote from: General_Failure on October 31, 2005, 11:38:03 AM
Could you do it without a can of gasoline?
Sure but what would be the fun in that?
Peter King on Merril Hoge... HA HA HA
QuoteMerril Hoge's analysis Sunday morning on the EA Sports NFL Matchup show, highlighting LaVar Arrington playing outside linebacker, inside linebacker and defensive end against San Francisco. Hoge said Arrington was consistently attacking the backfield, and predicted he'd be a big factor against Eli Manning in the taterskins-Giants first-place NFC East matchup. Great illustration of what Arrington brings to a defense, even though he didn't bring it when the Giants nipped the taterskins by 36.
boom
samuels listed day to day will play against eagles
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on October 31, 2005, 07:36:41 PM
samuels listed day to day will play against eagles
You're lucky, because our pass rush has been straight up killer this year.
even though he didn't bring it when the Giants nipped the taterskins by 36.
lol
TO is doubtful?? ;D :-D
i refuse to believe that reno mahe and koy detmer couldnt play every position and still beat the taterskins. they suck.
Quote from: MDS on November 02, 2005, 05:02:44 PM
i refuse to believe that reno mahe and koy detmer couldnt play every position and still beat the taterskins. they suck.
Those are very similar thoughts to what I had going into Dallas.
Gifts for the Gay Washington taterskins Fan
(http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/listmania/list-browse/-/3MIWZWK066TC1/002-2811168-8371224)
just about 24 hours from now the skins will be finishing off their win
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on November 05, 2005, 11:50:45 PM
just about 24 hours from now the skins fans will be finishing off their Gibbs gravy
Eww. Your typing skills leave much to be desired.
(http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=18145&stc=1)
Clever.
I can't wait to hear Arthur and Bubba spinning the loss tomorrow night.
Guess who?
QuoteI've been largely quiet this week for the simple reason there's so little to say. The Giants took us on and whipped us. You leave that game knowing nothing would have really altered the outcome. Sure, we could have caught the nine passes we dropped and continued drives and perhaps closed the final score. We could have made a tackle sooner on some of Tiki's big runs. We could have done enough little things to make the game interesting, but, in the end, you left that contest with certain knowledge they beat us because they were simply FAR better than us on that day.
Emotionally they were super charged and we could not match them in any way. Now we should have that emotion for Philly, but, so should the Eagles in their own turmoil and struggles. The injury to T.O. may actually make them MORE difficult to beat as they may rely more on the running game which while not consistently gutting us this year has CONSISTENTLY produced big plays against us.
You rely on the professionalism and character of a typical Gibbs team to come out in this game more prepared and more ready to win than any game this year and with hope, you win the game, sit at 5-3 and much of the confidence inspired by a good early start lost against the Giants can START to creep back in a little.
The one encouraging thing for me is something Sellers was reported to have said on a television appearance. He indicated he was excited about something Gibbs had altered this week. I mention this only because when Gibbs came back, one of the things guys who played for him kept saying was they often KNEW on Wednesday when the game plan was put in that they were going to win the following week.
How the excitement of the staff and insight of the game plan made them know for certain they couldn't lose. This may be the first time I recall seeing a current player express that type of feeling. For me, that will be the biggest thing to watch as a home win here rights a lot of the haunting memory of the Giants whipping up on us
I'm disappointed in him. he says TO has an injury and seems like he doesn't know that TO was suspended.
Too much time jerkin to the Gibbs ass shots he surely took on the sidelines...
what a douche
I'm disgusted by the silence in this thread.
farg the taterskins and farg their dumbass delusional fanbase.
Quote from: rjs246 on November 06, 2005, 07:39:34 PM
I'm disgusted by the silence in this thread.
farg the taterskins and farg their dumbass delusional fanbase.
What he said....times 1000.
Quote from: rjs246 on November 06, 2005, 07:39:34 PM
I'm disgusted by the silence in this thread.
farg the taterskins and farg their dumbass delusional fanbase.
Amen.
Farg Gibbs...farg the taterskins and farg their farging fans.
You never thought you could be last in the division, never never ever. Enjoy the pit you are in
I'll still laugh at Art sucking off Gibbs until it stops being funny and/or he kills Gibbs for not returning his love.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on November 06, 2005, 11:39:10 PM
You never thought you could be last in the division, never never ever. Enjoy the pit you are in
is the season over?
If the Eagles are in last place at the end of the season then talk shtein. But being in last place at 4-4, 2 games off the leader, with 8 still to play isn't something to brag about.
So put your pecker back in your pants and settle down.
The taterskins will finish the season in last place in the division. Bet on it.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 06, 2005, 11:55:32 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on November 06, 2005, 11:39:10 PM
You never thought you could be last in the division, never never ever. Enjoy the pit you are in
is the season over?
If the Eagles are in last place at the end of the season then talk shtein. But being in last place at 4-4, 2 games off the leader, with 8 still to play isn't something to brag about.
So put your pecker back in your pants and settle down.
The taterskins will finish the season in last place in the division. Bet on it.
i am just saying fact, if you think it is bragging it probably means that it is good for the skins. You are last, no the season isn't over at all but you all never even entertained the idea that other teams in this division could have actually improved
Quote from: rjs246 on November 06, 2005, 07:39:34 PM
I'm disgusted by the silence in this thread.
farg the taterskins and farg their dumbass delusional fanbase.
Delusional?! ??? You got that wrong, the fanbase has been proved correct over the first half of the season. Those stupid homers were the only ones to predict they would have a winning record at this moment. It is all of you who were delusional before the season thinking that the Eagles would roll and the 'Skins would be a pushover, don't take my word for it, check the first 40 pages of this thread.
It's nice to be having the last laugh tonight.
I'm still laughing at you though. So we've got that going for us.
Quote from: General_Failure on November 07, 2005, 12:08:14 AM
I'm still laughing at you though. So we've got that going for us.
Well that's OK, I don't mind that. Isn't it nice that we can all laugh sometimes? :D
Quote from: twatson on November 07, 2005, 12:10:51 AM
Quote from: General_Failure on November 07, 2005, 12:08:14 AM
I'm still laughing at you though. So we've got that going for us.
Well that's OK, I don't mind that. Isn't it nice that we can all laugh sometimes? :D
important to laugh in the hardest of times.
I thought you all were going to the super bowl easy
Nothing's ever as easy as we'd like.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on November 07, 2005, 12:12:26 AM
Quote from: twatson on November 07, 2005, 12:10:51 AM
Quote from: General_Failure on November 07, 2005, 12:08:14 AM
I'm still laughing at you though. So we've got that going for us.
Well that's OK, I don't mind that. Isn't it nice that we can all laugh sometimes? :D
important to laugh in the hardest of times.
I thought you all were going to the super bowl easy
i still take comfort in the face that your team most definately.. is not going to the superbowl, or anywhere near it in the next couple of years.
A Skins fan in a turtleneck slapped me last night. yes, it was a dude. He's lucky I actually wanted to watch the game. But the other 100 Eagles fans in my sction and I made the game a miserable experience for him, having to look over his back every minute, hoping not to get punched. You should have heard us laughing when he slapped me.
Quote from: phattymatty on November 07, 2005, 01:47:06 PM
A Skins fan in a turtleneck slapped me last night. yes, it was a dude. He's lucky I actually wanted to watch the game. But the other 100 Eagles fans in my sction and I made the game a miserable experience for him, having to look over his back every minute, hoping not to get punched. You should have heard us laughing when he slapped me.
farging skins fans. It absolutely kills me that they won last night. I would gladly stab myself in the knee if in exchange the Eagles swept them every year. farging taterskins.
Quote from: rjs246 on November 07, 2005, 01:57:06 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on November 07, 2005, 01:47:06 PM
A Skins fan in a turtleneck slapped me last night. yes, it was a dude. He's lucky I actually wanted to watch the game. But the other 100 Eagles fans in my sction and I made the game a miserable experience for him, having to look over his back every minute, hoping not to get punched. You should have heard us laughing when he slapped me.
farging skins fans. It absolutely kills me that they won last night. I would gladly stab myself in the knee if in exchange the Eagles swept them every year. farging taterskins.
What if you had to stab yourself in the knee every five years instead of just one time?
(http://img47.imageshack.us/img47/8567/deadskins3zx.jpg)
ha!
:-D
oh ma god. :-D
:-D :-D :-D
Quote from: phattymatty on November 07, 2005, 02:17:21 PM
(http://img47.imageshack.us/img47/8567/deadskins3zx.jpg)
Post all the silly images you want but you still lost :-D
Quote from: skin48 on November 07, 2005, 07:47:44 PM
Post all the silly images you want
Thanks for your permission. Really.
(http://www.concretefield.com/uploads/admin/staylor.jpg)
I loved how Reggie Brown ran away from Sean "Ronald McDonald" Taylor (nice socks, douche).
What happened to All-World Big Sean on that one?
Sean can only run the 4.4 40 when he's being chased by someone with a bigger gun.
Look at the scoreboard!!! :-D
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 07, 2005, 07:58:36 PM
I loved how Reggie Brown ran away from Sean "Ronald McDonald" Taylor (nice socks, douche).
What happened to All-World Big Sean on that one?
Gregg Williams said they audibled on the line to go to man coverage but Springs couldn't hear the call on the sideline so he let Brown go as if he was playing zone. That play wasn't Taylor's fault. He did make some poor tackles yesterday though.
Quote from: phattymatty on November 07, 2005, 01:47:06 PM
A Skins fan in a turtleneck slapped me last night. yes, it was a dude. He's lucky I actually wanted to watch the game. But the other 100 Eagles fans in my sction and I made the game a miserable experience for him, having to look over his back every minute, hoping not to get punched. You should have heard us laughing when he slapped me.
(http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/d/d2/262px-Charlie_Murphy.gif) says:
"First of all... you don't slap a man! Aiiight?! Even back in the day, when slappin' was fashionable... it'd be like 'whapow! I challenge you to a duel.' Aiiight... THEY'D HAVE A GUN FIGHT AFTER THAT!"
Look everyone.......it's Darkness. :-D
Two days later, I think the bottom line is that the Eagles and taterskins played about as even a game as can be played, and the breaks (Thrash's fumble, Cooley's fumble, Lewis' "non" catch) all went the taterskins way. It's fine with me for 2 reasons, and 2 reasons alone:
1. The taterskins were at home. I'd expect those breaks to fall our way in our house.
2. The only reason those things mattered was because the Eagles matched up about evenly with the farging taterskins. If, at the midway point through the season, the Eagles prove they are only about as good as the taterskins, there's no Super Bowl XL in our future anyway. Winning and losing becomes unimportant.
Either way, let's just say I'm not laughing at the taterskins for now. They aren't very good, but neither are we.
Quote from: FFatPatt on November 08, 2005, 08:59:32 AM
Either way, let's just say I'm not laughing at the taterskins for now. They aren't very good, but neither are we.
I don't know about that.
The reason I disagree is that every team they have played except Philly has a winning record and yet they are still 5-3. What's more, Philly is .500 so they have not played a single team with a losing record. They also have two wins against teams that are leading their divisions.
According to Sagarin they have played the fourth hardest schedule so far and have two wins against top 10 teams and three against top 16 teams. This team can compete well with the best teams in the league on a consistent basis, they ARE good.
Your definition of "good" is skewed from your many recent years of fielding garbage teams.
Quote from: twatson on November 08, 2005, 12:06:28 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on November 08, 2005, 08:59:32 AM
Either way, let's just say I'm not laughing at the taterskins for now. They aren't very good, but neither are we.
I don't know about that.
The reason I disagree is that every team they have played except Philly has a winning record and yet they are still 5-3. What's more, Philly is .500 so they have not played a single team with a losing record. They also have two wins against teams that are leading their divisions.
According to Sagarin they have played the fourth hardest schedule so far and have two wins against top 10 teams and three against top 16 teams. This team can compete well with the best teams in the league on a consistent basis, they ARE good.
If by "good" you mean not necessarily bottom of the barrel but still nowhere near good enough to win the Super Bowl this year... then yeah, you're good.
http://stupidsuck.com/Host/Sellers.gif
note: note taken.
We tackle good n stuff. Also, you deserve to be laughed at. So haw-haw!
Good for Mike Sellers.
Dawkins "dawkplexing" Cliff Russell
Dawkins "dawkplexing" Coles
Lewis decleating Coles
Josh Parry murdering Shawn Springs
You got 3 more to catch up.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 09, 2005, 12:04:01 AM
Good for Mike Sellers.
Dawkins "dawkplexing" Cliff Russell
Dawkins "dawkplexing" Coles
Lewis decleating Coles
Josh Parry murdering Shawn Springs
You got 3 more to catch up.
Taylor decleating McNabb
Taylor decleating Owens
Whoever gave the concussion to your tight end
some inmate raping taylor up the ass
yea, thats next year.
Quote from: archer on November 09, 2005, 10:23:54 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 09, 2005, 12:04:01 AM
Good for Mike Sellers.
Dawkins "dawkplexing" Cliff Russell
Dawkins "dawkplexing" Coles
Lewis decleating Coles
Josh Parry murdering Shawn Springs
You got 3 more to catch up.
Taylor decleating McNabb
Taylor decleating Owens
Whoever gave the concussion to your tight end
I almost forgot,
The Pinkston "I lost the ball in the lights" incedent is worth atleast 3
Quote from: MDS on November 09, 2005, 10:25:23 PM
some inmate raping taylor up the ass
yea, thats next year.
He'll get off, his lawyer is saying he is actually the victim in this case ::)
yea and ray lewis was innocent too. and oj. and robert blake. and scott peterson. they're all good guys.
Quote from: MDS on November 09, 2005, 10:34:43 PM
yea and ray lewis was innocent too. and oj. and robert blake. and scott peterson. they're all good guys.
These guys have the world by the balls, all they have to do is stay out of trouble and they can't manage to do that, unreal
ahem, 2 to go
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week11atPHI04_McNabbMeetHaley.mpg
(http://extremeskins.com/Eagles05/DSC_0274.JPG)
(http://extremeskins.com/Eagles05/DSC_0275.JPG)
(http://extremeskins.com/Eagles05/DSC_0276.JPG)
(http://extremeskins.com/Eagles05/DSC_0277.JPG)
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on November 09, 2005, 11:10:48 PM
ahem, 2 to go
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week11atPHI04_McNabbMeetHaley.mpg
we won that game moron
Quote from: MDS on November 09, 2005, 11:27:25 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on November 09, 2005, 11:10:48 PM
ahem, 2 to go
http://extremeskins.com/CrazyZeb/Week11atPHI04_McNabbMeetHaley.mpg
we won that game moron
still only 2 HITS behind
taterskin Romes...get lost.
Is a taterskins fan actually trying to argue that his team has put more "big hits" on Eagles players than the other way around, simply because he's taking the time to find the hits on the internet?
Shocker, regardless of how little sense it makes.
Quote from: FFatPatt on November 10, 2005, 08:51:16 AM
Is a taterskins fan actually trying to argue that his team has put more "big hits" on Eagles players than the other way around, simply because he's taking the time to find the hits on the internet?
Shocker, regardless of how little sense it makes.
i did say that we were two away so i don't know how you came up with me saying we had more??
You're obviously the only one playing the game, as I said.
Quote from: archer on November 09, 2005, 10:23:54 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 09, 2005, 12:04:01 AM
Good for Mike Sellers.
Dawkins "dawkplexing" Cliff Russell
Dawkins "dawkplexing" Coles
Lewis decleating Coles
Josh Parry murdering Shawn Springs
You got 3 more to catch up.
Taylor decleating McNabb
Taylor decleating Owens
Whoever gave the concussion to your tight end
Smith gave himself the concussion. He ear-holed Washington on a runnng play and he proceeded to knock himself out.
You run head first into a cinderblock, see how you feel.
Quote from: MadMarchHare on November 11, 2005, 01:05:53 PM
You run head first into a cinderblock, see how you feel.
That's kind of like what Frerotte did when he was on the Skins.
Quote from: archer on November 09, 2005, 10:29:04 PM
Quote from: archer on November 09, 2005, 10:23:54 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 09, 2005, 12:04:01 AM
Good for Mike Sellers.
Dawkins "dawkplexing" Cliff Russell
Dawkins "dawkplexing" Coles
Lewis decleating Coles
Josh Parry murdering Shawn Springs
You got 3 more to catch up.
Taylor decleating McNabb
Taylor decleating Owens
Whoever gave the concussion to your tight end
I almost forgot,
The Pinkston "I lost the ball in the lights" incedent is worth atleast 3
The same Pinkston you laugh at has punked Taylor. Twice.
check out the new bang
Bangcartoon.com
Childs play
i didn't want to post up a thread in the eagles part of the board so i'll put it here, its a good laugh
didnt laugh at all. kinda like the king of queens.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on November 11, 2005, 11:14:05 PM
check out the new bang
Bangcartoon.com
Childs play
i didn't want to post up a thread in the eagles part of the board so i'll put it here, its a good laugh
It was decent up until he started with the McNabb cry baby bit. Didn't make sense, wasn't amusing. Banner reminded my of Mr Burns though, which was funny.
Mr. Important is on another road trip with the team (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=126624)
Quote12:30 p.m., Nov. 12 -- Something's wrong with the damn plane. My first delayed flight in years. All I can think of is I won't get free drinks from Karl and Larry if I'm too late.
Quote2 p.m., Nov. 12 -- Plane is boarded. I'm in first class because I'm pretty and special and deserve it, and because I have a WorldPerks Credit Card. Jack and Ginger all the way to Tampa.
6:45 p.m., Nov. 12 -- Landed in Tampa. Pull out the cell. Message waiting from Larry who says hurry up for drinks and stuff.
7:15 p.m., Nov. 12 -- At the hotel checking in. Problem with my reservation. I'm not in. "I'm with the group." Oh, one s.....yes, yes, sir. You are. Being with the group is kind of cool.
7:30 p.m., Nov. 12 -- At the hotel bar catching up on scores. Meet up with Larry, the PR wonks, and Larry's flunkies drinking cool Guiness. Call TK to tell him to hurry up as I'm here and to call.
7:40 p.m., Nov. 12 -- Get passes from team and head up to room to put them away. Joined by Holdman and Khary Campbell. I'm drinking Guiness and am in taterskin gear so I don't want to scare them off and play it cool. They get off on floor 3.
7:50 p.m., Nov. 12 -- Lonely girl with a hairlip sitting at the bar comes over to our group and starts chatting us up. She informs us the taterskins are here. We play dumb, but not half as dumb as her naturally . She said there are players over there -- and she was right, there were -- and the broadcasters and everyone was there. I was standing with Larry and none of us were letting on that we were the people she was talking about.
Oh yeah, Art. I'm sure the chick was talking about you. :-D
This one should be good. He's getting more big-headed each week.
Barf. (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=126256)
what a douche. i hope his plane crashes.
go skins
(http://extremeskins.com/sigs/TLusby.gif)
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 13, 2005, 11:48:27 AM
Barf. (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=126256)
QuoteDiscuss the taterskins' prospects this season onExtremeSkins.com, the only fan-hosted team message board in the NFL.
Um... no, it's not.
Quote from: FFatPatt on November 13, 2005, 12:40:44 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 13, 2005, 11:48:27 AM
Barf. (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=126256)
QuoteDiscuss the taterskins' prospects this season onExtremeSkins.com, the only fan-hosted team message board in the NFL.
Um... no, it's not.
Ha!
That dude's a freaking tool. He can put titles on his "articles" to try and make them look legit but he's nothing more than a hack-fan writer with an audience full of idiots. If he ever wants to gain some credibility be might want to stop referring to the taterskins as "we". I don't even think Spadaro, who is paid by the Eagles to write good things about them, has ever referred to the team as "we" during any of his articles.
someone get this guy a tissue. its so sad. so sad.
QuoteWrite -- over and over again -- the Alstott 2 point conversion was the worst officiating ever. It was horrible.
National Football League
280 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017
wah wah. losers.
this one ended up topping it
QuoteThis letter is regarding the officiating during the Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs. Washington taterskins game on Sunday, November 13, 2005. I would like to call your attention to the worst call I have ever seen an NFL official make in my lifetime. I am referring to the two point conversion attempt by the Bucs at the end of the game. Please review the game film. Mike Alstotts' elbow is clearly on the ground before the ball gets into the endzone. The play was reviewed, but the referees still missed this obvious call – this can only be indicative of either poor officiating or rigged games. There is no way that an unbiased person views that play, with knowledge of the NFL rulebook, and rules that a converted two-point conversion.
oh ma god. sally, i thought i saw it all.
The Bucs prestigious franchise is such a league favorite.
Dear NFL,
Please ban Chris Simms from playing in the NFL. He is too tuff for us.
:-X
Dear Eagles Fans,
Please stop acting ignorant. In case you have forgotten, the taterskins still have the better team. That's why they beat the Eagles last week.
Thank you.
dear taterskins fans
we dont care. we like watching the skins lose. even if we were 0-16 and the skins won 800 games in a row against the eagles, we would still enjoy watching them lose. especially to zesty qbs like chris simms.
thank you.
Alstott was clearly over the line, it was a pretty obvious call. Stop crying, bitches.
Quote from: mooby on November 13, 2005, 10:48:55 PM
Dear Eagles Fans,
Please stop acting ignorant. In case you have forgotten, the taterskins still have the better team. That's why they beat the Eagles last week.
Thank you.
Dear Loser Foreskin fan,
Farg Off!! Your team blows harder than the wind at Soldier Field!! You have as many losses as us dick!!
Quote from: MDS on November 13, 2005, 10:55:22 PM
dear taterskins fans
we dont care. we like watching the skins lose. even if we were 0-16 and the skins won 800 games in a row against the eagles, we would still enjoy watching them lose. especially to zesty qbs like chris simms.
thank you.
Yup
farg the Skins!!
:-D :-D :-D
I knew those whiny pusses would be crying about the officials on that MB. It is par for the course with those losers.
Dears Skins Fans,
Skins homer and radio host Steve Czaban jut said "quit yer bitchin". He said you not only got lucky on that Betts KOR but you losers couldn't sack or intercept Chris Simms.
I am currently pointing and laughing.
Some updates from Arthur's Tampa blog: apparently the genius is using "Bennigans" as code for going to a titty joint...
QuoteA slicky guy and wife join our humble table as Larry has joined us. She's introduced as Dr. Ashley -- a fairly attractive red-head. I immediately ask about a fictional medical problem. She's a shrink. So, I get into the psychology of calling one's wife from Bennigans instead of "Bennigans". Apparently I'm medically in the wrong according to the doctor. Who knew.
QuoteSlicky guy going a little over board. Seems alternatively interested in touching me or the one female team employee allowed to travel. Slicky guy's wife is shaking him off on the more obvious flirting. Also, she's apparently from a prominent family, but, she wouldn't let him finish his story.
QuoteBar is filled with taterskins fans. Song breaks out. Hail to the taterskins in the middle of Tampa. Less than a half mile from the Bucs Stadium. Lovely. Dr. Ashley lets out a "Go Bucs" cheer which no one joins. We declare all of Tampa officially territory of the Washington taterskins. We own this town. Another Bucs fan is found, but, remains silent to our declaration of ownership. Man, try doing this in Philly.
Quote10 a.m., Nov. 13 -- Meet up with TK for breakfast. Things pretty quiet. Lavar does walk through with three girls and one woman in 56 jerseys. Randy Thomas' mom is in town I think because I complimented her on her "MOM" jersey with his number. Too cute. Karl Swanson swings through and says hi.
No updates since the loss. :-D
I'm gleaning through the 'Screw the refs' post and they've got all these pictures of Alstott's two-point conversion from every conceivable angle...It's like they're deconstructing the Zapruder film. :-D :-D
As much as the refs "hurt" them in this game, they helped them even more against us. We were generally good sports about it and congratulated them on a good game. It's no surprise they aren't doing the same now.
Quote from: Larry on November 14, 2005, 08:28:19 AM
I'm gleaning through the 'Screw the refs' post and they've got all these pictures of Alstott's two-point conversion from every conceivable angle...It's like they're deconstructing the Zapruder film. :-D :-D
You mean this thread? :-D (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=126725)
As you can see by the footage, before the ball crossed the line, Alstott's elbow went 'back and to the left'.
Quote from: FFatPatt on November 14, 2005, 08:33:21 AM
As much as the refs "hurt" them in this game, they helped them even more against us. We were generally good sports about it and congratulated them on a good game. It's no surprise they aren't doing the same now.
Couldn't agree more. I just couldn't bear stooping to their level of stupidity. I still can't see where the ball ever touched the ground on the Lewis catch challenge. ???
Quote from: SD_Eagle on November 14, 2005, 08:39:30 AM
Quote from: Larry on November 14, 2005, 08:28:19 AM
I'm gleaning through the 'Screw the refs' post and they've got all these pictures of Alstott's two-point conversion from every conceivable angle...It's like they're deconstructing the Zapruder film. :-D :-D
You mean this thread? :-D (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=126725)
As you can see by the footage, before the ball crossed the line, Alstott's elbow went 'back and to the left'.
:-D
Back...and to the left
Back...and to the left
Back....and to the left
Yo...they did the EXACT same shtein last year when Dawkins picked off Ramsey in the EZ to seal the victory. There was a HUGE page of the homers posting TV angles, still shots and any other visual "evidence" that they could get.
Anytime those farging crybaby losers get a call against them they start a thread and post the NFL officials in NYC that they should e-mail, stalk, kill.
If I was the Eagles version of a taterskins whiner then I'd be lamenting the piss poor call by Tom White on Greg Lewis' catch.
And I'd be crying about the clock management by the officials that took like 1:00 off the clock and it hurt the Eagles.
taterskin fans = worlds biggest seeping vaginas
So, who is going to come up with the "magic elbow" theory?
In mid air, mind you...
QuoteSlicky guy going a little over board. Seems alternatively interested in touching me or the one female team employee allowed to travel. Slicky guy's wife is shaking him off on the more obvious flirting. Also, she's apparently from a prominent family, but, she wouldn't let him finish his story.
Is he insinuating that slickyguy was making subtle homosexual advances on him? His self-love has no bounds.
Thats what it sounded like to me. :-D
He said he thought slicky and his wife were swingers. :-D
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 14, 2005, 11:28:06 AM
Thats what it sounded like to me. :-D
He said he thought slicky and his wife were swingers. :-D
If they were, there is no way they'd pick Art to be on top/behind either of them. Art would spend the whole time trying to watch himself in the mirror, while saying how hot he looks. :P
But would he have on the Gibbs taterskins hat and replica Motorola headphones? I think he would.
i think i got banned from extremeskins for making fun of some guy who started a "im still proud of the way they played" thread. i called him out on stealing arts thunder, i guess they didnt like that.
Still pointing.
And laughing.
After much anaylsis and a thorough investigation into the call, I have determined in my expert opinion that skins fans are a bunch of douches
(http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/3478/bull9dn.jpg)
:-[ :-[ wah wah
The sweet, sweet irony is that while those fargin' idiots on Extreme Skins bitch and whine about the two-point conversion, there is no way in hell Washington was offsides on the blocked extra point. So, for once, they have a right to bitch and moan about the refs, however, like typical taterskins fans, they are that stupid, they are bitching about the WRONG FARGIN' PLAY! :-D God bless idiot taterskin fans for cheering me up on this truly miserable day.
Ummmm...yes they were offsides.
Quote from: MDS on November 13, 2005, 10:55:22 PM
dear taterskins fans
we dont care. we like watching the skins lose. even if we were 0-16 and the skins won 800 games in a row against the eagles, we would still enjoy watching them lose. especially to zesty qbs like chris simms.
thank you.
Touche.
i also wanted to say that some of the taterskins fans on this board don't like art either. I still go to extremeskins, but i go to other taterskins boards more frequently. I will agree with you guys that there is a bunch of homerism over there. and those articles that art posts on taterskins.com are pretty lame.
Quote from: The Waco Kid on November 15, 2005, 04:19:58 PM
Ummmm...yes they were offsides.
The Bucs dude on the end of the line moves before anyone comes across. I don't think anyone was offsides, but even if they were it should have been a false start on the kicking team.
Quote from: mooby on November 16, 2005, 01:27:09 AM
i also wanted to say that some of the taterskins fans on this board don't like art either. I still go to extremeskins, but i go to other taterskins boards more frequently. I will agree with you guys that there is a bunch of homerism over there. and those articles that art posts on taterskins.com are pretty lame.
Art is a fatter, less professional version of Dave Spadaro.
Quote from: qwert246 on November 16, 2005, 08:47:14 AM
Quote from: mooby on November 16, 2005, 01:27:09 AM
i also wanted to say that some of the taterskins fans on this board don't like art either. I still go to extremeskins, but i go to other taterskins boards more frequently. I will agree with you guys that there is a bunch of homerism over there. and those articles that art posts on taterskins.com are pretty lame.
Art is a fatter, less professional version of Dave Spadaro.
This is true.
Quote from: mooby on November 16, 2005, 01:27:09 AM
i also wanted to say that some of the taterskins fans on this board don't like art either. I still go to extremeskins, but i go to other taterskins boards more frequently. I will agree with you guys that there is a bunch of homerism over there. and those articles that art posts on taterskins.com are pretty lame.
Good news. We can share in our pointing and laughing at Art then.
Quote from: qwert246 on November 16, 2005, 08:47:14 AM
Quote from: mooby on November 16, 2005, 01:27:09 AM
i also wanted to say that some of the taterskins fans on this board don't like art either. I still go to extremeskins, but i go to other taterskins boards more frequently. I will agree with you guys that there is a bunch of homerism over there. and those articles that art posts on taterskins.com are pretty lame.
Art is a fatter, less professional version of Dave Spadaro.
:-D
has that douche finished his stupid blog yet? or he is still crying and weeping from the injustice pulled on the taterskins by the evil, obviously one-sided refs?
Sniff, sniff. We got hosed by the refs...wah...wah. The taterskins will finish 8-8!
Anyone else hear those fans chanting "Eagles suck" at the game?
Well if they're going to be proud of anything this year it may as well be that their team beat a team that couldn't find it's collective ass with both hands and a map.
At least Washington lost to Norv Turner.
And Derrick Burgess won the game for them by sacking Brunell and forcing a fumble on 4th down.
OMG we never should have let him go!!!111
Misery loves company, so here I am. :)
Skins fans think the NFL is rigged now (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=128147)
After the crying about the officials last week this week it is "Are the bookies running the NFL" complaint.
The Vice Prez of Homerism is at it again (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=128026)
Bubba, who is Art's partner in elitism and homerism, is crying about the refs again. And when he's taken to task about the calls being legit, he cries about it.
I knew those turds could give me a good laugh.
If it isn't rigged then why did the Giants get an extra home game? And then why did one owner have to "convieniently" die before the big game against the 'Skins that put them in first place and then the other one kick the bucket before the game this week against another division rival? Tell me that!
Gayness at it's best. ::)
farg the farging taterskins.
Quote from: rjs246 on November 21, 2005, 11:28:20 AM
farg the farging taterskins.
Pretty much sums up the way I feel about the situation.
Although, I would like to add "hard".
Quote from: MDS on November 20, 2005, 09:43:33 PM
I knew those turds could give me a good laugh.
Their misery brings joy to my heart.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 20, 2005, 07:58:28 PM
Skins fans think the NFL is rigged now (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=128147)
After the crying about the officials last week this week it is "Are the bookies running the NFL" complaint.
Even i have to agree that is one of the most retarded statements ever made.
As horrible as our team is, we can attribute our much maligned season to injuries mostly. However, the taterskins have zero excuse for how crappy they are at 5-5. What will be the excuse at the end of the season when they finish 8-8...the NFL is rigged? Ha! ::)
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 20, 2005, 07:58:28 PM
Skins fans think the NFL is rigged now (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=128147)
After the crying about the officials last week this week it is "Are the bookies running the NFL" complaint.
Money, get away.
Get a good job with good pay and you're okay.
Money, it's a gas.
Grab that cash with both hands and make a stash.
New car, caviar, four star daydream,
Think I'll buy me a football team
That person is a d-bag
Quote from: The Waco Kid on November 21, 2005, 05:37:56 PM
As horrible as our team is, we can attribute our much maligned season to injuries mostly. However, the taterskins have zero excuse for how crappy they are at 5-5. What will be the excuse at the end of the season when they finish 8-8...the NFL is rigged? Ha! ::)
crappy?, we are the best we have been in years, sadly it isn't that good
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on November 21, 2005, 05:51:19 PM
Quote from: The Waco Kid on November 21, 2005, 05:37:56 PM
As horrible as our team is, we can attribute our much maligned season to injuries mostly. However, the taterskins have zero excuse for how crappy they are at 5-5. What will be the excuse at the end of the season when they finish 8-8...the NFL is rigged? Ha! ::)
crappy?, we are the best we have been in years, sadly it isn't that any good
farg the taterskins.
what a bunch of fargin babies...
Quotetaterskins | Team again has issues with officials
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:30:55 -0800
Howard Bryant and Jason La Canfora, of the Washington Post, reports Washington taterskins head coach Joe Gibbs sent film from the Week 12 loss to the NFL. Oakland Raiders RB Lamont Jordan was ruled down by contact when he tried reaching for the goal line and the ball came loose. taterskins LB LaVar Arrington said it was a fumble, as did Gibbs, who sent a copy of the film to the league. Gibbs sent film in after the Week 10 loss of Tampa Bay Buccaneers FB Mike Alstott falling short of the goal line on a critical two-point conversion play. The league told Gibbs that they couldn't see it.
Wah wah wah.
the world is out to get them. so unfair.
The taterskins and the Vikings are both at 5-5, and we're at 4-6. I'm laughing at all three teams.
But especially the taterskins, because their fans still have hope.
there arent enough awful things in existence that can happen to taterskin fans
Art:
QuoteHere's an impromptu board rule.
The next -- and every -- person who says we drafted two fullbacks when neither guy played fullback in college and neither guy projects to play fullback in the pros gets banned for sheer idiocy. If you have a problem with the draft at least be honest enough to evaluate the players we got and not the fiction you create.
