ConcreteBoard

Eagles => Eagles Talk => Topic started by: 4and26 on December 28, 2008, 08:38:12 PM

Title: Minnesota Talk
Post by: 4and26 on December 28, 2008, 08:38:12 PM
Fox 4:30pm EST Sunday

No Line Set 
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: BigEd76 on December 28, 2008, 08:39:44 PM
Eagles are a 3-point favorite, O/U 42
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Butchers Bill on December 28, 2008, 09:11:06 PM
Stop Peterson = win game.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: MDS on December 28, 2008, 09:58:17 PM
wow
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: The BIGSTUD on December 28, 2008, 10:04:58 PM
Yep, stop AP means you win. Their QB situation is brutal and they have no WRs or TEs that scare you.

and no Visanthe doesn't scare me.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: shorebird on December 28, 2008, 10:26:25 PM
I'm still taking it in that the Eagles are even playing next week, much less who they are playing.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: 4and26 on December 28, 2008, 10:43:21 PM
Quote from: shorebird on December 28, 2008, 10:26:25 PM
I'm still taking it in that the Eagles are even playing next week, much less who they are playing.

Could not agree more.....no one shaves this week!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: MDS on December 29, 2008, 12:08:44 AM
anyone know any good sports bars in montreal? im going up a little after new years with some people. all the frogs aside it should be fun, even though im not sure how to have fun without rjs by my side.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Butchers Bill on December 29, 2008, 03:19:49 AM
Anyone wanna go?  Ticketmaster has tickets available.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Father Demon on December 29, 2008, 10:25:16 AM
I actually thought about going.  Then I remembered I had to be in SC for my first day on the job the next day.  Missing that probably isn't the first impression I want to make.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Feva on December 29, 2008, 10:31:04 AM
Quote from: Father Demon on December 29, 2008, 10:25:16 AM
I actually thought about going.  Then I remembered I had to be in SC for my first day on the job the next day.  Missing that probably isn't the first impression I want to make.

Been there... done that.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on December 29, 2008, 12:20:33 PM
Its scary to think how many trick pass plays is being conjured up in Reids head right now going up against the leagues best run defense





Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: cj2112 on December 29, 2008, 01:31:34 PM
My only concern about this game is that the Vikings slightly resemble the Foreskins - bad QB, good running game, good run defense, average pass defense.  We couldn't crack the Skins and Peterson is better than Portis.  That being said, Cooley is better than Shiancoe and the Berrian and Wade are worse than Moss and Randle El. 

Either way, we have no excuse not to dominate provided we can contain Peterson.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: BigEd76 on December 29, 2008, 01:39:33 PM
Quote from: Butchers Bill on December 29, 2008, 03:19:49 AM
Anyone wanna go?  Ticketmaster has tickets available.

20,000 according to the Vikings.  weak
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: phillymic2000 on December 29, 2008, 01:55:25 PM
I got mine, going with a bunch of viqueen fans >:D
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on December 29, 2008, 04:23:15 PM
Peterson likes to cough it up. He's fumbled 9 times this year. The name of the game is GAP CONTROL. Stay disciplined in their gaps and he will not have anywhere to run.

The Eagles should not lose this game. No way, no how.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Tomahawk on December 29, 2008, 04:34:12 PM
Hahahahaha, just like the taterskins game.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: rjs246 on December 29, 2008, 05:09:13 PM
Peterson is not the problem. They can probably stop him. The problem is that every time Minn goes 3 and out, they will take a minute and a half off of the clock. Every time the Eagles go 3 and out they will take 30 seconds off the clock. If the Minn defense shows up early this game will be a lot closer than it should be based on TOP alone.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on December 29, 2008, 05:10:49 PM
locked and loaded free money here we come meadowlands
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on December 29, 2008, 05:35:00 PM
The Williams twins going up against Herremans-Jackson-Cole could be troublesome.

If they are going to throw, and judging by Minny's pass defense they will, they should work Westbrook on the LBs a lot.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: shorebird on December 29, 2008, 05:49:07 PM
Screen passes.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: rjs246 on December 29, 2008, 05:54:41 PM
LJ Smith in the flat.
Klecko in the flat.
Super Bowl.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on December 29, 2008, 05:55:29 PM
More gold standard talk please.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on December 29, 2008, 06:00:28 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on December 29, 2008, 05:35:00 PM
The Williams twins going up against Herremans-Jackson-Cole could be troublesome.

If they are going to throw, and judging by Minny's pass defense they will, they should work Westbrook on the LBs a lot.

Quote from: rjs246 on December 29, 2008, 05:09:13 PM
Peterson is not the problem. They can probably stop him. The problem is that every time Minn goes 3 and out, they will take a minute and a half off of the clock. Every time the Eagles go 3 and out they will take 30 seconds off the clock. If the Minn defense shows up early this game will be a lot closer than it should be based on TOP alone.

McNabb is going to have to have a stellar game in the air, and their red zone problem are going to have to correct themselves in 6 days for the Vikings are ranked 5th in the league in the red zone

Heres the numbers in case you were wondering how close this game will be..and it will be close:

Eagles run offense-22nd
Vikings run def--1st

Eagles pass offense--6th
Vikings pass def--18th

Vikings pass offense-27th
Eagles pass def-2nd

Vikings run offense--3rd
Eagles run defense--6th
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on December 29, 2008, 06:07:30 PM
I think Pat Williams has been upgraded to probable for the game now.

:boom


Now that I am getting off from the high of yesterday I am worried that Reid will lay a egg here.

All the signs are there. The Eagles think they should win this. IGY thinks they should win. Reid will pass pass pass punt.

Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: shorebird on December 29, 2008, 06:08:55 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on December 29, 2008, 05:54:41 PM
LJ Smith Cbuck in the flat.
Klecko Bwest in the flat.
Super Bowl.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 29, 2008, 06:13:04 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on December 29, 2008, 05:35:00 PM
The Williams twins going up against Herremans-Jackson-Cole could be troublesome.

Pat is out with a broken scapula.

Quote from: Magical_Retard on December 29, 2008, 06:07:30 PM
I think Pat Williams has been upgraded to probable for the game now.

Or not.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on December 29, 2008, 06:28:37 PM
or maybe

Vikings NT Pat Williams (shoulder) has been medically cleared to face the Eagles in the NFC Wild Card round.
"Pat Williams is going to try and make the push for this weekend," coach Brad Childress said.
Source: St. Paul Pioneer Press
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: rjs246 on December 29, 2008, 06:29:59 PM
Cortisone for that ass.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: MadMarchHare on December 29, 2008, 06:48:38 PM
One good forearm should re-break that clavicle.  Then it's smooth sailing.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: phillymic2000 on December 29, 2008, 07:16:56 PM
paging Mr. Runyan
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: henchmanUK on December 29, 2008, 07:22:17 PM
The bottom line is that if we have a balanced offensive attack then we win. If Reid reverts to type then we lose. I believe it really is that simple. I wish I could be all Woo-hoo and Go Birds, but as much as I will always treasure the Dallas win I am preparing for impending heartbreak.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on December 29, 2008, 07:52:40 PM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on December 29, 2008, 06:07:30 PM
I think Pat Williams has been upgraded to probable for the game now.

:boom

Caplan was on DNL earlier and said Williams was cleared but even if he plays it will be in a very limited role.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: shorebird on December 29, 2008, 08:47:22 PM
Quote from: henchmanUK on December 29, 2008, 07:22:17 PM
The bottom line is that if we have a balanced offensive attack then we win. If Reid reverts to type then we lose. I believe it really is that simple. I wish I could be all Woo-hoo and Go Birds, but as much as I will always treasure the Dallas win I am preparing for impending heartbreak.

Such is the way of life for the Philadelphia Eagle fan.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Don Ho on December 29, 2008, 09:05:17 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on December 29, 2008, 01:39:33 PM
Quote from: Butchers Bill on December 29, 2008, 03:19:49 AM
Anyone wanna go?  Ticketmaster has tickets available.

20,000 according to the Vikings.  weak

farging disgrace. 

Metrodome = Tropicana.  I love me sum catwalks.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Phanatic on December 29, 2008, 09:23:41 PM
QuoteEagles run offense-22nd
Vikings run def--1st

If this is true this could very well be pass happy offense day. Reid could justify it.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: MadMarchHare on December 29, 2008, 10:17:38 PM
Quote from: Phanatic on December 29, 2008, 09:23:41 PM
QuoteEagles run offense-22nd
Vikings run def--1st

If this is true this could very well be pass happy offense day. Reid could justify it.


Run offense is based solely on yardage gained.  Their numbers are low because they run so infrequently, not because it's ineffective.  If Reid doesn't know this (and he might not) he should be lit on fire.  Hell, just set him ablaze anyway.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Tomahawk on December 29, 2008, 10:34:55 PM
That's true that teams run less against the Vikings, but their Run D only gives up 3.3 yards a pop which ties the Steelers for tops in the NFL.

Looking at all the run stats, I noticed the Eagles D is by far the best in the league regarding big run plays. The longest they let up is only 28 yds, making them one of only three teams never to allow a 40 yard+ gain on the ground
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Diomedes on December 29, 2008, 11:34:47 PM
Quote from: Tomahawk on December 29, 2008, 10:34:55 PMLooking at all the run stats, I noticed the Eagles D is by far the best in the league regarding big run plays. The longest they let up is only 28 yds, and never anything over 40 yards

huh?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Tomahawk on December 29, 2008, 11:59:48 PM
Long day and I are stoopid
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Phanatic on December 30, 2008, 02:27:21 AM
Quote from: Tomahawk on December 29, 2008, 11:59:48 PM
Long day and I are stoopid

Just blame alcohol!!


Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Feva on December 30, 2008, 07:57:36 AM
Reid vs. Marty or Mary vs. Reid (http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/eagles/20081230_Rich_Hofmann__Eagles__Reid_might_have_to_take_unbalanced_approach_vs__Vikings.html)

QuoteRich Hofmann: Eagles, Reid might have to take unbalanced approach vs. Vikings
By Rich Hofmann
Philadelphia Daily News

Daily News Sports Columnist

THE CAMERA/LISTENING device was secreted in Andy Reid's office during his news conference yesterday. The tapes and transcripts of his conversation with offensive coordinator Marty Mornhinweg were available by nightfall.
Andy: We can't do this, can we?

Marty: Look at the numbers.

Andy: But we can't.

Marty: Will you look at how hard it is to run the ball against them? Will you look?


Reid picked up a pile of paper and began to rifle through the stack. A closeup from the camera revealed what Mornhinweg was talking about. The numbers showed that the Minnesota Vikings have the No. 1 run defense in the National Football League. The numbers showed that only the Baltimore Ravens have had to defend fewer running plays this season than the Vikings.

Many teams give up on the run very, very early against the Vikings - that was on another of the sheets that Reid was studying. A couple of teams really didn't even try. And now, with a playoff date against the Vikings coming next on the Eagles' schedule, the angst was writ large on Reid's face.

He shuffled through the papers some more, then looked up.

Andy: But what about the last 5 weeks?

Marty: I know, I know - it's worked out well. A couple of more runs in the first half have made a big difference.

Andy: So we have to keep doing it.

Marty: I agree.

Andy: So what are we arguing about?

Marty: We're arguing about what we should do when the run doesn't work.

Andy: Aren't you the optimist.

Marty: Just a realist.


Reid went back to the paperwork. Again, the camera revealed the numbers. They painted an interesting change in Reid during the course of the season, an evolution of falling expectations for his passing game.

Everything changed on the day the coach benched quarterback Donovan McNabb at halftime in Baltimore. Before that game, the numbers show an offense that tried to function when it called passing plays 69 percent of the time in the first half. It worked great for a long time. The Eagles averaged more than 16 points in the first half of their first nine games.

But then came the disasters against Cincinnati and Baltimore. After that, Reid and Mornhinweg got religion. Their playcalling changed to 57 percent passing plays in the first half in the last five games. That amounts to four more runs in each of those first halves - more than a tweak, not quite a revolution but definitely noticeable. It worked well in four games out of five, the scoring almost returning to the Eagles' pre-Cincinnati level.

The town likes the better balance. The team likes the better balance.

Reid looked up again from the sheets.

Andy: Some of these numbers are pretty lopsided.

Marty: I told you. Look at Arizona.

Andy: I know - 22 passes and four runs in their first half against the Vikings. But they're crazier than we are anyway.

Marty: Look at New Orleans - 32 passes, eight runs. Look at Jacksonville - 29 passes, eight runs. Chicago, 20 to six. Indianapolis, 22 to nine. Even the Giants on Sunday threw it 60 percent of the time in the first half.

Andy: What's the league average?

Marty: It's 67 percent passes in the first half against Minnesota.

Andy: How about the teams that beat them?

Marty: Still high - 63 percent passes.

Andy: But we're supposed to keep running, right?


Earlier, at his news conference, Reid was talking about some of his protégés among NFL coaches, including Baltimore's John Harbaugh and the Vikings' Brad Childress. Both of them run the ball a bunch.

Reid said, "That's what they have chosen to do. That's their little wrinkle to the thing. They have done it more than probably anybody in this [West Coast] system and done it very well. Brad has one of the best, if not the best running back in the National Football League right now [in Adrian Peterson], maybe the MVP of the National Football League. He's given him the ball a lot and I understand that. He's a heck of a player."

But that is not Reid's philosophy. Whatever balance has been added in the last few weeks has only been because of the crises in Cincinnati and Baltimore.

But, well, now what? Will Reid yield to temptation or stay with the recent plan? Will he stick with the run in the first half, even against that No. 1 run defense? Will he stick with it even if it doesn't produce immediate results? Will he stick with it even if the Eagles fall behind? And if he does lean a little more to the pass, will it be only a little more and not what happened in the second half against the taterskins?

These are the questions. Meanwhile, on the video, Reid and Mornhinweg silently pored over the data.