What an arsehole
:-D i love art
Nehemiah Broughton and Manuel White...what are they...f'ing QBs, Art?!?!
Speaking of our buddy Arthur...
Loser (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=128997)
QuoteThe turkey was dry. You knew it would be. The gravy was tasteless, the stuffing too moist. Someone had the nerve to bring those awful whole cranberries with orange peels in it instead of that canned hunk of cranberry-ish substance you slice and like. Your wife didn't even wait until the turkey was carved to carve out an afternoon walk to the mall with the babies for the good of the children.
Washington writer says TO would look good in Washington...fans react (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=129057)
If you don't throw the ball 70% of the time or have Peyton Manning or Brett Favre at QB, TO will eventually blow up your team.
I really don't want TO in the NFC East for next year's sake, but I do want him in the NFC East for the long-term ass-rapage that the team picking him up would take from his divisiveness.
Quote from: Larry on November 26, 2005, 09:41:42 AM
If you don't throw the ball 70% of the time or have Peyton Manning or Brett Favre at QB, TO will eventually blow up your team.
Remember... that little exclusive club used to include Donovan McNabb.
Quote from: EagleFeva on November 26, 2005, 05:00:22 PM
Quote from: Larry on November 26, 2005, 09:41:42 AM
If you don't throw the ball 70% of the time or have Peyton Manning or Brett Favre at QB, TO will eventually blow up your team.
Remember... that little exclusive club used to include Donovan McNabb.
And Chad Pennington.
It wasn't McNabb, it was Koy.
I am currently pointing and laughing at the taterskins.
As am I.
I am unable to point right now, as my hands are required to hold my sides together because of all this laughing.
The NFL is rigged (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=129259)
hehe
Skins fans make me feel better about myself every single day.
This thread is funny (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=129229)
Quote from: PhillyGirl on November 27, 2005, 05:30:06 PM
The NFL is rigged (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=129259)
hehe
Well, the NFL
did open up that hole for LT's 44-yd run in OT.
im still pointing and laughing
Quote from: PhillyGirl on November 27, 2005, 05:59:21 PM
This thread is funny (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=129229)
Sounds remarkably similar to everything every Eagles fan is saying right now. Ugh.
Big difference.
They say it every single year and can't ever end up over .500 or in the playoffs.
(http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20051127/capt.fdx20211272132.chargers_taterskins_fdx202.jpg)
Aw hell, I got one too. :yay
(http://espn-i.starwave.com/media/apphoto/FDX20111271952.jpg)
QuoteIt goes without saying that we have to beat the Rams...Now...
The Giants/Cowboys loser will be 7-5.
Atlanta goes into Carolina and should lose...they'll be 7-5.
Tampa Bay has 3 straight road games...@ N.O. @ Car @ N.E. Can you say 7-7?
After Dallas plays New York, they host the Chiefs
Minnesota may win the next 2 but finish with Pittsburgh, @ Baltimore, and Chi.
I still think if we finish 2nd in the East, we will make it!
The Rams are all giddy about Fitpatrick quarterbacking them to a come from behind win over Houston....he'll get a rude awakening next week.
Let's just win our next 2 and come home to play Dallas with a 7-6 record!
gibbs' taint tastes good, eh?
QuoteThe fox announcers have every right to laugh at us. The taterskins are the biggest choke team of this season.
:-D :-D :-D
that is some good stuff right there..
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! taterskins Suck!! Losers!!
I love watching the taterskins lose. I hate that team more than any other team and I hate their fans more than any other fans. The Eagles are playing like crap this year, but at least we aren't the taterskins.
After 27 games, Gibbs has the exact same record as Spurrier...11-16.
(http://www.rawpower.co.uk/acatalog/grover_nelsonhaha.gif)
It never gets old to watch the taterskins blow it.
Quote from: Larry on November 28, 2005, 01:08:28 PM
After 27 games, Gibbs has the exact same record as Spurrier...11-16.
What's even more entertaining, is that 2 of their losses came at the hands of coaches they ran out of town, Schottenheimer & Norv Turner.
Skinz solve all problems; lock for playoffs. (http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/football/sns-ap-fbn-fading-taterskins,0,4413277.story?coll=sns-ap-football-headlines)
From this week's TMQ (http://www.nfl.com/news/story/9068316):
QuoteCheer-Babe Professionalism Watch: Though the air was nippy at kickoff of the Bolts-at-Skins game, Washington cheerleaders displayed outstanding professionalism by wearing their two-piece summer numbers; the football gods rewarded the taterskins with the halftime lead. During intermission, the taterskins cheerleaders changed to jackets and velour pants. Indignant, the football gods handed victory to the visitors. Battle-of-the-bods note: Though the taterskins cheerleaders opened the game wearing barely more than bikinis, the teams' four male flag-bearers not only had on comfy-warm tracks suits, two had earmuffs. The men wearing earmuffs while the women wear bikinis is taking gender-norm inequality a bit far even for traditionalists.
Ha. Ha. Ha!
Quote from: Larry on November 28, 2005, 01:08:28 PM
After 27 games, Gibbs has the exact same record as Spurrier...11-16.
(http://www.lockwood.k12.mt.us/library/freivaldswebpagenew/images/laughingboy_001.gif) (http://www.ezthemes.com/previews/s/skinsIV.jpg)
man did gibbs overrate his talent...so much so that he felt comfortable trading two number ones for qb that cant play right now...until they get a competant gm who wont have to share the job with lil danni they arent going anywhere
He's reverted back to last years mega-conservative offensive philosophy. Santana Moss was tearin it up early on but teams caught onto him and started doubling him and disguising coverages and they didn't adjust. Gibbs still runs that bubble screen to him way too much for it to be effective.
And Clinton Portis is a system back. Last year we heard that he wasn't accustom to the Gibbs blocking schemes and that this year he'd be ready to explode. Not seeing it yet, Clint. LIke last years opening day big run against TB Clint's season long run came in week 1 this year. He season long is 41 yards. Not exactly a $50M RB.
I hope the Rams start the Hahvahd guy and he beats the Skins this week. That would be some good pointin and laughin there.
This is from Steve Czaban, a FoxSportsRadio host as well as a local DC radio host and taterskins fan...
QuoteHere's a little quote that jumped right off the page at me. It was from the Post Sunday prior to the Charger game. Gregg Williams commenting on the Skins having to shuffle some personnel in the wake of various injuries on defense. Here's the quote:
"We haven't had Cornelius Griffin, and LaVar we're just getting him back now. I honestly believe that along with Bill Belichick up in New England, we do it the best."
Um, excuse me, but please, stop mentioning the words "New England" in comparison to ANYTHING that this taterskins franchise under Dan Snyder does. This is the third time I've heard somebody at taterskin park compare themselves to the THREE-TIME Super Bowl champs.
So in the words of Ryan Leaf: "Knock it off!"
Really, I mean it. It's embarrassing to you, and insulting to us.
:-D
More from Czaban...I like this guy. :yay
QuoteChargers 23, taterskins 17
Okay. What's left to say? I mean really. We now know exactly what we have this year. This is an utterly NON-playoff caliber team, which struggles to score 21 points on most given weeks (in fact now, 8 of 11 weeks to be exact.)
It has an average defense, that despite a 3-0 advantage in turnovers Sunday, still can't stop the people it needs to stop when it matters. The roster is extremely thin, thanks to having traded 13 draft picks in the last three years, and two more coming this April (our 1st and 4th rounders. Ouch.).
Despite an offensive line that is ENTIRELY healthy, and has two former Pro-Bowlers, and two more high dollar free agents on it, they can't dominate games. Clinton Portis, the highest paid back in franchise history, seldom has breakout games that destroy the will of the opponent.
In fact, what Tomlinson did to the taterskins Sunday, was what Portis used to do in Denver. He hasn't done that but maybe twice since coming here. Funny what getting paid can do to a guy.
Then there's Gibbs. Cover the coach Sunday in a brown paper wrapper and label him "NFL Coach X." Then evaluate how he did calling plays. Anyone and everyone would rip the guy to shreds.
The taterskins had 7 first-and-ten situations in the 4th quarter. Guess how many times they ran Portis? Answer: six. To be that predictable is pure death in the NFL. On back to back possessions, the taterskins went run-run-pass-punt. Repeat.
Then, after a "sent from heaven" INT to give the Skins the ball in prime FG range, they commit a stupid holding call. Okay. Tough break. Deal with it.
What does Gibbs do on 2nd and 14? Runs Portis for no gain. They fail on 3rd down, and miss the 53 yarder.
It was in a word, gutless.
But ooooohhhhh, noooooooo! You can't say that about Joe Gibbs! He's in the HALL OF FAME! "How dare you! You must be a taterskins witch! BURN HIM!"
Here's the only question I want to know right now from fellow taterskin fans. How long does the Gibbs 2.0 "honeymoon" last? No really. I need to know. When is it "okay" to actually JUDGE this coach, on what he is doing on a weekly basis on the sideline to earn his $7 million salary?
Is it never? Can we never judge Joe Jackson Gibbs because he's in the Hall of Fame and gave us three Super Bowl titles in the 80's and 90's?
If you say "yeah, that's right" then I'll just shut up.
But something inside me as a fan says that I DO reserve the right to judge Gibbs in his current performance. I DO have the right to expect the "honeymoon" to end sometime on this comeback and demand quality NFL coaching. I think that I DO as a fan, have a good sense for how a coach is performing in this league, like any other deeply committed fan who has spent hours, and weeks, and months, and years of his life watching and caring about this team.
And just because I want to tell Gibbs "shake yourself, man" then I'm the bad guy? I'm not allowed to say, "Hey, your team is 5-5, at home, in a crossroads game and needs one bullet to #89 to get a sure FG. Stop running the f'ing ball you coward, and have your boy #8 step up and make a play to win the damn game!"
This doesn't mean I want him fired. It doesn't mean I don't "believe" in him. It just means I'm frustrated, fed up, and ready for him to start WINNING games instead hoping they fall into his lap.
He's the guy who has now watched three consecutive 4th quarter leads evaporate into losses. Not me.
End of rant.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I know that I can't be the only taterskin fan, who has become an even BIGGER "Marty Fan" since the General left town.
Here's some food for thought...
- Marty was the last guy to engineer a 5 game winning streak
- Marty was last guy who managed to put the skins on the cover of Sports Illustrated
- Marty drafted well. Fred smoot and Rod Gardner were both voted to various All-Rookie teams. Smoot led the team in picks as a rookie with 5. Gardner was the 2nd leading receiver on the team.
- Marty knew how to use his horses, riding Stephen Davis to a club record 1,432 yards.
- Marty called for discipline and backed it up with sometimes painful consequences. Remember him cutting Larry Centers for not rehabbing his knee at taterskin Park?
- Marty also tidied up the salary cap mess left following the "Fortune 500" fiasco of 2001. Cap room that would be quickly squandered the following winter.
Above all, though Marty Schottenheimer left town with class. I will never forget.. Marty's final impromptu press conference, right there, on the front steps of taterskin Park under a cold steel January sky.
He stood... and answered every question
He did not challenge Snyder's right to fire him
He did not sound bitter.
He did not ask for pity.
He did not lash out.
He did not make excuses.
And to this day, the NEXT deragatory thing you'll hear Marty Schottenheimer say about Dan Snyder, will be the FIRST. Because for a guy who has every right, and plenty of opportunity to say "I told you so" , he hasn't and he won't.
And that my friends, is awfully hard not to respect.
Word.
all very true...but the same thing could be written about reid and be just as real
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 30, 2005, 09:22:39 AM
all very true...but the same thing could be written about reid and be just as real
To an extent, but most Eagles fans don't go around mindlessly slobbing Reid for what he has done previously. In the time Reid has been with the Eagles, this is the first time we've had a season like this. Gibbs has been here going on two years, and fans down here still swear they are a Super Bowl caliber team simply because he is here. There is an unwritten fan/media ban on questioning him, or what he does. It hilarious and sickening at the same time.
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 30, 2005, 09:22:39 AM
all very true...but the same thing could be written about reid and be just as real
I plugged in Reids name everywhere it said Gibbs and the article didnt make much sense.
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 30, 2005, 09:22:39 AM
all very true...but the same thing could be written about reid and be just as real
Are you saying that no one questions Reid's play-calling & coaching?
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 30, 2005, 09:22:39 AM
all very true...but the same thing could be written about reid and be just as real
In relation to the current situation between the Skins and the Eagles there's a big difference in slobbering over someone's jock because of what they did in the last six years than what they did 15-20 years ago. Besides, Gibbs is in the middle of his second suck-arse season out of two in this tenure, Reid is in his first suck-arse season out of seven.
Be fair, this season doesn't suck as much as the first one.
He gets a bit of a pass there, though.
art just had a heartattack
Quote from: MadMarchHare on November 30, 2005, 11:42:16 AM
He gets a bit of a pass there, though.
You know what I mean. ;)
I plugged in Reids name everywhere it said Gibbs and the article didnt make much sense
What does Reid do on 3rd and 1? A twenty five yard sideline route to Pinskton. They fail and have to punt.
It was in two words, god complexic.
But ooooohhhhh, noooooooo! You can't say that about Andy Reid! He's the most games in EAGLE HISTORY! "How dare you! You must be a Eagles witch! BURN HIM!"
Here's the only question I want to know right now from fellow Eagle fans. How long does the Reid seven year "honeymoon" last? No really. I need to know. When is it "okay" to actually JUDGE this coach, on what he is doing on a weekly basis on the sideline to earn his $5 million salary?
At least he comes cheap by comparison.....
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 30, 2005, 12:10:21 PM
What does Reid do on 3rd and 1? A twenty five yard sideline route to Pinskton.
If he called a 25-yard sideline route to Pinkston this season then yes, he probably should be fired.
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 30, 2005, 12:10:21 PM
I plugged in Reids name everywhere it said Gibbs and the article didnt make much sense
What does Reid do on 3rd and 1? A twenty five yard sideline route to Pinskton. They fail and have to punt.
interesting, cause the article talks about handing off on 3rd down and then missing a FG.
The point is that Reid is questioned publicly much more widely in Philly than St. Joe is questioned in Washington.
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 30, 2005, 12:10:21 PM
I plugged in Reids name everywhere it said Gibbs and the article didnt make much sense
What does Reid do on 3rd and 1? A twenty five yard sideline route to Pinskton. They fail and have to punt.
It was in two words, god complexic.
But ooooohhhhh, noooooooo! You can't say that about Andy Reid! He's the most games in EAGLE HISTORY! "How dare you! You must be a Eagles witch! BURN HIM!"
Here's the only question I want to know right now from fellow Eagle fans. How long does the Reid seven year "honeymoon" last? No really. I need to know. When is it "okay" to actually JUDGE this coach, on what he is doing on a weekly basis on the sideline to earn his $5 million salary?
See.. the difference is this. 7 years is not a "honeymoon". 7 years is called "production". 7 years has gotten us 4 straight division titles, 4 NFCCG appearances, 1 SB berth... oh, and the most wins in the history of the franchise. A bad season under Andy Reid is more like the exception than the rule... as it's been since Gibbs has come back and delivered two miserable seasons in DC.
IGY, f*cking relax.
Reid get's a pass on this season even if we win no more games.
It's because owners listen to retard fans like you that teams change coaches every two years and never win.
7 years of hot sex and not doing any dishes or laundry? where do i sign up?!
Quote from: EagleFeva on November 30, 2005, 01:16:23 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 30, 2005, 12:10:21 PM
I plugged in Reids name everywhere it said Gibbs and the article didnt make much sense
What does Reid do on 3rd and 1? A twenty five yard sideline route to Pinskton. They fail and have to punt.
It was in two words, god complexic.
But ooooohhhhh, noooooooo! You can't say that about Andy Reid! He's the most games in EAGLE HISTORY! "How dare you! You must be a Eagles witch! BURN HIM!"
Here's the only question I want to know right now from fellow Eagle fans. How long does the Reid seven year "honeymoon" last? No really. I need to know. When is it "okay" to actually JUDGE this coach, on what he is doing on a weekly basis on the sideline to earn his $5 million salary?
See.. the difference is this. 7 years is not a "honeymoon". 7 years is called "production". 7 years has gotten us 4 straight division titles, 4 NFCCG appearances, 1 SB berth... oh, and the most wins in the history of the franchise. A bad season under Andy Reid is more like the exception than the rule... as it's been since Gibbs has come back and delivered two miserable seasons in DC.
*applauds*
Man, it sure does get quiet in this thread after three straight blown games by the Skins. :-D :yay
archer?
oh my god:
Hey look, were real journalists! (and the back of Jaws' head)
(http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=19175&stc=1)
Look they have a phone! So cool!
(http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=19178&stc=1)
The staff, the bigwigs, the top guys. Art is obvious to point out. :-D
QuoteFrom front (left to right): Henry, Blade and Die Hard
From back (left to right): Art, Om, Tarhog, and Iheartskins
(http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=19180&stc=1%5D)
Quote from: MDS on December 02, 2005, 12:36:40 AM
oh my god:
Hey look, were real journalists! (and the back of Jaws' head)
(http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=19175&stc=1)
Look they have a phone! So cool!
(http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=19178&stc=1)
The staff, the bigwigs, the top guys. Art is obvious to point out. :-D
QuoteFrom front (left to right): Henry, Blade and Die Hard
From back (left to right): Art, Om, Tarhog, and Iheartskins
(http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=19180&stc=1%5D)
OMG! Those Red X's are the Kewlest!!!
Totally. It's like listening to baseball on the radio except that the commentary on the radio actually paints the picture for me. When I see red x's I have to paint the picture myself and all 3 of those pictures keep coming up as Jessica Alba's titty. Great post.
I see the pictures just fine :paranoid
Quote from: MDS on December 02, 2005, 08:03:04 PM
I see the pictures just fine :paranoid
That's b/c they are cached on your CPU.
We don't see shtein.
first one (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=19175&stc=1)
second one (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=19178&stc=1)
]third one (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=19180&stc=1)
does this work, wankers?
Nope.
You have to be a member of that board to view their pics when they link them.
oh. that explains it.
it happens enough as it is
taterskins odds to win the superbowl 150:1
I would put down some money but it is just a waste. Meh, i'll put down 25, that is 3750 if we do somehow by the grace of the football Gods do good.
maybe some of you eagles should put something down.
http://205.134.167.60/lines/lines.cgi?device=browser&site=placemybet&sport=520
If I were going to put money down on the Super Bowl, I'd go...
Giants (28:1)
Panthers (16:1)
or
Patriots (29:1)
I'm going for the Browns or Ravens. :deion
I'm putting a grand down on the Lions and when I win I'm moving to the Bahamas. So long suckaz!
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on December 03, 2005, 10:58:59 AM
taterskins odds to win the superbowl 150:1
I would put down some money but it is just a waste. Meh, i'll put down 25, that is 3750 if we do somehow by the grace of the football Gods do good.
maybe some of you eagles should put something down.
http://205.134.167.60/lines/lines.cgi?device=browser&site=placemybet&sport=520
It's amazing that the Eagles are still 85-1 and the Skins are at 150-1. That shows you how much the world thinks the taterskins SUCK!!!
Quote from: FFatPatt on December 03, 2005, 11:04:04 AM
If I were going to put money down on the Super Bowl, I'd go...
Giants (28:1)
Panthers (16:1)
or
Patriots (29:1)
the best one there i think is the giants one b/c of the low odds combined with what i think are higher chances but i can't bet for the gints
Quote from: The Waco Kid on December 03, 2005, 11:54:52 AM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on December 03, 2005, 10:58:59 AM
taterskins odds to win the superbowl 150:1
I would put down some money but it is just a waste. Meh, i'll put down 25, that is 3750 if we do somehow by the grace of the football Gods do good.
maybe some of you eagles should put something down.
http://205.134.167.60/lines/lines.cgi?device=browser&site=placemybet&sport=520
It's amazing that the Eagles are still 85-1 and the Skins are at 150-1. That shows you how much the world thinks the taterskins SUCK!!!
yeah there is a big difference in odds but they have skins at 15:1 to win the division and eagle at 25:1, i guess they think you guys will do better in the playoffs but have a lower chance of getting there
NFC east championship: http://205.134.167.60/lines/lines.cgi?device=browser&site=placemybet&sport=801
NFC championship: http://205.134.167.60/lines/lines.cgi?device=browser&site=placemybet&sport=521
where will TO play his first game next year. lol http://205.134.167.60/lines/lines.cgi?device=browser&site=placemybet&sport=758
TO will play for the Philadelphia Soul next year. Bet the farm on it.
Ha! Bears are their best bet to make the Super Bowl. What a joke! It's gonna be just like in 2002 when the Bears went 13-3 and then got stomped in their first game at home by the Eagles.
Quote from: The Waco Kid on December 03, 2005, 12:41:31 PM
Ha! Bears are their best bet to make the Super Bowl. What a joke!
The joke is actually your skill in comparing ratios.
Your gayness will not be tolerated.
Quotetaterskins' Bottom Line
By Thomas Boswell
Saturday, December 3, 2005; Page E01
Of the 28 teams in the NFL at the start of '93, how many have won fewer games than the taterskins the last 13 seasons?
Here's a hint. It's possible nobody in the whole Washington area will guess low enough. Although the farther you travel from this city, the more likely you are to get a realistic answer on how bad the taterskins have been and for how long.
The answer: two.
Of the teams that have been in operation for the last 13 years, only the Cincinnati Bengals (71) and Arizona Cardinals (73), two perennial joke franchises of the NFL, teams synonymous with ineptitude, have won even fewer games than the taterskins (85).
Two other clubs also have 85 wins in this period. These teams are the true comparables to the taterskins. Cover your eyes. They're the bag-over-your-head New Orleans Saints and the perennially dismal Detroit Lions, who fired another coach this week.
Let me read your mind. Since you're probably in denial (like me), your first reaction is, "But they're getting better now."
Sorry, they aren't. The taterskins have been even worse in the last four years (.390 winning percentage) than they were in the entire 13-season span (.421). If you're like me, you have to pick your jaw up off the floor after reading these numbers. I dug up this stat because I suspected the taterskins might be surprisingly bad. For the last decade, those who run the team, as well as those who root for it, have lived in a fantasyland, assuming that the team was just a new coach or a couple of players away from contending again. But I never dreamed the taterskins had fallen so far.
Almost everybody in this town, including me, has been judging this team with a warped yardstick for many years. That has ugly consequences. A bad team realizes that it will require considerable improvement just to become mediocre. To reach "good" and "very good," much less "great" is a long-term project. Yet, for at least the last 10 seasons, ever since Norv Turner's '96 team got back above .500 (9-7), Washington has expected that a return to taterskins glory was imminent.
With hindsight, it's fairly clear that the taterskins have never been more than "pretty good" at best since the 1981-92 Gibbs era. However, the team lives and works in a worshipful community that enables its delusions of grandeur. This creates unrealistically high expectations every season. No wonder we've seen years of bizarre behavior and precipitous decision-making.
As an extra twist, the taterskins' owner is perhaps the team's number one lifelong fan. No one believes the taterskins mythology, the conceit that the team is perpetually on the cusp of returning to the top, more than Daniel Snyder. His misperception of his team, viewing the franchise through love eyes like millions of others, has led him to fire coaches and (more important) blow up his entire roster several times. From Norv Turner to Marty Schottenheimer to Steve Spurrier back to Gibbs, the taterskins have never had consecutive coaches whose style of play or preference in personnel bore any resemblance to one other.
The process of seeing the taterskins more clearly and evaluating them in some sane, rather than instant gratification mode, can't start too soon. For example, the taterskins are about to play back-to-back games on the road against teams with losing records -- the St. Louis Rams (5-6) and the Cardinals (3-8). There is, as usual, plenty of misplaced optimism in Washington surrounding these imminent taterskins road adventures. Win these two games against "losers" and, who knows, Washington may be back in the playoff chase. On the fringes. If you squint and the light is just right. (Get out the Bandwagon.)
A reality check may be helpful. Since '92, Washington has played two or more consecutive games on the road 27 times. How often have the taterskins won two in a row away from home? Answer: three times. But they've lost back-to-back on 13 occasions.
Every act in the taterskins' world is measured against the three Super Bowl trophies that sit in the entrance of the team's complex. With time, they have become a curse. The taterskins have set their standards so high that you barely ever hear any reference to the '83 team that went 14-2 and scored 541 points but lost the Super Bowl. It's like they didn't quite measure up.
If few fans grasp how poorly the taterskins have played for the last 13 years, it's also likely that not many have a clear appreciation of just how abnormal the first Gibbs era was. The NFL now has 32 teams. So, on average, a franchise should win a Super Bowl every 32 years. Or roughly three times in a century. Gibbs won three Super Bowls in 12 seasons.
No wonder taterskins Mania has died so hard and done so much damage as it daunts and intimidates subsequent teams. Now, ironically, it is Gibbs himself who must coach in his own shadow and measure up to his own out-sized expectations. Those Gibbs Era memories are distorting our view again -- even of Joe.
Let's look at this '05 season with a different perspective. Under Spurrier in '03, the taterskins won five games and came within three points (or lost in overtime) in five others. They were outscored by 85 points. In other words, if they'd been really lucky, they could have gone 10-6 . Last season, under Gibbs, the taterskins won six games, came within three points in three others and were outscored by only 25 points. If they'd been really lucky, they could have gone 9-7.
This year, the taterskins have already won five games, come within three points (or lost in overtime) in four others and have been outscored by just seven points. If they'd been ridiculously lucky, they might be 9-2 now with five games to play.
This is not called failure. This is called progress.
No, it's not the kind of progress taterskins fans want. The team's 5-6 record is a reasonable measure of how they've played -- usually poorly when it has mattered most. But this season has also showed a new taterskins trait. Except for one game, the team has been competitive every week. And nine of the taterskins' 11 opponents currently have winning records. Not bad.
After narrow defeats the last three weeks, the taterskins, starting with Gibbs, have acted as if their world is a dismal place. On Sunday, they beat themselves up mercilessly with self-criticism, as I've heard them do countless times for many years. How could we lose? What's wrong with us? What'll the fans think? What'll the owner do? We're the taterskins. What a disgrace.
What a load.
Remember, excluding recent expansion franchises, only two teams in the NFL have won fewer games than the taterskins in the last 13 years. The Lions and the Saints are their peers. So, start small. Try to cope with a St. Louis team tomorrow whose starting quarterback will be a rookie from Harvard who was the 250th player picked in the draft and has played in one NFL game.
Sound easy? It won't be. Cut 'em some slack. After all, they're only the taterskins.
Pointing, and laughing.
Bestest article EVAR!!
Quote6:20 p.m., Saturday, Dec. 3 -- Team begins to arrive. Some going directly up to the second floor to get their room keys. Bugel walks by to the elevators. We give him a thumbs up.
tool
Well, we know now within a shadow of a doubt that the Rams really suck.
Some more "highlights" from Arthur...
Quote4:40 p.m., Saturday, Dec. 3 -- Rick calls to say he's arrived. I turn the rental around to get the young boy.
Quote5:15 p.m., Saturday, Dec. 3 -- Airport security spots my taterskins sweats and we begin talking about how hopeless the Rams are.
Quote5:30 p.m., Saturday, Dec. 3 -- We arrive in high style at the Ritz here in St. Louis. For the first time in my life I actually feel tacky for being in sweats. Like in the Sopranos, Rick and I enter the hotel to see a bride being photographed. We're the first people "with the team to arrive" which totally confounds the Ritz crew. We are unable to get our room keys at the front desk. They call to the second floor and escort us up.
Ah, there's the old "remind everyone I'm important" thing...
Quote6:15 p.m., Saturday, Dec. 3 -- Call Larry Michael to tell him the hotel has a cigar bar.
Betcha that was an enthralling conversation!
Quote6:35 p.m., Saturday, Dec. 3 -- Mike Sellers and Joe Salave'a sit at the table next to us. Waitress goes to Sellers allowing me to make comment, "Punch him in the ribs. He likes that." Nice big grin from Sellers on that
That's the ol' "who the hell is this douchebag talking to me" smile.
QuoteWill update in a bit, but, much of the REST of the night is unable to be told here. Within the story I will tell though is how I was hitting on the bartenders with the assistance of a taterskins coach (to be unnamed ) and as we departed, having that bartender say, "Bye Art. Sensual Pisces." Witnesses can verify. Seems she's into astronomy and apparently Pisces are hot, hot, hot
:-D :-D
Art makes Dave Spadaro look like a Pulitzer winner.
What a fargin douche.
Pointing and laughing at the Skins for employing him.
QuoteWill update in a bit, but, much of the REST of the night is unable to be told here. Within the story I will tell though is how I was hitting on the bartenders with the assistance of a taterskins coach (to be unnamed ) and as we departed, having that bartender say, "Bye Art. Sensual Pisces." Witnesses can verify. Seems she's into astronomy and apparently Pisces are hot, hot, hot
even if he had said the correct word...
astrology...he would still be a total retard
I'm the coach he didn't name was totally messing with him, saying to his friends, "Look, I'll bet you I can make fat-ass Art think he's a lady magnet. Who's in for $5?"
(http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c233/finstinct/brilliant.jpg)
yup
taterskins fans are suggesting that their team never deserves being booed, eh? Really?
Skins fans ALWAYS boo their team! :-D :-D :-D
Hypocrisy is in the air.
Quote from: MDS on December 06, 2005, 03:58:26 PM
(http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c233/finstinct/brilliant.jpg)
yup
Damn straight. The fact that taterskins fans think that booing their own team is morally reprehensible just goes to show what a bunch of fargwits they are.
Art finished up his thrilling blog
Quote6:45 p.m., Saturday, Dec. 3 -- Group heads to hotel cigar bar. Sonny, Larry, TK, myself, the .COM TV guys initially, joined by PR, Louis Riddick and Terry Ray (Pro Scouts) joined us. I am the big man on campus so I hand out cigars, assuring a comfortable spot as "the man" the rest of the night.
dork
Quote8 p.m., Saturday, Dec. 3 -- Outsider wants to be included more and more. I explain I'm not really with the team. I'm just a fan they can't stop making hang out with them. He called me, "The taterskins booster club" the rest of the night. Not too far off that . He kept asking me if it was ok if, "Could I talk to your friend there?" My friend, of course, one Sonny J.
everyone envies you. you are so cool. you know sonny. oh my god. i bow down to your shrine.
QuoteThe other not so cute, but more engaging and larger breasts. The, "Guys must hit on you all the time," question comes out quick to both. I jump in with my best line of all time back when I was a kid. At a bar I approached a student there and asked, "What's your sign?" I was drunk and had intended to branch off from this standard approach, but, one of my buddies dared me to ask it, as he probably KNEW she didn't like it. Anyway, she looked at me and said, "Before I tell you, tell me what yours is." I said, "Pisces." She said, "That's why you smell so bad." She was pretty quick on her feet. I was a hair more quick, adding, "Yeah, but, I taste great." This made the larger-chested bartender smile and discuss the sensual nature of the Pisces. Something about being the best lovers.
I just threw up.
QuoteHead back to the Ritz with the .Com TV guys with the wishful wave of the bartender and comment, "Bye Art. Sensual Pisces." Her dreams will be filled with the Art tonight.....Have breakfast. Behind me are some high-level taterskin execs talking about THIS site. One is lamenting the fact we don't let them use pop-ups. I just laughed to myself.
everyone wants a piece of art and extremeskins. they are so cool.
QuoteOnly Brunell and Ramsey are on the field. Hall is over there too. The field is this weird soft artifical shag. It feels slippery. The stadium just feels wrong being inside like this. We run into Larry and the .COM TV guys where we try to count up how much we drank the night before. We stop counting as it is too hard.
stop bragging about getting smashed the night before, tool. nobody cares.
QuoteGibbs presser -- Gibbs finishes his press conference which was a long one because we won . As he's walking out I thank him and congratulate him on the win. He does a double take, then again, not really remembering ME individually so much as I represent a fan site, he reached out to me to grab my hand and thanked me for everything WE do. "You guys really mean a lot. Thank you." The coaching staff really knows who we are here better than the players. It was nice to see.
clean up on aisle 4, art just blew a load
Oh my. That is incredibly gay.
He's the biggest tool on the internet right now. Maybe ever.
right up there.
is that guy for real?
Art looks to be a lock for the Pulitzer with his newest article. This was my favorite line:
QuoteI grabbed Rock Cartwright as he was coming off the field after his finest game as a professional running back, thanking him for the effort. I tried joking with him about his devoted following at ExtremeSkins as I thought he'd probably be pretty euphoric. Instead, he was all business, telling me it was a good win, but, just a win and this team needs to go out and keep proving itself.
Imagine what Cartwright was really thinking when Sasquatch started feeling him up?
Yeah, like Rock Cartwright gives two shteins about some cult following on an internet message board. :-D
Art is the biggest jackoff ever. I'm telling you...he's that guy on theNFLShop commercials who hides in the dirty jocks bin so he can sniff them and then steal merchandise.
And without reading ExtremeHomers lately I bet the "all business" line was met with man-love for Gibbs for having the team focused and all that stuff.
(http://www.taterskins.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/MHAIGGPFGMJB/taterskins_9000836PG.jpg)
Wow, it's a picture of ... well, nothing really. Wow.
I see some of the shine on Mark Brunell's star has faded. Now that teams are all over Santana Moss like glue Brunell (and Gibbs) are predictable as hell. But I think they've unlocked a secret weapon in Robert Royal. Man, how did that awesome TE go unnoticed for so long?!? He's targeted a lot by Brunell.
If it weren't for Antonio Brown, a guy who The Genius himself cut after week 1, the Skins would've lost to the Cruds.
The taterskins will get bounced REALLY fast if they manage to make the playoffs... which they won't anyway.
The taterskins don't lose. They get cheated, but they never lose.
I think the last two wins are great. Let their fans be strung along again into believing the Skins are contenders. It makes the kick to the balls they get each year when they don't make the playoffs all the more vicious. I'm all for it. :yay
Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC on December 12, 2005, 03:15:29 PM
I think the last two wins are great. Let their fans be strung along again into believing the Skins are contenders. It makes the kick to the balls they get each year when they don't make the playoffs all the more vicious. I'm all for it. :yay
yeah there always is a minimal chance for us to make the playoffs and then we are all left in the dust. Last year we were 3-8 and there still was a shot at making the playoffs if we won our last 5 as long as somethings fell into place. Well the things fell into place but the skins only won 3, had they won 5 they would've been in
For taterskins fans, there's always a chance. Reality be damned!
Quote from: rjs246 on December 12, 2005, 06:28:19 PM
For taterskins fans, there's always a chance. Reality be damned!
Yeah. Reality
and Heterosexuality! HA! Har har. ^-^
A pinned thread at ExtremeSkins on how to make noise at the stadium (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132043)
Are you kidding me? You have to pin a thread that teaches you how to make goddamn noise?!?!
Silly children.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on December 13, 2005, 02:23:57 PM
A pinned thread at ExtremeSkins on how to make noise at the stadium (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132043)
Are you kidding me? You have to pin a thread that teaches you how to make goddamn noise?!?!
:-D
Pathetic
"They really appreciate the fans, guys"
Art is going to the DTC tailgates. For the love of god, take pictures.
QuoteThe crowd needs to help win this game. It has to be fevered from the start. No let up. I'll be there. DTC and ES tailgates, have the booze ready .
its gonna be hard to make noise when half the stadium is cowboy fans
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y256/Ashlo1/52286185.jpg)
HOLLA
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y256/Ashlo1/d12f06d0.jpg)
They're so tuff they let our fans steal beer from them and laugh in their face :-D
check out the dude in the back with the jason mask. so farging cool.
Quote from: SD_Eagle on December 13, 2005, 03:56:12 PM
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y256/Ashlo1/52286185.jpg)
By the looks of that cone, they got actual players to sign it.
"Hey, Lavar, could sign my cone? No..I don't have a girlfriend.....how did you know?"
Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC on December 13, 2005, 04:12:01 PM
By the looks of that cone, they got actual players to sign it.
There's a bunch of sigs on that thing, my guess is they're forged:
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y256/Ashlo1/91ba31cd.jpg)
Quote from: SD_Eagle on December 13, 2005, 04:24:47 PM
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y256/Ashlo1/91ba31cd.jpg)
"Here dude, chug this beer when I dump it down the cone! Then I'll put my meatcicle in it and you can chug on that as well! Yay! Polesmoking is terrif!"
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on December 13, 2005, 02:23:57 PM
A pinned thread at ExtremeSkins on how to make noise at the stadium (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132043)
Are you kidding me? You have to pin a thread that teaches you how to make goddamn noise?!?!
:-D
Next week: Chaw and the art of walking.
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y256/Ashlo1/91ba31cd.jpg)
And see... here I was just this morning wondering what ever happened to Gary Clark.
Art & The DTC = hours of entertainment.
I'd love to know how many times he flaunts the fact that he is boys with Sonny, Larry and all of those other ol boys?
As bad as this season gets, at least I can get some amusement from these losers.
just to change things up for the day, i decided to laugh and point at the taterskins, instead of point and laugh.
Quote from: Wingspan on December 14, 2005, 10:02:05 AM
just to change things up for the day, i decided to laugh and point at the taterskins, instead of point and laugh.
Did it hurt? That sounds way too dangerous for my tastes.
The DTC is a joke, and an embarressment to taterskins fans everywhere. The fact that Art tries to hang out and be cool with them speaks levels about what his standards are for friendship.
We point and laugh at the DTC the same way you laugh at the trashman or the dirty 30.
They don't represent me any more than this guy represents you.(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a256/qwert246/Egals%20Suck%20Ritchie%20Kotites%20Sack/idiotshoulderpadgoof.jpg)
So let's all point and laugh together. Then point and laugh at each other.
DALLAS WEEK
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
(http://www.bodybagcatholic.com/images/d/fingerpointing.jpg)
:-D
I hope the stadium gets napalmed in a tactical strike.
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
we want you to lose
Be careful what you wish for, Foreskinbaueuer.
I think Dallas might be a little more than you can handle these days.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on December 15, 2005, 11:54:29 PM
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
WE WANT DALLAS!
YOU'RE A RETARD!
YOU'RE A RETARD!
YOU'RE A RETARD!
YOU'RE A RETARD!
YOU'RE A RETARD!
Quote from: rjs246 on December 14, 2005, 10:18:00 PM
I hope the stadium gets napalmed in a tactical strike.
Well, the Skins secondary is going to get burned often - close enough?
All thos tips to make noise have really paid off, you can hear them all groan in disappointment every time a pass is dropped.
yeah they must've, seeing as how loud it was today. 35-7, crushing. Phillip daniels had 4 sacks against their crappy left tackle. Do you even know how many false start penalties they had because of how loud the crowd noise was?
No, and I don't care.
Thats it. The taterskins are going to the Superbowl. I have been convinced with their beatdown of Hall of Fame bound Drew Bledsoe and Marion Barber. Wow.
Man oh man, you guys were so right. The taterskins are horrible, and the Eagles are a lock for the playoffs once again, just like every one of you blind sheep projected.....how wrong it was to doubt you.....
Do you realize, in the harsh light of the bitter aftermath, that the Eagles "glory years" that you've all crowed so much about over the past few years consist of 3 blown NFC title games and a Super Bowl beatdown?? Pathetic.
Just watch my prediction unfold. Skins come into Philly in a win and get in situation, against the lowley Eagles who are probably gonna start Koy Detmer, and get beat and miss the playoffs. Oh, it would be like winning the Superbowl of the offseason, something the taterskins seem to every year.
Quote from: absinthe1023 on December 19, 2005, 12:31:50 AM
Man oh man, you guys were so right. The taterskins are horrible, and the Eagles are a lock for the playoffs once again, just like every one of you blind sheep projected.....how wrong it was to doubt you.....
Do you realize, in the harsh light of the bitter aftermath, that the Eagles "glory years" that you've all crowed so much about over the past few years consist of 3 blown NFC title games and a Super Bowl beatdown?? Pathetic.
I love how they are wow o wow you beat the cowboys when they couldn't do that. the eagles are a joke and have been laughed at ever since
http://rapidshare.de/files/2788051/EaglesSBhighlights.mpg.html
(o watch the video go to free on the bottom then watch the timer on the next page, it is 30 seconds and then type in that security code and you are good to go)
I can't wait till new years
mmhmm. i see. good point. i bow to joe gibbs.
Pointing. Laughing. Rinse. Repeat.
Two fag taterskins losers giving each other verbal blowjobs because they beat a crappy NFC team. Way to go losers!
But but but but the Eagles got smoked by them. That means the taterskins are a gazillion times better than the Eagles Their lives have been validated by this momentous win!
Congrats on beating the Cowboys.
You're still not going anywhere.
I guess this was the big game that gives taterskins fans hope.
Watch them lose to the Giants by 30+ again next week.
Quote from: General_Failure on December 19, 2005, 04:31:43 AM
But but but but the Eagles got smoked by them. That means the taterskins are a gazillion times better than the Eagles Their lives have been validated by this momentous win!
You know this was a big win. It keeps them in the playoff hunt. They win head to head tiebreakers with everyone except Tampa. Any divisional game is big, and they are 3-1 in the East.
taterskins will finish their typical 8-8 9-7 disapointment...miss the playoffs...and still not have a high first round pick
oh yeah they dont have ANY first round pick this year
Quote from: ice grillin you on December 19, 2005, 11:26:03 AM
taterskins will finish their typical 8-8 9-7 disapointment...miss the playoffs...and still not have a high first round pick
oh yeah they dont have ANY first round pick this year
that was to move up and get Jason Campbell, right?
Quote from: ice grillin you on December 19, 2005, 11:26:03 AM
taterskins will finish their typical 8-8 9-7 disapointment...miss the playoffs...and still not have a high first round pick
oh yeah they dont have ANY first round pick this year
That Jason Campbell's gonna be one heckuva QB though :-D
Quote from: ice grillin you on December 19, 2005, 11:26:03 AM
taterskins will finish their typical 8-8
That's assuming an Eagles win over them.
Quote from: ice grillin you on December 19, 2005, 11:26:03 AM
taterskins will finish their typical 8-8 9-7 disapointment...miss the playoffs...and still not have a high first round pick
oh yeah they dont have ANY first round pick this year
Did anyone else see that fat piece of slop Tony Stewart standing on the taterskins sideline last night?
He looked more astonished by what was going on than St. Joe did.
:-D
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on December 19, 2005, 11:33:28 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on December 19, 2005, 11:26:03 AM
taterskins will finish their typical 8-8 9-7 disapointment...miss the playoffs...and still not have a high first round pick
oh yeah they dont have ANY first round pick this year
Did anyone else see that fat piece of slop Tony Stewart standing on the taterskins sideline last night?
He looked more astonished by what was going on than St. Joe did.
:-D
Since I never have watched any NASCAR, I actually wondered if that was Art.
The best thing about that game was at the end when they were playing "Mama don't let your babies grow up to be Cowboys." That was farging hilarious. Even when Gibbs made them stop (why?), the crowd continued to sing it.
I hate to ever give the Deadskins credit, but that is hilarious.
Quote from: Tomahawk on December 19, 2005, 12:47:28 PM
The best thing about that game was at the end when they were playing "Mama don't let your babies grow up to be Cowboys." That was farging hilarious. Even when Gibbs made them stop (why?), the crowd continued to sing it.
I think it might have been while the play clock was running, and not during a stoppage. Not sure, but it might be considered an unfair act. It didn't matter, the game was over. When they played the song, they showed a graphic on the jumbotron of a blue star stuck in the ground, swept into a dustpan and thrown in the trash. :-D
(http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c231/therealjbird_/PRICELESS.jpg)
(http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=19715&stc=1) :yay
Is it just me, or does Meshaun look a little like The Crack Smoker..........I mean Playmaker, Michael Irvin?
:-D
Good pic
Super Fans at TheHogs.net already scared and complaining about coming to Philly to see the game.
Philly fans is mean mommy! I r skerred! :'(
(http://www.thehogs.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17168)
QuoteIf you go your a fool, I went to school in Northeast Pa. and the Eagles fans will hurt you. There is a difference between being a fan and being stupid. What your doing is being stupid, I would never go to Philly and root for the opposing team, in any sport, not just football.
:-D
Eagles fans: The Urban Legend of the NFL >:D
Quote from: Geowhizzer on December 22, 2005, 10:08:52 AM
QuoteIf you go your a fool, I went to school in Northeast Pa. and the Eagles fans will hurt you. There is a difference between being a fan and being stupid. What your doing is being stupid, I would never go to Philly and root for the opposing team, in any sport, not just football.
:-D
Eagles fans: The Urban Legend of the NFL >:D
I laugh at fans that talk like him. Unless you act like total fargnut at the game, the worst you get is a a-hole chant & occasional soft pretzel thrown your way.
Quote from: Beermonkey on December 22, 2005, 11:20:33 AM
Quote from: Geowhizzer on December 22, 2005, 10:08:52 AM
QuoteIf you go your a fool, I went to school in Northeast Pa. and the Eagles fans will hurt you. There is a difference between being a fan and being stupid. What your doing is being stupid, I would never go to Philly and root for the opposing team, in any sport, not just football.
:-D
Eagles fans: The Urban Legend of the NFL >:D
I laugh at fans that talk like him. Unless you act like total fargnut at the game, the worst you get is a a-hole chant & occasional soft pretzel thrown your way.
i guess you never got salt in your eyes before. :-[
Quote from: Beermonkey on December 22, 2005, 11:20:33 AM
I laugh at fans that talk like him. Unless you act like total fargnut at the game, the worst you get is a a-hole chant & occasional soft pretzel thrown your way.
I don't know dude. I've seen opposing fans get punked a lot worse than a pretzel being thrown their way. I once saw a Skins fan go into a porta potty and get the whole thing tipped over while he was in there. Came out with piss, shtein, and that blue stuff all over him.
Quote from: phattymatty on December 22, 2005, 02:32:48 PM
Quote from: Beermonkey on December 22, 2005, 11:20:33 AM
I laugh at fans that talk like him. Unless you act like total fargnut at the game, the worst you get is a a-hole chant & occasional soft pretzel thrown your way.
I don't know dude. I've seen opposing fans get punked a lot worse than a pretzel being thrown their way. I once saw a Skins fan go into a porta potty and get the whole thing tipped over while he was in there. Came out with piss, shtein, and that blue stuff all over him.
I know how bad it was & how bad it can get, it's just that it isn't as bad as it used to be unless you're a total dickhead. I remember seeing a Rams fan get his jaw broken because he was walking around the Vet taunting the fans during the 2001 regular season game.
Too bad that Skins fan in the potty wasn't a DTC member. :-D
I drove by both FedEx and Lincoln Financial today. Linc > FedEx. Landover sucks my balls.
That is all.
Quote
Too bad that Skins fan in the potty wasn't a DTC member. :-D
i agree with you on this one. DTC fans are the worst. They give all taterskins fans a bad name. They need to take their homo thug asses back to the mean streets of wherever the hell they came from.
Potomac? I've been there, yea, real tough.
i was thinking more along the lines of the mean streets of Malibu.
Quote from: mooby on December 22, 2005, 11:05:32 PM
Quote
Too bad that Skins fan in the potty wasn't a DTC member.
i agree with you on this one. DTC fans are the worst. They give all taterskins fans a bad name. They need to take their homo thug asses back to the mean streets of wherever the hell they came from.
They're from Burke and Vienna. Two of the richest neighborhoods in one of the richest counties in the country. They should be shot.
I hate Northern VA/DC area so much more than ever right now. I'm taking 97/3/301 home from Philly after the holidays. The Beltway sucks big fat hairy sack, as does everything near it. Especially FedEx field, which sucks ass. Oh, and the Woodrow Wilson bridge can kiss my hairy white ass. OH MY FARGING GOD do I hate that whole area.
EAT ME, D.C.!!
can you see fed ex from the beltway?...i didnt think you could
Quote from: FFatPatt on December 23, 2005, 08:50:10 AM
I hate Northern VA/DC area so much more than ever right now. I'm taking 97/3/301 home from Philly after the holidays. The Beltway sucks big fat hairy sack, as does everything near it. Especially FedEx field, which sucks ass. Oh, and the Woodrow Wilson bridge can kiss my hairy white ass. OH MY FARGING GOD do I hate that whole area.
EAT ME, D.C.!!
Ha. Next time just stop and pound a few drinks in Arlington to break up the trip. At least that way you'll get to appreciate the one thing that DC has over most other cities. Hot women. And lots of them.
Also, Stab a taterskins Fan Day is every day there! Can't beat that.
Yes, IGY, you can absolutely see it from the Beltway.
Thanks for the advice, rjs. I may just do that next time.
Quote from: FFatPatt on December 23, 2005, 08:50:10 AM
I hate Northern VA/DC area so much more than ever right now. I'm taking 97/3/301 home from Philly after the holidays. The Beltway sucks big fat hairy sack, as does everything near it. Especially FedEx field, which sucks ass. Oh, and the Woodrow Wilson bridge can kiss my hairy white ass. OH MY FARGING GOD do I hate that whole area.
EAT ME, D.C.!!
Yeah, what farging idiot thought it was a good idea to put a drawbridge on the busiest farging highway in the country? Idiots.
Yeah, what farging idiot thought it was a good idea to put a drawbridge on the busiest farging highway in the country?
the same one who also put S curves on it
My Plan is working
congrats you get to play the taterskins usual role of upset
Beware scramblin' Mike Mc.... yeah, can we count the point spread in this one?
Quote from: General_Failure on December 24, 2005, 07:53:09 PM
Beware scramblin' Mike Mc....
You talking to us or the Skins fans? :paranoid
Whichever GM is stupid enough to think he's a diamond in the rough after we dump him.
just a quick reminder that mikey mc was the only free agent signing the eagles made last year...wtf?
They did better with pickups made during the season. That would be Gordon, McCants, Landeta, and Cortez.
YIKES.
(http://www.taterskins.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/MEABAGODHNDP/56486018PG.jpg)
santa moss is comming to town.... well running to your town
he knows when your sleeping, he knows when your awake. Allen was sleeping 160 and 3 TDs
hE's gOOd!
looks like you may have to deal with those little things on the bottom of the screen next week that says. Clinton portis breaks the taterskins all time single season rushing record(needs like 26) and soon there after Moss breaks the taterskins single season receiving record (needs 37).
THen if you are really unlucky.
Clinton portis breaks 1500 yards 3 of his first 4 years(needs 96 yards)
Santa Moss breaks 1500 yards for the first time in his career(needs 100 yards)
Moss is NFL's leading receiver(Currently number 2: 32 behind Steve Smith, 23 Ahead of Chad Johnson, The arizona boys are about 65 behind moss(No thanks to you guys))
Mark Brunell throws for 30000 yards in his career(needs under 150)
;D
Brunell ain't playin!
Oh man, this is perfect. Everyone associated with the taterskins probably thinks they're going. And then, Mike McMahon will have his one shining moment and beat them. Or not. But still, this was the only thing I had left to root for once McNabb went down. And here it is.
Quote from: The Waco Kid on December 25, 2005, 02:11:00 AM
Brunell ain't playin!
yeah maybe not, i hope he does but it might be best to not risk it. See we try to protect our QBs when they are hurt. :-D
Arthur J Gibbslover was found dead this morning. The report says he drowned himself in man gravy. His pants were down, but testing will be required to know if it was his own juices that did him in.
Well, at least MDS's scenario is still alive and well. Obviously Andrew Hall will not start and win, but Terrible Mike will start and I hope knock the Skins out of the playoffs. It ain't looking good, but I will hope like hell that this defense can stop them a few times and get a score because we know the offense won't.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on December 25, 2005, 05:07:44 AM
Well, at least MDS's scenario is still alive and well. Obviously Andrew Hall will not start and win, but Terrible Mike will start and I hope knock the Skins out of the playoffs. It ain't looking good, but I will hope like hell that this defense can stop them a few times and get a score because we know the offense won't.
just like 2002
Going to the game sunday in philly, picked up tickets off ebay right behind the skins bench. the eagles fans are unloading tickets like mad. Brunell or Ramsey, it does'nt matter, time for a good ol' fashion butt whoopin!!
Exactly the mentality I want you idiots to have.
Quote from: MDS on December 25, 2005, 12:23:43 PM
Exactly the mentality I want you idiots to have.
i know a lot of taterskin fans that comming into the last 5 we had to win were most scared of this game. Even before the giants game we were more worried about this game. We feel good about home games and our other two away games were the rams and arizona which are pretty easy... but i guess the cards weren't that easy for you.
Don't worry the skins won't be sleeping on you. If we pull off an early lead i think you guys just might give up
Quote from: ice grillin you on December 24, 2005, 10:55:03 PM
just a quick reminder that mikey mc was the only free agent signing the eagles made last year...wtf?
Two words: Brutal
(http://www.taterskins.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/GNMFMDAAGLAC/taterskins_8899019PG.jpg)
(http://www.taterskins.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/GNMFMDAAGLAC/taterskins_8899090PG.jpg)
(http://www.taterskins.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/OABGPJEAGLAC/taterskins_8899133PG.jpg)
posing by kicking dawkins in the face for the snap shot during the TD
woopdedo were not any good
(http://www.taterskins.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/KIHAFJKAGLAC/_E7T2788PG.jpg)
Quote from: MDS on December 26, 2005, 05:21:16 PM
woopdedo were not any good
this thread is WAY to quiet for a game this week. You can upset us and keep us out of the playoffs for yet another year(i think it would become the longest drought in the nfl with cinci getting in) and we have the opportunity to do just the opposite
See this bullshtein has to stop
http://www.nflshop.com/nfl/index.jsp?pageId=nflProductDetail&Slot1.atgProductId=4612212&SlotId1=guym1300004&templateId=searchResultPage&sellable=true
the giants... farging giants are already claiming the division... the farging giants. this is an embarrassment that they lead this division
I would gladly see the Giants win the division every year for the next decade if it meant another ten years of the Skins missing the post season.
I second that. Skins fans seem in doubt of the hatred we have for them. I don't care if you are a reasonable, likeable fan or a charter member of the dtc: if you root for the washington taterskins, i hate you.
Ten years of a Manning lovefest is pretty revolting, but seeing Gibbs get canned might just be worth it.
everyones seasons over as soon as the colts begin the post season. might as well just start plannin for next year. even if you win this game, your not going anywhere.
Quote from: The Waco Kid on December 25, 2005, 02:11:00 AM
Brunell ain't playin!
Making things up. He's day to day.
MRI showed no swelling or muscle damage. It's a Grade I sprain.
Quote from: MDS on December 25, 2005, 02:17:57 AM
Oh man, this is perfect. Everyone associated with the taterskins probably thinks they're going. And then, Mike McMahon will have his one shining moment and beat them. Or not. But still, this was the only thing I had left to root for once McNabb went down. And here it is.
Holy shtein.
Put down the crack pipe.
McMahon's one shining moment?
Cause he looks great so far. Just ready to break out.
This game will not be close. It's good to hope and all, but seriously...
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on December 25, 2005, 01:08:25 AM
looks like you may have to deal with those little things on the bottom of the screen next week that says. Clinton portis breaks the taterskins all time single season rushing record(needs like 26) and soon there after Moss breaks the taterskins single season receiving record (needs 37).
THen if you are really unlucky.
Clinton portis breaks 1500 yards 3 of his first 4 years(needs 96 yards)
Santa Moss breaks 1500 yards for the first time in his career(needs 100 yards)
Moss is NFL's leading receiver(Currently number 2: 32 behind Steve Smith, 23 Ahead of Chad Johnson, The arizona boys are about 65 behind moss(No thanks to you guys))
Mark Brunell throws for 30000 yards in his career(needs under 150)
;D
all of that will happen, yet somehow you will lose. it just seems like a reasonable ending to this regular season. i can't wait.
I'm saying it right here, right now. The Colts will not win the SB (I don't think they'll make it there).
Quote from: MadMarchHare on December 27, 2005, 08:02:16 AM
I'm saying it right here, right now. The Colts will not win the SB (I don't think they'll make it there).
I agree - for exactly two reasons: Tony. Dungy.
Quote from: MadMarchHare on December 27, 2005, 08:02:16 AM
I'm saying it right here, right now. The Colts will not win the SB (I don't think they'll make it there).
I dunno about that.....especially them not making it there. The only team that I think really has a shot is going to be New England. They are getting healthy at the right time and have been the Colts Achilles Heal for the last few years. Besides, they are such a well coached team and so experienced that until they are actually knocked off, I'm not going to bet against them.
However, the Colts already beat them once in NE this year and if they face each other in the playoffs then it's going to be in the confines of the dome rather than Foxboro which is a HUGE advantage for Indy. Tom Brady and the Pats are unbeatable in Foxboro in January. But outside of Foxboro may be a different story.
The only team I think that could have given the Colts a run for their money was San Diego and they've already been eliminated. If the Seahawks play them in the Super Bowl then I think they could give them a tough time because Alexander is a beast but I don't know if anyone really has the defense to stop Indy.
i love reading all these posts from early in the year about how everyone sucks except for the eagles.and you guys also want eric moulds.ha ha.from one problem child to another.by the way ,how did terrell owens work out for the eagles?oh,i didnt realize he isnt playing,couldnt tell the difference.have a great new year eagle fans and make sure you guys keep that 12-15 million under the cap you always have(alot of good that does you)
Quote from: dmek25 on December 28, 2005, 08:32:04 AM
i love reading all these posts from early in the year about how everyone sucks except for the eagles.and you guys also want eric moulds.ha ha.from one problem child to another.by the way ,how did terrell owens work out for the eagles?oh,i didnt realize he isnt playing,couldnt tell the difference.have a great new year eagle fans and make sure you guys keep that 12-15 million under the cap you always have(alot of good that does you)
wow, there are so many idiotic things in that post. how do you stay alive? your best option now would be to get brain cancer and slowly wither away in a hospital bed while your family puts their life on hold to sit at your bed and cry as you turn into a vegetable.
ah sun mo,what an intelligent reply that a taterskin fan would come to expect from an eagle fan that has nothing better to do these days than to try an come up with a witty reply
Quote from: dmek25 on December 28, 2005, 08:32:04 AM
i love reading all these posts from early in the year about how everyone sucks except for the eagles.and you guys also want eric moulds.ha ha.from one problem child to another.by the way ,how did terrell owens work out for the eagles?oh,i didnt realize he isnt playing,couldnt tell the difference.have a great new year eagle fans and make sure you guys keep that 12-15 million under the cap you always have(alot of good that does you)
'
they said that we were unrealistic when we were (atleast i was) calling a 10-6 season while they were calling Super Bowl :-D
Eagle fans=most unrealistic?????? :-D
Quote from: dmek25 on December 28, 2005, 09:53:03 AM
ah sun mo,what an intelligent reply that a taterskin fan would come to expect from an eagle fan that has nothing better to do these days than to try an come up with a witty reply
why would I bother with an intelligent reply? i'm dealing with a taterskins fan. have fun getting bounced in the 1st round, if you make the playoffs. then, have fun looking up at the Eagles next year as things return to normal. but hey, if you want to gloat over the 1 year in the past 6 that the taterskins actually finished above the Eagles, have fun. but i still hope you get cancer, because even one less taterskins fan makes the world a better place.
they said that we were unrealistic when we were (atleast i was) calling a 10-6 season while they were calling Super Bowl
the difference is the eagle fans were calling superbowl a year after they made the superbowl...the skins fans have called superbowl every year for the last seven seasons when they cant even make the playoffs
Ha read back when they thought that the skins sucked at 3-0 for ONLY beating the Bears, Seahawks, and Cowboys.
combined record of those 3 teams removing losses to the skins is like 13-1 11-2 9=4 and that is 33-7. Some of the eagle fans said if we thought the bears and seahawks would win their division we were delusional :-D :-D I think we are more realistic, we atleast knew the bears and seahawks would be the best in there divisions let alone the 1 and 2 seeds :-D
i dont understand your point...is it that crazy for heads to have thought the skins would miss the playoffs when thats all theyve done for that last 15 years...my god what were they thinking??...fact is if the eagles had not had so many injuries the skins would have missed out again...shtein they still arent in
for the record i called the skins at 9-7...10-6
Quote from: ice grillin you on December 28, 2005, 10:42:53 AM
i dont understand your point...is it that crazy for heads to have thought the skins would miss the playoffs when thats all theyve done for that last 15 years...my god what were they thinking??...fact is if the eagles had not had so many injuries the skins would have missed out again...shtein they still arent in
for the record i called the skins at 9-7...10-6
yah,remember the shtein you got for being realistic???
http://www.concretefield.com/forum/index.php?topic=16208.0
You recognized the offensive line that has led the highest rushing team from week 13 (690-some yards ) was actually pretty good. You recognized that we had cory raymer at center last year and that jon jansen was hurt. All i ask is to look at the facts. All the games the skins played last year were boarder line games and they could have easily have gone in a different direction.
i just happen to be good like that and some people cant handle it...
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on December 28, 2005, 10:29:24 AM
Ha read back when they thought that the skins sucked at 3-0 for ONLY beating the Bears, Seahawks, and Cowboys.
combined record of those 3 teams removing losses to the skins is like 13-1 11-2 9=4 and that is 33-7. Some of the eagle fans said if we thought the bears and seahawks would win their division we were delusional :-D :-D I think we are more realistic, we atleast knew the bears and seahawks would be the best in there divisions let alone the 1 and 2 seeds :-D
The thing is that while you brag about beating the Bears or Seahawks... you know that the Skins couldn't touch either one of them right now. You only beat the Seahawks after they blew a GW FG, giving you a huge gift. Good thing you got to them early in the season before they hit any kind of stride.
Hell... even we beat Sand Diego. They'd crush us now.
you beat san diego because you blocked a field goal and ran it back for a touchdown. and you say we won by luck because seattle missed a field goal? bwahahhahaha
You missed the "They'd crush us now." part, which means you missed the entire farging point. But hey, you're a Skinsfan. Nobody expected you to get it.
it was never stated that the eagles didnt get lucky against the chargers...in addition to that it was mentioned that sd wouold destroy them now
in other words unbunch your panties and change what is one of the gayest screen names on the net
Quote from: EagleFeva on December 28, 2005, 11:07:39 AM
The thing is that while you brag about beating the Bears or Seahawks... you know that the Skins couldn't touch either one of them right now. You only beat the Seahawks after they blew a GW FG, giving you a huge gift. Good thing you got to them early in the season before they hit any kind of stride.
Hell... even we beat Sand Diego. They'd crush us now.
It would be hard for you to know less of what you are talking about.
The Skins are playing better ball than they were 10 weeks ago.
If you were actually watching the games you would know that.
Seattle and Chicago would not want to play the taterskins next week.
On the flip side, if I had to pick a team for the taterskins to play next week, Philly would make the top 5.
Gay...you are gay!
Quote from: The Waco Kid on December 28, 2005, 09:30:10 PM
Gay...you are gay!
Somehow that was a little funny.
What is funny is me getting club level tickets for half price. :-D
Quote from: qwert246 on December 29, 2005, 11:48:45 AM
Somehow that was a little funny.
What is funny is me getting club level tickets for half price. :-D
well at least you're smart enough to sit with the pansies in their club seats. you obviously are too scared to sit in the seats with the real fans. as you should.
being able to score tickets to a teams home game that means less than nothing and is a late game on new years day is a hoot
almost as funny as bringing down 10 thousand fans to another teams stadium for a game that actually counts
Quote from: qwert246 on December 29, 2005, 11:48:45 AM
Quote from: The Waco Kid on December 28, 2005, 09:30:10 PM
Gay...you are gay!
Somehow that was a little funny.
What is funny is me getting club level tickets for half price. :-D
Yeah, and i can get tickets to a Seattle home game and an Indy home game too. You are a farging waste.
IGY, I am hypnotized by your aviator. What is that from?
What is it about the way large-bootied women walk that makes them look like they're constantly on the verge of falling over. Like their asses are so juicy that they need to flail their arms around to keep their balance. Needless to say, I love that.
Quote from: methdeez on December 29, 2005, 12:53:45 PM
IGY, I am hypnotized by your aviator. What is that from?
(http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0007TFIM4.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg)
IGY, I am hypnotized by your aviator. What is that from?
its from a spike tv show a couple years back...thats esther baxter...a well known hip-hop video vixen
We don't get jokes here. You should know that.
Please explain this "joke" concept to me. Should I look it up on wikipedia?
taterskins.com look at the portis interview
taterskins.com
no
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v282/justmebyron/Misc/Untitled-1.jpg)
From what i think
Portis holding the trophy
Sean taylor top left
Rock behind portis
Chris cooley top right
Batman in the shadows up top is Ryan Clark
the guy next to portis is robert royal
Did they do a rendition of YMCA during the interview?
that whole dressing up act has gotten really unfunny. now the news here actually has a segment on it every week. i can't see how anyone thinks it's not old by now.
portis says its the last one now that southeast jerome can go to heaven. Sometimes its just the same stuff but now it is all of them comming out together.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on December 29, 2005, 04:39:02 PM
portis says its the last one now that southeast jerome can go to heaven. Sometimes its just the same stuff but now it is all of them comming out together.
Must have been a very crowded closet.
even taterskin fans think its the dumbest thing ever...and thats saying something
Quote from: phattymatty on December 29, 2005, 11:59:56 AM
Quote from: qwert246 on December 29, 2005, 11:48:45 AM
Somehow that was a little funny.
What is funny is me getting club level tickets for half price. :-D
well at least you're smart enough to sit with the pansies in their club seats. you obviously are too scared to sit in the seats with the real fans. as you should.
Fear. :-D
Overhyped Linc. Not nearly as intimidating to players as the Vet. (Or to fans)
There will be a lot of scalpers and a lot of empty seats.
Never sat in the club level at the Linc. Wanted to see what it was like.
rod woodson made fun of portis and his costumes as well as portis's cartwheels after a TD. Rod said his little girl dresses up and does cartwheels. In an interview this is what was said by my man portis
http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/chargers/20051126-9999-1s26chargers.html
Portis said he has received mostly positive feedback from teammates and fans, including "grandparents looking forward to it" each week. And he had harsh words for two of his critics, Lincoln Kennedy and Rod Woodson of NFL Network.
"Those guys, I'm not doing it for them," he said. "If they don't like what I do or if they're not happy with what I do, if they can't take it as a joke – which it is – it doesn't mean anything to me. There's no question of my sexuality. If they don't believe me, all they have to do is bring their wives forward and they can tell them what a man I am." " :-D
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on December 29, 2005, 05:23:51 PM
"There's no question of my sexuality. If they don't believe me, all they have to do is bring their wives forward and they can tell them what a man I am."
That sure sounds like the over-compensation of a flaming closet gaymo to me.
Hasn't anyone told him (http://www.sexisforromes.com/) yet?
:-D@eagles potentially being 0-6 in the division they thought they would walk over.
Potentially, huh? How dare you think that Joe Gibbs could possibly lose a game! How dare you, sire.
if the eagles lose this game they'll have gone from 6-0 in the division to 0-6 in the division. Has that ever happened to anyone before?
Considering no other team has ever gone 6-0 in this division, no.
Quote from: qwert246 on December 29, 2005, 05:17:22 PM
Fear. :-D
Overhyped Linc. Not nearly as intimidating to players as the Vet. (Or to fans)
There will be a lot of scalpers and a lot of empty seats.
Never sat in the club level at the Linc. Wanted to see what it was like.
I'm sure the last 3 years you've been rocking your Skins jersey in the upper level.
Considering no other team has ever gone 6-0 in this division, no.
lolol
3 days until your season is over, losers.
Art's at it again.... :-D
Big tough Art (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=135709)
The Post said this about ES;
QuoteWorst web site: Extremeskins.com, now owned and operated by the Washington taterskins and a place where no-accountability venom remains the lifeblood of a despicable operation.