If this conversation really took place, you can't tell me these roles weren't reversed.  Get ready for pass, pass, pass, punt.  Maybe the defense can get 2 more TD's.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on December 30, 2008, 08:12:49 AM
you dont not run because the vikings have a good run defense

you run because they have jared allen
you run because the noise in the dome will be fierce (stay out of the shotgun as much as possible)
you run so that your play action works
you run because you have a great rb tandem
you run because minnesota is not going to put up a lot of pts


no one is saying it has to be 50/50 and the game will dictate which way you lean more but they better have a healthy dose of it in the game plan and they better not abandoned it in the first half if its not working
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Feva on December 30, 2008, 08:21:18 AM
You only have to run enough so that the run remains a threat... and so that they can't just tee off and charge McNabb every down because their D-line CAN get to the QB.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 30, 2008, 09:52:23 AM
Gotta run.  If the Eagles call more than 20 run plays, they win the game.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Feva on December 30, 2008, 10:18:10 AM
NFL.com (http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/story?id=09000d5d80db634e&template=with-video-with-comments&confirm=true)

QuoteNo. 6 Philadelphia (9-6-1) at No. 3 Minnesota (10-6)
Vikings coach Andy Reid will be facing his former longtime assistant Brad Childress, who served as Reid's offensive coordinator for four seasons (2002-05). Both coaches faced scrutiny about their job security at different points this season but now appear to be in good shape.

Each team needed season-ending victories to get into the playoffs. Vikings running back Adrian Peterson has been on a mission the past two months but will be facing the NFL's fourth-stingiest run defense. The key could be Vikings quarterback Tarvaris Jackson, who has played fairly well since regaining his starting job a month ago. The onus will be on both Jackson and McNabb to make plays in the passing game since Minnesota and Philadelphia boast two of the NFL's top run defenses.

This will be the Eagles' first game this season in a dome. Minnesota is 6-2 at home with the only two losses coming against dome teams, Atlanta and Indianapolis.  :paranoid

Matchups to watch
» Vikings DE Jared Allen against Eagles OT Tra Thomas: NFL sack leader DeMarcus Ware needed three sacks against the Eagles on Sunday to break Michael Strahan's sack record of 22.5. Thanks to Thomas, Ware didn't come close to Donovan McNabb all day.

» Eagles CB Asante Samuel vs. Vikings WR Bernard Berrian: Philadelphia has allowed individual wide outs to have some big games, but that's typically happened when those receivers are on teams playing from behind. Samuel is one of the best cover guys in the business. Berrian is one of the top big-play threats in the league, averaging 20.1 yards a catch.

They HAVE to get off to a good start... get that crowd somewhat out of it early.  If they let the Vikes get momentum early... I'm not in love with the thought of the Eagles getting it back.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: General_Failure on December 30, 2008, 10:46:57 AM
What crowd? Weren't there 20,000 tickets still available?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: phattymatty on December 30, 2008, 10:49:29 AM
for real, you can get tickets on craigslist right now for $35.  up to 7 together.  if it wasn't the last game of the weekend i'd think about going up for it. 
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on December 30, 2008, 11:15:46 AM
none of their regular season games were blacked out...im guessing since they didnt even know there were gonna have a game until sunday afternoon no one wanted to front money for tickets in this economy....it will be sold out and loud
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on December 30, 2008, 11:16:02 AM
45% of Minny's season ticket holders passed on buying tickets.That is crazy.Gonna be a green crowd there.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on December 30, 2008, 11:22:20 AM
http://www.startribune.com/sports/vikings/36862649.html?elr=KArksUUUycaEacyU
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on December 30, 2008, 11:35:44 AM
I wish I could make it up there. I checked flights and it is too late in the week to find deals and for whatever reason Sunday is a blackout day for me to use my OnePass miles. Southwest doesn't start flying to MSP until March 8th.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: General_Failure on December 30, 2008, 11:57:32 AM
Hop on the IGY express train?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: fansince61 on December 30, 2008, 12:13:36 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on December 30, 2008, 11:35:44 AM
I wish I could make it up there. I checked flights and it is too late in the week to find deals and for whatever reason Sunday is a blackout day for me to use my OnePass miles. Southwest doesn't start flying to MSP until March 8th.

I think Air Tran has flights
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on December 30, 2008, 12:14:34 PM
cant take a train from houston to minneapolis

cue dio rant
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on December 30, 2008, 02:52:38 PM
Wonder if Thomas Tapeh's sister is going
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: General_Failure on December 30, 2008, 03:50:42 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on December 30, 2008, 02:52:38 PM
Wonder if Thomas Tapeh's sister is going

Anita Tapeh?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: MadMarchHare on December 30, 2008, 06:07:41 PM
I was all set to go, looked up tickets at 3PM yesterday, from O'Hare they were 218+fees.  Didn't book until I could confirm with the wife.
Went to buy airline tickets at 9:30 that night:  882+fees.  What.The.farg.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Tomahawk on December 30, 2008, 06:24:48 PM
It's only a six hour drive
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on December 30, 2008, 07:02:30 PM
Probably only a few hours by train
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on December 30, 2008, 10:02:43 PM
Interesting stat I'll just throw in this thread and that is the Eagles D has scored more TDs (3) than they've let up (2) in the month of December
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: MadMarchHare on December 30, 2008, 10:12:13 PM
Quote from: Tomahawk on December 30, 2008, 06:24:48 PM
It's only a six hour drive

Yeah, but the guys I was going with are in DC, which was $1300.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Feva on December 31, 2008, 04:38:07 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on December 30, 2008, 10:02:43 PM
Interesting stat I'll just throw in this thread and that is the Eagles D has scored more TDs (3) than they've let up (2) in the month of December

... and of those 2 TD's... one was in garbage time, the other was an 18 yard drive.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Cerevant on December 31, 2008, 06:42:29 AM
Quote from: MadMarchHare on December 30, 2008, 10:12:13 PM
Quote from: Tomahawk on December 30, 2008, 06:24:48 PM
It's only a six hour drive

Yeah, but the guys I was going with are in DC, which was $1300.

Supply and demand - everyone going to Minny is connecting through ORD.  There was a bit on CSN about Eagles fans going after tickets.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Diomedes on December 31, 2008, 08:59:25 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on December 30, 2008, 12:14:34 PM
cant take a train from houston to minneapolis

cue dio rant

for real.  what kind of backwoods country is this that you can't take a train between a city with five and a half million people and another 1200 miles away with three million?

I think Africa has better transportation
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on December 31, 2008, 09:42:51 AM
they do trust me

I can get from Tanzania to Botswana in under 4 hours on the long-neck ostrich
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on December 31, 2008, 10:11:51 AM
stop.
trying.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: phillymic2000 on December 31, 2008, 01:07:46 PM
Try flying into milwaukee instead of Chicago, I usually find cheaper flights out of there.

Also as of this morning there are still 11,000 tickets left :-D

http://blogs.startribune.com/vikingsblog/?p=2361 (http://blogs.startribune.com/vikingsblog/?p=2361)

Is anyone going to the game?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: MadMarchHare on December 31, 2008, 06:22:11 PM
I'm actually half-way between O'Hare and Mitchell (Gurnee).  The problem is the cheapest flights from Milwaukee are similarly priced, and connect through O'Hare. :boom
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: phillymic2000 on December 31, 2008, 06:25:31 PM
Me and a buddy are driving up early sunday and coming back sunday night, if you want to ride with us it's all good!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: stalker on January 01, 2009, 12:26:42 AM
First post of 2009! The year the Eagles win the Superbowl!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: General_Failure on January 01, 2009, 01:15:27 AM
Or, much preferably, the year you get your johnson stuck in a wheat thresher.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 01, 2009, 03:19:21 AM
Suck my jagnon
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: QB Eagles on January 01, 2009, 09:38:15 AM
QuoteEDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. -- The NFL has given the Minnesota Vikings and the Arizona Cardinals extensions to sell more tickets and avoid local TV blackouts of their playoff games this weekend.

Arizona hosts the Atlanta Falcons on Saturday, and the Philadelphia Eagles play at Minnesota on Sunday.

The Cardinals have until 4:30 p.m. EST Thursday to sell their remaining 5,600 tickets.

As of midday Wednesday, the Vikings had 11,000 tickets to sell by 4:30 p.m. EST Friday to satisfy the league's sellout requirements and ensure the game will be broadcast. Help from the Fox affiliate and corporate sponsors is possible.

The Vikings haven't been blacked out since 1997.

The Eagles are encouraging their fans to take advantage of the supply and travel to the game.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 01, 2009, 10:57:14 AM
I don't understand how you can have zero blackouts for 11 years yet still have 20,000 seats available for a playoff game.  I could see a few thousand simply because the Vikings don't require season ticket holders to purchase playoff tickets (like the Eagles do, incidentally) but 20,000?  WTF?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: shorebird on January 01, 2009, 11:09:34 AM
It's disgraceful.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Wingspan on January 01, 2009, 12:50:18 PM
Yeah, it's a disgrace that these people are more concerned about saving money while still keeping their jobs, or finding work at all in a region that is hit particularly hard with job losses right now.

It's a disgrace that the NFL will not see beyond their own greedy noses and perhaps lift the blackouts in these regions, particularly at this time.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: stalker on January 01, 2009, 12:54:21 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on January 01, 2009, 12:50:18 PM
Yeah, it's a disgrace that these people are more concerned about saving money while still keeping their jobs, or finding work at all in a region that is hit particularly hard with job losses right now.

It's a disgrace that the NFL will not see beyond their own greedy noses and perhaps lift the blackouts in these regions, particularly at this time.

Grand farging slam!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: shorebird on January 01, 2009, 01:14:02 PM
Bullshtein. They won thier division and it's the first time they've been in the playoffs in years. Get down off the soapbox.

extension (//http://)

QuoteI wouldn't know what that problem is, possibly it's the holidays, and possibly it's a moot point by the time we get to Sunday."

Also, although Minnisota's uneployment rate is up, as they are all across the country, they are still lower than the rest of the nation as a whole. So the thought of that area getting hit "particularly hard with job losses right now" is crap.

In all fairness though, I didn't realize that the Vikings don't make season ticket holders buy playoff game tickets. That could be your 11,000 right there.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 01, 2009, 01:27:21 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on January 01, 2009, 12:50:18 PM
Yeah, it's a disgrace that these people are more concerned about saving money while still keeping their jobs, or finding work at all in a region that is hit particularly hard with job losses right now.

It's a disgrace that the NFL will not see beyond their own greedy noses and perhaps lift the blackouts in these regions, particularly at this time.

There's so much wrong with this ridiculous post I don't even know where to begin mocking it.

Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: phillymic2000 on January 01, 2009, 01:34:38 PM
there is tickects still available for 30 fargin bucks. I creamed myself when I got tickets at face value. This is the 1st home playoff game for them since 2000.

Also the dolphins sold out with the quickness, and all those jews down there got ripped off by Madoff, so no excuses.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 01, 2009, 01:44:14 PM
Nah.   They should just give the tickets away.  After all, corporate handouts are in vogue right now.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: phillymic2000 on January 01, 2009, 01:45:31 PM
maybe the vikings organization should ask for a bailout.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 01, 2009, 01:55:09 PM
Maybe this is why they're having trouble selling tickets (http://www.vikings.com/AkamaiPlayer.aspx?AkamaiVideo=AdrainEaglesTickets)
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 01, 2009, 02:12:02 PM
That might be the most embarrassing thing I've ever witnessed.

Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 01, 2009, 03:36:53 PM
That's the best they could come up with?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: JackStraw on January 01, 2009, 04:02:25 PM
Quote from: Geowhizzer on January 01, 2009, 03:36:53 PM
That's the best they could come up with?

I dunno - Al Franken and Jesse Ventura come to mind...
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: phattymatty on January 01, 2009, 04:06:20 PM
QuoteEagles 30, Vikings 10: There isn't a worse team in the NFC for the Vikings to match up against than the Eagles. And I'm not saying merely as some sort of retarded reverse jinx. It's true. The Vikings are not a difficult team to scheme against. If you have a QB that's mobile enough to elude the rush of the front four, and you have a well-coached defense that can bottle up Purple Jesus (who's been playing a killer game of Hot Patato with the ball lately. OMIGOD, IS THAT A FOOTBALL?! EW! GROSS! GET IT OFF ME!), you beat them.

Well, the Eagles have both those components. Donovan McNabb may eat empanadas like a farging champ, but he's still fleet afoot enough to run away from Jared Allen and hit his targets on the go. And while Andy Reid's weekly strategy of passing the ball 80 times a game is idiotic against a normal team, it's the exact right thing to do against the Vikings defense. The Vikings farging love it when teams try and run the ball on them just for the sake of running the ball. But they get put on their heels by any team that refuses to play into their hands and deploys the short passing game all day long, as the Eagles and Bucs do.

Also working in the Eagles' favor is the fact that Brian Westbrook is an edge rusher who won't bother with trying to run at the Williams wall (Pat Williams will play in this game). Chris Johnson was able to get yards against the Vikings by running just outside the tackles and then straight up the field, and Westbrook can do the same.

At some point, Andy Reid and Donovan McNabb will farg up in these playoffs, but it's not going to be against this team. I assure you, when it comes to clock management and the two-minute-drill, Brad Childress and Tarvaris Jackson make Reid and McNabb look like farging Swiss-engineered models of precision.

(Note: Brian Baldinger did the color for last week's Vikings-Giants game. A lot of people have pointed out Baldy's signature mangled pinky, with Simmons being the earliest. Whenever Baldy makes a point with the camera on him, I can't take anything he says seriously, because it always looks like he's making shadow puppets as he's talking. "I think what the Giants need to do in this half is LOOK KIDS! A DOG! WOOF!")
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: JackStraw on January 01, 2009, 04:23:21 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on January 01, 2009, 04:06:20 PM
QuoteAt some point, Andy Reid and Donovan McNabb will farg up in these playoffs,

Cliff Notes version...
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Wingspan on January 01, 2009, 06:37:34 PM
Quote from: Rome on January 01, 2009, 01:27:21 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on January 01, 2009, 12:50:18 PM
Yeah, it's a disgrace that these people are more concerned about saving money while still keeping their jobs, or finding work at all in a region that is hit particularly hard with job losses right now.

It's a disgrace that the NFL will not see beyond their own greedy noses and perhaps lift the blackouts in these regions, particularly at this time.

There's so much wrong with this ridiculous post I don't even know where to begin mocking it.



Hurry up and pick a spot, sparky.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: BigEd76 on January 01, 2009, 06:41:03 PM
Quote from: Geowhizzer on January 01, 2009, 03:36:53 PM
That's the best they could come up with?

and they couldn't even spell their best player's name right in the link
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: henchmanUK on January 01, 2009, 09:30:28 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on January 01, 2009, 06:41:03 PM
Quote from: Geowhizzer on January 01, 2009, 03:36:53 PM
That's the best they could come up with?

and they couldn't even spell their best player's name right in the link
:-D
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: pinoyboy2pt0 on January 01, 2009, 09:49:04 PM
has anyone followed chad greenway?  i followed him a little in college, then he blew out his knee and was wondering how he's been since.

looking at his stats he seems to be doing alright.  not like we're going to run the ball at him anyway.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Yeti on January 01, 2009, 10:15:34 PM
Playing the Vikings in the playoff is like having a bye week.

Birds 42
Vikings 0


That's right.

Bring on Peytons cross eyed retard brother.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Don Ho on January 01, 2009, 11:01:47 PM
Quote from: JackStraw on January 01, 2009, 04:23:21 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on January 01, 2009, 04:06:20 PM
QuoteAt some point, Andy Reid and Donovan McNabb will farg up in these playoffs,

Cliff Notes version...

in other words 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2006.........................
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: 4and26 on January 01, 2009, 11:36:33 PM
This week they win and easily - next week?

Eagles   31
Yikes      10
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Tomahawk on January 02, 2009, 12:40:50 AM
Quote from: phattymatty on January 01, 2009, 04:06:20 PM
QuoteEagles 30, Vikings 10: There isn't a worse team in the NFC for the Vikings to match up against than the Eagles. And I'm not saying merely as some sort of retarded reverse jinx. It's true. The Vikings are not a difficult team to scheme against. If you have a QB that's mobile enough to elude the rush of the front four, and you have a well-coached defense that can bottle up Purple Jesus (who's been playing a killer game of Hot Patato with the ball lately. OMIGOD, IS THAT A FOOTBALL?! EW! GROSS! GET IT OFF ME!), you beat them.

Well, the Eagles have both those components. Donovan McNabb may eat empanadas like a farging champ, but he's still fleet afoot enough to run away from Jared Allen and hit his targets on the go. And while Andy Reid's weekly strategy of passing the ball 80 times a game is idiotic against a normal team, it's the exact right thing to do against the Vikings defense. The Vikings farging love it when teams try and run the ball on them just for the sake of running the ball. But they get put on their heels by any team that refuses to play into their hands and deploys the short passing game all day long, as the Eagles and Bucs do.

Also working in the Eagles' favor is the fact that Brian Westbrook is an edge rusher who won't bother with trying to run at the Williams wall (Pat Williams will play in this game). Chris Johnson was able to get yards against the Vikings by running just outside the tackles and then straight up the field, and Westbrook can do the same.

At some point, Andy Reid and Donovan McNabb will farg up in these playoffs, but it's not going to be against this team. I assure you, when it comes to clock management and the two-minute-drill, Brad Childress and Tarvaris Jackson make Reid and McNabb look like farging Swiss-engineered models of precision.

(Note: Brian Baldinger did the color for last week's Vikings-Giants game. A lot of people have pointed out Baldy's signature mangled pinky, with Simmons being the earliest. Whenever Baldy makes a point with the camera on him, I can't take anything he says seriously, because it always looks like he's making shadow puppets as he's talking. "I think what the Giants need to do in this half is LOOK KIDS! A DOG! WOOF!")

That can't be true
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: QB Eagles on January 02, 2009, 01:05:52 AM
I've seen enough Vikings games this season to know that yes, it actually is true. Childress has to be the worst clock manager in the whole league.

Earlier in the year, while losing to the Titans, he punted away with a couple minutes left in the hopes his defense could get a stop and the Vikings could get the ball back. The Titans than kneeled down three straight times and ended the game.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Don Ho on January 02, 2009, 03:22:26 AM
Quote from: phillymic2000 on January 01, 2009, 01:34:38 PM
there is tickects still available for 30 fargin bucks. I creamed myself when I got tickets at face value. This is the 1st home playoff game for them since 2000.

WTF is going up there?  My buddy calls on Target HQ in Minneapolis and he said he scored great seats on Tuesday afternoon for face value.  Am I missing something?  It's not like the Metrodome holds 110,000 people.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on January 02, 2009, 06:24:03 AM
Quote from: Rome on January 01, 2009, 01:27:21 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on January 01, 2009, 12:50:18 PM
Yeah, it's a disgrace that these people are more concerned about saving money while still keeping their jobs, or finding work at all in a region that is hit particularly hard with job losses right now.

It's a disgrace that the NFL will not see beyond their own greedy noses and perhaps lift the blackouts in these regions, particularly at this time.

There's so much wrong with this ridiculous post I don't even know where to begin mocking it.


hes just trying to be contridictory....but yes its a ridiculous post
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on January 02, 2009, 09:30:20 AM
Quote from: QB Eagles on January 02, 2009, 01:05:52 AM
I've seen enough Vikings games this season to know that yes, it actually is true. Childress has to be the worst clock manager in the whole league.

Earlier in the year, while losing to the Titans, he punted away with a couple minutes left in the hopes his defense could get a stop and the Vikings could get the ball back. The Titans than kneeled down three straight times and ended the game.

unreal that game....1:50 something to go in the 4th, you have no timeouts and you elect to punt?

I see why they cant get that place to sell out...faith might have something to do with it

Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on January 02, 2009, 09:36:28 AM
If a Minnesota Vikings game is played in the Metrodome and no one in the Twin Cities can watch it on TV, did it really happen?

The team must sell out Sunday's playoff game with the Philadelphia Eagles by today's 3:30 p.m. deadline imposed by the NFL to avoid a TV blackout. As of noon Thursday, about 8,000 tickets remained.

And that's a big hurdle to clear in the current difficult economic environment.

But late Thursday afternoon, hope emerged the deadline might be pushed back after the Arizona Cardinals received a second 24-hour extension. Minnesota might benefit if the league grants a similar delay.

Steve LaCroix, Vikings vice president of sales and marketing, isn't counting on an assist from the league, though.

"The league office addresses each market individually, so there is no guarantee of a similar extension being granted in our situation," he said.

There's certainly plenty of work to do. LaCroix said the Vikings have hired additional staff and contracted with a third-party call center to get the job done.

Ticketmaster sent an e-mail to a million customers, hoping to entice them.

And the Vikings' call center will make about 10,000 to 12,000 sales calls this week to season-ticket holders and fans.

If the game doesn't sell out, fans won't be able to see the game on TV in the Twin Cities or secondary markets.

LaCroix said fans might have to drive up to two hours outside of the Twin Cities to watch the game because of the way the TV markets are defined.

The Vikings have sold out 114 consecutive home games, dating to the 1997 regular-season finale against Indianapolis.

On Monday, the team announced it had 20,000 tickets left. Over the next three days, 12,000 were sold.

LaCroix said no major corporate sponsors are lined up to buy the remaining tickets.

"They're in the same boat as everybody else," he said. "It's the start of a new quarter in a very tough financial and economic environment. There's no one that's going to come in and save the day at this point. When you have this many seats still available, it ends up being a pretty expensive proposition.

"As that (number of unsold tickets) starts to really tighten down, maybe we can have something like that happen. But at this point, there's nothing lined up."

Some season-ticket holders aren't surprised at the large number of unsold tickets.

"I think it's 50-50," said season-ticket holder Shane Eckes, of Cottage Grove. "I think part of it is price. I think part of it is performance.

"I've been a die-hard Viking fan my whole life, and a lot of my family. We just haven't been impressed with the (coach) Brad Childress era."

Tickets range from $30 to $160, and plenty of the high-end seats remain.

Eckes said the Vikings haven't marketed the team's playoff appearance well. On Dec. 1, the Vikings mailed invoices to their 55,000 season-ticket holders asking them to renew their seats for the playoffs by Dec. 19. Only 55 percent of them renewed.

Some were apprehensive because they didn't know whether the Vikings would make the playoffs.

Some fans, like Eckes, said they believed they had to make a deposit on potential playoff tickets and weren't aware that the team was offering single-game packages.

Longtime Vikings season-ticket holder Dean Hovey, of Stillwater, said he was disappointed his renewal invoice came Dec. 17, two days before a deadline that since has been extended.

"If it had come the first week of December, I probably would have been able to talk my wife into giving me that for a Christmas present," Hovey said.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: DH on January 02, 2009, 10:04:30 AM
10,000 eagles fans?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 02, 2009, 10:58:39 AM
Are Curtis and Baskett playing in this game?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on January 02, 2009, 11:07:58 AM
Baskett fully participated in practice yesterday
Curtis is fine as well
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on January 02, 2009, 11:37:24 AM
phew!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 02, 2009, 11:43:24 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 02, 2009, 11:37:24 AM
phew!

well since they will pass all day might as well have those guys in the lineup. better than reggie brown at least.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on January 02, 2009, 11:52:20 AM
i dont think they are....if the eagles balance the offense and protect the quarterback every wr they have other than pimp is interchangable

if baskett and brown played it would be no different than if curtis and lewis played which would be no different than if avant and baskett played
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: phattymatty on January 02, 2009, 12:12:13 PM
so the vikings have sold out 114 straight games, yet they can't sell out a playoff game?  dumb. 
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SunMo on January 02, 2009, 12:15:13 PM
the hard economic times started after game 114, duh
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 02, 2009, 12:23:14 PM
Nah - like Winger said, it's the greedy NFL who's to blame here, not the poor suffering fans of the Twin Cities.

Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: phattymatty on January 02, 2009, 12:42:53 PM
i looked on ticketmaster a few days ago and upper level seats were going for $160.  that is a bit retarded. 
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: MDS on January 02, 2009, 12:53:15 PM
serves them right for being the gay purple team
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Diomedes on January 02, 2009, 12:58:27 PM
the Ravens say hi
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: General_Failure on January 02, 2009, 12:58:58 PM
Psh, teams named after poems can't be gay.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 02, 2009, 01:21:25 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on January 02, 2009, 12:58:27 PM
the Ravens say hi

The Ravens are prison sex gay.  The Vikings are ABBA gay.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: QB Eagles on January 02, 2009, 01:26:27 PM
:-D
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 02, 2009, 01:30:36 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 02, 2009, 11:52:20 AM
i dont think they are....if the eagles balance the offense and protect the quarterback every wr they have other than pimp is interchangable

if baskett and brown played it would be no different than if curtis and lewis played which would be no different than if avant and baskett played

WRONG.

Curtis has speed.

Avant has hands.

Baskett has height.

All suck equally.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: QB Eagles on January 02, 2009, 01:35:44 PM
All are better than Brown and Lewis.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on January 02, 2009, 02:03:26 PM
runyan per usual didnt practice and will play
westbrook limited practice
lj smith practiced with the second team...celek will start
samuel hurt his hip yesterday and did not practice will be listed as questionable

Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on January 02, 2009, 02:32:25 PM
According to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, it's looking "more and more" like Vikings NT Pat Williams (shoulder) will sit out Sunday's playoff game.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 02, 2009, 03:02:34 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 02, 2009, 02:03:26 PM
samuel hurt his hip yesterday and did not practice will be listed as questionable

If they can keep Arizona's passing offense in check without Samuel, the vaunted Tarvaris Jackson/Berrian connection shouldn't be too much of a problem.  It would be much worse if they were down a DE or LB.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 02, 2009, 04:08:15 PM
Link (http://footballoutsiders.com/walkthrough/2009/walkthrough-i-am-gm)

QuoteEagles at Vikings

The Eagles don't play against opponents. They play against themselves. When the Eagles are playing well, particularly on offense, the opponent is almost irrelevant. When the are playing poorly, its usually because of their own dumb mistakes -- short yardage futility, an unwillingness to even pretend to run the ball -- not because the opponent played exceptionally or used some clever scheme to stop them.

I used to think that this was just an Eagles fan's perspective. But after watching the Eagles beat the Giants, get swept by the taterskins, tie the Bengals, and perform other feats of bipolarity this season, I'm convinced that it makes more sense to analyze Eagles Success vs. Eagles Mistakes than to really look at matchups.

The Vikings enter the playoffs with Tarvaris Jackson at quarterback and an offense built around I-formation running with Adrian Peterson and Chester Taylor. The Eagles defense, which is as consistent as the offense is frustrating, will have no trouble limiting the Vikings to 17 points or less. It's up to the Eagles offense to play the way it did in the last five weeks (minus the taterskins game). With Brian Westbrook, Correll Buckhalter, and Kevin Curtis all healthy, the Eagles have the weapons to drop 31 points on Sunday. The meeting between Brad Childress and former mentor Andy Reid should be a mismatch, unless the erratic Donovan McNabb shows up, or DeSean Jackson drops three passes, or the third-and-1 hitch pass to a tight end returns to the playbook.

The Eagles are good enough to beat any team in the NFL. They are also bad enough to lose to (or at least tie) anyone. I believe the good Eagles will show up on Sunday, but I won't make any promises after that
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 02, 2009, 07:10:49 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs2008/news/story?id=3806380

Pathetic.

Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 02, 2009, 07:18:27 PM
Damn economy, maybe Minny should get in touch with FHF
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 02, 2009, 09:31:28 PM
I sure hope Samuel will be OK; when I read that I thought of how Vincent always went down in practice the days before playoff games.

If Asante cant play, Salty Lito will go out there and sabotage the team.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: shorebird on January 02, 2009, 10:36:31 PM
The Eagles need Samuel for this game. He's the kind of player that comes up big in big games.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: rjs246 on January 02, 2009, 10:39:39 PM
Like when he dropped the game-clinching INT in the superbowl last year?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: shorebird on January 02, 2009, 11:01:11 PM
Game clinching?? No.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: QB Eagles on January 02, 2009, 11:03:32 PM
You don't think intercepting Eli Manning with 1:15 left in the Super Bowl and the score 14-10 Patriots would have clinched the game?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: shorebird on January 02, 2009, 11:12:58 PM
Yeah, it probably would have. It's just ironic that everyone uses the word 'clinch', when the ball was anything but 'clinched'.

Besides, I'm trying to think positive.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: General_Failure on January 02, 2009, 11:21:47 PM
What's positive about Samuels not making a pick, game winning or otherwise?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: shorebird on January 02, 2009, 11:24:33 PM
Yeah..........well, nothing.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: MadMarchHare on January 03, 2009, 08:17:28 AM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 02, 2009, 09:31:28 PM
I sure hope Samuel will be OK; when I read that I thought of how Vincent always went down in practice the days before playoff games.