And tough guy art responds;
QuoteI've sent Lenny a message informing him that the operators of this site are the same operators of this site the last five years and to please correct his factual error. It appears Len has grown upset by the fact after telling me he wanted to meet me so he could tell me ExtremeSkins is garbage in person that upon meeting me, he quickly averted his eyes, appeared to cry for momma, and ran away and his pride as a wee guy was hit realizing he did not want to express himself personally when he was more able to make feeble remarks elsewhere
Quote from: phattymatty on December 30, 2005, 07:48:31 AM
Quote from: qwert246 on December 29, 2005, 05:17:22 PM
Fear. :-D
Overhyped Linc. Not nearly as intimidating to players as the Vet. (Or to fans)
There will be a lot of scalpers and a lot of empty seats.
Never sat in the club level at the Linc. Wanted to see what it was like.
I'm sure the last 3 years you've been rocking your Skins jersey in the upper level.
Whatever.
This board has two faces. One that believes all the talk of intimidation is hype and one that believes simply going to the Linc is putting your life in danger.
I go to the Linc. I've never really had a problem.
I'll be there Sunday.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on December 30, 2005, 08:55:14 AM
Art's at it again.... :-D
Big tough Art (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=135709)
The Post said this about ES;
QuoteWorst web site: Extremeskins.com, now owned and operated by the Washington taterskins and a place where no-accountability venom remains the lifeblood of a despicable operation.
And tough guy art responds;
QuoteI've sent Lenny a message informing him that the operators of this site are the same operators of this site the last five years and to please correct his factual error. It appears Len has grown upset by the fact after telling me he wanted to meet me so he could tell me ExtremeSkins is garbage in person that upon meeting me, he quickly averted his eyes, appeared to cry for momma, and ran away and his pride as a wee guy was hit realizing he did not want to express himself personally when he was more able to make feeble remarks elsewhere
Art's a toolbag.
He's Dave Spadaro who also writes about hitting on strippers.
what a bunch of losers. i hope that website has a big gathering and a meteor hits the site and they all burn to a slow painful death.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on December 30, 2005, 12:16:28 AM
:-D@eagles potentially being 0-6 in the division they thought they would walk over.
:-D@ the fact that the pathetic taterskins probably won't make the playoffs for like the 10th straight year. What a bunch of losers!!
Quote from: qwert246 on December 30, 2005, 10:25:57 AM
He's Dave Spadaro who also writes about hitting on strippers.
But at least Spads gets a paycheck from the Eagles. Art gets the brushoff from coaches and players and then writes about it. :-D
the pathetic taterskins probably won't make the playoffs for like the 10th straight year
the skins are in if they beat the birds...are you saying the eagles will probably win sunday??
Quote from: ice grillin you on December 30, 2005, 01:19:27 PM
the pathetic taterskins probably won't make the playoffs for like the 10th straight year
the skins are in if they beat the birds...are you saying the eagles will probably win sunday??
What do you think?! ;)
i think you celebrate new years eve eve
Well shiver me timbers!
Quote from: ice grillin you on December 30, 2005, 01:19:27 PM
the pathetic taterskins probably won't make the playoffs for like the 10th straight year
the skins are in if they beat the birds...are you saying the eagles will probably win sunday??
You, sir, are a master of deduction.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on December 30, 2005, 08:55:14 AM
Art's at it again.... :-D
Big tough Art (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=135709)
The Post said this about ES;
QuoteWorst web site: Extremeskins.com, now owned and operated by the Washington taterskins and a place where no-accountability venom remains the lifeblood of a despicable operation.
And tough guy art responds;
QuoteI've sent Lenny a message informing him that the operators of this site are the same operators of this site the last five years and to please correct his factual error. It appears Len has grown upset by the fact after telling me he wanted to meet me so he could tell me ExtremeSkins is garbage in person that upon meeting me, he quickly averted his eyes, appeared to cry for momma, and ran away and his pride as a wee guy was hit realizing he did not want to express himself personally when he was more able to make feeble remarks elsewhere
Man thats funny. what a bunch of douchebags. one dude said that the Post is just jealous that ES won't put their ads on their site. I'm sure the Post is crumbling apart because of that.
(http://tinypic.com/jg5e1x.jpg)
Who knew they sold dog penis pinatas?
Who parked their car on top of an Arrington jersey.
(http://www.taterskins.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/KIHAFJKAGLAC/_E7T2788PG.jpg)
Skinsfan porn. How disturbing.
Woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
That awsome fumble on all-star Koy Detmer....man oh man. How do you guys do it?
Say it with me, Bigskin...
One and done...one and done...one and done...one and done.
1999 - playoffs & lose in Tampa
6 years later....
2005 - playoffs & lose in Tampa
6 years later....
2011 - your next playoff appearance
Thank your dumb ass coach for puttin in detmer! HAAA ha dumbass
Coy sucks. You didn't trust him all year after mcnabb gets hurt and suddenly the mesiah reid decides this is the guy for us.
What happened to my post ???
Anyways, congrats on the win. You still suck :)
Can't believe you almost lost to our scrubs :-D
It's Koy, numbnuts. And I guess Andy felt he would be able to hold on to the ball, but obviously, he was wrong there. It doesn't matter if its Koy or Andy Hall or McMahon, we suck. And you guys almost (should've) lost. Pathetic. But have fun with upcoming playoff loss to Chris Simms. :yay
wow, taterskins fans gloating over this win. nevermind the fact that it took 6 turnovers and 2 below-average QBs for them to finally be able to get the lead in the 4th quarter. i'm sure all over NFC playoff teams are worried.
but hey, the year of opposites continues, the Eagles don't make the playoffs and taterskins do, next year everything will go back to normal.
Quote from: Sun_Mo on January 01, 2006, 08:05:25 PM
wow, taterskins fans gloating over this win. nevermind the fact that it took 6 turnovers and 2 below-average QBs for them to finally be able to get the lead in the 4th quarter. i'm sure all over NFC playoff teams are worried.
but hey, the year of opposites continues, the Eagles don't make the playoffs and taterskins do, next year everything will go back to normal.
below-average?
What level QB are we comparing Detmer and McMahon to? College or HS?
please iggles fans, your team stinks, stop making excuses, sick of hearing them. get used to being in the cellar, your coach is going to have to change his ways to think about coming back to respectability. The league has "caught up", so to speak, to his offense and Johnson's defensive schemes. The truly great coaches recognize when this happens, it will be interesting to see if they do, and adjust. My guess is you'll come in next year with Pinky as your #1, undersized Westbrook as your running back, and a qb that has been in the league 8 years and can't get it done. Your window of oppurtunity for the Super Bowl has shut and ours is just opening. You should have taken advantage of winning a few rings when your team was the elite team in the NFC. I'm not saying the Skins are elite, they are far from it, but that's todays NFL, and great coaches find a way to adapt and win despite the parity.
I love stupid people.
Thats why hes a failure.
Washington still isn't in it. The Skins are travelling. :)
Good point......non-failure failure
Then we can get really technical. The Skins don't play in Washington. So Washington was never going to be in the playoffs. But the Seahawks play in that other Washington, and they were everyone's choice to win the West. So Washington was going most likely going to be in the playoffs.
Now as long as I don't have to hear about a Manning/Manning superbowl or Gibbs getting blown by Art, I don't care.
But you will because you want to.
No, I really don't. And I really won't.
You really do. And you will.
this thread was a great idea
There'll be one in 2006 too.
And next week when they lose to Tampa it'll be fun to point and laugh.
and if the skins win :-D You guys almost took us out but the saints gave it to tampa too. Tampa is hit or miss on any week. They can lose to the 9ers and get demolished by Pats but then beat the panthers and sweep atlanta. Last time we played them we played without Sean Taylor. This time we will most likely having our 4th and 5th CBs in there. Our D line will be healthy and our offense should suffer as we lost our best lineman Thomas against dallas. Last time we scored 35 and they scored 36. It was a surprise as the defenses should have been more dominant in that game. I think the skins would have won that game with sean taylor in there but that doesn't mean the skins will win this one. The bucs played well late in the season. The turning point for the bucs was the skins game. The skins extremely underestimated simms last time they played. The skins running game is much better than it was when they played the bucs but the passing game continues to suffer. Skins got NO PRESSURE against the eagles or the bucs. It was surprising in both games. If our defense doesn't get pressure we calapse.
Skins are playing better offense now getting 101 points in 3 weeks but the defense has given up a lot more but has gotten a lot more turnovers in the past 6 weeks.
Skins 24
Bucs 17
Run-on sentences are fun and I think you should use them more often because they really help get your point across and we all know you really want to get your point across and since that's the reason you're here is to get your point across you probably want to get your point across so you should use run-on sentences.
Quote from: archer on January 01, 2006, 11:14:38 PM
please iggles fans, your team stinks, stop making excuses, sick of hearing them. get used to being in the cellar, your coach is going to have to change his ways to think about coming back to respectability. The league has "caught up", so to speak, to his offense and Johnson's defensive schemes. The truly great coaches recognize when this happens, it will be interesting to see if they do, and adjust. My guess is you'll come in next year with Pinky as your #1, undersized Westbrook as your running back, and a qb that has been in the league 8 years and can't get it done. Your window of oppurtunity for the Super Bowl has shut and ours is just opening. You should have taken advantage of winning a few rings when your team was the elite team in the NFC. I'm not saying the Skins are elite, they are far from it, but that's todays NFL, and great coaches find a way to adapt and win despite the parity.
they do suck :-D
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 02, 2006, 03:41:14 PM
There'll be one in 2006 too.
And next week when they lose to Tampa it'll be fun to point and laugh.
I'm pretty sure there will be a need to revive this thread when the Eagles are done playing golf. :P
http://www.concretefield.com/forum/index.php?topic=16960.0
Nah, there's some pretty good golfers on the team. Mainly Akers, Detmer, and the cast of thousands we've used at kicker and punter this season.
Remember when portis's mom had to move down because the philly fans showed why everyone says they are the worst fans in the country?
Portis's mom punch some bitch in the nose.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/02/AR2006010201650.html
In Philly, Mama Said Knock You Out
Tuesday, January 3, 2006; E05
Clinton Portis took a beating in Sunday's victory over Philadelphia. Apparently, his mother dished one out.
In the fourth quarter, Portis's mother, Rhonnel Hearn, was sitting in the end zone at Lincoln Financial Field with Portis's stepfather and some friends when an Eagles fan apparently tossed a beer on the group. Portis's mother responded by punching the woman in the face, Portis said.
The altercation explained why Hearn watched part of the game from the taterskins sideline.
"She busted some lady in the nose, but that'll just teach you about messing with her," Portis said. "I think fans take that too serious. People come to the game to have a good time, that's what you should do. If you decide your team is losing and you want to cause trouble, then you're going to get what you're looking for. And yesterday, whoever that fan was, they got what they were looking for."
Portis rushed for 112 hard yards Sunday but re-injured an already sore shoulder and left wrist after being horse-collared in the fourth quarter by linebacker Trent Cole. "It's one of those Mondays where I feel like I ain't going to make it," Portis said with a laugh.
His mother, he said, fared better. "My mom can protect herself," Portis said.
-- Howard Bryant
:-[ Those Eagles fans are so mean. Oh no. Stay away, they'll kill you.
Bitch aught to be brought up on charges.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on January 02, 2006, 11:59:41 PM
Remember when portis's mom had to move down because the philly fans showed why everyone says they are the worst fans in the country?
Portis's mom punch some bitch in the nose.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/02/AR2006010201650.html
In Philly, Mama Said Knock You Out
Tuesday, January 3, 2006; E05
Clinton Portis took a beating in Sunday's victory over Philadelphia. Apparently, his mother dished one out.
In the fourth quarter, Portis's mother, Rhonnel Hearn, was sitting in the end zone at Lincoln Financial Field with Portis's stepfather and some friends when an Eagles fan apparently tossed a beer on the group. Portis's mother responded by punching the woman in the face, Portis said.
The altercation explained why Hearn watched part of the game from the taterskins sideline.
"She busted some lady in the nose, but that'll just teach you about messing with her," Portis said. "I think fans take that too serious. People come to the game to have a good time, that's what you should do. If you decide your team is losing and you want to cause trouble, then you're going to get what you're looking for. And yesterday, whoever that fan was, they got what they were looking for."
Portis rushed for 112 hard yards Sunday but re-injured an already sore shoulder and left wrist after being horse-collared in the fourth quarter by linebacker Trent Cole. "It's one of those Mondays where I feel like I ain't going to make it," Portis said with a laugh.
His mother, he said, fared better. "My mom can protect herself," Portis said.
-- Howard Bryant
Howard Bryant is an idiot, and it's pretty well known.
A) It wasn't a horsecollar.
B) It was Jaqua Thomas who made the tackle.
C) Neither Trent Cole or Jaqua Thomas are linebackers.
D) The likelyhood of Portis' mom punching anyone is slim to none.
Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC
D) The likelyhood of Portis' mom punching anyone is slim to none.
Hey....Someone has to be the man in the family.
Mean ol' Philly fans :'( :'( :'(
Too bad the Linc's security didn't let the pepper spray rip.
That's never hap...oh, wait. Yes it has.
Where was that again, taterskin fans?
This is a good one...don't believe this for one second. Pissing on the tire cover? I believe that. But shteintin'? No way. :-D
Eagles fans shat all over my car! (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=136834)
QuoteFor some stupid reason I left my Skins tire cover on after my tailgate party, and I returned to it after the game I found someone pissing on it. Then, after further review, I found human crap draped all over the windows and front and back windshield. There were huge clumps of feces all over the car and it was also smudged into the red paint of my car. Eagles fans are animals. I was so happy after the game, I couldn't care less. It makes for a funny story though.
Stay Classy, DC
Dolla Beeel for President
And some responses...
QuoteSo, what do eagle fans eat? Could you tell?
QuoteThat is beyond classless. That's dispicable and not human. There is nothing funny about that in any form or fashion. Just disgusting. Unhealthy. Philly must be the home of reverse Darwinism.
QuoteIt's a shame Portis' mom wasn't there to set them straight. What complete and total scumbags. Props to you for holding it together, I would have been out for blood. Cowards are as cowards do in a city of cowards I suppose.
QuoteYou gotta love NFC East football........I don't think many people were growing tails on vehicles in that Panthers Falcons game......and undoubtedly it had to be fresh pie.
Remember these are fans that have to spell their team name at the end of their so called fight song.
And some more tall tales of shenanigans in the stands...
Trouble in the stands (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=136553)
QuoteSure enough, about ten minutes later, some ******* Eagles fan grabs my hat again, runs down to row 1 and wings it over the side amidst another burst of cheers and applause. You would not believe how loud it was.
Now security with the bright yellow wind breaker is getting in to it. They saw it and made the guy come up and apologize to me, and wanted me to press charges or something, I said don't worry about it. And the security guy said "Well, I'm worried about it", and I still said no I'm fine.
I don't really care about the hat, but I definitely cared about the buttons, so I'm glad I saved them.
Now, everytime somebody walks down the steps, they're yelling to me "Hey, where's your hat? Bwahahahhahah"
A few minutes later, I heard something hit the back of my chair. Okay, now they're throwing stuff at me. Plus, about six rows have cleared out behind me, making me an easy target. Coincidence? So I took off my white Brunell jersey and wrapped it in my coat. A few minutes after that, something hit me in the top of the shoulder, and it's a one of those little plastic containers with some kind of liquid in it - looks like soy sauce. Fortunately it didn't break open as planned.
So I got pissed, went down and asked to be moved, and they put me down in row 3 behind a wall, and I was fine after that.
Got back to my truck. Somebody had broken a taterskins car flag off somebody's car (not mine) and threw it on top of the hood of my truck. Somebody else two spaces over had their valve stem cut with a knife, so the tire went flat. No other damage that I'm aware of.
For all you who say I deserved it because you don't do that in Philadelphia, I say I cannot change the way I watch a game. I can't NOT stand when taterskins score. I can't NOT yell DEFENSE as loud as I can when the opponent has the fall, especially in the 4th quarter with the score close. I can't do it, and I'm not going to change my ways next year when I go -- although I will definitely wear a cheaper jersey and crappy ball cap.
As it turned out, Joe Holley of the Wash Post interviewed a lot of us at the tailgate before and after the game and mentioned me at the end of one of the articles this morning.
And the article from the Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/02/AR2006010200045.html)
QuoteEagles quarterback Koy Detmer, fleeing taterskins defenders, fired off a pass. Washington linebacker Lemar Marshall stretched to the sky, batted the ball,
Were these losers even watching that game? It was McMahon who threw that INT.
And this loser linked an article that wasn't written by Joe Holley and made NO mentions of anything going on in the Linc stands. Only some crap in a sportsbar.
supposedly the skins locked up gregg williams for an insane amount of money...and he is not allow to pursue hc jobs
edit:
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5216800
Quotetaterskins | Williams agrees to 3-year deal
Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:59:33 -0800
Jay Glazer, of FOXSports.com, reports Washington taterskins defensive coordinator Gregg Williams has agreed to a new three-year deal worth nearly $8 million and will remain with the team, according to sources close to Williams. The deal is well above the financial terms for any NFL coordinator. The source also said Williams has agreed not to interview for any head coaching openings this offseason, but it does not exclude him from taking a job offer in 2007.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 03, 2006, 01:40:57 AM
And the article from the Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/02/AR2006010200045.html)
QuoteHoughton and a high-school buddy, Jon Nachtsheim, 31, had been quietly nursing glasses of Miller Lite
Ha.
Quote from: phattymatty on January 03, 2006, 01:40:34 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 03, 2006, 01:40:57 AM
And the article from the Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/02/AR2006010200045.html)
QuoteHoughton and a high-school buddy, Jon Nachtsheim, 31, had been quietly nursing glasses of Miller Lite
Ha.
I'm not sure what the exercise in caution was. What the hell do they mean by that?
Quote from: qwert246 on January 03, 2006, 02:01:46 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on January 03, 2006, 01:40:34 PM
QuoteHoughton and a high-school buddy, Jon Nachtsheim, 31, had been quietly nursing glasses of Miller Lite
Ha.
I'm not sure what the exercise in caution was. What the hell do they mean by that?
Hate to say it but good move by the Skins locking Williams up. I don't consider the Skins D overly talented, but he knows how to maximize their strengths and weaknesses.
Quote from: phattymatty on January 03, 2006, 02:09:59 PM
Quote from: qwert246 on January 03, 2006, 02:01:46 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on January 03, 2006, 01:40:34 PM
QuoteHoughton and a high-school buddy, Jon Nachtsheim, 31, had been quietly nursing glasses of Miller Lite
Ha.
I'm not sure what the exercise in caution was. What the hell do they mean by that?
Yeah, I saw that. That was funny. It's the rest of the quote that doesn't make any sense to me
QuoteHoughton and a high-school buddy, Jon Nachtsheim, 31, had been quietly nursing glasses of Miller Lite -- an exercise in caution, they said, the day after New Year's Eve -- until the game turned.
Quote from: qwert246 on January 03, 2006, 02:25:42 PM
Yeah, I saw that. That was funny. It's the rest of the quote that doesn't make any sense to meQuoteHoughton and a high-school buddy, Jon Nachtsheim, 31, had been quietly nursing glasses of Miller Lite -- an exercise in caution, they said, the day after New Year's Eve -- until the game turned.
i'm assuming that meant that they were still hungover from the 4 beers they had the night before on new years.
taterskins fans...
:-D
Quote from: phattymatty on January 03, 2006, 02:29:12 PM
Quote from: qwert246 on January 03, 2006, 02:25:42 PM
Yeah, I saw that. That was funny. It's the rest of the quote that doesn't make any sense to meQuoteHoughton and a high-school buddy, Jon Nachtsheim, 31, had been quietly nursing glasses of Miller Lite -- an exercise in caution, they said, the day after New Year's Eve -- until the game turned.
i'm assuming that meant that they were still hungover from the 4 beers they had the night before on new years.
(http://www.thehogs.net/forum/images/smiles/eusa_doh.gif)
Williams will now take over when gibbs leaves. ;D
He did such a good job at Buffalo, you guys should be pumped.
^^^
beat me to it...real recognize real
He didn't do a bad job in Buffalo. The Skins-hating media spins it that way to make him look bad.
Well some people didn't like Belichick in Cleveland, but his next go around has been pretty good.
It is possible to improve, and if he's smart he can pick up on two of Gibb's strengths.
1) He's a good leader. People like working for him and playing for him. Not every boss can make people feel that way.
2) He delegates effectively. You can't do everything, there's just not enough time. Gibb's lets people have accountability, as players and coaches.
Talking about his last go around in Buffalo is missing the big picture. He is still considered one of the best defensive minds in the NFL, making a top defense with older players like Wynn and Daniels, hell Salave'a is 30. He is being promised the HC job after Gibbs leaves. All the role players will be the same, the caoching staff will remain intact. There will be continuity. That's better than going in fresh to a new team with new personalities. It's good for Williams and it's good for the taterskins
Williams was 17-31 in Buffalo.
Seventeen AND Thirty-One.
Hard to believe they fired him.
One might say "inconceivable" even.
I blame the Refs as the reason William's stint in Buffalo was a failure. They knew he'd eventually take over for the Skins and were trying to get an early start.
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on January 03, 2006, 05:46:06 PM
Williams was 17-31 in Buffalo.
Seventeen AND Thirty-One.
Hard to believe they fired him.
One might say "inconceivable" even.
Preposterous!
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on January 03, 2006, 05:46:06 PM
Williams was 17-31 in Buffalo.
Seventeen AND Thirty-One.
Hard to believe they fired him.
One might say "inconceivable" even.
"Inconceivable!"(http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:eRLR6D7j7YkJ:surbrook.devermore.net/adaptionsbook/vezzini.jpg)
(http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:eRLR6D7j7YkJ:surbrook.devermore.net/adaptionsbook/vezzini.jpg) = taterskins
Greg Williams as DC = good wine
Greg Williams as HC = not so good wine
Quote from: EagleFeva on January 04, 2006, 07:35:15 AM
Greg Williams as DC = good wine
Greg Williams as HC = not so good wine
Keep telling yourself that. It dulls the pain.
Greg Williams head coaching record: 17-31.
Quote from: qwert246 on January 04, 2006, 08:48:44 AM
Quote from: EagleFeva on January 04, 2006, 07:35:15 AM
Greg Williams as DC = good wine
Greg Williams as HC = not so good wine
Keep telling yourself that. It dulls the pain.
Actually, his past HC experience dulls the pain quite nicely.
I find it funny how every defensive coach who had an unsuccessful first stint as an HC but takes a new HC job is now considered the next Belicheck. :-D
People tend to forget that he was a big part of winning some SBs prior to getting that job and not some random-decent DC.
Bill Belichick <================================Greg Williams===> Dave Wanstedt, Dick Jauron, Ray Rhodes, etc.
how bout that, i never knew what word meatcicle replaced.
Quote from: EagleFeva on January 04, 2006, 07:35:15 AM
Greg Williams as DC = good wine
Greg Williams as HC = not so good wine
I actually agree. I think once gibbs retires in 3 years Williams will be ready to coach. He always talks about how he is learning things from gibbs. Right now i would be pretty scared with Williams as coach. The thing is i do think he is gonna take over after Joe and he will be ready.
per PFT
QuoteWILLIAMS FREE TO LEAVE THIS YEAR, IF HE WANTS
Despite initial reports that the new contract signed by taterskins defensive coordinator Gregg Williams prevents him from interviewing for a head coaching job in 2006, other reports suggest that Williams' $8 million, three-year deal does not preclude him from leaving this year, if he so chooses.
Who's right? Per NFL spokesman Greg Aiello, a provision preventing an assistant coach from interviewing for or accepting a head coaching position is prohibited by league rules.
It's possible that Williams and taterskins owner Daniel Snyder has agreed verbally that Williams won't leave, but how enforceable is that? Put simply, it isn't.
So if someone wants to, say, double the $2.67 million annual salary that Williams will earn the next three years, Williams is free to accept.
I am laughing in advance at any team that would sign Gregg Williams to be their HC for $5m+/year.
I'm still pointing and laughing at the fact that they gave Williams $8 mil after one semi-successful season.
You can say whatever you want about Williams not being HC material. The fact is, your opinions are total crap!
This thread proves it! Isn't the whole thing just "You 'Skins fans are so delusional you think you'll make the playoffs", "Gibbs is past it", "The 'Skins are going 5-11 if they're lucky", ...
Well, now what? This just shows that you guys may have opinions but you actually HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.
Quite clearly, none of you know anything about football and this thread is an 87 page testament to that! So, to all the 'Skins fans out there don't take any of what these guys say seriously because they have been proven to be totally ignorant of anything football related.
Your opinions on how good Gregg Williams is a coach don't mean jack shtein, because all of you don't know jack shtein! You think you do but you have proved otherwise over and over again. Have a good offseason, losers (you got swept in your division!)! :'( :-D
Can you show us how? You've got a lot of experience at it.
One mediocre year that allows them to eke into the playoffs and you'd think its 1988 all over again. Your franchise is a joke. Laughable. But hey, enjoy your one playoff game.
Hey, just face it, you, the members of concreteforum who posted in this thread don't know shtein. EVERYTHING you have said in this thread has been proven to be wrong. Good work geniuses.
Why should I assume that this stupid statement is any more valid than any of the other crap you guys have spewed around here:
QuoteYour franchise is a joke. Laughable. But hey, enjoy your one playoff game.
rjs, YOU of all people can't talk because 90% of the stuff you've said in this thread couldn't be more wrong. How do you expect me to take your statement seriously? If anything is a joke it is your so-called football "knowledge."
Quote from: rjs246 on January 06, 2006, 10:10:37 AM
One mediocre year that allows them to eke into the playoffs and you'd think its 1988 all over again. Your franchise is a joke. Laughable. But hey, enjoy your one playoff game.
You don't eke into the playoffs on a five game winning streak.
Quote from: twatson on January 06, 2006, 10:08:52 AM
You can say whatever you want about Williams not being HC material.
You don't really have to say much, a 17-31 HC record speaks for itself.
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 06, 2006, 10:17:47 AM
Quote from: twatson on January 06, 2006, 10:08:52 AM
You can say whatever you want about Williams not being HC material.
You don't really have to say much, a 17-31 HC record is enough.
Just like Belichick's 20-28 record, huh?
But why do I bother even arguing, we've already established that your opinions are completely worthless, haven't we?
No. 20-28 is better than 17-31. The math is actually pretty simple if you need me to explain it.
Quote from: twatson on January 06, 2006, 10:24:00 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 06, 2006, 10:17:47 AM
Quote from: twatson on January 06, 2006, 10:08:52 AM
You can say whatever you want about Williams not being HC material.
You don't really have to say much, a 17-31 HC record is enough.
Just like Belichick's 20-28 record, huh?
But why do I bother even arguing, we've already established that your opinions are completely worthless, haven't we?
And how many SB teams was Gregg Williams a DC for? Now how many SB teams was Belicheck a DC for?
I posted this a few days ago, guess you missed it:
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 04, 2006, 09:50:06 AM
I find it funny how every defensive coach who had an unsuccessful first stint as an HC but takes a new HC job is now considered the next Belicheck. :-D
People tend to forget that he was a big part of winning some SBs prior to getting that job and not some random-decent DC.
the biggest difference is that Belichick actually took the browns to the playoffs. gregg williams barely sniffed .500
belichick did it with an aging byner with testeverde. williams had talent and couldnt do shtein with them (Price, Moulds, Travis Henry, to a smaller extent Bledsoe)
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 06, 2006, 10:36:32 AMAnd how many SB teams was Gregg Williams a DC for? Now how many SB teams was Belicheck a DC for?
One (this year) ;)
Quote from: twatson on January 06, 2006, 10:46:53 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 06, 2006, 10:36:32 AMAnd how many SB teams was Gregg Williams a DC for? Now how many SB teams was Belicheck a DC for?
One (this year) ;)
Ever wonder why this thread was created? :-D :-D :-D
Quote from: qwert246 on January 06, 2006, 10:13:30 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 06, 2006, 10:10:37 AM
One mediocre year that allows them to eke into the playoffs and you'd think its 1988 all over again. Your franchise is a joke. Laughable. But hey, enjoy your one playoff game.
You don't eke into the playoffs on a five game winning streak.
And if you lost even one of those games you wouldn't be there. That is the definition of ekeing in. Sure, you guys pulled out some gutsy wins, but you're the 6 seed for a reason. Take away one of those hail marys in week 2, you're rotting on the shelf.
Quote from: twatson on January 06, 2006, 10:46:53 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 06, 2006, 10:36:32 AMAnd how many SB teams was Gregg Williams a DC for? Now how many SB teams was Belicheck a DC for?
One (this year) ;)
Now, having said that, please also state that you'll come back when the Skins fall on their faces and don't make it, just to eat your crow.
Well, so far all the things I said in this thread have actually come true while everything you guys have said has been shown to be total crap. How hypocrytical is it for you to call me out on that after all of you have repeatedly been proven to be wrong while I have been right?
Quote from: qwert246 on January 06, 2006, 10:13:30 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 06, 2006, 10:10:37 AM
One mediocre year that allows them to eke into the playoffs and you'd think its 1988 all over again. Your franchise is a joke. Laughable. But hey, enjoy your one playoff game.
You don't eke into the playoffs on a five game winning streak.
Of course you do... when it's the last week of the season and you're in a situation where if you win, you're in and if you lose, you're out... yup... eeking in.
Do you really have trouble seeing our point? EVERY SINGLE YEAR you idiots come around and predict great things for the skins. They'll beat the Eagles! They'll win the division! They'll make the playoffs! They'll win it all! The taterskins have a ton of talent! Every year its nonsense.
So this one year some things fall into place and they make the playoffs as a 6 seed and now you want credit for your clairvoyance? Give me a farging break.
I'm not asking for it, I am just asking for you guys to admit what complete idiots you are
Quote from: rjs246 on January 06, 2006, 11:00:48 AM
Do you really have trouble seeing our point? EVERY SINGLE YEAR you idiots come around and predict great things for the skins. They'll beat the Eagles! They'll win the division! They'll make the playoffs! They'll win it all! The taterskins have a ton of talent! Every year its nonsense.
So this one year some things fall into place and they make the playoffs as a 6 seed and now you want credit for your clairvoyance? Give me a farging break.
Couldn't have said it better myself.
Or can't you admit you were all wrong?
Quote from: twatson on January 06, 2006, 11:05:41 AM
I'm not asking for it, I am just asking for you guys to admit what complete idiots you are
Great point. None of us predicted that the Eagles would have 14 guys on the IR and would basically hand every NFC East opponent 2 free victories. We're idiots!
Quote from: twatson on January 06, 2006, 11:05:41 AM
I'm not asking for it, I am just asking for you guys to admit what complete idiots you are
Sure, I'll admit we were idiots this season, but only if you agree to admit every Skins fan from the 2000-2005 seasons were idiots. Times yours :)
Quote from: twatson on January 06, 2006, 10:12:31 AM
Hey, just face it, you, the members of concreteforum who posted in this thread don't know shtein. EVERYTHING you have said in this thread has been proven to be wrong. Good work geniuses.
It's true, we were wrong about the outcome this season. However, the main point of this thread is basically how Skins fans are douchebags and to make fun of how stupid they are and how dumb they look. That hasn't changed, regardless of the fact that you made the playoffs.
Bitches call me the Mayor.
Quote from: rjs246 on January 06, 2006, 11:08:26 AM
Quote from: twatson on January 06, 2006, 11:05:41 AM
I'm not asking for it, I am just asking for you guys to admit what complete idiots you are
Great point. None of us predicted that the Eagles would have 14 guys on the IR and would basically hand every NFC East opponent 2 free victories. We're idiots!
Don't fool yourself, even at the beginning of the season you guys weren't going anywhere. You guys were in last place in the division from the very first week of the season. Don't you remember that?
The skins have been in first place after one week several times over the past 6 years. Lot of good it did them. You're an idiot. But please, keep typing you're only proving our point further.
I'm not talking about after one week. I'm saying that throughout the seaon you were in last place. Sure, it started in the first week but the rest of the division stayed ahead of you the rest of the year.
Quote from: rjs246 on January 06, 2006, 11:00:48 AM
Do you really have trouble seeing our point? EVERY SINGLE YEAR you idiots come around and predict great things for the skins. They'll beat the Eagles! They'll win the division! They'll make the playoffs! They'll win it all! The taterskins have a ton of talent! Every year its nonsense.
So this one year some things fall into place and they make the playoffs as a 6 seed and now you want credit for your clairvoyance? Give me a farging break.
I cant speak for years past but Gibbs does know how to coach. The taterskins are the only NFC team in the top eleven in offense and defense. The only legitimate loss in conference was to the Giants after Mara's death. I doubt things fell into place so they could make the playoffs...they went out and won five games in a row to make it. The difference between this year and since Gibbs retired is that now the taterskins have stability and have built the team chemistry that lacked during the Danny boy shopping sprees since he bought the team.
I wouldnt say the skins have a ton of talent but what do have is a bunch of hard working guys with heart and that is more valuable than the talent crybabies that litter a lot of nfl rosters.
Quote from: MadMarchHare on January 06, 2006, 10:52:10 AM
Quote from: qwert246 on January 06, 2006, 10:13:30 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 06, 2006, 10:10:37 AM
One mediocre year that allows them to eke into the playoffs and you'd think its 1988 all over again. Your franchise is a joke. Laughable. But hey, enjoy your one playoff game.
You don't eke into the playoffs on a five game winning streak.
And if you lost even one of those games you wouldn't be there. That is the definition of ekeing in. Sure, you guys pulled out some gutsy wins, but you're the 6 seed for a reason. Take away one of those hail marys in week 2, you're rotting on the shelf.
People do that shtein all day long.
To use your logic, the taterskins should have won in Tampa because of the 2-point conversion that never happened, or should have won in Denver because of the tuc-non-tuck rule. Should've won vs. SD, probably should've won vs. KC.
Hell there's you're undefeated season right there. Holla!!11
Who gives a shtein? A wins a win, and a loss is a loss. I didn't cry over those losses, and I won't agree that the wins like the Dallass win were meaningless.
Five wins in a row=hot team.
No team in the NFC wants to play the taterskins right now.