If Asante cant play, Salty Lito will go out there and sabotage the team.

At this point, I'm not sure Salty Lito would start if Samuel's a no-go.  Sure seems like Hanson has locked up the 3rd corner.  Of course, Lito would be pressed into service as the nickel then.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 03, 2009, 08:36:12 AM
I'm pretty sure Lito would get the start since he has a ton of playoff experience, Hanson is fine in the nickel role. Makes you wonder what's gonna happen with Lito in the offseason, he certainly has nothing to boast about since he's now a 4th corner, so since he has no leg to stand on he and Drew will come up with some outrageous conspiracy scenario where the Eagles didn't want to play him because he wants a new deal. Personally I'd keep his disgruntled ass unless a team offers a decent pick because his trade value is at it's lowest.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Diomedes on January 03, 2009, 08:56:24 AM
A conspiracy theory such as that wouldn't be so crazy.  It will of course be perceived as crazy by the media and much of the rest of the league though.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 03, 2009, 09:05:37 AM
Lito's stolen money all year long but like SD I'd keep his ass on the team if for no other reason than he's better as a backup than pretty much anyone else they could get.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on January 03, 2009, 01:04:31 PM
drew would be right if he thought that

and samuel has more dropped int's this year than munson has faked drunk posts
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Diomedes on January 03, 2009, 01:05:30 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 03, 2009, 01:04:31 PMand samuel has more dropped int's this year than munson has faked drunk posts

ftfy
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: henchmanUK on January 03, 2009, 02:16:54 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 03, 2009, 08:36:12 AM
I'm pretty sure Lito would get the start since he has a ton of playoff experience, Hanson is fine in the nickel role. Makes you wonder what's gonna happen with Lito in the offseason, he certainly has nothing to boast about since he's now a 4th corner, so since he has no leg to stand on he and Drew will come up with some outrageous conspiracy scenario where the Eagles didn't want to play him because he wants a new deal. Personally I'd keep his disgruntled ass unless a team offers a decent pick because his trade value is at it's lowest.

I'd just cut him. First round picks eat cap room.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: BigEd76 on January 03, 2009, 03:59:53 PM
1700 tickets remaining at the final blackout deadline
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 03, 2009, 04:05:07 PM
Fight the power, Minnesota!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: rjs246 on January 03, 2009, 04:06:40 PM
I love that there was a huge push to buy up the tickets and that it fell just short. Suckers.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: General_Failure on January 03, 2009, 04:42:52 PM
I love the idea of going up to a ticket office on game day and getting seats. To hell with the blackout rules.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on January 03, 2009, 05:43:46 PM
cant believe a local business or corporation isnt going to buy them up
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: BigEd76 on January 03, 2009, 06:15:50 PM
blackout lifted (http://www.vikings.com/NewsArticle_gamesoldout010309.aspx) but you can still get tickets
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: paco on January 03, 2009, 06:16:09 PM
nm
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 03, 2009, 06:28:54 PM
Quote from: paco on January 03, 2009, 06:16:09 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on January 03, 2009, 03:59:53 PM
1700 tickets remaining at the final blackout deadline
ESPN just called you a liar (http://"http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs2008/news/story?id=3807976")

I just called you a suck at teh posting guy.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: rjs246 on January 03, 2009, 07:49:30 PM
Did anyone post this yet? (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs2008/news/story?id=3808201)

Samuel slated to start.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Feva on January 04, 2009, 11:55:16 AM
Little interesting stat.

Read somewhere that 16 different players recorded at least 1 sack this year for the Eagles.  Strong.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: QB Eagles on January 04, 2009, 12:09:50 PM
The defense hasn't been this good since the Gang Green days. Top 5 in points allowed, total yards allowed, passing yards allowed, yards per play, third down conversion rate, fourth down conversion rate, and penalty yards allowed.

According to Q, Jim Johnson has about 25 different blitzes ready to go in this game.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on January 04, 2009, 12:33:38 PM
this defense isnt as good as the 2001-2003 defense
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 04, 2009, 12:45:59 PM
Gotta be careful of Jackson's scrambling. I hope they have someone set up to spy him. Because he could be like the early McNabb days with those shoddy receivers. RUn around for awhile, make a few guys miss and find someone deep enough to make a play.

I think Peterson gets stopped....but may break a long one for a score.

Eagles - 27
Vikes - 16

Mikell
Westbrook

Those are the two impact players today
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 04, 2009, 12:51:25 PM
QuoteEAGLES EXEC WONDERS WHICH TEAM WILL SHOW UP
Posted by Mike Florio on January 4, 2009, 12:19 p.m.

It might be a motivational ploy.  Regardless, it's an accurate observaton.

A member of the Eagles front office has told ESPN's Sal Paolantonio, "We don't know which team will show up [on Sunday at Minnesota].  We have no idea."

The statement is a reference to the fact that, while generally playing well since Thanksgiving, the Eagles still have the potential to lay an egg, like they did in Cincinnati and Baltimore in successive weeks prior to the Turkey Night thrashing of the Cardinals, or like Eagles did two weeks ago, scoring only three points at Washington.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on January 04, 2009, 02:12:54 PM
My impact players:

Dawkins- coming up in the box and stopping Peterson

Jason Avant--keep the chains moving
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 02:22:13 PM
Thank God for Mike Florio.  Without him I wouldn't know that the Eagles might win or lose today.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 02:43:45 PM
Sorry, Andy Reid and playoffs just don't mix.  As others have said multiple times, pass pass pass punt.

Minnesota 21
Eagles 6
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: paco on January 04, 2009, 03:19:43 PM
Quote from: Rome on January 04, 2009, 02:22:13 PM
Thank God for Mike Florio.  Without him I wouldn't know that the Eagles might win or lose today.
All of my football opinions are based off of what Mike Florio tells me to think.


Quote"Atlanta made a major mistake by drafting Matt Ryan." -- Mike Florio
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: BigEd76 on January 04, 2009, 03:24:31 PM
No Pat Williams today  :yay

No LJ either.  Celek gets the start.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Cerevant on January 04, 2009, 03:35:27 PM
Quote from: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 02:43:45 PM
Sorry, Andy Reid and playoffs just don't mix. 
???

Reid has the #2 playoff record of the coaches in the playoffs, and has never lost the first game.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 03:37:07 PM
Quote from: Cerevant on January 04, 2009, 03:35:27 PM
Quote from: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 02:43:45 PM
Sorry, Andy Reid and playoffs just don't mix. 
???

Reid has the #2 playoff record of the coaches in the playoffs, and has never lost the first game.

Just being my usual negative self (at least when it comes to sports), C.  Always hope for the best, expect the worst.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Phanatic on January 04, 2009, 03:52:40 PM
I'm putting aside all the bullshtein from the season and getting pumped for this game.


E A G L E S!!

pumped = lots of alcohol...
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 04, 2009, 04:14:54 PM
farg,,, injury in warmups
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: paco on January 04, 2009, 04:16:31 PM
Love the fox pre game coverage:

"There is an injury report from the pregame warm ups, but first, remeber to text XXX for a sneak peak of the next 24!"  **cut to commercial**
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 04, 2009, 04:17:17 PM
pisses me off.  Reminds me of Hollis getting hurt coming out of the tunnel
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 04:17:39 PM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on January 04, 2009, 04:14:54 PM
farg,,, injury in warmups

I think it was Greg Lewis - which is no big loss
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 04, 2009, 04:18:22 PM
There is a god, greg lewis got hurt
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 04:18:32 PM
LMAO GREG LEWIS HURT HIMSELF IN THE WARMUP

:-D :-D :-D
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Phanatic on January 04, 2009, 04:26:18 PM
That's a positive right?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 04, 2009, 04:29:14 PM
WIN WIN WIN
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: BigEd76 on January 04, 2009, 04:45:59 PM
QuoteLewis, who was carted off the field, won't play today and may very well be out for the rest of the playoffs.

...as he runs down the middle of the field on a deep pass 5 minutes later
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: 4and26 on January 04, 2009, 04:47:16 PM
Nice little drive and a good punt to pin the Vikes
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 04:47:48 PM
I thought they should have gone for it. 4rth and inches...have McNabb sneak it. Keep the drive going.

Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 04:47:56 PM
It would have been a nice little drive if they just didn't squander a second down by throwing deep to Gay Lewis.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 04:55:10 PM
Look at the little guy run!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 04:57:20 PM
Why decline that holding penalty it would have taken the Eagles out of Akers range.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 04:58:23 PM
Nice job of not running on 2nd down.  ::)

McNabb is getting tons of pressure. He has been hit 3 times already and had to do a lil magic trick to escape the last two times.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 04:58:37 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 04, 2009, 04:57:20 PM
Why decline that holding penalty it would have taken the Eagles out of Akers range.

Because Brad Childress is the coach...
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: 4and26 on January 04, 2009, 04:58:52 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 04, 2009, 04:57:20 PM
Why decline that holding penalty it would have taken the Eagles out of Akers range.

That's what we said here to.

I'll take the first points...Birds 3 - Vikes 0
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 04:59:50 PM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 04:58:23 PM
Nice job of not running on 2nd down.  ::)

McNabb is getting tons of pressure. He has been hit 3 times already and had to do a lil magic trick to escape the last two times.

Childress knows Reid's tendancy to pass long so he's bringing the heat and it's working. Reid needs to counter that with quick passes and taking what they'll give him till the D backs off a little.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 04:59:58 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 04, 2009, 04:57:20 PM
Why decline that holding penalty it would have taken the Eagles out of Akers range.

That is what I was thinking. CHILDRESS  :-D :-D :-D
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 05:01:02 PM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 04:59:58 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 04, 2009, 04:57:20 PM
Why decline that holding penalty it would have taken the Eagles out of Akers range.

That is what I was thinking. CHILDRESS  :-D :-D :-D

It's like he coached under Reid or something
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 05:04:15 PM
Peterson got Dawk'd up
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 05:07:05 PM
Mikell should be in the pro bowl.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 05:07:57 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 04, 2009, 05:04:15 PM
Peterson got Dawk'd up

He needs to do that against Taylor.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 05:10:30 PM
Quote from: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 05:07:57 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 04, 2009, 05:04:15 PM
Peterson got Dawk'd up

He needs to do that against Taylor.


There you go
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: 4and26 on January 04, 2009, 05:12:10 PM
Dawk is dishing it out - setting the tone for the D nicely
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 05:14:22 PM
Only good things happen when Buck touches the ball.

So I do not expect him to get another carry all game.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 05:14:27 PM
Buck has deceptive speed
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: 4and26 on January 04, 2009, 05:14:43 PM
Wait ta go buck
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 05:18:35 PM
3rd and short and a crappy call
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 05:18:45 PM
Another great 3rd and 1 call.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 05:19:05 PM
Akers is MVP so far
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 05:19:20 PM
At least Akers is money today.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 05:25:28 PM
Eagles defense needs to begin closing the deal on 3rd downs.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 05:29:27 PM
Looks like Samuel's leg just fell off.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 05:29:46 PM
Quote from: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 05:25:28 PM
Eagles defense needs to begin closing the deal on 3rd downs.

Samuel hurt. Lito in?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 05:29:56 PM
Why are they giving their receivers such a big cushion? Samuel's down. This drive sucks.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 05:30:53 PM
BTW that was a terrible angle Dawkins took on that bomb. He could have had that INT.  :boo
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 05:31:26 PM
That was farging pathetic
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 05:31:30 PM
There goes the great Defense.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 05:33:06 PM
Looks like the garbage play-calling is back on offense.

And great job by the defense on Peterson's touchdown run.   :yay
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 05:36:21 PM
Quote from: Rome on January 04, 2009, 05:33:06 PM
Looks like the garbage play-calling is back on offense.

And great job by the defense on Peterson's touchdown run.   :yay


Yeah I expect 90% pass now.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: 4and26 on January 04, 2009, 05:36:33 PM
Pretty rare a team can hold Peterson down.

Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 05:38:15 PM
Great pass by Donovan to Curtis
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 05:39:06 PM
Andy's airing it out now, forget anything underneath, in the flat, running the ball, screens
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 05:40:35 PM
McNabb's gonna end up throwing it 50 times and will probably throw at least 2 picks the way things are going.  He almost threw pick 1 a second ago.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 05:41:17 PM
Quote from: Rome on January 04, 2009, 05:40:35 PM
McNabb's gonna end up throwing it 50 times and will probably throw at least 2 picks the way things are going.  He almost threw pick 1 a second ago.

That looked like a ideal play to do a double move. Have the corner bite the curl and then go deep.

MADDEN!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 05:42:05 PM
The run has officially been abandoned
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 05:42:46 PM
D Jack = Playmaker
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 05:44:14 PM
We need six here... not three.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 05:44:58 PM
Westbrook just got five ... run the farging ball... or just have donavan roll out.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: 4and26 on January 04, 2009, 05:45:00 PM
Farging 3rd down is killing us today (again) :boom :boom
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 05:45:06 PM
Quote from: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 05:44:14 PM
We need six here... not three.

Redzone offense woes again
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 05:45:34 PM
3rd & 1:  throw it.   FAIL

3rd & 2:  throw it.   FAIL


Awesome game plan.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 05:45:50 PM
Another brilliant play call there.  ::)
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 05:48:15 PM
Samuel's leg apparently re-attached, and he's back in.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 05:48:48 PM
3rd down has been a fail on both sides of the ball.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 05:49:13 PM
ASANTE!!!!!!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 05:49:15 PM
GAME OVER!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 05:49:17 PM
ASANTE SAMEUL MOTHERfargER
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 05:49:24 PM
Big third down here. Let's stop them


GOT IT!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 05:49:29 PM
Quote from: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 05:48:15 PM
Samuel's leg apparently re-attached, and he's back in.

And Ol' One-Leg gets a pick-six.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Father Demon on January 04, 2009, 05:49:38 PM
Asante and his new leg = AWESOME!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 04, 2009, 05:50:54 PM
thats Why they signed Asante
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 05:51:30 PM
Chris Clemons just planted Jackson like a motherfarger.

:-D
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 05:51:42 PM
And Clemons blew up Tavaris hahahahahha
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 05:52:05 PM
Did Jamal Jackson get hurt?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 05:52:33 PM
Must've missed the excessive celebration?????

Regardless they only have it at the 37
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 04, 2009, 05:53:06 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 04, 2009, 05:52:33 PM
Must've missed the excessive celebration?????

Regardless they only have it at the 37
i didnt see it either
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 05:53:45 PM
You didn't see it because there was none.

Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 05:54:33 PM
Sheldon Brown has been the goat today
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 05:55:19 PM
Pretty good coverage.  He's gotta wrap up.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 05:56:19 PM
Defense looks like shtein
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 05:57:14 PM
The Queens already have 100 yards rushing.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 05:57:30 PM
I really do not like our RUN D in this game. They are getting about 5-6 yds a pop. Plus there has been no pass rush.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 05:58:13 PM
Vikings going through the Eagles' D like a hot knife through butter.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 05:59:24 PM
Holding them to a FG here would be big. Hold them and maybe even score 3 themselves.

Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 06:00:17 PM
D needs to get it's 'dawg' back. Lookin at you Dawk
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 04, 2009, 06:00:42 PM
they will score
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 06:02:22 PM
Third down is killing this team.  If we don't start converting them, and stopping them from converting, we will lose.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 06:02:25 PM
They're getting punked pretty badly out there.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: 4and26 on January 04, 2009, 06:03:25 PM
man that's a dejected look bench.....
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 06:05:30 PM
The level of hatred I feel for Joe Buck really can't be measured.  Just thought I'd mention it.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: 4and26 on January 04, 2009, 06:06:49 PM
Dumb call, dumb pass, Dmac isn't Peyton...
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 06:06:59 PM
Eagles tried to be like Manning last night, but we throw a pick.  Another excellent call on 3rd and short.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 06:07:06 PM
Another 3rd & 1 and they throw the ball.

And there's pick #1.

I hate this team.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 06:07:11 PM
Please fire Reid at halftime
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 06:08:07 PM
Reid is being outcoached by Mr. Noodle.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 06:09:00 PM
Hahaha.  Childress just pulled an Andy.

Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 04, 2009, 06:09:04 PM
LF maybe but not Childress. Childress is trying to lose this game.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: 4and26 on January 04, 2009, 06:09:39 PM
Quote from: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 06:08:07 PM
Reid is being outcoached by Mr. Noodle.

Not during that last Minnesota series.

Eagles should never have got the ball back here
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 06:11:52 PM
Absolutely unreal.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 06:13:03 PM
I posted that before Childress gave the Eagles the ball back...

then Reid just throws swing passes to the outside...

Master v Pupil in the battle of the worst coaches in the NFL.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 06:14:04 PM
Horrendous clock management again.

I have never seen a team come so completely unglued with time in short supply.  They had three farging guys on the right side and then throw to Westbrook while he has 20 yards to get to the sideline?

farg Andy Reid and his bullshtein.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 04, 2009, 06:15:29 PM
Andy Reid is trying so badly to lose this game. On the flip side, so is Brad Childress. Hopefully our coach wises up sooner than theirs.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 06:15:57 PM
Quote from: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 06:13:03 PM

Master v Pupil in the battle of the worst coaches in the NFL.

yup, and if anyone wonders why Vikings fans are so pissed off at Childress this game is all they need as evidence. The Eagles coaches are calling a zesty offensive AND defensive game.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Father Demon on January 04, 2009, 06:21:24 PM
Bad feelings.

Yep, bad feelings about the rest of the game.

farging Christ.....
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Don Ho on January 04, 2009, 06:23:02 PM
Birds bench looks like they're down 30-0.  WTF?  

Did someone send a fake memo to Sheldon telling him Plaxico is now playing for the Vikings.  
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Don Ho on January 04, 2009, 06:23:53 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 04, 2009, 06:07:11 PM
Please fire Reid at halftime

Please.  Merry Xmas to us.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Don Ho on January 04, 2009, 06:24:38 PM
Quote from: Rome on January 04, 2009, 06:05:30 PM
The level of hatred I feel for Joe Buck really can't be measured.  Just thought I'd mention it.

Just slightly ahead of my hatred for AR.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Don Ho on January 04, 2009, 06:27:02 PM
one positive, no LJ.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 06:27:53 PM
Kleinsausser 16 yards what the farg is the D doing
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 06:28:58 PM
Turning point of the game right here.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 06:29:21 PM
Quote from: Father Demon on January 04, 2009, 06:21:24 PM
Bad feelings.

Yep, bad feelings about the rest of the game.

farging Christ.....

Yep.  I felt bad at the beginning of the game, and they've done nothing to allay my fears.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 06:29:44 PM
The D is getting shredded by Kleinsausser
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 06:30:32 PM
7 of 11 on third downs.  Flag on the Eagles....

What a season.. We'll lose this game but still have Andy!!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 06:30:36 PM
Time to get their farging asses in gear
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 06:31:12 PM
Luckily for us the Eagles are well known for their ability to make halftime adjusements...
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 06:31:26 PM
Tavaris Jackson is owning this defense right now.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: shorebird on January 04, 2009, 06:31:42 PM
This is a must stop here.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 06:31:47 PM
3rd down again.  So do the Vikings score, or do they have to just settle for a first down?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 06:31:55 PM
Make a farging play you Hoydas
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: shorebird on January 04, 2009, 06:32:23 PM
DAMN, almost a fumble.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 06:32:24 PM
 :o They stopped one!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 06:32:26 PM
Dawk blitz loss of 12
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 06:33:22 PM
That gay farging horn... I want to shove it up Andy Reid's ass.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 06:33:28 PM
Considine with his weekly contribution.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: 4and26 on January 04, 2009, 06:34:30 PM
Time for the offense to do something here............
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 06:34:37 PM
Time for Andy Reid's 4-P Offensive specialty.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Phanatic on January 04, 2009, 06:36:23 PM
Somebody freakishly monitoring CF from their cell phone at the game should distract Andy with a cheese burger so the other coaches can take over and win this game. If this works it should be our plan for all Eagle games.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 06:36:33 PM
Quote from: Rome on January 04, 2009, 06:33:28 PM
Considine with his weekly contribution.


awful call


Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 06:37:34 PM
Avant
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 06:37:43 PM
BIG PLAY!!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: 4and26 on January 04, 2009, 06:38:19 PM
Put Buck in and run the dam ball
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 06:38:57 PM
Celek > LJ
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: shorebird on January 04, 2009, 06:39:04 PM
Celeck is like 10 times the player LJ is.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: shorebird on January 04, 2009, 06:40:32 PM
Westbrook has to get in the mix here.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 06:40:43 PM
wow, the Eagles are modifying their offense and going away from Westbrook and throwing it 20 yards to their mediocre WRs
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 06:41:29 PM
Avant
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 06:43:19 PM
Is it just me or is Jared Allen the least intimidating looking double digit sack DE in league history.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Father Demon on January 04, 2009, 06:44:12 PM
That's some bullshtein right there
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 06:47:14 PM
Time to give up another 45 yards rushing.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 06:48:42 PM
Gocong makes a stop!  :o
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 06:49:40 PM
Great return but why didn't he just run over the punter.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 06:49:49 PM
Eagles' O set up nicely by the defense and DeJax. 

I can't wait to see how Reid fargs it up!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 06:52:46 PM
Way to go, birds
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 06:52:50 PM
Ha.  Knew that was coming.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 06:53:03 PM
hahahahahahahahaha.....
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 06:53:24 PM
Tra Thomas looks like a turnstile against Jared Allen.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 06:53:30 PM
Thomas got beat bad.

Of course running the ball there would have been nice.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 04, 2009, 06:53:38 PM
Goodbye Tra, we ain't re-signing you. Just got owned by the most overrated pass rusher in the history of the game.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 06:54:35 PM
They need to force a turn over to have a chance.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 06:56:35 PM
If Andy calls five more running plays in this game I'll be shocked.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 04, 2009, 06:57:28 PM
LOL at the offense, they farging suck
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 04, 2009, 06:59:11 PM
Gotta get Buck in there. Westbrook has been awful and is clearly gimpy and has no accel.

If Buck was in there would prob me more success running.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 06:59:21 PM
Big 3rd and 5 coming here. A stop here and maybe just maybe the offense puts up 3 pts or milks the clock.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 07:00:25 PM
Quote from: King Cole on January 04, 2009, 06:59:11 PM
Gotta get Buck in there. Westbrook has been awful and is clearly gimpy and has no accel.

If Buck was in there would prob me more success running.

He has not had much since that big run./
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 07:01:44 PM
inside the 5, great, safety and the tie is coming
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 07:02:33 PM
scratch that, got it at the 20, looking forward to driving it to their 40 then farging up
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 07:02:58 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 04, 2009, 07:01:44 PM
inside the 5, great, safety and the tie is coming

Should be.  I think the refs blew that call.  See if Son of Reid challenges that call.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:03:14 PM
The retarded zebras finally got one right.  I was about to throw my shoe through the television.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 07:03:29 PM
They better run here with Buck.  :-D
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 07:03:55 PM
N/m
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 07:04:43 PM
Quote from: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:03:14 PM
The retarded zebras finally got one right.  I was about to throw my shoe through the television.

I think it gets overturned.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:05:12 PM
Hahaha.  Now they reversed it.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:06:15 PM
Westbrook looks like a farging cripple out there.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 07:06:24 PM
Let's not run Buck .
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: bowzer on January 04, 2009, 07:06:53 PM
Avant is the MVP so far.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 07:06:58 PM
Avant
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:07:35 PM
Avant?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:09:06 PM
The white Wes Welker is having a good game too.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:13:04 PM
Almost a disaster.

Again.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Don Ho on January 04, 2009, 07:14:09 PM
Runyan is playing on roller skates.  Terrible.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 07:14:37 PM
McNabb's getting hit a lot.

This team is going to kill me.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Don Ho on January 04, 2009, 07:15:05 PM
Where are the screens?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 07:15:32 PM
So early in the game they were lining up Westbrook as WR and running with Buck.

And it worked. So now we will not see it.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 07:16:18 PM
Maybe the most amazing thing ever is the Eagles are winning this game
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 07:16:34 PM
In approximately 7½ minutes of game time, this season will most likely be officially over.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 07:16:55 PM
Quote from: Don Ho on January 04, 2009, 07:15:05 PM
Where are the screens?

Up Reids fat ass
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Don Ho on January 04, 2009, 07:17:20 PM
fdhtrejcx ktiu ty5ku vytre

SHELDON
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: 4and26 on January 04, 2009, 07:18:15 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 04, 2009, 07:16:55 PM
Quote from: Don Ho on January 04, 2009, 07:15:05 PM
Where are the screens?

Up Reids fat ass

Why has Buck not gotten more carries.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 07:18:20 PM
whoa, D blitzed and actually made a play

Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:18:34 PM
Sheldon's making it hard for me to keep defending him.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 07:19:33 PM
Quote from: 4and26 on January 04, 2009, 07:18:15 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 04, 2009, 07:16:55 PM
Quote from: Don Ho on January 04, 2009, 07:15:05 PM
Where are the screens?

Up Reids fat ass

Why has Buck not gotten more carries.

He's up Reid's fat ass too.


I mean think about this, the Eagles are winning this game right now. Have you ever seen a team perform worse and win a playoff game? It's amazing to think Childress sucks worse than Reid.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Don Ho on January 04, 2009, 07:20:04 PM
Quote from: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:18:34 PM
Sheldon's making it hard for me to keep defending him.

Where's Philly Girl?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: 4and26 on January 04, 2009, 07:20:47 PM
LETS GET SOME POINTS!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:21:31 PM
Screen passes almost never work.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Don Ho on January 04, 2009, 07:21:43 PM
SCREEN!!

farg YEAH!!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: 4and26 on January 04, 2009, 07:21:52 PM
Quote from: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:21:31 PM
Screen passes almost never work.

HA TD ...............
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: NGM on January 04, 2009, 07:22:04 PM
Quote from: Don Ho on January 04, 2009, 07:15:05 PM
Where are the screens?

There it farging is!  Touchdown baby!!!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: BigEd76 on January 04, 2009, 07:22:18 PM
YAC MUTHAFERS
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: 4and26 on January 04, 2009, 07:23:03 PM
Great blocking by the Wideouts!

Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 07:23:13 PM
WESTBROOK!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 07:23:59 PM
Well what do you know
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: shorebird on January 04, 2009, 07:24:11 PM
Just goes to show you, if you keep giving him the ball, eventually he's going to break the big one.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:24:15 PM
D-Jax literally pushed Westbrook into the end zone.

:-D
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 07:25:15 PM
Quote from: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:24:15 PM
D-Jax literally pushed Westbrook into the end zone.

:-D

"No, Brian, you've got to get all the way in.  Believe me, I know!"
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:25:45 PM
MOVE IT OLD MAN!!!!!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Don Ho on January 04, 2009, 07:25:51 PM
SeaBiscuit,

I am about to be admitted to the hospital!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on January 04, 2009, 07:26:05 PM
god damn that was sick
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Phanatic on January 04, 2009, 07:30:40 PM
2nd screen of the game not so much...
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:31:17 PM
Rocca's been absolutely killing it today.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Don Ho on January 04, 2009, 07:33:31 PM
jordon you idiot
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:33:52 PM
Hahaha.  Nice penalty call.  Not too obvious at all there.

Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: BigEd76 on January 04, 2009, 07:35:24 PM
ballgame
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:35:32 PM
JUQUA!!!!!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: 4and26 on January 04, 2009, 07:36:25 PM
OK...everyone breath. :-D
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Phanatic on January 04, 2009, 07:36:39 PM
HA HA! Game Set Match!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 07:37:42 PM
Nice job by Celek to stay in bounds.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:41:26 PM
No field goal attempts here.  Just run the farging ball and either hand it over or the game is over.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Don Ho on January 04, 2009, 07:43:27 PM
Quote from: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:41:26 PM
No field goal attempts here.  Just run the farging ball and either hand it over or the game is over.

I agree.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:44:19 PM
Or not.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Don Ho on January 04, 2009, 07:44:48 PM
Quote from: Don Ho on January 04, 2009, 07:43:27 PM
Quote from: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:41:26 PM
No field goal attempts here.  Just run the farging ball and either hand it over or the game is over.

I agree.