Quote from: skin48 on January 06, 2006, 11:53:10 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 06, 2006, 11:00:48 AM
Do you really have trouble seeing our point? EVERY SINGLE YEAR you idiots come around and predict great things for the skins. They'll beat the Eagles! They'll win the division! They'll make the playoffs! They'll win it all! The taterskins have a ton of talent! Every year its nonsense.
So this one year some things fall into place and they make the playoffs as a 6 seed and now you want credit for your clairvoyance? Give me a farging break.
I cant speak for years past but Gibbs does know how to coach. The taterskins are the only NFC team in the top eleven in offense and defense. The only legitimate loss in conference was to the Giants after Mara's death. I doubt things fell into place so they could make the playoffs...they went out and won five games in a row to make it. The difference between this year and since Gibbs retired is that now the taterskins have stability and have built the team chemistry that lacked during the Danny boy shopping sprees since he bought the team.
I wouldnt say the skins have a ton of talent but what do have is a bunch of hard working guys with heart and that is more valuable than the talent crybabies that litter a lot of nfl rosters.
How was the loss to Tampa not "legitimate?"
It wasn't legit because a call went against them at the end of the game. Any game where calls go against them isn't legit. Obviously. Welcome to the world of the taterskins Bandwagon. What a farging joke.
Quote from: Geowhizzer on January 06, 2006, 01:20:39 PM
How was the loss to Tampa not "legitimate?"
Because of the ref conspiracy against Washington. Skins fans claim Alstott was down, but the Zapruder film clearly shows Alstott's elbow going 'back, and to the left', 'back, and to the left', before crossing the goal line.
For reference, Sean Taylor (http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/493084) has averaged 73 tackles a year, 3 picks, 2 ffs, 1 sack and one arrest per year.
Sounds like the definition of average for a free safety.
Quote from: qwert246 on January 06, 2006, 12:35:17 PM
Quote from: MadMarchHare on January 06, 2006, 10:52:10 AM
Quote from: qwert246 on January 06, 2006, 10:13:30 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 06, 2006, 10:10:37 AM
One mediocre year that allows them to eke into the playoffs and you'd think its 1988 all over again. Your franchise is a joke. Laughable. But hey, enjoy your one playoff game.
You don't eke into the playoffs on a five game winning streak.
And if you lost even one of those games you wouldn't be there. That is the definition of ekeing in. Sure, you guys pulled out some gutsy wins, but you're the 6 seed for a reason. Take away one of those hail marys in week 2, you're rotting on the shelf.
People do that shtein all day long.
To use your logic, the taterskins should have won in Tampa because of the 2-point conversion that never happened, or should have won in Denver because of the tuc-non-tuck rule. Should've won vs. SD, probably should've won vs. KC.
Hell there's you're undefeated season right there. Holla!!11
Who gives a shtein? A wins a win, and a loss is a loss. I didn't cry over those losses, and I won't agree that the wins like the Dallass win were meaningless.
Five wins in a row=hot team.
No team in the NFC wants to play the taterskins right now.
:-D Yeah, you were getting it handed to you last week until Mike McMahon remembered who he was. Please, you eke past the embarrassment that was the Eagles this season, you really think you'll cause any damage in the post-season. Nimrod.
Quote from: MadMarchHare on January 06, 2006, 01:28:50 PM
:-D Yeah, you were getting it handed to you last week until Mike McMahon remembered who he was. Please, you eke past the embarrassment that was the Eagles this season, you really think you'll cause any damage in the post-season. Nimrod.
You're starting to sound like the guy you emulate in your avatar. :P
Quote from: Geowhizzer on January 06, 2006, 01:20:39 PM
Quote from: skin48 on January 06, 2006, 11:53:10 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 06, 2006, 11:00:48 AM
Do you really have trouble seeing our point? EVERY SINGLE YEAR you idiots come around and predict great things for the skins. They'll beat the Eagles! They'll win the division! They'll make the playoffs! They'll win it all! The taterskins have a ton of talent! Every year its nonsense.
So this one year some things fall into place and they make the playoffs as a 6 seed and now you want credit for your clairvoyance? Give me a farging break.
I cant speak for years past but Gibbs does know how to coach. The taterskins are the only NFC team in the top eleven in offense and defense. The only legitimate loss in conference was to the Giants after Mara's death. I doubt things fell into place so they could make the playoffs...they went out and won five games in a row to make it. The difference between this year and since Gibbs retired is that now the taterskins have stability and have built the team chemistry that lacked during the Danny boy shopping sprees since he bought the team.
I wouldnt say the skins have a ton of talent but what do have is a bunch of hard working guys with heart and that is more valuable than the talent crybabies that litter a lot of nfl rosters.
How was the loss to Tampa not "legitimate?"
He didnt get in and we were without griffin and taylor. There was also an interception earlier in the game that the defender hit moss before the ball was there. The bucs first big play to Galloway should have been ruled no completion due to the fact he was out of bounds but the Refs in their wisdom ruled he was forced out.
Like I said. Referee decisions went against the Skins and that completely nullifies the validity of any loss. Duh.
Quote from: rjs246 on January 06, 2006, 02:10:53 PM
Like I said. Referee decisions went against the Skins and that completely nullifies the validity of any loss. Duh.
Well, the refs were against the Eagles, too, or else they would have been 16-0.
16-0 I say!
Quote from: rjs246 on January 06, 2006, 01:22:12 PM
It wasn't legit because a call went against them at the end of the game. Any game where calls go against them isn't legit. Obviously. Welcome to the world of the taterskins Bandwagon. What a farging joke.
Ok let me go back...two nfc losses. I am betting Simms cant repeat his performance with Grif and Taylor in the game
Quote from: Geowhizzer on January 06, 2006, 02:12:41 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 06, 2006, 02:10:53 PM
Like I said. Referee decisions went against the Skins and that completely nullifies the validity of any loss. Duh.
Well, the refs were against the Eagles, too, or else they would have been 16-0.
16-0 I say!
If my team lost to the cardinals and packers I would be blaming the refs too :D
Who lost to the Packers, exactly?
Quote from: rjs246 on January 06, 2006, 02:17:33 PM
Who lost to the Packers, exactly?
Ummm... New Orleans, Atlanta, Detroit and Seattle.
Nope, no Philly.
Sorry about that...I have been in shock this week. Not used to my team playing in January. :boom
Quote from: skin48 on January 06, 2006, 03:27:06 PM
Sorry about that...I have been in shock this week. Not used to my team playing in January. :boom
it might also be from the homo butt sex.
God damnit, I can't stand the thought of my football happiness being in the hands of Chris Simms.
I kind of hope the taterskins win this weekend. The fans will be so sure that the win over the Seahawks earlier in the season in Washington actually matters and will be predicting victory. The Seahawks will then proceed to whoop up on the taterskins it's their job. Because it is their job.
Skinsfan does not need a bigger head from a playoff victory. Deflation now is for the best.
There is no part of me that hopes the Skins win this weekend. I would rather eat hot lead through me earhole than root in any way for a taterskins playoff victory.
Agreed. Skins fans already think they actually belong in the playoffs this year. Get 'em out quick, fast and in a hurry and bring 'em back to reality. They've already had enough happiness to last them another 6 years.
Quote from: phattymatty on January 06, 2006, 03:40:29 PM
Quote from: skin48 on January 06, 2006, 03:27:06 PM
Sorry about that...I have been in shock this week. Not used to my team playing in January. :boom
it might also be from the homo butt sex.
Thats reserved for McNabb and Cheeks Reid
Oooo, gay sex joke battle.
You got served, whoever made that first gay joke.
Quote from: General_Failure on January 06, 2006, 06:17:07 PM
You got served, whoever made that first gay joke.
How is everyone in Eagles land? Have'nt been around in a little bit, just dropped in to say hello. The game on Sunday was great, had great seats, your house (the Linc) is an awesome stadium. I'm sure you guys are rooting for your fellow NFC East friends, the Washington taterskins, in this years playoffs, and for that I thank you. Everyone knows we are the team noone wants to face, we have the ability to beat any NFC team if we are on our game. Well, I check back in a couple of weeks, hopefully we'll still be playing. Thanks in advance for your support.
Ha.
Good one, archer. :-D
Go Bucs!
Quote from: archer on January 06, 2006, 09:26:01 PM
How is everyone in Eagles land? Have'nt been around in a little bit, just dropped in to say hello. The game on Sunday was great, had great seats, your house (the Linc) is an awesome stadium. I'm sure you guys are rooting for your fellow NFC East friends, the Washington taterskins, in this years playoffs, and for that I thank you. Everyone knows we are the team noone wants to face, we have the ability to beat any NFC team if we are on our game. Well, I check back in a couple of weeks, hopefully we'll still be playing. Thanks in advance for your support.
:-D :-D :-D
Wow, that's a good one.
Wait... :sly
You were kiddin', right?
I find this ammusing. I couldn't give a shtein of what you philly fans think and i don't know why other taterskins fans now are trying to tell you everything you said this year was wrong. it was wrong. All of the philly fans did not look outside their own team at the beginning of the year. YOu all were predicting super bowl and failed to realize teams would get better.
At week 4 you called the cowboys,bears, and seahawks weak teams. To be so stupid is not possible so i will credit that to your delusional thoughts of you being the only dominant team in the NFC. Their were pages of talking between skin fans and eagle fans about chicago and the seahawks. The eagle fans said that skin fans were crazy if we thought they would win their divisions. Everything you eagle fans predicted was wrong this year in the NFC and not just about the skins.
Is anyone else growing tired of this attentionwhoring imbecile's "act?"
(http://espn-att.starwave.com/media/nfl/2006/0106/photo/a_portis_372.jpg)
Just burn him.
He's so cool and funny. What an awsome guy.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on January 07, 2006, 04:57:41 AM
I couldn't give a shtein of what you philly fans think
any yet you are still posting here?
Don't worry, he'll be gone next year when they're 6-10.
Quote from: Wingspan on January 07, 2006, 12:39:00 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on January 07, 2006, 04:57:41 AM
I couldn't give a shtein of what you philly fans think
any yet you are still posting here?
They never can answer that one. :-D
He doesn't give a shtein what we think so I guess he's
accidentally been registered here for 6 months. Makes sense. :sly
ahhhhhhhhh just an hour away from the beginning of the end to the taterskins season. can't wait! ^-^
Gibbs doing his best Andy Reid impression and burning an early timeout. :D
I want to see a tie going 20 OT's
:boo
:puke
this sucks
Indeed. But it would suck if the roles were reversed as well. Both teams can lick my chode.
17-3 Skins, 5:28 left before halftime
You can never count on Gruden to do anything right.
Shh, shh, shh. Hear that?
It's the winds of change.....
Take me to the magic of the moment
On a glory night
Where the children of tomorrow dream away
in the wind of change
It's fixed! It's fixed!
Well, now the Foreskins fans will have their bitch material for the next 9 inactive months. :-D :-D :-D
Pittman punches Taylor right in front of the ref and TAYLOR gets flagged and gives the Bucs a first down! :-D
Maybe the refs really are against the Skins... :paranoid
;)
Oh good, I was worried that they'd have to face reality for a second there. Whew!
Quote from: General_Failure on January 07, 2006, 06:42:16 PM
Oh good, I was worried that they'd have to face reality for a second there. Whew!
One miracle at a time there, Jesus.
HE GOT EJECTED!!!!!!! :-D :-D :-D
Joey T. is HEATED!
That was my old avatar, Sho.
Sorry Skins fans... there went your bitch material. Taylor pulled a Romanowski! :-D
Apparently Taylor spit in Pittman's face...
He obviously learned that from the scumbag Philly fans.
Portis' mom is gonna be waitin' out in the parking lot for Mr. Pittman.
I don't like rooting for the Bucs, but I liked that sack.
Non tackle by the Skins and the retards are drooling all over Williams for being a tough runner.
This is a bad call. That guy has control of the ball until his elbow hits the ground. Farg the stupid taterskins. What a bunch of losers.
The Bucs are trying to hand it to the Skins, the Skins hand it right back. Who wants to lose less here?
"Where would you rather not be than right here, right now?!"
"No, you take the game!"
"No, you take it and that's final!"
Damn.
Typical Bucs game this year.
It's such melancholy when you truly dislike both teams.
Boooooooooooooooooooooooo!! What a worthless bunch of fans their team has.
If the offense doesn't show up again next week in Seattle, they'll get smoked....
Arrington is high right now. "Wow, we like, won n stuff. This is cool. Wow. I was like, he threw it. And then I was like, wow, don't drop it. Wow. I don't know. Wow."
The only thing I can say is, the farther you get the more it hurts. Washington stands no chance next week.
wow what a suck fest of a game. like 7 fumbles. i think portis has more rushing yards then brunell did passing. and where was the godly moss at. he probably had like a good something teen good yards of offense as well.
i can't wait for next year to bring these retards back to earth.
Quote from: L-ong-B-each-I-ggle on January 07, 2006, 07:55:01 PM
wow what a suck fest of a game. like 7 fumbles. i think portis has more rushing yards then brunell did passing. and where was the godly moss at. he probably had like a good something teen good yards of offense as well.
i can't wait for next year to bring these retards back to earth.
Come on guys, a little support for your fellow NFC Easters. We will be toast next week if we can't generate any offense, we did beat Seahawks this year already, it is really tough to beat the good teams twice.
All hail Gibbs
Hail Neckbeard, you son of a bitch.
Quote from: rjs246 on January 07, 2006, 12:41:26 PM
Don't worry, he'll be gone next year when they're 6-10.
And your 2-14. :-D
Quote from: General_Failure on January 07, 2006, 08:02:26 PM
Hail Neckbeard, you son of a bitch.
I got to see neckbeard last week in person, I was yelling "all hail neckbeard" when he came in and all the Eagles fans where giving me strange looks, I was like come on people wake up
What was cool about last weeks game at the Linc is we had seats real close, like a couple rows down, from that guy that dress in full uniform and wears the Dawkins jersey and paints his face half green and silver, does he have a name?
He answers to Trashman, and "Hey midget."
Quote from: General_Failure on January 07, 2006, 08:13:50 PM
He answers to Trashman, and "Hey midget."
Do you know the guy I mean, he's real stone faced serious?
The midget in the homemade jersey. Yeah, he's a jackass.
Anyway, it was just me and my 11 year old son that went to the game and were standing along the wall in the corner of the endzone watching warm-ups and comes down and just stands there with this real serious stare watching the players warm-up. The whole time he's standing there, stadium officials and Eagles staff people on the field are walking by him and exchanging greetings with him, talking with him. Who is this guy? He looks like he's not playing with a full deck. What's the deal, does anyone know? We actually saw him before the game walking in front of McFadens' making his way to the game. Does anyone know the story on this guy? Just curious.
He's a retard that gets far too much publicity for being retarded.
95% of Eagles fans would like to kick him in the throat.
By accident, they would be aiming for his groin but miss.
The mayor of DC should throw a parade for Chris Simms
Sean Taylor might be suspended for the SEA game because of that stunt. Remember last year there was a question if he spit in a Cincy's players face or not and they couldn't tell for sure on video? I think his little bitch episode yesterday confirms that he likes to spit on peoples faces like a bitchass punk.
Brace yourselves here...but I am going to compliment the Redksins.
Their LBs won that game for them. That is the way a LB corps should play. They had 32 tackles between the 3 of them as well as FF's and INT's. I forgot what a dominant LB corps looks like.
Be nice for the Birds to get 2 OLBs to help Trot out like that, eh?
And back to my regularly scheduled bashing...
taterskins set a playoff record in offensive futility yesterday with 120 yards of offense. That is worse than the '00 Ravens!
America's next huge media mogul ART is at it again, ladies and gents (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=138318)
QuoteWell guys, some of you may be interested to know sitting next to us in the press box after the game was one ESPN.com writer named Len Pasquarelli. As I was getting my gear ready, I said, "So, Len, not too bad for an ordinary Joe, huh?"
Len was immediately rather upset . :)
I will tell this story more in detail soon, but, I thought you'd like to know Len HATES you, me, us as taterskin fans. He sees our questions during his chats on ESPN and his exact words were, "I ignore you f@ckers." Classic.
He was HIGHLY agitated. Die Hard and I kept trying to diffuse him.
The best part, of course, is, I recorded it . You never know when a guy might tell a fib about what happened in the press box .
Here's how the story goes
I'm finishing up the blog when Die Hard leans in and whispers to me, "You see the guy next to me. That's Len Pasquarelli." I looked. NO EFFING WAY. Lenny the Hutt is a gigantic squishy belly. This guy was merely a chubby, frail looking, painfully old looking man. He was small in height. Grey, thinning hair. No real resemblance to his ESPN picture. He no longer qualifies as the Hutt. He's now a Grumpy Old Man .
I can't believe it's him to be honest. I pack my stuff up and go to the rest room where I turn the audio recorder on, putting it into my pocket and walking back to the area. Grabbing my stuff, taking two steps toward Lenny and offering up my opener.
"So, Len, not too bad for an ordinary Joe, huh?"
He looks at my "Washington taterskins team official" badge and quivering a little, fingers it and says, "You work for the taterskins?" said in such a way as to mean, "Suck it." I said, "Not really. Kind of I guess." He said, "What's kind of?" I said I'm just a fan who helps run a fan site and the team lets me come along for the fun.
He said, "You're probably the site that sends all those taterskin fans to my Tuesday chats." I confirmed his suspicion, telling him, "Oh, yeah, you can bet that's us. We hate you man." To which he said, "Well you know what," little shaking hands and eye twitching, mouse like, smug, "I ignore you f@ckers."
Second edit
I laughed. This guy was RILED UP. Then he folds his arms, seems to calm momentarily and asks, "So, tell me. What was the "Ordinary Joe" comment supposed to mean?" I told him, I was just having some fun with him. He said, "Wasn't he ordinary last year?" I said he was substantially below ordinary in my view, but, that wasn't the point of his column. His column was to suggest when Gibbs was done THIS time he would be remembered as an ordinary Joe, NOT just if he struggled early.
That anger came back. "Go back and read it. Go back and read it. I wish you f@ckers would get it right. I never said the game had passed him by." I said, "I never said you did." But, he was on a roll. "I said the counter trey would still work. I said the deep-passing game would still work. I said Dan Snyder would make him fail and he'd be an ordinary Joe. Go back and do a Nessus search. No one inside the beltway can read apparently."
Well, Len, that seems unfair, as we can read, but, perhaps going from a ponderous, squishy lard butt, to a trembling ferret has caused a mental lapse. Next update will include his original story
:-D :-D :-D--Yeah, I'm sure Lenny was quivering in fear because you "work" for the taterskins, Art. :-D :-D
I'm no big Pasquarelli fan, but shouldn't Art be in trouble for doing that while the guy was trying to work? Hiding tape recorders to record the conversation? Chiding him into a discussion like that?
Real good, Art. I hope Lenny complains to the taterskins and ES's press passes are revoked.
I love all of these asshats who are saying "he never spit on him" and "I just checked my HDTV replay and never saw the spit".
Hey jerkoffs...the referee was STANDING RIGHT THERE!!!
Here's The Blog :-D (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=137268)
Quote1:10 p.m., Friday, Jan. 6 -- Guy in line asks, "Are you with the taterskins?" As I'm in gear and technically I am with the team I say "Yep." Dazzle him with my vast knowledge.
1:30 p.m., Friday, Jan. 6 -- Boarding plane. Someone says, "Go Bucs". I shout, "You must be crazy." Girl near him says, "He works for the team." Guy says, "You know him." She says, "No, I heard him talking." I have not the heart to explain I don't REALLY work for the team.
Just back here to inform you that agian you were all wrong! Once again, your opinions have been shown to be absolutely rediculous and stupid. I thought you all said we would lose our first game? Good work guys, you are very intelligent and astute football fans and analysists.
Way to go you little dripping Twat. :yay
I expected better out of the Bucs. Your defense and defense only deserves credit. That slop you call an offense is embarassing.
Quote from: twatson on January 08, 2006, 11:43:04 AM
Just back here to inform you that agian you were all wrong! Once again, your opinions have been shown to be absolutely rediculous and stupid. I thought you all said we would lose our first game? Good work guys, you are very intelligent and astute football fans and analysists.
Thanks for stopping by. :D
yay! we get to see that bonesmuggler portis dress in drag 1 more time this season.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 08, 2006, 05:43:35 AM
Sean Taylor might be suspended for the SEA game because of that stunt. Remember last year there was a question if he spit in a Cincy's players face or not and they couldn't tell for sure on video? I think his little bitch episode yesterday confirms that he likes to spit on peoples faces like a bitchass punk.
Brace yourselves here...but I am going to compliment the Redksins.
Their LBs won that game for them. That is the way a LB corps should play. They had 32 tackles between the 3 of them as well as FF's and INT's. I forgot what a dominant LB corps looks like.
Be nice for the Birds to get 2 OLBs to help Trot out like that, eh?
And back to my regularly scheduled bashing...
taterskins set a playoff record in offensive futility yesterday with 120 yards of offense. That is worse than the '00 Ravens!
Taylor won't get suspended but I hope he gets fined out the ass. I was so pissed at Mike Carey because all I saw was Pittman punch Taylor and Taylor gets ejected. If what they said was true and he did spit in Pittman's face, then he deserved to be ejected. But Pittman should have been ejected as well for throwing a punch.
But after finding out Taylor spit in Pittman's face, I was (and still am... and will be for quite some time) pissed at Taylor for almost costing us the game.
I was almost just as pissed at LaVar and Marcus for laughing when LaVar ran 10 yards into the backfield and didn't try to get back and GAVE tampon bay a first down.
But we won. And that's all that matters. It's time to clean our act up for next week.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 08, 2006, 07:04:42 AM
America's next huge media mogul ART is at it again, ladies and gents (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=138318)
:-D :-D :-D--Yeah, I'm sure Lenny was quivering in fear because you "work" for the taterskins, Art. :-D :-D
I'm no big Pasquarelli fan, but shouldn't Art be in trouble for doing that while the guy was trying to work? Hiding tape recorders to record the conversation? Chiding him into a discussion like that?
Real good, Art. I hope Lenny complains to the taterskins and ES's press passes are revoked.
I don't even read those threads. Don't waste your time Phreak.
Ugly offense. Great defense. Clean it up for next week.
A wins a win.
I farging hate the taterskins.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 08, 2006, 05:43:35 AM
Sean Taylor might be suspended for the SEA game because of that stunt. Remember last year there was a question if he spit in a Cincy's players face or not and they couldn't tell for sure on video? I think his little bitch episode yesterday confirms that he likes to spit on peoples faces like a bitchass punk.
Brace yourselves here...but I am going to compliment the Redksins.
Their LBs won that game for them. That is the way a LB corps should play. They had 32 tackles between the 3 of them as well as FF's and INT's. I forgot what a dominant LB corps looks like.
Be nice for the Birds to get 2 OLBs to help Trot out like that, eh?
And back to my regularly scheduled bashing...
taterskins set a playoff record in offensive futility yesterday with 120 yards of offense. That is worse than the '00 Ravens!
Question is, if the league doesn't suspend will Gibbs suspend him?
No. He will be fined, though.
Quote from: twatson on January 08, 2006, 11:43:04 AM
Just back here to inform you that agian you were all wrong! Once again, your opinions have been shown to be absolutely rediculous and stupid. I thought you all said we would lose our first game? Good work guys, you are very intelligent and astute football fans and analysists.
"WE" didn't win anything. The taterskins won a game. You sat in front of your tv and watched. YOU are nothing. Get a life!
Quote from: archer on January 08, 2006, 01:27:21 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 08, 2006, 05:43:35 AM
Sean Taylor might be suspended for the SEA game because of that stunt. Remember last year there was a question if he spit in a Cincy's players face or not and they couldn't tell for sure on video? I think his little bitch episode yesterday confirms that he likes to spit on peoples faces like a bitchass punk.
Brace yourselves here...but I am going to compliment the Redksins.
Their LBs won that game for them. That is the way a LB corps should play. They had 32 tackles between the 3 of them as well as FF's and INT's. I forgot what a dominant LB corps looks like.
Be nice for the Birds to get 2 OLBs to help Trot out like that, eh?
And back to my regularly scheduled bashing...
taterskins set a playoff record in offensive futility yesterday with 120 yards of offense. That is worse than the '00 Ravens!
Question is, if the league doesn't suspend will Gibbs suspend him?
williams says he loves taylor like a son, believes Taylor in saying he didn't do it, and would adopt him if he could. No way does our coaching staff suspend him. Taylor has got enough punishment. I say the league fines him $30,000+ and the team fines him 10000+ and that would be more than enough
I don't see how any of you fools doubt that he did it. Did you not see the guilty look on his face on the sideline. It was like a 3 year old who just got scolded. If he really didn't do it, he would have at least put up a little bit of a fight.
By the hammer of Thor Art is gay
Quote from: phattymatty on January 08, 2006, 02:57:23 PM
I don't see how any of you fools doubt that he did it. Did you not see the guilty look on his face on the sideline. It was like a 3 year old who just got scolded. If he really didn't do it, he would have at least put up a little bit of a fight.
You're correct, good point, I agree. If he didn't do it he would have been irate. He didn't argue.
Love your kids? Prove it by beating them.
Quote from: archer on January 07, 2006, 07:59:59 PM
Quote from: L-ong-B-each-I-ggle on January 07, 2006, 07:55:01 PM
wow what a suck fest of a game. like 7 fumbles. i think portis has more rushing yards then brunell did passing. and where was the godly moss at. he probably had like a good something teen good yards of offense as well.
i can't wait for next year to bring these retards back to earth.
Come on guys, a little support for your fellow NFC Easters. We will be toast next week if we can't generate any offense, we did beat Seahawks this year already, it is really tough to beat the good teams twice.
All hail Gibbs
stop smoking your product. or smoke way too much of it. whichever prevents more retarded posts like that. show support? haha im sure you guys were rooting the birds on in the SB last year.
Quote from: General_Failure on January 08, 2006, 04:20:19 PM
Love your kids? Prove it by beating them.
careful now, you might offend somebody.
Art's little experience with Lenny P has sportswriters blasting ExtremeSkins (http://www.sportsjournalists.com/forum/index.php/topic,21346.0.html)
:-D
I found this linked on ES and read the posts. Apparently they all know all about the ES boys and they detest them.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on January 07, 2006, 04:57:41 AMI couldn't give a shtein of what you philly fans think
Total number of posts since bigskinbauer posted this?
6
This is REAL good :-D (http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/cheap/2005/cheap1021.html)
QuoteSome media-bashers aren't so loath to be outed. The poster who goes by Art is the Wilt Chamberlain of ExtremeSkins.com—he now claims more than 21,000 posts to the Skins site alone. Art has positioned himself as more of a media attack dog than a watchdog; he goes after any journo who utters a negative word about Snyder's operation with the fervor of a scorned Scientologist. Art is the guy responsible for the Nunyo Files, and he says he'd be doing it even if the taterskins hadn't acquired the site.
"My name is Art Mills, and everybody there knows that 'Art' is Art Mills," he says. "I've been attacking bad journalism for years, before the taterskins ever knew my name, and I'll be attacking bad journalism for years to come."
Demasio says he gave his enemies fuel by erroneously reporting that the taterskins were going to cut Ryan Clark before the 2004 season, but he finds the continued attacks against him on ExtremeSkins.com rather amusing.
"As a journalist, every mistake hits like a dagger," Demasio says. "So I wish I never gave one bit of ammunition. But I still can't figure out how [the Nunyo Files were] supposed to smear me, especially after the team bought the site. If anything, it made me realize that the Washington Post got under their skins, no pun intended."
Eric Leichter, a North Dakota urologist and one of the board's previous owners, declines to discuss the financial terms of the taterskins' takeover of his board. But Leichter says he supports the site's tone just as much now as he did before it fell under Snyder's management umbrella. In fact, he joined Mills and andyman in crashing Demasio's going-away party at SportsJournalists.com. Posting on the site as "SkinBlade"—he uses "Blade" while bashing at ExtremeSkins.com—Leichter prodded anybody saying nice things about Demasio to "stop swinging from Nunyo's sack."
The Skins have rewarded Mills, who lives in Minnesota, for his anti-media venom in a very weird way. Along with getting paid for his contributions to the taterskins Web site, since Snyder's takeover of the site, Mills now gets to watch the team's games from—you guessed it—the press box, and all on the team's dime. He recounts his experiences on the site, which leads to such journalism as the following, from the press box of Texas Stadium in Irving, Texas, posted just after the Skins completed their Monday Night Miracle: "Monday, Sept. 19, Brunell to MOSS TD—Now we're obnoxious. Mediamembers looking at us. Screw them. YES BABY!!!! We sprint down to sidelines now."
Allowing representatives from the fan site, let alone brash media-bashers, to sit alongside working media in the press box troubles Dave Elfin, the longtime Washington Times reporter who now serves as president of the Pro Football Writers Association.
"I wish they were not there," says Elfin. "They have cheered in the press box, which is against every tenet of the press box. There are already disputes over fan Web sites [being given press credentials] in other markets. But in those other cases, the sites aren't owned by the team. Here, the site is owned by the team, so we really have no say who gets in the press box. It's up to the team, and they choose to let in fans disguised as journalists. It's a distressing trend."
Mills, who says he used to be a working newspaperman before going into medical-equipment sales, is the opposite of apologetic when he hears that some journalists question the validity of a paid fan reporting on games.
"We give fans an eyes-wide-open, aw-shucks view that they can't get anywhere else," he says. "Our presence is every bit as appropriate as the traditional media."
And the sportswriters views on Art and his boys (http://www.sportsjournalists.com/forum/index.php/topic,18306.0.html)
oh my, i never, ever realized he was that much of a toolbag
Oh, yeah. He's a grade A douchebag...
He has 52 posts that media MB...here's one of them;
QuotePerhaps the most disturbing thing is fans at Extremeskins, myself included, hold you gentlemen in as much disdain as you hold us. The difference being you are supposed to be serving, at least in a small way, us. We are your audience. In the end, you need us to survive. In the end, we do not need you for the same. Perhaps the fact that it's so clear you don't like fans of the beats you may cover contributes to the fact fans of those beats don't like you.
It would probably be a nice effort on your part to get as angry about factual errors among those in your profession as you get with those fans who might recognize they exist. But, that is up to you. It would probably be of benefit to you to realize when covering a sports beat, the most interested, potentially devoted audience you serve are those who actually follow the team. It is probably a poor position to hate us so and expect to be taken seriously.
As I told Moddy, I will not make a presence here, as I don't believe some large component here is willing to engage in an honest, reasonable exchange of ideas. Some might be, and to you I apologize. But, trust me when I tell you, as amused and disgusted as you are with us for liking the teams we follow, we're equally amused and disgusted with you for the failure of many of you in your field.
And we're talking about you as well.
http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=121789
I have a $100 bet with a couple members of my board that not a single ONE of you will engage in conversation as yourself in an honest, open way I have with you. They seem to think you just might. I look forward to losing the bet.
This just adds to his ego....of being popular on an internet message board. What a pathetic loser.
Can we stop talking about this douchebag? Please. Everyone outside of that web site knows that he is a joke. Half the people who go to that site know that he's a joke. we all certainly know he's a joke. I can't handle reading about him anymore and it infuriates me that his unparalleled level of blind homerism has earned national recognition. People shouldn't be talking about his stupid ass. Us included.
In other words, lets put all Art-related posts in a different thread so that when I make fun of the Skins I don't have to hear about how every sports journalist in the country knows who Art is. I dry heave enough as it is.
A co-woker just bet me $50 than the Skins will win. Straight up, no points. The homerism in this town has reached an all-time level of the 4 years that I have lived here.
Win what? The Hawks game, or the SB?
Bump that shtein to $100.
QuoteJay Glazer, of FOXSports.com, reports Washington taterskins S Sean Taylor was fined $17,000 for spitting in the face of Tampa Bay Buccaneers RB Michael Pittman during the team's Wild Card game.
What a joke. farg Taylor.
He's lucky the ref didn't see the phone he was carrying.
I hear he did see the phone, but also saw the gun Taylor was packing and decided to let it go.
He'd probably be a better player if he wasn't carrying all that crap around. Also, if he wasn't such a douche.
Better player?! Not possible. He's the bestest!
Yes, but he could be better than bestest.
Would that make him the bestester?
Quote from: phattymatty on January 09, 2006, 03:42:21 PM
Quote from: MadMarchHare on January 09, 2006, 01:06:57 PM
Win what? The Hawks game, or the SB?
The Seahawks game.
What good team has the hawks beat? Dallas and NY both had them at home. They play in a terrible division not to mention they got houston, tenn., and indy's second string. They also benefited from a injury strickened eagle and Packer team. Seattle has roughly a .43 winning % for the year (opponents are 110-146) Washingtons % is .540 (opponents of skins are 138-118)...I will agree the hawks are a good team but their schedule was extremely soft. The pukes could have won 12 games given that schedule.
Quote from: skin48 on January 09, 2006, 07:34:29 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on January 09, 2006, 03:42:21 PM
Quote from: MadMarchHare on January 09, 2006, 01:06:57 PM
Win what? The Hawks game, or the SB?
The Seahawks game.
What good team has the hawks beat? Dallas and NY both had them at home. They play in a terrible division not to mention they got houston, tenn., and indy's second string. They also benefited from a injury strickened eagle and Packer team. Seattle has roughly a .43 winning % for the year (opponents are 110-146) Washingtons % is .540 (opponents of skins are 138-118)...I will agree the hawks are a good team but their schedule was extremely soft. The pukes could have won 12 games given that schedule.
Then lay a $50 on it or shut the farg up.
You're only going to regret giving yourself hope.
Quote from: skin48 on January 09, 2006, 07:34:29 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on January 09, 2006, 03:42:21 PM
Quote from: MadMarchHare on January 09, 2006, 01:06:57 PM
Win what? The Hawks game, or the SB?
The Seahawks game.