Like I said, I'd go for the FG.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 07:44:54 PM
They don't really deserve to win this game, I mean, minus the INT for a TD and Westbrook's TD and they've sucked ass. This reminds me of the 2006 playoffs. I actually think they'll play better vs. the Giants next week but they won't be as lucky with the big plays.

oh, and Childress sucks worse than Reid and that's saying alot
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 07:45:45 PM
lol at Peterson taking it out at the -9
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:45:59 PM
h8r.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 04, 2009, 07:46:43 PM
Lito sighting.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:48:20 PM
Why do they continue to blow that retarded horn?  It's embarrassing.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 07:48:57 PM
Quote from: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:48:20 PM
Why do they continue to blow that retarded horn?  It's embarrassing.

Its like the Eagles game when they're down by 16 and light fireworks after a FG
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 07:49:38 PM
God I love Dawkins
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:50:45 PM
Dawkins wasn't even trying to hit Berrian yet he still jacked him up.

:-D
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Phanatic on January 04, 2009, 07:52:36 PM
Iggles win but offense was horrid. The D did what they had to do and carried the game.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:53:52 PM
That's actually really encouraging.  The defense was stifling in the second half.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 04, 2009, 07:55:15 PM
Boners all around.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 07:56:29 PM
hey I'm happy because a win is a farging win, but if this team has any plans of getting past the Giants at the Meadowlands it needs to get it's shtein together.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: BigEd76 on January 04, 2009, 07:58:13 PM
that felt like an October game but they're in the final 8.

believe
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:58:36 PM
Season's over.  Time to move on.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 04, 2009, 07:59:16 PM
Quote from: Rome on January 04, 2009, 07:58:36 PM
Season's over.  Time to move on.

This guy!  Who's better than this guy?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: BigEd76 on January 04, 2009, 08:06:44 PM
Reid:

Klecko = bruised shoulder
McGlynn = strained hamstring
Lewis = rolled ankle

everyone else sore but OK.  No idea where Buckhalter went...
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: General_Failure on January 04, 2009, 08:10:21 PM
I thought before the game that if they didn't play their best, but still win, they'd be alright against the Giants, but if they won easily they'd roll over for Eli.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 04, 2009, 08:10:38 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on January 04, 2009, 08:06:44 PM
McGlynn = strained hamstring

This guy's on the active roster, and the team's still in the playoffs and actually won a game.  Wow.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: BigEd76 on January 04, 2009, 08:22:18 PM
Childress:  "whoever bought those last 30,000 tickets....this place got loud...Seattle loud"

wtf
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 04, 2009, 08:38:37 PM
Childress should take a cue from Andy and not say anything at all.  Cough cough.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on January 04, 2009, 08:46:56 PM
all this talk about getting a TE, I think Celek just made that point moot in this game

He might not be the Witten type TE we are all looking for that effectively blocks and catches on a consistent basis, but he is about as sure-handed as it gets when it comes to picking up yards and making big plays.

Hes about as good as Jason Avant when the ball is thrown his way, and you really cant ask for much more than that

Great game.

Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 04, 2009, 08:54:25 PM
Jason Avant was a stud.

The OL was the goat today. They could not give McNabb much time at all. And the coaching staff plays into that too because they were letting 5 get hit a lot. No chipping on Allen...let let Celek try to man him up once.

Defense was solid. They did their job despite not really getting much pressure. I expected Jackson to run more than he did.

They are going to beat NY.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 04, 2009, 09:00:43 PM
Quote from: Don Ho on January 04, 2009, 07:15:05 PM
Where are the screens?
i think they found one :)
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 04, 2009, 09:03:09 PM
Quote from: Don Ho on January 04, 2009, 07:25:51 PM
SeaBiscuit,

I am about to be admitted to the hospital!
you'll know where to go
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 09:11:30 PM
Quote from: Phanatic on January 04, 2009, 07:52:36 PM
Iggles win but offense was horrid. The D did what they had to do and carried the game.

The red zone woes really came back to hurt them again.

They can not have drives stalled like that. Its simple stop throwing on 3rd and 1. Line up Westbrook as a WR, Buck as RB, and Eckel as FB and run that ball no matter what.

Every time something bad happened it was on a 3rd and very short where they decided to pass.

Avant came up big. And McNabb was huge. They had no running game either by design or because of the Vikings D, and there were many times they had the ball deep in their own territory and McNabb almost always drove them out to at least midfield because botching up a 3rd down play.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 09:12:59 PM
Akers was money today.  So was Rocca.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 04, 2009, 09:14:38 PM
Quote from: reese125 on January 04, 2009, 08:46:56 PM
all this talk about getting a TE, I think Celek just made that point moot in this game

He might not be the Witten type TE we are all looking for that effectively blocks and catches on a consistent basis, but he is about as sure-handed as it gets when it comes to picking up yards and making big plays.

Hes about as good as Jason Avant when the ball is thrown his way, and you really cant ask for much more than that

Great game.



Celek is Chad Lewis which is fine because he gets 9 yards every time he catches the ball unlike LJ who drops it but is good for an occasional big play once every 4 games
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: rjs246 on January 04, 2009, 09:24:24 PM
Celek and Avant are the same player. Big white dudes who catch everything and fall back towards the line of scrimmage after they secure the ball. Yards after the catch is not an option for either of them.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 09:25:37 PM
Big white dudes!
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on January 04, 2009, 09:26:19 PM
has there been a worse playoff win ever
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 09:28:36 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 04, 2009, 09:26:19 PM
has there been a worse playoff win ever

Yeah the one against the Packers with the 4rth and 26 play.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: phattymatty on January 04, 2009, 09:29:05 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 04, 2009, 09:24:24 PM
Big white dudes

ha.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 09:29:35 PM
Avant is solid. Celek is solid. Even Curtis is solid when playing against a soft coverage. They still need that one guy...since they still refuse to run the ball.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: rjs246 on January 04, 2009, 09:30:03 PM
Avant went to Michigan.

White.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on January 04, 2009, 09:33:46 PM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 09:28:36 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 04, 2009, 09:26:19 PM
has there been a worse playoff win ever

Yeah the one against the Packers with the 4rth and 26 play.

not even close
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 09:36:45 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 04, 2009, 09:33:46 PM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 09:28:36 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 04, 2009, 09:26:19 PM
has there been a worse playoff win ever

Yeah the one against the Packers with the 4rth and 26 play.

not even close

Sherman gave that game to the Eagles like 3 times.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: DH on January 04, 2009, 09:38:33 PM
some of you people farging amaze me. its like they need to play a perfect game for you all to be happy.

they won. they probably shouldnt even be playing right now but they are, and they are one of the final 8 teams with a chance at winning it all - and some of you cant even enjoy it.

whatever, carry on.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on January 04, 2009, 09:40:08 PM
they looked horrible today against a team that had no business being in an nfl playoff game....if that makes you proud then so be it...some of us expect things like championships
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: rjs246 on January 04, 2009, 09:40:32 PM
Who's not enjoying it? Everyone is enjoying it. I'm just not ready to jerk everyone off over it.

Jerking everyone off will happen a few weeks from now. Get in line, fellas.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 04, 2009, 09:41:06 PM
I enjoyed the win.  Doesn't mean I can't be critical of the way they played, especially on offense.  They shtein the bed repeatedly today and will get waxed by a team that doesn't have a complete dumb ass for a head coach.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: General_Failure on January 04, 2009, 09:41:40 PM
A team that had no business being in an NFL playoff game played horribly and won against a team that had no business being in an NFL playoff game after plowing a team that was expected to make a superbowl run.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 04, 2009, 09:44:55 PM
Quote from: Die-Hard on January 04, 2009, 09:38:33 PM
some of you people farging amaze me. its like they need to play a perfect game for you all to be happy.

they won. they probably shouldnt even be playing right now but they are, and they are one of the final 8 teams with a chance at winning it all - and some of you cant even enjoy it.

whatever, carry on.

Dude this is CF.

Don't worry I am pretty pumped up by the win and now will talk crap with the Giants fans at work even though I know better.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: DH on January 04, 2009, 09:45:49 PM
how can you say you "expect" a championship when you've repeatedly said they have no shot against the giants? seems a bit contradictory to me...
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on January 04, 2009, 09:49:00 PM
we expect championships in general not necesarily this year....no one thinks they have a shot at a title right now and thats the problem
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: MDS on January 04, 2009, 09:54:42 PM
so i watched the game in this sports bar in montreal. had more hds than ive seen at any bar in the states. but it had more frogs than i ever want to see.

a win is a win in the playoffs. no they didnt look good, but they move on. thats what counts.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: rjs246 on January 04, 2009, 10:04:55 PM
Montreal strippers (and women in general) = the win.
Watching NFL Playoff games in a bar in Montreal = the lose.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: MDS on January 04, 2009, 10:17:29 PM
my buddy up here doesnt have a tv, so what choice do i have
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on January 04, 2009, 10:20:31 PM
Quote from: Rome on January 04, 2009, 09:41:06 PM
I enjoyed the win.  Doesn't mean I can't be critical of the way they played, especially on offense.  They shtein the bed repeatedly today and will get waxed by a team that doesn't have a complete dumb ass for a head coach.

I wasnt seeing things was I when Childress declined the holding penalty to bring up 4th down for the Eagles, and the Eagles still kicked the FG?

coaching at its finest
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: rjs246 on January 04, 2009, 10:24:03 PM
That call made absolutely no sense unless you factor in the fact that no one on earth has any faith in Akers from beyond 40 yards.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 04, 2009, 10:35:11 PM
Quote from: MDS on January 04, 2009, 10:17:29 PM
my buddy up here doesnt have a tv, so what choice do i have
they have joos in canada?

Clemmons is a manbearpig
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: rjs246 on January 04, 2009, 10:42:33 PM
Polygamy as a religious standard? Who wouldn't give thanks?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: General_Failure on January 04, 2009, 10:43:14 PM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on January 04, 2009, 10:35:11 PM
Quote from: MDS on January 04, 2009, 10:17:29 PM
my buddy up here doesnt have a tv, so what choice do i have
they have joos in canada?

Yes. Sometimes they do comedy.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 04, 2009, 11:15:07 PM
The thrill of victory.

And the agony of reading about it on  :CF

Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Eagles_Legendz on January 04, 2009, 11:32:43 PM
Akers has been money the second half of this season.  The 51 yard field goal would have been good from 60 and all of them were right down the middle.  I thought he was finished this season but he has proven me wrong, thankfully.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: stalker on January 05, 2009, 12:10:57 AM
Quote from: General_Failure on January 04, 2009, 09:41:40 PM
A team that had no business being in an NFL playoff game played horribly and won against a team that had no business being in an NFL playoff game after plowing a team that was expected to make a superbowl run.

Huh?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 05, 2009, 12:19:47 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 04, 2009, 09:40:08 PM
they looked horrible today against a team that had no business being in an nfl playoff game....if that makes you proud then so be it...some of us expect things like championships

The Phils couldn't drive in a run to save their lives against Tampa in the World Series early on, but still won the damn thing. Who cares about ugly, just win. You can catch fire at any time.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Don Ho on January 05, 2009, 05:18:35 AM
Quote from: reese125 on January 04, 2009, 10:20:31 PM
Quote from: Rome on January 04, 2009, 09:41:06 PM
I enjoyed the win.  Doesn't mean I can't be critical of the way they played, especially on offense.  They shtein the bed repeatedly today and will get waxed by a team that doesn't have a complete dumb ass for a head coach.

I wasnt seeing things was I when Childress declined the holding penalty to bring up 4th down for the Eagles, and the Eagles still kicked the FG?

coaching at its finest

I didn't see or follow many Viking games this season but I had heard what a putz Childress was but thought it was isolated to his clock management.  I learned a lot today.  That was just ridiculous when he declined that penalty.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Feva on January 05, 2009, 06:43:52 AM
It was the most beautiful, ugly playoff WIN I've seen in a while from the Eagles.

I couldn't give two shteins about how it happened.  They could've won 3-2 and I'd still be over the moon because they get a chance to play again next week and correct the mistakes.  There are 24 other teams that would kill to be where the Eagles are right now so it's all motherfargin good.

I don't know why folks expected them to just blow by the Vikings... because they stop the run so well... the Vikings are tailor made to force the Eagles into the pass, pass, pass, punt we all know and love so well and they did just that.  That style of offense has lost games against the Bears, the Skins twice and tied the Bengals.  Yesterday, it got them a playoff win.

They'll play better against the Giants.  It's on.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: MadMarchHare on January 05, 2009, 07:17:58 AM
Wait, weren't they near the bottom of the league in pass defence?  And they lost Sharper in the first quarter.

I'd say they were a perfect setup for the Eagles to be successful.  They could get away with passing all the time, and Reid could justify it in his presser.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: phillymic2000 on January 05, 2009, 07:26:26 AM
What a great trip, tons of eagle fans, and the host vikings fans were pretty cool tailgating. Stinkin cold, -1 at noon, never had my beer freeze up while I was holding it.

The only issue I had was a jagoff fan who didn't like people standing, she got security, he told us to sit down we did. Then 5 min later he came back and kicked a viking fan out for standing  :-D. During halftime I talked to the guard and pleaded my case, sure enough she did it again. The guard escorted me down 14 rows and sat me right next to him, that was cool.

THe westbrook run deflated that place, and set off thecelebration for all the eagle fans in attendance. The locals didn't undeerstand why there were fans in dresses and umbrella's, I did my best to tell them why, but I still don't think they got it.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: paco on January 05, 2009, 07:32:42 AM
(http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w34/jnault123/chokeslam.gif)

Fap. Fap. Fap. Fap. Fap.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Feva on January 05, 2009, 07:48:17 AM
Quote from: MadMarchHare on January 05, 2009, 07:17:58 AM
Wait, weren't they near the bottom of the league in pass defence?  And they lost Sharper in the first quarter.

I'd say they were a perfect setup for the Eagles to be successful.  They could get away with passing all the time, and Reid could justify it in his presser.

They finished like 18th or 19th against the pass.  My point is that the Eagles haven't been succcessful this season playing pass, pass, pass... even though Reid won't admit it.  The Bengals were 25th against the pass when we played them.  Even in playing that predictable, largely ineffective style of offense yesterday... they still got the win.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Feva on January 05, 2009, 07:49:03 AM
Quote from: paco on January 05, 2009, 07:32:42 AM
(http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w34/jnault123/chokeslam.gif)

Fap. Fap. Fap. Fap. Fap.

Chokeslam.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: paco on January 05, 2009, 08:27:51 AM
Quote from: EagleFeva on January 05, 2009, 07:49:03 AM
Quote from: paco on January 05, 2009, 07:32:42 AM
(http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w34/jnault123/chokeslam.gif)

Fap. Fap. Fap. Fap. Fap.

Chokeslam.

Times like this I wish Jim Ross announced NFL games.

"Rock Bottom!  Rock Bottom!  Oh my gawd!"
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 05, 2009, 08:44:44 AM
She went and got security over people standing?

Wow.  That's beyond lame.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on January 05, 2009, 08:47:48 AM
Quote from: EagleFeva on January 05, 2009, 07:48:17 AM
Quote from: MadMarchHare on January 05, 2009, 07:17:58 AM
Wait, weren't they near the bottom of the league in pass defence?  And they lost Sharper in the first quarter.

I'd say they were a perfect setup for the Eagles to be successful.  They could get away with passing all the time, and Reid could justify it in his presser.

They finished like 18th or 19th against the pass.  My point is that the Eagles haven't been succcessful this season playing pass, pass, pass... even though Reid won't admit it.  The Bengals were 25th against the pass when we played them.  Even in playing that predictable, largely ineffective style of offense yesterday... they still got the win.

and I dont know about you..but when I kept seeing the Birds run with the clock winding down I was getting a little pissed.

as much as we all scream for them to run, it was not methodical to think you can run against this defense. Nobody on our side of the ball was going to wear any Vikings defensive players down. The Eagles were getting nowhere moving a yard at a time, taking a big chance giving the ball back to the Vikings...so they needed to pass and they did

this was the game where they needed to pass much mor,e and should of been in the game plan right from the gip
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: rjs246 on January 05, 2009, 08:55:53 AM
Quote from: Rome on January 05, 2009, 08:44:44 AM
She went and got security over people standing?

Wow.  That's beyond lame.

Sounds a lot like the people in SunMo's section of the Linc. And no, I will never let that go.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on January 05, 2009, 08:57:06 AM
Quote from: reese125 on January 05, 2009, 08:47:48 AM
Quote from: EagleFeva on January 05, 2009, 07:48:17 AM
Quote from: MadMarchHare on January 05, 2009, 07:17:58 AM
Wait, weren't they near the bottom of the league in pass defence?  And they lost Sharper in the first quarter.

I'd say they were a perfect setup for the Eagles to be successful.  They could get away with passing all the time, and Reid could justify it in his presser.

They finished like 18th or 19th against the pass.  My point is that the Eagles haven't been succcessful this season playing pass, pass, pass... even though Reid won't admit it.  The Bengals were 25th against the pass when we played them.  Even in playing that predictable, largely ineffective style of offense yesterday... they still got the win.

and I dont know about you..but when I kept seeing the Birds run with the clock winding down I was getting a little pissed.

as much as we all scream for them to run, it was not methodical to think you can run against this defense. Nobody on our side of the ball was going to wear any Vikings defensive players down. The Eagles were getting nowhere moving a yard at a time, taking a big chance giving the ball back to the Vikings...so they needed to pass and they did

this was the game where they needed to pass much mor,e and should of been in the game plan right from the gip



when playing against a team with no offense who is no threat to put pts on the board on the road in a very loud dome you dont want to pass and risk sacks fumbles ints ect which is the only way the vikes were gonna score

run clock play defense and get the hell out of there
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: rjs246 on January 05, 2009, 08:58:34 AM
Quote from: reese125 on January 05, 2009, 08:47:48 AM
Quote from: EagleFeva on January 05, 2009, 07:48:17 AM
Quote from: MadMarchHare on January 05, 2009, 07:17:58 AM
Wait, weren't they near the bottom of the league in pass defence?  And they lost Sharper in the first quarter.

I'd say they were a perfect setup for the Eagles to be successful.  They could get away with passing all the time, and Reid could justify it in his presser.

They finished like 18th or 19th against the pass.  My point is that the Eagles haven't been succcessful this season playing pass, pass, pass... even though Reid won't admit it.  The Bengals were 25th against the pass when we played them.  Even in playing that predictable, largely ineffective style of offense yesterday... they still got the win.

and I dont know about you..but when I kept seeing the Birds run with the clock winding down I was getting a little pissed.

as much as we all scream for them to run, it was not methodical to think you can run against this defense. Nobody on our side of the ball was going to wear any Vikings defensive players down. The Eagles were getting nowhere moving a yard at a time, taking a big chance giving the ball back to the Vikings...so they needed to pass and they did

this was the game where they needed to pass much mor,e and should of been in the game plan right from the gip

This is insanity. Those 0, 1 and 2 yard runs were the reason that Minnesota didn't have any time for a comeback. They essentially sealed the game. Every one of those seemingly fruitless plays took 35+ seconds off of the clock and took away any chance of a Minn comeback. Don't be an idiot.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on January 05, 2009, 09:12:43 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 05, 2009, 08:58:34 AM
Quote from: reese125 on January 05, 2009, 08:47:48 AM
Quote from: EagleFeva on January 05, 2009, 07:48:17 AM
Quote from: MadMarchHare on January 05, 2009, 07:17:58 AM
Wait, weren't they near the bottom of the league in pass defence?  And they lost Sharper in the first quarter.

I'd say they were a perfect setup for the Eagles to be successful.  They could get away with passing all the time, and Reid could justify it in his presser.

They finished like 18th or 19th against the pass.  My point is that the Eagles haven't been succcessful this season playing pass, pass, pass... even though Reid won't admit it.  The Bengals were 25th against the pass when we played them.  Even in playing that predictable, largely ineffective style of offense yesterday... they still got the win.

and I dont know about you..but when I kept seeing the Birds run with the clock winding down I was getting a little pissed.

as much as we all scream for them to run, it was not methodical to think you can run against this defense. Nobody on our side of the ball was going to wear any Vikings defensive players down. The Eagles were getting nowhere moving a yard at a time, taking a big chance giving the ball back to the Vikings...so they needed to pass and they did

this was the game where they needed to pass much mor,e and should of been in the game plan right from the gip

This is insanity. Those 0, 1 and 2 yard runs were the reason that Minnesota didn't have any time for a comeback. They essentially sealed the game. Every one of those seemingly fruitless plays took 35+ seconds off of the clock and took away any chance of a Minn comeback. Don't be an idiot.

no slick..Im talking about in the beginning to mid 4th when it looked like they were about to give the ball away AGAIN, running into brick walls every play

Unless you were beating off in the shower, did you see how effective McNabb was in the shotgun and how they were marching down the field? They needed points in a big way.

You have a much better efficiency passing on the Vikings--thats how teams won games against them this year...and the Birds were very close giving it away..so you my friend..dont be an idiot
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Feva on January 05, 2009, 09:17:06 AM
Quote from: reese125 on January 05, 2009, 09:12:43 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 05, 2009, 08:58:34 AM
Quote from: reese125 on January 05, 2009, 08:47:48 AM
Quote from: EagleFeva on January 05, 2009, 07:48:17 AM
Quote from: MadMarchHare on January 05, 2009, 07:17:58 AM
Wait, weren't they near the bottom of the league in pass defence?  And they lost Sharper in the first quarter.

I'd say they were a perfect setup for the Eagles to be successful.  They could get away with passing all the time, and Reid could justify it in his presser.

They finished like 18th or 19th against the pass.  My point is that the Eagles haven't been succcessful this season playing pass, pass, pass... even though Reid won't admit it.  The Bengals were 25th against the pass when we played them.  Even in playing that predictable, largely ineffective style of offense yesterday... they still got the win.

and I dont know about you..but when I kept seeing the Birds run with the clock winding down I was getting a little pissed.

as much as we all scream for them to run, it was not methodical to think you can run against this defense. Nobody on our side of the ball was going to wear any Vikings defensive players down. The Eagles were getting nowhere moving a yard at a time, taking a big chance giving the ball back to the Vikings...so they needed to pass and they did

this was the game where they needed to pass much mor,e and should of been in the game plan right from the gip

This is insanity. Those 0, 1 and 2 yard runs were the reason that Minnesota didn't have any time for a comeback. They essentially sealed the game. Every one of those seemingly fruitless plays took 35+ seconds off of the clock and took away any chance of a Minn comeback. Don't be an idiot.

no slick..Im talking about in the beginning to mid 4th when it looked like they were about to give the ball away AGAIN, running into brick walls every play

Unless you were beating off in the shower, did you see how effective McNabb was in the shotgun and how they were marching down the field? They needed points in a big way.

You have a much better efficiency passing on the Vikings--thats how teams won games against them this year...and the Birds were very close giving it away..so you my friend..dont be an idiot

No.  Those runs throughout the game were absolutely neccessary, no matter how many yards they picked up.  They kept the run a threat... and prevented the Vikings from simply pinning their ears back and coming after McNabb... which like IGY said, could've lead to sacks, fumbles, INT's.. even more so than it actually did.  Not to mention, it shortened the game and kept Peterson on the sidelines.

Even if it's not getting anywhere... you've got to keep the run in the back of the minds of the defense to keep that pass rush honest.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: rjs246 on January 05, 2009, 09:17:57 AM
Clown, they were winning and taking time off of the clock. Everyone wanted them to score again to get a bigger lead, but running the ball into that brick wall contributed directly to their success.

And of course, as IGY and Feva said, no threat of a run games means that Jared Allen eats McNabb's lunch all goddamned game. Please stop posting.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 05, 2009, 09:19:54 AM
I enjoyed watching Minnesota's defense jump up and down and act like jackasses whenever they stopped the run only to look pretty much ridiculous whenever McNabb dropped back and hit 8-10 yard passes over the middle to Celek for first downs.

The screen pass was an absolute thing of beauty, though.  They were completely caught off-guard and the reason they were is because they were bunched up in the box defending the run.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: rjs246 on January 05, 2009, 09:21:56 AM
Quote from: Rome on January 05, 2009, 09:19:54 AM
The screen pass was an absolute thing of beauty, though.  They were completely caught off-guard and the reason they were is because they were bunched up in the box defending the run.

How is that possible? reese told me that the run wasn't accomplishing anything. I'm so confused.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on January 05, 2009, 09:23:09 AM
youre clueless reece

the vikings were absolutely anemic on offense...why would you want to stop the clock by passing and more importantly as i said call a higher risk play and possibly turn the ball over on a jared allen sack fumble or an interception...which was the ONLY way they were gonna score

this is all especially true after the westbrook td when they were up two scores
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 05, 2009, 09:23:14 AM
the blocking on that screen was unbelievable.  Avant/Djack/Curtis took their men, Nick Cole blew up two different players
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 05, 2009, 09:28:08 AM
I doubt I'll remember much from yesterday's game but I'll never forget Jackson running alongside Westbrook and then pushing his ass into the end zone.

Also - it's funny how both Samuel & Jackson had such a huge effect on the game yesterday.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on January 05, 2009, 09:32:30 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 05, 2009, 09:21:56 AM
Quote from: Rome on January 05, 2009, 09:19:54 AM
The screen pass was an absolute thing of beauty, though.  They were completely caught off-guard and the reason they were is because they were bunched up in the box defending the run.

How is that possible? reese told me that the run wasn't accomplishing anything. I'm so confused.

I love it

You and IGY were so content on giving the ball back on their 40 and 50 yard line because A Peterson sucks so bad he cant break one at any time to set them up for a FG to take the lead? They were not using clock management with a 2 pt lead in the beg of the 4th..they were failing miserably

The Eagles were lucky as shtein to win that game and had they lost you and your boy toy would of been on here screaming for pass because thats how they were Jason Avant/Celek moving the chains and the Eagles couldnt run for jack shtein all game

save the idiot talk kid--youre impressing nobody
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: rjs246 on January 05, 2009, 09:33:46 AM
True. I'm always screaming for the Eagles to pass the ball. You're very perceptive.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Diomedes on January 05, 2009, 09:35:22 AM
I'd like to ask Brad Childress what he was thinking when he declined the holding call on third down with the Eagles in FG range.  I suppose he didn't trust his D to prevent the long conversion?  That's some lousy thinking right there.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 05, 2009, 09:35:55 AM
I think reese is missing the point here.  Yes, the Eagles didn't run the ball well at all.  But they kept handing it off anyway just to keep the defense honest.

Hats off to tubby & tubby jr. for sticking with it especially considering how woeful it was.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: rjs246 on January 05, 2009, 09:40:00 AM
Quote from: Diomedes on January 05, 2009, 09:35:22 AM
I'd like to ask Brad Childress what he was thinking when he declined the holding call on third down with the Eagles in FG range.  I suppose he didn't trust his D to prevent the long conversion?  That's some lousy thinking right there.

He felt bad for Andy and all of the mean things people say about him. Wanted to help his old buddy out a little bit.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Diomedes on January 05, 2009, 09:42:05 AM
I didn't follow any of the post game pressers.  Was he grilled on that point?  Did he give a reasoning?

Their prolonged hug and delicate whispers after the game was disgusting.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: phillymic2000 on January 05, 2009, 09:44:08 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 05, 2009, 08:55:53 AM
Quote from: Rome on January 05, 2009, 08:44:44 AM
She went and got security over people standing?

Wow.  That's beyond lame.

Sounds a lot like the people in SunMo's section of the Linc. And no, I will never let that go.

It was just retarded, even the vike fans started yelling at her to knock it off, but it got me better seats so she can kiss it.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 05, 2009, 09:57:28 AM
Quote from: Diomedes on January 05, 2009, 09:42:05 AM
Their prolonged hug and delicate whispers after the game was disgusting.

You were touched, admit it.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 05, 2009, 10:04:08 AM
Quote from: Diomedes on January 05, 2009, 09:42:05 AM
I didn't follow any of the post game pressers.  Was he grilled on that point?  Did he give a reasoning?