What good team has the hawks beat? Dallas and NY both had them at home. They play in a terrible division not to mention they got houston, tenn., and indy's second string. They also benefited from a injury strickened eagle and Packer team. Seattle has roughly a .43 winning % for the year (opponents are 110-146) Washingtons % is .540 (opponents of skins are 138-118)...I will agree the hawks are a good team but their schedule was extremely soft. The pukes could have won 12 games given that schedule.
the thing is they beat everyone on that schedule no matter how easy it was. It is a factor but they are a good team regardless. They are still 3-2 to winning teams. we are 5-5 regular season and 6-5 including Tampa. basically they have beat every team on their plate. I can say they might not be as good as the hype but that doesn't mean they don't deserve credit.
Match up wise. We have been good against the run lately. If we hold shawn under 100 like last time and somehow get pressure on Matt(not gonna happen with that line) we will be fine. On offense we need to exploit the one weakness on that team; the secondary. Moss would need a field day for the skins to win but the thing is that is possible. moss can break open games, we all know that. He will need a big day and we need to play the pick your poison game with portis and moss all day. Last week we needed to establish the run game first and we didn't but this week we will need to establish the pass game first and then find running room and go back and forth. Only a perfect game plan can beat them. it will have to be flawless and the players will have to execute early on.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on January 07, 2006, 04:57:41 AMI couldn't give a shtein of what you philly fans think
Total number of posts since bigskinbauer posted this?
7
I think he likes you.
so you guys really think your teams the real deal. maybe i was wrong.. no narcotics, it must just be something in the water.
you keep clinging to that little sliver of hope that your team might actually do something this year. you know your right back to where you belong next year.
Quote from: Wingspan on January 09, 2006, 09:52:08 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on January 07, 2006, 04:57:41 AMI couldn't give a shtein of what you philly fans think
Total number of posts since bigskinbauer posted this?
7
Oh in the sense of how you feel about being wrong about everything. THe skins fans are gonna say you are wrong and none of you are gonna say 'you know what i was wrong'.
Don't you know your opinions mean the world to me? ::)
Quote from: skin48 on January 09, 2006, 07:34:29 PM
Seattle has roughly a .43 winning % for the year
I always thought that 13-3 was better than a .43 winning %. I guess you learn something new every day.
Quote from: phattymatty on January 10, 2006, 01:26:45 PM
Quote from: skin48 on January 09, 2006, 07:34:29 PM
Seattle has roughly a .43 winning % for the year
I always thought that 13-3 was better than a .43 winning %. I guess you learn something new every day.
That is their opponents winning percentage.
You should try constructing coherent sentences next time to avoid confusion.
Wussa co-herring?
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on January 09, 2006, 09:18:17 PM
QuoteWhat good team has the hawks beat? Dallas and NY both had them at home. They play in a terrible division not to mention they got houston, tenn., and indy's second string. They also benefited from a injury strickened eagle and Packer team. Seattle has roughly a .43 winning % for the year (opponents are 110-146) Washingtons % is .540 (opponents of skins are 138-118)...I will agree the hawks are a good team but their schedule was extremely soft. The pukes could have won 12 games given that schedule.
the thing is they beat everyone on that schedule no matter how easy it was. It is a factor but they are a good team regardless. They are still 3-2 to winning teams. we are 5-5 regular season and 6-5 including Tampa. basically they have beat every team on their plate. I can say they might not be as good as the hype but that doesn't mean they don't deserve credit.
Match up wise. We have been good against the run lately. If we hold shawn under 100 like last time and somehow get pressure on Matt(not gonna happen with that line) we will be fine. On offense we need to exploit the one weakness on that team; the secondary. Moss would need a field day for the skins to win but the thing is that is possible. moss can break open games, we all know that. He will need a big day and we need to play the pick your poison game with portis and moss all day. Last week we needed to establish the run game first and we didn't but this week we will need to establish the pass game first and then find running room and go back and forth. Only a perfect game plan can beat them. it will have to be flawless and the players will have to execute early on.
I think it's cute that you two mutants took a moment to pull your tongues ole' Joe's bung, but I think you forgot something. This whole post was created for us to point and make fun of you. Go to your Gibbs man love boards and discuss this shtein. Seriously, get back on topic - defending your stupid ass, phony playoff team and it's retarded fanbase.
http://media.putfile.com/Taylor-edit29
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 11, 2006, 08:10:30 AM
http://media.putfile.com/Taylor-edit29
I saw that on Sounds of the Game. It was great to hear the ref's rationale of the whole thing. He's right too. You can't expect Pittman to do nothing after he got spit on. I woulda tried to knock his ass out too.
Funny how fast Stoutmire backed off once he knew what happened.
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 11, 2006, 08:10:30 AM
http://media.putfile.com/Taylor-edit29
But everyone knows Taylor didn't spit.
That must be doctored video.
Everyone is out to get Taylor. Everyone I say.
on ES they all were saying even as of yesterday that he didnt spit...now its well he spit but it didnt even hit pittman
they also were calling for pittman to be suspened for the first game of next season
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 11, 2006, 08:42:49 AM
on ES they all were saying even as of yesterday that he didnt spit...now its well he spit but it didnt even hit pittman
they also were calling for pittman to be suspened for the first game of next season
Well, some people will always argue the homer point. ::) ;)
I'm not convinced he tried to spit on him, but with TJ last year, and the ref being right there, spitting even on the ground while you are jawing with someone is just stupid. He has to grow up a little obviously.
Good find, IGY.
A clear shot of Taylor's spit hitting him in the face. You can see some of the glob fall off of Pittman's helmet.
I also like Mike Carey's explanation about it too.
Now the ES people who were saying "No way would Sean lie to Gregg Williams!" and the more ridiculous ones who were saying that Taylor was the same as Cowher. :-D
Edit -- a few of them are blaming NFL Network for doctoring the video!!! :-D :-D
Belichick is better than Gibbs?!? Blasphemy! (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=139490)
They're mad because Mike and Mike said Belichick was better. Granted a few of them say Belichick deserves to be rated higher, but the man-love for Gibbs is nauseating.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 11, 2006, 09:52:28 AM
Belichick is better than Gibbs?!? Blasphemy! (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=139490)
They're mad because Mike and Mike said Belichick was better. Granted a few of them say Belichick deserves to be rated higher, but the man-love for Gibbs is nauseating.
It looked like it was one guy that said that. That's not much man love.
The biggest homer on that site, even bigger than Art, is bubba9497. He posted two screen shots of that and is saying that the spit never hit Pittman and that since the loogie fell down after hitting the facemask of Taylor it was wrong.
Does this guy ever spit? Does he not know that when you spit there is a spray that goes along with it...especially when you are 6 inches from a guy?
This guy likes to take screen shots and argue about them like crazy. he couldn't admit that Dawkins pick in 2004 was legit and he tried to prove it with screen shots. A total douchebag/
"Almost got me... that would've been real bad."
--Mike Carey, laying the smackdown.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 11, 2006, 09:49:58 AM
Edit -- a few of them are blaming NFL Network for doctoring the video!!! :-D :-D
I didn't believe that someone could think the NFL network doctored the video, but one guy did.
Course it was the same guy that wanted to trade Lavar for Randy Moss, so grain of salt.
What a bunch of pathetic homers. I can't stand it.
There's also the guy that said he'd take the Skins against any team in the playoffs. You really think they can beat the Colts? The Patriots? Hell, the Steelers?
stoutmire's response is priceless.
Getting no sound at work. What does he say?
Quote from: MadMarchHare on January 11, 2006, 02:12:08 PM
Getting no sound at work. What does he say?
He's all pissed about Taylor getting ejected, trying to find out what he did to deserve an ejection, while Pittman got no penalty at all. Carey says something like, "He spit, man. He spit right in his face. What would you do?" Stoutmire backed off immediately saying something like, "Oh, damn. Ok."
Quote from: MadMarchHare on January 11, 2006, 12:29:51 PM
There's also the guy that said he'd take the Skins against any team in the playoffs. You really think they can beat the Colts? The Patriots? Hell, the Steelers?
I don't think they could have beaten the Jags or Bengals.
That's not a big loogie coming from Taylor, he's too nice to do something like that.
From TMQ:
Carson Palmer, who played two snaps, had more passing yards than Mark Brunell, who played an entire game.
Quote from: methdeez on January 11, 2006, 07:10:09 PM
From TMQ:
Carson Palmer, who played two snaps, had more passing yards than Mark Brunell, who played an entire game.
:-D :-D :-D
- oh, and I'm pointing too.
Quote from: FFatPatt on January 11, 2006, 10:11:30 AM
"Almost got me... that would've been real bad."
--Mike Carey, laying the smackdown.
This guy is one of the best referees in the NFL. All the other guys cant even have a statement over 10 words without making it sound retarded somehow.
Quote from: General_Failure on January 11, 2006, 02:25:45 PM
That's not a big loogie coming from Taylor, he's too nice to do something like that.
Are you kidding? It looked like he had a mouthful of drool coming out. I woulda kicked him in the jimmy instead of punching him in the face.
Yes he's kidding, you imbecile. Look at the author of the post. Jesus.
Do you ever sit and wonder how some people manage to Magoo their way through life? Nah, you probably start drinking when thoughts like that come up.
Quote from: General_Failure on January 11, 2006, 08:04:52 PM
Do you ever sit and wonder how some people manage to Magoo their way through life?
The guy makes his living off of the people's taxes (as the song goes), too. Scary.
Quote from: General_Failure on January 11, 2006, 08:04:52 PM
Do you ever sit and wonder how some people manage to Magoo their way through life?
I read that and it made me laugh. Then I went to the fridge and got a drink. Then I read it again and still laughed. That's some quality funny right there.
Quote from: General_Failure on January 11, 2006, 08:04:52 PM
Do you ever sit and wonder how some people manage to Magoo their way through life? Nah, you probably start drinking when thoughts like that come up.
:-D That's a keeper.
the end. as bad as the hawks played you still lost. pipedream over.
(http://images.nfl.com/photos/img9165423.jpg)
:-D :-D :-D
taterskin Season Pronounced Dead on 1/14/06 at 7:38 pm.
:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
Congratulations to the AFC for another Superbowl victory.
NO doubt about it.
Here's a shocker...
Skins fans are crying about the refs.
I know that surprises all of you. Admit it.
Somewhere in New England, a bitter man with a miserable attitude is staring at a bulging football boner. Probably his own.
Can we keep this thread open long enough to see what/who they miss drafting because they traded away their first round pick for that stud Jason Campbell? And how they will lose Arrington, have the inevitable contract squabbles with Moss, and Taylor? This thread is going to be soooooo quiet now. :-D
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 14, 2006, 07:41:45 PM
Here's a shocker...
Skins fans are crying about the refs.
I know that surprises all of you. Admit it.
Shocked! SHOCKED I say!
skin fans complain about the refs when they WIN
that said they had a good season and if and when they ever get a qb look out...cause thats the only thing keeping them from being the best team in the conference
Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC on January 14, 2006, 07:42:46 PM
Can we keep this thread open long enough to see what/who they miss drafting because they traded away their first round pick for that stud Jason Campbell? And how they will lose Arrington, have the inevitable contract squabbles with Moss, and Taylor? This thread is going to be soooooo quiet now. :-D
Someone will have to start a new thread after the Pro Bowl. 2006: Point & Laugh At The taterskins Thread
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 14, 2006, 07:44:29 PM
skin fans complain about the refs when they WIN
that said they had a good season and if and when they ever get a qb look out...cause thats the only thing keeping them from being the best team in the conference
Great, now I'm going to wake up in a cold sweat at nights having nightmares about them signing Mike McMahon.
And the crying is getting worse.
Not only are they bitching about the refs but now they are crying about the announcers and saying the NFL is rigged.
This is why I loathe taterskin fans. Goddamn whiney ass bitches, those people.
I'm worried about Art.
try living with them...and then welcome yourself to hell on earth
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 14, 2006, 07:44:29 PM
skin fans complain about the refs when they WIN
that said they had a good season and if and when they ever get a qb look out...cause thats the only thing keeping them from being the best team in the conference
Not so, IGY. Everyone towards the end of the season where hip to how they were going to use Moss, he got his catches, but the huge plays dissappeared. I still maintain he isn't a true #1 receiver, and after him they have zip at WR. Then came Cooley, who is awesome, no doubt, but he is a TE/H-Back, not really a gamebreaker. They still have to address the DE spot somehow. Portis started to fall apart towards the end of the season, and finally their QB situation is feeble. My money is on Gibbs bringing back Brunnel to start again next year. Finally, depth, depth, and depth. And they have almost zero cap room. Good luck Foreskins fans! :yay
Hopefully some Seahawk fan will beat his ass.
Him and his boys went to a gay bar. He said it in his blog. :-D Some website guy for the Skins sent their group to a sausage convention. :-D
They probably didn't mind.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 14, 2006, 07:51:56 PM
Hopefully some Seahawk fan will beat his ass.
Him and his boys went to a gay bar. He said it in his blog. :-D Some website guy for the Skins sent their group to a sausage convention. :-D
Well... at least he can blow God Gibbs without anybody judging him.
Are you kidding? They'll judge him on technique.
Get real. Art's the farging pole smoking mastah! He's got his technique down... don't be ticklin' or nothin'!
Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC on January 14, 2006, 07:50:51 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 14, 2006, 07:44:29 PM
skin fans complain about the refs when they WIN
that said they had a good season and if and when they ever get a qb look out...cause thats the only thing keeping them from being the best team in the conference
Not so, IGY. Everyone towards the end of the season where hip to how they were going to use Moss, he got his catches, but the huge plays dissappeared. I still maintain he isn't a true #1 receiver, and after him they have zip at WR. Then came Cooley, who is awesome, no doubt, but he is a TE/H-Back, not really a gamebreaker. They still have to address the DE spot somehow. Portis started to fall apart towards the end of the season, and finally their QB situation is feeble. My money is on Gibbs bringing back Brunnel to start again next year. Finally, depth, depth, and depth. And they have almost zero cap room. Good luck Foreskins fans! :yay
And (everyone say it with me)
no first round pick! ;D
Skins need more than a QB.
They need an imaginative play-caller (exactly how many bubble screens can you run in one game?).
They need another WR. Santana Moss is good, but Taylor Jacobs is garbage. James Thrash sucks and getting David Patten back isn't exactly something to look forward to.
They also need a pass rush. As good as the cast of misfits played along that DL this year Demetric Evans, Renaldo Wynn, Joe Salavea, Cedric Killings and Phillip Daniels scare no one. Their only good DL is Cornelius Griffin. They also need some secondary help.
cap room is irreleveant to the skins...theyve been in 'cap hell' since 1998...when i see proof that they are indeed in cap trouble i will then believe it
other than qb they have top to bottom a better roster than the eagles...a MUCH better coach...
qb - eagles
rb - skins
fb - skins
ol - skins
wr - skins
dl - skins
lb - skins
cb - eagles
s - skins
k - eagles
homer it up any way you wish but the skins have a better team OTHER than qb...and i fully admit thats a huge other than...but as soon as they upgrade at that position they fly by the eagles...even with the qb advantage the eagles arent that much better
all is right in the world again. this place has been like a ghost town for the last few hours. now everyone is wasted and mad. its great.
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 14, 2006, 08:06:25 PM
qb - eagles
cb - eagles
k - eagles
homer it up any way you wish but the skins have a better team OTHER than qb
:sly
Hail to the taterskins!! Hail to sucking the big one!!
I honestly don't care about the NFL playoffs anymore. The Skins lost, and the Pats lost. But its more important that they Skins lost.
The best part about it is that this is it for the Skins. This lucky playoff berth was their shot and it's over now. Back to the NFC East basement again next year. They are the biggest frauds.
An updated version of the 'Skins fight song:
To Hell with the taterskins!
No Victory!
Squaws on the Warpath!
Whine for old D.C.!
Trip or hold and bore us -- we want a whole lot more!
Trip 'em, Spit on 'em,
Fourth down! -- Let the points for the other team soar!
Whine on, whine on 'Til the flags go your way
Sons of (blankety-blank). Bah!, Bah!, Bah!
To hell with the taterskins!
No Victory!
Squaws on the Warpath!
Whine for old D.C.!
This is a great thread over on extremeskins.
QuoteWho Else Cried?
I balled tonight. I was able to take with my girlfriend until late night. But then I broke down like a little boy and cried in front of her. I don't care. Who else is with me?
Call me a Traitter, but I'll be damned if I didn't find myself rooting for the taterskins in the postseason. I don't know if its fantasy football softening me up a bit, or that I was the first one in North America to call for the return of Joe Gibbs to coaching in the NFL, but I was pullin for them in the same sort of sick way that Lynette was happy for Paula when Richard Gere swept her off the factory floor in his dress whites, even though her guy swallowed the ring and hung himself, just like the Eagles .... :paranoid
Hey, I give the Skins props for going on the road against a quality QB like Chris Simms and getting their first playoff win since I graduated high school. Way to go for them. MAD props. Woooo hoooooooo.
Hahahahahahaha. taterskins suck.
Quote from: phattymatty on January 15, 2006, 08:11:01 AM
This is a great thread over on extremeskins.
QuoteWho Else Cried?
I balled tonight. I was able to take with my girlfriend until late night. But then I broke down like a little boy and cried in front of her. I don't care. Who else is with me?
ES has been a gold mine so far today. Enjoyment for me.
We have the crying thread, people blasting Gibbs only to be beaten down by the Gibbs lovers, saying trading Champ was dumb because Portis sucks and other topics.
They put up 10 points after getting 3 turnovers. And then knocked the league MVP out of the game and they still lost.
ill say it again if they get a qb they are gonna be for real...luckily they are in a very tricky situation...they are a mad race for a sb before gibbs retires...and they have a sick dog in brunnell who is clearly done but he is a born again buddy of the zealot coach..so how does he not get the job...
then you have the young number one pick who clearly will not be ready for at least a couple more years
i guess they could go in the middle and start (and stick with) ramsey...but the way theyve played with his head who knows if hell ever be right
i have a feeling they are going to be in this qb quagmire...yeah i said quagmire bite me....for about three years and when they finally see the light at the end of tunnel it will be time for the gawd gibbs to retire
While I agree with your assessment on the QB situation, I think they have problems that are just as bad as that. Like I said yesterday - they need a pass rusher or two. They also need to get an offensive guru in there.
Gibbs' offense is terrible. And he's a terrible playcaller. Reid is ripped for his playcalling but Gibbs deserves heat too. He redefined dink and dunk, man. Even if he had a potent QB he'd still be running that junk that he does.
They'll have some cap decisions to make and they don't believe in the draft. And even if they did believe in the draft they have no #1.
(http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20060115/capt.sea13801150205.taterskins_seahawks_football_sea138.jpg)
the skins dink and dunk cause they have a qb who cant throw the ball more than ten yards
with a horrible qb they were in the top 5 in every offfensive category in the conference...they have probowlers at every skill position...if they get a good qb in the middle of all that imagine what they will do
yes they need some edge rushers...but compare their d without a pass rush to the eagles d without a pass rush...taterskins d is a top ten unit in the nfl without that...i think their bigger problem on d is the cornerbacks...springs is done and if rogers doesnt develop they are in trouble there...but defense is the least of their problems...it will be more than good enough to get to the sb
bottom line is every team in the nfl has spots theat could use imporvement...in my opinion the taterskins have fewer than most...IF they get a qb
Good point about the CBs. They have nothing at CB other than Springs and hope for Rogers.
We'll see though. I just don't see it as much as you do. I think there was a lot of smoke and mirrors there.
Quote from: phattymatty on January 15, 2006, 08:11:01 AM
This is a great thread over on extremeskins.
QuoteWho Else Cried?
I balled tonight. I was able to take with my girlfriend until late night. But then I broke down like a little boy and cried in front of her. I don't care. Who else is with me?
Cried?
:-D
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 14, 2006, 08:06:25 PM
cap room is irreleveant to the skins...theyve been in 'cap hell' since 1998...when i see proof that they are indeed in cap trouble i will then believe it
That's because they've stunk over the years. They had no problems letting guys like Stephen Davis, Trotter, Coles, Bailey, and others go because "they were losing with them, may as well lose without them".
But now since they've posted this winning record, they'll try to keep those guys that helped them win. I believe with their tenuous cap situation, they'll have problems keeping the core.
Then there are always the unforseen events....
They signed Moss, their offensive MVP, to a modest contract...$5m SB. Compared to the overpaid Portis, Samuels, Arrington, and even Brunell, his money is piddling. Will he want to renegotiate? (Please tell me Rosenhaus is his agent).
Cooley makes about 200k a year. Think he may want a pay hike?
And Sean Taylor, who was supposed to join Owens and Javon Walker in the Rosenhaus' holdout express, has wanted a new deal even since he discovered Winslow signed for more money. He would've held out last season had his ass not been arrested.. He'll either a) ask for a raise, or b) be in jail.
Then there's the LaVar situation...Can they afford to even cut him?
The Skins were built for short-term windows. I think theirs has closed.
They had no problems letting guys like Stephen Davis, Trotter, Coles, Bailey, and others go because "they were losing with them
they didnt just let these guys go because of money they replaced them with newer and better parts
baily for portis to replace davis
coles for moss
trotter they signed for huge money and then let go because he sucked and antonio pierce was a better player sitting behind him
never have the skins been in a position where they couldnt keep good players and at the same time were unable to go out and replace them with another good player
guaranteed somehow with less money they will be more active in free agency this year than the eagles
my point is none of this matters if they dont have a qb and i dont think they will until and if campbell pans out in about three years
From Art's playground...
QuoteI loathe statements like this without some careful consideration as to why the last few games Brunell has seemed anything less than extraordinary. Anyone who follows the team can make the logical correlation that the injury to Randy Thomas and the subsequent adjustments that were required to already thin reserves was a prime reason for his recent struggles. Let's factor in aggressive defenses from not one, but two very good defensive playoff teams. If a Hall of Fame coach has faith in Mark Brunell, then don't you owe it to yourself as a loyal fan to trust that he's got the player who best gives us a chance to win on the field? :-D :-D :-D 11 games up, 7 games down.
Get off the bandwagon of revellers who are calling for Brunell's head. This is a team sport where the actions of 11 players have to operate as one, synergous unit. For my money, Mark Brunell more than answered the call for his part.
I absolutely love Extremeskins.com. I'm hungover and felt like shtein, but sure enough, I go over there and read something like this and just started laughing hysterically.
Just awesome. :yay
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on January 15, 2006, 12:16:00 PM
From Art's playground...
QuoteI loathe statements like this without some careful consideration as to why the last few games Brunell has seemed anything less than extraordinary. Anyone who follows the team can make the logical correlation that the injury to Randy Thomas and the subsequent adjustments that were required to already thin reserves was a prime reason for his recent struggles. Let's factor in aggressive defenses from not one, but two very good defensive playoff teams. If a Hall of Fame coach has faith in Mark Brunell, then don't you owe it to yourself as a loyal fan to trust that he's got the player who best gives us a chance to win on the field? :-D :-D :-D 11 games up, 7 games down.
Get off the bandwagon of revellers who are calling for Brunell's head. This is a team sport where the actions of 11 players have to operate as one, synergous unit. For my money, Mark Brunell more than answered the call for his part.
I absolutely love Extremeskins.com. I'm hungover and felt like shtein, but sure enough, I go over there and read something like this and just started laughing hysterically.
Just awesome. :yay
If you truly "undertsand" this guy then you know we have to pass more than 53 times/game :-D
I'm still walking around with a chubby thinking about the Skins losing yesterday and their delusional fans crying into their beer like a bunch of bitches.
The highlight of that game for me was the "human water fountain" trying to drop the boom on DJax on the sideline and laying himself out. :-D
I was screaming for DJax to get up, look down... and spit on his ass. >:D
Anyone seen Bigskinbauer, skin48, qwert or my buddy Twat lately?
Can't imagine where they could be. Probably church.
(http://www.nfl.com/u/photos/pl_226700.jpg)
What did I ever do to you, Jesus?
QuoteHey all.
It was great to see everyone out at the game yesterday. I enjoyed meeting everyone at the tailgate. Thanks to Mark and everyone else for arranging things.
I want to personally apologize for the wanna-be-Philadelphia-no-class-Seahawks-fans that turned out yesterday. Those of you that were there remember the smoke bomb that was thrown at us, hitting Park City Skins on the leg and gassing our fans with Chris Cooley's parents in attendance. I had several things thrown at me, as did several other people.
I expected the Seattle crowd to be rowdy, but many things yesterday were unexcusable. It makes me remember why I'm a taterskins fan in the first place: We have class. Our owner owns his own stadium. Our fans are passionate, but FedEx is a safe place for adults, kids and the elderly. We've "been there" and we know how to act.
Humble success is always the best revenge. Thank you, Joe Gibbs, for bringing us this far. Hail to the taterskins forever, and may Seahawks fans get what they ultimately deserve.
Yeah, nothing ever happens at FedEx.
Police don't shoot off OC spray in the crowd. No fights ever happen. It is a goddamn utopia there in good ol' FedEx. :-D
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 15, 2006, 06:57:36 PMYeah, nothing ever happens at FedEx.
Police don't shoot off OC spray in the crowd. No fights ever happen. It is a goddamn utopia there in good ol' FedEx. :-D
There were a few skin fan tailgates at the last game there was actually one group that had a checkered tablecloth, bottle of wine & cheese tray and looked positively aghast at the surroundings. :-[
:-D
You should've mooned 'em just for the helluva it.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 15, 2006, 04:35:51 PM
Anyone seen Bigskinbauer, skin48, qwert or my buddy Twat lately?
Depressed the team I follow couldn't show up on offense. Besides, there's nothing to say. The team had a great run to end the season. 6 in a row including a wildcard win.
But seriously, the Eagles have nothing to be ashamed of after Saturdays game. They should hold their heads high after a fine, fine season. :P
(http://pages.britishlibrary.net/tooting/images/guest_point_finger.jpg)
:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
(http://cabcalvinandhobbes.tripod.com/ChPictureGallery/calvinhobbes_laughing.jpg)
Quote from: Geowhizzer on January 16, 2006, 09:36:06 AM
(http://cabcalvinandhobbes.tripod.com/ChPictureGallery/calvinhobbes_laughing.jpg)
i agree
QuoteHeadlines That Are Probably in Newspapers This Morning ...
Washington: "taterskins left to wonder if Week 2 watercooler dousing of Joe Gibbs was perhaps a bit premature"
:yay
from todays washington post:
The taterskins stand about $18 million over the salary cap, league sources said, and although they can restructure several contracts to trim that figure, tough decisions loom. The taterskins are not in 'salary cap hell' as some have suggested, but do not have oodles of cap space with which to upgrade.
their advantage is in the fact that they have no free agents of any consequence that they need to resign...i fully expect them to get either or both of one of the best de's and wr's on the market
i swear lil danni pays off the league
O i am still here.
From Schneed10 at the warpath
-------------------------------
Salary Cap $ Scheduled in 2006: $109.6 million
Expected NFL Salary Cap Limit: $93 million
Expected Cuts - Cap Savings:
Brandon Noble - $1.7 million
Walt Harris - $2 million
Matt Bowen - $2 million
Corey Raymer - $1 million
Antonio Brown - $450,000
Jimmy Farris - $450,000
Derrick Frost - $450,000
Total Cap Savings from Cuts: $8 million
Salary Cap $ Scheduled in 2006 after Cuts: $101.6 million
Expected Trades/Post June 1 Cuts - Cap Savings
Patrick Ramsey - $2.2 million
Lavar Arrington - $7 million
Total Cap Savings from Trades/Post June 1 Cuts: $9.2 million
Salary Cap $ Scheduled in 2006 after Cuts, Trades, Post June 1 Cuts: $92.4 million
Roster Bonuses Restructured - Cap Savings
(assuming 2006 roster bonuses are restructured to become signing bonuses pro-rated for the remaining length of the current contract)
Sean Taylor: $1.8 million
Clinton Portis: $2.5 million
Casey Rabach: $1.5 million
Shawn Springs: $2.5 million
Cornelius Griffin: $2.0 million
Marcus Washington: $1.9 million
Chris Samuels: $3.7 million
Total Cap Savings from Roster Bonus Restructures: $15.9 million
Salary Cap $ Scheduled in 2006 after Cuts, Trades, Post June 1 Cuts, and Roster Bonus Restructures: $76.5 million
Projected Cap: $93 million
Expected Cap Room for Signing Free Agents, Draft Picks, and any Contract Extensions beyond Roster Bonus Restructures: $16.5 million
------------------------------------------
Your right, Danny boy must pay of the league.
I'd have to get some clarification on this, but I believe that the June 1st rule this year is null and void if they do not get a new CBA in place by then.
I'll check with that AdamJT13 guy. He is the net's best capologist. He also is the guy who gets about 95% of the comp pick projections right.
Ah yes... keep pushing off those roster bonus for future years. At least you won't have to worry about the salary cap room needed to sign a #1 pick, right? So you have that going for you, which is nice.
They've been pushing RB's back for years now. I can't wait to see when they finally hit that cap hell from doing it so much.
Hell, the ink wasn't even dry on Trot's deal there and they had to restructure it. Same with Samuels too.
Skins still paying Trotter next year? :-D
Plus, that's a lot of depth they're losing. Are they counting on some combo of Brunell/Campbell to be the starting QB? Are they really going to let Arrington walk after the beastly game he had against TB in the playoffs?
Quote from: MURP on January 17, 2006, 02:45:26 PM
Skins still paying Trotter next year? :-D
no everyone gets a turn. we are paying for the dallas LBs now. We pay 1.66 million to Mike barrow next yearl.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on January 17, 2006, 02:51:49 PM
We pay 1.66 million to Mike barrow next yearl.
Now
that's funny. Good thing you guys didn't re-sign that dead weight Antonio Pierce, btw. He sucks.
it doesnt matter who they pay and when they pay him
they ALWAYS havre the money to sign who they want when they want
Great, they'll have plenty of room to sign Arrington after they cut him.
Quote from: FFatPatt on January 17, 2006, 02:53:47 PMGood thing you guys didn't re-sign that dead weight Antonio Pierce, btw. He sucks.
Lemar Marshall in the middle did just as well. I liked Pierce, but he wanted too much money. So be it.
When the Eagles let "one good playoffs" Burgess go it's restraint against overpaying for a player. When the taterskins let one good year Pierce go, it's a bad move. ???
Nah, man. The Eagles are getting KILLED up here for letting Burgess walk.
Lemar Marshall in the middle did just as well
no
Nah, man. The Eagles are getting KILLED up here for letting Burgess walk
for real....only homers say the eagles couldnt/shouldnt have kept him
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 17, 2006, 02:44:35 PM
They've been pushing RB's back for years now. I can't wait to see when they finally hit that cap hell from doing it so much.
Hell, the ink wasn't even dry on Trot's deal there and they had to restructure it. Same with Samuels too.
As some people like to say, Cash Creates Cap. This salary cap hell is like a mirage in the desert. I used to think it would happen. But after 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years of hearing this? I'm pretty sure it will never happen the way people think it will. The lack of a CBA could be a problem, but even then, they'll probably find a way.
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 17, 2006, 03:43:45 PM
Lemar Marshall in the middle did just as well
no
Nah, man. The Eagles are getting KILLED up here for letting Burgess walk
for real....only homers say the eagles couldnt/shouldnt have kept him
I also liked Pierce better, but Marshall did fine calling the formations for the first year.
And I'm talking about as it was happening for the Burgess situation. He didn't look like he deserved the money at the time.
Neither did AP. He wanted too much money.
Did you guys know that Lemar Marshall was on the Eagles once upon a time? He was a safety back in '99 on the practice squad.
IGY,
I'm one of those who didn't really mind Burgess walking. Homer or not, I thought the Raiders forked over a lot of $$$ for a guy who hadn't been healthy in 3 years and only had that one good post-season. I would've liked him to stay but at the money they gave him I was OK with him walking. He had potential and we saw what it was this year. But I can guarantee you that had they matched the Raiders offer or exceeded it and he got hurt again they'd be getting ripped for signing an injury prone guy. He went balls out this year for sure. But I have a hard time ripping them for letting him walk strictly because of the injury situation.
2001 - Good ala Cole this year.
2002 - broken foot
2003 - torn achilles
2004 - separated sternum
2005 - stud
2006 - ?
I think your boy Cole is going to be a monster though.
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on January 17, 2006, 02:39:17 PM
O i am still here.
From Schneed10 at the warpath
-------------------------------
Salary Cap $ Scheduled in 2006: $109.6 million
Expected NFL Salary Cap Limit: $93 million
Expected Cuts - Cap Savings:
Brandon Noble - $1.7 million
Walt Harris - $2 million
Matt Bowen - $2 million
Corey Raymer - $1 million
Antonio Brown - $450,000
Jimmy Farris - $450,000
Derrick Frost - $450,000
Total Cap Savings from Cuts: $8 million
Salary Cap $ Scheduled in 2006 after Cuts: $101.6 million
Expected Trades/Post June 1 Cuts - Cap Savings
Patrick Ramsey - $2.2 million
Lavar Arrington - $7 million
Total Cap Savings from Trades/Post June 1 Cuts: $9.2 million
Salary Cap $ Scheduled in 2006 after Cuts, Trades, Post June 1 Cuts: $92.4 million
Roster Bonuses Restructured - Cap Savings
(assuming 2006 roster bonuses are restructured to become signing bonuses pro-rated for the remaining length of the current contract)
Sean Taylor: $1.8 million
Clinton Portis: $2.5 million
Casey Rabach: $1.5 million
Shawn Springs: $2.5 million
Cornelius Griffin: $2.0 million
Marcus Washington: $1.9 million
Chris Samuels: $3.7 million
Total Cap Savings from Roster Bonus Restructures: $15.9 million
Salary Cap $ Scheduled in 2006 after Cuts, Trades, Post June 1 Cuts, and Roster Bonus Restructures: $76.5 million
Projected Cap: $93 million
Expected Cap Room for Signing Free Agents, Draft Picks, and any Contract Extensions beyond Roster Bonus Restructures: $16.5 million
------------------------------------------
Your right, Danny boy must pay of the league.
Nice math, dude. Except, when they restructure those roster bonuses, some of it will count against this year. I'm too lazy, and don't care, to look up the lengths of each of their remaining contracts, but that 15.9 MM number is bullshtein. Probably closer to half that, which leaves you under, but not 16MM under.
First off, that 'trade' of Arrington is not going to happen. Who the hell is going to pick up that contract?
He will be cut if anything, which will take that $7 mill in savings and turn it into many millions of hurt.
trade/cut = same impact on cap
The Skins will be paying Arrington to play somewhere else next year where he will win DPOTY and go to the Pro Bowl. Skins fans REJOICE!!
Get Arrington! And Witherspoon! And Greenway! Yay linebackers!
Quote from: FFatPatt on January 17, 2006, 04:18:12 PM
trade/cut = same impact on cap
So why does douche have 7 mill in savings on the old cap there?
IGY,
I'm one of those who didn't really mind Burgess walking. Homer or not
i dont think youre a homer for that
i wanted him kept bad...i felt stronger about him than cole...at the same time im not gonna sit here and say that i said it was a bad move at the time nor will i hate on them for it now...but to me thats the kind of decision that seperates the good front offices from the great ones and they FO is not immune to criticism for the burgess move
the homers are the ones that say even now theres no way they could have signed him and that it was a good move no matter how many sacks he had
Obviously, whatever he's getting paid, he earned his paycheck this year. 16 sacks is a huge season.
It was a gamble that paid off. The Raiders were bound to have a FA move work in their favor some day.
Burgess was the beneficiary of offensive lines double and triple teaming Warren Sapp. 'Cause he's awesome.
Quote from: methdeez on January 17, 2006, 04:32:05 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on January 17, 2006, 04:18:12 PM
trade/cut = same impact on cap
So why does douche have 7 mill in savings on the old cap there?
His cap number is around 12 mil. 6.5 of it is in a roster bonus due 7/1 or 7/15, I can't remember. The other half mil is probably the base salary.
Cut him/trade him before then, there you go.
There's a lot of loose talk about him restructuring again, so who knows. The cap number is about the same whether they cut him or keep him. My guess is he'll still be a taterskin next year.
QuoteMichael C. Wright, of the Daily Press, reports the Washington taterskins don't have a first-round pick in the 2006 NFL Draft, but head coach Joe Gibbs said he spoke strategy with team owner Dan Snyder Monday, Jan. 16, and making a trade for a first-round pick is not out of the question.
They might be able to trade Arrington and a 2nd for a 1st. MAYBE.
Probably not, though.
The days of getting a first round pick for arrington are long gone, even with a 2nd rounder thrown in there.
Arrington and all their current 2006 picks for Seattle's 1st rounder, maybe.
arrington won't get traded easily because teams would have to pick up his contract.
On Marshall. I would take Marshall at the price we pay him over antonio and the money he wanted anyday. Lamar has been called our defensive MVP and our defense is not a bad defense. Marcus Washington is our MVP in my opinion but Lamar has been extremely dominant this year for us. Pierce is better but the price difference favors Lamar
That just means Lemar's going to see dollar signs sooner, rather than later.
I was thinking about this a couple months ago, RE: whether or not the Eagles screwed-up royally by letting Burgess walk.
If Burgess continues to produce at that level, he's a steal at that contract...but, if he suffers a career-ending injury next Summer (which isn't out of the question, given his history) and the Raiders need to take the cap-hit for that large of a salary, will people still say the Eagles screwed up? $17.5 mil with a $6 mil signing bonus would still seem like a lot of money to eat for one excellent season, IF it worked out that way.
Of course, if he puts up another year like this year on that salary, the Raiders have made an excellent signing, and the Eagles will look bad for not assuming the risk. But, until that occurs, I think the jury is still out.
Quote from: jeffreyjpa on January 17, 2006, 06:48:42 PM
I was thinking about this a couple months ago, RE: whether or not the Eagles screwed-up royally by letting Burgess walk.
If Burgess continues to produce at that level, he's a steal at that contract...but, if he suffers a career-ending injury next Summer (which isn't out of the question, given his history) and the Raiders need to take the cap-hit for that large of a salary, will people still say the Eagles screwed up? $17.5 mil with a $6 mil signing bonus would still seem like a lot of money to eat for one excellent season, IF it worked out that way.
Of course, if he puts up another year like this year on that salary, the Raiders have made an excellent signing, and the Eagles will look bad for not assuming the risk. But, until that occurs, I think the jury is still out.
You can only go off of what you've seen from a player when determining the type of contract you want to pay him. And the info that the Eagles had was a bunch of injuries that led to a gazillion missed games. I don't think it was ever a question of talent with Burgess. The Eagles knew he had it otherwise I don't think they would have left him hang around for as long as he did. But it simply came down to durability and the Eagles weren't willing to take a gamble on his durability.
I don't care if Burgess goes on to break the NFL sack record, I still won't hold a grudge against the Eagles FO for letting him walk. The Raiders were/still are a desperate team and need to overpay free agents to get them into that shteinhole. The Eagles were coming off a SB/4 consecutive NFCCG/4 Division titles/5 playoff appearances. They don't need to overpay a player dramatically to entice them to stay or play in Philly.
Fair points...
I wasn't really even speaking of myself, I thought it was a good move at the time, based on his injury history and what the Raiders were willing to pay him. I can't really now re-write my own opinion that the move sucked because he miraculously stayed on the field and had 16 sacks this year.
My point was more that a $6 million signing bonus isn't validated by one 16 sack season. I was speaking more of those--especially in the media--who have constantly been harping on the Eagles FO blowing the Burgess decision. Even if you're making that argument, I think it's too early until he puts up at least two healthy and productive seasons on this contract. Given his injury history, two healthy seasons is hardly a foregone conclusion.
Mike Wilbon to a Skins fan in his chat;
QuoteSilver Spring, Md.: Wilbon, I've been reading your chats and columns all year and I think its time you moved back to Chicago. Or at least stop covering the taterskins, whom you obviously hate. I have never seen more animous directed at a team from a hometown columnist, even if they are a transplant from the Midwest. With that said, what are our chances of picking up Randle El?
Michael Wilbon: Shut up. I picked the taterskins at the beginning of the season to go 9-7, so how much could I hate them. You sound like a whining fan who is upset his team lost and now you have to lash out like a 12-year-old. Get a life
:-D
And what the hell is "animous"?
Gotta love a reporter opening his response with "Shut up." :-D
Wilbon cracks me the hell up. Hiim and Kornheiser together on PTI is pure genious. Both very knowledgeble and entertaining.
Wilbon's a farging idiot, but that was pretty good stuff.
(http://taterskin-roadtrips.com/phpBB2/files/the-future_721.jpg)
how lame
What's lame is that dude's farging soul patch. Christ.
Is that at an Eagles game?
What's lame is that dude doesn't have beer on him and all of his limbs are intact.
We gots a reputation to protect, yo!
No, those are Seahawk hats.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 17, 2006, 07:59:25 PM
Is that at an Eagles game?
Nah, that's in Seattle. Check out the dude with the poncho on his head directly infront of the kid. He's got Starbucks and Berkenstocks written all over him.
Lamar has been extremely dominant this year for us.
classic
extremely dominant...lololol...put down the pipe homie
Pierce is better but the price difference favors Lamar
so lamar marshall was "extremely dominant" but pierce was better...what comes after extremely dominant?
for now on its not lamar marshall...marshall...or lamar...its lamar "extremely dominant" marshall
in fact were i a skins fan id get a #98 jersey with "extremely dominant" on the back
Quote from: Sgt PSN on January 17, 2006, 08:02:51 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 17, 2006, 07:59:25 PM
Is that at an Eagles game?
Nah, that's in Seattle. Check out the dude with the poncho on his head directly infront of the kid. He's got Starbucks and Berkenstocks written all over him.
:-D
Good point.
Burgess could've gone the same route as Barber. Barber signed for big bucks, has missed a lot of time in KC. He turned out a fine performance this season. Good for him. He could have just as easily torn another something and missed most of the season, like he did 3 TIMES with us.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 17, 2006, 07:18:39 PM
Mike Wilbon to a Skins fan in his chat;
QuoteSilver Spring, Md.: Wilbon, I've been reading your chats and columns all year and I think its time you moved back to Chicago. Or at least stop covering the taterskins, whom you obviously hate. I have never seen more animous directed at a team from a hometown columnist, even if they are a transplant from the Midwest. With that said, what are our chances of picking up Randle El?
Michael Wilbon: Shut up. I picked the taterskins at the beginning of the season to go 9-7, so how much could I hate them. You sound like a whining fan who is upset his team lost and now you have to lash out like a 12-year-old. Get a life
:-D
And what the hell is "animous"?
It's supposed to be animus. A pretentious way to say animosity.
Quote from: MURP on January 17, 2006, 05:21:15 PM
QuoteMichael C. Wright, of the Daily Press, reports the Washington taterskins don't have a first-round pick in the 2006 NFL Draft, but head coach Joe Gibbs said he spoke strategy with team owner Dan Snyder Monday, Jan. 16, and making a trade for a first-round pick is not out of the question.
Sweet. Now they won't have first round pick for 2007 and 2008.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 17, 2006, 08:20:04 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on January 17, 2006, 08:02:51 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 17, 2006, 07:59:25 PM
Is that at an Eagles game?
Nah, that's in Seattle. Check out the dude with the poncho on his head directly infront of the kid. He's got Starbucks and Berkenstocks written all over him.
:-D
Good point.
I lived in Seattle for 3.5 years. I can spot those hippy, tree hugging, berkenstock wearing, Starbucks drinking, save the whales advocating, psuedo intellectuals anywhere.
So all the Seattle chicks were au natural no deoderant using greenpeacers?
Quote from: methdeez on January 17, 2006, 08:53:14 PM
Quote from: MURP on January 17, 2006, 05:21:15 PM
QuoteMichael C. Wright, of the Daily Press, reports the Washington taterskins don't have a first-round pick in the 2006 NFL Draft, but head coach Joe Gibbs said he spoke strategy with team owner Dan Snyder Monday, Jan. 16, and making a trade for a first-round pick is not out of the question.
Sweet. Now they won't have first round pick for 2007 and 2008.
I could easily believe that Snyder and Gibbs will continually do that until they retire, then whatever lousy farg gets the team is screwed.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 17, 2006, 08:59:40 PM
So all the Seattle chicks were au natural no deoderant using greenpeacers?
Not all of them, but there were definately enough out there to give Yeti sasquatch centerfolds for years to come.
Like every city in the country, Seattle had it's fair share of hotties. The one nice thing about it out there is that since so many people are into fitness and healthy eating, there were far less fatties to worry about. Lots of nice, well toned bodies.
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 17, 2006, 08:13:32 PM
Lamar has been extremely dominant this year for us.
classic
extremely dominant...lololol...put down the pipe homie
Pierce is better but the price difference favors Lamar
so lamar marshall was "extremely dominant" but pierce was better...what comes after extremely dominant?
for now on its not lamar marshall...marshall...or lamar...its lamar "extremely dominant" marshall
in fact were i a skins fan id get a #98 jersey with "extremely dominant" on the back
I just spit Mountain Dew all over my keyboard. Making fun of skins fans is more fun that petting baby rabbits with an axe handle......hard. :yay
Quote from: Sgt PSN on January 17, 2006, 08:54:41 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 17, 2006, 08:20:04 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on January 17, 2006, 08:02:51 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 17, 2006, 07:59:25 PM
Is that at an Eagles game?
Nah, that's in Seattle. Check out the dude with the poncho on his head directly infront of the kid. He's got Starbucks and Berkenstocks written all over him.
:-D
Good point.
I lived in Seattle for 3.5 years. I can spot those hippy, tree hugging, berkenstock wearing, Starbucks drinking, save the whales advocating, psuedo intellectuals anywhere.
Right... they're usually the ones at the bookstore
not reading monster-truck magazines.
;)
http://taterskins.scout.com/2/490049.html
Article on skins cap
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on January 17, 2006, 02:39:17 PM
Roster Bonuses Restructured - Cap Savings
(assuming 2006 roster bonuses are restructured to become signing bonuses pro-rated for the remaining length of the current contract)
Sean Taylor: $1.8 million
Clinton Portis: $2.5 million
Casey Rabach: $1.5 million
Shawn Springs: $2.5 million
Cornelius Griffin: $2.0 million
Marcus Washington: $1.9 million
Chris Samuels: $3.7 million
Total Cap Savings from Roster Bonus Restructures: $15.9 million
Wasn't Sean Taylor looking for MORE money before the start of this year? Good luck getting him to restructure.
So that article is assuming that they'll be able to restructure SEVEN of their top players' contracts? Jesus. What a farging leap of faith. Idiots.
what they convienantly forget is that the players that they release and trade have to be replaced...you arent just getting rid of their salary
Quote from: rjs246 on January 18, 2006, 09:06:07 AM
So that article is assuming that they'll be able to restructure SEVEN of their top players' contracts? Jesus. What a farging leap of faith. Idiots.
If the restructure only involves converting the roster bonus to a signing bonus, so they still get paid, I could see that. But that doesn't absolve the complete bonus off the 2006 books.
Quote from: FFatPatt on January 17, 2006, 02:46:42 PM
Plus, that's a lot of depth they're losing. Are they counting on some combo of Brunell/Campbell to be the starting QB? Are they really going to let Arrington walk after the beastly game he had against TB in the playoffs?
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 18, 2006, 09:17:36 AM
what they convienantly forget is that the players that they release and trade have to be replaced...you arent just getting rid of their salary
Exactly.
Quotetaterskins | Moss says Wayne addition would be a plus
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:43:56 -0800
David Elfin and Ryan O'Halloran, of the Washington Times, reports Washington taterskins WR Santana Moss said it would be great for the team if they could acquire Indianapolis Colts WR Reggie Wayne, who is scheduled to become an unrestricted free agent. Wayne is considered the prize free agent at the receiver position entering the offseason
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 18, 2006, 10:03:34 AM
Quotetaterskins | Moss says Wayne addition would be a plus
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:43:56 -0800
David Elfin and Ryan O'Halloran, of the Washington Times, reports Washington taterskins WR Santana Moss said it would be great for the team if they could acquire Indianapolis Colts WR Reggie Wayne, who is scheduled to become an unrestricted free agent. Wayne is considered the prize free agent at the receiver position entering the offseason
Yeah, they could pay him in cookies. :-D
It just occurred to me that they were team mates at the U.
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 18, 2006, 10:13:06 AM
It just occurred to me that they were team mates at the U.
I know... it takes a second to remember the "U" connection, considering that Wayne doesn't have a felony under his belt.
I would love to see the taterskins get Wayne, while they let their defense lose depth and talent and continue to hope that their super-coach G-Will can figure something out with the slop they give him to work with.
Should be a good time.
taterskins could get wayne and To and it wouldnt matter without a qb to throw the ball to them
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 18, 2006, 11:36:54 AM
taterskins could get wayne and To and it wouldnt matter without a qb to throw the ball to them
That too. Maybe they're planning to break the shrink-wrap off of Jason Campbell.
Link (http://www.washtimes.com/sports/20060117-115943-8513r.htm)
QuoteEven if Arrington is cut and counts $5 million this year, the taterskins still would be roughly $15 million over the expected $95 million cap.
Relief will have to come from reworking the contracts of players like Pro Bowl offensive tackle Chris Samuels ($10.218 million cap value), offensive tackle Jon Jansen ($5.604 million), cornerback Shawn Springs ($5.558 million), running back Clinton Portis ($5.476 million), quarterback Mark Brunell ($5.433 million), linebacker Marcus Washington ($5.167 million) and guard Randy Thomas ($4.912 million).
The difficulty is that Brunell, who has a base salary of $4 million, and Thomas ($3.5 million) are the only ones with bases of more than $1.5 million. The other five contracts don't have a lot of leeway to turn salaries into bonuses, which can be prorated for up to five years.
The taterskins could save some money by cutting or trading players in the last years of their contracts, such as reserve safety Matt Bowen ($2 million), injured defensive tackle Brandon Noble ($1.7 million), backup quarterback Patrick Ramsey ($1.688 million), third cornerback Walt Harris ($1.5 million) and reserve center Cory Raymer ($985,000). Adding in oft-injured kicker John Hall ($1.5 million), whose contract expires in 2007, would push those savings past $8 million.
Point, laugh, rinse, repeat.
Same story every year. They're close to the cap, and they'll still manage to sign some massive free agent and lose a coreskin or two. A neverending cycle of mediocrity.
They rose above mediocrity this year. Now they're average! :yay
Quote from: General_Failure on January 18, 2006, 04:29:49 PM
They rose above mediocrity this year. Now they're average! :yay
The law of averages will deal them a 5-11 season next year to even things out.
See, you guys just don't get it. The salary cap is inconsequential to the Skins. They're stocking up with 'Gibbs type' players instead. You know, the average Joe's with great character.
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 18, 2006, 04:25:42 PM
Link (http://www.washtimes.com/sports/20060117-115943-8513r.htm)
QuoteEven if Arrington is cut and counts $5 million this year, the taterskins still would be roughly $15 million over the expected $95 million cap.
Relief will have to come from reworking the contracts of players like Pro Bowl offensive tackle Chris Samuels ($10.218 million cap value), offensive tackle Jon Jansen ($5.604 million), cornerback Shawn Springs ($5.558 million), running back Clinton Portis ($5.476 million), quarterback Mark Brunell ($5.433 million), linebacker Marcus Washington ($5.167 million) and guard Randy Thomas ($4.912 million).
The difficulty is that Brunell, who has a base salary of $4 million, and Thomas ($3.5 million) are the only ones with bases of more than $1.5 million. The other five contracts don't have a lot of leeway to turn salaries into bonuses, which can be prorated for up to five years.
The taterskins could save some money by cutting or trading players in the last years of their contracts, such as reserve safety Matt Bowen ($2 million), injured defensive tackle Brandon Noble ($1.7 million), backup quarterback Patrick Ramsey ($1.688 million), third cornerback Walt Harris ($1.5 million) and reserve center Cory Raymer ($985,000). Adding in oft-injured kicker John Hall ($1.5 million), whose contract expires in 2007, would push those savings past $8 million.
Point, laugh, rinse, repeat.
I seriously can't wait for the "2006 Point & Laugh at the taterskins Thread".... :-D
well it is 2006 already
And we're still pointing and laughing at the Skins.
Time to update the thread title then...
never. just keep it going
Done.
Undone. :P
It's time for this thread to die a natural, dignified death. None of this Michael Jordan retirement nonsense. it deserves to go out on top.
i was just doing a google search for DTC to post a picture. look what shows up.
Quote from: phattymatty on January 18, 2006, 05:59:20 PM
i was just doing a google search for DTC to post a picture. look what shows up.
Jesus Christ!!! :puke
fits the criteria for many on this board
Quote from: phattymatty on January 18, 2006, 05:59:20 PM
i was just doing a google search for DTC to post a picture. look what shows up.
(http://zeubeubeu.net/vrac/posts/dtc.jpg)
It doesn't become 2006 until after the superbowl. We are operating on the football calendar, not the inconsequential 'real' calendar.
Last year the 700 level had a thread like this very one: First post is a winnar (http://www.700level.com/fansview/parkinglot/9073/1.aspx)
Quote from: phattymatty on January 18, 2006, 05:59:20 PM
i was just doing a google search for DTC to post a picture. look what shows up.
Dude. Gross.
Quote from: phattymatty on January 18, 2006, 05:59:20 PM
i was just doing a google search for DTC to post a picture. look what shows up.
Crazy ass people in this world... :puke
Quote from: phattymatty on January 18, 2006, 05:59:20 PM
i was just doing a google search for DTC to post a picture. look what shows up.
HA!
(http://twolife.free.fr/vrac/images/dtc.jpg)
Quote from: MDS on January 18, 2006, 06:28:53 PM
Last year the 700 level had a thread like this very one: First post is a winnar (http://www.700level.com/fansview/parkinglot/9073/1.aspx)
I like the way the Mayor tries to take the moral high-ground on that thread on his apparent crusade against internet tough guys when he appears on 700level calling himself "FARGPHILLY". :-D Oh how I wish he'd drop by here.
taterskins Have Options Despite Arrington's Salary
By Jason La Canfora
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, January 19, 2006; E01
The Washington taterskins do not have to renegotiate the contract of LaVar Arrington to meet the NFL salary cap and could get rid of the linebacker while still being able to re-sign their own free agents and add to the roster, according to two experts who have reviewed the team's 2006 payroll.
The taterskins face a $12 million salary cap hit if Arrington is traded or released. He is due a $6.5 million roster bonus by July 15, but that can be converted into a signing bonus prorated over four years to save the team approximately $5 million in cap space in 2006, according to the experts.
But that space is not critical to the taterskins reaching Coach Joe Gibbs's stated goal of keeping the nucleus of the roster together and perhaps adding a key player or two, according to the experts who asked not to be identified because commenting on the taterskins' cap situation could harm their future relationship with the team.
"This isn't a salary cap issue for them," said one of the experts. "They can still get under the cap with that $12 million hit, and not have to really cut anybody they wouldn't want to lose, anyway. This is not a cap issue at all; this is an issue of cash. Does [owner] Dan Snyder really want to give this player a check for $6.5 million? That's what this is all about."
Gibbs was noncommittal about Arrington's future on Monday, but Arrington has been speaking with owner Daniel Snyder recently, team sources said. He is amenable to altering his contract to remain in Washington despite two seasons in which he clashed with the team over treatment of his injuries, his contract and his playing time.
"Right now, I'm a taterskin until I'm told otherwise," he said this week.
The taterskins, like many teams, are over the projected 2006 salary cap of $95 million. Washington has about $113 million committed in players' salaries and bonuses, league sources said, and must be in compliance with the payroll ceiling by March 1.
The two sources said Washington could meet its obligation with or without restructuring Arrington's contract by trading or releasing other players, or reworking other contracts.
By cutting safety Matt Bowen and offensive lineman Cory Raymer, who played sparingly last season; cornerback Walt Harris, who lost his starting job to rookie Carlos Rogers; and place kicker John Hall, who was injured for large parts of the past two seasons, sources said the taterskins could save $6.5 million in 2006 cap space. Defensive tackle Brandon Noble, coming off career-threatening injuries, could retire or, if not, it is unlikely the team would keep him at his $1.7 million base salary. Trading backup quarterback Patrick Ramsey, as expected, would trim another $1.7 million.
Getting quarterback Mark Brunell and tackle Jon Jansen to agree to restructure their $4 million base salaries by converting the money to bonuses that can be spread out over several years against the cap would trim another $5 million. Brunell adjusted his salary last year and Jansen has said he would be open to exploring the idea. Cornerback Shawn Springs, running back Clinton Portis, linebacker Marcus Washington and defensive tackle Cornelius Griffin are among the players who, like Arrington, have large bonuses due in 2006. By restructuring the bonuses, and prorating them, Washington could save about $8 million more under the cap.
All of those moves in total would get the team under $90 million, which would allow them to re-sign key free agent safety Ryan Clark, tight end Robert Royal, running back Rock Cartwright and long snapper Ethan Albright, and leave some room for signing other players. While it might not be enough to land a top-tier free agent such as Indianapolis wide receiver Reggie Wayne, the taterskins would still have other options to create more salary cap space, and, should they keep Arrington at a $7 million cap figure, the opportunity to chase a big-name free agent would increase.
Arrington has a base salary of $545,000. Should the taterskins elect to keep Arrington, there are provisions in his contract that would allow them to alter the deal and prorate the $6.5 million bonus over four years. This would lower his 2006 salary cap amount to $7 million.
Either trading or cutting Arrington would result in him counting $12 million on the team's 2006 cap under the current collective bargaining agreement, although if an extension to the CBA is reached before Arrington's bonus comes due, the taterskins could cut him after June 1 and take a $5 million salary cap hit in 2006 and a $7 million hit in 2007.
No trades become official until March 3, which is also the start of free agency, and two general managers said they believed the taterskins would have difficulty getting more than a mid-round pick for Arrington.
"There's still a market for him," said one AFC general manager who spoke on the condition of anonymity. "But there's also a feeling that they'll eventually end up releasing him, so it's hard to get value for the player."
Good reads.
It'll be interesting to see how they work it. The funny thing is that if they trade Ramsey and end up going with Campbell they'll have one helluva expensive and zesty back up QB.
QuoteGibbs was noncommittal about Arrington's future on Monday, but Arrington has been speaking with owner Daniel Snyder recently, team sources said.
Right here is the problem with the taterskins. When the owner is negotiating behind the GMs back.....
Quotetaterskins | Team meeting with Saunders Thursday
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 05:46:58 -0800
Jerry McDonald, of the Oakland Tribune, reports Kansas City Chiefs offensive coordinator Al Saunders was scheduled to meet with the Washington taterskins Thursday, Jan, 19, for a lucrative position as assistant head coach and offensive coordinator, an NFL source said. Saunders could receive an offer from the deep pockets of Washington owner Daniel Snyder that would exceed what he could make as the Oakland Raiders head coach.
That would be a good move for them. :-X
you think?
imo hed be as worthless as the eagles 'offensive coordinator'
I just wanted Saunders on the Eagles because I didn't want Morhninweg. Not because I actually wanted Saunders.
actually i wonder if snyder wants to groom saunders as his next HC...williams will be gone before gibbs imo but even is he isnt snyder is clearly an offensive guy and would go with saunders over williams imo
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 19, 2006, 08:53:46 AM
Quotetaterskins | Team meeting with Saunders Thursday
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 05:46:58 -0800
Jerry McDonald, of the Oakland Tribune, reports Kansas City Chiefs offensive coordinator Al Saunders was scheduled to meet with the Washington taterskins Thursday, Jan, 19, for a lucrative position as assistant head coach and offensive coordinator, an NFL source said. Saunders could receive an offer from the deep pockets of Washington owner Daniel Snyder that would exceed what he could make as the Oakland Raiders head coach.
That would be a good move for them. :-X
They're talking about Saunders turning down the deal in Oakland because he can get a bigger deal in Washington as OC under Joe Gibbs.
http://www.810whb.com/ You can listen live.
Insert obligatory hate Snyder/taterskins suck comment here.
Damn we spend so much money on coaches its almost cheating :paranoid
:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
The Skins hiring of Saunder looks official: ESPN: Skins Hire Saunders (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2298365)
holy shtein @ that contract
lil danni must be stopped
theyve been mine for years...but now the skins are quickly becoming the countrys new evil empire
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 19, 2006, 01:58:54 PM
holy shtein @ that contract
lil danni must be stopped
theyve been mine for years...but now the skins are quickly becoming the countrys new evil empire
He's making Jerry Jones look like Joe Banner, this is not making me feel well.
Gibbs just officially became the most obvious figurehead in the NFL.
yeah i thought gibbs was an offensive genius
He's got the whole WR screen thing down pat, but the old man needs to learn a new dance move or two.
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 19, 2006, 01:58:54 PM
theyve been mine for years...but now the skins are quickly becoming the countrys new evil empire
now if they could just get the winning part down, they'd be on par with the yankees
I would bet that some of the owenrs of teams in smaller markets, despite the revenue sharing program, will start kicking up a fuss about the amounts that coaches are being paid. Both of the Skins coordinators are making more than some head coaches. It wouldn't affect the Eagles because Lurie will spend on coaches, but teams like Buffalo and Arizona might bitch.
And good point about Gibbs being a figurehead. What exactly is his job now? Williams has autonomy over the defense and now Saunders will likely have the same with the offense.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 19, 2006, 08:37:38 PM
What exactly is his job now?
He's going to get some Art-isfaction.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 19, 2006, 08:37:38 PM
And good point about Gibbs being a figurehead. What exactly is his job now? Williams has autonomy over the defense and now Saunders will likely have the same with the offense.
After the 2004 season he added Bill Musgrave to tinker with the offense and among other things add the shotgun, something Gibbs has always hated.
After the 2005 season he adds Al Saunders, who learned from Coryell in San Diego after Gibbs left.
But keep thinking he's a figure head. It makes Reid that much smarter in comparison when you talk down Hall of Fame Coach Gibbs.
Keep thinking he won't have control of the offense he designed.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 19, 2006, 08:37:38 PM
I would bet that some of the owenrs of teams in smaller markets, despite the revenue sharing program, will start kicking up a fuss about the amounts that coaches are being paid. Both of the Skins coordinators are making more than some head coaches. It wouldn't affect the Eagles because Lurie will spend on coaches, but teams like Buffalo and Arizona might bitch.
How can they? Coaches are part of management. They have no collective bargaining agreement; no revenue sharing.
I can't see all the coaches agreeing to limit the amount of money paid for administration salaries.
great point genius. how could they possibly bitch?
Quote from: phattymatty on January 20, 2006, 10:38:32 AM
great point genius. how could they possibly bitch?
Bitching is one thing. Changing it is another.
ironically saunders isnt even going to be the offensive coordinator
(http://image48.webshots.com/49/4/16/7/372441607GnzbTG_ph.jpg)
(http://img456.imageshack.us/img456/1319/372441607gnzbtgph9hk.jpg)
Hotlinking from webshots works in alternate universes, I've heard.
theres an actual black dude among the dtc. they must envy his every action.
Quote from: MDS on January 20, 2006, 03:21:35 PM
theres an actual black dude among the dtc. they must envy his every action.
Rumor is they hire him for photo shoots.
he aint black...no self respecting brother would be seen with those clowns nor would one root for the skins with them being the last nfl team to integrate as well as them carrying their blatantly racist symbol with pride
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 20, 2006, 11:22:50 AM
ironically saunders isnt even going to be the offensive coordinator
Its just a title.
If they continue to let Gibbs call plays when they have Saunders on the sidelines they are farging idiots. Either Gibbs is going to become a figurehead coach. A leader in an ivory tower, or this is the biggest waste of money I've ever witnessed.
Quote from: rjs246 on January 20, 2006, 03:48:41 PM
If they continue to let Gibbs call plays when they have Saunders on the sidelines they are farging idiots. Either Gibbs is going to become a figurehead coach. A leader in an ivory tower, or this is the biggest waste of money I've ever witnessed.
would either surprise you? especially the second one?
I wouldn't be surprised by either. I'm only surprised by Skins fans thinking that Gibbs' offense is good enough to win consistently with.
Quote from: rjs246 on January 20, 2006, 03:53:22 PM
I wouldn't be surprised by either. I'm only surprised by Skins fans thinking that Gibbs' offense is good enough to win consistently with.
bubble screen magic
either gibbs is not the offensive genius all skins fans make him out to be and if thats the case then its a good move or its a snyder ego trip taking a coach from the bad boy of nfl owners as a way of making a statement
of course skin fans would never dream of calling out gibbs in any way...so the skins fans official company line on this move is that "you can never have enough good coaches"
Quote from: rjs246 on January 20, 2006, 03:48:41 PM
If they continue to let Gibbs call plays when they have Saunders on the sidelines they are farging idiots. Either Gibbs is going to become a figurehead coach. A leader in an ivory tower, or this is the biggest waste of money I've ever witnessed.
Except he didn't call the plays last year either.
Who the hell was calling that disaster of an offense? Christ.
Quote from: rjs246 on January 20, 2006, 04:15:05 PM
Who the hell was calling that disaster of an offense? Christ.
Yes, it was Christ. And he hates the Skins.
Quote from: rjs246 on January 20, 2006, 04:15:05 PM
Who the hell was calling that disaster of an offense? Christ.
Don Breaux and Jack Burns would call the plays from up in the booth, then Gibbs had the final say before the play went out.
Problem was personnel, not playcalling. When Brunell would throw downfield, the offense was among the top in the league. Brunell as the season went on was half of what he was to start the season.
Quote from: qwert246 on January 20, 2006, 04:46:14 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 20, 2006, 04:15:05 PM
Who the hell was calling that disaster of an offense? Christ.
Problem was personnel, not playcalling.
Of course it was. Gibbs is infallable. He's totally up on today's NFL.
Quote from: rjs246 on January 20, 2006, 04:58:38 PM
Quote from: qwert246 on January 20, 2006, 04:46:14 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 20, 2006, 04:15:05 PM
Who the hell was calling that disaster of an offense? Christ.
Problem was personnel, not playcalling.
Of course it was. Gibbs is infallable. He's totally up on today's NFL.
like challenges and the such.
How many times has Steinbrenner picked up a guy in September, just to keep him off the roster of an opponent that may need him?
Ego trip.
QuoteSAUNDERS SQUEEZED 'SKINS WITH PHONY OFFER?
Word around the league is that new taterskins offensive coordinator Al Saunders squeezed some extra coin out of Dan Snyder's deep pockets this week by telling the 'Skins that he was sitting on an offer to become the next coach of the Oakland Raiders.
The only problem is that, you know, the Raiders never actually made him an offer to become their next head coach.
On one hand, it's good negotiating tactics. On the other hand, it's pretty a shaky foundation on which to launch Saunders' career in D.C.
From PFT
Shaky foundation?
Jesus... you gotta be kidding me.
:-D :-D
I wonder if that might, you know, compromise the "trust factor" for the second heir apparent. :-D
QuoteHi Everyone,
Anybody willing to take a week or so off work to attend the Sean Taylor trial, or at least sit outside the courthouse in protest? This is an innocent man and I think the judge/jury needs to see the support he has from a few thousand taterskin fans. The world would probably be a better place if he had shot those punks anyway, they should be thanking him for sparing their lives. The fact that this man is on trial is a travesty.
QuoteDo you know if it will be a jury trial? If so, I have my reservations with the trial being in Florida, Dolphin/Jaguar/Buc fans may be inclined to send him to jail for their own selfish reasons.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 21, 2006, 07:34:40 PM
QuoteHi Everyone,
Anybody willing to take a week or so off work to attend the Sean Taylor trial, or at least sit outside the courthouse in protest? This is an innocent man and I think the judge/jury needs to see the support he has from a few thousand taterskin fans. The world would probably be a better place if he had shot those punks anyway, they should be thanking him for sparing their lives. The fact that this man is on trial is a travesty.
QuoteDo you know if it will be a jury trial? If so, I have my reservations with the trial being in Florida, Dolphin/Jaguar/Buc fans may be inclined to send him to jail for their own selfish reasons.
No freaking way. Is this Art? This is idiocy even for him.
Wow, thats just disgusting. On so many levels.
No, not Arthur. Some random douche who probably adopted the single spit theory in Tampa.