Their prolonged hug and delicate whispers after the game was disgusting.
B Rad said that his Special Teams coach told him he would hit it even from 10 yards more, so rather than risk westbrook or jackson making a huge play, he decided on just giving up the 3 pts

I still cant believe he declined it
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 05, 2009, 10:05:16 AM
Ha I just remembered how Desean was taunting Brad Childress.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on January 05, 2009, 10:12:19 AM
Quote from: reese125 on January 05, 2009, 09:32:30 AM
You and IGY were so content on giving the ball back on their 40 and 50 yard line because A Peterson sucks so bad he cant break one at any time to set them up for a FG to take the lead? They were not using clock management with a 2 pt lead in the beg of the 4th..they were failing miserably

The Eagles were lucky as shtein to win that game and had they lost you and your boy toy would of been on here screaming for pass because thats how they were Jason Avant/Celek moving the chains and the Eagles couldnt run for jack shtein all game

with the 2 pt lead in the 4th they passed the ball six times and ran it three...you wanted more passing than that?

after the westbrook score with a two score lead they ran six times and passed two...they for once played it exactly as they should have...im starting to wonder if you even watched the game

and you saying that i would have complained about not passing the ball enough is one of the most uninformed statements ever

Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on January 05, 2009, 10:13:33 AM
yeah thats great...youre 2 hrs late

grab a juice box and sit over there in the corner
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: mussa on January 05, 2009, 10:50:04 AM
Birds did not deserve that game on paper. They D did a decent job. The offense really never got anything going. They never committed to the run. Next week they better bring their A game, because the Giants won't let them stick around.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 05, 2009, 10:53:25 AM
Mcnabb really had a quiet 300 yd game. 
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Wingspan on January 05, 2009, 11:07:53 AM
This thread is absolutely hysterical. You sure the birds won yesterday?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 05, 2009, 11:10:53 AM
Quote from: paco on January 05, 2009, 07:32:42 AM
(http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w34/jnault123/chokeslam.gif)

Fap. Fap. Fap. Fap. Fap.

Two straight weeks with Clemons destroying an offensive player on a defensive return.

Quote from: Wingspan on January 05, 2009, 11:07:53 AM
This thread is absolutely hysterical. You sure the birds won yesterday?

Hell, I'm not even sure they played yesterday.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: mussa on January 05, 2009, 11:12:48 AM
is there a larger .gif of that clemons slam anywhere?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on January 05, 2009, 11:15:12 AM
QuoteTwo straight weeks with Clemons destroying an offensive player on a defensive return.

minus the pie though...that hurts
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 05, 2009, 11:26:22 AM
Quote from: Rome on January 05, 2009, 09:19:54 AM
I enjoyed watching Minnesota's defense jump up and down and act like jackasses whenever they stopped the run only to look pretty much ridiculous whenever McNabb dropped back and hit 8-10 yard passes over the middle to Celek for first downs.

The screen pass was an absolute thing of beauty, though.  They were completely caught off-guard and the reason they were is because they were bunched up in the box defending the run.

Me too.

The two hicks at DE, Allen and Robison, were celebrating everything.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on January 05, 2009, 11:34:48 AM
funny thing is that the minnesota def wasnt even up in the box for that play. the defenders were playing off-man, except for the slot while the LBs dropped back into a zone coverage when the ball was snapped.... which makes the play even more impressive because of downfield blocking

love the heads up by Jackson to get in front of Benny Sapp



Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on January 05, 2009, 12:48:22 PM
they wouldnt be "up in the box" because the eagles went three wide forcing the vikings to spread out which is exactly what they wanted to happen so they could get westbrook in space
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on January 05, 2009, 12:54:36 PM
I dont know if youre piggy-backing my comment, but my remarks were based off of Romes previous assumption that Minny's defense was playing "in the box".
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: stalker on January 05, 2009, 12:56:19 PM
I assume Reeses is not fan of "playing in the box".
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on January 05, 2009, 01:05:44 PM
another thing of note that probably was brought up in this thread during the game but was anyone else wondering why the hell westbrook was in the game on that last posession
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: stalker on January 05, 2009, 01:06:54 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 05, 2009, 01:05:44 PM
another thing of note that probably was brought up in this thread during the game but was anyone else wondering why the hell westbrook was in the game on that last posession

Yeah.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: General_Failure on January 05, 2009, 01:08:04 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 05, 2009, 01:05:44 PM
another thing of note that probably was brought up in this thread during the game but was anyone else wondering why the hell westbrook was in the game on that last posession

They're resting Eckel for the superbowl.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on January 05, 2009, 01:08:24 PM
Quote from: stalker on January 05, 2009, 12:56:19 PM
I assume Reeses is not fan of "playing in the box".

ask your girlfriend
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: rjs246 on January 05, 2009, 01:09:20 PM
Retard fight.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 05, 2009, 01:24:35 PM
Why does Reid keep saying McNabb "managed" the game well?

I have noticed it for the past few weeks. Is there something going on where this is a subtle hint?

Ms Cleo please your abilities to read into everything and explain that one.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: phattymatty on January 05, 2009, 01:53:51 PM
Anyone see that retard in the front row holding the sign yesterday?  "Eagles Wins"

And underneath it said something like "Wife goes to Tampa".

Like we need any reinforcement of the dumb stereotype. 

Even though I have no idea what he meant, I laughed. 
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 05, 2009, 01:55:03 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on January 05, 2009, 01:53:51 PM
Anyone see that retard in the front row holding the sign yesterday?  "Eagles Wins"

And underneath it said something like "Wife goes to Tampa".

Like we need any reinforcement of the dumb stereotype. 

Even though I have no idea what he meant, I laughed. 

I noticed that also.  The Super Bowl's in Tampa this year, right?
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: phillymic2000 on January 05, 2009, 03:25:55 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on January 05, 2009, 01:53:51 PM
Anyone see that retard in the front row holding the sign yesterday?  "Eagles Wins"

And underneath it said something like "Wife goes to Tampa".

Like we need any reinforcement of the dumb stereotype. 

Even though I have no idea what he meant, I laughed. 

I laughed at a couple eagle fans yesterday, at least shoulderpad shawn wasn't there. Some people are just stooooopid.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: phattymatty on January 05, 2009, 03:30:35 PM
(http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/deadspin/2009/01/eaglessign.jpg)
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on January 05, 2009, 03:40:37 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on January 05, 2009, 03:30:35 PM
(http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/deadspin/2009/01/eaglessign.jpg)

#42 Vikings fan: "Hey guys--you want to explain what the farg that means?"
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Diomedes on January 05, 2009, 03:45:05 PM
You'd think Ty Detmer could grow a beard for the game even if he can't make a good sign.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: stalker on January 05, 2009, 04:08:10 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on January 05, 2009, 03:45:05 PM
You'd think Ty Detmer could grow a beard for the game even if he can't make a good sign.

It looks bad because he can only grow it on his neck.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 05, 2009, 05:15:35 PM
Did you all notice Eskin in just about every shot of Reid on the sidelines? Show Reid; Eskin was always over his shoulder.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 05, 2009, 05:15:51 PM
BURRELL SIGNS
WIFE GOES TO TAMPA
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: shorebird on January 05, 2009, 07:40:39 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on January 05, 2009, 03:30:35 PM
(http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/deadspin/2009/01/eaglessign.jpg)

LOL!!.............I had forgotten that I was at the game.

By the way, that looks to be one Phat TV there Phatty.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: shorebird on January 05, 2009, 07:46:08 PM
Quote from: shorebird on December 29, 2008, 05:49:07 PM
Screen passes.

Uhhhh, uhyaeyass!

Quote from: EagleFeva on January 05, 2009, 09:17:06 AM
Those runs throughout the game were absolutely neccessary, no matter how many yards they picked up.  They kept the run a threat... and prevented the Vikings from simply pinning their ears back and coming after McNabb... which like IGY said, could've lead to sacks, fumbles, INT's.. even more so than it actually did.  Not to mention, it shortened the game and kept Peterson on the sidelines.

Even if it's not getting anywhere... you've got to keep the run in the back of the minds of the defense to keep that pass rush honest.

Uhyaeyass againass.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: NC_Eagle on January 05, 2009, 08:05:15 PM
Didn't get to post this weekend because of computer problems, but WOW good overall game!  The Eagles sticking to a game plan in a close game and winning in the end? That's UNPOSSIBLE!

I say it's the beard!  :paranoid

Did the down-field blocking on Westy's TD reception remind anyone else of the Walsh/Siefert era 49ers? (well, a little anyway)
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: MadMarchHare on January 05, 2009, 08:14:18 PM
It's only possible against the pupil (BTW, did anyone see this from Bill Simmons on Friday?)

Quote** Philly's Andy Reid will be battling former assistant Brad Childress on Sunday in a matchup Peter King described as "teacher vs. pupil." Teacher versus pupil???? That explains everything! Do you think Reid tutored Childress in classes like "Screwing Up a Two-Minute Drill," "Hanging Your QB Out to Dry," "Dumb and Possibly Damaging Field-Goal Attempts," "Idiotic Short-Yardage Calls," "Special Teams Collapses," "How To Blow Your Challenges," "Leaving Yourself With No Timeouts" and "How To Remain Calm As You're Getting Booed By Your Own Fans"?

Bill Simmons kills me.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: Rome on January 05, 2009, 08:25:29 PM
Quote from: reese125 on January 05, 2009, 12:54:36 PM
I dont know if youre piggy-backing my comment, but my remarks were based off of Romes previous assumption that Minny's defense was playing "in the box".

Four defensive linemen, two linebackers playing up close behind the line and another cornerback playing tight on the line of scrimmage opposite Avant.  That's not exactly playing a prevent, reese.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 06, 2009, 11:32:16 AM
QuoteFREROTTE THINKS HE GAVE VIKINGS "BEST CHANCE TO WIN"
Posted by Mike Florio on January 6, 2009, 10:28 a.m.

So despite declaring in September that Gus Frerotte would be the Vikings' starting quarterback for the rest of the year, coach Brad Childress decided after Frerotte was injured late in the year that the team would ride Tarvaris until the conclusion of the season.

Per Michael Silver of Yahoo! Sports (via the Minneapolis Star Tribune), Childress told Frerotte that a "gut feeling" drove the decision to keep Frerotte on the sidelines after the 37-year-old signal-caller's broken back had healed.

"I just don't know what to think right now," Frerotte told Silver after Sunday's game.  "It was a very frustrating experience, because I felt like I should've been the one playing.  That might sound selfish, but I think I would've given us the best chance to win.  I'm going home to St. Louis [on Monday] to be with my family and figure out where things stand, but the way things played out at the end really makes me question things."

Citing unnamed team sources, Silver reports that Jackson had a "deer-in-the-headlights" vibe all afternoon against the Eagles, and that the team's sideline was in "total disarray."

Writes Silver of the overall performance of the players in purple:  "I have a new nickname for that large block of Vikings season-ticket holders (45 percent) that elected not to purchase playoff tickets:  visionaries."

Bottom line?  While it remains unclear whether Jackson will be the starter in 2009, Frerotte's name can be scratched from the list.  There's simply no way that Childress will re-embrace Frerotte based on his decision to, you know, speak the accurate truth.
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 06, 2009, 11:50:29 AM
(http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff122/mrformaldehyde/frerotteheadbutt.gif)
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 06, 2009, 02:13:05 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 06, 2009, 11:50:29 AM
(http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff122/mrformaldehyde/frerotteheadbutt.gif)

LOL - a classic
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 09, 2009, 12:01:10 PM
http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80df9cea

Some locker room footage after the game. McNabb speech + someone yelling "we're in there like swim wear" :-D
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: phillymic2000 on January 09, 2009, 04:17:45 PM
Some shots of the tailgate and game. Great people up there!

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y42/phillymic/EaglesVikingsgame004.jpg)

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y42/phillymic/EaglesVikingsgame011.jpg)

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y42/phillymic/EaglesVikingsgame012.jpg)

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y42/phillymic/EaglesVikingsgame014.jpg)
Cold as ish, -2 degrees, -30 windchill. I've never had my beer freeze up on me before. One of the host viking tailgaters who invited us in. They fed us, let us get warm in the tent and we watched the 1st game. With two eagle fans I met up there.

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y42/phillymic/EaglesVikingsgame015.jpg)

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y42/phillymic/EaglesVikingsgame029.jpg)

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y42/phillymic/EaglesVikingsgame030.jpg)

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y42/phillymic/EaglesVikingsgame036.jpg)
Some crazy but cool Vike fans in our row.

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y42/phillymic/EaglesVikingsgame037.jpg)
There she is, the lady in the bottom left standing with the skull cap was the one complaining, and there is the vike fan she had kicked out. LOL Beeeatch

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y42/phillymic/EaglesVikingsgame042.jpg)

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y42/phillymic/EaglesVikingsgame044.jpg)

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y42/phillymic/EaglesVikingsgame057.jpg)
Bunkley responding to the chants.

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y42/phillymic/EaglesVikingsgame072.jpg)
Dawk was possesed as he left the field it was freakin awesome.

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y42/phillymic/EaglesVikingsgame075.jpg)
A ton of Giants Suck chants from the faithful

Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: phillymic2000 on January 09, 2009, 05:35:59 PM
a couple more

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y42/phillymic/EaglesVikingsgame006.jpg)

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y42/phillymic/EaglesVikingsgame008.jpg)

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y42/phillymic/EaglesVikingsgame002.jpg)

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y42/phillymic/EaglesVikingsgame001.jpg)
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on January 09, 2009, 05:50:24 PM
not for nothing bud...but that shtein looked like the worst tailgater ever
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: phillymic2000 on January 09, 2009, 06:08:24 PM
It was cold as hell, most were inside their tents until about an hour and a half before game time. They had heaters a nice size flat panel, and good food. So for a free tailgate it was aight
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: reese125 on January 09, 2009, 06:15:25 PM
no I hear ya. I know its all about the people your there with and the alcohol/grub thats presented

I guess I was just waiting for a clan of penguins or some sled dogs coming through the parking lot in one of those snapshots
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: phillymic2000 on January 09, 2009, 06:24:30 PM
Quote from: reese125 on January 09, 2009, 06:15:25 PM
no I hear ya. I know its all about the people your there with and the alcohol/grub thats presented

I guess I was just waiting for a clan of penguins or some sled dogs coming through the parking lot in one of those snapshots

Now I know why Gander Mountain, and Bass Pro Shops are so popular, it looked like everyone was going ice fishing
Title: Re: Minnesota Talk
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 09, 2009, 07:43:50 PM
Bill Simmons:

QuoteTarvaris "Taint" Jackson