"That loogie was going back...and to the left. Back...and to the left. It did not hit Governor Pittman after going through President Taylor's facemask"
<---------- Speechless. :o
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 21, 2006, 07:34:40 PM
QuoteHi Everyone,
Anybody willing to take a week or so off work to attend the Sean Taylor trial, or at least sit outside the courthouse in protest? This is an innocent man and I think the judge/jury needs to see the support he has from a few thousand taterskin fans. The world would probably be a better place if he had shot those punks anyway, they should be thanking him for sparing their lives. The fact that this man is on trial is a travesty.
QuoteDo you know if it will be a jury trial? If so, I have my reservations with the trial being in Florida, Dolphin/Jaguar/Buc fans may be inclined to send him to jail for their own selfish reasons.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 21, 2006, 07:34:40 PM
QuoteHi Everyone,
Anybody willing to take a week or so off work to attend the Sean Taylor trial, or at least sit outside the courthouse in protest? This is an innocent man and I think the judge/jury needs to see the support he has from a few thousand taterskin fans. The world would probably be a better place if he had shot those punks anyway, they should be thanking him for sparing their lives. The fact that this man is on trial is a travesty.
QuoteDo you know if it will be a jury trial? If so, I have my reservations with the trial being in Florida, Dolphin/Jaguar/Buc fans may be inclined to send him to jail for their own selfish reasons.
youve got to be kidding me
At what point are you all going to stop being surprised by this shtein?
I'll admit... I wasn't ready for that shtein at all. I mean, we know these guys are retarded beyond belief, but.... DAMN!
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 21, 2006, 07:41:45 PM
No, not Arthur. Some random douche who probably adopted the single spit theory in Tampa.
Bubba the spermicidal contraceptive sponge?
Mort says:
Saunders will be the OC and playcaller. Gibbs will focus on being the GM and more involved in personnel stuff.
i.e. a figurehead
President of Idol Worship.
From a thread titled "are the refs boycotting joe?"
Quotei know the officiating was pretty horrid this year league wide. but i couldn't help but notice they are extra harsh on joe gibbs and mike shannahan. both coaches were the 2 most outspoken about the refs this year, and they seemed to be targeted for it. is there anything the league can do to penalize crews who obviously take comments personally and show biased officiating, or is the NFL really that wrapped up in itself that they think their crews can do no wrong? i think there should be a department in the league that spends the offseason breaking down bad calls, and fining or suspending repeat offenders that seem to have it out for certain teams. maybe they'd call the games a little more fair if that was the case. but we know the NFL, they're never wrong, just ask mike alstott.
i want to drop a bomb on dc
The greatest moment in taterskins history (http://www.taterskins.com/uploads/messageboards/History/16.mpg)
Brought to you in classic 80's news report.
QuoteI had the opportunity a few nights ago to chat with Mark Eckel for about 10 minutes. For those of you who don't know Eckel, he is the Eagles beat writer for the Trenton Times, and is regarded as the number 1 beat guy on the Eagles. I like reading him because he seems to be the most "Real" writer and doesn't kiss the butts of Lurie and Reid. Anyway .. I was working a local college basketball game and Eckel was writing for it. Before the game, I introduced myself as a Skins season ticket holder. We talked EXCLUSIVELY about the taterskins.
I'll briefly state my questions and his response. (He does know the NFL)
Of course, this was NOT an interview, just us chatting. Everything here is paraphrased.
What do you think of the hiring of Saunders? Never was a Snyder hater, since there is no "coaches salary cap", understands why JG and Snyder did this. Thinks it will help the offense BIG TIME.
Will Lavar be here next year? He says he wants to retire a taterskin. Thinks Danny and Lavar will work it out.
Biggest problem with the taterskins this past season? Didn't have a number 2 WR. Need someone to take the pressure off Moss.
If you could do 1 thing to make the Skins better, what would it be? (I asked if Brunell was the problem) Not a big Brunell fan, but thinks he'll be OK. MUST GET #2.
What about Patten? Isn't he a decent #2? NOOOOO, he's "OK" as a #3, but not a #2. SKINS WILL DRAFT THEIR NUMBER 2.
Will TO be a taterskin? Absolutely not, TO will be a Dolphin, bank on it.
Alright, enough of this. Just wanted to share my little chat with Eckel with you guys. Although he is an Eagles beat writer, he loves talking football and is pretty good at keeping it real.
HTTR
Kevin Johnson would be the perfect #2 for Santana Moss.
I was waiting for him to slip KJ into that response. I was disappointed. You know he was thinking it though.
He went home and thought it into a couple of tissues.
Quote from: General_Failure on January 22, 2006, 11:15:18 PM
Kevin Johnson would be the perfect #2 for Santana Moss.
:-D first thing I thought before clicking on the 108th page of this thread.
While wearing nothing but a Johnson Lions jersey. He rotates the Syracuse/Browns/Ravens/Lions ones.
The custom #85 Johnson Eagles one is still in the plastic. Waiting for the honeymoon night.
He lost me at #1 beat guy for the Eagles
When Art says beat, what he means is ...
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 22, 2006, 11:18:27 PM
I was waiting for him to slip KJ into that response. I was disappointed. You know he was thinking it though.
No way. Let KJ go to the rival taterskins? Ha. He was merely throwing up a smoke screen in the hopes that the Skins wouldn't steal him away from Philly.
from peety king...
DENVER -- For all the fans of the NFL's other 28 teams, those teams trying to get to where Pittsburgh and Seattle are going, and where Denver and Carolina tried to go this weekend, here are my shirtpocket notes from the last few, very eventful days:
1. Who do I think is off to the best start for 2006?
Clue: The owner rubs you the wrong way.
Another clue: When I finished interviewing the coach of this team last weekend, he shook my hand, wished me well and handed me a Bible tract.
Another clue: The team has a safety, a really good one, with a phlegm problem.
You've got it. The Washington taterskins. By signing ex-Chiefs offensive coordinator Al Saunders, the choreographer of the league's highest-scoring offense over the last four years, owner Dan Snyder now has spent approximately $4.6 million on Saunders and defensive game-planner/play-caller Gregg Williams -- in 2006 salary alone. An outrageous sum? Not for a man whose team will rake in something like $325 million in 2006. Would you pay a small percent of your gross revenue for the men you believe are the best offensive and defensive play-callers in football? If you wouldn't, you're not trying to win at any cost. For all the times I've killed Snyder over the years for his wasteful spending and jock-sniffing trophy collecting (most notably with the signing of way-past-his-prime Deion Sanders), this, as I said after the Williams signing a couple of weeks ago, is just smart business.
Now the one thing I'd throw in here as a caution -- and it's something Mike Shanahan echoed to me over the weekend -- is that there's an awful lot of bosses right now on Washington's offense. Joe Bugel used to be a head coach. Joe Gibbs has called plays forever. Quarterback coach Bill Musgrave has taught the quarterbacks his way. Now with Saunders coming in the door, how will the day-to-day coaching work?
These guys will say all the right things about all-for-one and one-for-all, but I'm big on the chemistry thing among coaches in locker rooms. How will Bugel react to Saunders telling him he's going to do things a little differently than Bugel's been coaching for 100 years? How will Gibbs react to Saunders saying, "Coach, I know you like Jason Campbell as your quarterback of the future, but for my offense, Patrick Ramsey is 10 times better?"
The point is, there's going to have to be a whole lot of ego-checking. I think it can be handled -- I can't tell you how impressed I am with the reincarnation of Gibbs and his readjustment to NFL life -- but it is something to be monitored.
Dick Vermeil left every facet of the offense to Saunders, and Saunders was so controlling that he never would call the same play over a four-game span. His theory was that if teams studied the Chiefs, he didn't want them ever to see anything predictable in the four previous games Kansas City played. "I think that's taking it a bit too far,'' Vermeil told me last year, "but you can't argue with Al's success. It works. He's done a fantastic job. And the fact is, teams do have trouble adjusting to what we do.''
Wait a second... Saunders never called the same play over four games?
Okay, say a team has 65 offensive plays per game. That means the Chiefs would run 250 or so different plays and never run the same play twice during a four game span?
Is it just me or does that sound implausible?
Depends on how much difference there is to a "play". Is off-tackle right different from off-tackle left?
Speaking of writers with irrational man-crushes who beat off to scrub players... at least ol' Petey got to see a half decent season out of his perennial league MVP.
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 19, 2006, 08:37:38 PM
I would bet that some of the owenrs of teams in smaller markets, despite the revenue sharing program, will start kicking up a fuss about the amounts that coaches are being paid. Both of the Skins coordinators are making more than some head coaches. It wouldn't affect the Eagles because Lurie will spend on coaches, but teams like Buffalo and Arizona might bitch.
WashTimes; Tags concerned about coaching staff deals (http://www.washtimes.com/sports/20060123-010349-4177r.htm)
QuoteNFL commissioner Paul Tagliabue said yesterday he is concerned about the large amount of money the Washington taterskins have spent on their coaching staff.
The taterskins gave assistant head coach-defense Gregg Williams a three-year contract extension worth about $8 million early this month. The team hired Al Saunders from the Kansas City Chiefs to fill a similar post on offense last week. Saunders, who will be introduced today at taterskin Park, agreed to a three-year contract worth about $6 million.
Williams and Saunders each will make more than many NFL head coaches.
Tagliabue, speaking to reporters before the AFC Championship game, said such salaries for assistant coaches are an issue in the context of the ongoing league battle between high-revenue and low-revenue teams.
Some owners say clubs like the taterskins have a competitive advantage because they generate high revenue from sources like local broadcast rights, stadium signage and skyboxes that are not pooled and divided among all the league's teams.
Owners of low-revenue teams have been pushing for more of that money to be pooled. The owners will resume discussion of the issue Thursday in Orlando, Fla. However, Tagliabue said he isn't optimistic they can bridge their differences by March 3, when the free agent signing period begins.
I heart pointing and laughing at the skins.
Coaches cap. The NFL is out to get the taterskins.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2308407
We havne't heard from the douchecrew in a while. I wonder where they went?
Maybe you slept through this. (http://www.superbowl.com/gamecenter/live/NFL_20060114_WAS@SEA)
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 27, 2006, 01:29:42 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2308407
That's a 'Gibbs type player' if I ever saw one....
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 27, 2006, 01:50:05 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 27, 2006, 01:29:42 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2308407
That's a 'Gibbs type player' if I ever saw one....
We all know he'll skate and won't miss a game.
or hell serve a month in county...a month that will surely not interfere with any football related activities
Quote from: FFatPatt on January 27, 2006, 02:39:59 PM
We all know he'll skate and won't miss a game.
Sad but true.
It's a traveshamockery that this young man has been targeted by the footballuminatti in their quest to keep the taterskins down.
They don't have much on taylor. They are splitting the charges in hopes that one of the people taylor assulted looks legitimate enough that he alone would get a guilty charge against taylor. They offered Taylor's friend who ran around with a baseball bat hitting people a plea bargin that he would get off completely if he was to testify against taylor. This guy Caughman is looking at up to 15 years so why would they offer him a get out of jail free card unless they had no evidence.
I can't wait till he is rotting in prison. How soon 'till some from ES gets sent to the same prison they can break him out and/or become his bitch.
art will definitely keep his commissary caked off...so thats one less thing hell have to worry about when locked up
:-D
"Dear Mr. Taylor...here's $40 for you from me. I hope you enjoy your licorice sticks, bomb pops and strawberry soda pop".
Love,
Art.
If he's convicted Skins fans will bitch and moan about the law the same way they do about the refs. "They're out to get us, it's a conspiracy"
After watching the last season of FOX they'll come up with a plan to have someone arrested and put into prison with him so they can get Taylor out.
Quote from: General_Failure on January 28, 2006, 07:10:25 PM
After watching the last season of FOX they'll come up with a plan to have someone arrested and put into prison with him so they can get Taylor out.
Or at least keep him some "company."
Quote
Monday, January 30, 2006
Gray added to all-star staff as secondary coach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Len Pasquarelli
ESPN.com
The Washington taterskins have continued their assemblage of an all-star, and pricey staff of assistants, hiring Jerry Gray to coach the secondary.
Most recently the defensive coordinator of the Buffalo Bills, a position that he held for five seasons (2001-05), Gray becomes the latest high profile aide in owner Dan Snyder's galaxy of staffers.
The taterskins recently hired former Kansas City offensive coordinator Al Saunders in the same capacity, signing him to a three-year contract worth about $6 million. Before that, the taterskins took highly regarded defensive coordinator Gregg Williams out of the head coach market by signing him to a three-year extension that could be worth as much as $2.6 million annually, and which will pay him a $1 million bonus if he is not named head coach when Joe Gibbs retires.
Contract details of Gray's deal were not available.
Hiring Gray reunites him with Williams and Washington will be the third different team with which the two have worked together. Gray was the Tennessee secondary coach when Williams was the Titans' defensive coordinator. When Williams went to Buffalo as head coach in 2001, he brought Gray along.
Gray, 43, interviewed earlier this month for the head coach vacancy with the Houston Texans and also met with several teams regarding defensive coordinator positions. It was fairly well known that, if Gray did not land any of those positions, he probably would join the taterskins' staff.
A former NFL defensive back, Gray played nine seasons with the Los Angeles Rams (1985-91), Houston Oilers (1992) and Tampa Bay Bucs (1993). He began his coaching career at SMU in 1995 and served two seasons on the staff there before being hired by the Titans in 1997.
Dan Snyder is a farging moron. Not only is he pissing off just about every small market team, but he is hiring every coach who will be on a list of possible HC canidates in the coming years. A lot of high profile coaches to just go ahead and suck.
I'm not complaining ;D
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on January 30, 2006, 10:27:49 AM
I'm not complaining ;D
You will be when the results aren't as hoped.
Quote from: FFatPatt on January 30, 2006, 10:30:17 AM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on January 30, 2006, 10:27:49 AM
I'm not complaining ;D
You will be when the results aren't as hoped.
he is replacing our DBs coach who left. I am not hoping for him to make all of our DBs pro bowlers. If you are talking about Saunders then MAYBE your right.
I'm talking about all the coaching acquisitions.
Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC on January 30, 2006, 10:24:39 AM
Dan Snyder is a farging moron. Not only is he pissing off just about every small market team, but he is hiring every coach who will be on a list of possible HC canidates in the coming years. A lot of high profile coaches to just go ahead and suck.
Nice spin move, O'reilly.
Only you people can take Gray's hiring as a negative.
He's worked with Williams in Buffalo.
He's an upgrade over a coach that is leaving to coach UCLA.
But the owner is a "problem" beacuse he's trying to hire good coaches.
We'll see. You have four potential head coaches on that staff - is everyone going to get along great? Not likely.
Too many hands in the pot.
Too many chefs in the kitchen.
Too many meatcicles and no bitch.
Danny Boy could hire Jesus Christ to coach special teams and the simple fact remains, as long as he owns the team, they will continue to be average and never win anything.
Quote from: EagleFeva on January 30, 2006, 11:27:48 AM
Too many meatcicles and no bitch.
What do you think Gibbs is?
money and blood dont mix like two dicks and no bitch...do it and find yourself in serious ish
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 30, 2006, 11:45:49 AM
money and blood dont mix like two dicks and no bitch...do it and find yourself in serious ish
Knew you'd catch that.
Quote from: Sun_Mo on January 30, 2006, 11:30:20 AM
Danny Boy could hire Jesus Christ to coach special teams and the simple fact remains, as long as he owns the team, they will continue to be average and never win anything.
Maybe you are correct but guess what??? When have the fecals won anything...1960??
I wouldnt call them average...they played the second hardest schedule and were one qb from the championship game. If I was a fan of the eagles I would be praying Saunders falls on his face because if he replicates what williams did with the d they will win something.
Snyder gets bashed if he spends...he would get bashed if he did nothing. Dan is just easy to hate.
Quote from: skin48 on January 30, 2006, 12:29:53 PM
Snyder gets bashed if he spends...he would get bashed if he did nothing. Dan is just easy to hate.
he is easy to hate, and it has nothing to do with his spending. it has everything to do with him being an impatient, obnoxious, self-important, know-nothing scum bucket
Quote from: Sun_Mo on January 30, 2006, 12:32:16 PM
he is easy to hate, and it has nothing to do with his spending. it has everything to do with him being an impatient, obnoxious, self-important, know-nothing scum bucket
I will agree with you on most of that, but personally I don't give a shtein whether I like the owner or not.
He's an ass, but if he is willing to spend money on coaches and that makes the team more competitive, well you passed owner 101.
Seriously, do you really care if you like Lurie or not?
Quote from: qwert246 on January 30, 2006, 01:13:29 PM
Quote from: Sun_Mo on January 30, 2006, 12:32:16 PM
he is easy to hate, and it has nothing to do with his spending. it has everything to do with him being an impatient, obnoxious, self-important, know-nothing scum bucket
I will agree with you on most of that, but personally I don't give a shtein whether I like the owner or not.
He's an ass, but if he is willing to spend money on coaches and that makes the team more competitive, well you passed owner 101.
Seriously, do you really care if you like Lurie or not?
no, i don't care at all. nor should anybody. it just felt good to say that.
Quote from: FFatPatt on January 30, 2006, 10:30:17 AM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on January 30, 2006, 10:27:49 AM
I'm not complaining ;D
You will be when the results aren't as hoped.
That's just the thing... no he won't. He'll blame everyone but the person who's responsible for the impending fiasco in Washington.
Do you really think the NFL is going to sit by and allow this shtein to happen?
Snyder is a clueless little dicksucker.
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on January 30, 2006, 01:26:26 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on January 30, 2006, 10:30:17 AM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on January 30, 2006, 10:27:49 AM
I'm not complaining ;D
You will be when the results aren't as hoped.
That's just the thing... no he won't. He'll blame everyone but the person who's responsible for the impending fiasco in Washington.
Do you really think the NFL is going to sit by and allow this shtein to happen?
Snyder is a clueless little dicksucker.
Allow what?? He is not breaking any rules. What can the NFL do...iniate a salary cap for coaches. That salary cap has REALLY discouraged Snyder from spending on free agents hasnt it? There is one major difference between the teams under Gibbs and the previous regimes during Snyders ownership. The taterskins are becoming a team built around team chemistry and stability is a major reason for this. The NFL is a coaches league...The pats have proven you dont win with all stars you win with a team and chemistry and stability are two elements Washington hasnt had since he left in 92.
Gibbs is the one to blame not Danny boy. Snyder just signs the checks, fellas!
Synder has a reputation for being meddling for things that happened in the past.
Deion Sanders and Bruce Smith helped Snyder make money, but didn't make the team more competitive, and it always seemed like Snyder was somehow influencing those moves.
But the team hasn't signed a Jeff George in a while, so it possible he's learned from his mistakes. At least it seems that way. People can knock him, but he definitely wants to put a winning product on the field.
As an owner, just sign the checks, and listen to your coaches. I don't give a shtein what else you do.
As an analogy, lets go back 10 years.
Merck Sharp and Dohme spends 100s of millions to buy a major insurance company. That was fine, until they then said only Merck drugs would be covered under this insurance company's policies.
Feds came in and slapped that shtein, hard, and forced Merck to divest the insurance company, at an enormous loss.
We'll be seeing a coaching cap in the very near future.
Quote from: MadMarchHare on January 30, 2006, 03:30:55 PM
As an analogy, lets go back 10 years.
Merck Sharp and Dohme spends 100s of millions to buy a major insurance company. That was fine, until they then said only Merck drugs would be covered under this insurance company's policies.
Feds came in and slapped that shtein, hard, and forced Merck to divest the insurance company, at an enormous loss.
We'll be seeing a coaching cap in the very near future.
Myabe a coaching cap will happen eventually, but the analogy is flawed.
That was the Fed Govt policing a service related industry.
This cap would only happen when all the owners agree to it, not some outside regulatory body. They have a hard enough time agreeing on things as it is.
coaches lose games players win them....unless youre truly one of the greats...and none of the coaches currently on the skins staff are that...gibbs was but clearly he even knows hes finished
moral of the story is until the skins get a good qb...which isnt anytime soon...they arent going anywhere near the superbowl without a ticket
Quote from: qwert246 on January 30, 2006, 04:10:28 PM
Quote from: MadMarchHare on January 30, 2006, 03:30:55 PM
As an analogy, lets go back 10 years.
Merck Sharp and Dohme spends 100s of millions to buy a major insurance company. That was fine, until they then said only Merck drugs would be covered under this insurance company's policies.
Feds came in and slapped that shtein, hard, and forced Merck to divest the insurance company, at an enormous loss.
We'll be seeing a coaching cap in the very near future.
Myabe a coaching cap will happen eventually, but the analogy is flawed.
That was the Fed Govt policing a service related industry.
This cap would only happen when all the owners agree to it, not some outside regulatory body. They have a hard enough time agreeing on things as it is.
I don't think that's correct. I think they'd only need 2/3 to get it approved, and there are a helluva lot of small market owners out there who'd like a shot at some of them coaches on the Skins sideline.
Flat out, Danny is using the existing rules to his advantage. Good for him. But it won't last forever.
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 30, 2006, 04:15:35 PM
coaches lose games players win them....unless youre truly one of the greats...and none of the coaches currently on the skins staff are that...gibbs was but clearly he even knows hes finished
moral of the story is until the skins get a good qb..which isnt anytime soon...they arent going anywhere near the superbowl without a ticket
Even if what you say is right, that's where Campbell is supposed to come in.
Campbell. I love it.
the savoir has gone from gibbs to campbell...or wait...is it saunders??
im so confused
Quote from: qwert246 on January 30, 2006, 02:14:19 PM
Synder has a reputation for being meddling for things that happened in the past.
Deion Sanders and Bruce Smith helped Snyder make money, but didn't make the team more competitive, and it always seemed like Snyder was somehow influencing those moves.
But the team hasn't signed a Jeff George in a while, so it possible he's learned from his mistakes. At least it seems that way. People can knock him, but he definitely wants to put a winning product on the field. :-D
As an owner, just sign the checks, and listen to your coaches. I don't give a shtein what else you do.
You morons always buy into Snyder's shtein. Snyder is great at making Skins fans think that because of what he does in the offseason, this will be the year for the Skins. All the big name free agents got you what? Nada. Bringing back Joe "The Saint" Gibbs? A 6-10 season followed by a sneak-in to the playoffs in the horrible NFC- how will ol'Joe fair with an aging QB, no pass rush, a small, unproductive receiving corps, and zero depth in the secondary and the lines, in an improved, healthy NFC East? Hiring a lot of head coaches to make the big push? It'll still get you nada. It will however keep you buying the shtein from the Official taterskins stores in the malls, listening to his bought "Sports Talk" radio stations, paying for the over-priced parking, the ultra-expensive tickets, and nursing his sky-high priced beer in his dump of a stadium. Have a nice farging offseason waiting to be ass-raped watching and/or following your over-hyped, underachieving, joke of a football team. You farging lemmings.
tell us how you really feel :-)
Nothing can inspire that kind of ire outside of being an Eagles fan forced to live in the DC area. Nothing.
^^^^
real talk
that brought a tear to my eye
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 30, 2006, 04:15:35 PM
coaches lose games players win them....unless youre truly one of the greats...and none of the coaches currently on the skins staff are that...gibbs was but clearly he even knows hes finished
moral of the story is until the skins get a good qb...which isnt anytime soon...they arent going anywhere near the superbowl without a ticket
Why is Gibbs not one of the greats?? Has he not turned around a franchise that couldnt do anything right and taken them to the playoffs and won a playoff game in only two seasons. I would bet Gibbs is not finished, in fact, he is just getting started. I would venture to say find a coach with ten years+ experience that has achieved a winning % better than Joe Gibbs. Shula and Lombardi may be the only coaches that surpass Gibbs winning %. And both of those guys had dominant teams in eras when the competiton was not as strong as it was when gibbs forged his record.
Your qb comment is unfounded, Gibbs won 3 sb's with average qbs.
QuoteYour qb comment is unfounded, Gibbs won 3 sb's with average qbs.
In an era where the owner could spend as much money as he wanted to keep the rest of the team together. You give any team the same offensive line for a decade and they'll be able to run an offense with subpar talent. This ain't 1988, dude.
Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC on January 30, 2006, 04:52:46 PM
Quote from: qwert246 on January 30, 2006, 02:14:19 PM
Synder has a reputation for being meddling for things that happened in the past.
Deion Sanders and Bruce Smith helped Snyder make money, but didn't make the team more competitive, and it always seemed like Snyder was somehow influencing those moves.
But the team hasn't signed a Jeff George in a while, so it possible he's learned from his mistakes. At least it seems that way. People can knock him, but he definitely wants to put a winning product on the field. :-D
As an owner, just sign the checks, and listen to your coaches. I don't give a shtein what else you do.
You morons always buy into Snyder's shtein. Snyder is great at making Skins fans think that because of what he does in the offseason, this will be the year for the Skins. All the big name free agents got you what? Nada. Bringing back Joe "The Saint" Gibbs? A 6-10 season followed by a sneak-in to the playoffs in the horrible NFC- how will ol'Joe fair with an aging QB, no pass rush, a small, unproductive receiving corps, and zero depth in the secondary and the lines, in an improved, healthy NFC East? Hiring a lot of head coaches to make the big push? It'll still get you nada. It will however keep you buying the shtein from the Official taterskins stores in the malls, listening to his bought "Sports Talk" radio stations, paying for the over-priced parking, the ultra-expensive tickets, and nursing his sky-high priced beer in his dump of a stadium. Have a nice farging offseason waiting to be ass-raped watching and/or following your over-hyped, underachieving, joke of a football team. You farging lemmings.
Tampon wet?
Comment on Joe "Saint" Gibbs. Check
Comment on Stupid Snyder. Check
Comment on lousy players. Check
Comment on the future being bleak for stupid skins fans, with prediction of lousy record. Check
You hit the superfecta.
Quote from: qwert246 on January 30, 2006, 04:28:16 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 30, 2006, 04:15:35 PM
coaches lose games players win them....unless youre truly one of the greats...and none of the coaches currently on the skins staff are that...gibbs was but clearly he even knows hes finished
moral of the story is until the skins get a good qb..which isnt anytime soon...they arent going anywhere near the superbowl without a ticket
Even if what you say is right, that's where Campbell is supposed to come in.
And that right there is what makes Skins fans so farging hilarious! :-D
You actually believe that shtein, don't you?
Quote from: EagleFeva on January 30, 2006, 05:27:24 PM
Quote from: qwert246 on January 30, 2006, 04:28:16 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 30, 2006, 04:15:35 PM
coaches lose games players win them....unless youre truly one of the greats...and none of the coaches currently on the skins staff are that...gibbs was but clearly he even knows hes finished
moral of the story is until the skins get a good qb..which isnt anytime soon...they arent going anywhere near the superbowl without a ticket
Even if what you say is right, that's where Campbell is supposed to come in.
And that right there is what makes Skins fans so farging hilarious! :-D
You actually believe that shtein, don't you?
Believe that Campbell could lead the team? Of course.
The hypocrisy on this board is thick. When McMahon comes in it's "he can scramble like McNabb and create. He's gonna be a great fit." When someone suggests the skins #25 overall pick from last year, who some people rated higher than Rogers, who had a stellar college career under multiple tutors, could lead the team in the future, it's met with smilies, etc.
When he starts and looks good leading the team, I'll be sure to dig up this post.
Who on this board believed that McMahon would be anything like McNabb? :sly
Quote from: skin48 on January 30, 2006, 05:08:27 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 30, 2006, 04:15:35 PM
coaches lose games players win them....unless youre truly one of the greats...and none of the coaches currently on the skins staff are that...gibbs was but clearly he even knows hes finished
moral of the story is until the skins get a good qb...which isnt anytime soon...they arent going anywhere near the superbowl without a ticket
Why is Gibbs not one of the greats?? Has he not turned around a franchise that couldnt do anything right and taken them to the playoffs and won a playoff game in only two seasons. I would bet Gibbs is not finished, in fact, he is just getting started. I would venture to say find a coach with ten years+ experience that has achieved a winning % better than Joe Gibbs. Shula and Lombardi may be the only coaches that surpass Gibbs winning %. And both of those guys had dominant teams in eras when the competiton was not as strong as it was when gibbs forged his record.
Your qb comment is unfounded, Gibbs won 3 sb's with average qbs.
:-D
How can anyone take shtein like this seriously?
I mean, it used to be fun to read things like this because I genuinely thought they were just trolling. Then you come to realize that they aren't trolling at all. They're serious. They buy into the whole "Gibbs is God" fairy tale.
Just unreal. :-D :-D
Quote from: qwert246 on January 30, 2006, 09:25:41 PM
The hypocrisy on this board is thick. When McMahon comes in it's "he can scramble like McNabb and create. He's gonna be a great fit."
Where did you see that at? :-D
And putting your faith in Campbell puts a huge smile on my face. ;D
Jason Campbell < Mark Rypien's sweaty jock strap.
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on January 30, 2006, 09:42:10 PM
Quote from: skin48 on January 30, 2006, 05:08:27 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 30, 2006, 04:15:35 PM
coaches lose games players win them....unless youre truly one of the greats...and none of the coaches currently on the skins staff are that...gibbs was but clearly he even knows hes finished
moral of the story is until the skins get a good qb...which isnt anytime soon...they arent going anywhere near the superbowl without a ticket
Why is Gibbs not one of the greats?? Has he not turned around a franchise that couldnt do anything right and taken them to the playoffs and won a playoff game in only two seasons. I would bet Gibbs is not finished, in fact, he is just getting started. I would venture to say find a coach with ten years+ experience that has achieved a winning % better than Joe Gibbs. Shula and Lombardi may be the only coaches that surpass Gibbs winning %. And both of those guys had dominant teams in eras when the competiton was not as strong as it was when gibbs forged his record.
Your qb comment is unfounded, Gibbs won 3 sb's with average qbs.
:-D
How can anyone take shtein like this seriously?
I mean, it used to be fun to read things like this because I genuinely thought they were just trolling. Then you come to realize that they aren't trolling at all. They're serious. They buy into the whole "Gibbs is God" fairy tale.
Just unreal. :-D :-D
Be a critic of Gibbs when youre team wins a trophy. I never said Gibbs is god but he is a great football coach...his record speaks for itself. 14 years of coaching and only two losing seasons.
Three if you count next year.
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 30, 2006, 10:26:49 PM
Quote from: qwert246 on January 30, 2006, 09:25:41 PM
The hypocrisy on this board is thick. When McMahon comes in it's "he can scramble like McNabb and create. He's gonna be a great fit."
Where did you see that at? :-D
I might have just been thinking of stupid Cataldi, but...
Quote from: rjs246 on March 10, 2005, 11:34:56 AM
A young mobile QB? Fine.
Quote from: Zanshin on March 10, 2005, 12:09:04 PM
I think that would be a nice signing. He's young, mobile and knows the system.
Quote from: WEST is GOD on November 01, 2005, 04:05:52 PM
McMahon is way better than Koy. Better arm, more accurate, better scrambler, taller so he sees the field better.
Quote from: Larry on November 01, 2005, 10:20:34 AM
If Feeley could make due with Pinkston, Thrash, and Duce, then McMahon should be able to do something with TO, Westbrook, and LJ.
Quote from: WEST is GOD on November 01, 2005, 04:49:44 PM
Yea, because Koy and McMahon have both taken so many regular season snaps on this team for me to judge under equal personnel. ::)
McMahon does everything better than Koy, except keeping cool. The one thing about McMahon is he can get out of control and scramble around instead of hitting an open receiver. He has more of an ability to make plays than Koy, has a way stronger arm, and is more accurate on passes 5 yards or longer. Koy isn't even accurate unless he throws a 5 yard post(its only 5 yards because of Koy's arm) or a screen pass.
Quote from: WEST is GOD on October 31, 2005, 06:36:19 PM
Those people were idiots from the get go. The get surgery crowd has drifted off though. The new crowd is the "Start McMahon" crowd. At this point I'm not in that boat yet, because it's unknown how much the injury is affecting McNabb and how much of it is teams blitzing. If they fix the protection and start to run the ball and McNabb is still this bad then I'll want McMahon in there. He's better than AJ Feeley and AJ Feeley came here and won games.
FARG THE SKINS
So all your searching came up with one person accepting the signing, one person thinking he's better than Koy, one person thinking he would be able to do something with TO, LJ, and Westbrook out there, and one guy that ... I'm gonna say got banned for being completely retarded. I don't really remember, all I know is he ain't here no more.
Quote from: General_Failure on January 31, 2006, 12:27:25 AM
So all your searching came up with one person accepting the signing, one person thinking he's better than Koy, one person thinking he would be able to do something with TO, LJ, and Westbrook out there, and one guy that ... I'm gonna say got banned for being completely retarded. I don't really remember, all I know is he ain't here no more.
Yea, I realized I quoted him three times. "all my searching"...
Quote from: qwert246 on January 31, 2006, 12:56:57 AM
Quote from: General_Failure on January 31, 2006, 12:27:25 AM
So all your searching came up with one person accepting the signing, one person thinking he's better than Koy, one person thinking he would be able to do something with TO, LJ, and Westbrook out there, and one guy that ... I'm gonna say got banned for being completely retarded. I don't really remember, all I know is he ain't here no more.
Yea, I realized I quoted him three times. "all my searching"...
isn't that they way skins fans are classified? By a small group of idiots on one specific board?
You don't sent to the rules around here. MURP does. I only listen to him. You can't tell me what to do.
I told you this thread should have been locked at its peak. Currently it sucks monkey nut.
It's on life support until March. That's when the FA period starts and we all fill our lungs up with air and laugh in the 2006 version for a whole 'nother year. We'll get to point & laugh at them overpaying for some washed up scrub (ex. Mark Brunell) and collecting 38 more h-backs.
My favorite time of year.
cant laugh to much...the skins were much better than the eagles last year and as of now are just as good going into this if not a little better
Stop it with your rational responses. Just point. And laugh.
ooops...i slipped....my bad
This is far too long to go without laughing.
The skins might get TO.. ha ha.
The idea of consolidating my hate like that is pretty outstanding.